g eorge w ashington u niversity c enter for e quity and e xcellence in e ducation education without...

23
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009 Migrant Education Program Conference How Can We Improve the Reading Comprehension of Our Struggling Readers?

Upload: alexina-hilda-thomas

Post on 23-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy

October 19, 2009

2009 Migrant Education Program Conference

How Can We Improve the Reading Comprehension of Our Struggling

Readers?

Page 2: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Comprehension is not constantThe ability to comprehend written texts is not a

static or fixed ability, but rather one that involves a dynamic relationship between the demands of texts and the prior knowledge and goals of readers.

From Reading in the Disciplines: The Challenges of Adolescent Literacy – Final Report from Carnegie Corporation of New York’s Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy By Carol D. Lee and Anika Spratley of Northwestern Univ.

Page 3: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Comprehension must be created• Reading comprehension is an active process

that engages the reader; it is not a passive receptive process.

• Reading is intentional thinking during which meaning is constructed through interactions between text and reader.

From Guide for Discussing the Findings of the National Reading Panel Report – R3CC Draft 2001

Page 4: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Sources of Prior KnowledgeInclude:• words and word forms• sentence structure or syntax• text structures or genres• topics

Page 5: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Prior Knowledge of TopicsStudies have demonstrated thatprior knowledge of topics can influence whatwe comprehend, what we pay attention to, evenwhat perspectives we take.

From Reading in the Disciplines

Page 6: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Why teach comprehension strategies?

The idea behind explicit instruction in text comprehension is that comprehension can be improved by teaching students to use specific cognitive strategies or to reason strategically when they encounter barriers to comprehension when reading. (4-39/40)

From Guide for Discussing the Findings of the National Reading Panel Report – R3CC Draft 2001

Page 7: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Strategies used by good readersThere is a considerable body of research documenting

the strategies that good readers use. These strategies include:

1. asking questions2. making predictions3. testing hypotheses4. summarizing5. monitoring understanding and deploying fix-itstrategies as needed.From Reading in the Disciplines

Page 8: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Areas of Instruction for Expanding Readers’ Skills

• Pre-reading• Predicting• Testing hypotheses against the text• Asking questions• Summarizing

From Reading in the Disciplines

Page 9: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Generic Reading StrategiesCan be applied to texts across content areas• Monitor comprehension• Pre-read• Set goals• Think about what one already knows• Ask questions• Make predictions• Test predictions against the text• Re-read• SummarizeFrom Reading in the Disciplines

Page 10: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Thinking Tools to Support Student Use of Comprehension Strategies

Some examples include:• Double Entry Journals• KWL• Graphic Organizers• Anticipation Guides• Annotation of Texts

From Reading in the Disciplines

Page 11: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

What Does Research Say About the Characteristics

of High QualitySupplementary Reading Instruction?

Page 12: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

12

PA MEP Service Delivery Plan Objectives

SDP Objective 5A: • Increase percentage of migrant students who receive

data-informed supplementary instruction in reading (by at least 5 percentage points annually).

SDP Objective 5B:• Increase the percentage of migrant ELL students

scoring proficient or advanced on the Reading PSSA (by at least 2 percentage points annually).

Page 13: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

13

PA MEP Service Delivery Plan Objectives

SDP Objective 5B:In 2007 –20% of migrant students met the reading target.

In 2008 –17% of migrant students met the reading target.

Page 14: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

14

What Does the Research Tell Us?

• On one point scholars agree. Giving students more time will not, in and of itself, improve learning. It is all about what educators do to make the most of any extra time they get.

Education Week – 2008

Page 15: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

15

What Does the Research Tell Us?

• One-on-one tutoring produces an average growth of 2 letter grades in a class.

• Effect sizes were related to qualifications of instructors—favoring instructors who were specially trained in the targeted interventions (incl. college students, community volunteers, etc.)

Results of Multiple Reports on the Impact of Adult-Delivered Tutoring (1975 – 1998)

Page 16: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

16

What Does the Research Tell Us?

• More intensive interventions had a greater impact. Programs that were short, but intense, had greater effect than longer, less intense interventions.

• One-on-one reading tutoring, led by trained adults, can have a significant positive impact on student reading ability, particularly for younger students.

How Effective Are One-to-One Tutoring Programs in Reading for Elementary Students At-risk of Reading Failure?, Elbaum, Vaughn, Moody (2000)

Page 17: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Areas of Instruction for Expanding Readers’ Skills

• Pre-reading• Predicting• Testing hypotheses against the text• Asking questions• Summarizing

From Reading in the Disciplines

Page 18: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Before Reading StrategiesPreview

Text genre, context, text featuresPrior knowledge

PredictTopics to be coveredPoints madeQuestions raised

Page 19: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Before Reading StrategiesAnticipation Guide for “Electric Money”

Tobacco leaves used to be used as money.

T F

Bartering is a more effective economic system than using money.

T F

Paperclips could be money if we all agreed that they were.

T F

Paper money was invented by goldsmiths and not governments.

T F

US dollars wouldn’t be worth anything if enough people chose not to accept them as payment.

T F

Page 20: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

During Reading StrategiesCheck PredictionsMonitor Comprehension

Page 21: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

After Reading StrategiesPersonal ResponseSummarize

Page 22: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Skilled Reading

Page 23: G EORGE W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY C ENTER FOR E QUITY AND E XCELLENCE IN E DUCATION Education Without Borders: Bridges to Literacy October 19, 2009 2009

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION

Next Steps

Wiki Sitehttp://

migrantreadingcomprehension.wikispaces.com/