fy18 production plan status brief production plan status brief eom apr 2018 navmac production plan...

FY18 Production Plan Status BriefEOM May 2018

NAVMAC Production PlanNumber of Products/Services Produced

Mission Area Product Production Metric – Number Completed(Completed, not including Canceled) in FY

FY13 Actual

FY14 Actual

FY15 Actual

FY16Actual

FY17Actual

FY18Planned

Navy’s Occupational Classification Systems (NOCS)

P01 Number of Job Analysis Studies 25 20 23 17 23 20

P02 Number of NOCS Classification Change Requests (CCRs) 152 124 163 236 194 184

P03 Number of NOCS Tasks 23 16 18 13 18 17

Fleet Manpower Requirement Determination (FMRD) Program

P04 Number of Aviation Manpower RQMT Determination (MRD) Studies 9 13 27 20 20 32Number of Afloat / Exped MRD Studies 11 8 21 2 9 12

P05Number of Aviation Readiness Reviews (SQMDs, MRWs) 35

Number of Afloat Readiness Reviews (A-MPT, BCRs, SMDs) 747 590 601 636 616 600

P06 Number of Aviation Acquisition Documents 8 6 5 8 13 9

Number of Afloat Acquisition Documents 14 11 3 9 4 4

P07 Number of Aviation Special Tasks 2 2 1 1 1 2

Number of Afloat / Expeditionary Tasks 5 2 4 9 11 4

P08 Number of Aviation Workload Doc Reviews 50 41 35 37 40 40

Number of Afloat / Exped Workload Doc Reviews 118 113 85 72 43 50

Navy’s Manpower Management Program Administration

P09 Number of Policy Reviews 516 508 401 458 341 422P10 Number of Special Policy Tasks 11 31 28 9 14 17P11 Number of Shore Manpower Change Requests (MCRs) 4897 4972 5414 5459 6590 N/AP12 Number of Activity Manpower Document (AMD) Position Reviews 1497 18714 3644 3592 3431 3500P13 Number of MRD Tasks 14 9 15 12 14 13

Navy’s Manpower Information System (IS) Business Requirement

P14 Number of System Change Requests (SCRs) 73 65 76 67 77 75P15 Number of Request for Information Services (RISs) 0 1 1 0 1 3

P16 Number of Business Requirement (BURT) Change Requests 59 94 6 130 13 340

P17 Number of User Account Requests 256 554 634 853 1236 400

P18 Number of Manpower IS Policy / Governance Tasks 127 409 409 452 450 640

P19 Number of Data Configuration Tasks 82 138 90 212 458 950 2

M4

M3

M2

M1

3

Mission Area Functions Lead

Office Performance Standard Metric FY13Actual

FY14Actual

FY15Actual

FY16Actual

FY17Actual

FY18Planned

Effective Navy Occupational Classification

System (NOCS)

F1 Administer the Officer and Enlisted Occupational Classification Structure

Code 10

Percent of Approved NEOS Documents Meeting Performance Criteria

98% 100% 88% 87% 95% 100%

Code 10

Percent of Completed CCRs Meeting Cycle Time Standards

FYTD52% 26% 78% 63% 79% 65%

Valid Fleet Manpower

Requirements Determination

(FMRD)

F2 Develop and document manpower requirements for all fleet activities within the Navy

Code 30 Percent of Approved FMRD

Documents in Compliance with FMRD Performance Criteria

53% SQMD95% MRW

45% STSTD

51% SQMD86% MRW

65% STSTD

71% SQMD81% MRW

65% STSTD

86% SQMD91% MRW

65% STSTD

90% SQMD91% MRW

65% STSTD

90% SQMD91% MRW

78% STSTD

Code 40

75% SMD47% FMD

43% SMD54% FMD

34% SMD64% FMD

33% SMD59% FMD

48% SMD59% FMD

65% SMD66% FMD

F3 Provide manpower requirements determination support for Navy’s acquisition programs and initiatives

Code 30

Percent of Completed Manpower Workload Document Reviews

Meeting Cycle Time Standards FYTD

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Code 40 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Effective Manpower

Management Program

Administration

F4 Provide technical consulting services in all areas of manpower management to manpower managers, manpower Budget Submitting Offices (BSOs) and OPNAV sponsors

Code 20

Percent of Manpower Management Policies Meeting

Effectiveness Criteria Defined in the Manpower Management

Policy Effectiveness Matrix Guide

85% 85% 91% 91% 91% 94%

F5 Provide direct support to CNO central authority to enforce policy or additional technical guidance needed to achieve objectives of total force manpower management

Code 20

Percent of AMD Position Data Meeting Compliance Rules

Documented in the OPNAVINST 1000.16 and Activity Manpower Management Guide (AMM-G)

99.97%

99.96% Distrib

95.83%Non-Dist

99.98% Distrib

95.79%Non-Dist

99.85% Distrib

98.25%Non-Dist

99.94% Distrib

98.45%Non-Dist

99.5% Distrib

99.2%Non-Dist

F6 Provide direct support to Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) in managing the Navy Manpower Requirements Program

Code 20

Percent of MRD Policies Meeting Effectiveness Criteria Defined in

the Manpower Management Policy Effectiveness Matrix Guide

85% 85% 91% 91% 91% 94%

Effective Information System (IS) Performance of Manpower

Process

F7 Provide functional management support for assigned manpower Automated Information Systems (AIS)

FMOPercent of Manpower Business

RQMT Met by Information System (IS) (TFMMS / NMRS)

84% AMM49% FMRD

85% AMM54% FMRD

85% AMM57% FMRD

85% AMM58% FMRD

85% AMM58% FMRD

92% AMM58% FMRD

NAVMAC Production Plan Key Performance Standard Metrics

M4

M3

M2

M1

4

Navy Enlisted Occupational Standards (NEOS) P01 FY18 Document Production (as of 31 May 2018)

StatusTotal

Documents in Production (P01) (Last EOM / Current EOM)

OC

CSTD

Endorsed by RS

Implementation Phase

OC

CSTD

Published

Closed: Implemented(Published) /

Cancelled

Preliminary Phase

Data Phase

ComputationPhase

Route D

raft OC

CSTD

through NAVM

AC

Assessment Phase

Submit Final O

CC

STD D

ocument to R

S for Endorsement

Approval Phase

* 34/34 8/0 2/5 12/11 1/6 0/0 2/3 9/9

Active

BUCMEASWUT

CECTMETEOFCICISITITSOSRP

AEADAOASEMMT

CSCTNYN

PublishedCTICTTLSMNFCAMCCSSLSSYNS

Cancelled On-hold

Studies scheduled to start later in FY18: AC, AZ, SH, STG

*Column totals include Last Update / Current Update (updated weekly), with column detail changes highlighted in Blue Italic.

Status

Total


Docum

ent Approved

Complete: Approved / Cancelled(pre-Implementation

Phase)

AM

D U

pdates: Implem

entation Phase

Preliminary Phase Data Phase Computation

Phase

Draft D

ocument C

ompleted

Assessment Phase

Final Docum

ent Com

pleted

Approval Phase

*37 / 37 10 / 10 6 /4 7 /11 1 / 1 0 / 0 10 / 11

Active

1. NECFC Bahrain2. ACU 2 Sea3. ACU 2 Shore4. ACU 1 Sea5. ACU 1 Shore6. LPD 17 Class7. EODGRU 28. EODESU 29. EOD MU 1210.EOD MU 6

1. ACU 4 Sea2. ACU 4 Shore3. ACU 5 Sea4. ACU 5 Shore

1. ACB 1 Sea2. ACB 1 Shore3. ACB 2 Sea4. ACB 2 Shore5. LHA 66. USS

Constitution7. BMU 1 Sea8. BMU 2 Sea9. BMU 1 Shore10.BMU 2 Shore11.T-AH 19

Processing FRCs

Out for Fleet Review1. NBU 7

1. DDG 51 IIA52. CNBG 13. SSGN4. AEGIS ASHORE5. DDG 51 FLT I6. DDG 51 FLT II7. DDG 51 IIA 18. DDG 51 IIA 29. DDG 51 IIA 310.DDG 51 IIA 411. LCC 20

On-Hold

Studies planned to start later in FY18 (6): NPASE, DESRON 15, LCC 19, Strike Group 5, LCS 1, LCS 2 * BMU’s broken out by Sea and Shore to align with documents

*Column totals include Last EOM / Current EOM, with column detail changes highlighted in Blue Italic.

Ship/Fleet Manpower Documents (SMD/FMD) P04 FY18 Production Status (as of 31 May 2018)

5

Status

Total

Documents in Implementation (P05) (Last EOM / Current EOM)

Approved, pending implementation In Progress

AM

D updated

AMDs updatedFM

RD

fully implem

entedComplete

*144 / 145 55 /41 4 / 4 86 /100

Active

LCS 1 SUW PSMD (4 of 4)LCS 2 SUW PSMD (4 of 4)

LCS 1 ASW PSMD (4 of 4)LCS 2 ASW PSMD (4 of 4)

LCS 1 MCM PSMD (4 of 4)LCS 2 MCM PSMD (4 of 4)

DDG 51 FLT IIA3 SMD (8 of 12)DDG 51 FLT IIA4 SMD (8 of 8)

CVN 78 PSMD (1 of 1)

DDG 51 FLT IIA3 (4 of 12) DDG91, DDG 92, DDG 93, DDG 94

SSN 688 Class SMD (17 of 34)SSN 774 Class SMD (13 of 15)MDSU 1 (2 of 2)MCMRON 5 (1 of 1)DDG 51 FLT IIA5 (2 of 2)DDG FLT I DSMD (2 of 2)1

MDSU 2 (1of 1)CNBG 2 (2 of 2) CNBG 1 (2 of 2)DDG 1000 (1 of 1)SSGN 726 (8 of 8) CBMU (4 of 4) Aegis Ashore (4 of 4) DDG FLT I (21 of 21) DDG 51 FLT II SMD (7 of 7)DDG FLT IIA1 (6 of 6) DDG FLT IIA 2(6 of 6) LCC 20 SMD (1 of 1)

SSN 688 SMD (34 of 34)SSN 774 SMD (13 of 15)MDSU 1 FMD (2 of 2)MCMRON 5 FMD (1 of 1)DDG 51 FLT IIA5 SMD (2 of 2)MDSU 2 FMD (1of 1)CNBG 2 FMD (2 of 2) CNBG 1 FMD (2 of 2)DDG 1000 SMRD (1 of 1)SSGN 726 (8 of 8) CBMU (4 of 4) Aegis Ashore (4 of 4) DDG FLT I (21 of 21)DDG 51 FLT II SMD (7 of 7)DDG FLT IIA1 (6 of 6) DDG FLT IIA 2(6 of 6) LCC 20 SMD (1 of 1)

On-Hold


Ship/Fleet Activity Manpower Documents (AMD) P05 FY18 Production Status (as of 31 May 2018)

6

Notes: (1) Two DDG FLT I AMDs were updated to reflect DSMD requirements to support COMNAVSURFOR special projects resulting from Comprehensive Review.

Status

Total


Docum

ent Approved

Complete: Approved / Cancelled(pre-Implementation

Phase)

AM

D U

pdates: Implem

entation Phase

Preliminary Phase Data Phase Computation

Phase

Draft D

ocument C

ompleted

Assessment Phase

Final Docum

ent Com

pleted

Approval Phase

46 / 50 9 / 10 14 / 14 7 / 10 2 / 2 2 / 0 11 / 14

Active(14)

HSC-2 ~HSC-3 VX-9 TOC MTOC

Staffing Std• MNT-012

Staffing Std

VX-1 ~HSC-85 CVN 71 MRW

Staffing Std ACM W/C 670 ACM W/C 67A ACM02.000 (w/c 030)

Processing Reclama

Out for Fleet Review CVN 69 MRW~ L Class

Staffing Std

Approved FY18 ~VQ-4 & Det ~VQ-3 & Dets CVN 74 MRW ~VX-9 VFC-111 HM-15~VAQ-209 HM-14 HSC-CVW HSC CVW FDNF

Staffing Std MNT-003 SF-001 MNT-021

Staffing Std Rescinded MNT-028

On-Hold

(22)

~VOD MRW

Staffing Std CVW-002 MNT-011 ~MNT-029

VFA-122 Strike Fighter Wing Det El Centro VFA-204 ~VFC-12 VP-30~HSM CVW~HSM CVW (FDNF)~VAQ-129 F/A-18E 10PAA CVW F/A-18E 12PAA CVW F/A-18F 10PAA CVW F/A-18F 12PAA CVW~HSM-40~HSM-41

VAQ CVW VAQ EXP

Staffing Std• ADM-001• ADM-002

*Column totals include Last EOM / Current EOM, with column detail changes highlighted in Blue Italic. 7

Aviation Manpower Documents (SQMD/MRW) P04 FY18 Production Status (as of 31 May)

Studies planned to start later in FY18: C-40A; VQ-7; XXO; ~ACM W/C 51F; ~VR C130T 4 PAA; ~VR C130T 5 PAA; ~VAW E-2C Class;

Status

Total

Documents in Implementation (P05) (Last EOM / Current EOM)

Approved, pending implementation In Progress

AM

D updated

AMDs updated / Cancelled

FMR

D fully im

plemented

Complete / Cancelled

41 / 50 9 / 17 1 / 0 31 / 33

Active

Approved FY17 VRC-30 Shore VRC-30 Sea VRC-40 Sea VRC-40 Shore

Approved FY18 HM-15 VFC-111 HM-14 HSC-CVW (0 of 9) HSC CVW FDNF

PSQMD

OTHER

OTHER VFA-83 CVN 74 MRW PSMD LHA 7 MRW PSQMD VAQ-141 PSQMD VFA-101 VFA-211 VR-51 HSM-35 HSM-37 HSM-48 VFA-37 VX-9 Det Edwards VP-1 VX-9 Det Nellis VRC-30 Det 5 VQ-4 Det PAX VQ-3 Det Offutt VQ-3 Det Travis VQ-4 VAW-115 VAW-123 VQ-3 VAQ-209 ~VX-9

Cancelled• CVW Staff (9 of 9)

VFA-37 VFA-83 VP-1 VR-51Approved FY16 VAW E-2C Class (6 of 6) VAW-113; VAW-115; VAW-116; VAW-117; VAW-123; VAW-124

F/A-18F 12 PAA (9 of 9) VFA-2; VFA-11; VFA-22; VFA-32; VFA-41; VFA-103; VFA-154; VFA-211; VFA-213 HSM EXP Class (6 of 6) HSM-35, HSM-37, HSM-48, HSM-49, HSM-51, HSM-60

Approved FY17 VRC-30 Det 5

Approved FY18 CVN 74 MRW VQ-4 VQ-4 det PAX VQ-3 det Offutt VQ-3 det Travis VX-9 Dets Nellis & Edwards VQ-3 VAQ-209 ~VX-9

OTHER PSMD LHA-7 PSQMD VAQ-141 PSQMD VFA-101

Cancelled• CVW Staff (9 of 9)

On-Hold

PSQMD

Activity Manpower Documents (AMD) P05 FY18 Production Status (as of 31 May)

8*Column totals include Last EOM / Current EOM, with column detail changes highlighted in Blue Italic.

Manpower Management Special TaskingP10 FY18 Production Status (31 May 2018)

9

Status Manpower Management Administration Special Tasking (P10)18 / 19 Total Active On-Hold

Open(11 / 5)

1. 2018: AMM-G Update for 20182. 2017: 1000.16 Working Group3. 2017: Policy/procedure to track intermittent positions4. 2017: Other Service Manpower – Phase 2 – With TD5. 2017: IGCAI Reason Code review and update

1. 2018: PERS-4 proposal to redefine FAC “G” definitionReceived no additional Feedback

Closed: Completed Closed: Cancelled

Completed(6 / 13)

Cancelled(0/0)

1. 2018: Creation of RI Code value of “T” for inport-centric manpower requirements2. 2018: Workforce Classification Codes (Reduction in number/values per code)3. 2018: New Acquisition Professional coding convention4. 2018: Contingency Structure Code – CSS5. 2018: S-AMD Revision to support TFMMS 2.0 users6. 2018: Redefining ORG Hierarchy definitions7. 2018: Review of outstanding SCRs8. 2018: Nuclear Deterrent Enterprise consulting to SPAWAR – Received in Jan 20189. 2018: NAVMAC OPNAVINST 1000.16 Change Recommendations10. 2018: Removed Primary and Secondary from the NEC description and updating policy

to reflect "sequence dictates priority“11. 2018: FAC Z definition update to support BBD /SUBFOR Requirements12. 2018: Revised and redefined SSQ from one field to two – corrected TFMMS 2.0

deficiency.13. 2018 AMM G – Oct 2017

Manpower CCB AdministrationP14 FY18 Production Status (as of 31 May 2018)


Status

Total

System Change Request Production (P14) (Last EOM/Current EOM)

IT Provider Com

plete Final Developm

ent

Implementation Phase

IT Provider Release D

evelopment into Production

Closed: Implemented /

CancelledReview Phase

Approval Phase

Planning Phase

IT Provider Receive Functional Plan

Assessment Phase

IT Provider Com

plete Draft D

evelopment

Acceptance Phase

*370/383 1 / 0 44 / 44 155 / 151 1 / 3 0 / 0 158 / 17211 / 13

TFMMS

SQDN MU12 Release

(8869, 8817)SQDN MU13

Release (8822, 8815)SQDN MU14

Release (254, 6846)

GEN MU12 Release

(7027,6075)

SHIP MU21 Release

(7218,6140)

TFMMS Release(8472,8488,8494, 8495,8718,8724, 8776,8816,8937)

GEN MU11 Release

(6449,7024)

SPMIS MU03 Release

(8643,6597)

TFMMS

GEN MU10 Release

(8542,7838)

SCR 9049 “Fields in PMCM

DBT2110 Database not

Updating”

TFMMS (146)Activity/Billet (22)End Strength (8)Interfaces (15)Reports/Query (44)Bus Rules (3)EMC Logic (3)Table Maint/Other (51)

NMRS/ACM (15)Bus Rules/Table Maint (2) Other (2)

NMRS SHIP (4)Workload/Opt (0)Classification (0) Maint Data (0) Report/History (0) Org Mgmt (2)Interface (2)

NMRS SQD (7)Workload/Opt (4)Classification (1) Maint Data (0)Report/History (1)Org Mgmt (1)Interface (0)ACM( 0)

SCRs Cancelled (11)TFMMS (9) NMRS (2)

On-hold

TFMMS0 Awaiting Info

NMRS0 Awaiting Info

TFMMS2 On-Hold (7626,

8341)

NMRS42 On-Hold

134 TFMMS 34 Activity/Billet7 End Strength23 Interface36 RPT’s/Query10 Business Rule24 Table/EMC Logic

7 NMRS(0 Activity Mgmt, 5Reports, 0 Classify, 0Interfaces/Import, 1Table/BR Maint, 1Workload/Opt

Afloat/Expeditionary MRD SupportP06/P07 FY18 Production Status (as of 31 May 2018)


Status(P06)Total

Acquisition Tasking (P06) (Last EOM / Current EOM) Navy Initiative Special

Tasking (P07)Major Acquisition Programs

Supported by NAVMACAcquisition Program Documents and

Activities Supported by NAVMAC

*31 / 31 9 / 9 18/18 5/5

Active

1. CVN 782. LCS3. LHA 84. LPD 275. SSBN 8266. SSC7. T-ESB 3 8. DDG 10009. DDG 51 FLT III

1. LHA 8 PSMD2. LPD 27 PSMD3. SSBN 826 PSMD4. SSC ACU 4 PSMD5. SSC ACU 5 PSMD6. SSC NBU 7 PSMD7. T-ESB 3 PSMD8. DDG 51 FLT III PSMD

9. DDG 51 FLT IIA Pt 6 PSMD10. DDG 1000 PSMD

1. OM Reversal (Only DDGs Remain)1

2. Inport Work Study (FDNF-J)3. Inport Work Study (LPD-17)

Hold/Inactive

Hold Inactive

Closed

Completed

1. DDG 1000 SMRD2. LCS 1 SUW PSMD3. LCS 2 SUW PSMD4. LCS 1 ASW PSMD5. LCS 2 ASW PSMD6. LCS 1 MCM PSMD7. LCS 2 MCM PSMD8. CVN 78 Ch-1 PSMD

Cancelled1. MK-38 MOD 2/3 (CVN 68/78)2. SMD History for CPF (N1)

Notes: (1) DDG 51 Class OM Reversal will be considered complete when all AMDs are implemented in TFMMS.

Aviation MRD SupportP06/P07 FY18 Production Status (as of 31 May)


Acquisition Studies to start in FY18: E2D AR; MQ-8; P-8A; NGJ Inc 2; MQ-4 VUP; MQ-25A; MH-60S (AOEW); VXX;

12

Status(P06)Total

Acquisition Tasking (P06) (Last EOM / Current EOM)Navy

Initiative Special Tasking (P07)

Acquisition Program Documents Supported by NAVMAC

Acquisition Program Documents Produced by NAVMAC

* 8 / 8 8 / 8 0 / 0 5 / 5

Open

E2D (FRS) ROC/POE (MIS) E2D (fleet) PSQMD update + Aerial refueling + ECP (hold for data)

PSQMDsMERs

MALS Troop to Task (5 separate documents) VFA-106 40% VFA-106 50% VFA-122 50% VFA-122 60%

Closed

CMV-22B (VRM 30 & FDNF) PSQMDs delivered to N98 for N12 CMV22B FRS (VRM 50) MIS Completed MQ25C Tanker CVW Detachment MIS E2D/MQ25C Tanker Composite CVW Squadron MIS F/A-18F/MQ25C Tanker Composite CVW Squadron MIS MQ-8C SOF detachment MIS for N98 RES

MRD Program AdministrationP13 FY18 Production Status (31May 2018)

13

Status

Total

MRD Tasks in Production (P13) (Last EOM /Current EOM)

Product Approved

ImplementPhase

Product Delivered

Closed:Completed / Cancelled

Receive Phase

Research Phase

Product Data C

ollection

Analyze Phase

Product Analysis

Report Phase

13 / 17 0 / 0 3 / 0 5 / 6 2 / 1 0 / 2 6 / 8

Active

2018 2018 2018

1. FDNF Inport Study2. Operational Workweek

NAF Study3. 2019 Analytics Agenda:

Ship maintenance data analysis for future Ship Age standard work

4. 2019 Analytics Agenda: CM Manpower Standard study COAs development

2017

1. Fatigue Study CVN

Perpetual

2018

20171. Personal Time

& Delay

2018

1. Inport critical rating selection criteria

2. GAO Policy MGM Inport

2017

2018

1. GAO Policy MGM AFS&M

2. MGM to establish AFS&Ms for ship SMDs

3. USFF VSMR Model consulting and Kink-off meeting

Cancelled1. SMRD Library2. Work Classification

for MRD3. SMRDP IPT4. CM Manpower

Standard5. Ship Aging Modifier

On-hold

1. MRD Handbook Redesign

NEOCS Classification Change Requests P02 FY18 Production Status (as of 31 May 2018)

*Column totals include Last Update / Current Update, with column detail changes highlighted in Blue Italic. 14

Status

Total

CCR Production (P02) (Last Update /Current Update)

Board Voting C

ompleted

Approval Phase

CC

R A

pproved

Closed:Completed / CancelledReceive

PhaseReview Phase

(Internal)

CC

R Internal R

eview C

ompleted

Document Phase (Action

Memo)

CC

R Subm

itted for Board Voting via Tracker

Assessment Phase

(Voting)97 / 104 6 / 0 0 / 0 1 / 5 10 / 9 3 / 6 77 / 84

Active

TRR (0)

NEOCS (0)

Periodicity (0)

TRR(0)

NEOCS (0)

Periodicity (0)

TRR (0)

NEOCS (5)G20A, CADX SeriesW16A, W17A, W18A

Periodicity (0)

TRR (0)

NEOCS (9)UXXX, UXXX, U18A Series, UXXX, V08B Series, 0004/(8XXX), 8XXX

Periodicity (0)

TRR (3)T41A, I36A,V83B

NEOCS (2)0121 (797A), T51A

Periodicity (1)8278

Approved TRR (22)V02B, V32A, V19A, B000 Series, 805R Series, 4141 Series, V33B, 851A Series, 8409, 8210, 4208, 4708,0509, 1317, 1319, 5350 Series, 4784,U03A, 4227, W15A, 1194 (T00A),9612 (V87B)

Approved NEOCS (47)U55A, P11A, 9138, 9147, 9169, 8330,726B, 9QVA, 848A Series, 9618,V83B, N30Z, 804R, T49A,U56A, D09A, 4942, 4955, 809A Series, G29A, 0527, 800R,7846, 8467, 4789, 0160, 727B, 9901,3350, 9113, 2819, G35A, E00A, F00A,3100/S010, 725B, AEX0 Series, 3122, 4741 (V75B), 8250, 8SEA, V92B, 781B, A00A, 4314, 7008(D15A), 803R

Approved Periodicity (8)0091 Series, 90CA, 0345 Series,778A Series, 6423 Series, 7227, U21A,V09B

Cancelled (7)0318 Series (TRR), 3381/TXXX,V31A(TRR), 20XX/PXXX, 4911 (U47A) Series4952(U52A), U54A

On-hold

WXXX, 20XX (PXXX)

NOOCS Classification Change Requests P02 FY18 Production Status (as of 31 May 2018)

* *Column totals include Last Update / Current Update with column detail changes highlighted in Blue Italic.

Status

Total

CCR Production (P02) (Last Update /Current Update)

Board Voting C

ompleted

Approval Phase

CC

R A

pproved

Closed:Completed / CancelledReceive

Phase

Review Phase

(Internal)

CC

R Internal R

eview C

ompleted

Document Phase (Action

Memo)

CC

R Subm

itted for Board Voting via Tracker

Assessment Phase (Voting)

14 / 15 0 / 0 1 / 0 1 / 1 6 / 3 2 / 1 4 / 10

Active

NOOCS (0)

Periodicity(0)

NOOCS (0)

Periodicity (0)

NOOCS (1) KV1 KV2

Periodicity (0)

NOOCS (3) JT1 4AS

Periodicity (0)

NOOCS (1) 69F

Periodicity (0)

Approved NOOCS (10) 728X MO1 NXX 7M1 FE1 DZS BM3 MH2 DI3 DI4 DI5 DS2 DS3 DS4 7A1, 7A2, 7C1, 7C2

Cancelled (0)

On-hold• 724X

15

Total FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY2256 / 56 14 / 14 6 / 6 11 / 11 14 / 14 11 / 11

Planned (44)

ACM XXO ACM W/C 51F

MNT-001 (W/C 020) MNT-002 (W/C 020 Clerk) ACM W/C 650/65A-F ACM SEAOPDET PS ACM W/C 950 ACM W/C 90A

ACM W/C 41A-Z MNT-011/MNT-025 (W/C 230) SF-002 (Shore) GEN-015 (Collateral) (R) ACM GEN-002 (Collateral) (R) SF-001 (CVW) (R) MNT-003 (W/C 030) (R) ACM W/C 030 (W/C 030) (R) GEN-012 (AW) (R) ACM GEN-001 (FOD) (R) OFF-001 (GOSG) (R)

OPS-001 (AZ/YN) TRA-004 (Res) ADM-005 (Res PS) AMCM-001 (W/C 02M) AMCM-002 (W/C 020) AMCM-003 (W/C 020 Clerk) AMCM-008 (W/C 020 Data) MNT-021 (W/C 13A) (R) ACM W/C 670 (R) ACM W/C 67A (R) ADM-001 (YN) (R) ADM-002 (PS) (R) ACM XXO (R) MNT-012 (W/C 310) (R)

AMCM-004 (W/C 05M) AMCM-005 (W/C 05M

IMRL) AMCM-013 (W/C 360) AMCM-006 (W/C 040) AMCM-007 (W/C 04A) MNT-028 (W/C 240) (R) ACM W/C 51F (R) ACM W/C 90A (R) MNT-001/002 (W/C 020)

(R) ACM W/C 650/650A-F (R) ACM SEAOPDET PS (R)

Active (6)

ACM W/C 670 – data being analyzed ACM W/C 67A – data being analyzed ADM-001 (YN) – data waiting to be analyzed ADM-002 (PS) – data waiting to be analyzed ACM W/C 030 – modifying draft staffing standard prior to routing for approval MNT-012/MNT-026 (W/C 310) – preliminary data analysis was conducted in advance of May on-site

On-hold (2) MNT-011 (W/C 230) – initial discussions conducted for upcoming study CVW-002 (FDNF) – awaiting further decisions between FDNF and Japan

Approved (4) MNT-003 (W/C 030) SF-001 (CVW) MNT-021 (W/C 13A) MNT-028 (W/C 240) - Rescinded

% Current at end of FY

76% (Currently 72%) 80% 81% 87% 92%

Aviation Manpower Documents Staffing Standards P04 (as of 31 May 2018)

17

Backup

18

Production Slide Framework{Provide Description of Slide Content}

StatusTotal

Documents in Production (Pxx) (Last EOM / Current EOM)

Product Docum

ent Approved

Implementation Phase Product Im

plemented / Published / C

ancelledClosed:

Completed / Cancelled

Preliminary Phase

Data Phase

Computation Phase D

istribute Draft Product to Stakeholders for R

eview

Assessment Phase

Submit Final Product D

ocument for A

pproval

Approval Phase

* 42 / 42 9 / 6 7/ 10 10 / 10 6 / 6 3 / 3 6 / 6 1 / 1

Active

{Plan and organize resources and data to execute the process to produce a product.}

{Collect the data necessary to produce an acceptable product.}

{Convert / translate / organize / model data into a product that meets established criteria. Completion of Draft product by NAVMAC ends this phase.}

{Draft product is being reviewed by stakeholders. Completion of Draft product (DSMD / DSQMD, DFMD, etc.) by NAVMAC starts this phase. Submission of Final product to approving authority ends this phase.}

{Final product is submitted to approving authority. Phase starts when NAVMAC completes final document. Approval / Disapproval of final product by approving authority ends this phase.}

{Product is being made available for Navy-wide use throughappropriate methods. Phase starts when product is approved and ends when released Navy-wide through appropriate channels.}

Completed{The number of products that finish the process and are actually delivered through appropriate channels to customers for Navy-wide use.}

Cancelled {If the product does not finish the last step in the process (implemented/published/approved) and is permanently set aside it is CANCELLED.}

On-hold

{Studies inpending status}

Studies scheduled to start later in FY15: {List of the studies scheduled to start later in the FY. May change as priorities shift.}

*Column totals include Last EOM / Current EOM, with column detail changes highlighted in Blue Italic.{To increase the utility of the information the slide includes indicators of what has changed from the previous month. The totals for each column include both last EOM number and current EOM number. So if last EOM was 5 and this EOM it is 6, then the totals row would display (5 / 6) to show an increase of 1. Next the actual item that has moved Phases/columns has its font changed to "Italic" and color from "Black" to "Blue' to highlight what is changing.}

NAVMACCUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY

Fiscal Year 20181st Quarter

Customer Survey Metrics

20

Fiscal Year 2018Date of Survey (Q1): 29 Nov-13 Dec (reminder sent on 6 Dec)Date of Survey (Q2): 7 Mar-21 Mar (reminder send on 14 Mar)Date of Survey (Q3): N/ADate of Survey (Q4): N/A

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Responded/contacted: 2/9 (22%) 6/9 (67%) 0/0(-%) 0/0(-%)Responded/contacted (running totals): 2/9 (22%) 8/18 (44%) 0/0(-%) 0/0(-%)

Q11 Q21 Q31 Q4Satisfaction percent (quarterly): 100% 88% -% -%Satisfaction percent (running FY): 100% 94% -% -%Annual satisfaction goal: 90% 90% -% -%Annual satisfaction goal achieved: 111% 104% -% -%

Survey focus:1. Do customers know about our processes?2. Do customers participate in our processes?3. Do customers have visibility and ready access to our products?

Customer Survey Metrics

21

Survey is focused on:1. Do stakeholders know about our processes2. Do stakeholders participate in our processes3. Do stakeholders have adequate access to our products

Annual TrackerPerformance

CriteriaVisibility of the Process Satifaction %: 84% 84%Involvment in the Process Target: 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%Access to Products % of Target: 93% 93%Visibility of the Process Satifaction %: 0% 0%Involvment in the Process Target: 90% 0% 90% 90% 90% 90%

Access to Products % of Target: 0% 0%

Visibility of the Process Satifaction %: 100% 100%Involvment in the Process Target: 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%


Visibility of the Process Satifaction %: 0% 0%

Involvment in the Process Target: 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%


Visibility of the Process Satifaction %: 96% 96%

Involvment in the Process Target: 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%


FY21Planned

FY22Planned

M1

Navy’s Occupational Classification Systems (NOCS)

Mission Area Production Metric – Customer Satisfaction(Percentage of Goal Values)

FY17 Actual

FY18Actual

FY19Planned

FY20Planned

M2

Fleet Mapower Requirement Determination (FMRD Program - (Afloat)

M4

Navy’s Manpower Information System (IS) Business Requirement

M3

Navy’s Manpower Management Program Administration

Fleet Mapower Requirement Determination (FMRD Program - (Aviation)

Command Survey Quarterly Metrics

22

MissionArea Functions

LeadOffice

PerformanceStandard Metric

%

1stQTR

%

2ndQTR

%

3rd QTR

%

4th QTR

FY18 %AVG

FY18 Detail InformationPlanned

Customers satisfied with visibility of the NEOCS/NOOC processes 100% 67% 84%

Overall Customer Satisfaction 84%

Customers satisfied with involvement with the NEOCS/NOOC processes 100% 67% 84% Target 90%

Customers Satisfied with access to NEOCS/NOOC products

100% 67% 84% % of Target Obtained 93%

Customers Satisfiied with visibility of the SQMD/MRW/SEA OPDET development processes

0% 0% 0% Overall Customer Satisfaction

Customers satisfiied with involvement with the SQMD/MRW/SEA OPDET development processes

0% 0% 0% Target 90%

Customers satisfiied with the access to SQMD/MRW/SEA OPDET products

0% 0% 0% % of Target Obtained

Customers satisfiied with visibility of the SMD/FMD processes 0% 100% 100%


Customers satisfiied with Involvement with the SMD/FMD processes 0% 100% 100% Target 90%

Customers Satisfiied with accesst to NEOCS/NOOC Products 0% 100% 100% % of Target Obtained 111%

Customers satisfiied with visibility of the acquistion SQMD development process N/A N/A N/A Overall Customer

Satisfaction N/A

Customers atisfiied with involvement with the acquisition SQMD development process N/A N/A N/A Target N/A

Customers satisfiied with the access to acquisition SQMD products N/A N/A N/A % of Target Obtained N/A

Customers satisfiied with visibility of the acquisition SMD/FMD process 0% 100% 100%


Customers satisfiied with involvement with the acquistion SMD/FMD process 0% 100% 100% Target 90%

Customers satisfiied with access to acquistion SMD/FMD products 0% 100% 100% % of Target Obtained 111%

F4 Provide technical consulting services in all areas of manpower management to manpower managers, manpower Budget Submitting Offices (BSOs) and OPNAV sponsors

Customers satisfiied with visibility of the available customer services 0% 0% 0%

Overall Customer Satisfaction

F5 Provide direct support to CNO central authority to enforce policy or additional technical guidance needed to achieve objectives of total force manpower management

Customers satisfiied with involvement with the policy development process 0% 0% 0% Target 90%

F6 Provide direct support to Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) in managing the Navy Manpower Requirements Program

Customers satisfiied with access to Navy Manpower Requirement Program policy documents

0% 0 0% % of Target Obtained

Customers satisfiied with visibility of the TFMMS Business Management processes 0% 97% 97% Overall Customer

Satisfaction 96%

Customers satisfiied with involvement with the TFMMS Business Management processes 0% 94% 94% Target 90%

Customers satisfiied with access to TFMMS Business Management products

0% 97% 97% % of Target Obtained 107%

1. Number of Individuals contacted: 32. Number of individuals responding: 13. Response Rate: 33%

Comments: One person responded to all 3 Divisions survey questions from OPNAV UIC 45997. Participant was not contacted specifically for Code 10, but survey link may have been passed to participant from an OPNAV contact from Code 20/30.

Perfomance Metric Status

M1

Effective Navy Occupational Classification System (NOCS)

F1 Administer the Officer and Enlisted Occupational Classification Structure

Code 10

M4

Effective Information System (IS) Performance of Manpower Process

F7 Provide functional management support for assigned manpower Automated Information Systems (AIS)

FMO


Comments:.One person contacted for FMO responded to FMO. Another person who was contacted for Code 30 responded to FMO not 30. A 3rd person responded to FMO, but did not provide command/UIC.

Code 40

1. Number of Individuals contacted: 22. Number of individuals responding:13. Response Rate: 50 %

Comments: One person responded to Code 40, but did not provide command/UIC.

M3

Effective Manpower

Management Program

Administration

Code 20

M2

Valid Fleet Manpower Requirements Determination (FMRD)

F2 Develop and document manpower requirements for all fleet activities within the Navy

Code 30


Comments:A participant contacted for Code 30 responded to FMO and not Code 30. Another participant contacted for Code 10, did not respond to Code 10, but seleted they work with Code 30, but then didn't answer follow up questions.

Code 40

1. Number of Individuals contacted: 22. Number of individuals responding:13. Response Rate: 50 %

Comments:.One person responded to Code 40, but did not provide

F3 Provide manpower requirements determination support for Navy’s acquisition programs and initiatives

Code 30

(N/A)Code 30 Does not have acquisition

customers


Comments:

23

Comments: One participant selected the link for the survey but did not complete it, so 5 actually completed it.

Comments: One participant selected the link for the survey but did not complete it, so 5 actually completed it. FMO had a 300% response rate due to two participants were contacted for other Codes completed FMO as well. See monthly metrics slide (COL O) for additional participant/response rate details.

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

FMO Code 10 Code 20 Code 30 Code 40

# of

Per

sonn

el

Percent of Survey Respondents by Department Q2 FY18# Contacted=9

# Respondents=6

# contacted# responded

300%

0%

50% 50%

Overall Response Rate: 67%

33%

86%87%87%87%87%87%88%88%88%88%

Visiblity Involvement Access

% S

atis

fied

Command's Overall Customer Satisfaction Q2 FY18 # Contacted=9

# Resondents=6

Customer Comments

24

Comments received: 2Comment 1: FMO: "There is a general frustration that when a majority of stakeholders (customers) report there is a change required to a system (i.e. TFMMS) it seems the process to effect the change is slow. From a customer perspective it seems like NAVMAC doesn't understand the urgency and the cost involved from the customer level when items are wrong or the process is broke. ...again - customer perspective.“

Response from FMO:Governance Process for System Change Request (SCRs)

1) Customer submits a System Change Request (SCR) via RCMS Tool2) NAVMAC FMO reviews SCR to verify its accuracy; then, places SCR and an initial priority within the SCR Governance Listing 3) Quarterly TFMMS Configuration Control Board (CCB) meeting is held with all the stakeholders toapprove all SCR prioritization where it competes with other changes that may be of a higher priority (OPNAV staff priority) , security issues, or breaks that have no work-around, etc.4) SPAWAR performs Level of Efforts (LOE(s)) on SCRs prioritized to determine how long, how many SCRs can get done with current resources or higher priority issues listed above.

Customer Comments

25

Comment 2: Code 10: “The focus is on moving the paperwork to approval - not on doing the right thing for Navy”

Response from Code 10: This comment is not explanatory enough to understand the specific issue. We don't know which division this comment is referring too, OCCSTDs, NECs, NOOCs."

For NEOCS requests:Members are given 20 days to vote on revisions and disestablishments.Members are given 30 days to vote for establishments.

For NOOCS requests:Member are given 30 days for all NOOCS requests.

For OCCSTDs reviews:Members are given 30 days for all OCCSTDs reviews.

For all Code 10 DON Tracker votes:Extensions are granted when voters request them.Voting reminder emails are sent 5-7 days out from due date.Many voting members don't vote by the assigned due date and have to be reminded multiple times.

Customer Survey Process Duties/Responsibilities. The CSC will develop preformatted templates and develop the

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) to be signed by the Commanding Officer. Coordinate with each department to maintain points of contact for the Question Mark Perception (QMP) survey. The QMP platform is hosted and managed by the Navy Education and Training Command (NETC).

Assignment. Establish a CSC position offered to all NAVMAC personnel (Military and Civilian). Assignment will rotate every two years unless the individual wishes to retain the duties for a longer period of time.

Quarterly Respondent Selections (Total of only 9 contacted per quarter).• Code 10: 3 Code 20: 1 Code 30: 2 Code 40: 2 Code FMO: 1Note: Three participants for Code 10 due to three divisions NEOC, NOOC and OCCSTDs. One participant for Code 20 and FMO due to smaller size of their customer base and two for Code 30 and 40.

Metrics- Each quarter, the Survey Coordinator will provide input to the NAVMAC Technical Director listing the following:

Date the Questionnaire was administered Quantity of respondents Survey results with any special items of interest Updated command level metrics Respondent comments

26