future_of_media_measurement forr 110
TRANSCRIPT
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 1/16
Making Leaders Successul Every Day
J 15, 2010
The Fte O MedMesemet Dd M. Coopeste
o Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 2/16
© 2010, Forrester Research, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is strictly prohibited. Inormation is based on best availableresources. Opinions refect judgment at the time and are subject to change. Forrester®, Technographics®, Forrester Wave, RoleView, TechRadar,and Total Economic Impact are trademarks o Forrester Research, Inc. All other trademarks are the property o their respective companies. To purchase reprints o this document, please email [email protected]. For additional inormation, go to www.orrester.com.
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
Includes Forrester research panel data
ExECuTivE SuMMary
Marketers can’t see value in multichannel marketing until they can measure it. V spending is still the
biggest above-the-line expense, even as Internet usage increases and mass media audiences ragment.
Yet 65% o marketing leaders think Internet measurement is more useul than V measurement.
Te ecosystem in measured media — media planning and buying agencies, media companies, and
measurement vendors — as well as marketers themselves, has entrenched practices that don’t deliver
eective accountability. But change is in the air, as online video sparks the need or interactivemeasurement practices to cross over into television and vice versa. In time, the measurement o V
advertising will become more like that o interactive marketing, and branding will be held to the stricter
accountability o direct marketing.
TabLE OF COnT EnTSMdia Masrmt Is Mird I Cal Sils
both itel ad Etel Foces Ctlze Med
Mesemet Chge
CrssMdia Masrmt Cvrc Is
CmiPrpari Fr Mdia Masrmt
Cvrc
Tv ad iteet Wll be Mesed as Oe b
2015
Med Mesemet Coegece Wll Eole
Thogh Thee Phses
WHaT iT MEanS
Rivti TV Advrtisi Al Itrt
Lis
Spplmtal Matrial
nOTES & rESOurCES
Foeste codcted two qttte ses
wth mketg ledes. We lso teewed 25
mketes, geces, d os memes o
the med mesemet sppl ch.
Rlatd Rsarc Dcmts
“ The itecte attto Ldscpe”
Octoe 20, 2009
“ The Med Meltdow Mkes itecte
Mketg a impete”
agst 24, 2009
“uS itecte Mketg Foecst, 2009 To 2014”
Jl 6, 2009
J 15, 2010
The Fte O Med MesemetPepg Fo a Coegece O Mesemet acoss Chels
by David M. Cprstiwth Km Le Qoc ad Je-yes Lgo
2
6
7
11
12
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 3/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto PohtedJ 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
2
MeDIA MeASuReMenT IS MIReD In ChAnneL SILoS
When asked what was their top media planning challenge, CMOs and other marketing leaders
Forrester surveyed point to measuring their overall media eectiveness. Measurement issues —
including justiying budgets to the executive team — outpace concerns like agency management
and selection or the cost, clutter, or commercial-skipping o television advertising (see Figure 1). As
mass media ragments and online media increase in importance, media measurement remains stuck
in channel-based silos that leave marketers with:
· Historical behaviors. Nearly all companies budget advertising spending by media channel,
rather than by marketing objective or ad ormat. Tat leads to calcied behaviors and minimal
cross-channel learnings. Few are willing to und cross-channel experimentation out o the $70
billion that they spend on television or the $25 billion or interactive in the US.1 While Forrester
sees cross-media campaigns as an increasingly important way to harness consumer media
behavior, integrated marketing will demand more comparisons o marketing eectivenessacross media.2 Tat’s something 59% o marketing leaders say is a challenge or their
organizations right now (see Figure 2).
· Dierent objectives based on available measures. While 70% o marketing leaders wish it
were easier to compare V ratings with online data, diering objectives or the channels mute
the demand or the comparison today. Fiy-two percent o online advertising spend goes
to paid search, and nearly 40% o the rest is bought on a perormance basis.3 Tus most o
online advertising is or direct marketing purposes rather than raising awareness, increasing
consideration, or other goals associated with brand campaigns.
· Incompatible metrics across channels. Most marketing leaders agree that Internetmeasurement is more useul than V viewing measurement, heightened by online’s precision
and ocus on cost per action rather than the cost per impression o television. Estimating
consumer behavior in either medium is dependent on modeling the total audience based on
tracking panels o users. Primarily due to the measurement technology available at the time, V
tracking ocused on gross rating points (GRPs) as a single metric or reach and timing, although
it allows viewer duplication. In contrast, digital measurement zeroed in on unique visitors and
page views that URL- and cookie-spotting PC- or server-based soware meters could handle.
Unortunately or cross-media accountability, this makes or apples to oranges comparisons (see
Figure 3).
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 4/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto Pohted J 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
3
Fir 1 Mketg Ledes rte Med Mesemet ad accotlt as Top Chlleges
Source: Forrester Research, Inc.
86%
53%
46%
37%
24%
19%
17%
9%
Measuring the effectiveness of my media strategyand its efficiency
Coordinating the traditional and the new mediaagencies I work with
Justifying my media budget decisionsto management
Choosing the right media agency
Television commercial clutter
The increasing cost of television
Television commercial skipping
I’m satisfied with my media strategy
Base: 79 marketing leaders(multiple responses accepted)
Source: September 2009 Global Marketing Leadership Online Survey
“Please select the five main media planning challenges
you’ve faced in 2009 among the categories below?”
Measurement issues
54091
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 5/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto PohtedJ 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
4
Fir 2 Wsh Lst icldes Coss-Med Compsos
Source: Forrester Research, Inc.54091
“Thinking of the systems and metrics used to measure marketing effectiveness and ROI,
how much do you agree with the following?”
Source: July 2009 Global Marketing Leadership Online Survey
Completelydisagree
Somewhatdisagree
Neutral Somewhatagree
Completely agree
Base: 57 marketing leaders who spend on TV
Comparing marketing effectivenessacross media (TV, Internet, print, etc.)
is a challenge for my company
I wish it were easier to compare TV ratings with online data
Internet usage measurementis more useful
than television viewing measurement
20% 40%0% 80%60% 100%
59% agree
70% agree
65% agree
Fir 3 Chel-bsed Slos iht Med Mesemet ioto
Source: Forrester Research, Inc.54091
Spending
Objectives
Metrics
$70 billion
• Mass reach
• Awareness
• Consideration
• Other branding goals
$25 billion
• Unique visitors
• Total universe reach
• Time spent
• Source/loss
Television Interactive
• Targeted audiences
• 60% to 70% directmarketing objectives
• Daypart reach
• Delayed viewing
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 6/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto Pohted J 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
5
Bt Itral Ad extral Frcs Catalyz Mdia Masrmt Ca
Media measurement will ultimately undergo radical change, driven by demand, new technologies,
and both existing and new players in the measurement supply chain. Entrenched behaviors on the
part o marketers and the measurement supply chain will drag out the evolution, but early indicators
are positive:
· Video ads show the need or a Rosetta Stone. Te small but ast-growing market or
online video ads ($870 million in 2009 growing to $3 billion in 2014) has galvanized media
measurement creativity.4 Marketing leaders surveyed rated V ads running online as their
avorite alternative to the 30-second spot.5
· Media buyers are getting cross-media religion. Media buying agencies like OMD now have
specialists that sit between digital and V, concentrating on video regardless o channel. OMD
is also working with CBS’s elevision City research acility to monitor multichannel campaigneectiveness.
· Te industry is asking or a cross-media measurement solution. Tis all, a gang o 14 media
companies, agencies, and advertisers unded the Coalition or Innovative Media Measurement
(CIMM) to issue RFPs or measurement techniques addressing cross-media video viewing and
how to best use advanced V set-top boxes (SBs).6
Te measurement industry is not ignoring these demand-side changes. New and existing players are
introducing change, such as:
·New measurement technologies that add accuracy and cross channels.
In addition toonline video, two other technology-driven trends are spurring media accountability. Te latest
generation o V set-top boxes enables advertising addressability and interactivity and can be
used to track viewing behavior. raditional, panel-based measurement companies are rolling
out new technologies too. Radio measurement stalwart Arbitron is beginning to deploy its
Portable People Meters that track individuals, not just households, and out-o-home viewing
and listening and observe multimedia behavior. Nielsen is running online video monitoring in
375 o its 7,500 people meter households with a promise to hit them all in summer 2010, as well
as statistically comparing its dierent online and V panels and oering post-campaign brand
tracking surveys through its IAG acquisition.7
· New measurement players who come rom outside V. Besides existing measurement vendorstrying to break out across silos, a handul o new suppliers oer analysis, ad targeting platorms,
and/or ad placement o o SB data licensed rom cable and satellite operators or rom iVo.
Te group includes Simulmedia, RA, Quantcast, and Rentrak, as well as Internet giants Google
and Microso/Navic. SB data will deliver millions o households’ worth o data, approaching
the level o census status.
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 7/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto PohtedJ 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
6
· New measurement techniques that promise efciency and proper attribution. Direct
marketing data and services companies including Acxiom, Experian, Merkle, and Te
Allant Group are helping marketers create target audience groups that, when combined with
addressable SBs, lead to ar more ecient V buys than those based on simple demographics.
Vendors, digital agencies, and media companies have made “attribution” one o the hot trends
in interactive marketing, rather than depending on “last click” rom a search engine or call-to-
action banner to determine ad impact.8 Tose eorts potentially provide more cost-eective and
real-time attribution than traditional pre- and post-campaign testing and expensive media-mix
modeling. Tey will serve as models or television as it digitizes.
CRoSS-MeDIA MeASuReMenT ConVeRgenCe IS CoMIng
Marketing leadership’s need or eective measurement across all media channels will drive adoption
o these new measurement technologies and techniques. But Forrester believes it will take years orestablished behaviors and systems to evolve. Evolve they will, and over the next three to ve years
we’ll see true media measurement convergence and marketing practices that evolve in lock step as
V advertising gets treated more like interactive marketing and branding gets measured more like
direct marketing (see Figure 4):
· V measurement will move rom efciency to eectiveness. oday, most V media
accountability is based on the eciency o the media buy: Agencies aim or the best deal on
lightly targeted GRPs. Tat eciency is applied to time-tested assumptions about the eects
o impressions over time on behavior such as awareness, conversion, and sales. V campaign
efectiveness today is measured only aer the act with pre- and post-campaign surveys o
exposed and unexposed groups o viewers, a slow and expensive process. Addressable SBs willimprove eciency and dramatically cut ad waste, while viewing behavior data, interactivity, and
CRM database integration will drive toward aster and more accurate eectiveness analysis.
· Marketers will monitor their audience across media. Reach and requency measures will be
trackable across all impressions, not just channel-specic impressions. Integrated meters and
SB data will use Internet-borne tracking techniques, like tagging content and ads and even
individual users. Marketers will be able to observe longer-term cross-media behavior as vendors
and agencies integrate solutions and dashboards.
· Media buys will move closer to real-time optimization. Combining advertising interactivity with addressability will enable near real-time campaign optimization in television and online.
Advertisers will be able to make creative media adjustments as they get campaign eedback that
indicates what is required to drive branding and hit actual sales objectives.
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 8/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto Pohted J 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
7
Fir 4 itecte ad Dect Mketg Wll De Mesemet Coegece
Source: Forrester Research, Inc.54091
Media measurement
convergenceTelevision
Interactive
Branding
Direct marketing
PRePARIng FoR MeDIA MeASuReMenT ConVeRgenCe
While we’re years away rom perect cross-media measurement convergence, various elements o the
concept will gain traction during the next ve years. Marketing leaders must monitor these changes
closely and be prepared with new innovations to take advantage o converged media opportunities.
TV Ad Itrt Will B Masrd As o By 2015
V-buying marketing leaders we surveyed said they wanted interactive media to adopt a V
measurement staple but were lukewarm on some advancements in V measurement. wo-thirds o marketing leaders agreed that the industry needs the equivalent o an online GRP or the Internet
(see Figure 5). But opinions were polarized on whether they’d pay or more granular V ratings, and
there were mostly neutral eelings toward new V metrics (and a lot o “don’t knows”).
Tese attitudes, plus interviews with marketers and members o the supply chain, both visionary
and conservative, lead Forrester to project a ve-plus year adoption o some o the core elements o
measurement convergence (see Figure 6). During that time, we will see:
· Common measurement currency. Marketers will go through a stage where Internet measures
are kludged into something that looks like GRPs to acilitate cross-media buying comparisons.
Later on, a measure that accounts or unique targeted reach and time spent with the messagewill emerge. A Yellow Book exec wasn’t the only one to call the GRP “an anachronism,” and
marketing leaders with direct marketing backgrounds derided its precision. Even though V
GRPs allow duplication o individuals, they elegantly account or requency and/or recency,
both o which are critical attribution elements and potentially useul or measuring the
elusive “engagement” that marketers like L’Oréal value. Companies like CNN, ESPN, and NBC,
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 9/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto PohtedJ 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
8
among others, have oered dierent models to aggregate total channel reach, but there’s no
consensus yet. Agencies like Carat that have converted online impressions to GRPs warn that it
usually adds little incremental reach and believe that proper online attribution will ultimately
point away rom a GRP-like solution. In the meantime, Nielsen is proposing a time-basedmeasurement or both interactive and V and also oers some techniques or translating more
conventional online measures.
· Granular audience segmentation. Mass reach will evolve into targeted, unique audience
segment reach measured across channels. But today there’s no standard or automated way
to compare granular audiences across V and the Internet on a national basis. Each o the
direct marketing data suppliers is involved in trials with SB data to construct narrower target
audience sets than the basic demographics that drive V ratings. And the existing measurement
company systems map their panels against richer demographic and buying pattern models
rom third parties. Most marketers and buyers use homegrown dashboards to manipulate these
targets, but the newer SB-based trials are more integrated. What about tracking individual
viewers? Te US television industry is highly concerned about government regulation, so
personally identiable inormation will remain protected via third-party mechanisms. Tat’s
one reason why panels will never be replaced entirely by SB networks — they’ll remain the way
to conrm audience modeling assumptions; assess actual purchase behavior; and, with portable
meters, track out-o-home viewing.
· Real-time V optimization. Although talk o the death o the upront season occurs every
year, pre-season V spending commitments depend more on jockeying or pricing, the overall
economy, and the steady erosion o September programming launches by the networks than on
buyer demands or exibility. SB data providers will deliver regional overnight ratings beoreNielsen will, enabling aster optimization or reach objectives, i not or CPA tuning. We heard
mixed results rom marketers who had experimented with Google’s V Ads marketplace —
some liked the data but others hated auctions or mistrusted the “black box.”
· Measurement convergence with other media. Radio has Arbitron driving Portable People
Meters and online Webcasting pushing measurement convergence. Print has neither, is a long
way rom ull digitization, and is the medium that many o the marketers we talked to were re-
evaluating — downward. Outdoor and in-store signage has spots o highly “modern” activity,
but only spots. For example, YCD Multimedia has tied in-store signage management to cash
register purchase inormation or customers like Burger King and Dunkin’ Donuts.
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 10/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto Pohted J 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
9
Fir 5 Mketes rem Cosete O new Mesemet Techologes
Source: Forrester Research, Inc.54091
“Thinking of the systems and metrics used to measure marketing effectiveness and ROI,
how much do you agree with the following?”
Source: July 2009 Global Marketing Leadership Online Survey
Completelydisagree
Somewhatdisagree
Neutral Somewhatagree
Completely agree
The industry needs the equivalentof an online GRP for the Internet
I would be willing to payfor more granular commercial
TV ratings data
I am pleased with recent developmentsin TV audience metrics(e.g., second by second, C3 ratings, etc.)
Base: 57 marketing leaders who spend on TV
20% 40%0% 80%60% 100%
67% agree
22% agree
35% agree
Fir 6 Mesemet Coegece Elemets Emege Oe Tme
Source: Forrester Research, Inc.54091
Common measurement currency
Granular audiencesegmentation
Real-time TV optimization
Measurement convergencefor other media
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Radio
Out-of-home
Converging media measurement
Radio
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 11/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto PohtedJ 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
10
Mdia Masrmt Cvrc Will evlv Tr Tr Pass
CMOs who desire better marketing ROI measure should drive media measurement convergence.
Forrester doesn’t advocate reorienting the entire marketing organization around media planning,
buying, and measurement. But aggressive marketing leaders should consider three phases o
measurement convergence that tie media measurement in closer to overall marketing and campaign
strategy (see Figure 7):
· 2010 to 2011: est and experiment with new measurement options. Te next 12 to 24 months
are about trials and experimentation. Yellow Book is testing the Google V Ads marketplace
to understand: 1) just how addressable it is; 2) its perormance versus other media; and 3)
how much money and internal resources it will need to exploit it. Create a multichannel
measurement task orce that will bridge traditional and interactive perspectives and allow both
sides to evaluate the new tools and techniques. Te task orce must decide whether marketing
is more concerned with optimizing a particular media channel, or whether testing integrationis a higher priority. One o the most aggressive advanced V agencies, Starcom advises to x
V rst. It is modeling the metrics or accuracy and assumptions or how to extrapolate to the
total addressable audience granularly on three ronts: ront-end data modeling, the SB panels
themselves, and the decision engines or optimization.
· 2011 to 2013: Re-engineer media management processes. Measurement convergence
technologies will start to scale nationally, and measurement standards will solidiy. Media buys
across V and online will become comparable, which will allow CMOs and their teams to make
media buying and planning decisions outside o the silos and measure the success o integrated
campaigns holistically. eams will use valid comparison metrics to re-evaluate marketing mix
model and campaign optimization assumptions around things like reinorcement, burnout, and
the amplication o content brand and relevance on marketing messages.
· 2014 and beyond: Reinvent television advertising. Addressable, interactive V ads will be
mainstream in ve years, likely accounting or 20% to 30% o spend. Tat means integrated
campaigns geared to move audience segments through the buying cycle will be much more
managed procedures than they are now. Creative ight sequencing will be a harder problem
than media planning. CMOs will consider moving media completely in-house, as V
increasingly accommodates sel-serve buying tools rom Google and the cable operators. Even i
most V buying and selling remains on the gol course rather than online, CMOs will institute
continuous planning to exploit the exibility and near real-time optimization o traditionalmedia channels.
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 12/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto Pohted J 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
11
Fir 7 Mge Coeget Mesemet i Thee Phses
Source: Forrester Research, Inc.54091
Testing andexperimentation,2009 to 2011
Comparison andre-engineering,2011 to 2013
Reinventing television,beginning in 2014
Multichannel task force
Media buyingby format or objectiveinstead of channel
Common strategy/media/creative team
• Agency coordination
• Prioritize channeloptimization versusmultichannelintegration
• Budget forexperimentation
• Institute flexibleplanning cycles
• Replace media mixmodeling
• Consider in-housemedia buying
Phase Organization Processes Tools
• Re-evaluate mixmodeling assumptions
• Sanity check across
tools, channels
• Establish KPIsfor engagement, etc.
• Operationalize new
measurement concepts
• Set-top box data
• Direct marketing data
• Multichannelsegmentation
• Common currencyacross Internet and TV
• Integrated measurementdashboards
• Hybrid paneland census approach
• Multichannelbehavioral tracking
• Real-time optimization
W H a T i T M E a n S
ReInVenTIng TV ADVeRTISIng ALong InTeRneT LIneS
as med mesemet coeges, so too wll some o the mketg omts d g
pocedes. Jst how mch wll Tv look lke the iteet? Foeste epects the ollowg:
· TV ad twrks will strl t t prmim ivtry. The detsg sppl ch s
moe ds-tegted ole th t s o teleso. Tod, Tv ep ms, jst lke d etwoks,
get ccess ol to emt o spot eto. Ole, sech, d cotetl dspl d
etwok mgs decled pdl: The etwok tll kept 40% o the sped t qckl
eded p wth 10% to 20%. Lkewse, el-tme, cto-sed mketplces esemlg
Google adWods wll stggle to g tcto. Stcom ss most o ts clets tht ted
Google Tv ads e’t comg ck. Mekle’s LogcL s tg to ld mketplce cossmesed d mesed med d s wsel cocettg o metcs st.
· Clicktr TV will rmai islatd.Tv’s moe psse ewg epeece o Dvr
o commecl skppg leds tsel to “clck o moe omto t lte tme” led
geeto ppoch the th dected shoppg epeece otsde o shoppg
etwoks lke QvC d HSn. Smll, clcks o podcts plced how-to shows wll
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 13/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto PohtedJ 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
12
e moe efecte th clcks to le moe ot st’s w dess. Few mketes
wll et wdgets tht eqe comple pogmmg whe the c pode psse
commecls d podct plcemets sted.
· Ttal TV spdi will rw. Foeste elees tht lthogh pope mesemet wll ct
dow o Tv spedg wste, the et eslt wll e moe the th less spedg o Tv oe
tme. Tv wll em the mss dg medm o choce t wll dele moe elece
thogh ette dece tgetg. The comto o ctcl mss ech d tgetg wll
cese CPMs, t mketes shold e comotle spedg them d tg cmpgs
moe closel to eho chge ojectes. i d detses e slow to dopt ew
techqes, dect mketes who dd’t do mch Tv eoe wll come to the mket.
SuPPLeMenTAL MATeRIAL
MtdlyForrester’s September 2009 Global Marketing Leadership Online Survey was elded to 79 marketing
leadership proessionals rom our ongoing Marketing & Strategy Research Panel. Te panel consists
o volunteers who join on the basis o interest and amiliarity with specic marketing and strategy
topics. For quality assurance, panelists are required to provide contact inormation and answer basic
questions about their rms’ revenue and budgets.
Forrester elded the survey rom September to October 2009. Respondent incentives included a
summary o the survey results.
Exact sample sizes are provided in this report on a question-by-question basis. Panels are not
guaranteed to be representative o the population. Unless otherwise noted, statistical data is
intended to be used or descriptive and not inerential purposes.
I you’re interested in joining one o Forrester’s research panels, you may visit us at http://Forrester.
com/Panel.
Forrester’s July 2009 Global Marketing Leadership Online Survey was elded to 75 marketing
leadership proessionals rom our ongoing Marketing & Strategy Research Panel. Te panel consists
o volunteers who join on the basis o interest and amiliarity with specic marketing and strategy
topics. For quality assurance, panelists are required to provide contact inormation and answer basic
questions about their rms’ revenue and budgets.
Forrester elded the survey rom July to August 2009. Respondent incentives included a summary
o the survey results.
Exact sample sizes are provided in this report on a question-by-question basis. Panels are not
guaranteed to be representative o the population. Unless otherwise noted, statistical data is
intended to be used or descriptive and not inerential purposes.
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 14/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto Pohted J 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
13
I you’re interested in joining one o Forrester’s research panels, you may visit us at http://Forrester.
com/Panel.
Cmpais Itrviwd Fr Tis Dcmt
Acxiom Corporation
Arbitron
Cablevision
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC)
Canoe Ventures
Carat
ClearSaleing
Ensequence
Experian
First ennessee Bank
IAC/InterActiveCorp
Johnson & Johnson
L’Oréal
Merkle
NDS
Nielsen
OMD
Prudential
Simulmedia
Starcom
Te Allant Group
RA
Visible World
Yahoo!
Yellow Book
enDnoTeS
1 Print advertising will total $44 billion and radio $16.5 billion in 2009. Source: Forrester Research Online
Advertising And Classieds Forecast, 4/09 (US only).
2 Marketing leaders must work with their teams, agencies, and media partners to update their vision
o integrated marketing in order to counter the eects o the meltdown and to harness social media.
omorrow’s integrated marketing blends multichannel branded content with social media and strives to
create a media analysis eedback inrastructure to enable message and media tuning on the y. See the
August 24, 2009, “Te Media Meltdown Makes Integrated Marketing An Imperative” report.
3 In 2009, paid search will total $12.9 billion o the $25.1 billion US online advertising market. Almost 60%
o the $7.8 billion in online display ad spending is perormance based. (Classieds account or the other
$4.4 billion o online advertising spending.) Source: Forrester Research Online Advertising And Classieds
Forecast, 4/09 (US only).
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 15/16
© 2010, Foeste resech, ic. repodcto PohtedJ 15, 2010
The Fte O Med Mesemet
Fo Mketg Ledeshp Poessols
14
4 Pre-roll, mid-roll, and post-roll ads oer easy entry or brand advertisers amiliar with the production and
purchase process or television ads; online video ollows the same approach. Plus, prolieration o online
video content and advances in video players and ad servers means better inventory, more consumer usage,
and better measurement or advertisers. See the July 6, 2009, “US Interactive Marketing Forecast, 2009 o2014” report.
5 Nearly 60% o the marketing leaders with V budgets whom we surveyed liked the idea o running V spots
online. argeted V ads were also popular. Source: June 2009 Global Marketing Leadership Online Survey.
6 Tis happens every 10 years or so. In 1988, the V networks tried to und a Nielsen alternative, and in 1999,
the Committee on Nationwide elevision Audience Measurement abandoned a $50 million project. Source:
Gale Metzger, “Will the Industry Pay wice?” MediaPost , October 5, 2009 (http://www.mediapost.com/
publications/index.cm?a=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=114847).
7 Like Nielsen, magazine measurement vendor MRI is beginning to integrate campaign eectiveness data via
its Gf Starch acquisition.8 Attribution oerings rom vendors are appearing in various parts o the interactive marketing value chain,
including site analytics tools, ad-serving tools, intelligence dashboards, and media-buying services. See the
October 20, 2009, “Te Interactive Attribution Landscape” report; see the July 28, 2008 “Attribution” report;
and see the February 19, 2009, “A Framework For Multicampaign Attribution Measurement” report.
8/3/2019 future_of_media_measurement Forr 110
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/futureofmediameasurement-forr-110 16/16
Forrester Research, Inc. (Nasdaq: FORR)
is an independent research company
that provides pragmatic and orward-
thinking advice to global leaders in
business and technology. Forrester
works with proessionals in 20 key roles
at major companies providing
proprietary research, customer insight,
consulting, events, and peer-to-peerexecutive programs. For more than 26
years, Forrester has been making IT,
marketing, and technology industry
leaders successul every day. For more
inormation, visit www.orrester.com.
Headquarters
Forrester Research, Inc.
400 Technology Square
Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
Tel: +1 617.613.6000
Fax: +1 617.613.5000
Email: [email protected]
Nasdaq symbol: FORR
www.orrester.com
M k g L e d e s S c c e s s l E e D
For inormation on hard-copy or electronic reprints, please contact Client Support
at +1 866.367.7378, +1 617.613.5730, or [email protected].
We oer quantity discounts and special pricing or academic and nonprot institutions.
For a complete list of worldwide locations
visit www.forrester.com/about.
Research and Sales Ofces
Forrester has research centers and sales ofces in more than 27 cities
internationally, including Amsterdam; Cambridge, Mass.; Dallas; Dubai;
Foster City, Cali.; Frankurt; London; Madrid; Sydney; Tel Aviv; and Toronto.