fundref webinar
TRANSCRIPT
Kirsty MeddingsProduct Manager
10th November 2015
Funding dataWhat, why and how?
A not-for-profit scholarly publishing membership organization working to make content easy to
find, cite, link, and assess.
Over 5000 diverse members All disciplines, many business models
77 million DOIs, many content types
Funding data at Crossref
A standard way of reporting funding sources for published scholarly research
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure"> <p>This work was supported in part by NIH
grant R01 GM094800B to G.J.J., a gift to Caltech from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and a stipend
from the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung to M.P. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and
analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.</p>
</fn> </fn-group>
</back></article>
<body>
... <sec> <title>Funding</title> <p>This work was supported by the <grant-sponsor xlink:href="http://www.grf.org" id="GS1">Generic Research Foundation</grant-sponsor>, the <grant-sponsor xlink:href="http://www.energy.gov" id="GS2">Department of Energy</grant- sponsor> Office of Science grant number <grant-num rid="GS2">DE-FG02- 04ER63803</grant-num>, and the <grant-sponsor xlink:href="http://www.nih.gov" id="GS3">National Institutes of Health</grant-sponsor>. </p> </sec> </body>
National Institutes of Health
NIH
N.I.H.
National Institute of Health
National Institute for Health
Abbreviations, misspellings, translations...
Why does this matter?
Funding bodies cannot easily track the published output of funding
Why does this matter?
Funding bodies cannot easily track the published output of funding
Publishers cannot easily report which articles result from research supported by specific funders or grants
Why does this matter?
Funding bodies cannot easily track the published output of funding
Publishers cannot easily report which articles result from research supported by specific funders or grants
Institutions cannot easily link funding received to published output
Why does this matter?
Funding bodies cannot easily track the published output of funding
Publishers cannot easily report which articles result from research supported by specific funders or grants
Institutions cannot easily link funding received to published output
Lack of standard metadata for funding sources makes it difficult to analyse or data mine
Why does this matter?
Publishers
Relationship with authors submitting
manuscripts
Established publishing and peer-review
systems
Funders
Relationship with researchers funded by
agencies
Established award systems and research
management processesCrossref
FundRef Pilot
Open Funder Registry
Open Funder Registry
Open Funder Registry
11,500 funder names and ID numbers from curated Elsevier SciVal registry
Open Funder Registry
11,500 funder names and ID numbers from curated Elsevier SciVal registry
Hosted by Crossref, available under CC0
Open Funder Registry
11,500 funder names and ID numbers from curated Elsevier SciVal registry
Hosted by Crossref, available under CC0
Updated and extended regularly
Open Funder Registry
11,500 funder names and ID numbers from curated Elsevier SciVal registry
Hosted by Crossref, available under CC0
Updated and extended regularly
Publishers use this list to ensure consistency
Open Funder Registry
11,500 funder names and ID numbers from curated Elsevier SciVal registry
Hosted by Crossref, available under CC0
Updated and extended regularly
Publishers use this list to ensure consistency
www.crossref.org/fundref/fundref_registry.html
FunderRegistry
FunderRegistry
Publisher
Submission System
Grant Number
Funder
FunderRegistry
Publisher
Submission System
Grant Number
Funder ProductionSystems
FunderRegistry
Publisher
Submission System
Grant Number
Funder ProductionSystems
CrossrefDatabase & Query APIs
FunderRegistry
Publisher
Submission System
Grant Number
Funder ProductionSystems
CrossrefDatabase & Query APIs
FundersResearchersInstitutionsPublishers
FunderRegistry
Publisher
Submission System
Grant Number
Funder ProductionSystems
CrossrefDatabase & Query APIs
FundersResearchersInstitutionsPublishers
Publisher
Production Systems/Typesetter
FunderRegistry
Publisher
Production Systems/Typesetter
FunderRegistry
Publisher
Production Systems/Typesetter
CrossrefDatabase & Query APIs
FunderRegistry
Publisher
Production Systems/Typesetter
CrossrefDatabase & Query APIs
FundersResearchersInstitutionsPublishers
FunderRegistry
Publisher
Production Systems/Typesetter
CrossrefDatabase & Query APIs
FundersResearchersInstitutionsPublishers
DOI
Funding Source
Award Number
DOI
Funding Source
Award Number
Implementation1. Collect funding data using Funder Registry taxonomy
“The information submitted here should match the information provided in the paper’s acknowledgement section.”
Implementation1. Collect funding data from authors on submission using
Open Funder Registry taxonomy
http://www.crossref.org/fundref
http://labs.crossref.org
ImplementationWidget - http://labs.crossref.org
Implementation2. Pass funding data from submission system to production
systems
Publisher
Submission System
Grant Number
Funder
Implementation2. Pass funding data from submission system to production
systems
Publisher
Submission System
Grant Number
Funder ProductionSystems
Implementation3. Deposit funding data with Crossref
CrossMark participants should deposit funding data within CrossMark deposits
CrossMark participation recommended for standard display of funding information
Implementation3. Deposit funding data with CrossRef
“funder_identifier”>http://dx.doi.org/10.13039.100000001
Implementation3. Deposit funding data with Crossref
Implementation3. Deposit funding data with Crossref
http://help.crossref.org
Funder IDs are Critical
Deposits with no funder ID will not be visible in FundRef Search or API
Crossref will attempt to match deposits with funder_name only, but this is only picking up 20% of deposits
The other 80% of funding data deposits with no IDs remain invisible
Best practices: http://bit.ly/1Qf7R54
http://search.crossref.org
http://api.crossref.org
http://api.crossref.org
Allows other systems to access the funding data
API Access
Latest Stats
180+ publishers & societies
600,000+ DOI deposits
11,500 funders in registry
Crossref’s database is the only central source of standardised funding acknowledgement metadata from publications
Accuracy of funding metadata is critical
An increasing number of organizations and projects rely on this funding data to identify content and check compliance with funder policies
Get involved and make the funding data from your publications available, accurate and transparent
Summary
Publishers: deposit now!
No fees for funding data deposits
Everyone else: no action required!
No need to “join” - querying freely available
www.crossref.org/[email protected]
Thank you