fundamentals of municipal economic development
TRANSCRIPT
FUNDAMENTALS OF MUNICIPAL ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENTA Transformational Approach
Presented to the Town of WashingtonApril 28, 2016
(c) CERC2016
Program Development Team
2
(c) CERC2016
Curriculum
1. Definitions of economic development – transactions and transformations
2. Municipal economic indicators in a regional and state context
3. Roles and responsibilities of the town’s economic development team
4. Economic development capacity assessment tool and next steps
3
SECTION 1Definitions of Economic
Development
4
(c) CERC2016
Framing Our Discussion - Illustrative Questions About Economic Development Activities
What is economic development? Why should you care?
Is there a difference between economic development, community development, and real estate development?
How does your town fit into the broader regional & global economy?
What defines the economic future (vision and goals) of the region/town?
What are your strengths and weaknesses?
What are the needs of local businesses?
Who are the stakeholders and partners?
How do different audiences perceive development and how do you communicate?
What is your reputation in the economic development market? (How does your regulatory environment impact development?)
What are the threats to the fiscal health of your community? Can you afford the things you want?
5
(c) CERC2016
Economic Development DefinitionsGrowth vs. Development
Grand list growth
Change in the quality of the town’s assets
One size fits all or different approaches
6
(c) CERC2016
Economic Development DefinitionsKey Trends
■ Changing world of economic development – the playing field = the world
■ Regions are units of economic competition
■ Business turnover – jobs churning
■ Connected workforce
■ “Economic Development” – all areas of community’s development
■ Changing roles of urban centers, suburbs and rural areas (seniors and millennials)
7
(c) CERC2016
Economic Development DefinitionsReal Estate Development
8
■ Real estate development is transactional - one piece of a comprehensive approach to economic development.
■ Economic development is becoming more transformative.
■ Towns and developers need help in speaking the same language.
■ Transactions need to fit into a community’s transformational goals.
■ Knowing the real estate assets and market is important.
(c) CERC2016
©2015
9
(c) CERC2016
Traditional Economic Development Definitions: Recruitment, Retention, Expansion
10
■ Business retention is your community’s best option.
■ Entrepreneur support is a good option.
■ Keep business recruitment in perspective.
■ Understand your economic base.
(c) CERC2016
Economic Development Marketing
■ Desired outcomes
■ Elevator speech
■ Common understanding of what the town is (and unique attributes)
■ Business recruitment
11
(c) CERC2016
Transactional
Do the deal
Make the numbers work
Get building permit and other approvals
Not much community input
Focused on specific property
Looking for financial incentives
Cost/benefit – fiscal impact
Transformational
Interdisciplinary approaches
Creating attractive and inviting places
More complex and comprehensive ways of measuring success
Measure real community‐wide benefits and outcomes, not just activity
Consistent with community vision
12
Economic Development DefinitionsTransactional vs. Transformational
Be self aware enough through planning, strategy development to know what transactions fit with your community vision.
(c) CERC2016
Business Perspective on Local Government
“We want to locate where we are wanted, where government appreciates our contribution to the economy, and values local ownership, where people understand that it is a good thing for the community if we make money. We want to work with officials who are focused on growing the economic pie, and who value our business activity because we export goods and services out of the Pioneer Valley, yet the profits stay in the valley. We want local government to create a favorable playing field for all business activity, and to be active in keeping track of the “customer satisfaction level” of its businesses. We want to be in a town where government is strategically focused on providing a business‐friendly place.” – The Holman Doctrine
13
One example to illustrate the difference: Different approaches to development of a pharmacy
One example to illustrate the difference: Different approaches to development of a pharmacy
©2015
(c) CERC2016
Housing as a Component of Economic Development and Community Fiscal Health
■ Largest component of the grand list
■ Housing stock, beautiful but expensive
■ Lack of a diversity of housing choices
18
Economic Development Choices: DensityWe have nothing to fear but fear itself… courtesy of CT Main Street Center
19
(c) CERC2016
Placemaking
■ Community centric – building consensus, collaboration & empowered citizens
■ Public spaces – plan, design, manage and program
■ Social capital
■ Cultural, economic, social, ecological
■ Capitalized on community assets
20
(c) CERC2016
10 Placemaking Principles
1. Community is the expert
2. Create a place, not a design
3. Partners
4. Observe
5. Vision
6. Short term improvements
7. Triangulate
8. “It can be done”
9. Form supports function
10. You are never finished
21Source: Project for Public Spaces
Asheville Big Box vs. Downtown Mixed‐Use
Development
Economic Development Choices: Big Box vs. Main Street Development
22
Courtesy of CT Main Street Center
(c) CERC2016
Your Place in a Broader Economy
■ Local success linked to regional/global success
■ Know your role - How do you define your economic region?
■ What regional assets can help sell your community?
■ Urban center
■ Suburb – primarily residential
■ Rural
■ Polycentric nodal regions
■ Unique asset – connections to large metros (NYC)
23
SECTION 2Overview of Municipal
Economic Indicators in a Regional and State Context
24
(c) CERC2016
Total Population
27,121
8,9838,316
3,422 3,5962,858 2,301 2,136 1,824 1,254
28,142
8,9908,466
3,607 3,5782,979
2,388 2,262 1,727 1,461
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
New Milford Woodbridge Litchfield Bethlehem Washington Kent Morris Roxbury Bridgewater Warren
2000 2010
25Source: Decennial census. U.S. Census Bureau. 2000, 2010.
(c) CERC2016
Density (Residents per Sq. Mile)
742.8
201.0
91.6
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Connecticut Litchfield Cty Washington
26Source: Municipal Fiscal Indicators. CT Office of Policy and Management. 2014.
(c) CERC2016
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
U.S. Connecticut Litchfield Cty Washington
Two or moreraces
Some otherrace (thanlisted below)
Asian or PacificIslander
AmericanIndian orAlaska Native
Black or AfricanAmerican
White
Latino orHispanic
Population by Race and Ethnicity
27Source: American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010-2014.
(c) CERC2016
Population by Age
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Washington
Litchfield Cty
Connecticut
U.S.
Under 19 20 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 and over
28Source: American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010-2014.
(c) CERC2016
Population by Educational Attainment
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Washington
Litchfield Cty
Connecticut
U.S.
Less Than 12th Grade High School Graduate Some College
Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Graduate Degree
29Source: American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010-2014.
(c) CERC2016
Distribution of Household Income
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Washington
Litchfield Cty
Connecticut
U.S.
Under $50K $50K-$75K $75K-$100K $100K-$150K Over $150K
30Source: American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010-2014.
(c) CERC2016
Where Residents Work (Top 10)
Washington25.3%
New Milford11.3%
Danbury 5.7%
Torrington 2.9%
Litchfield 2.3%
Waterbury 2.2%Roxbury 2.0%Manhattan 2.0%Brookfield 1.7%
Southbury 1.7%
All Other Locations42.8%
31Source: LEHD Origin Destination Employment Statistics. U.S. Census Bureau. 2013.
(c) CERC2016
Where Workers Live (Top 10)
Washington25.4%
New Milford13.3%
Torrington 6.7%
Litchfield 4.9%Woodbury3.6%
Danbury 3.5%Bethlehem 2.8%
Warren 2.5%
Watertown 2.2%Roxbury 1.7%
All Other Locations33.4%
32Source: LEHD Origin Destination Employment Statistics. U.S. Census Bureau. 2013.
(c) CERC2016
Unemployment Rate
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Connecticut Litchfield Cty Washington
33Source: Local Area Unemployment Statistics. CT Dept. of Labor. Not Seasonally Adjusted.
(c) CERC2016
Largest Industries by Employment
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Accomm. andFood Services
EducationalServices
Government Retail Trade Arts,entertainment,
and rec.
Other Services Admin. andWaste
Services
Construction Prof. andTech. Services
Finance andinsurance
U.S. Connecticut Litchfield Cty Washington
34Source: Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. CT Dept. of Labor. 2014.
(c) CERC2016
Most Common Occupations of Workers
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
Education,Training, and
Library
FoodPreparationand Serving
Office andAdministrative
Support
Sales andRelated
Management Building andGrounds
Cleaning andMaintenance
Transportationand Material
Moving
Arts, Design,Entertainment,
Sports, andMedia
Constructionand Extraction
Personal Careand ServiceOccupations
U.S. Connecticut Litchfield Cty Washington
35Source: Occupational Employment Statistics Derived Estimates. Economic Modeling Specialists International. 2014.
(c) CERC2016
Types of Employment
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Washington
Litchfield Cty
Connecticut
U.S.
Self-employed and unpaid family workers Private employers Government
36Source: American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010-2014.
(c) CERC2016
Equalized Net Grand List
Residential real estate
75.0%
Commercial real estate
4.0%
Motor vehicle3.0%
Personal property
1.0%
Other 17.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Connecticut Litchfield Cty Washington
Residential real estate Commercial real estate
Motor vehicle Personal property
Other
37Source: Municipal Fiscal Indicators. CT Office of Policy and Management. 2012.
(c) CERC2016
Equalized Net Grand List Per Capita
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Connecticut Washington Roxbury Torrington
38Source: Municipal Fiscal Indicators. CT Office of Policy and Management. 2012.
(c) CERC2016
Bonded Long-Term Debt Per Capita
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
2007 2008 2009 20010 2011 2012
Connecticut Litchfield Town Roxbury Washington
39Source: Municipal Fiscal Indicators. CT Office of Policy and Management. 2012.
(c) CERC2016
Debt as a Percent of Grand List
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Connecticut Litchfield Town Roxbury Washington
40Source: Municipal Fiscal Indicators. CT Office of Policy and Management. 2012.
(c) CERC2016
Occupied or Vacant Housing
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Washington
Litchfield Cty
Connecticut
U.S.
Occupied Vacant-other Vacant-seasonal, recreational, or other use
41Source: American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010-2014.
(c) CERC2016
Owner- or Renter-Occupied Housing
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Washington
Litchfield Cty
Connecticut
U.S.
Owner-occupied Renter-occupied
42Source: American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010-2014.
(c) CERC2016
Homeowners with Mortgages
70.6% 70.0%
62.5%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
Connecticut Litchfield Cty Washington
43Source: American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010-2014.
(c) CERC2016
Affordable Housing as Percent of Occupied Units
11.3%
6.3%
2.4%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
Connecticut Litchfield Cty Washington
44Source: Housing Data Profiles. Connecticut Partnership for Strong Communities. 2013.
(c) CERC2016
Age of Housing Stock
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Washington
Litchfield Cty
Connecticut
U.S.
2010+ 2000s 1970-1999 1940-1969 pre-1940
45Source: American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010-2014.
(c) CERC2016
Value of Owner-Occupied Housing
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Washington
Litchfield Cty
Connecticut
U.S.
Less than $50K $50K-$100K $100K-$200K $200K-$300K
$300K-$500K $500K-$1M Over $1M
46Source: American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010-2014.
SECTION 3Roles and Responsibilities of
the Town’s Economic Development Team
47
(c) CERC2016
Roles and Responsibilities
■ Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD) –vision
■ Taking a pulse– Primary assets– Challenges in the next ten years– Game changers
48
(c) CERC2016
Who is on the team?
■ Reminder of who is on the team:– Elected officials/municipal offices
– Boards and commissions (P&Z, conservation, etc.)
– Business community and citizens
– Schools and universities
– Chambers, nonprofits and regional ED organizations
– Advocates: housing, transportation, preservationists, environmentalists
– Product/service providers: developers and real estate community, site selectors/consultants
– Government: state and federal
49
(c) CERC2016
Economic Development Commission & Staff■ Adopt strategic plan of economic development
■ Promote economic development in town and contribute to plan of conservation & development
■ Identify areas of town for development
■ Make recommendations to voting boards in town
■ Initiate an application to change a zoning district, propose an economic development zone, present proposed regulations
■ Appear before other land use commissions meeting and present position
■ Review all other commissions agendas and minutes to keep abreast of developments and timelines
50
(c) CERC2016
Components of a Successful Economic Development Program
■ Business visitation
■ Liaison between the business and the town
■ Ambassador efforts and partnerships
■ Single point of contact for business
■ Realistic understanding of the current economic situation in your community
■ Know your competitive advantages
■ Business attraction
■ Workforce strategy that includes businesses, colleges and high school
51
(c) CERC2016
Components of a Successful Economic Development Program
■ Marketing (eNews, social media, CERC SiteFinder®)
■ Intergovernmental relations – Know your reps, grants
■ Financing solutions – DECD, local banks
■ Incentives – both local and state
■ Heritage tourism – Enhances quality of life
■ Shovel-ready initiatives – DOT permits, wetlands flagging, utility extensions
■ Utility economic development tools
■ Useful data
52
(c) CERC2016
Components of a Successful Economic Development Program
■ Town Center/Other Commercial Areas– Main Street Four Point Approach - CMSC
■ Organization
■ Design
– Form Based Code, Village District, Streetscape, Facades
■ Promotion
■ Economic Restructuring
– Market Analysis– Building Inventory
■ Great downtowns don’t just happen – they are created!
53
(c) CERC2016
What the Process Should Be When You Have a Live One
■ Predictable
■ Clear
■ Reliable
■ Consistent
■ Effective (Does the right thing)
■ Efficient (Does things right)
54
One of the best business incentives is astreamlined regulatory process.
(c) CERC2016
Next Steps
■ What did you learn?
■ Where do you go from here?
55
(c) CERC2016
Contact Us
CERC.com, @CERCInc
CEDAS.org, @CTCEDAS