fundamental physics. may 3rd 2006 1 clive speake g.hammond, a. matthews, f.pena, s. aston, e.rocco....
TRANSCRIPT
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
1
Clive SpeakeG.Hammond, A. Matthews, F.Pena, S. Aston, E.Rocco.
Gravitation Group, University of Birmingham.
• Motivation
• Brief overview of laboratory tests of gravitation
• Work at University of Birmingham
• Summary
Precision tests of gravity: Particle physics at Precision tests of gravity: Particle physics at the low energy Frontier.the low energy Frontier.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
2
Motivation• Standard Model of Particle Physics successfully
describes Electro-weak and Strong interactions up to ~102 GeV.
• Standard Model of Cosmology (founded on classical General Relativity) successfully ‘explains’ observations of the Universe from a second or so after ‘Big-Bang’.
BUT...
rqq
Vem21
041 r
mmGV Ng
21
rnn
cM
mV
p
f
g21
2
2
rnn
cc
eVem
21
0
2
4
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
3
But...• Gravitation cannot be renormalised like the other quantum interactions as there
is no mf in nature.
• The natural scale for a quantum theory of gravity is the Planck scale: Mpc2~1019GeV. What happens between the Electro-Weak scale and the Planck scale (16 orders of energy)? Hierarchy problem.
• We need new symmetries eg Supersymmetry, Peccei-Quinn symmetry, but we have no direct evidence for these.
• Cosmology needs Dark Matter but we have not observed it yet.
• We require the majority of the mass/energy density of the Universe to consist of a zero-point fluctuation vacuum energy: Dark Energy.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
4
Motivation
• Recent attempts at solving these problems suggest the possibility of new macroscopic forces.
• New gauge symmetries and conserved quantities lead to new forces eg axion, new forces coupling to conserved charges B, B-L.
• String theories predict a number of phenomena: macroscopic compactified dimensions, dilaton, moduli and others...
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
5
T
Generic form of new interactions
• Assume a Yukawa-type potential:
• with
• mm for mbc2~0.2 meV
/rni e
rqq
gcV 212
cm/ b
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
6Adapted From Smith and Lewin 1990.
weak Force Physics
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
7
Tests of gravitation
• Equivalence Principle.
• Searches for G-dot.
• Macroscopic forces coupling to intrinsic spin: search for axion-like particles, search for cosmic spin fields, breakdown of Lorentz invariance.
• Inverse square law/ Casimir force.
For a review see Gundlach New J. Phys. 7 205 (2005)
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
8
Superconducting Torsion Balance
Cavendish Balance (1798-Present) Birmingham Instrumentin Casimir mode (1998-Present)
Based on Meissner effect zero stiffness suspension utilising Niobium Temperature of 4.2K Lift capacity 600g Superconducting magnetic torque feedback. We will eventually utilise a novel homodyne interferometric readout MkI Noise 10-13Nm/Hz Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 955 (2004)
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
9
The Spherical Superconducting Torsion Balance:
Levitation Bearing
Float
Cryogenic analogue of a spherical air-bearing
Copper shell 0.2mm, coated with Pb, (Nb).
Hard drawn Nb wire.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
10Piezo
Sphere-Plane
Float
Interferometer
Spark eroded Nb foil feedback coils
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
11
Interferometer development for SSTB
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
12
Birmingham interferometer for LISA:Schematic of first prototype.
C&QG 2005
A1,2 Polarising BeamsplitterB /4 PlateC Non-Polarising BeamsplitterD PlatePD1,2,3 PhotodiodeP PolariserL1,2,3 Lens
Laser Diode
A1
B
C
B
A2
PD
PD1
PD2PD3
Proof Mass
Reference Mirror
L3L2L1Main beamsplitter
Cat’s eye
A2
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
13
Birmingham Interferometer:
First prototype (40x70x25mm).
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
14
Birmingham interferometer: Performance.
Using a 664nm VCSEL with 60 nW of optical power on diodes. Shot noise limited above 20 Hz.
Nominally equal optical path lengths.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
15
Casimir’s Calculation
• Zero-point energy of modes between plates of dimension L:
z
x
d
zyxzyxk,k,k yxk,k,k
z,y,x
dn
kkc)d(E2
2222
22
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
16
Shortcomings of Casimir’s analysis
• Thermal Correction
When , corresponding to d=7m at room temperature,
. thermal photons contribute to Casimir force.
• How to model conductivity of real metals?
• Roughness correction
• Electrostatic forces due to patch-potentials.
kTc
d
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
17
• Conductivity, roughness, thin film and patch-potential corrections are minimised by using larger spacings between conductors. But force is smaller!
• The controversial thermal correction is minimised at larger separations at 4K.
• Plasmons have larger effect at shorter spacing?
Reynaud and Lambrecht et al 2001
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
18
Birmingham work
• Assuming sensitivity of Mk1 device (Hammond et al 2004), we can resolve 0.5% of Casimir force at 4m in 1 hour (R=10cm).
• Aim at ‘precision’ determination of Casimir force 0.1%.
• Crucial to damp parasitic modes of oscillation:
– horizontal and vertical translational modes damped using copper-cored inductor in series with levitation bearing.
– Simple pendulum mode damped using copper disk attached to the inside of float at its pole with superconducting electromagnet.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
19
Experimental Tests of Newton’s law• University of Washington
• Currently testing Newtonian gravity at 150m.
• Aiming at 50m.
• Employ conducting membrane as electrostatic shield between source and test mass.
Eot-wash website
Source mass
Test mass
Optical leverTorsion fibre
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
20
Birmingham work in progress
• Push to shorter ranges by dispensing with the electrostatic shield.
• Use transverse geometry to eliminate forces due to long and short range electrostatic interactions and Casimir force
• Exploit novel features of Spherical Superconducting torsion balance being developed at University of Birmingham.
np
nPP zC
z
cE
2
1720 3
2
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
21
Long range stick-slip piezo
Modulated masses
Test of the inverse square law:
Basic concept
Centre of simple pendulum motion coincides with centre of buoyancy.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
22
Source/Test mass manufacture at RAL
Al mandrill
150m deep
400m pitch, 50% fill.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
23
Source/Test mass manufacture at RAL
Electroplate with Au. Cover Al relief.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
24
Source/Test mass manufacture at RAL
Skim off the top layer to uncover Al.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
25
Source/Test mass manufacture at RAL
Sputter coat Au to thickness of 3m
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
26
Source/Test mass manufacture at RAL
Dissolve Al mandrill.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
27
Al mandrill
Au plating prior to skimming
Courtesy of Peter Huggard, RAL.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
28
Current Status
• We have completed development of Mk2 SSTB with capacitative angular readout.
• Current sensitivity is limited by capacitive sensor noise. This can be improved.
• Completion of cryogenic interferometer is due in 2-3 months.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
29
Parametrisation of violation of inverse square law
/r
ni ermGm
V 121
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
30
moduli
Dilaton
Radion Vacuum energy scenario
2 compact extra dimensions
Possible signals
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
31
Potential upper limits
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
32
Summary
• Ideas beyond the Standard Model of Particle physics and, perhaps, also that of Cosmology are needed to make sense of gravity.
• Searches for new weak interactions are complementary to direct searches for new bosons in particle accelerators.
• Fundamental physics experiments in the lab or, perhaps, space can contribute.
Fundamental Physics. May 3rd 2006
33
Acknowledgements
• PPARC
• EPSRC
• BAE
• Leverhulme