functionalization of carbon nanotubes by potassium permanganate assisted with phase transfer...

Upload: samarabermeo

Post on 07-Jul-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes by Potassium Permanganate Assisted With Phase Transfer Catalyst

    1/5

    This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text.

    Download details:

    IP Address: 200.129.163.72

    This content was downloaded on 26/01/2015 at 14:43

    Please note that terms and conditions apply.

    Functionalization of carbon nanotubes by potassium permanganate assisted with phase

    transfer catalyst

    View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more

    2002 Smart Mater. Struct. 11 962

    (http://iopscience.iop.org/0964-1726/11/6/318)

    ome Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_3/iopscience.iop.org/page/termshttp://iopscience.iop.org/0964-1726/11/6http://iopscience.iop.org/0964-1726http://iopscience.iop.org/http://iopscience.iop.org/searchhttp://iopscience.iop.org/collectionshttp://iopscience.iop.org/journalshttp://iopscience.iop.org/page/aboutioppublishinghttp://iopscience.iop.org/contacthttp://iopscience.iop.org/myiopsciencehttp://iopscience.iop.org/myiopsciencehttp://iopscience.iop.org/contacthttp://iopscience.iop.org/page/aboutioppublishinghttp://iopscience.iop.org/journalshttp://iopscience.iop.org/collectionshttp://iopscience.iop.org/searchhttp://iopscience.iop.org/http://iopscience.iop.org/0964-1726http://iopscience.iop.org/0964-1726/11/6http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_3/iopscience.iop.org/page/terms

  • 8/18/2019 Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes by Potassium Permanganate Assisted With Phase Transfer Catalyst

    2/5

    INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING   SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES

    Smart Mater. Struct. 11 (2002) 962–965 PII: S0964-1726(02)55164-8

    Functionalization of carbon nanotubes bypotassium permanganate assisted withphase transfer catalyst

    Nanyan Zhang, Jining Xie and Vijay K Varadan

    Center for the Engineering of Electronic and Acoustic Materials and Devices, Pennsylvania

    State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA

    Received 24 June 2002Published 4 November 2002Online at stacks.iop.org/SMS/11/962

    AbstractAn improved process is presented to functionalize carbon nanotubes bypotassium permanganate with the help of phase transfer catalyst (PTC). ThePTC helps to extract potassium permanganate from the solid phase to anorganic solvent phase and improves the efficiency of nanotube oxidation.The higher reaction efficiency as well as mild reaction conditions leads to ahigher yield of functional nanotube preparation. X-ray photoelectronspectroscopy confirms the functional groups attached to the nanotubesurface. A preliminary comparison is given of the potassium permanganateoxidation of nanotubes with and without PTC. This method is believed to bea potential economic method for large-scale functional nanotubepreparation.

    1. Introduction

    It is well known that carbon nanotubes have been expected

    to have versatile potential applications due to their novel

    structures and remarkable mechanical, thermal and electrical

    properties [1, 2]. Unfortunately, experimental confirmation

    of these applications has been hindered mainly by the poor

    processibility of carbon nanotubes. Because of the pure

    carbon element and their stable structure, carbon nanotubes

    are insoluble in any organic solvents, which makes it

    extremely difficult to explore their properties and applications.

    For example, carbon nanotubes are regarded as promising

    filler materials for a new generation of high performancenanocomposites because of their exceptionally high Young

    modulus [3], bending strength and low density. However, this

    composite processing is still limited to bench-top processing

    and has been hampered by high viscosity of available matrix

    materials, lack of dispersion and excessive porosity.

    To overcome this problem, chemical modification on

    the carbon nanotube surface is regarded as the best method.

    Chemical functionalization of carbon nanotubes is expected

    to play an essential role in tailoring the properties of 

    material. After functionalization, with the help of functional

    groups attached to the surfaces, carbon nanotubes could react

    readily with other chemical reagents and form homogenous

    dispersions or even well aligned materials.

    Graphite will undergo fluorination and oxidation

    completely under certain conditions, which leads to the loss

    of its most interesting properties. To meet the requirement

    of nanotube functionalization, chemical reaction occurring on

    the surface must be controlled in a particular manner. In other

    words, we need thechemical modification of nanotubes as well

    as their initial properties. In this case, a reagent is desired to

    selectivelyattack some of theπ-bonds without bringing a total

    destruction of the graphene structures of the nanotubes.

    It is well documented that the chemistry of the fullerenes

    is characterized by addition reactions. The fullerenes undergo

    such reactions with relative ease because the conversion of 

    trigonal carbon atoms to tetrahedral carbon atoms servesto release the tremendous strain present in the spheroidal

    geometry [4]. For carbon nanotubes, because of the greater

    curvature, the caps are the sites of preferential reactivity. This

    is thereason whymanyresearchers haveused reactions to open

    the caps and insert various species into the nanotubes. As for

    chemical functionalization, functional groups are attached to

    the caps much more easily than to the walls. Therefore, the

    nondestructive attachment of functional groups to the walls of 

    nanotubes presents a further challenge to experiment.

    Permanganate has been used for decades as an oxidizer

    in organic chemical manufacturing [5]. The primary redox

    reaction under low pH for permanganate is given as MnO−4   +

    8H+ + 5e− →  Mn+2 + 4H2O. With excess permanganate,

    0964-1726/02/060962+04$30.00 © 2002 IOP Publishing Ltd Printed in the UK   962

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_3/stacks.iop.org/SMS/11/962http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_3/stacks.iop.org/SMS/11/962http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_3/stacks.iop.org/SMS/11/962

  • 8/18/2019 Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes by Potassium Permanganate Assisted With Phase Transfer Catalyst

    3/5

    Functionalization of carbon nanotubes by potassium permanganate assisted with phase transfer catalyst

    Mn2+ can be oxidized subsequently as 3Mn+2 + 2MnO−4   +

    2H2O → 5MnO2(s) + 4H+. Permanganate oxidation of many

    organic compounds can be achieved without cleavage of the

    carbon framework.

    In 1995, Hiura   et al   [6] reported the functionalization

    of carbon nanotubes during the purification process. In that

    experiment, potassium permanganate was used as the oxidant

    in the presence of sulfuric acid. This oxidation changes

    the chemical make-up of the reactive edge of the tips and

    perhaps even the outer (and the inner) layer of the nanotube.

    X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to studied

    the surface modification and indicated that about 15% of the

    carbonconstituting thenanotubes is bound to eitherhydroxy or

    carboxy groups. Clearly, not only the tips but also the surface

    of the outer layer were found to be covered with these species.

    Besides potassium permanganate, other oxidant reagents

    were tried to attach functional groups to nanotube surfaces by

    Satishkumar and his group in India [7], such as concentrated

    HNO3, concentrated H2SO4, aqua regia, superacid HF/BF3,

    aqueous OsO4, OsO4–NaIO4   etc. The concentration of the

    surface acid groups was found to be in the range of 2 × 1020–

    10× 1020 acid sites pergramof nanotubes, as shownin table 1.

    Liu etal [8]reporteda functionalizationmethod forsingle-

    walled nanotubes by using a mixture of concentrated sulfuric

    and nitric acids as the oxidant. Another purpose of this process

    is to cut nanotubes into short pieces. They also assumed the

    open ends to be terminated with many carboxylic acid groups.

    However, the methods mentioned above all suffered

    from low yield of the functionalization process. In this

    paper, we present an improved procedure to functionalize

    carbon nanotubes by potassium permanganate with the help

    of phase transfer catalyst (PTC). The higher yield of this

    functionalization process is the major advantage.

    2. Experiment

    The nanotube source used in this experiment was gained from

    the microwave CVD method. This method is based on the

    pyrolysis of acetylene by microwave heating on nano-sized

    cobalt particlesembeddedin zeolite, whichservesas a catalytic

    support. The average diameter of these multi-walled carbon

    nanotubes ranges from 20 to 30 nm [9]. After hydrofluoric

    acid treatment and air oxidation, the as-prepared nanotubes

    were purified and ready for the functionalization process.

    For comparison, the functionalization of nanotubes by

    potassium permanganate without PTC was also performed.

     Reaction 1.  0.12 g of purified nanotubes were dispersed

    in 20 ml of 0.5 M sulfuric acid by ultrasonic vibration in a

    two-necked flask equipped with a condenser and a dropping

    funnel. The suspension was refluxed in an oil bath at 120 ◦C

    with magnetic stirring. Meanwhile, 1.98 g of potassium

    permanganate was dissolved in 20 ml of 0.5 M sulfuric acid

    and this solution was added to the flask drop by drop. Then

    the reaction was kept at 120 ◦C for 3 h. After that, the

    resulting suspension was filtered, washed with concentrated

    hydrochloric acid and deionized water and then dried.

     Reaction 2.   0.12 g of purified nanotubes and 25 ml

    dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) were added to a 100 ml flask and

    the suspension was vibrated ultrasonically for 0.5 h. About

    1.0 g of phase transfer agent (Aliquat 336, from Aldrich) was

    Figure 1. Micrograph of SEM of carbon nanotubes afterfunctionalization.

    added, followed by 5 g of powdered potassium permanganate

    in small portions during a period of 2 h. 5 ml of acetic acid was

    also added. The mixture was then stirred vigorously overnight

    at room temperature. As the final step, the resulting material

    was gained afterfiltering, concentric HCl acid treatment, water

    washing and drying.

    A Hitachi 3000N scanning electron microscope (SEM)

    was used to investigate the morphology of the materials after

    functionalization. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)

    spectrum of f-CNTs wasobtained by using a Kratos Analytical

    XSA800 pci under 10−8–10−9 Torr vacuum.

    3. Results and discussion

    In the functionalization reaction, the colour of the suspension

    changes from dark purple to dark brown, indicating the

    transformation of Mn+7 to Mn+4. The functionalized

    nanotubes gained from both methods are dark in colour.

    The yield of the functionalized nanotubes in the reaction

    without PTC is about 35–40% in terms of the total weight of 

    starting material, which is consistent with the result reported

    by Hiura [6]. For the reaction with PTC, the yield of 

    functionalized nanotubes is about 65–70%, much higher than

    the yield of reaction 1.

    Scanning electron microscopy was used to investigate the

    carbon nanotube sample before and after functionalization. As

    shown in figure 1, the morphology of carbon nanotubes after

    functionalization preserves. No destruction was observed,

    which means carbon nanotubes are strong enough towithstand

    the functionalization process.

    We also found that thefunctionalizednanotubes from both

    methods could be well dispersed in many common organic

    solvents, such as ethanol, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone

    (MEK), dichloromethane, toluene etc. This phenomenon of 

    uniform nanotubedispersion in solvents is oneof theproperties

    of functionalized nanotubes. It has been reported that due to

    the nanoscale size, the high surface energy of nanotubes gives

    them a strong tendency to agglomerate. Even with the help of 

    ultrasonic vibration, the untreated nanotubes may not remain

    in any solvent in quiescent suspension. However, appropriate

    functionalized nanotubes can dramatically raise the stability

    of suspensions [10]. The functionalization process induces a

    negatively charged surface, particularly through the ionization

    of acidic surface groups. The resulting electrostatic repulsion

    leads to the stable uniform colloidal dispersion.

    963

  • 8/18/2019 Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes by Potassium Permanganate Assisted With Phase Transfer Catalyst

    4/5

    N Zhang et al

    Table 1. The concentration of the surface acid groups in the nanotubes opened by different oxidants [7]

    HNO3   H2SO4   Aqua regia KMnO4 (acid) KMnO4 (alkali) OsO4–NaIO4

    2.5 ×1020 6.7×1020 7.6×1020 8.3×1020 10×1020 5.2×1019

    (a)

    (b)

    Figure 2. XPS spectra of functionalized nanotubes. (a) XPSspectrum of functionalized nanotubes from reaction 1; (b) XPSspectrum of functionalizednanotubes from reaction 2.

    (This figure is in colour only in the electronic version)

    XPS, as oneof thesurfaceanalytical techniques, is capable

    of readily providing information about chemical bonding on

    the surface. XPS was performed on each functionalized

    nanotube sample to get the information of functional groups on

    the nanotube surface. Thus, the C 1s main peak was scanned

    in high resolution. In the curve fitting, the overall peak in the

    range of 283–289 eV can be fitted by a superposition of fourpeaks. The main peak (∼284.7 eV) is attributed to the C 1s,

    while the other three peaks are assigned to –C–O (286.1 eV),

    –C=O (287.5 eV) and –COO− (288.8 eV) respectively. The

    XPS spectra are shown in figure 2.

    As the qualitative result, XPS spectra show that both

    functional nanotubes have functional groups. The semi-

    quantitative analysis gives the rough atomic concentration of 

    carbon atoms functionalized. Table 2 gives the comparison of 

    semi-quantitative analysis of functional nanotubes.

    For f-nanotubes from reaction 1, the result indicates that

    about 12% of carbon atoms are bonded with an –OH group

    and 7.45% with a –COOH group. The f-nanotubes from reac-

    tion 2 have a higher concentration of –OH groups (∼23%) and

    a lower concentration of –COOH groups (∼3.8%). It is nec-

    essary to point out in this paper that this quantitative analysis

    of functional groups attached to nanotubes is at best semi-

    quantitative. These values can only give us rough information

    about the functional groups. The concentrations of the –OH

    group are higher than the values reported [6]. The reason may

    be the energy-loss tail in the C 1s peak. Also the trace amount

    of zeolite material in the purified nanotube material may be re-

    lated to the higher concentration of –OH groups. Much more

    accurate quantitative analysis of functionalized nanotubes is

    going to be performed in the near future.

    The higher yield of functionalized nanotubes is the major

    advantage of oxidation by potassium permanganate with PTC.

    Untreated nanotubes are hydrophobic and do not dispersewell in aqueous solvent. On the other hand, potassium

    permanganate is water soluble. In reaction 1, the hydrophobic

    property of nanotubes leads to the low efficiency of contact

    between nanotubes and potassium permanganate dissolved in

    water. Thus high reaction temperature, 120 ◦C, is necessary

    to increase the reaction rate of functionalization. However, at

    high temperature, potassium permanganate is a strong oxidant,

    which may destroy nanotube structure. This may be the reason

    for the low yield of functionalization.

    Phase transfer catalysis is based on the ability of catalytic

    amounts of the transfer agents to increase therate of a chemical

    reaction between reagents located in different phases of a

    reaction mixture [11]. In reaction 2, potassium permanganatecould be extracted into organic solvent (dichloromethane,

    where the nanotubes were suspended) by phase transfer agent.

    This process could substantially increase the reaction rate and

    efficiency. Therefore, the functionalization can be carried out

    undermild conditions. Fewer nanotubes being destroyed leads

    to higher yield. The function of acetic acid in the reaction is

    to neutralize the hydroxide ions formed to promote a more

    complete reaction [12]. We observed that without acetic acid,

    the resulting suspension is still dark purple after reaction and

    the quality of functionalized nanotubes is not acceptable.

    4. Conclusion

    Carbon nanotubes should be functionalized to explore their

    unique properties and potential applications. In this paper,

    potassium permanganate is used as an oxidant to functionalize

    multi-walled carbon nanotubes derived from the microwave

    CVD method. Unlike the conventional oxidation, PTC

    is introduced into the functionalization reaction, which

    drastically increases the efficiency of oxidation by potassium

    permanganate. The yieldof functionalization is improvedfrom

    ∼35to∼65%. XPS confirms the functional groups attached to

    the nanotube surface. This improved oxidation with the help

    of PTC could be a potential economic method to prepare high

    quality functional nanotubes on a large scale.

    964

  • 8/18/2019 Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes by Potassium Permanganate Assisted With Phase Transfer Catalyst

    5/5

    Functionalization of carbon nanotubes by potassium permanganate assisted with phase transfer catalyst

    Table 2. Semi-quantitative analysis of functionalized nanotubes. (Reaction 1, functionalization reaction by potassium permanganatewithout PTC; reaction 2, functionalization reaction by potassium permanganate with PTC.)

    f-nanotubes from reaction 1 f-nanotubes from reaction 2

    Peak Position (eV) Atomic conc. (%) Position (eV) Atomic conc. (%)

    C 1s 284.66 75.96 284.71 68.35–C–OH 286.33 12.63 286.12 23.60–COOH 289.00 7.45 288.91 3.82–C=O 287.62 3.96 287.54 4.23

    References

    [1] Iijima S 1991 Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon Nature354 56–8

    [2] Dresselhaus M S, Dresselhaus G and Saito R 1995 Physics of carbon nanotubes Carbon 33 883–91

    [3] Wong E W, Sheehan P E and Lieber C M 1997 Nanobeammechanics: elasticity, strength, and toughness of nanorodsand nanotubes Science 277 1971–5

    [4] Chen Y, Haddon R C, Fang S, Rao A M, Eklund P C, Lee WH, Dickey E C, Grulke E A, Pendergrass J C, Chavan A,

    Haley B E and Smalley R E 1998 Chemical attachment of organic functional groups to single-walled carbon nanotubematerial J. Mater. Res.  13 2423–31

    [5] Siegrist R L, Urynowicz M A, West O R, Crimi M L andLowe K S 2001 Principles and Practices of In SituChemical Oxidation Using Permanganate (Columbus, OH:Battelle)

    [6] Hiura H, Ebbesen T W and Tanigaki K 1995 Opening andpurification of carbon nanotubes in high yields  Adv. Mater.7 275–6

    [7] Satishkumar B C, Govindaraj A, Mofokeng J, Subbanna G Nand Rao C N R 1996 Novel experiments with carbonnanotubes: opening, filling, closing and functionalizingnanotubes J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.  294925–34

    [8] Liu J, Rinzler A G, Dai H, Hafner J H, Bradley R K, Boul P J,Lu A, Iverson T, Shelimov K, Huffman C B,Rodriguez-Macias F, Shon Y-S, Lee T R, Colbert D T andSmalley R E 1998 Fullerene pipes Science280 1253–6

    [9] Xie J, Sharma P K, Varadan V K and Varadan V V A novel

    method to synthesize multi-walled carbon nanotubes bymicrowave CVD Smart Mater. Struct. submitted

    [10] Shaffer M S P, Fan X and Windle A H 1998 Dispersion andpacking of carbon nanotubes Carbon 36 1603–12

    [11] Sasson Y and Neumann R 1997 Handbook of Phase Transfer Catalysis (London: Blackie)

    [12] Lee D G and Chang V S 1978 Oxidation of hydrocarbons.8.Use of dimethyl polyethylene glycol as a phase transferagent for the oxidation of alkenes by potassiumpermanganate J. Org. Chem.  43 1532–6

    965