functional model : mind the gap - prize presentation

26
Functional model: Mind the Gap Dr Ankush Singhal MBBS, MD (AIIMS), MRCPsych ST6 (General adult psychiatry) BIPA Annual Conference 2010

Upload: jp-rajendran

Post on 24-Jun-2015

1.465 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Dr Ankush Singhal

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Functional model: Mind the Gap

Dr Ankush Singhal MBBS, MD (AIIMS), MRCPsych

ST6 (General adult psychiatry)

BIPA Annual Conference 2010

Page 2: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation
Page 3: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

My ContributionConceived the idea and led the study.Literature review, the protocol and ethics

approval. Collected the data. Co-ordinated.Merged the data & analysed it.Prepared the manuscript and sent for publication. Revisions as first & corresponding author.Presented in RCPsych AGM, Liverpool and in my

Trust.

Page 4: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

BackgroundNWW: enabling consultant psychiatrists,

among others, to deliver effective and person-centred care.

Acute care pathway – CRHT + In-patient.Functional model.Acute in-patient psychiatry – a subspecialty?

Community consultant

In-patient consultant

Service user

Mind the gap

Page 5: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

AimTo investigate

health professionals’, service users’ and carers’

opinions about the provision of separate consultants

for in-patient settings and the community

Page 6: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

DesignMulticentre study : North Hertfordshire; the

south lakes region of Cumbria; and Winchester.

Tool semi-structured semi-qualitative questionnaire (paper and online version)

An information leaflet (without introducing any bias).

Page 7: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Data CollectionPersonally, by post and online.

Through CMHTs, out-patient clinics, mental health wards and other places (e.g. the local centre of MIND).

Admitted patients were not invited.

Reminder - after a month.

Page 8: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

AnalysisQuantitative data – descriptive statistics.

Qualitative data – framework analysis.

Carers: too few to be included in the analysis.

Page 9: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Results

Page 10: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Quantitative: Service providers170/330 responded - response rate about

50%.

56 participants left after introductory questions.

72% participants having > 6 years experience in mental health.

Page 11: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

GPs

CPNs

Psych

iatr

ists SW

staff

nur

ses

Suppo

rt w

orke

rs

Man

ager

sOT

Psych

olog

ists

Oth

ers

3734

30

23

12

7 73 2

15

Distribution of respondents

Page 12: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Distribution of Respondents

CMHT; 63

Primary care; 37

In-patient; 35

CRHT; 19

AOT; 10 Liaison; 2 Addiction; 2 Others; 2

Page 13: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Results: contd...

Yes; 134

No; 36

Awareness

Yes; 47

No; 49

Need

No; 30

Yes; 66

Would it stay?

No; 88

Yes; 8

Subspecialty?

Page 14: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Satisfaction of service providers

Page 15: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Quantitative: Service users

20/43 respondents had a history of admission.

Duration of contact with mental health: 2-10 years.

Awareness: 16/43 (36%) aware

Page 16: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Satisfaction of service users

Page 17: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation
Page 18: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Qualitative resultsNeed of functional model:

Unaware; divided opinions.to save money and/or time to reduce workload on consultantsto improve patient care.Service need, no clinical need.

Long-term future:driven by financial issues, so will stay (2/3)would be reversed (1/3)

Page 19: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Qualitative resultsAdvantages

1/3 : no advantages of this changeDisadvantagesIn-patient psychiatry – NOT a separate sub-

specialty.Skills Training

Page 20: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Qualitative data

CONTINUITY/COMMUNICATION•Both consultants attend CPA•Care-coordinators•Shared electronic records

Functional Model:

Mind the Gap

DYNAMICS•Disagreements•ResponsibilitySuggestions:•Communication•Shared decisions PATIENT CARE

•Easily available consultant.•Time/cost efficient.•↓ trust.•Problems with discharge.Suggestion: Communication

SU’s SATISFACTION•Poor engagement•Repetition•2nd opinionSuggestion: Involve SU & C in service designing.

STRESS, SKILLS & TRAINING

•Less stress, more time.•De-skilling Vs specialisation,•Poor training.Suggestion: Rotation

Page 21: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

In their own words...Assessment tools & referral notes - not a

substitute for first hand knowledge of a patient and their circumstances.

......... a GP.

Smooth running of wards.Likely to improve in-patient and community care

individually but discontinuity will offset advantage.

.......... Mental health professionals.

The old system was on paper and we were seeing a different consultant every 3 months anyway.

.......... A service user

Page 22: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

DiscussionAwareness.Driving force for NWW.It would continue despite a high level of

dissatisfaction.The most consistent view - continuity of care,

the therapeutic alliance, the doctor-patient relationship and trust

Ensuring continuity of care was already a challenge

Page 23: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Evidence basePioneering work at Guy’s hospital.East Suffolk (pilot in 2005).

A survey of psychiatrists (Dale & Milner, 2009) : Generally negative attitudes, particularly effect on patient care, the erosion of the professional role of the consultant and quality of work life.

Malik et al (2008) : the implications on training.

Page 24: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

StrengthsExplorative studyMulticentre Both service providers (primary and

secondary care, medical and non-medical) as well as service users included

Highly relevant and Topical.Solution focussed.

Page 25: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

LimitationsSample size and response rate.

Response bias.

Many participants did not experience this model.

Admitted service users were not included.

Page 26: Functional Model : Mind the Gap - Prize Presentation

Future directionsTo study that ‘actual’ long term impact of

functional model on these issues.

Thanks