ftrht) - utah...2014/12/18 · i0,2014 hearing in opposition to crescent point's request in...

BEFORE THE BOARD OF OIL, GAS AND MINING

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

STATE OF UTAH

FtrHt)ÐEC I I 20ltr

SECRETARY, BOAFD OFOIL, GAS & MINING

IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUESTFOR AGENCY ACTION OFCRESCENT POINT ENERGY U.S.CORP. TO EXPAND THE ULTWATERFLOOD PROJECT LOCATEDIN SECTTON 36, TOWI\SHIP 3 SOUTH,RANGE I EAST, U.S.M., UTNTAHCOUNTY, UTAH, TO INCLUDEADJACENT SECTIONS 34 AND 35,TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 1. EAST,FOR APPROVAL OF ENHANCED ANDSECONDARY RECOVERYOPERATIONS IN THE GREEN RIVERAND WASATCH FORMATIONS INSAID SECTIONS 34 AND 35, FORAUTHORITY FOR UNDERGROUNDINJECTION OF \ryATER, ANDCERTIFICATION AS AN ENHANCEDRECOVERY PROJECT

[FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LA\il,

AND ORDER

EXPANDED ULTWATERFLOOD

PROJECT

Docket No. 2014-036Cause No. 131-139

)))))))))))))))))))

This Cause came on regularly for hearing before the Utah Board of Oil, Gas and

Mining (the "Board") on Vy'ednesday, December 10,2014, at the hour of 9:00 a.m. in the

Auditorium of the Department of Natural Resources, 1594 West North Temple, Salt Lake City,

Utah. The following Board members were present at the December 10, 2014heaÅng: Ruland J.

Gill, Jr., Chairman; Kelly L. Payne; Carl F. Kendell; Chris D. Hansen; Michael R. Brown; Susan S

Davis; and Gordon L. Moon. John Roberts, Associate Director-Oil and Gas; Brad Hill, Oil and

Gas Permitting Manager; Dustin Doucet, Petroleum Engineer; and Clinton Dworshak, Compliance

and Public Outreach Manager, were present for the Division of Oil, Gas and Mining (the

"Division"). The Board was represented by Mike S. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, and the

juliecarter

Typewritten Text

[PROPOSED]

Division was represented by Steven F. Alder, Assistant Attorney General. The petitioner, Crescent

Point Energy U.S. Corp. ("Crescent Point") was represented by Thomas W. Clawson of Van Cott,

Bagley, Cornwall & McCarthy; and Ryan'Waller, Crescent Point's Landman; LavtaRoberts,

Crescent Point's Geologist; and Katie Matthews, Crescent Point's Development Engineer, testified

on behalf of the petitioner. The Board recognized Ms. Roberts as an expert geologist and Ms.

Matthews as an expert petroleum engineer for the purposes of this Cause.

The Division expressed its support for granting Crescent Point's Request for Agency

Action filed in this Cause (the "Request") at the hearing. No other person or party filed a response

to the Request and no other person or party appeared at or participated in the hearing.

The Board, having fully considered the testimony adduced and exhibits received into

evidence at the December 10, 2}I4hearing, being fully advised, and good cause appearing, hereby

makes the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order in this Cause:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Notices of the time, place, and purposes of the Board's regularly scheduled

December 10,2014 hearing were mailed to all interested parties by first-class mail, postage prepaid,

and were duly published in the Salt Lake Tribune, Deseret Morning News, Uintah Basin Standard,

and Vemal Express pursuant to the requirements of Rule R641-106-100, Utah Administrative Code

("U.4.C."). Copies of Crescent Point's Request were mailed to all interested parties pursuant to

Rule R641 - 1 04-1 35, U.A.C.

2. No written responses, protests, or objections to Crescent Point's Request

were filed with or received by the Division or the Board, and no persons or parties appeared at, or

participated in, the December I0,2014 hearing in opposition to Crescent Point's Request in this

2

matter

3, Crescent Point Energy U.S. Corp. is a Delaware corporation in good

standing, having its principal place of business in Denver, Colorado. Crescent Point is qualified to

and is doing business in Utah.

4. Under that certain Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order issued

by the Board on April 8,2014, and entered in Cause No. 131-137 (the "Prior ULT Order"), the

Board approved (and certified for the purposes of a severance tax rate reduction) the ULT

V/aterflood Project as an enhanced and secondary recovery project located in subject Section 36,

Township 3 South, Range I East, U.S.M., including the underground injection of water and a plan

of development and operations in the Unitized Formation (as defined herein) utilizing a 4}-acte

five-spot injection pattem and a well grid utilizing2}-acre spacing.

5. The proposed expanded ULT V/aterflood Project (the "Expanded ULT

V/aterflood Project") embraces the following described lands in the Leland Bench Field, Uintah

County, Utah (the "Subject Lands"):

Township 3 South. Range I East. U.S.M.

Section 34: AllSection 35: AllSection 36: All

(containing 1,923,72 acres, more or less).

6. The formations to be approved by the Board for enhanced and secondary

recovery in the Expanded ULT Waterflood Project are the Green River and Vy'asatch formations,

more particularly defined as follows (the "Unitized Formation"):

The Green River and'Wasatch formations as identified by the logs run onthe crescent Point ULT #12-36-3-lE Well located in the NV/%SW% ofSection 36, Township 3 South, Range I East, U.S'M., Uintah County'utah, with the top of the stratigraphic interval being found at a depth of5]25 feet below the surface (-637'subsea) and the base of the interval

âJ

being found at a depth of 7 ,900 feet below the surface (-2,800' subsea) orstratigraphic equivalent thereof.

7, The majority of the minerals in the lands embraced within the Expanded

ULT Waterflood Project are owned in fee by the Utah Land Trust ("ULT") and the remaining

minerals are also owned in fee by other private parties. All of the minerals embraced within the

Expanded ULT Waterflood Project are subject to fee (private) oil and gas leases. There are no

overriding royalty interest owners.

8. Crescent Point owns 100% of the working interest in the Expanded ULT

V/aterflood Project area.

9. The surface of the Subject Lands embraced within the Expanded ULT

'Waterflood Project Area is owned in fee, by private parties.

10. Drilling on the Subject Lands has proceeded under either the Prior ULT

Order, two spacing orders previously entered by the Board (as described herein), or statewide

location and density patterns for the location and siting of wells established by Rule R649-3-2,

U.A.C. Under that certain Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order entered on September

26,2007, in Cause No. 142-03, the Board established twelve 80-acre laydown (horizontal) drilling

units comprising all of subject Section 36 and the N% of subject Section 35 for the production of oil

and associated gas and other hydrocarbons from the Lower Green River formation as described in

that order. Under that certain Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Allowing In-fill

Wells entered on August 24,2011, in Cause No. 142-05, the Board modified its previous spacing

order to permit the drilling of an additional (second) well for the production of oil and associated

gas and other hydrocarbons for the Lower Green River formation beneath the spacing/drilling units

encompassing the N% of Section 35 and all of Section 36. (The orders in Causes Nos. 142-03 and

142-05 are collectively referred to herein as the "Prior Spacing Orders".) The Prior ULT Order

4

vacated the Prior Spacing Orders to the extent they affect subject Section 36. The Prior Spacing

Orders do not allow development of the Subject Lands and minerals in the N% of subject Section 35

on the basis of a well grid utilizing 20-aue spacing as requested by Crescent Point.

1 I . The wells that have been proposed and/or drilled andlor completed in the

acreage embraced within the Expanded ULT 'Waterflood Project area are listed in Attachment "4,"

which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. Attachment "A" also lists the wells located within

one-half mile of the boundary of the Expanded ULT Waterflood Projectarea.

12. Most of the wells described above have produced (or are expected to

produce) oil and gas from the Green River and Wasatch formations.

13. The reservoir underlying the Expanded ULT V/aterflood Project area is a

solution-gas drive reservoir that is normally pressured. As is characteristic of such reservoirs, there

is a relatively rapid loss of reservoir energy as primary production occurs, resulting in a rapid

decline in production and low primary recovery.

14. As ofNovember 1, 20I4,the estimated remaining gross proved developed

producing reseryes for the producing and proposed wells drilled under the Prior Spacing Orders or

on the basis of 4O-acre equivalent spacing within subject Sections 34 and 35 are approximately

2.5498 million barrels of oil and I,274.9 MMCF of gas. If enhanced recovery operations based on a

4}-acre 5-spot injection pattern and a well grid utilizing2}-acre well spacing as outlined in

petitioner's Request and as presented at the December 10, 2014hearing are implemented in subject

Sections 34 and 35, the gross proved developed producing reseryes are estimated to be

approximately 4.3254 million barrels of oil and 2,162.1MMCF of gas.

15. A water flood enhanced and secondary recovery project in the Green River

and'Wasatch formations in Sections 34 and 35 based ona4}-acre 5-spot injection pattern and a well

5

grid utilizing2}-acre well spacing could increase ultimate recovery by approximately 1.7756

million barrels of oil and 900 MMCF of gas. The net present value of these reseryes is estimated to

be approximately 524,000,000 (before taxes) after accounting for the additional costs associated

with implementing the enhanced and secondary recovery operations. The value of the estimated

additional recovery of oil and gas substantially exceeds the estimated additional cost incident to

conducting enhanced and secondary recovery operations.

16, Crescent Point is the operator of the original ULT Waterflood Project, the

nearby Randlett Waterflood Project, and other water flood projects located in Canada. Crescent

Point is experienced in the operation of water flood projects.

17. Applications for approval of injection wells within the Expanded ULT

V/aterflood Project area as Class II injection wells will be submitted to the Division to be approved

on an administrative basis.

18. Under the proposed enhanced and secondary recovery plan, the average

injection rate will be approximately 200-300 banels of water per day per injection well. The

maximum pressure will vary by well, but will be less than parting pressure as determined by step-

rate tests.

19, The water to be used as the injection medium for the water flood project will

come from producing wells, which will be treated as necessary to render it compatible with the

formation water, and will be transported by truck andlor pipeline to the Expanded ULT Waterflood

Project.

20. Except for the plan of development and operations (and o\,ryners agreement

thereof) for the original ULT Waterflood Project in subject Section 36 as approved by the Board in

the Prior ULT Order, no voluntary agreement as contemplated by Section 40-6-7(l) of the Utah

6

Code and no plan of development and operation of the pool as contemplated by Section 40-6-7(2) of

the Utah Code exist with respect to the Expanded ULT Waterflood Project Area.

2L One hundred percent of all owners of working interests and in excess of 98

percent of all owners of royalty interests within the proposed expanded proj ect area are agreeable to

the plan of development and enhanced and secondary recovery operations as provided in

petitioner's Request, hearing testimony, and Exhibit Binder, as supplemented, all as introduced,

adduced, and admitted as evidence at the December 10,2014 hearing, and such owners have

expressed in writing their approval of said plan of operations and development.

22. Crescent Point will be the designated operator.

23. The allocation of production for the Expanded ULT Waterflood Project will

be made in accordance with the terms of the Subject Leases and that certain Proceeds Allocation

Agreement as introduced and admitted at the December 10, 2014hearing as the Second Supplement

to Exhibit B, and such allocation is reasonable and acceptable to the Board and the Division.

24. The geology and engineering data for the Expanded ULT V/aterflood

Project, including the materials contained in the Exhibit Binder, as supplemented, all as introduced,

adduced, and admitted at the December I0,2014 hearing, are reasonable and acceptable to the

Board and the Division.

25, The plan of development and operations and the geology and engineering

data for the Expanded ULT Waterflood Project operations, all as introduced, adduced, and admitted

at the December I0,2014 hearing, are reasonable and will satisff the requirements of the Utah

Code, and will accomplish the goals of the enhanced and secondary recovery project.

7

26. The proposed cooperative development and enhanced and secondary

recovery operations in the Expanded ULT V/aterflood Project arca ate necessary to fulfill the

purposes of Chapter 6 of Title 40 of the Utah Code.

27. The proposed water-injection operations based on a 40-acre five-spot

injection pattem using a well grid utilizing 2}-acre spacing will satisff the purposes of the well

location and siting rules (RulesR649-3-2 and R649-3-3, U.A.C.) with respect to the proposed

operations.

28, Petitioner Crescent Point and the Division's attomey and staff were the only

persons or parties who attended or participated in the December 10, 2014heanng.

29. Section 59-5-102(7) of the Utah Code provides that a 50o/o reduction in the

severance tax rate is imposed upon the incremental production achieved from an enhanced recovery

proj ect. Section 59-5- 1 0 I (7) provides, in pertinent part, that:

"Enhanced recovery project" means: (a) the injection of liquids . . .

directly into a reservoir for the purpose of: (i) augmenting reservoirenergy; (ii) modiffing the properties of the fluids or gases in a reservoir;or (iii) changing the reservoir conditions to increase the recoverable oil,gas, or oil and gas through the joint use of two or more well bores; and(b) a project initially approved by the board as a new or expandedenhanced recovery proj ect on or after January I , 1996 .

Section 59-5-1 0 1 (9) provides that:

"Incremental production" means fhatpart of production, certified by theDivision of Oil, Gas and Mining, which is achieved from an enhancedrecovery project that would not have economically occurred under thereservoir conditions existing before the project and that has beenapproved by the division as incremental production.

30. The enhanced and secondary operations for the ULT Waterflood Project

quali$' as operations of an enhanced recovery project for purposes of Section 59-5-102(7) ofthe

8

Utah Code.

31. The Division supports granting Crescent Point's Request'

32. The Board voted unanimously (7-0) to approve Crescent Point's Request.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

L Due and regular notice of the time, place, and purposes of the Board's

regularly scheduled December 10,2014 hearing was given to all interested parties in the form and

manner and within the time required by law and the Rules and Regulations of the Board. Due and

regular notice of the filing of the Request was given to all interested parties in the form and manner

and within the time required by law and the Rules and Regulations of the Board.

2. The Board has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter of Crescent

Point's Request pursuant to Sections 40-6-5,40-6-7,40-6-8, and 59-5-102 of the Utah Code and has

the power and authorþ to make and promulgate the order herein set forth.

3. Crescent Point's proposed cooperative development and enhanced and

secondary recovery operations in the Green River and'Wasatch formations as introduced, adduced,

and admitted as evidence at the December 10,2014 hearing, are in the public interest and will

promote conservation, will increase ultimate recovery, will prevent waste, and will protect

correlative rights.

4. Crescent Point's proposed cooperative development and enhanced and

secondary recovery operations for the Expanded ULT Waterflood Project are reasonably necessary

to fulfill the purposes of Chapter 6 of Title 40 of the Utah Code.

5. The proposed water-injection operations based on a 4O-acre five-spot

injection pattern using a well grid utilizing 2}-acre spacing are reasonable and satis$r the purposes

of the well location and siting rules (RulesR649-3-2 and R649-3-3, U.A.C.) with respect to the

proposed operations.

9

6. The plan of cooperative development and operations, as adduced at the

hearing and as shown in the geology and engineering data contained in the Exhibit Binder, as

supplemented, will accomplish the goals of the Expanded ULT V/aterflood Project.

7. Crescent Point has sustained its burden of proof, demonstrated good cause,

and satisfied all legal requirements for granting the Request.

8. It is necessary andproper under the circumstances to vacate the Prior

Spacing Orders to the extent they affect the Subject Lands in the N% of subject Section 35 to allow

Crescent Point to implement its proposed plan of cooperative development and operations for the

Subject Lands and minerals.

9. Good cause appears to certifr the Expanded ULT Waterflood Project as an

enhanced recovery project for the purposes of Section 59-5-102(7) of the Utah Code.

ORDER

Based upon the Request, the testimony and evidence submitted and entered at the

December 10,2014 hearing, and the findings of fact and conclusions of law as stated above, it is

therefore ordered that:

1. Crescent Point's Request seeking approval of the Expanded ULT

'Waterflood Project is granted.

2. The Green River and Wasatch formations, defined as follows:

The Green River and Wasatch formations as identified by the logs run onthe Crescent Point ULT #12-36-3-lE Well located in the NV/%S'W% ofSection 36, Township 3 South, Range 1 East, U.S.M., Uintah County,rJtah, with the top of the stratigraphic interval being found at a depth of5,725 feet below the surface (-637' subsea) and the base of the intervalbeing found at a depth of 7,900 feet below the surface (-2,800' subsea) orstrati graphic equivalent thereof

10

underlying the lands in Uintah County, Utah, collectively named the Expanded ULT

'Waterflood Project described as follows:

Toumshin J Soufh qnoe I Fasf TT S M

Section 34: AllSection 35: AllSection 36: All

(containing 1,923 .72 acres, more or less)

constitutes a pool for the operation of the Expanded ULT Waterflood Project and the Board

hereby establishes the same as a pool to be operated cooperatively for the continued

operation of all wells thereon. The lands and pool shall be known as the Expanded ULT

V/aterflood Proj ect Area.

3. The cooperative development hereby established shall be known as

the Expanded ULT Waterflood Project.

4. The Green River and V/asatch formations, as defìnedinparagraph2

of this Order, constitute a pool for the operation of a waterflood enhanced and secondary

recovery project, and the Board hereby establishes the same to be operated as a cooperative

pool for enhanced and secondary recovery operations.

5. The plan of development and operations, as introduced and adduced

at the December 10,2014 hearing and as shown in the geology and engineering data

contained in the Exhibit Binder, as supplemented, is hereby approved.

6. Pursuant to Section 40-6-8(4) of the Utah Code, the Proceeds Allocation

Agreement admitted as the Second Supplement to Exhibit B shall be binding upon all owners of

working interest and all owners of lessor's royalty and other leasehold burdens within the Expanded

ULT V/aterflood Project Area as authorized by Utah Code Annotated $$ 40-6-7 and 40-6-8,

l1

because more than 70 percent of those owners have approved in writing the plan for cooperative

development and operations approved and prescribed by the Board and the Division.

7 . The Prior Spacing Orders are hereby vacated to the extent they affect the

Subject Lands.

8. The Expanded ULT Waterflood Project is certif,red as an enhanced recovery

project for purposes of the severance taxrate reduction pursuant to Section 59-5-102(7) of the Utah

Code.

9. The 4O-acre five-spot injection pattern using a well grid utilizing 2}-acre

spacing as approved by this Order satisfies the purposes of the general well location and siting rules,

Rules Pt649-3-2 and R649-3-3, U.A.C., affecting the Subject Lands and formations, and such rules

are suspended to the extent they are inconsistent with the operations approved by this Order.

Subject to Paragraph 11 of this Order and a showing that a well location will protect correlative

rights and prevent waste, the Division is authorizedto approve well locations within the Expanded

ULT V/aterflood Project Area where such locations promote conservation and increase the ultimate

recovery of oil or gas; provided however, no future well shall be located closer than 460 feet from

the boundary of the Expanded ULT Waterflood Project Area without administrative approval of the

Division in accordance with the well exception location requirements of Rule R649-3-3, U.A.C. In

the event that the project area is contracted or terminated, the land not remaining within the project

area shall be once again subject to well location requirements.

10. The underground injection program proposed by Crescent Point in

connection with the enhanced and secondary recovery project is hereby approved.

I 1. This Order does not waive jurisdiction of the Board over the Underground

Injection Control (UIC) program with respect to the injection wells contemplated for the Expanded

t2

ULT V/aterflood Project Area, and expressly directs Crescent Point to comply with all requirements

and procedures of the UIC program administered by the Division.

12. Pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R641 and Utah Code Arm. $ 63-46b-6

to -10 (1953, as amended), the Board has considered and decided this matter as a formal

adjudication.

13. This Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law and Order ("Order") is based

exclusively on evidence of record in the adjudicative proceeding or on facts offrcially noted, and

constitutes the signed written order stating the Board's decision and the reasons for the decision, all

as required by the Utah Administrative Procedures Act, Utah Code Ann. $ 63-46b-10 and Utah

Administrative Code R64 1 - I 09.

14.

Request Board Reconsideration: As required by Utah Code Ann. $ 63-46b-10(e) to -10(g) (1953, as

amended), the Board hereby notifies all parties in interest that they have the right to seek judicial

review of this hnal Board Order in this formal adjudication by filing a timely appeal with the Utah

Supreme Court within 30 days after the date that this Order is issued. Utah Code Arìn.

$ 63-46b-14(3Xa) and -16 (1953, as amended). As an alternative to seeking immediate judicial

review, and not as a prerequisite to seeking judicial review, the Board also hereby notifies parties

that they may elect to request that the Board reconsider this Order, which constitutes afnal agency

action of the Board, Utah Code Ann. $ 63-46b-13, entitled, "Agency review - Reconsideration,"

states:

(lXa) Within 20 days after the date that an order is issued for whichreview by the agency or by a superior agency under Section63-46b-12 is unavailable, and if the order would otherwise constitutefinal agency action, any party may file a written request forreconsideration with the agency, stating the specif,rc grounds uponwhich relief is requested.

13

(b) Unless otherwise provided by statute, the filing of the request isnot a prerequisite for seekingjudicial review ofthe order.(2) The request for reconsideration shall be filed with the agency andone copy shall be sent by mail to each party by the person makingthe request.(3)(a) The agency head, or a person designated for that pu{pose,shall issue a written order granting the request or denying the request.(b) Ifthe agency head or the person designated for that purpose doesnot issue an order within 20 days after the filing of the request, therequest for reconsideration shall be considered to be denied.

Id. The Board also hereby notifies the parties that Utah Administrative Code R641-110-100, which

is part of a group of Board rules entitled, "Rehearing and Modification of Existing Orders," states

Any person affected by a final order or decision of the Board mayfile a petition for rehearing. Unless otherwise provided, a petition forrehearing must be hled no later than the 10th day of the monthfollowing the date of signing of the final order or decision for whichthe rehearing is sought. A copy of such petition will be served oneach other parly to th. pro...ding no later than the 15h day ofthatmonth.

Id, See Utah Administrative Code R641-110-200 for the required contents of a petition for

rehearing, If there is any conflict between the deadline in Utah Code Ann $ 63-46b-13 (1953, as

amended) and the deadline in Utah Administrative Code R641-110-100 for moving to rehear this

matter, the Board hereby rules that the later of the two deadlines shall be available to any party

moving to rehear this matter. If the Board later denies a timely petition for rehearing, the parly may

still seek judicial review of the Order by perfecting a timely appeal with the Utah Supreme Court

within 30 days thereafter.

15. The Board retains continuing jurisdiction over all the parties and over the

subject matter of this Cause, except to the extent said jurisdiction may be divested by the filing of a

timely appeal to seek judicial review of this Order by the Utah Supreme Court.

16, For all pulposes, the Chairman's signature on a faxed copy of this Order

shall be deemed the equivalent of a signed original.

t4

ISSUED this day of December,20l4

STATE OF UTAHBOARD OF OIL, GAS AND MINING

Ruland J. Gill, Jr., Chairman

15

ATTACHMENT Tú4"

LIST OF WELLS PROPOSED ANDiOR DRILLED AND/OR COMPLETED V/ITHIN THEEXPANDED ULT WATERFLOOD PROJECT AND WITHIN A ONE-HALF MILE RADIUSOF THE PROJECT AREA

4834-6477-5969,v, I

T6

Exhibit B-LDocket No. 201-4-036Cause No. 131--1-39

(¡,

API Well Number

43-047-57577-OO-OO

43-047-51579-00-00

43-047-51580-00-00

43-047-5175].-00-00

43-047-51895-00-00

43-047-51897-00-00

43-047-51898-00-00

43-047-51900-00-00

43-047-5190L-00-00

43-047-51902-00-00

43-047-51931-00-00

43-047-51933-00-00

43-047-52042-00-00

43-047-52043-00-00

43-047-52044-00-00

43-047-52293-00-00

43-047-54261-00-00

43-047-54262-00-00

43-047-54263-00-00

43-047-54278-00-00

43-047-54264-00-00

43-047-54265-00-00

43-047-54266-00-00

43-047-54267-00-00

43-047-54268-00-00

Operator

CRESCENT POINT ENERGY U.S. CORP




CRESCENT POINÏ ENERGY U.S. CORP




CRESCENT POINT ENERGY U.S, CORP









CRESCENT POINT ENERGY U,S. CORP




CRESCENT POINT ENERGY U.5. CORP




lnside Project Area; Section 36, T3S-R1E

Well Name Well Status

ULT 5-36-3-1E Producing




ULT4-36-3-1E Producing





ULT L5-36-3-1E Producing

ULT 8-36-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT 11-36-3-LE Producing




ULTTX-36-3-1E Producing

ULï E-36-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT F-36-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT G-36-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULTJ-36-3-LE Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT K-36-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT L-36-3-1E Producing

ULT M-36-3-1E Producing

ULT N-36-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT O-36-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

County

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINÏAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

Qtr/Qtr

SWNW

SESW

SESE

NENE

NWNW

SENW

NWNE

NESE

swsw

SWSE

SENE

NESW

NENW

NWSE

NWSW

SWNE

NENW

NENW

NWNE

SWNE

SENW

SWNW

SESW

NESW

NWSE

Section

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

35

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

36

Crescent Point

Township-Range)

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1-E

3S-1E

35-1E

3S-1E

35-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

35-1E

35-1E

35-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1-E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

Exh¡bit B-2Docket No. 2014-036Cause No. 131--1-39

(pCrescent Point

API Well Number

43-047-5L893-00-00

43-047-51660-00-00

43-047-51657-00-00

43-047-51658-00-00

43-047-51754-00-00

43-047-51894-00-00

43-047-51896-00-00

43-047-51899-00-00

43-047-51927-00-00

43-047-51935-00-00

43-047-52045-00-00

43-047-52048-00-00

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD.

ÏBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Section

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

Township-Range)

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

35-1E

35-1E

35-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

35-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

Operator


CRESCENÏ POINT ENERGY U.S. CORP



























lnside ProjectArea Continued; Section 35, T3S-R1E


ULT 2-35-3-1E Producrng

ULTT-35-3-1E Producrng

ULT5-35-3-18 Producing

MARSH 14-35-3-1E Producing

MARSH 13-35-3-1E Producing

ULT3-35-3-1E Producrng

MARSH 11-35-3-1E Producrng


MARSH 12-35-3-1E Producrng




CAMERON ADKINS 9-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

PAN OKLAHOMA 10-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

ST. ONE 15-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

UTOCO 16-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

ULT E-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

ULT F-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

ULT G-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

ULT H-35-3-1E Perm¡t Not Submitted

ULT l-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

ULTJ-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

ULT K-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

ULT L-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

MARSH M-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

ULT N-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

STONE O-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

ULT P-35-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

CounÇ

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

U¡NTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINÏAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

Qtr/QtrNWNE

SWNE

SWNW

SESW

SWSW

NENW

NESW

NWNW

NWSW

NENE

SENE

SENW

NESE

NWSE

SWSE

SESE

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

ÏBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Exhibit B-3Docket No. 2014-036Cause No. L31--1-39

(p

API Well Number

43-047-5L654-00-00

43-047-51655-00-00

43-047-51655-00-00

43-047-51756-00-00

43-047-52123-00-00

43-047-52\24-OO-OO

43-047-5212s-00-00

43-047-52458-00-00

43-047-52459-00-00

43-047-52460-00-00

43-047-52461-00-00

43-047-52462-00-00

43-047-52463-00-00

43-047-52464-00-00

43-047-52465-00-00

43-047-52466-00-00

TBD

TBD

43-047-54495-00-00

43-047-54497-00-00

43-047-54498-00-00

43-047-54500-00-00

43-047-s4501-00-00

TBD

43-047-54502-00-00

43-047-54503-00-00

43-047-54504-00-00

43-047-54505-00-00

Operator













CRESCENT POINI ENERGY U.S. CORP
















lnside ProjectArea Continued; Section 34, T3S-RlE



ULTT-34-3-1E Producing














ULï 15-34-3-1E Producing

ULT H-34-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

ULT l-34-3-1E Perm¡t Not Submitted

ULT J-34-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT G-34-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT F-34-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT E-34-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT O-34-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT P-34-3-1E Permit Not Submitted

ULT N-34-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT M-34-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT L-34-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT K-34-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

County

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

Qtr/QtrSWNW

SWNE

SESE

NENE

NWSW

NENW

NWSE

NWNE

NWNW

SENW

SENE

NESE

NESW

swswSESW

SWSE

TBD

TBD

NESE

NWNE

NENW

NENW

NESE

TBD

NWSE

NESW

SWNW

NWSE

Section

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

Crescent Point

Township-Range)

3S-1E

3S-1E

35-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-LE

35-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

35-1E

3S-1E

Exhibit B-4Docket No. 2014-036Cause No. 1-31--1-39

(p

API Well Number

43-047-51652-00-00

43-047-51755-00-00

43-047-51875-00-00

43-047-51888-00-00

43-047-52047-00-00

43-047-51891-00-00

43-047-51887-00-00

43-047-51653-00-00

43-047-51583-00-00

43-047-51584-00-00

43-047-51889-00-00

43-047-51890-00-00

43-047-51892-00-00

43-047-51929-00-00

43-047-52034-00-00

43-047-52039-00-00

43-047-38501-00-00

43-047-40040-00-00

43-047-52971-OO-00

43-047-52988-00-00

43-047-s1576-00-00

43-047-51585-00-00

43-047-51661-00-00

43-047-52957-OO-OO

43-047-40017-00-00

43-047-52954-00-00

43-047-52956-00-00

43-047-52958-00-00

43-047-52427-00-00

Operator

























CRESCENÏ POINÏ ENERGY U.S. CORP





Outside ProjectArea (1/2 Mile Radius)


ULT 16-26-3-LE Producrng





ULT 72-26-3-IE Producing



DEEP CREEK I6-25-3-tE Producing


DEEP CREEK 11-25-3-1E Producrng


DEEP CREEK 15-25-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

DEEP CREEK 9-25-3-1E Approved permìt (APD); not yet spudded

DEEP CREEK 10-25-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

SENATORE t2-25-3-18 Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

KNIGHT 14-30 Producrng

ELIASON 1-2-30 Producrng

DEEP CREEK 11-30-3-2E Approved permit (APD); notyetspuddedKNIGHT 13-30-3-2E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT 14-31--3-2E Producrng




ULT 4-31 Water Disposal Well


ULT 5-31--3-2E Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

ULT 13-31-3-2E Approved permit (APD); not yet spùdded

BOWERS 3-6-4-28 Producing

County

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINÏAH

UINTAH

UINÏAI{

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

Qtr/QtrSESE

NESE

NWSE

SWSE

NESW

NWSW

SWSW

SESW

SESE

SESW

NESW

SWSW

SWSE

NESE

NWSE

NWSW

SESW

NWSW

NESW

SWSW

SESW

NWSW

SENW

NESW

NWNW

NENW

SWNW

SWSW

NENW

Section

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

30

30

30

30

31

31

31

31

31

31

31

31

6

Crescent Point

Township-Range)

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-r.E

35-1E

3S-1E

3S-2E

35-2E

3S-2E

3S-2E

3S-2E

3S-2E

3S-2E

3S-2E

3S-2E

35-2E

3S-2E

3S-2E

45-28

Exh¡b¡t B-5Docket No. 2014-036Cause No. 131-1-39

(p

API Well Number43-047-s2427-00-0043-047-52432-00-0043-047-52428-00-0043-047-52r-16-00-0043-047-5211-8-00-0043-047-521-19-00-0043-047-52720-00-0043-047-52122-00-0043-047-52457-00-0043-047-54465-00-0043-047-54/66-00-0043-047-52726-00-0043-047-52127-OO-0043-047-52728-00-0043-047-52r.30-00-0043-047-54036-00-0043-047-54037-00-0043-047-54040-00-0043-047-54041-00-0043-047-54042-00-0043-047-54046-00-0043-047-54054-00-0043-047-54052-00-0043-047-52442-00-0043-047-s2441,-00-0043-047-51288-00-0043-047-51-303-00-0043-047-5201,4-00-0043-047-5201-5-00-00

43-047-525L5-00-0043-047-53704-00-0043-047-51307-00-0043-047-s1308-00-0043-047-53705-00-0043-047-51750-00-0043-047-s3706-00-0043-047-53707-OO-O0

OperatorCRESCENT POINT ENERGY U.S. CORP























NEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANYNEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANYNEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANYNEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANYNEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANYNEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANYNEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANYNEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANYNEWFIELD PRODUCIION COMPANYNEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANYNEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANYNEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANYNEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANY

NEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANY

Outs¡de Project Area (1/2 Mile Radius) Cont¡nuedWell Name Well StatusBOWERS 5-6-4-2E ProducingBOWERS 4-6-4-2E ProducingBOWERS 6-6-4-28 Spudded (Drilling commenced: Not yet completed)SZYNDROWSKI t2-27-3-78 ProducingUTE ENERGY 70-27-3-tE ProducingUTE ENERGY t7-27-3-78 ProducingUTE ENERGY t5-27-3-IE ProducingUTE ENERGY t4-27-3-LE ProducingSZYNDROWSKI 13-27-3-tE ProducingRiley 16-27-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedRiley 9-27-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedSZYNDROWSKIl6-28-3-1E ProducingSZYNDROWSKIl5-28-3-1E ProducingSZYNDROWSKI 9-28-3-1E ProducingSZYNDROWSKI10-28-3-1E ProducingColeman Tribal 1-33-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedColeman Tribal 2-33-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedColeman Tribal 7-33-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedColeman Iribal 8-33-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedColeman Tribal 9-33-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedColeman Tribal 10-33-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedColeman Tribal 15-33-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedColeman Tribal 16-33-3-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedUIETRIBAL3-1-4-1E ProducingUTE TRIBAL t-14-1.E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedUTETRIBAL5-2-4-1E ProducingUTETRIBALT-2-4-1E ProducingUTETRIBAL3-2-4-1E ProducingUTE TRI BAL 6-2-4-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedUTE TRIBAL i-2-4-18 Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedUte Tribal 4-2-4-78 Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedUTETRIBAL 5-3-4-1E ProducingUTETRIBALT-3-4-1E ProducingUte Tribal 3-3-4-1E Approved permit (APD); not yet spuddedUTETRIBAL 7-4-4-tE ProducingUte Tribal 1-4-4-78 Approved perm¡t (APD); not yet spuddedUte Tribal 3-4-4-tE Approved permit (APD); not yet spudded

CountyUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINÏAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAH

UINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAHUINTAH

UINTAH

U¡NTAHUINTAH

UINÏAHUINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

UINTAH

Qtr/q1tSWNWNWNWSENW

NWSWNWSE

NESW

SWSE

SESW

SWSWSESE

NESE

SESE

SWSE

NESE

NWSE

NENE

NWNESWNESENE

NESE

NWSE

SWSE

SESE

NENW

NENE

SWNWSWNE

NENWSENW

NENE

NWNWSWNWSWNE

NENW

SWNE

NENE

NENW

Section6

6

6

27272727272727272828282833333333333333

331

t2222

2

2

3

3

3

444

Crescent Point

Township-Range)4S-2E

4S-2E

4S-2E

3S-1E

3S-183S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-LE

3S-t E

3S-1E

35-1E35-1E3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

3S-1E

35-1E

3S-1E

45-1E

45-1E45-1E45-1E4S-1E

45-1E4S-1E

45-1E

4S-1E

4S.1E

45-1E45-1E

4S-1E

4S-1E

ftrht) - utah...2014/12/18 · i0,2014 hearing in opposition to crescent point's request in...

Documents