from: spawforths on behalf of fisure homes sent: 30 september …€¦ · 2.5. this document...
TRANSCRIPT
From: Spawforths on behalf of Fisure Homes Sent: 30 September 2019 16:44 To: Local Plan Subject: Doncaster local plan representations Importance: High
Please find attached representations to the Doncaster Local Plan on behalf of Firsure Homes, in
respect of their interests in Doncaster.
The representation covers the following matters:
General Comments
Policy 2 – Spatial strategy and settlement hierarchy
Policy 3 – Level and distribution of growth
Policy 6 – Housing Allocations – Sites 302 and 305: Stripe Road, Rossington
Policy 8 – Delivering the necessary range of housing
Policy 19 – Development affecting public rights of way
Policy 20 – Access, design and layout of public rights of way
Policy 29 – Open space provision in new developments
Policy 46 – Housing design standards
Policy 66 – Developer contributions
Policy 67 – Development viability
We trust that you will confirm that these representations are duly made.
We welcome the opportunity for further engagement and to continue the dialogue with the
Council in respect of these issues as the Local Plan progresses.
Please do not hesitate to contact us to discuss any issues raised in this representation further.
HANNAH LANGLER
Principal: Chartered Town Planner
BSc (Hons), Dip CRP, MRTPI
Junction 41 Business Court, East Ardsley, Leeds, WF3 2AB
Development Plan Representation
Doncaster Local Plan: 2015-
2035: Publication Version (June
2019) On behalf of Firsure Ltd (Stripe Road, Rossington)
September 2019
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
2
1. Introduction 1.1. Spawforths have been instructed by Firsure Ltd to submit representations to the Doncaster
Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version and for their site at Stripe Road, Rossington.
1.2. Appended to these representations is a report assessing the housing requirement, prepared
by Regeneris Consulting.
1.3. Firsure welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the emerging Local Plan for Doncaster
and is keen to further the role of Doncaster within the Sheffield City Region, South Yorkshire
and the Yorkshire and Humber Region as a whole.
1.4. Firsure has significant land interests in the area, which can positively contribute towards the
economic and housing growth agenda.
1.5. Firsure would like to make comments on the following topics and sections in the Doncaster
Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Draft:
• General Comments
• Policy 2 – Spatial strategy and settlement hierarchy
• Policy 3 – Level and distribution of growth
• Policy 6 – Housing Allocations
o Sites 302 and 305: Stripe Road, Rossington
• Policy 8 – Delivering the necessary range of housing
• Policy 19 – Development affecting public rights of way
• Policy 20 – Access, design and layout of public rights of way
• Policy 29 – Open space provision in new developments
• Policy 46 – Housing design standards
• Policy 66 – Developer contributions
• Policy 67 – Development viability
1.6. In each case, observations are set out with reference to the provisions of the Framework and
where necessary, amendments are suggested to ensure that the Local Plan is found sound.
1.7. Firsure welcomes the opportunity for further engagement and the opportunity to appear at
the Examination in Public.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
3
1.8. We trust that you will confirm that these representations are duly made and will give due
consideration to these comments.
1.9. Please do not hesitate to contact us to discuss any issues raised in this Representation further.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
4
2. National Planning Policy Context and Tests of Soundness
2.1. The Government's core objectives as established through the 2018 National Planning Policy
Framework (the 2019 Framework) are sustainable development and growth. Paragraph 11 of
the Framework stresses the need for Local Plans to meet the objectively assessed needs of an
area. The 2019 Framework sets out to boost significantly the supply of homes and that a
sufficient amount and variety of land can come forward where it is needed. In terms of building
a strong and competitive economy the 2019 Framework states that planning should help
create the conditions in which businesses can invest, expand and adapt. The key focus
throughout the 2019 Framework is to create the conditions for sustainable economic growth
and deliver a wide choice of high quality homes.
2.2. In relation to Local Plan formulation, paragraphs 15 to 37 of the Framework states that Local
Plans are the key to delivering sustainable development which reflects the vision and
aspirations of the local community. The Framework indicates that Local Plans must be
consistent with the Framework and should set out the opportunities for development and
provide clear policies on what will and will not be permitted and where.
2.3. In relation to the examination of Local Plans, paragraph 35 of the Framework sets out the
tests of soundness and establishes that:
2.4. The Local Plan and spatial development strategies are examined to assess whether they have
been prepared in accordance with legal and procedural requirements, and whether they are
sounds. Plans are ‘sound’ if they are:
Positively prepared – providing a strategy which, as a minimum, seeks to meet the area’s
objectively assessed needs; and is informed by agreements with other authorities, so that
unmet need from neighbouring areas is accommodated where it is practical to do so and is
consistent with achieving sustainable development
Justified – an appropriate strategy, taking into account the reasonable alternatives, and
based on proportionate evidence;
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
5
Effective – deliverable over the plan period, and based on effective joint working on cross-
boundary strategic matters that have been dealt with rather than deferred, as evidenced by
the statement of common ground; and
Consistent with national policy – enabling the delivery of sustainable development in
accordance with the policies in the Framework.
2.5. This document therefore considers the content of the Doncaster Local Plan – Publication
Version (2015-2035) on behalf of Firsure in light of this planning policy context.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
6
3. General Comments 3.1. Firsure is concerned that the Doncaster Local Plan – Publication Plan is deficient in its
content and the evidence base does not reflect national guidance.
Test of Soundness
3.2. Firsure considers that the Doncaster Local Plan – Publication Version 2015-2035 is unsound.
Which test of soundness are comments about?
X Positively Prepared X Effective
X Justified X Consistency with National Policy
Justification
3.3. Firsure is concerned that the draft Local Plan does not reflect the Framework (2019). Firsure
is concerned that the housing requirement does not reflect economic growth ambitions, the
level of employment allocations, nor is it sufficient to meet the identified needs for affordable
housing. Further Firsure are concerned that there are insufficient housing allocations to meet
the housing requirement.
3.4. Firsure is concerned that there is a lack of up to date, available, and robust evidence base to
accompany the Plan, particularly in respect of an up to date Housing Needs Assessment, whilst
a 2019 update is referred to in the Plan, it is not yet publically available, the Viability Evidence
(May 2019), which requires further testing to support its conclusion, and specific evidence to
justify key policies.
3.5. Firsure consider that the Policies in the Local Plan are not justified and does not provide an
appropriate strategy. The Plan in its present form could fail to deliver sustainable development
in accordance with the policies in the Framework and is not consistent with national
policy.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
7
3.6. In these circumstances, Firsure do not consider the Doncaster Local Plan, in its
current form, to be sound.
3.7. However, Firsure consider that the plan can be made sound subject to proposed changes as
set out within the following sections of these representations. Firsure will continue to work
with the Council to develop appropriate modifications to the Local Plan.
Proposed Change
3.8. To overcome the objection and address soundness matters, the Council should:
• Identify a higher housing requirement to meet economic and affordable housing
ambitions and needs.
• Identify sufficient supply of housing to meet the identified housing requirement.
• Review and make available supporting evidence for the Plan as indicated in these
representations.
• Review and provide additional testing in the Whole Plan Viability Report; and
• Respond to the evidence and provide increased flexibility in the Plan, refer to
specific proposed changes under each policy.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
8
4. Policy 2: Spatial Strategy and Settlement Hierarchy (Strategic Policy)
4.1. Firsure is concerned that the Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version is
deficient in its content and evidence base and does not reflect national guidance.
Test of Soundness
4.2. Firsure considers that the Local Plan is unsound.
Which test of soundness are comments about?
X Positively Prepared X Effective
X Justified X Consistency with National Policy
Justification
4.3. Firsure is concerned with the Spatial Strategy and distribution. Firsure would expect the
spatial strategy and distribution to provide an appropriate development pattern and support
economic growth and sustainable development within all market areas.
4.4. The Strategy at present focusses growth towards Doncaster, followed by the Main Towns and
then a smaller element in the Service Towns and Larger Villages and then no development in
other defined villages. Therefore no new housing is proposed in the rural economy in
settlements which are relatively sustainable. This approach is broadly consistent with the
strategy set out in the UDP and subsequent Core Strategy. Firsure are concerned that this
focuses development in less viable areas and risks under delivery.
4.5. The implementation of the Spatial Strategy will be discussed in response to Policy 6 and the
proposed allocations.
4.6. Doncaster is an integral part of the Sheffield City Region and the ambitious growth aspirations.
The Strategic Economic Plan sets out the Sheffield City Region’s plans to transform the local
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
9
economy over the next decade. At the heart of the plan is the creation of 70,000 new private
sector jobs and 6,000 new businesses.
4.7. Therefore, to achieve the aspired growth that the City Region is seeking to achieve and is
securing Government funding for the level of new housing needs to reflect the ambitions of
the Strategic Economic Plan.
4.8. Furthermore, the Sheffield City Region Integrated Infrastructure Plan states:
A quality housing offer has a crucial role to play in the future economic growth of the City Region. It
is essential to attracting and retaining a skills base that supports inward investment as we as meeting
existing and future community needs and retention of Sheffield City Region (SCR) talent.
It has been identified that between 70,000 and 100,000 additional homes are needed in SCR to
support the proposed economic growth over the next 10 years. These will have the dual benefit of
providing accommodation that underpins the proposed increase in employment (70,000 jobs), as well
as the wider economic benefits that housing investment brings.
Housing forms a key component of the SCR construction sector. The CBI [CBI (2012) Bridging the
Gap – Backing the Construction Sector to Create Jobs] estimates that every £1 spent on construction
projects yields a total of £2.84 expenditure in the wider economy. It is estimated that approximately
£2,000 per annum per household spending on local convenience goods, and approximately £2,700
per annum per household spending on local comparison goods can be attributed to residents in new
housing. (Over the lifetime of the SEP, a similar amount would generate at least £400 million for the
SCR economy). The GVA benefits that can be attributable to new housing are as follows:
• Construction: material, labour professional skills and other services for construction, compounded
by supply chain benefits
• Household Maintenance Spend: Spend on products and services associated with each new
household
• Direct Job Uptake: GVA resulting from new productive workers moving into SCR, compounded by
their spend on SCR products and services
• Indirect (Chain) Benefits): As SCR residents move up the housing chain, this creates new available
space in different sub-markets.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
10
• Preventing Displacement: The type and location of construction may be important in mitigating
losses of households from the city region that might otherwise occur.
4.9. Within this context it is important that the Council plans for new jobs and associated new
homes in accordance with the Strategic Economic Plan growth aspirations.
4.10. To achieve this approach, Firsure consider the Local Plan should:
• Focus the majority of development upon Doncaster Main Urban Area
but review the likely housing yield from existing sites with planning
permission and proposed allocations to ensure that they can all be
delivered within the Plan Period. This is explained further in response
to Policy 3.
• To focus growth and regeneration on the Main Towns of appropriate scale for
their needs and the economic growth aspirations of the Borough. Rossington
should be an area of growth given the provision of new infrastructure, its location
near to Doncaster Airport, and the scale of economic growth planned at IPort.
Thorne and Moorends should grow to reflect its location, regeneration ambitions
connected with the logistics and employment parks, and level of facilities available
within the designated town and local centres. Within that context Carcroft and
Skellow is of similar scale to the Main Towns and should be identified as such,
particularly with its provision of employment parks and location on the A1(M)
and focus on regeneration and growth.
• Provision should be made in the Service Towns and Larger Villages to reflect their
scale and function. These are sustainable towns and villages which serve a
hinterland. Wadworth is of a similar scale and function of these settlements and
should therefore be defined as such, recognising its proximity and connectivity to
the Main Urban Area.
• Defined Villages are sustainable villages serving a rural economy and should
accommodate a level of development appropriate to their scale and function in
line with the provisions Framework (paragraph 78).
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
11
4.11. Firsure consider that the above approach meets the Local Plan vision and objectives identified
within the Local Plan but is also one that is more aligned with the principles of sustainable
development.
4.12. Policy 2 establishes the strategic approach to the Green Belt within Doncaster and states that
the general extent of the Green Belt will be retained. Firsure is concerned that Green Belt
boundaries have been drawn tightly around settlements and proposed allocations and as such
does not have regard to the intended permanence in the long term so that the boundaries
can endure beyond the Plan period. Policy 3 and 6 do not identify any safeguarded land. The
Plan does identify reserve sites. However these sites have significant technical constraints.
Firsure do not consider that they are suitable pool of sites due to the significant constraints
and object to their identification in the Plan.
4.13. Whilst there is no definitive guidance indicating the amount of land which should be
safeguarded the Framework (2019) is clear that where necessary Local Plans should ‘identify
areas of safeguarded land between the urban area and the Green Belt, in order to meet longer-term
development needs stretching well beyond the plan period’, and that local authorities should ‘be
able to demonstrate that Green Belt boundaries will not need to be altered at the end of the plan
period’. Given that the council considers that the majority of sites will be delivered within the
plan period. It is highly likely that further alterations to the green belt will be required at the
next review of the Plan. This is not consistent with the provisions of the Framework.
4.14. Firsure consider that Policy 2 should establish the approach to Safeguarding land and that
safeguarded land should be identified, not only provide a robust long-term Green Belt
boundary but will also provide certainty for residents and developers alike in terms of likely
growth locations beyond the end of the plan period. Firsure therefore suggest that such land
be allocated in the Plan across the spatial hierarchy, including smaller settlements per the
earlier spatial approach.
4.15. Firsure consider that the policy in its current form is not justified and is not consistent
with the Framework the Plan in its present form could fail to deliver sustainable
development in accordance with policies in the Framework. In these circumstances, we
do not consider the Doncaster Local Plan in its current form to be sound.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
12
4.16. However, Firsure consider that with the proposed changes to the strategy and establishing
the approach to safeguarding land the Local Plan can be found sound. Firsure will continue to
work with the Council to develop appropriate modifications to the Local Plan.
Proposed Change
4.17. To overcome the objection and address soundness matters, the Council should:
• Reflect economic and housing growth aspirations
• Amend the Spatial Strategy as indicated
• Identify safeguarded land or suitable Reserve Development Sites across the spatial
hierarchy
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
13
5. Policy 3: Level and Distribution of Growth (Strategic Policy)
5.1. Firsure is concerned that the Doncaster Local Plan Draft Policies and Proposed Sites is
deficient in its content and evidence base and does not reflect national guidance.
Test of Soundness
5.2. Firsure considers that the Local Plan is unsound.
Which test of soundness are comments about?
X Positively Prepared X Effective
X Justified X Consistency with National Policy
Justification
5.3. Firsure have a number of concerns in relation to the Level and Distribution of Growth. The
concerns relate to the following:
• The Local Plan housing requirement is not sufficient and is not fully aligned with
forecast economic growth.
• The Local Plan identifies significantly more employment land than the target for
provision established in Policy 3.
• There is a significant mismatch between the level of employment land allocated
and the level of housing land allocated in the Plan period; and
• The identified supply is not sufficient to meet the Councils identified
requirement.
Need
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
14
5.4. Firsure is concerned with the proposed level of new housing being planned for in the Local
Plan. Policy 3 makes provision for 18,400 dwellings to be delivered between 2015 and 2035,
equivalent to 920 net new homes each year. Policy 3 states that there should be sufficient
allocations for 15 years supply, which is 13,230 new homes.
5.5. Firsure has commissioned Regeneris Consulting to review the OAN and the Economic
Forecasts and Housing Needs Assessment (2018). The Regeneris report is attached to these
representations. Regeneris conclude that:
• The target delivers the minimum level of housing need for Doncaster based on
the standard method (585 dpa) and makes an upward adjustment to support
economic growth.
• The upward adjustment was based on evidence produced by PBA which
recommended housing need is presented as a range between 585 dpa (the
minimum) and 912 dpa. The upper limit was based on matching Jobs growth
aspirations of the Sheffield City Region LEP (1,420) over the period 2016 to
2026.
• However, PBA have made unjustified and unrealistic assumptions for a number
of factors which all suppress the level of housing required to support future
employment growth. In particular, we disagree with their assumptions about
commuting, double jobbing and household formation rates.
5.6. Regeneris consider that:
• Doncaster has been one of the fastest growing economies in Yorkshire and
Humber. The district has created around 24,000 jobs between 2000 and 2017,
representing a growth rate of 1.1% p.a
• Doncaster’s key asset is its connectivity by road, rail and air which has made it
a highly attractive location for inward investment, particularly for industrial and
logistics occupiers, with over 1.1m sq m of industrial/warehouse space taken up
since 2010.
• The strong performance is also due to a significant improvement in key
economic indicators, including skills and levels of enterprise. The business
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
15
start-up rate has more than doubled since 2010 and is now in line with the
national average. These improvements have removed a key barrier to growth
and mean that Doncaster is well placed to continue its high rate of growth.
• The Local Plan has set a target of delivering 481 hectares of employment land
between 2015 and 2035 and a number of ELR’s shows there continues to be
very strong market demand for industrial space in Doncaster. There is
therefore strong potential for Doncaster to accommodate high levels of inward
investment in future which would also drive jobs growth.
5.7. Firsure have concerns that the proposed housing requirement does not represent an
appropriate figure once consideration is given to the potential for economic growth and job
formation. Firsure continue to consider that an appropriate balance should be sought between
employment growth aspirations and the provision of homes.
5.8. The Framework (2019) reaffirms the Governments’ commitment to ‘significantly boosting the
supply of homes’ and states that ‘it is important that a sufficient amount and variety of land can
come forward where it is needed, that the needs of groups with specific housing requirements are
addressed’. It goes on to state ‘ to determine the minimum number of homes need, strategic policies
should be informed by a local housing need assessment, conducted using the standard method in
national planning guidance – unless exceptional circumstances justify and alternative approach which
also reflects current and future demographic trends and market signals’.
5.9. NPPG is clear that the standard method identifies a minimum annual housing need figure and
that it does not produce a housing requirement figure Paragraph 002 Reference ID: 2a-002-
20190220. It is also clear that the affordability adjustment within the standard methodology is
just to ensure that the minimum housing needs starts to address affordability of homes. It
therefore does not fully address affordability issues. Paragraph 006 Reference ID :2a-006-
201902020.
5.10. NPPG goes on to identify the circumstances when it is appropriate to plan for a higher housing
need figure than the standard methodology identifies. ‘The government is committed to ensuring
that more homes are built and supports ambitious authorities who want to plan for growth. The
standard method for assessing local housing need provides the minimum starting point in determining
the number of homes needed in an area…it does not predict the impact of future government policies,
changing economic circumstances or other factors that might have an impact on demographic
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
16
behaviour. Therefore there will be circumstances where it is appropriate to consider whether actual
housing need is higher than the standard method indicate.
5.11. This will need to be assessed prior to and separate from, considering how much of the overall need
can be accommodated. Circumstances where this may be appropriate include, but are not limited to
situations where increases in housing need are likely to exceed past trends because of:
5.12. Growth strategies for the area that are likely to be deliverable, for example where funding is in place
to promote and facilitate additional growth
5.13. Strategic infrastructure improvements that are likely to drive an increase in the homes needed
locally;
5.14. An authority agreeing to take on unmet need from neighbouring authorities, as set out in a statement
of common ground.
5.15. There may, occasionally be situations where previous levels of housing delivery in an area, or previous
assessments of need (such as a recently produced SHMA) are significantly greater than the outcome
from the standard method. Authorities will need to take this into account when considering whether
it is appropriate to plan for a higher level of need that the standard model suggests’. Paragraph 010
Reference ID: 2a-010-20190220.
5.16. The Council need to recognise that the development of new housing will bring forward
additional economic benefits to the area. The relationship between economic performance
in an area and housing is complex, but having the right quantity, quality and balance of housing
in an area is necessary for economic growth. The development of new housing can therefore
support local economic growth, both through direct job creation through the construction
phase of the scheme, but also through the increased population which will create sustainable
local jobs from the increased demand for goods and services. This provides an important
sustainable development opportunity for Doncaster.
5.17. Importantly the HBF released in July 2018 its report on “the economic footprint of house
building in England and Wales”, which shows that house building in England and Wales is now
worth £38bn a year and supports nearly 700,000 jobs. House building activity contributes
economically in different ways including providing jobs, tax revenues and contributing funding
for local infrastructure and communities. House building supports the economic in a wider
sense through being drive for economic growth; delivering jobs and economic value;
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
17
supporting labour market mobility; creating skills and employability; enhancing place
competitiveness; creating quality of place and reusing brownfield land.
5.18. An important conclusion of the report and the wider economic benefits is that a healthy, well-
functioning labour market requires a good supply of housing that is affordable for local people
to enable them to move jobs freely and match up skills supply with employer demand. A
dysfunctional housing market can inhibit labour market mobility, in turn stifling economic
growth.
5.19. Regeneris consider that Doncaster’s housing need over the plan period should be
1,100 dpa to support future economic growth. Regeneris consider that the target
of 920 dpa would risk constraining the future economic growth of Doncaster.
5.20. Furthermore, it is evident that the council are seeking to align economic growth with housing
growth and have identified provision above the local housing need figure to which the council
considers accounts for Job Led growth. However, the jobs led growth figure is based on jobs
growth forecast between 2015-2032. It is not clear whether consideration has been given to
the additional job growth expected to the end of the plan period. Therefore Firsure consider
there is potential for the jobs led scenario to underestimate the jobs growth over the full plan
period. The associated uplift to the housing requirement will therefore not be sufficient to
meet the full needs over the plan period.
5.21. Additionally, the Council have identified a requirement for 481 hectares of employment land
based on the Job Led scenario, and accounts for the extended plan period 2032-2035. The
explanatory text considers that this requirement is met through 117 hectares of land
developed between 2015-2018, 201 hectares of land benefiting from planning permission, and
164 hectares of allocated sites. However, there is a discrepancy between the totals in
paragraph 4.61 of the Plan and the figures arising from Tables E1 to E8. The sites that benefit
from planning permission in tables E1 to E8 equate to 284.09 ha of employment land available
within the Plan period. This leads to a total provision of 565.77 hectares of
employment land against a requirement of 481 hectares. It should be noted that
within the permissions identified in tables E1 to E8 that additional employment land is available,
adding to the potential supply. There is therefore a significant mismatch between the level of
planned employment provision in Policy 4 and the planned housing provision. Therefore, the
housing requirement needs to be uplifted to reflect the identified level of
employment land provision.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
18
5.22. As stated above NPPG indicates that consideration can be given to delivery rates, for the last
three years completions have been consistently higher than the proposed local plan target.
Net completions amount to 3211 dwellings, with annual completions as follows:
Year Net Completions
2015-16 1,025
2016/17 1,049
2017/18 1,137
Total 3,211
5.23. This demonstrates that there is sufficient demand to support a requirement above 920
dwellings per annum.
5.24. The Councils Economic Forecasts and Housing Needs Assessment (PBA, 2018) considers the
housing requirement prior against both the standard methodology, standard methodology
with an uplift for economic growth and previous approach for identifying housing need.
Following the earlier approach, PBA consider that an aspirational job led figure, based on the
SEP ambitions, would equate to a requirement of 1,073. PBA considered that it would be
prudent to plan for between 562 and 1073. To ensure that the requirement was realistic. It is
worthy of note that the Employment Land Needs Assessment (2019). Considers that the Job
led scenario was ambitious but realistic and notes the significant growth in Doncaster within
the previous 15 years in line with SCR growth aspirations. And further the evidence of land
take up and jobs growth for the period 2015-2018 was on target to meet 1% jobs growth per
annum. This would support a target at the higher end of the range.
5.25. There is therefore evidence of both delivery at a higher rate and recently published evidence
that indicates a higher need for housing. As stated above NPPG is clear that this evidence
should be taken into account when determining the housing requirement.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
19
5.26. When using the standard method the housing need figure was 585, applying a job led figure
to match the SEP led to a requirement of 912 (PBA, 2018). However this is not based on the
Jobs growth over the full plan period.
5.27. Firsure consider further evidence is required to demonstrate whether the affordable housing
needs of Doncaster can be met based on a target of 920. The explanatory text states that
the current need for affordable housing, 209 affordable units, represents 23 % of the Local
Plan requirement for housing. Paragraph 6.9 states that this does not take into account current
completions or viability. The completions affordable completions for the last three years (first
three years of the Local Plan) are as follows:
Year Affordable
Completions
Total Completions Affordable
completions
(%)
15/16 151 1,088 13.88
16/17 161 1,067 15.09
17/18 166 1,208 13.74
5.28. The total affordable completions falling below the identified affordable need, even when total
completions are higher than the proposed Local Plan requirement of 920. Further, Policy 8
identifies a requirement for 23% affordable housing in high/medium value areas and 15% in low
value areas. An as indicated in response to Policy 8 and Policy 67, this is demonstrated to be
unviable for a number of sites, including all types of sites in low value areas. Firsure are
therefore concerned that a target of 920 dwellings will not deliver sufficient number and range
of affordable homes to meet the identified need for affordable homes in the Borough. In order
to deliver 209 affordable dwellings per year, a requirement of at least 1,393 would be required.
This assuming the achievement of an average of 15% affordable housing, which represents the
highest achieved over the last three years of monitoring.
5.29. Firsure consider that there is sufficient evidence to pointing to the need for further uplift in
the Local Plan housing requirement, based on the significant mismatch between housing and
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
20
employment land allocations, the need to support the local plans economic ambitions,
evidence of delivery and the need to ensure sufficient delivery of affordable housing.
5.30. Firsure consider that the policy in its current form is not justified and is not consistent
with the Framework the Plan in its present form could fail to deliver sustainable
development in accordance with policies in the Framework. In these circumstances, we
do not consider the Doncaster Local Plan in its current form to be sound.
5.31. However, Firsure consider that with a higher requirement, of at least 1,100 to meet the
economic growth aspirations, and further uplifts to balance housing allocations with the
employment land allocations, and to ensure that the needs for affordable homes can be met
(up to 1393) that the Local Plan can be found sound. Firsure will continue to work with the
Council to develop appropriate modifications to the Local Plan
Housing Supply and Delivery
5.32. Firsure is concerned that the Council’s approach to delivering the housing requirement does
not appear to reflect national guidance.
5.33. The Council is not demonstrating sufficient flexibility in the supply of housing land to ensure
that the Plan can meet identified needs in full. The Framework is clear that plans should be
sufficiently flexible to adapt to rapid change, and emphasises the importance of ensuring that
a sufficient amount and variety of land can come forward where it is needed.
5.34. PPG is clear that careful attention should be given to providing an adequate supply of land,
and the Plan needs to be realistic about what can be achieved and when. Authorities need to
ensure that policies setting out contributions expected from development do not undermine
the deliverability of the Plan. (Paragraph 59 Reference ID: 61-059-20190315.
5.35. At present based on the Councils figures presented in the Local Plan, a Plan requirement of
18400, completions equating to 3400 and allocations equating to 16,055, there is a flexibility
of around 1055 dwellings which equates to 5% of the Local Plan Requirement. Firsure consider
that this is insufficient given the potential for non-delivery and under delivery of sites,
particularly from the dependency on a number of large sites. As set out in our response to a
number of policies within the plan and specifically Policies 8, 46, 66 and 67, Firsure are
concerned that some of the policies may undermine the deliverability of sites, or lead to the
need for further site specific viability testing impacting on the timing of delivery and therefore
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
21
there is a need for greater flexibility in the housing supply. Specific sites are identified later in
this section.
5.36. Firsure have a number of concerns relating to the supply in the Plan in terms of completions,
the allocations from permissions and the new allocations.
5.37. It is noted that the supply attributed to completions appears to be resultant from gross
completions rather than net completions. The Plan indicates that completions between 2015
and 2018 equate to 3400, However data in the Residential Land Availability Report indicates
that net completions amount to 3211. Which would serve to increase the residual
requirement based on an OAN of 920 to at least 15,189, and reduce the flexibility in the Plan
to 866 dwellings (4.7%).
5.38. With regards to overall supply from permissions and allocations, a housing trajectory has been
provided. Firsure are concerned that this demonstrates that the Council will struggle to
maintain a continuous supply of housing particularly in the later phases of the Plan period.
Only four sites are identified as being capable of delivery in the final years of the plan period
and two sites delivering beyond the plan period.
5.39. Furthermore, the Council’s HELAA and Residential Land Availability Report have a base date
of March 2018, thus a whole monitoring year is presently absent. This evidence base should
therefore be updated.
5.40. In terms of existing commitments it appears that the Council assumes 100% delivery and no
discount has been applied. Best Practice and Guidance suggests that at least a 10% discount
should be applied on sites with extant planning permission but this could vary depending on
site specific constraints and complexity. Firsure supports the discounting of sites with planning
permission but consider it may be beneficial to include a higher level of discount for large sites
to take into account unforeseen circumstances and delivery delays. Firsure consider therefore
that from a commitments pot of 9,488 dwellings a discount of at least circa 948 should be
applied, however this could feasibly be higher given the history and constraints of a number
of sites.
5.41. Firsure is concerned with the reliance on some existing housing sites with planning permission
and their potential delivery, particularly as some are fairly historic brownfield sites with
viability concerns in market challenging areas. There are a considerable number of outstanding
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
22
planning permissions in poor market areas, some of which are also constrained by flood risk.
Evidence of developer interest in such sites should be a fundamental requirement to provide
confidence on delivery. For example, a brief review of some sites being shown as
commitments shows considerable concern:
Site Ref Site Name No. of Dwellings Firsure Comment
838 Hexthorpe 930
There have been a number of planning applications and proposed schemes over the years, but there has been no delivery on site. Countryside PLC has submitted a planning application which the Environment Agency has objected to and recommended refusal. There is conflicting evidence in terms of delivery rates, with the Local Plan and the HELAA. There are significant flooding constraints affecting the site. No further deliverability evidence has been produced in the Doncaster 5 Year Deliverable Housing Land Supply Statement. The Residential Land Availability Study notes that at 31/03/2018 there were no completions and the site is not currently being developed.
843 Manor Farm, Bessacarr 1,009
This is a Persimmon / Charles Church scheme. However, delivery has become frustrated by the need to deliver infrastructure to complete development. Since there is only one developer on the site the development trajectory is likely to be modest and development of the site is unlikely to be achieved during the plan period. The Residential Land Availability Report indicates 39 completed in 17/18 which is below the rates expected in the Local Plan and HELAA. Which assumes delivery rates of around 70 dwellings a year. This is not realistic based on current delivery.
418 Unity/DN7 Initiative 905
The site has outline planning permission for 3,100 homes. No reserved matters have been submitted The site is in significant multiple ownership and understand that CPO procedures will be employed to facilitate the delivery of requisite infrastructure. Homes England is also assigning public funding to support the development. Given the presence of multiple landowners, the need for considerable public funding, the likelihood of a protracted timeframe to open up the site for development and the absence of confirmed market interest, the site is unlikely to deliver the Council’s prediction of 1015 homes in the plan period. The HELAA does not anticipate a start on site until years 6 to 10. However the local plan indicates a 175 completions in the first five years. Higher rates of delivery are expected in the following years (70 dwellings per annum). These rates are overly optimistic especially when compared to annual completions for individual sites recorded in the residential land availability report.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
23
Site Ref Site Name No. of Dwellings Firsure Comment
569 Askern Saw Mills 220
This is a long standing, unimplemented planning permission that has been available but has remained undeveloped. There is no developer interest and consequently the assumed delivery of 220 new homes is optimistic. Indicated in the Residential Land Availability Report that the outline permission has lapsed.
984 Former McCormick Tractors 600
This site has significant constraints. There is an outline permission relating to the development of the site. The Local Plan assumes a delivery rate of 56 dwellings per in the first five years and 64 dwellings per annum in the following years. This is overly optimistic and not consistent with the planning status and constraints on site.
940 E1 and E2
Land east of Poplars Farm 280/920
Site 940 is allocated in the plan for development of up to 280 dwellings (Part E1), Part E2 is identified as a reserved housing site for up to 920 dwellings. This site does not form a true reserve site. The council have identified a release mechanism which restricts the release of housing to net additional jobs delivered at the airport.
5.42. Firsure understands that no allowance has been made for demolitions. No evidence is
apparent and Firsure consider it would be appropriate for this evidence to be forthcoming.
5.43. The availability of land is crucial. To be considered deliverable the land needs to be available
now and in terms of developable there needs to be a reasonable prospect that land will be
available at the point envisaged. Firsure consider that sites which are not available or are
unknown should not be included in the Plan or a buffer should be provided due to the
uncertainty on delivery.
Site Ref Site Name No. of Dwellings Firsure Comment
1028 Tickhill 74
This site does not have access, therefore cannot be considered to be deliverable. Further, the capacity of the site is unrealistic. This is a 1.5 hectare site, a capacity of 44 dwellings would reflect the assumptions on net to gross developable area and density set out in the Viability Study.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
24
Site Ref Site Name No. of Dwellings Firsure Comment
662/247 Colliery Site, Rossington 897/237
The delivery rates on the site are overly optimistic. In 2017/18 there were only 49 completions on site 662. Assuming delivery rates based on past performance at this site then it is considered that only 600 dwellings will be capable of coming forward within the Plan period. This is significantly less than the 1127 homes forecast within the Plan.
081/343 Thorne 207
This is a longstanding allocation and there is little evidence available through the councils evidence base to demonstrate that there is developer interest or that the site will come forward in the short term.
795 Thorne 13
This site had permission which has since lapsed. There appears to be little developer interest in this site. The site is not considered to be deliverable.
510 Thorne 25
This is a narrow and constrained infill site, with railway forming the southern boundary of the site. There is little evidence available through the Councils evidence base to indicate any developer interest in the site.
165/186 Carcroft 300
This site is located to the western edge of the settlement and is relatively distant from the key services and facilities such as the train station, and employment opportunities. Other sites are located nearer to key services.
5.44. A high level assessment of some of the proposed allocations shows that some proposals are
at risk and hence one of the reasons why Best Practice suggests a buffer to the housing
requirement should be included in the Plan. Furthermore, would appear to have leant heavily
on allocating sites that already have planning permission as an alternative to identifying a
sufficient supply of new allocation sites to meet its requirement for the plan period.
Consequently, a number of settlements with strong sustainability credentials would appear to
have insufficient allocations to meet their needs through the life of the plan.
5.45. It would appear in some instances that there are unrealistic assumptions on gross to net
developable site areas and on the resultant yields from proposed allocations, especially when
considering some of the development requirements. Firsure therefore suggest that further
sites should be identified.
5.46. The Council therefore need a wider choice of sites across a number of different areas and
market areas to gain traction and increase build rates. To achieve the housing requirement
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
25
the Council need at least 30-35 housing outlets operating across the Borough for every year
of the Plan and Firsure do not believe the Plan can deliver this, particularly in the middle to
later years.
5.47. Firsure considers the Council should be more realistic on the potential delivery on sites,
particularly on sites which have not commenced preparations of securing the relevant planning
permission and developer interest and on build rates. Firsure consider that the sites with no
planning permission should not be providing completions until 2023/24 (which is two years
post adoption) as there is significant work and preparations to commence on site, including
time to prepare and submit the planning application, gain planning permission, discharge
conditions, legal agreements, site preparations, and commence house building. This process
can take around 2 years.
5.48. Firsure would be happy to work through the specific sites in detail with the Council to seek
to reach agreement on the HELAA and current housing commitments. Interestingly, in line
with the general direction of travel for this Local Plan the new Framework (2019) defines the
term Deliverable in the glossary stating that sites can only be considered deliverable where
they have detailed planning permission. If they have outline planning permission or are
allocated in a plan a site can only be considered if there is clear evidence that housing
completions will begin on site within five years. The level of evidence that must be provided
to demonstrate that sites are deliverable has therefore been tightened.
5.49. Firsure considers that the main risks to the delivery of the housing requirement are slippages
in the delivery of allocations, longer lead-in times, reduced housing capacity on sites, sites no
longer coming forward as result of viability from policy obligations set out in the Local Plan.
Given these risks Firsure would suggest a greater flexibility is incorporated into the Local Plan
especially in light of Firsure’ conclusions on the actual housing requirement.
5.50. Firsure would encourage the Council to review the existing commitments to ensure this is
still deliverable, whether there is a housebuilder on board and whether there are any
constraints preventing development from coming forward. Firsure would also ask the Council
to look at the proposed delivery of site allocations to determine whether the delivery rates
are appropriate and the sites are deliverable in light of the policy obligations proposed in the
Local Plan.
5.51. Taking into account the above, the Council should be making provision for:
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
26
Council Figures Firsure’s View
Annual Housing Requirement 920 1,100
Total Requirement (2015-2035) – which is 15 years post
adoption
18,400 22,000
Completions 3,400 3,211
Total Commitments 9,488 9,488
Non-Delivery Allowance (at least 10%) 948.8 948.8
Total Allocations 6,567 6,567
Total Supply 18,506 18,317.2
Residual homes to be identified -106.2 3,682.2
5.52. Therefore, on a best case scenario Firsure consider as a minimum there needs to be
circa 3,682 new homes to be identified in the Plan to account for net completions, and
economic growth.
5.53. This does not account for the uplift required to ensure affordable housing need is met in full,
which as indicated in paragraph 5.28, would lead to a requirement of 1,393 dpa and a plan
requirement of 27,860. Based on the current supply of 3,211 completions, 9,488
commitments, an allowance for 10% non–implementation, and the currently proposed
allocations of 6,567 homes, this would lead to need for a further 9,542 additional homes.
5.54. Significantly, the scenarios above do not balance housing provision with the additional
employment allocations. The additional employment allocations amount to 83.77 hectares
above the requirement, this is the equivalent of an additional 3.5 years supply of land. As a
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
27
result in order to balance the housing provision with the additional employment supply circa
3850 additional homes would be required, this amounts to an annual requirement of 1,292.5
dpa. Firsure consider circa 7,532 additional homes are required in order to balance
the Housing with Employment supply, account for net completions and
appropriate non-implementation rates.
Firsure’s View
Employment requirement 2015-2035 481 hectares
Annual employment requirement 24 hectares
Employment land developed 2015-2018 117
Sites with planning permission Tables E1 to E8 284.09
New employment allocations Policy 4 164.68
Total Allocations 565.77
Amount of land allocated over the requirement 83.77
Additional homes required to balance with
employment land supply
3,850
Residual homes to be identified 7,532.2
5.55. These figures assume no changes to the currently identified housing sites, which, in response
to policy 3 and policy 6, Firsure have raised significant concerns, particularly with regards the
deliverability, capacity, and delivery rates of some sites and the overreliance on existing
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
28
permissions or longstanding allocations. This does not account for additional economic
growth associated with the airport
5.56. Furthermore, there does not appear to be any safeguarded sites or genuinely deliverable
reserve sites identified within the Draft Plan. This is concerning given Policy 6 states that the
Plan will designated Reserve Development Sites. However, it states that the reserves sites
identified are not considered developable in the plan period. Paragraph 4.43 of the Plan
indicates that the reserve sites have flood risk mitigation issues or safeguarding issues
associated with HS2 preventing them from coming forward. Firsure would suggest, in order
to assist with flexibility, that safeguarded sites be proposed in accordance with national
guidance. The only other reserve site is related to direct job growth at the Airport and is
strictly controlled, thus does not provide flexibility for the Plan as a whole.
5.57. The above scenarios do not include a detailed analysis of existing commitments and proposed
allocations, however from a high level analysis it is evident that the Council’s trajectory and
analysis of sites is optimistic.
5.58. Therefore, with an increased housing requirement, reduced potential from
existing planning permissions sites and incorporation of a flexibility allowance,
further land will need to be identified.
5.59. Firsure consider that the appropriate areas and sites to accommodate growth would be:
• Site 302 and 305: Stripe Road, Rossington
5.60. A brief summary is provided for this site in response to Policy 6. Technical information
and a report on the Role and Growth of Rossington is submitted alongside these
representations. This report will be supported by significant technical information and the
report will demonstrate that the sites are available, suitable and achievable and therefore
deliverable in accordance with the Framework and PPG.
5.61. Firsure consider that the policy in its current form is not justified and is not consistent
with the Framework the Plan in its present form could fail to deliver sustainable
development in accordance with policies in the Framework. In these circumstances, we
do not consider the Doncaster Local Plan in its current form to be sound.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
29
5.62. However, Firsure consider that with an appropriate uplift to the housing requirement,
consideration of net completions, non-implementation rates and the allocation of additional
land and safeguarded sites that the Local Plan can be found sound. Firsure will continue to
work with the Council to develop appropriate modifications to the Local Plan.
Proposed Change
5.63. To overcome the objection and address soundness matters, the Council should:
• Increase housing requirement to 1,100 to 1,300 dwellings over the plan period.
• Reduce the potential from current commitments and include a non-delivery
allowance.
• Identify safeguarded land.
• Allocate:
o Site 302 and 305: Stripe Road, Rossington
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
30
6. Policy 6: Housing Allocations (Strategic Policy)
6.1. Firsure objects to Policy 6 and the proposed distribution of housing and that the following
site is not a proposed allocations:
• Site 302 and 305: Stripe Road, Rossington
6.2. The site is summarised below and technical information and advocacy report have
been submitted alongside earlier representations. Further a report on the Role
and Growth of Rossington is submitted alongside these representations.
Test of Soundness
6.3. Firsure considers that the Local Plan is currently unsound.
Which test of soundness are comments about?
X Positively Prepared X Effective
X Justified X Consistency with National Policy
Justification
6.4. Firsure is concerned that the Local Plan is not producing sufficient homes across the Borough.
Further to comments in relation to Policy 3 Firsure recommends that further sites are
identified to meet and exceed the requirement but also to provide a sufficient buffer to deal
with any under-delivery which is likely to occur from some sites. Such an approach would be
consistent with the Framework requirements for the plan to be positively prepared and
flexible.
6.5. Firsure is concerned that the proposed distribution of new homes does not reflect the spatial
strategy, but importantly does not address the focus for economic and housing growth across
the Sheffield City Region and Yorkshire and Humber as a whole.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
31
6.6. The proposed distribution against the Council’s own targets shows a deficiency and a
significant under provision in:
• Doncaster • Adwick • Conisbrough – Denaby • Mexborough • Thorne – Moorends • Sprotbrough • Tickhill • Bawtry
6.7. Firsure, as explained in response to Policy 2 and the spatial strategy considers that the spatial
strategy is incorrect, that it does not provide for the growth of the Borough and does not
reflect the role, function and location of the settlements.
6.8. Firsure, as explained in response to Policy 2 and 3, considers that there needs to be further
provision of housing and a slightly amended approach to the spatial strategy, which focusses
growth towards Doncaster. There should be further growth of Rossington to address
regeneration and the provision of new infrastructure. There should be growth in Thorne-
Moorends, and a regeneration focus in Carcroft-Skellow which should elevate the status of
the settlement commensurate to its role and function. New housing should be provided in
Tickhill to address the current under provision. Wadworth should accommodate some new
housing to reflect its role and function and provision should also be made in the villages to
address the rural economy.
6.9. Firsure is particularly concerned that in Rossington there is only a single small housing
allocation and an over reliance on one large allocated (formed by site 662 and 247). The role
of Rossington should be the focus for growth and regeneration, given its strategic location
next to the M18 with new infrastructure in the form of the Great Yorkshire Way, provision
of major employment opportunities at i-Port and the airport, forming the largest employment
allocations within Doncaster, which are adjacent to the settlement. Furthermore, the
proposed new PGA golf course is adjacent to Rossington. With major expansion plans at the
airport ‘Aetropolis’, Rossington is in a prime strategic location to benefit from such plans and
associated housing should be provided to ensure Doncaster benefits from such inward
investment. Firsure proposes that their site at Stripe Road can accommodate new housing
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
32
6.10. Further Firsure are concerned about the deliverability of a number of allocations within
Rossington.
6.11. Site 662 and 247: The Colliery site. The Role and Growth of Rossington document considers
the delivery rates currently achieved at the site. In 2017/18 there were 49 completions on
site. Assuming delivery rates based on current and past performance at this site, then Firsure
consider that only approximately 600 units will come forward on the Colliery site(s) within
the Plan period. This is significantly below the delivery expected within the Local Plan which
anticipates that 1127 homes can be delivered across the Colliery site(s). No further evidence
on this site is put forward in the Doncaster five year deliverable housing land supply statement
6.12. Site 1056 – Former Torndale School Playing fields, This relatively small site is considered to
be capable of delivering 92 dwellings. This is overly optimistic given the irregular shape of the
site. The local plan identifies the site as delivering in years 6-10, thus the site does not appear
to be capable of assisting with short term delivery in Rossington.
6.13. Based on the above it is clear that the deliverability and delivery rates of some of the sites in
Doncaster ought to be reviewed to ensure that they reflect the site specific circumstances.
Further allocations are required in to ensure that the delivery of the plans strategy.
6.14. Furthermore, there does not appear to be any safeguarded sites identified within the Local
Plan. This is concerning given Policy 6 states that the Plan will designated Reserve
Development Sites, yet those identified are not considered to be developable within the Plan
Period due to significant constraints relating to flood risk and HS 2 Safeguarding, thus could
not be relied on to maintain the supply of housing should other sites fail to deliver in the Plan
period. As indicated in response to Policy 3 Firsure suggest, that safeguarded sites be
proposed, to provide additional flexibility in accordance with national guidance.
6.15. Firsure consider that the policy in its current form is not justified and is not consistent
with the Framework the Plan in its present form could fail to deliver sustainable
development in accordance with policies in the Framework. In these circumstances, we
do not consider the Doncaster Local Plan in its current form to be sound.
6.16. However, Firsure consider that with the allocation of site 302 and 305: Stripe Road,
Rossington and adjustment in anticipated delivery within the plan period of sites 662 and 247
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
33
that the Local Plan can be found sound. Firsure will continue to work with the Council to
develop appropriate modifications to the Local Plan.
6.17. To address these deficiencies in the Plan Firsure therefore suggest that the following sites be
allocated:
• Site 302 and 305: Stripe Road, Rossington
6.18. A short summary of the site is in the following sub-section and technical
information and advocacy report have been attached to earlier representations.
The Role and Growth of Rossington report is attached in support of the site.
Site 302 and 305: Stripe Road, Rossington
6.19. Firsure is particularly concerned that in Rossington there is only a single small housing
allocation and an over reliance on one large existing commitment. The role of Rossington
should be the focus for growth and regeneration, given its strategic location next to the M18
with new infrastructure in the form of the Great Yorkshire Way, provision of major
employment opportunities at i-Port and the airport, which are adjacent to the settlement.
Furthermore, the proposed new PGA golf course is adjacent to Rossington. With major
expansion plans at the airport ‘Aetropolis’, Rossington is in a prime strategic location to
benefit from such plans and associated housing should be provided to ensure Doncaster
benefits from such inward investment. Firsure proposes that their site at Stripe Road can
accommodate new housing to meet that need.
6.20. Firsure objects that Site 302 and 305 at Stripe Road, Rossington site is not allocated
and should be identified as a housing site. It is noted that the councils site selection
summary indicates that this is because Green Belt release cannot be justified as housing need
is being met. However in our response to Policy 2, 3 and 6, Firsure maintain that the Plan
does not identify sufficient sites to meet the needs of the area,
6.21. Firsure considers the proposed site is available, suitable and achievable and is therefore in
accordance with the Framework a deliverable site able to come forward in the short term.
6.22. The deliverability and benefits of the Stripe Road, Rossington site is as follows:
Overview of Proposals
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
34
6.23. The site is located on the edge of an established residential area and benefits from easy access
to the full range of services and facilities located within Rossington. The site is surrounded by
urban development with residential development on two sides and the East Coast Mainline.
The site is approximately 18.5ha gross and could accommodate in the region of 500 new
homes.
Deliverability
6.24. The site at Stripe Road, Rossington provides a development opportunity that is available,
suitable and achievable and therefore it is considered that the site is deliverable, in accordance
with national planning policy and guidance. It is promoted by Firsure which further
demonstrates the site’s deliverability within the plan period.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
35
Availability
6.25. The land is being promoted by Firsure. The site is therefore available in accordance with the
Framework and the National Planning Practice Guidance (PPG).
6.26. The proposed development can make an efficient and attractive use of the land. The site
represents an excellent opportunity for future housing and development. This site allows
housing to be delivered within an appropriate and sustainable location within Rossington.
Suitability
6.27. The site is located in a highly sustainable location and has residential development to the north,
east and west. The site is within easy walking distance to local centres with a range of facilities
provided there as well as greater facilities within Doncaster Town Centre, a bus ride away.
There are a large number of primary and a secondary schools in the vicinity of the site.
6.28. The site is well served by buses providing opportunities for sustainable travel to work in
Doncaster and beyond with access to Doncaster Railway Station.
6.29. The development will provide additional quality development that will benefit Rossington and
the wider district with economic, environmental and social benefits. It is therefore considered
that the development is suitable.
Green Belt
6.30. Due to the significant need and demand for housing and aspirations for economic and housing
growth there is clearly a requirement for a strategic review of the approach to locations for
future growth within the district. In order to plan for appropriate for the plan period there
is a need to review the Green Belt boundaries. A thorough review of the development limits
of Doncaster settlements would ensure a holistic approach to the location of development
for the future of the Borough.
6.31. The housing needs of Doncaster are putting severe pressure on the local authority to review
the Green Belt. To meet the housing requirement Doncaster Council recognises that some
Green Belt land will need to be released for new housing land. Stripe Road, Rossington is a
unique opportunity to positively use the Green Belt and meet the housing need for the area.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
36
6.32. In the Borough of Doncaster approximately 46% of the area is designated as Green Belt. This
is the western part of the Borough which forms part of the South Yorkshire Green Belt
surrounding urban areas.
6.33. The Framework explains that there are five purposes of including land within the Green Belt,
which is:
1. To check the unrestricted sprawl of large built up areas;
2. To prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another;
3. To assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment;
4. To preserve the setting and special character of historic towns; and
5. To assist in urban regeneration by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.
6.34. Contextually, the site is “contained” by development and activity being a “tongue” of land
which protrudes into the urban area of Rossington surrounded by residential properties and
the East Coast Main Line, beyond which is non-Green Belt countryside. Within this context
the release of the site from the Green Belt has limited impact on “openness” and that
redevelopment of the site would have low impact on the purposes of including land within the
Green Belt.
6.35. The Framework states that Green Belt boundaries should be drawn so as not to include land
which it is unnecessary to keep permanently open. The impact on the openness of the Green
Belt will be limited. The site is bounded by the urban area to the north, and partially to the
east and west. To the south is an established track from Stripe Road to a level crossing with
a tree belt to the south of it. This track and tree belt form a robust new urban boundary. The
tree belt will prevent views between the remainder of the Green Belt and the site.
6.36. The site is therefore “contained” and will not lead to unrestricted sprawl or encroachment.
The site is a protrusion of Green Belt into Rossington and is contained within its setting. The
site would not therefore lead to the coalescence of towns. Whilst the development would
result in development of some countryside the degree of encroachment into the countryside
would be minimised. The site has no impact upon the setting of a historic town.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
37
6.37. Firsure propose that the new Green Belt boundary follows Stripe Road, Common Lane and
the East Coast Main Line which is clear and well defined and would be a “rounding off” of
Rossington. This boundary would accord with the Framework and ensure that the Green Belt
is clearly defined using readily recognisable features to ensure permanency reinforcing the
urban context whilst providing a robust boundary for the future.
6.38. All the boundaries have the potential to be further reinforced within the site through
additional planting to ensure an effective transition between the development and the
countryside beyond.
Achievable
6.39. A range of technical work is being undertaken and further survey work is ongoing. From the
initial assessments there are no technical issues that would prevent development or are
insurmountable. The site is therefore considered to be achievable and therefore deliverable
in accordance with national guidance. The technical assessments will be submitted in due
course and are available upon request.
Effective Use of Land
6.40. Although the site is greenfield, the proposed scheme will utilise and enhance existing
infrastructure. Although the site is not previously developed it is currently under-utilised.
The site is easily accessible and the proposed main access is off Stripe Road. The scheme is
therefore making an efficient and effective use of land and infrastructure.
Delivering a Flexible Supply of Housing
6.41. The Framework requires Local Planning Authorities to meet their full objectively assessed
housing need. Firsure considers that the site at Stripe Road, Rossington is deliverable in the
short term and will reinforce the housing supply and address the Borough’s housing needs in
the early periods of the Local Plan. The site is fully capable of being delivered in the next 5
years.
A Positive Response to the Key Objectives of the Framework
6.42. The Framework sets out that the Governments key housing policy goal of boosting
significantly the supply of housing and proactively driving and supporting sustainable economic
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
38
development to deliver homes, business and industrial units, infrastructure and thriving local
places that the country needs. The Framework explains that the supply of new homes can
sometimes be best achieved through planning for larger scale development, such as extensions
to towns, and creating mixed and sustainable communities with good access to jobs, key
services and infrastructure. Sites should also make effective use of land and existing
infrastructure.
6.43. In relation to the Framework:
• The proposal responds positively towards national guidance.
• The site is appropriate for accommodating housing growth, being an expansion of an existing settlement.
• The proposed site is accessible to existing local community facilities, infrastructure and services, including public transport.
• The site has been assessed and is available, suitable and achievable for development
Benefits of Stripe Road, Rossington
6.44. The development of the site would provide significant benefits. The site would provide
housing that would meet the needs of the Rossington and Doncaster Borough housing market.
Therefore this site provides a unique opportunity in a sustainable location.
6.45. In accordance with the Framework this representation has shown that:
• The site is suitable for housing and can deliver circa 500 new homes.
• The proposal will deliver high quality housing.
• The proposal will deliver affordable housing.
• The proposal can provide a good mix of housing commensurate to the demand
and need in the area.
• The scheme uses land efficiently and effectively.
• The proposal is in line with planning for housing objectives.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
39
• The site is within a sustainable location situated in close proximity to facilities
and services and also to bus stops for local bus routes.
• The scheme will create direct and indirect job opportunities both during and
after construction.
6.46. The proposal is an appropriate site to provide for the housing needs of Rossington and
Doncaster in the short term. The allocation of the site would confirm its potential to help
continue the provision of a balanced housing supply in the Borough in sustainable locations.
The site can deliver a full range and mix of housing and a sustainable community. Development
of the site would deliver housing and affordable housing. Doncaster needs to have a robust
housing trajectory and the site at Stripe Road, Rossington would assist with this delivery in
the short term. The site is situated within a prime location suitable for residential
development and as such would facilitate the development of land in a more effective and
efficient manner. Development of the site would not harm or undermine the areas wider
policy objectives, but seeks to reinforce the need to develop sites within sustainable locations
as a priority.
6.47. The site is available, suitable and achievable and therefore deliverable in accordance with the
Framework.
Proposed Change
6.48. To overcome the objection and address soundness matters, the Council should:
• Allocate:
o Site 302 and 305: Stripe Road, Rossington
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
40
7. Policy 8: Delivering the Necessary Range of Housing
7.1. Policy 8 seeks to ensure the right range, type, size and tenure of homes are delivered within
Doncaster. Firsure is concerned with some aspects of this policy, and the robustness of the
whole plan viability. Firsure therefore consider that the Policy 8 is unsound.
Test of Soundness
7.2. Firsure considers that the Doncaster Local Plan – Publication Version 2015-2035 is unsound.
Which test of soundness are comments about?
X Positively Prepared X Effective
X Justified X Consistency with National Policy
Justification
7.3. Firsure is concerned with a number of approaches and criteria established within Policy 8.
Housing Mix
7.4. Firsure is supportive of the principle of providing a broad mix of housing. However the Local
Plan should not dictate housing mix across the borough. The local Plan should achieve this
housing mix through identifying the level of provision and the broad distribution of new
housing.
7.5. Importantly there does not appear to be an up to date Strategic Housing Market Assessment
with the Housing Needs Survey being dated 2015 with an update in 2016. The Economic
Forecasts and Housing Needs Assessment does not consider housing mix. The Housing needs
survey summary 2019 (ARC4) only appears to deal with the total affordable need and size of
affordable dwellings, in terms of number of bedrooms. Therefore there is a lack of evidence
base for this policy approach. It is acknowledged that Appendix 4 summarises the findings of
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
41
the housing need survey 2019, however the full study is not yet publically available Firsure
reserve the right to comment further when this becomes available.
7.6. Although SHMA and Appendix 4 of the Plan, derived from the Housing Need Study 2019,
considers the broad issues of housing mix, the Local Plan should not seek to control the
housing mix, since it would mean that the market would be unable to adjust to changes in the
market. Policy 8 seeks to specifically address the housing mix on sites. This aspect of the policy
is onerous and prescriptive, particularly as it is seeking to control the size of units, mix and
tenure. The policy should be amended to encourage or reflect, rather than require.
7.7. It is unclear from the Whole Plan Viability Study how the identified mix has been taken into
account. An average size of dwelling of 92.90 has been assumed for the purposes of the testing.
This appears to be based on a general assumption of 30% 2 bed dwellings 40 % 3 bed dwellings,
and 30 % 4 bed dwellings. This does not align with the mix sought through the Local Plan,
detailed in appendix 4 and derived from the housing needs study 2019.
7.8. Firsure recommend that a flexible approach is taken regarding housing mix, which recognises
that the need and demand will vary from area to area and site to site, to ensure that the
scheme is viable, and provides an appropriate mix for the location. There is a real need to
create a housing market in Doncaster that will attract investors to Doncaster and provide an
element of aspiration to ensure working people and families are retained within the area. The
evidence presented in the plan is time limited, and only identifies current deficits. Firsure has
been unable to review the full findings of the Housing Needs Study 2019, and reserves the
right for further comment in this regard. However, Firsure considers that the mix required
by policy 8 has not been appropriately tested in terms of viability and considers Policy 8 Part
A to be unsound. The policy should be amended to encourage to reflect the identified mix
rather than require it.
Affordable housing
7.9. Firsure is supportive of the need for affordable housing. The Framework is however clear that
affordable housing policies must not only take account of need but also viability. Paragraph
34 of the Framework (2019) established the importance of viability to ensure that
development identified in the Plan should not be subject to such a scale of obligations and
policy burden that their ability to be delivered might be threatened.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
42
7.10. The updated viability (2019), builds upon the earlier assessment and updates it in line with the
emerging policies and the revised Framework. The assessment continues to identify three
market value areas (low, medium and high) within Doncaster.
7.11. Tables 3-14 of the 2016 Viability Report show the issues of viability for a number of sites. It
shows that the schemes in the low value areas were not able to support any level of affordable
housing, whilst a number of schemes in the medium value areas would also struggle to provide
the 15 percent required by this policy.
7.12. The 2016 Viability report previously concluded that sites located within high value areas are
comfortably viable with the Councils proposed affordable housing provision of 25%, together
with draft S106 policies. However for sites within medium to low value areas it was noted
that the viability pressure was greater, and a reduced requirement should be adopted.
7.13. The 2019 Whole Plan Viability Study assesses the impact of the Plan requirements.
Appendices 3 to 10 of the 2019 Whole Plan Viability Study demonstrate viability issues for a
number of site typologies, including all typologies in low value areas. Typologies in low value
areas were unviable when tested against the base assumptions. The study concluded that in
high and medium value areas site typologies were comfortably viable. However, there are
some circumstances were there are viability pressures in medium value areas, significantly the
additional policy costs and sensitivities were tested against the study’s base assumptions which
notably included 15% affordable housing and not 23% sought by Policy 8.
7.14. Firsure are concerned that there is little evidence to support an affordable housing target of
15% in low value areas. Firsure consider that further viability evidence is required to support
the target of 23% in combination with the policy requirements of the plan, including, mix,
housing design standards, and density. Further there is limited justification in the Plan or
associated evidence for a target of 23% affordable housing. The explanatory text states that
the current need for affordable housing represents 23% of the Local Plan requirement for
housing. Paragraph 6.9 states that this does not take into account current completions or
viability.
7.15. Firsure is concerned that with all the policy requirements the Local Plan details this could
undermine the provision of affordable housing through the need for a viability assessment of
schemes on a regular basis. The viability assessment shows that a significant proportion of
sites will not be able to achieve affordable housing due to viability matters. The Government
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
43
is keen to avoid such a situation where viability assessments are being submitted regularly to
vary planning policy obligations. The Council must be aware of the impact that viability
assessments and subsequent negotiation of obligations can have on the delivery of
development. This could impact on the delivery of the housing target. Instead, the Council
should ensure this policy is appropriately tested to ensure the sites identified and allocated
are deliverable.
7.16. The Council should be mindful that it is unrealistic to negotiate every site on a one by one
basis because the base-line aspiration of a policy or combination of policies is set too high as
this will jeopardise future housing delivery. Therefore, site by site negotiations on these sites
should occur occasionally rather than routinely.
Adaptable and Accessible Homes
7.17. Part D of the policy states that new development should aim to include the provision of homes
which are adaptable, accessible and suitable for people with a wide range of needs. Firsure
supports the adaptation of the existing stock and encouraging the provision of adaptable,
accessible homes. However, as explained in response to Policy 46 Firsure object and does
not consider it appropriate to require all developments to include this provision.
Custom and Self Build Homes
7.18. Firsure understands the need and supports the delivery of Self-Build and Custom Build
housing. Firsure understands the idea of increasing the self-build and custom build sector for
its potential contribution to the overall housing supply.
7.19. Firsure consider that further evidence should be provided in respect of the level of demand
in Doncaster for self and custom build and the nature of demand, including, whether those
wanting to self-build would actually consider building within a larger housing development. As
it stands paragraph 6.3 of the Plan provides very little explanation or evidence to support the
policy.
7.20. Firsure consider that the requirements in Policy 8 are not justified and do not provide an
appropriate strategy. Firsure consider that Policy 8 along with other policy requirements
within the Plan could threaten the deliverability of the Plan. The Plan in its present form could
fail to deliver sustainable development in accordance with the policies in the Framework and
is not consistent with national policy.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
44
7.21. In these circumstances, we do not consider the Doncaster Local Plan, in its
current form, to be sound.
7.22. However, Firsure consider that with increased flexibility in Part A, revised affordable housing
targets, and increased flexibility in the approach on custom and self build alongside robust
evidence supporting the requirements the Local Plan can be found sound. Firsure will continue
to work with the Council to develop appropriate modifications to the Local Plan.
Proposed Change
7.23. To overcome the objection and address soundness matters, the Council should:
• Policy 8 Part A should be amended to so that developers are encouraged to reflect
the identified mix on schemes rather than require it”.
• Review the approach to affordable housing to ensure it reflects the new Framework
(2019) and that the evidence base and viability approach is robust and credible.
• Include a flexible approach on accessible and adaptable homes and ensure the evidence
base is robust and credible.
• Include a flexible approach on custom build and self-build homes and ensure the
evidence base is robust and credible.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
45
8. Policy 19: Development affecting public rights of way
8.1. Firsure is concerned with aspects of Policy 19.
Test of Soundness
8.2. Firsure considers that the Doncaster Local Plan – Publication Version 2015-2035 is unsound.
Which test of soundness are comments about?
X Positively Prepared X Effective
X Justified X Consistency with National Policy
Justification
8.3. Firsure is concerned with part D of the policy which states that “unrecorded routes or desire
lines that cross development sites” will be treated in the same way as definitive public rights
of way.
8.4. Firsure considers that such an approach on non-definitive footpaths is onerous and restrictive
and could hinder the delivery of schemes. The effect of such a restrictive approach coupled
with requirements for on-site open space, national space standards, requirements on mix and
other policy standards, there could be implications for potential housing schemes and their
delivery and the ability to achieve the housing requirement.
8.5. Firsure consider that the Policy as it stands is not justified and does not provide an
appropriate strategy. In these circumstances, we do not consider the Doncaster
Local Plan, in its current form, to be sound.
8.6. Firsure consider that the policy with increased flexibility or removal of part D of Policy 19 it
can be made sound. Firsure will continue to work with the Council to develop appropriate
wording.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
46
Proposed Change
8.7. To overcome the objection and address soundness matters, the Council should:
• Incorporate flexibility or remove part D of the policy.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
47
9. Policy 20: Access, design and layout of public rights of way
9.1. Firsure is concerned with aspects of Policy 20 and therefore consider that the Policy 20 is
unsound.
Test of Soundness
9.2. Firsure considers that the Doncaster Local Plan – Publication Version 2015-2035 is unsound.
Which test of soundness are comments about?
X Positively Prepared X Effective
X Justified X Consistency with National Policy
Justification
9.3. Firsure is concerned with parts B and C of the policy which specifies the routes and
dimensions of public rights of way.
9.4. Firsure considers that such an approach is onerous and restrictive and could hinder the
delivery of schemes. The requirements for public rights of way to avoid estate roads and
where the path is enclosed to be of 3 to 5 metres is over engineered and beyond what is
required.
9.5. The effect of such a restrictive approach coupled with requirements for on-site open space,
national space standards, requirements on mix and other policy standards, there could be
implications for potential housing schemes and their delivery and the ability to achieve the
housing requirement.
9.6. Firsure consider that the policy in its present form is not justified and consider that
the Plan is unsound.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
48
9.7. Firsure consider that the Plan with greater flexibility or the removal of the restrictive elements
of Policy 20 the Plan can be made sound. Firsure will continue to work with the Council to
develop appropriate wording.
Proposed Change
9.8. To overcome the objection and address soundness matters, the Council should:
• Incorporate flexibility or remove the restrictive elements in parts B and C of the
policy.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
49
10. Policy 29: Open Space Provision in New Developments
10.1. Firsure is concerned that the level of new greenspace sought on sites will hinder the ability to
deliver new housing efficiently and effectively, therefore consider that the Policy 29 is unsound.
Test of Soundness
10.2. Firsure considers that the Doncaster Local Plan – Publication Version 2015-2035 is unsound.
Which test of soundness are comments about?
X Positively Prepared X Effective
X Justified X Consistency with National Policy
Justification
10.3. Firsure welcome the revision to the requirement in Part A of the policy which previously
required 56sqm of open space per family dwelling. The requirement has been slightly reduced
and now seeks between 10 and 15% of the site to be open space on schemes over 20 dwellings.
The explanatory text indicates that 15% is required where there is an existing deficiency in
open space. Firsure still consider that coupled with national space standards, requirements on
mix and other policy standards, there could be implications for potential housing schemes and
their delivery and the ability to achieve the housing requirement.
10.4. Part B of the policy requires that where sites are adjacent or close to a large open spaces as
an alternative to on site open space, a commuted sum of 10 – 15% of the residential land value
of the site should be provided. This is excessive, the commuted sum should be derived through
consideration of specific local deficiencies in open space provision. The level of commuted
sum could undermine the deliverability of the Plan and is not consistent with the principles of
the Framework (paragraph 34). Nor is it consistent with the tests for planning obligations (
paragraph 56 of the Framework), which seek to ensure that planning obligations are necessary
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
50
to make the development acceptable, directly related to the development and fairly and
reasonably related in scale and kind to the development.
10.5. Policy 29 states that greenspace is required on site and that schemes will only be supported
where the required open space is provided. However, this is inconsistent with Policy 66 and
67 which states that contributions will be sought and that viability assessments will be
considered on a site specific approach stating that “the Council will take a pragmatic and
flexible approach to planning obligations”.
10.6. Flexibility therefore needs to be incorporated into Policy 29, in particular part A and B which
reflects Policy 66 and 67. The Local Plan at present is internally inconsistent and could
undermine the delivery of housing.
10.7. The Plan is its present form is not justified and is not consistent with national policy. It
is considered that the Plan could fail to deliver sustainable development in accordance with
the policies in the Framework.
10.8. In these circumstances, we do not consider the Doncaster Local Plan, in its
current form, to be sound.
10.9. However, we consider that with increased flexibility in line with policy 66 and 67 the Local
Plan can be found sound. Firsure will continue to work with the Council to develop
appropriate modifications to the Local Plan.
Proposed Change
10.10. To overcome the objection and address soundness matters, the Council should:
• Amend Policy 29 Parts A and B, and the associated explanatory text, specifically
paragraphs 10.22 and 10.25, to include flexibility and encourage rather than require;
and
• Reduce the level of commuted sum required so that it is consistent with the
requirements of the Framework.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
51
11. Policy 46: Housing Design Standards 11.1. Firsure is concerned with Policy 46 and consider that the Policy 46 is unsound.
Test of Soundness
11.2. Firsure considers that the Doncaster Local Plan – Publication Version 2015-2035 is unsound.
Which test of soundness are comments about?
X Positively Prepared X Effective
X Justified X Consistency with National Policy
Justification
11.3. Firsure is concerned that part A of this policy is seeking to implement national space
standards without the requisite justification and evidence.
11.4. This policy looks for development to meet national spaces standards as a minimum (for
residential). The enhanced standards, as introduced by Government, are intended to be
optional and can only be introduced where there is a clear need and they retain development
viability. As such they were introduced on a ‘need to have’ rather than a ‘nice to have’ basis.
11.5. PPG (ID 56-020) identifies the type of evidence required to introduce such a policy. It states
that ‘where a need for internal space standards is identified, local planning authorities should
provide justification for requiring internal space policies. Local planning authorities should take
account of the following areas.
11.6. Need – evidence should be provided on the size and type of dwellings currently being built in
the area, to ensure the impacts of adopting space standards can be properly assessed, for
example, to consider any potential impact on meeting demand for starter homes.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
52
11.7. Viability – the impact of adopting the space standard should be considered as part of a plan’s
viability assessment with account taken of the impact of potentially larger dwellings on land
supply. Local planning authorities will also need to consider impacts on affordability where a
space standard is to be adopted.
11.8. Timing – there may need to be a reasonable transitional period following adoption of a new
policy on space standards to enable developers to factor the cost of space standards into
future land acquisitions’.
11.9. Firsure welcomes the provision of new evidence on Housing Design Standards Policy. Firsure
consider that standards can, in some instances, have a negative impact upon viability, increase
affordability issues and reduce customer choice. In terms of choice some developers will
provide entry level two, three and four-bedroom properties which may not meet the optional
nationally described space standards but are required to ensure that those on lower incomes
can afford a property which has their required number of bedrooms. The housebuilding
industry knows its customers what type and size of housing is in demand. The use of Nationally
Described Space Standards, can therefore impact on the delivery of affordable products, and
can serve to stifle innovative design.
11.10. On NDSS Firsure would encourage the Council to recognise the larger land take such houses
will require more land take. Therefore to deliver this would reduce the yield of sites and could
have potential implications on the site yields identified by the Council on identified and
allocated sites, ultimately resulting in the Council failing to meet their housing targets.
11.11. Firsure note that the viability assessment has applied an average house size which is stated to
reflect NDSS, However Firsure note that the mix tested does not reflect the Policy 8
requirement. Further the viability demonstrates that site typologies in low value areas are
unviable based on the base assumptions, and viability is worsened with addition of other
planning requirements of the Local Plan, and in some circumstances some typologies in
medium value areas were demonstrated to be unviable. The 23% affordable housing
requirement has not been tested in combination with all the requirements of Policy 46, Firsure
consider that there needs to be greater flexibility in Policy 46 with regards to the use of NDSS.
11.12. Firsure is also concerned that part B of this policy states that 65% of all new homes on
housing developments of 10 or more units should be built to Part M4(2) of the Building
Regulations i.e. accessible and adaptable dwellings. This is a significant increase in the
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
53
requirement expressed in the earlier draft which required 30% of all housing to meet the
standards of Building regulation requirement M4 (2).
11.13. Firsure is generally supportive of providing homes for older and disabled persons. However,
if the Council wishes to adopt the higher optional standards for accessible and adaptable
homes the Council should only do so by applying the criteria set out in the PPG. The SHMA,
Economic Forecasts and Housing Needs Assessment and subsequent Housing Design
Standards Policy Evidence paper unfortunately does not provide sufficient evidence and does
not justify the Council’s position identified in the policy. The Housing Needs Assessment 2019,
whilst referred to in the background paper and Local Plan was not available at the time of
writing. Firsure reserve the right to comment further when this is made available.
11.14. It is important that if the Council are seeking the higher optional standards that the evidence
is forthcoming. PPG (ID 56-07) identifies the type of evidence required to introduce such a
policy, including the likely future need; the size, location, type and quality of dwellings needed;
the accessibility and adaptability of the existing stock; how the needs vary across different
housing tenures; and the overall viability.
11.15. The Written Ministerial Statement dated 25th March 2015 stated that:
11.16. The optional new national technical standards should only be required through any new Local Plan
policies if they address a clearly evidenced need, and where their impact on viability has been
considered, in accordance with the NPPG.
11.17. NPPG states that where a local planning authority adopts a policy to provide enhanced
accessibility or adaptability they should do so only by reference to requirement M4(2) and /
or M4(3) of the optional requirements in the Building Regulations and should not impose any
additional information requirements (for instance provision of furnished layouts) or seek to
determine compliance with these requirements, which is the role of the Building Control
Body. This is to ensure that all parties have the clarity and certainty of knowing which
standards they have to deal with and can factor these into their plans. For developers, this
ensures that the design and procurement complications that previously arose from a series of
different standards in different areas are avoided. It was recognised that it was not appropriate
to apply Category 2 or 3 standards to all new homes as not all people who buy or move in to
new homes need or wish to have such provision. Category 2 and 3 standards were therefore
made “optional” with the position being that the case for requiring such standards in future
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
54
new homes should be made through the adoption of local plan policies that have properly
assessed the level of requirement for these standards in the local area, also taking into account
other relevant factors including the impact on project viability.
11.18. Firsure does not dispute the population is ageing. However, it is unclear how this ageing
population and potential future need reflects in the need for 65 percent of all new homes on
sites of 10 or more dwellings to be provided at M4(2) standards. The optional higher M4(2)
standard should only be introduced on a “need to have” rather than a “nice to have” basis.
Although there is evidence of an ageing population having regard to the PPG this does not
amount to the justification required for the Council to include the optional standard as
specified in Policy 46.
11.19. The Councils housing Design Standards Policy Evidence Paper evidences the ageing population,
indicating that the percentage of over 65’s grows from 18.7% to 25%, Not all people over 65
will require a new home or adapted home. Indeed the paper recognises this in paragraph 2.53
where it states “not all of this demand will be met through new builds, and existing stock will
play some part”. The paper notes considers the level of people with Limiting Long Term
Illnesses or Disabilities and expects just less than 40% of households will have a person with
a long term health problem or disability, the majority of people with a long term health
problem or disability are over 65 (60%). Thus there is not sufficient evidence to support a
requirement of 65% based on evidence of need.
11.20. It is important that the Council recognises the viability implications of requiring all houses to
meet these enhanced standards. The whole plan viability evidence notes that all typologies in
low value areas are unviable before the consideration of the impact of M4(2) and M4(3)
standards, It also demonstrates that the application of M4(2) and M4(3) some typologies are
unviable in medium value areas, when tested against a base assumption for affordable housing
of 15% and not 23% as sought through Policy 8, Therefore, Firsure consider that this could
result in stalled development where time is taken to debate viability issues. The Council must
be mindful that it is unrealistic to negotiate every site on a one by one basis because the base-
line aspiration of a policy or combination of policies is set too high as this will jeopardise future
housing delivery. Firsure would urge the Council to reduce the percentage requirements to
ensure the deliverability of any policy. The policy must not be set at such a scale that will
threaten development to be in line with the Framework and guidance established in PPG.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
55
11.21. Firsure consider that the requirements in Policy 46 are not justified and does not provide
an appropriate strategy. The Plan is its present form could fail to deliver sustainable
development in accordance with the policies in the Framework and is not consistent with
national policy.
11.22. In these circumstances, we do not consider the Doncaster Local Plan, in its
current form, to be sound.
11.23. However, Firsure consider that with increased flexibility in Part A in relation to NDSS, and a
reduction of the target in part B to reflect evidence on need the Local Plan can be found
sound. Firsure will continue to work with the Council to develop appropriate modifications
to the Local Plan.
Proposed Change
11.24. To overcome the objection and address soundness matters, the Council should:
• Remove or increase the flexibility in part A of the policy which refers to national
space standards
• Remove or significantly reduce the requirement in Part B of the policy which requires
65% of all new homes to be accessible and adaptable.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
56
12. Policy 66: Developer Contributions 12.1. Firsure is concerned with aspects of Policy 66.
Test of Soundness
12.2. Firsure considers that the Local Plan is unsound.
Which test of soundness are comments about?
X Positively Prepared X Effective
X Justified X Consistency with National Policy
Justification
12.3. Firsure is supportive of the need for developer contributions. The Framework is, however,
clear that the derivation of developer contributions must not only take account of need but
also viability. Paragraph 34 of the Framework (2019) established the importance of viability
to ensure that development identified in the Plan should not be subject to such scale of
obligations and policy burden that their ability to be delivered might be threatened.
12.4. Appendices 3-10 of the Viability Report show the issues of viability for a number of sites. It
shows that the schemes in the low value areas were not able to support provision of 15%
affordable housing. In some circumstances some site typologies in the medium value areas
would also be unviable. The whole plan viability report concluded that generally schemes in
high and medium value areas were demonstrated to be viable. However, it should be noted
that this did not consider the cumulative/in combination impact of all of the policy
requirements and assessed other Plan requirements against the delivery of 15% affordable
housing and not 23% affordable housing as sought by Policy 8.
12.5. Firsure is concerned that with all the policy requirements the Local Plan details this could
undermine the delivery of housing through the need for a viability assessment of schemes on
a regular basis. The viability assessment shows that a significant proportion of sites will not
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
57
be able to achieve affordable housing due to viability matters. The Government is keen to
avoid such a situation where viability assessments are being submitted regularly to vary
planning policy obligations. The Council must be aware of the impact that viability assessments
and subsequent negotiation of obligations can have on the delivery of development. This could
impact on the delivery of the housing target. Instead, the Council should ensure this policy is
well tested to ensure the sites identified and allocated are deliverable.
12.6. The Council should be mindful that it is unrealistic to negotiate every site on a one by one
basis because the base-line aspiration of a policy or combination of policies is set too high as
this will jeopardise future housing delivery. Therefore, site by site negotiations on these sites
should occur occasionally rather than routinely.
12.7. Firsure are concerned that the policy requirements of the Plan are not justified and are not
consistent with the Framework.
12.8. In these circumstances, we do not consider the Doncaster Local Plan, in its
current form, to be sound.
Proposed Change
12.9. To overcome the objection and address soundness matters, the Council should:
• Review and update the viability assessment and modify the policy requirements to
reflect the findings and representations contained herein.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
58
13. Policy 67: Development Viability 13.1. Firsure is concerned with aspects of Policy 67.
Test of Soundness
13.2. Firsure considers that the Local Plan is unsound.
Which test of soundness are comments about?
X Positively Prepared X Effective
X Justified X Consistency with National Policy
Justification
13.3. Firsure is supportive of the need for developer contributions. The Framework is, however,
clear that the derivation of developer contributions must not only take account of need but
also viability. Paragraph 34 of the Framework (2018) established the importance of viability
to ensure that development identified in the Plan should not be subject to such scale of
obligations and policy burden that their ability to be delivered might be threatened.
13.4. Appendices 3-10 of the Viability Report (2019) show the issues of viability for a number of
sites. It shows that the schemes in the low value areas were not able to support 15% affordable
housing, prior to consideration of other policy requirements. In some circumstances schemes
in the medium value areas would also struggle to provide the 15 percent required by this
policy, when other policy requirements were considered. It should be noted that the Policy 8
requirement for affordable housing is 23% for high and medium value areas.
13.5. Firsure is concerned that with all the policy requirements the Local Plan details this could
undermine the delivery of housing through the need for a viability assessment of schemes on
a regular basis. The viability assessment shows that a significant proportion of sites will not
be able to achieve affordable housing due to viability matters. The Government is keen to
avoid such a situation where viability assessments are being submitted regularly to vary
planning policy obligations. The Council must be aware of the impact that viability assessments
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
59
and subsequent negotiation of obligations can have on the delivery of development. This could
impact on the delivery of the housing target. Instead, the Council should ensure this policy is
well tested to ensure the sites identified and allocated are deliverable.
13.6. The Council should be mindful that it is unrealistic to negotiate every site on a one by one
basis because the base-line aspiration of a policy or combination of policies is set too high as
this will jeopardise future housing delivery. Therefore, site by site negotiations on these sites
should occur occasionally rather than routinely.
13.7. Furthermore, Firsure considers that there may be some circumstances where this policy and
the use of trigger points in Part B can be utilised to bring forward the delivery of homes.
However, Firsure have significant concerns around the implementation of this policy and how
frequently it will be used. The use of trigger points could add further burdens to any developer
who will need to reproduce viability assessments at a potentially regular basis, going against
Government initiatives which are looking to reduce the need for viability assessments. Firsure
considers that this policy causes unnecessary uncertainty and additional risk for developers,
and therefore the policy could become an impediment to the development process and
compromise the deliverability of large sites particularly those phased and implemented over
long time periods.
13.8. Firsure are concerned that the whole plan viability does not fully consider the in combination
impacts of the Plan requirements. It is also considered that Part B does not provide sufficient
certainty. Firsure considers that the Plan is not justified and are not consistent with the
Framework.
13.9. In these circumstances, we do not consider the Doncaster Local Plan, in its
current form, to be sound.
13.10. Firsure consider that with increased flexibility in the Plan requirements and review of the
viability assessment the Plan can be made sound. Firsure will continue to work with the
Council to develop appropriate modifications.
Proposed Change
13.11. To overcome the objection and address soundness matters, the Council should:
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
60
• Review and update the viability assessment.
• Provide clarity on Part B or remove.
Development Plan Representation – Doncaster Local Plan 2015-2035 Publication Version September 2019
61
Appendix 1: Regeneris Report
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
A Draft Report by Hatch Regeneris 18 September 2019
Spawforths
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
18 September 2019
www.hatchregeneris.com
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
Contents Page 1. Introduction 1
2. Policy and Methodological Context 2
3. The Economic Performance of Doncaster 7
4. Our View of Need in Doncaster 10
Evidence base for current housing policy 10
Alternative assessments of housing need in Doncaster 11
What explains the difference between the assessments of need? 11
Conclusions 17
5. Summary of Key Points 19
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
1
1. Introduction 1.1 Doncaster Council is consulting on the Publication Version of its Local Plan which will
shape development in the borough between 2015 and 2035. Policy 3 of the Draft Plan states that at least 920 (net) new homes per annum will be delivered over the plan period (18,400 homes in total).
1.2 Hatch Regeneris has been appointed by Spawforths, on behalf of a consortia of housebuilders, developers and landowners to review the available evidence and provide advice on whether this level of provision will be sufficient to meet the needs of the future population and economy of Doncaster.
1.3 Hatch Regeneris are experts in assessing housing need and have prepared NPPF/PPG compliant evidence in over 50 local authority areas in England.
1.4 The report is structured as follows:
• Section 2 reviews the current planning policy and guidance which sets out how housing need should be assessed
• Section 3 reviews the recent economic performance of Doncaster to understand the potential for future growth.
• Section 4 reviews recent housing need assessments undertaken for Doncaster and provides our conclusions on the level of housing required to support economic growth.
• Section 5 summarises the key findings and conclusions.
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
2
2. Policy and Methodological Context • Government is committed to delivering more housing and delivering economic growth.
This is made clear in NPPF and in numerous other policy statements.
• Rebalancing the UK economy is another central objective of government policy. Growing the economic prosperity of the North of England is a primary policy goal.
• The revised NPPF and PPG has set out a standard method for determining the minimum level of housing that local planning authorities need to deliver. This removes the requirement to align housing policies with the future economic growth of an area. LPAs can still make an upward adjustment to support growth although this will now be discretionary.
• Criticism of the new approach centres on the risk it will “lock” areas into a cycle of low inward migration and low housing delivery. There are also concerns that the standard method will work against the aim of narrowing the north-south divide by under-providing the housing required to support growth in northern economies.
Planning Policy
2.1 The revised National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was published in February 2019. This retains the three overarching objectives contributing to sustainable development from earlier versions; building a strong, responsive and competitive economy, supporting strong, vibrant and healthy communities and protecting and enhancing the environment.
2.2 The revised framework also retains the explicit and unambiguous target to significantly boost the supply of housing (para 59) but introduces a new standard method for determining the minimum number of homes needed in local areas (see below). The framework continues to highlight the importance that local planning authorities adopt policies which support economic growth in their area, stating “Significant weight should be placed on the need to support economic growth and productivity, taking into account both local business needs and wider opportunities for development” (para 80). It also states that planning policies should “seek to address potential barriers to investment, such as inadequate infrastructure, services or housing, or a poor environment” (para 81).
Addressing the North-South Divide
2.3 The UK Government has also stated its intentions to address regional imbalances in the UK economy. The 2018 Industrial Strategy White Paper recognised that regional disparities in the UK are wider than in other western European nations and states that “many places are not reaching their full potential”. The strategy contains many measures orientated towards addressing regional disparities across broad areas like skills, transport and research and development.
2.4 The Government’s commitment to rebalancing the UK economy has been seen in policy measures, such as the establishment and strengthening of Metro Mayors across city regions, the opening of regional transport bodies like Transport for the North to link regional transport priorities with economic ones and committing funds, such as the £400m Northern Powerhouse Investment Fund.
2.5 The Northern Powerhouse Strategy was published in 2016. This set out the Government’s intention to continue developing the Northern Powerhouse. It outlines the Government's strategy to tackle productivity barriers and realise the full economic potential of the North
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
3
of England, including investment in transport infrastructure, measures to raise skill levels and ensure the North is an excellent place to start a business.
2.6 In 2019, the new Prime Minister Boris Johnson showed his continued commitment to the Northern Powerhouse by confirming the Government will fund a new high speed, trans-Pennine rail line between Manchester and Leeds.
How should housing need be calculated?
2.7 As stated above, the new NPPF introduces a new simplified method for determining the minimum level of housing needed in an area, which replaces the previous method.
The previous method
2.8 Under the earlier planning framework and guidance, the objectively assessed need for housing was calculated using a three step process:
• Establish the demographic starting point: plan-makers needed to use the latest available household projections to establish the baseline level of housing need. They could then make adjustments specific to their local circumstances based on alternative assumptions about demographic projections and household formation.
• Consider whether an uplift was required to support employment growth: an adjustment to the starting point should be considered to ensure that sufficient housing is provided to meet the needs of the economy. This was based on an assessment of the projected labour supply compared to future jobs growth.
• Consider whether an uplift is required to address market signals: a further adjustment should be applied if there is evidence of an imbalance between the demand for and supply of housing. Relevant indicators include house prices, rents affordability and overcrowding.
The new standard method
2.9 The new standard method for calculating local authorities’ housing need is based on a simple formula. This involves the following steps:
• Step 1: Setting the baseline: the 2014 based household projections continue to be used as the demographic baseline for each local authority area1. This should be based on the average annual household growth over a 10 year period.
• Step 2: An adjustment to take account of affordability: the baseline should be adjusted using a formula based on the affordability ratio (the ratio of median house prices to median earnings). For each 1 per cent increase in the affordability ratio above four, this would result in a quarter of a per cent increase in need above projected household growth.
1 Although more recent projections have now been published (the 2016 based projections prepared by ONS), these
pointed to a much lower level of housing need across the UK. The revised PPG therefore states that “the 2014-based household projections are used within the standard method to provide stability for planning authorities and communities, ensure that historic under-delivery and declining affordability are reflected, and to be consistent with the Government’s objective of significantly boosting the supply of homes”.
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
4
• Step 3: Capping the level of any increase: the standard method caps the level of any increase at 40%. For those authorities that have adopted their plan in the last five years, this cap is applied to the annual requirement figure in the local plan. For those that do not have an up-to-date local plan it is capped at 40% above whichever is higher of the projected household growth for their area over the plan period, or the annual housing requirement figure set out in their local plan.
2.10 The main change to the previous method is that local plan makers are no longer compelled to align their housing need figure with anticipated jobs growth. This would now be a discretionary policy decision for the local planning authority: “the standard method for assessing local housing need provides the minimum starting point in determining the number of homes needed in an area. It does not attempt to predict the impact that future government policies, changing economic circumstances or other factors might have on demographic behaviour. Therefore there will be circumstances where actual housing need may be higher than the figure identified by the standard method.” (paragraph 10).
2.11 Based on the standard method, the minimum housing need for Doncaster is 563 dpa. Although Doncaster is free to set a higher number which may be based on expected future jobs growth.
Response from Housebuilding Industry
2.12 Since the standard method was first proposed, a number of stakeholders from the planning or housebuilding industry have raised concerns about the changes. The key points are summarised below.
Removing the link between housing need and economic growth could stifle growth in some areas and widen regional disparities in economic performance
2.13 The main concern amongst stakeholders from the development industry was that removing the need to consider future jobs growth from the housing need assessment will result in housing policies that constrain economic growth. This is a particular risk in large areas of the north of England and the midlands where housing is more affordable than London and the south east, but which face major labour market challenges as a result of an ageing population.
2.14 In these areas, new housing is needed to address labour shortages, regenerate former industrial areas and to support the Government’s aspirations to rebalance the economy away from the overheating south east. A number of responses raised concerns that the standard method will work against these aims:
• “the failure of the methodology to factor economic growth into Objectively Assessed Needs calculations subsequently leads to a significant suppression of housing growth across the North of England which would stifle current economic growth” – Johnson & Mowat on behalf of the Leeds City Region Developers Consortium
• “the proposed methodology is inconsistent with the Government’s aim to boost growth in the Northern Powerhouse and Midlands Growth Engine, stifling growth in these areas.” – Bidwells
• “the draft methodology… will boost the housing requirement in the South and East, while depressing it in the North. We believe this contradicts wider economic policies such as the industrial strategy and Northern Powerhouse which aim to rebalance the UK economy”. – Northern Housing Consortium
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
5
• “the outcome of the new approach will be additional housing growth pressure on London and the greater south east, and continuing limitations on the contribution that housing growth could make to rebalancing England’s economy” – Regeneris
• “We believe that if the methodology is introduced in its current form it could seriously damage some areas of the UK, especially northern cities such as Leeds and Manchester… In order for the methodology to work outside of London there needs
to be some level of account taken for future growth projections” – British Property Federation
• “There is the possibility that growth objectives of many northern towns and cities will be undermined, with implications for the Northern Powerhouse”. Indigo Planning
• “There are flaws that, if left unchecked, could lead to less housing being built in some areas and a widening of the North-South divide – the opposite of the Government’s intentions. Unless authorities are progressive in their thinking and understand the link between housing and the economy, the methodology could have dire consequences, not only for economic growth but also their regeneration ambitions and affordability” – White Young Green (WYG)
• “Action will need to be taken to ensure that the relatively lower levels of need in the north of England do not undermine future economic well-being” - Lichfields
There is a risk of carrying forward past constraints
2.15 Household forecasts are based on recent population trends and household formation rates which are both influenced by past rates of housing delivery, affordability and economic trends. By relying on the 2014 based household projections for the demographic baseline, there is therefore a risk that past underperformance caused by economic conditions or a failure to meet housing targets are projected forward under the new method.
2.16 This leads the BPF to warn that the methodology risks “locking in recessionary trends
across much of the north and Midlands”. WYG state: “It fails to recognise that areas that have previously delivered low levels of housing growth will effectively be given a mandate to continue doing so. Similarly, areas of higher growth are more likely to see a continuation of this trend. This is because, as recognised in the PPG, the household projections are based on past demographic trends and household formation rates. If migration has been constrained by supply, this constraint will be projected into the future. The uplift is unlikely to adequately compensate for this”.
There is a risk that housing and employment land policies are not joined up
2.17 The previous approach set out in PPG encouraged plan makers to consider housing and economic development needs alongside one another and to use consistent assumptions about jobs growth.
2.18 In contrast the proposed approach, which no longer requires any consideration of economic trends, means some councils may adopt housing and economic development policies which are inconsistent or in direct conflict with one another. The BPF argue that “this undermines a plan-led approach whereby you plan to meet housing and economic needs together, rather than planning for one and letting the other fall behind”.
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
6
Implications for this review
2.19 The standard method provides the statutory methodology for determining the minimum level of housing that Doncaster should provide over the plan period. This is calculated as being 563 dpa. This review does not question this figure.
2.20 However, as stated above, Doncaster is free to identify a higher number to support economic growth. The focus of this review is on identifying what this higher number should be. Although this is no longer a statutory requirement, it is still important that Doncaster’s housing target is aligned with other policies to support economic growth in the draft Local Plan (eg its employment land provision) and that it addresses some of the potential barriers to future growth, such as its ageing population.
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
7
3. The Economic Performance of Doncaster • Doncaster has the fastest growing economy in Yorkshire and Humber and one of the
fastest growing in the north of England. The district has created around 24,000 jobs between 2000 and 2017, representing a growth rate of 1.1% p.a.
• Doncaster’s key asset is its connectivity by road, rail and air which has made it a highly attractive location for inward investment, particularly for industrial and logistics occupiers, with over 1.2m sq m of industrial/warehouse space taken up since 2010.
• The strong performance is also due to a significant improvement in key economic indicators, including skills and rates of enterprise. The business start-up rate has more than doubled since 2010 and is now in line with the national average. These improvements have removed a key barrier to growth and mean that Doncaster is well placed to continue its high rate of growth.
• The draft Local Plan has set a target of delivering 481 hectares of employment land between 2015 and 2035 and the 2018 ELR and 2019 update shows there continues to be very strong market demand for industrial space in Doncaster. There is therefore strong potential for Doncaster to accommodate high levels of inward investment in future which would also drive jobs growth.
3.1 Doncaster is one of the fastest growing economies in the north of England. Real Gross Value Added (GVA)2 increased at a rate of 2.5% p.a. between 2000 and 2017, which is significantly higher than the national and regional average (1.7% p.a. and 1.4% p.a. respectively) and higher than any other district in Yorkshire and Humber (see Figure 3.1).
Figure 3.1 Annual average growth rate in Gross Value Added for local authorities in Yorkshire and Humber (2000 to 2017, 2016 prices)
Source Nominal and real regional gross value added (balanced) by industry, Office for National Statistics
2 GVA is the measure of the value of goods and services produced in an area, industry or sector of an economy
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
8
3.2 This growth has driven increased demand for labour in Doncaster, creating around 24,000 new jobs between 2000 and 2017. Figure 3.1 shows that the rate of jobs growth in Doncaster has matched the national average and outperformed the average for Y&H. This has been driven by a number of sectors including logistics, retail, professional and business services and the public sector.
Figure 3.2 Employment change index, 2000-2017 (2000=100)
Source Jobs density data, Nomis
3.3 Table 3.1 shows how this translates to average annual growth rates over different time periods. Over each time period, Doncaster has achieved a minimum annual growth rate of 0.8% p.a. Average annual growth was lower over the ten-year period because it is skewed by the economic downturn which occurred between 2008 and 2011.
Table 3.1 Jobs growth rates over different time periods Doncaster Y&H GB
5 year (2012-2017) 2.8% 2.1% 2.1% 10 year (2007-2017) 0.8% 0.8% 1.2% 15 year (2007-2017) 1.1% 0.8% 1.1% Source: Jobs density data, Nomis
3.4 Doncaster’s strong performance has been driven by a number of factors. The borough has excellent connectivity across a number of modes of transport, including road, rail and air, which has made it a highly attractive location for inward investment.
3.5 Doncaster has also been extremely successful in addressing some of the challenges which have acted as a constraint on growth in the past. Figure 3.2 shows how the business start-up rate, measuring levels of enterprise in Doncaster, has risen from four new businesses per 1,000 working age people in 2010 to over 10 businesses in 2016. Doncaster’s residents now display levels of enterprise in line with the national average and well above the average for Yorkshire. Doncaster has also seen a significant improvement in the skills
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
9
of its workforce, particularly among younger residents. The Annual Population Survey shows that the proportion of people with no qualifications (a key barrier to growth) fell from over 15% in 2010 to just 9% in 2018, bringing it in line with the average for Yorkshire and much closer to the national average.
Figure 3.3 Business start up rate, 2010-2016
Source ONS Business Demography and mid-year population estimates
3.6 The strong performance of Doncaster is due in part to the actions taken as part of the Doncaster Economic Growth Plan. This outlined a number of measures to promote new business and improve skills. Policies to support start-ups included access to start-up advisors and mentors with established local businesses. Skills measures included an apprenticeships programme and improved careers advice and guidance.
3.7 The improvement in its skills and business base led to Doncaster being recognised as one of the fastest improving cities in PWC’s Good Growth for Cities Index. As key drivers of productivity and economic performance these improvements have also addressed barriers to growth and positioned Doncaster to achieve high levels of growth in the future.
3.8 The Economic Growth Plan also outlined measures to increase inward investment by improving response times to planning decisions and increasing the stock of modern industrial and office premises. Analysis of take-up of new business floorspace shows that Doncaster is a highly attractive location for investors, particularly for industrial and distribution occupiers. Over 1.2m sq m of industrial space has been taken up since 2010, representing 37% of gross take-up in South Yorkshire (despite only accounting for 20% of its population). This is therefore a key source of competitive advantage for Doncaster.
3.9 The draft Local Plan seeks to build on this competitive advantage by setting a target of delivering 481 hectares of employment land over the plan period (2015 to 2035). The 2018 Employment Land Review and 2019 update also provide market evidence that new industrial and logistics space is in high demand and viable to deliver.
3.10 In summary, there are a number of grounds to be optimistic for the future growth of Doncaster. The district’s strong record of jobs growth, significant improvement in key economic indicators and large supply of high quality sites for inward investment all mean Doncaster is well positioned to achieve high levels of growth over the plan period
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
10
4. Our View of Need in Doncaster • The Publication Local Plan sets a target of delivering 920 dpa between 2015 and 2032.
The target delivers the minimum level of housing need for Doncaster based on the standard method (585 dpa) and makes an upward adjustment to support economic growth.
• The upward adjustment was based on evidence produced by PBA which recommended housing need is presented as a range between 585 dpa (the minimum) and 912 dpa. The upper limit was based on matching the jobs growth aspirations of the Sheffield City Region LEP (1,420 jobs per annum) over the period 2016 to 2026. The Council has adopted a figure slightly above this range.
• Lichfields has produced an alternative assessment of housing need as part of a planning appeal in Doncaster. This assumes a lower rate of jobs growth (741 to 1,182 jobs per annum) but arrives at a much higher level of housing need (1,370 dpa).
• We conclude that PBA has made unjustified and unrealistic assumptions for a number of factors which all suppress the level of housing required to support future employment growth. In particular, we disagree with their assumptions about commuting, double jobbing and household formation rates.
• We also disagree with a number of the assumptions made by Lichfields and conclude that they overestimate the housing needed to support the level of growth in their scenarios.
• We conclude that Doncaster would need to deliver between 1,000 and 1,100 dpa between 2015 and 2032 to support future economic growth. This is based on our review of the assumptions made in the two reports and our professional judgement but would need to be tested through a detailed modelling exercise.
• In summary, the housing target of 920 dpa meets the minimum level of housing required as set out in the standard method but would risk constraining the future economic growth of Doncaster. For this reason we strongly recommend that the Council considers making a further upward adjustment.
Evidence base for current housing policy 4.1 The housing target of 920 dpa is based on evidence produced by Peter Brett Associates
(PBA) in its report Economic Forecasts and Housing Needs Assessment (June 2018). This report presents a number of demographic and economy-led scenarios to estimate the housing required in Doncaster over the plan period. This assessment drew heavily on economic modelling and assumptions developed by Experian in their local economic forecasting model. We therefore refer to this assessment as the PBA/Experian report.
4.2 The report recommends housing need is presented as a range between 585 dpa and 912 dpa (the Council has adopted a figure slightly above this range). This is based on the following:
• 585 dpa is the minimum level of housing required in Doncaster based on the standard method. This is based on the 2014 household projections (using the 2016 based projections reduces this to 572).
• 912 dpa is the level of housing that PBA estimate is required to meet the jobs growth aspirations of the Sheffield City Region. This is based on the period 2016 to 2026,
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
11
which is different to the plan period (2015 to 2035) but aligns with the time period used in the standard method.
Alternative assessments of housing need in Doncaster
4.3 We have also reviewed an alternative assessment of housing need in Doncaster. This was based on the Proof of Evidence of Fiona Braithwaite (Lichfields) for a planning appeal in Doncaster on behalf of Faith Homes3. We refer to this as the Lichfields report. This assessment was undertaken in line with the previous methodology for objective assessments of need (ie prior to the introduction of the standard method). However the scope of this assessment was similar to the PBA/Experian report in that it sought to determine the level of housing required to support economic growth in Doncaster.
4.4 The assessment tested a wide range of different demographic and economic scenarios to determine housing need. It concluded that a range of 1,200 dpa to 1,541 dpa “provides the most reliable indicator of future housing need within Doncaster” over the period 2015 to 2032. It therefore arrived at a range where the minimum level of need was some 288 dpa higher than the maximum identified by PBA over the same time period.
What explains the difference between the assessments of need?
4.5 We have critically reviewed both of the reports and their underpinning assumptions to understand the reasons why their estimates of housing need are so different. We use this analysis to reach conclusions on the level of housing required to support future jobs growth in Doncaster. This section looks at each of the key assumptions in turn.
Jobs growth assumptions
4.6 PBA/Experian run two jobs-led scenarios:
• Experian Baseline (Dec 2017): based on average growth of 830 jobs per annum
• Policy led: this assumes average growth of 1,420 jobs per annum and is based on the jobs growth targets in the emerging Strategic Economic Plan (SEP) for the Sheffield City Region (SCR).
4.7 PBA conclude that the policy-led scenario should not be used to calculate the objectively assessed need under the previous planning framework and guidance. This is because “the OAN should be based on a realistic expectation of future jobs rather than aspiration, and the Guidance specifies that the aspirations of Strategic Economic Plans should not be treated as part of the development plan”. It goes on to state that “the policy led scenario is recognised as ambitious and hence the jobs growth and housing demand that it predicts may not materialise” and recommends that the Council adopt a lower number, halfway between the baseline and policy-led scenarios.
4.8 Lichfields run a large number of jobs-led scenarios but the preferred scenarios (those used to identify the OAN) are:
• Experian Baseline (Jan 2017): based on average growth of 741 jobs per annum
3 Land off Westminster Drive, Dunsville, Doncaster. Prrof of Evidence of Fiona Braithwaite Planning Inspectorate No.
Appeal AAP/F4410/W/16/3158500
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
12
• Policy led: this assumes average growth of 1,182 jobs per annum. This is also based on SCR’s jobs growth target, however it is based on an earlier target to PBA/Experian’s policy-led scenario.
4.9 This means that PBA/Experian assume a higher level of jobs growth than Lichfields but arrive at a lower housing need figure. Therefore the jobs growth assumptions do not explain the large difference in the conclusions about the level of housing need.
4.10 While we agree with PBA that the objectively assessed need for housing should not be based on unfounded policy aspirations, we disagree that jobs growth of 1,420 jobs per annum is an unrealistic level of growth. This level of growth is based on employment growing at a rate of 1% p.a. which is in line with the long term average growth rate in Doncaster (see Table 3.1).
4.11 Furthermore, this rate of growth is consistent with the Local Plan target of delivering 481 hectares of employment land over the plan period 2015 to 2035. This target is based on Doncaster achieving a jobs growth rate of 1% p.a. over the plan period and the Local Plan states that this is a realistic and evidence based target: “It is considered therefore that there is sufficient previous evidence of investment, land development and analysis on (sic) the Doncaster Employment Land Review (2018) (Colliers) that enough land should be allocated for a 1% jobs growth”.
4.12 We therefore conclude that a growth rate of 1,420 jobs per annum represents a sound basis for planning housing. This is consistent with past trends and would ensure a greater alignment with the Council’s employment land policies.
Economic activity rates
4.13 The key factor explaining the difference between PBA’s and Lichfields’ assessment of housing need is their assumptions about economic activity rates; the proportion of Doncaster’s population who are either in work (employed) or seeking work (unemployed). The level of housing need is highly sensitive to the assumed change in economic activity rates in a jobs-led scenario because it determines what proportion of future jobs growth could be taken by local Doncaster residents. If the proportion of people who are economically active is flat or falling, then it implies that a larger share of future jobs growth will need to be taken by in-migrants, which increases demand for housing.
4.14 Lichfields and PBA have used different sources for their assumptions on future change in economic activity rates:
• Lichfields align their assumptions with the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR)’s 2017 projections of economic activity rates for the UK, which they then rebase to take in to account the current conditions in Doncaster. The same assumptions are applied in all of the jobs-led scenarios.
• PBA use the assumptions which are built in to Experian’s model for local economic forecasting. The assumptions made about economic activity are more dynamic in that they respond to changes in the economy (eg if demand for labour grows then economic activity rates increase in response)
4.15 When applied to the same 2014 based sub-national population projections, the two sets of assumptions result in two very different projections of future change in the labour supply. PBA/Experian forecast an increase of 5,000 resident workers, while Lichfields forecast a fall of 1,400. The difference between these two (6,400 workers) helps to explain why they arrive at such different conclusions about the need for housing. In Lichfields’ scenarios the shortfall of local workers means that Doncaster needs to attract in-migrants to support jobs growth.
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
13
Table 4.1 Projected Change in Labour Supply in Doncaster based on 2014 Sub-national Population Projections 2015 to 2032
2015 2032 Change Peter Brett Associates 148,200 153,200 +5,000 Lichfields 148,700 147,300 -1,400 PBA numbers from Table 2.1 in Economic Forecasts and Housing Needs Assessment, July 2018. Lichfields numbers from Land off Westminster Drive, Dunsville, Doncaster, Appendices to the Proof of Evidence of Fiona Braithwaite, Appendix 7: Modelling Outputs, Scenario A1: 2014 Baseline
4.16 The main difference between the two assessments relates to the assumptions made about the economic activity rates of 16 to 64 year olds
• Lichfields use the evidence from OBR to apply assumed change in economic activity rates for five year age groups. The net effect of these changes is a slight increase in the economic activity rate from 74.6% to 75.5%4.
• In contrast, PBA/Experian assume the economic activity rate for 16 to 64 year olds increases at a much faster rate. The scale of the increase is different in each of the scenarios but ranges from a 5.3 percentage point increase in the baseline demographic scenario (based on SNPP 2014) to 5.6 percentage points in the jobs-led scenario.
4.17 The scale of the increase is enough to offset Doncaster’s declining working age population and increase the size of the workforce over the plan period.
4.18 While we would normally support the assumptions used by Lichfields, analysis of recent data on economic activity rates show that PBA/Experian’s assumptions are justified. Although economic activity rates have fluctuated over time, the long term trend shows that economic activity rates have been increasing by around 0.4 percentage points per annum which is consistent with PBA’s assumptions.
Workers with more than one job
4.19 Neither the Lichfields nor the PBA/Experian reports explain their assumptions about the proportion of workers with more than one job. However this can have a significant effect on the level of housing need. If it is assumed that the proportion of workers with more than one job increases over time, it implies a smaller number of workers are required to support jobs growth than if the rate remains constant. This reduces the level of in-migration which in turn supresses the demand for housing.
4.20 Although PBA/Experian do not address the issue of “double jobbing” in their report, they do implicitly assume that the rate will increase from 3.6% to around 6% in each of their scenarios based on the ratio of ‘Workplace Jobs’ to ‘Workplace based Employment’. This has a significant effect on the number of people required to fill jobs; if they assumed that the rate remains constant then Doncaster would need to find an additional 3,300 people in the baseline scenario and an additional 3,400 people in the policy-led scenario. Assuming that these additional people could not be attracted through increased in-commuting (since that would be depriving neighbouring areas of workers), the shortfall would need to be addressed by increased in-migration to Doncaster which would increase demand for housing.
4 This is approximate. The Lichfields assessment states that OBR 2017 rates have been used and rebased to Doncaster
using data from the Census and Annual Population Survey. However they do not present the calculations, the specific assumptions which have been applied for different age groups and genders in Doncaster or how this translates to an overall economic activity rate for 16 to 64 year olds. We have tried to recreate Lichfield’s calculations and arrived at a broadly similar result as them.
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
14
Table 4.2 PBA/Experian assumptions for double-jobbing 2015 Baseline
Scenario 2032 Policy-led
scenario 2032 Workforce Jobs 134,000 147,800 160,600 Workplace based Employment 129,300 139,400 151,600 % of workers with more than one job
3.6% 6.0% 5.9%
4.21 The source of PBA/Experian’s assumption on double jobbing is not clear, nor is it justified. APS data shows that around 3% of people in employment in Doncaster in 2015 had more than one job. However there is no evidence that this is increasing over time. Figure 4.2 shows the change in the double-jobbing rate for Doncaster and Yorkshire and Humber (this is included because the margins of error are much lower at regional level). This shows that the rate has fluctuated over time but has only risen above 3% on a small number of occasions. The data for Yorkshire is more consistent but shows that the double jobbing rate has consistently been between 3% and 4%. At no point has it got close to 6%.
Figure 4.1 Percentage of residents with more than one job
Source APS
4.22 Lichfields do not state their assumptions about double-jobbing. However it appears from their modelling outputs in Appendix 7 that they assume each new job will require one worker; effectively assuming a double jobbing rate of zero. This is also incorrect as the evidence above shows. A more reasonable assumption would be that the double jobbing rate is set at around 3% and then held constant for the duration of the plan period.
Commuting
4.23 The assumptions made about commuting can also have a significant effect on the estimated population and housing required to support future jobs growth. For example, if it is assumed that the net balance of out-commuters and in-commuters declines (sometimes referred to as “reclaiming commuters”), it means a larger number of new jobs can be filled from the local labour market, which reduces the need to attract in-migrants.
4.24 The two assessments for Doncaster make the following assumptions:
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
15
• Lichfields assume that the commuting ratio (the ratio of employed residents to workforce jobs located in Doncaster) remains constant throughout the plan period. They do not state what the ratio is, but based on the data sources used it appears they have assumed a ratio of 0.99. This would mean that Doncaster is a net importer of commuters although only by a very small margin.
• PBA/Experian use the assumptions built in to Experian’s local economic forecasting model. It is not explained how commuting is calculated, however we assume this is essentially a balancing item which goes up and down based on forecast demand and supply in Doncaster and neighbouring areas. Their model shows that Doncaster’s commuting balance is negative, indicating that more people commute out than commute in. This is the reverse of Lichfields’ assumption which is explained by the fact that Experian apply an additional assumption about double jobbing, which means the number of people working in Doncaster is lower than the number of jobs. In both of the scenarios it is assumed that the net outflow of commuters will fall, which means there are more workers available to fill jobs created in Doncaster.
4.25 These different assumptions provide another reason for the large differences between PBA’s and Lichfields’ housing need results. By making the assumption that Doncaster will reclaim commuters, the estimated number of additional people required to meet jobs growth is reduced. We estimate that if the commuting ratio was kept constant, Doncaster would need to find an additional 2,700 employed residents to fill jobs in the baseline scenario and an additional 3,200 employed residents in the policy led scenario.
4.26 PBA explain the change in commuting patterns by stating that “this results from the tightening labour market”. In other words local demand for labour increases relative to local supply. However, commuting patterns are not just dependent on labour market conditions in Doncaster. They also depend on conditions in neighbouring areas. The complex range of factors which could influence commuting patterns (eg demographic change, jobs growth etc in multiple areas) means it is very difficult to predict how they will change in future. By assuming that the net outflow from Doncaster reduces, the model is essentially depriving neighbouring areas of workers by reducing a source of labour supply.
4.27 Guidance issued by the Planning Advisory Service (drafted by PBA itself) warns against making these sorts of assumptions unless they have been agreed with the neighbouring authorities that it affects: ““Another risky approach is to plan for recalling commuters, so the ratio of workplace jobs to resident workers – and hence to population and number of dwellings – is assumed to rise over the plan period. Like increasing activity rates, this assumption means that more jobs can be accommodated for a given number of dwellings, or a given number of jobs needs fewer dwellings. But the expected shift in commuting should be believable, and acceptable to the other local authorities affected by it. Strategies of recalling commuters should not be adopted unilaterally; they require cross-boundary agreement in line with the Duty to Cooperate.”
4.28 PBA could argue that their assumptions about commuting are internally consistent with Experian’s local economic forecasting model and its calculations about the commuting balance between different authorities. However these assumptions have not been agreed with neighbouring authorities. In fact there is evidence that they are inconsistent with some neighbouring authorities’ assumptions about commuting in their own housing need assessments. For example in Barnsley, which shares strong commuting links with Doncaster5, the OAN assumed a reduction in out-commuting down to 2001 levels. PBA
5 The 2011 Census showed that around 3,100 residents of Barnsley commuted to work in Doncaster, making it the third
largest source of external labour for Doncaster (after Rotherham and Bassetlaw)
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
16
was highly critical of this assumption stating “setting aside the practicality of recalling these workers that are likely to be in employment elsewhere in the region, the approach is based on the notion that another Council must increase its housing by an equal number to offset this return of commuters to Barnsley”.
4.29 This means that the housing need models in two neighbouring authorities are both based on the assumption that they will be able to reclaim commuters. If this pattern was repeated across South Yorkshire, it would result in housing policies which cause an undersupply of labour relative to the needs of the economy. For this reason we believe the assumptions are unjustified.
Household Formation Rates
4.30 A further factor explaining the difference in results is in the assumptions made for household formation (the probability that a person of a given age/gender will form a household). Both Lichfields and PBA apply the household formation rates underpinning the 2014 based household projections developed by CLG. However Lichfields apply an additional sensitivity test which assumes that household formation rates for 15 to 34 year olds partially catch up to earlier household formations forecasts produced in 2008. The justification for this is that there is some evidence that household formation among younger age groups have been suppressed by the economic downturn, stricter lending requirements and the poor affordability of housing in some parts of the country. This adjustment increases the average housing requirement by between 60 and 80 dwellings per annum in the two “preferred” scenarios.
4.31 We believe an upward adjustment to household formation rates for younger people in Doncaster is justified. However we disagree with the method used by Lichfields which assumes a partial catch up to household formation rates used in the 2008 projections (now ten years out of date). A more reasonable adjustment would be that they continue on the trajectory forecast in the 2014 household projections between 2015 and 2024 rather than falling again after this date. By the end of the plan period this would mean the household formation rate is around 46.7% rather than 45.2%. We estimate this would increase the number of households by around 40 per annum in PBA’s baseline demographic scenario and 60 per annum in the policy-led scenario.
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
17
Figure 4.2 Household Formation Rates for 25 to 34 year olds
Source CLG 2014 Household Projections
Timescale
4.32 The final reason why we consider PBA’s housing need estimate to be too low to support economic growth is the time period used. Paragraph 4.29 of the report presents two estimates of housing need for the policy-led scenario based on different time periods:
• For the plan period 2015-32: 1,073 dpa
• For 2016-26, the assessment period used in the new standard method: 912 dpa. 4.33 They explain the main reason for the difference is that the gap between labour demand
(jobs growth) and labour supply (due to change in population and economic activity) gets larger over time. So the longer the forecast period the greater is the need to attract new workers to Doncaster.
4.34 PBA use the lower figure because it aligns with the ten year period used in the standard method. However there is no reason why these two should align. Given that the housing target will apply throughout the plan period adopting the lower figure risks labour supply becoming increasingly out of step with labour demand.
Conclusions 4.35 We have identified flaws in a number of assumptions used by PBA/Experian and Lichfields.
In the case of PBA/Experian, these have all suppressed the level of housing required to support future economic growth. We also disagree with a number of the assumptions made by Lichfields and conclude that they overestimate the housing needed to support the level of growth in their scenarios.
4.36 Based on the above, we conclude that Doncaster would need to deliver in the region of 1,100 dpa between 2015 and 2032 to support future economic growth. This lies between the two estimates made by PBA/Experian and Lichfields. This is based on our review of the assumptions made in the two reports and our professional judgement but would need to be tested through a detailed modelling exercise.
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
18
4.37 In summary, the housing target of 920 dpa meets the minimum level of housing required as set out in the standard method but would risk constraining the future economic growth of Doncaster. For this reason we strongly recommend that the Council considers making a further upward adjustment.
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
19
5. Summary of Key Points 5.1 Doncaster Borough Council is consulting on its Draft Local Plan which will shape
development in the borough between 2015 and 2032. Hatch Regeneris has been appointed by Spawforths, on behalf of a consortia of housebuilders, developers and landowners to review the available evidence and provide advice on whether this level of provision will be sufficient to meet the needs of the future population and economy of Doncaster.
Policy and methodological context
• The UK Government is committed to delivering more housing and delivering economic growth. This is made clear in NPPF and in numerous other policy statements.
• Rebalancing the UK economy is another central objective of government policy. Growing the economic prosperity of the North of England is a primary policy goal.
• The revised NPPF and PPG has set out a standard method for determining the minimum level of housing that local planning authorities need to deliver. This removes the requirement to align housing policies with the future economic growth of an area. LPAs can still make an upward adjustment to support growth although this will now be discretionary.
• Criticism of the new approach centres on the risk it will “lock” areas into a cycle of low inward migration and low housing delivery. There are also concerns that the standard method will work against the aim of narrowing the north-south divide by under-providing the housing required to support growth in northern economies.
• Applying the formula for the standard method in Doncaster would result in a housing requirement of 572 dpa.
The economic performance of Doncaster
• Doncaster has been one of the fastest growing economies in Yorkshire and Humber. The district has created around 24,000 jobs between 2000 and 2017, representing a growth rate of 1.1% p.a.
• Doncaster’s key asset is its connectivity by road, rail and air which has made it a highly attractive location for inward investment, particularly for industrial and logistics occupiers, with over 1.1m sq m of industrial/warehouse space taken up since 2010.
• The strong performance is also due to a significant improvement in key economic indicators, including skills and levels of enterprise. The business start-up rate has more than doubled since 2010 and is now in line with the national average. These improvements have removed a key barrier to growth and mean that Doncaster is well placed to continue its high rate of growth.
• The draft Local Plan has set a target of delivering 481 hectares of employment land between 2015 and 2035 and a number of ELRs shows there continues to be very strong market demand for industrial space in Doncaster. There is therefore strong potential for Doncaster to accommodate high levels of inward investment in future which would also drive jobs growth.
Review of Doncaster's Housing Requirement
20
Our view of need in Doncaster
• The draft Local Plan sets a target of delivering 920 dpa between 2015 and 2032. The target delivers the minimum level of housing need for Doncaster based on the standard method (585 dpa) and makes an upward adjustment to support economic growth.
• The upward adjustment was based on evidence produced by PBA which recommended housing need is presented as a range between 585 dpa (the minimum) and 912 dpa. The upper limit was based on matching the jobs growth aspirations of the Sheffield City Region LEP (1,420 jobs per annum) over the period 2016 to 2026. The Council has adopted a figure slightly above this range.
• Lichfields has produced an alternative assessment of housing need as part of a planning appeal in Doncaster. This assumes a lower rate of jobs growth than PBA (741 to 1,182 jobs per annum) but arrives at a much higher level of housing need (1,370 dpa).
• We conclude that PBA has made unjustified and unrealistic assumptions for a number of factors which all suppress the level of housing required to support future employment growth. In particular, we disagree with their assumptions about commuting, double jobbing and household formation rates.
• We also disagree with a number of the assumptions made by Lichfields and conclude that they overestimate the housing needed to support the level of growth in their scenarios.
• We conclude that Doncaster would need to deliver between around 1,100 dpa between 2015 and 2032 to support future economic growth. This is based on our review of the assumptions made in the two reports and our professional judgement but would need to be tested through a detailed modelling exercise.
• In summary, the housing target of 920 dpa meets the minimum level of housing required as set out in the standard method but would risk constraining the future economic growth of Doncaster. For this reason we strongly recommend that the Council considers making a further upward adjustment.
www.hatchregeneris.com London: Manchester:
The Role and Growth of RossingtonSTRIPE ROAD, ROSSINGTON
Growth in RossingtonStrategic Location Plan
Doncaster
Thorne
M180
M18A1(M)
A19
A638
New Edlington Rossington
Braithwell
Tickhill
Finningley
Doncaster Sheffield Airport
Conisborough
Denaby Main
SprotboroughWalton
Armthorpe
EdenthorpeRive
r Don
Rive
r D
un N
aviga
tion
Bentley
Adwick le Street
Carcroft
Askern
Hatfield
N
IntroductionSpawforths have prepared a review of the Role and Function of Rossington on behalf of Firsure Ltd. Further housing growth is required in Rossington to support its continued growth and regeneration. The land at Stripe Road, Rossington presents a deliverable solution to meet this requirement.
This document has been produced for the site at Stripe Road, Rossington.
The site is being advocated to Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council (DMBC) for inclusion within the Local Plan as a Housing Allocation. This document reviews the role and function of Rossington as a Sustainable Settlement and makes the case that further housing land should be allocated in this settlement.
The site is located to the south of Rossington in a triangle of land between existing housing areas and adjacent to the East Coast Mainline in an area currently designated as Green Belt. It is circa 18.5 Ha in area. The site is in an area on the southern edge of Rossington
Stripe Road is within 10 mins walk (800m) of the Gattison Lane Local Centres with good access to major bus routes.
The site is a protrusion of Green Belt within an existing residential area of Rossington.
The site is located 1 mile from the Great Yorkshire Way which provides access to the M18 (Junction 3) within approximately 10 minutes drive (3.8 miles).
The site is adjacent to existing housing to the north, east and west with the EastCoast Mainline separating the site from residential development to the east.
The site represents a highly sustainable development opportunity with access to existing facilities and services. It is a logical extension to the urban area of Rossington and supports the continued housing and economic growth of the Borough.
ObjectivesThe key objectives of the scheme are to:
Open up suitable Green Belt land for development
Support an attractive neighbourhood in Doncaster.
Provide new public open space and improve pedestrian and vehicular linkages.
Deliver in the region of 500 new homes to meet the needs of the Borough.
Support an attractive neighbourhood in Doncaster
ScopeThe scope of this document is to analyse the role and function of Rossington within the Borough in the context of significant local investment in infrastructure and strategic employment sites as well as the planned development of Doncaster Sheffield Airport. It will review the growth of Rossington and demonstrate that further land is required to support a growing population.
The document emphasises the opportunity presented by the land at Stripe Road, Rossington as a residential development and to seek its allocation as a housing site within the Local Plan. This is set in the context of the opportunity that the site provides to contribute towards delivering new housing for Doncaster and the economic growth aspirations for the wider Borough.
KEY
Flood Risk Zone
Proposed Development
Other Sites Considered
N500m0 1km
Stripe Road Sustainable
Development
Aerotropolis ‘Grand Plan’ residential
development relies on delivery of a
large scale projectProposed PGA Golf site will provide no
affordable homes
Allocated Parkland
879 - Allocated Employment
Colliery Scheme
Allocated Employment
70 dwellings is not large enough
J3
M18
Great Yorkshire Way
Growth in Rossington
A638
M18 Connection
Great Yorkshire Way
Rail Links
Yorkshire Wildlife ParkStrategic
Employment Site
Doncaster Park and Ride
Wider Context for Growth in Rossington
To achieve the growth that the Sheffield City Region (SCR) is seeking to achieve, and is securing Government funding for, the level of new housing needs to reflect the ambitions of the Strategic Economic Plan.
The Sheffield City Region Integrated Infrastructure Plan states: “A quality housing offer has a crucial role to play in the future economic growth of the City Region…It has been identified that between 70,000 and 100,000 additional homes are needed in SCR to support the proposed economic growth over the next 10 years. The new homes will have the dual benefit of providing accommodation that underpins the proposed increase in employment (70,000 jobs), as well as the wider economic benefits that housing investment brings.” The plan goes on to state that to prevent displacement: “The type and location of construction may be important in mitigating losses of households from the city region that might otherwise occur.”
Within this context it is important that Doncaster Council plans for new jobs and associated new homes in accordance with the Strategic Economic Plan growth aspirations.
The Local Plan should focus more growth and regeneration on the main towns. This growth should be of an appropriate type and scale to meet the economic needs and aspirations of the main towns.
Rossington should be identified as an area for growth, due to regionally
significant levels of inward investment in this location. A housing target for Rossington of between 385 – 950 dwellings over the plan period is clearly not sufficient to cater for the significant economic growth planned.
Spawforths previous representations in response to Draft Policies and Proposed sites consultation (October 2018) included a report by Regeneris who consider that: “Doncaster has been one of the fastest growing economies in Yorkshire and Humber. The district has created around 21,000 jobs between 2000 and 2016, representing a growth rate of 1% p.a.”
The Publication Local Plan has set a target of delivering 481 hectares of employment land between 2015 and 2035 .There is therefore strong potential for Doncaster to accommodate high levels of inward investment in the future which would also drive jobs growth.
The proposed housing requirement in the Publication Local Plan (920 p.a) does not represent an appropriate figure once consideration is given to the potential for economic growth and job formation. Regeneris consider that Doncaster’s housing target over the plan period should be between 1,100 and 1,300 dpa to support future economic growth.
Firsure Ltd welcome the amended plan period for the Publication Plan which is now 2015-2035. The PPG and the Framework (2019) are explicit that a plan needs to be in place for 15 years from adoption. It is however disappointing that the increased housing numbers have been allocated to
the Airport on the condition of the airport providing significant levels of new jobs. An opportunity is being missed to sustainably grow the existing settlement of Rossington, the growth of which would provide much needed improvements to services and provision of affordable and market housing.
The Stripe Road site provides a realistic proposition as a housing site.
Firsure Ltd welcome the inclusion of reserve development sites within the Publication version of the Local Plan. However, as these sites are either within a HS2 safeguarding area or fail against sequential flood risk testing then they do not provide a long term solution for future areas of development.
The Framework (2019) is clear that where necessary Local Plans should identify areas of safeguarded land between the urban area and the Green Belt, in order to meet longer-term development needs stretching well beyond the plan period’ and that local authorities should ‘be able to demonstrate that Green Belt boundaries will not need to be altered at the end of the plan period’.
Given that the proposed plan runs until 2035 it is considered that the safeguarded land requirement should seek to match this. This will not only provide a robust long-term Green Belt boundary but will also provide certainty for residents and developers alike in terms of likely growth locations beyond the end of the plan period.
Doncaster is an integral part of the Sheffield City Region and its ambitious growth aspirations. The Strategic Economic Plan sets out Sheffield City Region’s plans to transform the local economy over the next decade. At the heart of the plan is the creation of 70,000 new private sector jobs and 6,000 new businesses. It is critical therefore that the emerging Local Plan for Doncaster responds positively to this economic growth by providing sufficient housing allocations.
KEY
Sustainable Transport Travel Time
Schools
Medical Centres
Dentists
Proposed Development
Recreation and Green Space
500m0 1km
10 Min Walking Distance
Pharmacies
Other Sites
Local Centres
Supermarkets
15 Min Walking Distance
N
I-PortAirport
Development
Amenity Location Map
M18
10 Min Cycle Distance
Great Yorkshire Way
Stripe Road Sustainable
Development
Growth in Rossington
Rossington is currently undergoing an exciting period of change. The colliery, closed in 2007, is now being redeveloped. In 2016 a new road link was completed between the A638 and M18 and then enhanced with a link directly to the nearby Doncaster Airport in 2018. The Airport has ambitious growth plans including a new railway connection to the East Coast Main line, 3 million sqft of logistics and advanced manufacturing space with an expected 73,000 jobs created. Immediately to the west of Rossington, Doncaster i-port a 337ha logistics park which will provide 6 million sqft of warehousing and is expected to provide up to 5,000 new jobs. Plans have been submitted for a European Tour Golf destination which will provide jobs, and raise the profile of Rossington.
The population of Rossington was estimated to be 13,536 in 2011(ONS) and had grown to 17,397 in 2017(ONS). A growth in population of 3,861. Parts of Rossington, in particular the southern and western parts of the town, are some of the most deprived parts of the country. An improved housing offer through new development can provide the homes required by a new workforce who are moving into the area.
Rossington is a sustainable settlement more “akin to a district centre” (DMBC Settlment Profiles, 2018) with good transport links and infrastructure already in place. The only measure which Rossington does not score highly upon in is the lack of a railway station.
However, there are plans for a new railway station at the airport which will be easily accessible from Rossington via sustainable means. The nearby South Doncaster Park and Ride already connects Rossington to the city centre and airport. Furthermore there are good bus connections which travel close to the Stripe Road site on Clay Flat Lane and Bond Street which provide regular services to Tickhill and Harworth. The excellent bus services within the area create opportunity for employment within urban Doncaster accessed by public transport.
Rossington is sustainable: economically, environmentally and socially. The town enjoys unparalleled inward investment in the form of the I-Port, the opening of the Great Yorkshire Way, investment at the airport and the potential PGA Golf course. The town benefits from a wealth of environmental assets including the nearby Yorkshire Wildlife Park, Potteric Carr Nature Reserve SS1, Great Holme Wood, Bawtry Forest and River Idle Washlands SSS1 are all in close proximity to the settlement. Social assets include a vibrant town centre, a swimming pool and community sports complex as well as numerous services as detailed below.
Rossington has three primary schools, one secondary school, two doctors surgeries and one clinic, two pharmacies, two dentists, a designated local centre and a number of neighbourhood shopping parades including 50+ units with a large supermarket as well as small independent shops.
St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School and Tornedale Infant School are within 10 minutes walk of the Stripe Road site and Rossington All Saints Academy provides secondary education within 5 minutes walk.
The Local Plan should be focusing more growth in Rossington. The Parish Council are currently preparing a Neighbourhood Plan which is seeking a greater mix of house types and tenures to suit the elderly as well as first time buyers, they are seeking more affordable homes and improvements to existing services. The aspirations outlined within the Neighbourhood Plan can only be provided through the delivery of more housing locally.
Rossington is demonstrably sustainable, however the level of housing planned as shown in the Publication Local Plan at between 385 – 950 dwellings up to 2035 does not match the expected levels of economic growth and investment in the vicinity.
There is an opportunity to build upon the assets which Rossington already has to rebalance the town by introducing new housing development to cater for the growing population. The site at Stripe Road presents an opportunity to ensure that Rossington has a housing offer which will be attractive to the incoming population, as well as the existing residents, which will continue the regeneration of Rossington to the benefit of the wider populace. This approach is aligned to the economic growth which the Publication version of the Local Plan is seeking to achieve.
Rossington is uniquely placed to take advantage of regenerative growth and become a truly sustainable modern settlement and focus for growth in the Borough. The plan, as drafted, focuses the vast majority of housing growth in Rossington at the Colliery site, this does not provide a robust platform for growth.
Harron Homes - 70 Homes Delivered
Residential Cell C. Reserved Matters - No Applications In.
Taylor Wimpey -Permission Granted for 190 Homes
Barrat Homes - Permission Granted for 184 Homes
Taylor Wimpey - 94 Homes, 21 Delivered
Housing Allocation with access from Residential Cell C.
KEY
Taylor Wimpey 94 Homes 21 Delivered
Barrat Homes Permission for 184 Homes
Allocated Housing with reserved matters
Allocated Housing
Harron Homes 70 Homes Delivered
Taylor Wimpey Permission for 190 Homes
N0 250m
Colliery SchemeDelivery Rates
125m
Housing Delivery in Rossington
That taken together with the draft allocation at the Former Torndale School field and other smaller permissions will only result in the delivery of approximately 700 units over the plan period (up to 2035) much less than the anticipated 1047 units from existing permissions and new allocations.
Unfortunately reliance upon one large residential development site will result in under delivery of housing.
The colliery site received outline planning permission for 1,200 houses and mixed uses in October 2013. Subsequently four reserved matters applications have been approved: Harron Homes in April 2015,
70 dwellings; Taylor Wimpey in April 2015, 94 dwellings; Barratt Homes in November 2018, 184 dwellings; and Taylor Wimpey in December 2018, 190 dwellings. According to the DMBC Residential Land Availability Report 2017/2018 (December 2018) and information gained directly from the developers actual delivery to date has only been 99 units.
The delivery rate in 17/18 (April to March) was 48 units. Due to the long lead in times, delivery rates since the grant of the first reserved matters application has only been c.33 dpa. Assuming similar delivery rates moving forward it is alarming to note that the colliery site will only deliver in the region of 600 units up to 2035. Annual average delivery rates shown (40 dpa) above
are above the delivery currently achieved. (33 dpa).
Therefore Firsure consider that to match the economic growth in Rossington the an appropriate housing target would be approximately 1,200 dwellings. There is therefore a shortfall of approximately 500 dwellings for Rossington.
A new housing allocation for approximately 500 units on the Stripe Road site can help to plug this gap by providing a housing site which can begin delivering in the short term. Lead in times and delivery rates will be much quicker due to the relatively straightforward nature of the site as demonstrated in our previously submitted representations.
Planned housing growth in Rossington does not match up with the economic growth planned in the area. The Rossington Colliery allocation will only deliver in the region of 600 dwellings over the plan period.
Parcel No. Dwellings Decision Date Net Completions 17/18 Total completions Total remaining
Taylor Wimpey Phase 1 94 Apr-15 21 21 73
Harron Homes Phase 70 Apr-15 27 70 0
Taylor Wimpey Phase 2 190 Dec-18 0 190 190
Barratt Homes Phase 184 Nov-18 0 184 184
Future Phase 1 ? ? ? ? ?
Future Phase 2 ? ? ? ? ?
Year 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 29/30 30/31 31/32 32/33 33/34 34/35 Total Delivery
Taylor Wimpey Phase 1
21 21 21 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73
Harron Homes Phase
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Taylor wimpey Phase 2
0 0 0 14 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 8 0 0 0 0 190
Barratt Homes Phase
22 24 24 24 24 24 24 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184
Future Phase 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 24 24 24 24 111
Future Phase 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 24 24 24 87
Annual Delivery
43 45 45 48 48 48 48 42 24 24 24 23 39 48 48 48 645
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
N0
Urban Extension Phasing
125m 250m
The land at Stripe Road, Rossington provides a residential development opportunity in a sustainable location close to shops, services and community facilities to meet the needs of the District and support the continued regeneration of Rossington. The site is currently located within the Green Belt and is available, suitable and achievable in accordance with the Framework.
Stripe Road
AvailabilityThe land is being promoted by Firsure Ltd as landowner. The site is therefore available in accordance with the Framework and the National Planning Practice Guidance (PPG).
SuitabilityThe proposed site utilises a small part of the existing Green Belt which is surrounded by development. To the east of the East Coast Mainline railway line is countryside, not designated as Green Belt and where proposals for an international golf course are planned. The development of the site will be an efficient use of land to provide quality development and new market and affordable homes for Rossington.
The site is located in a highly sustainable location and has residential development to the north, east and west. The site is within easy walking distance to local centres with a range of facilities provided there as well as greater facilities within Doncaster Town Centre, a bus ride away. There are a large number of primary and a secondary schools in the vicinity of the site.
The site is well served by transport providing opportunities for sustainable travel to work in Doncaster and beyond with access to Doncaster Railway Station and a potential new railway at the airport. The development will provide additional
quality development that will benefit Rossington and the wider district with economic, environmental and social benefits. It is therefore considered that the development is suitable.
AchievableA range of technical work has been undertaken and briefly summarised below. The assessments indicate that there are no technical issues that would prevent development or are insurmountable. The site is therefore considered to be achievable.
The indicative masterplan shows how a mix of housing can be accommodated within the site, alongside connectivity, landscaping and drainage features.
The highway work has included initial modelling to confirm the suitability of the site access and highway network to accommodate the proposed development.
The drainage work has identified a drainage strategy for the site. It has confirmed the attenuation required on site and demonstrated the suitability of the site for development.
Ecological survey work has confirmed there are no ecological constraints to the development of the site and recommended
how habitats can be enhanced and created.Ground investigation has confirmed the suitability of the site to accommodate future development.
Economics The relationship between economic performance in an area and housing is complex, but having the right quantity, quality and balance of housing in an area is necessary for economic growth.
The development of the Stripe Road scheme can therefore support local economic growth, both through direct job creation through the construction phase of the scheme, but also through the increased population which will create sustainable local jobs from the increased demand for goods and services. This provides an important sustainable development opportunity in Rossington.
SummaryThe site at Stripe Road provides a development opportunity that is available, suitable and achievable and therefore it is considered that the site is deliverable, in accordance with national planning policy and guidance.
M18
Great Yorkshire Way
Stripe Road Sustainable
Development
10 Min Walking Distance
Proposed PGA Golf site
Colliery Scheme
I-Port
Airport Development
879 - Allocated Employment
Conclusion
A638
15 Min Walking Distance
10 Min Cycle Distance
KEY
M18 Connection
Great Yorkshire Way
Rail Links
Employment Site
Proposed and Existing Schemes
Existing Settlement
Site
500m0 1kmN
Doncaster Park and Ride
Conclusion
The Publication version of the Local Plan quite rightly places a strategic focus of growth in South Doncaster. However, this is primarily focused on the Aerotropolis development at the airport. It would make more sense to further develop the nearby sustainable settlement of Rossington by focussing more growth here.
The role and function of Rossington has fundamentally changed due to the investment in the locality.
The current housing growth in Rossington is focused at the former colliery site which is slowly delivering units (c.30 dpa). Whilst this is welcome, it does not make the most of the opportunities presented for regeneration and rebalancing in Rossington.
Firsure contend that the housing target for Rossington should be in the region of 1,200 dwellings over the plan period. The current allocations and permissions in Rossington will only deliver approximately 700 dwellings over the plan period and thus there is a short fall of 500 units.
A further housing allocation is required to build upon the assets which Rossington already has by improving the housing offer to the existing and incoming population attracted to the area by significant economic investments nearby.
Rossington has the opportunity to transform into a prosperous sustainable settlement, however to this the housing offer must be improved.
The site at Stripe Road presents an opportunity to develop approximately 500 dwellings. The site is located to the south of Rossington in a triangle of land between existing housing areas and adjacent to the East Coast Mainline in an area currently designated as Green Belt.
Stripe Road is within 10 mins walk (800m) of the Gattison Lane Local Centres with good access to major bus routes.
The site is a protrusion of Green Belt within an existing residential area of Rossington.
The site is adjacent to existing housing to the north, east and west with the East Coast Mainline separating the site from residential development to the east.
It has been demonstrated that the site is available, suitable and achievable and therefore deliverable in accordance with the NPPF.
The site represents a highly sustainable development opportunity with access to existing facilities and services. It is a logical extension to the urban area of Rossington and supports the continued housing and economic growth of the Borough.
Rossington needs to continue to grow to support and take advantage of the investment and economic growth in the settlement. Unparalleled levels of investment have taken place in Rossington and the population has grown, however planned housing growth needs to match this.
Key Benefits
Optimum location to assist in the continued growth and regeneration of Rossington
Gross Value Added of around £75 millionGVA
Circa £12 million Annual Household Expenditure
The delivery of circa 500 new homes in a range of house types, sizes and tenure
Circa 1,750 new jobs (direct and in-direct) from the construction of the residential scheme alone
At least £2.5 million of first occupation expenditure