from research tool to primary end point in clinical trials

6
1 st Announcement International Symposium on Minimal Residual Disease in Hematological Malignancies: From research tool to primary end point in clinical trials Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 8-9 November 2012 0 1 2 3 4 relative frequency of leukemic cells follow-up in years detection limit of immunophenotyping and PCR techniques “cure” detection limit of cytomorphological techniques I C II maintenance Rx Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) 1 10 -1 10 -2 10 -3 10 -5 10 -4 10 -6 10 -7 0 APS mix of 3 different regenerating B-cell populations (haematogones) EuroFlow Consortium; Responsible scientist: L. Lhermitte BCP-ALL blast cells APS 2 RQ-PCR analysis of TCR/Ig rearrangements EuroMRD (ESG-MRD-ALL) Guideline Report. Leukemia 2007; 21: 604-611. Cycle delta Rn MNC -2 10 -3 10 -4 10 -5 10 10 -1 Quantitative range Sensitivity threshold CT Background 10 20 30 40 50 0 1 10 1 10 -2 10 -3 10 -4 10 -1 Survival according to the combined MRD information at time points 1 and 2 (n=129) 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 100 % relapse free survival p(trend)<0.001 months from time point 2 low risk group (n=55) intermediate risk group (n=55) high risk group (n=19) I-BFM-SG Report: Lancet 1998; 352: 1731-1738.

Upload: others

Post on 09-Feb-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: From research tool to primary end point in clinical trials

1st AnnouncementInternationalSymposiumon

MinimalResidualDiseaseinHematologicalMalignancies:

From research tool to primary end point in clinical trials

Rotterdam,TheNetherlands,8-9November 2012

Over the last 25 to 30 years, detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) has evolved from a research tool to a clinical diagnostic tool for evaluation of treatment effective-ness in patients with a hematological malignancy. Initially MRD research was fo-cused on technology development, mainly flow cytometry and PCR techniques. Over the last 10 years special attention has been given to standardization, guidelines for interpretation and reporting of results, and quality assurance, all factors that are criti-cally important for clinical implementation of MRD diagnostics. Until recently, quan-titative PCR technologies had a preferred position, mainly because of the higher sensitivity and standardization. However the novel 8-colour flow cytometric MRD strat-egies become highly attractive because of their speed and easy reference database.

Over the last 10 to 15 years, MRD diagnostics has proven to recognize risk groups that differ significantly in prognosis, thereby allowing treatment intervention. In parallel, mul-tiple novel drugs have been developed for patients with a hematological malignancy, re-sulting in a major increase of overall progression free survival and disease free survival.

MRD is now regarded as an early treatment response marker, which might be re-garded as a surrogate endpoint. Acceptation of MRD diagnostics to define the pri-mary end point in clinical studies can speed-up the evaluation of novel drugs significantly and improve patient care in hemato-oncology. This requires fully stan-dardized and quality controlled MRD diagnostics, approved by EMA and FDA.

The MRD Symposium will address all above topics in five interactive sessions.

Generalinformation

Date8-9 November 2012

VenueCongress Centre De DoelenJurriaanse zaalKruisplein 30, RotterdamThe Netherlands

RegistrationRegistration via www.hetcongresbureau.nl(see Congresagenda)Registration till 30 September 2012: € 195,-Registration after 30 September 2012: € 225,-

Cancellationandrefunds:All cancellations should be in writing and sent to Ms. Bernice Beukenkamp ([email protected]). In case of cancellation until September 30, 2012 a refund is possible minus a service charge of €15,-. For cancellations from October 1 - 25, 2012 we will substract 50% of the registration fee, and return the remaining. For cancellations after October 25, 2012 there will be no refund and the full amount will remain due.

Information and organization Dept. ImmunologyErasmus MCDr. Molewaterplein 503015 GE RotterdamTel: +31-10-704 40 94Fax: +31-10-704 47 31E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Erasmus MC - het CongresbureauBernice BeukenkampP.O. Box 2040 3000 CA RotterdamTel: +31-10-703 16 21Fax: +31-10-704 47 37E-mail: [email protected]

ScientificCommittee

• J.J.M. van Dongen (chair)• P. Bader• M. Brüggemann• G. Cazzaniga• J. Hancock• M. Kneba• E. Macintyre• A. Orfao• C. Pott• T. Raff• B. Schäfer• A. Schrauder• T. Szczepanski• V.H.J. van der Velden

Organizing Committee

• J.J.M. van Dongen• M. Brüggemann• A. Schrauder• W.M. Comans-Bitter• B. van Bodegom• C. Linker• B. Beukenkamp

0 1 2 3 4

rela

tive

frequ

ency

of l

euke

mic

cel

ls

follow-up in years

detection limit ofimmunophenotypingand PCR techniques

“cure”

detection limit ofcytomorphological

techniques

I C II maintenance Rx

Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD)1

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-5

10-4

10-6

10-7

0APS

mix of 3 different regenerating B-cell populations (haematogones)

EuroFlow Consortium; Responsible scientist: L. Lhermitte

BCP-ALL blast cells

APS 2

RQ-PCR analysis of TCR/Ig rearrangements

EuroMRD (ESG-MRD-ALL) Guideline Report. Leukemia 2007; 21: 604-611. Cycle

delta

Rn

MNC

-210-310-410-510

10-1

Quantitative rangeSensitivity

threshold

CT

Background

10 20 30 40 500

1

101

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-1

Survival according to the combined MRD informationat time points 1 and 2 (n=129)

0 20 40 60 800

20

40

60

80

100

% re

laps

e fre

e su

rviv

al

p(trend)<0.001

months from time point 2

low risk group (n=55)

intermediate risk group (n=55)

high risk group (n=19)

I-BFM-SG Report: Lancet 1998; 352: 1731-1738.

Page 2: From research tool to primary end point in clinical trials

Discussion

19:30 – 23:00 Dinner

Friday, 9 November 2012

08:30 – 10:30 SESSION 5: MRD as primary endpoint in clinical trials Chair: J.J.M. van Dongen

• Role of MRD diagnostics as surrogate for predicting clinical benefitofnoveltreatment SpeakerfromEMAtobeconfirmed(20-25min)

• Challenging the current clinical response criteria in leukemia and lymphoma: is it time for a change? Speakertobeconfirmed(15-20min)

• Howtoassesssingledrugefficacyinmoderntreatment protocols Speakertobeconfirmed(10-15min)

• MRD diagnostics as surrogate marker for outcome: issues in validation and trial design M.G.Valsecchi(15-20min)

• Standardization guidelines and QC T.Raff(10-15min)

10:30 – 11:00 Coffee/Tea

11:00 – 12:45 Round table discussion:

• MRD as primary endpoint in registration trials: position of the regulatory authorities • Need for worldwide standardization and validation of MRD diagnostics

12:45 – 12:55 Summary and future perspectives J.J.M. van Dongen

12:55 – 13:00 Closing Remarks

13:00 – 13:45 Lunch

• Criteria for the application of valid biomarkers in hemato- oncology Speakertobeconfirmed(EMArepresentative)(15-20min) ALL • Introduction on ALL V.Conter(5-10min)

• Application of MRD diagnostics in the design of childhood ALL protocols M.Schrappe(10-15min)

• Application of MRD diagnostics in the design of adult ALL protocols N.Gökbuget(10-15min)

• Do we need MRD diagnostics for improving SCT strategies in ALL? P.Bader(10-15min)

• MRD-based recognition of low-risk groups for treatment reduction R.Pieters(10-15min)

15:30 – 16:00 Coffee/Tea

16:00 – 18:00 SESSION 4: MRD diagnostics for treatment decision in mature lymphoid malignancies: how far are we from a valid biomarker status? Chair: Ch. Pott and P. Sonneveld

Lymphoma • Introduction on lymphoma M.Kneba(5-10min)

• MRD diagnostics in follicular lymphomas M.Ladetto(10-15min)

• MRD diagnostics in mantle cell lymphoma M.H.Delfau(10-15min)

• MRD strategies in Burkitt lymphoma Speakertobeconfirmed(10min)

CLL and MM • Introduction on CLL and MM P.Sonneveld(5-10min)

• MRD application in CLL treatment Speakertobeconfirmed(10-15min)

• IntroductionofMRDdiagnosticsforstratificationinMMprotocols B.Paiva(10-15min)

Thursday, 8 November 2012

08:00 – 09:00 Registration and Coffee/Tea

09:00 – 09:10 Welcome – J.J.M. van Dongen

09:10 – 10:30 SESSION 1: MRD techniques: State of the art Chair: E. Macintyre

• MRD detection by Ig/TCR targets: State of the art J.J.M.vanDongen(20min)

• Flow cytometry for MRD detection: State of the art A.Orfao(20min)

• ComparisonbetweenPCRandflowcytometry G.Gaipa(5-10min) H.Cave(5-10min) S.Böttcher(5-10min) V.H.J.vanderVelden(5-10min)

10:30 – 11:00 Coffee/Tea

11:00 – 12:30 SESSION 2: MRD diagnostics: new developments Chair: A. Orfao

• News from the EuroMRD network: new targets and technical advances G.Cazzaniga(10-15min)

• Relevance of subclone detection and implications for targeted therapy in ALL M.Brüggemann(10-15min)

• High Throughput Sequencing: position for MRD Speakertobeconfirmed(10-15min)

• News from the EuroFlow network: new MRD tubes and bioinformatics-assisted automated analysis T.Sczcepański(10-15min)

• Newdevelopmentsin8-colorflowcytrometicMRDdetection in US Speakertobeconfirmed(10-15min)

12:30 – 13:30 Lunch

13:30 – 15:30 SESSION 3: MRD diagnostics for treatment decision in ALL: are the criteriaforavalidbiomarkerfulfilled? Chair:V.ConterandJ.J.M.vanDongen

Page 3: From research tool to primary end point in clinical trials

Discussion

19:30 – 23:00 Dinner

Friday, 9 November 2012

08:30 – 10:30 SESSION 5: MRD as primary endpoint in clinical trials Chair: J.J.M. van Dongen

• Role of MRD diagnostics as surrogate for predicting clinical benefitofnoveltreatment SpeakerfromEMAtobeconfirmed(20-25min)

• Challenging the current clinical response criteria in leukemia and lymphoma: is it time for a change? Speakertobeconfirmed(15-20min)

• Howtoassesssingledrugefficacyinmoderntreatment protocols Speakertobeconfirmed(10-15min)

• MRD diagnostics as surrogate marker for outcome: issues in validation and trial design M.G.Valsecchi(15-20min)

• Standardization guidelines and QC T.Raff(10-15min)

10:30 – 11:00 Coffee/Tea

11:00 – 12:45 Round table discussion:

• MRD as primary endpoint in registration trials: position of the regulatory authorities • Need for worldwide standardization and validation of MRD diagnostics

12:45 – 12:55 Summary and future perspectives J.J.M. van Dongen

12:55 – 13:00 Closing Remarks

13:00 – 13:45 Lunch

• Criteria for the application of valid biomarkers in hemato- oncology Speakertobeconfirmed(EMArepresentative)(15-20min) ALL • Introduction on ALL V.Conter(5-10min)

• Application of MRD diagnostics in the design of childhood ALL protocols M.Schrappe(10-15min)

• Application of MRD diagnostics in the design of adult ALL protocols N.Gökbuget(10-15min)

• Do we need MRD diagnostics for improving SCT strategies in ALL? P.Bader(10-15min)

• MRD-based recognition of low-risk groups for treatment reduction R.Pieters(10-15min)

15:30 – 16:00 Coffee/Tea

16:00 – 18:00 SESSION 4: MRD diagnostics for treatment decision in mature lymphoid malignancies: how far are we from a valid biomarker status? Chair: Ch. Pott and P. Sonneveld

Lymphoma • Introduction on lymphoma M.Kneba(5-10min)

• MRD diagnostics in follicular lymphomas M.Ladetto(10-15min)

• MRD diagnostics in mantle cell lymphoma M.H.Delfau(10-15min)

• MRD strategies in Burkitt lymphoma Speakertobeconfirmed(10min)

CLL and MM • Introduction on CLL and MM P.Sonneveld(5-10min)

• MRD application in CLL treatment Speakertobeconfirmed(10-15min)

• IntroductionofMRDdiagnosticsforstratificationinMMprotocols B.Paiva(10-15min)

Thursday, 8 November 2012

08:00 – 09:00 Registration and Coffee/Tea

09:00 – 09:10 Welcome – J.J.M. van Dongen

09:10 – 10:30 SESSION 1: MRD techniques: State of the art Chair: E. Macintyre

• MRD detection by Ig/TCR targets: State of the art J.J.M.vanDongen(20min)

• Flow cytometry for MRD detection: State of the art A.Orfao(20min)

• ComparisonbetweenPCRandflowcytometry G.Gaipa(5-10min) H.Cave(5-10min) S.Böttcher(5-10min) V.H.J.vanderVelden(5-10min)

10:30 – 11:00 Coffee/Tea

11:00 – 12:30 SESSION 2: MRD diagnostics: new developments Chair: A. Orfao

• News from the EuroMRD network: new targets and technical advances G.Cazzaniga(10-15min)

• Relevance of subclone detection and implications for targeted therapy in ALL M.Brüggemann(10-15min)

• High Throughput Sequencing: position for MRD Speakertobeconfirmed(10-15min)

• News from the EuroFlow network: new MRD tubes and bioinformatics-assisted automated analysis T.Sczcepański(10-15min)

• Newdevelopmentsin8-colorflowcytrometicMRDdetection in US Speakertobeconfirmed(10-15min)

12:30 – 13:30 Lunch

13:30 – 15:30 SESSION 3: MRD diagnostics for treatment decision in ALL: are the criteriaforavalidbiomarkerfulfilled? Chair:V.ConterandJ.J.M.vanDongen

Page 4: From research tool to primary end point in clinical trials

Discussion

19:30 – 23:00 Dinner

Friday, 9 November 2012

08:30 – 10:30 SESSION 5: MRD as primary endpoint in clinical trials Chair: J.J.M. van Dongen

• Role of MRD diagnostics as surrogate for predicting clinical benefitofnoveltreatment SpeakerfromEMAtobeconfirmed(20-25min)

• Challenging the current clinical response criteria in leukemia and lymphoma: is it time for a change? Speakertobeconfirmed(15-20min)

• Howtoassesssingledrugefficacyinmoderntreatment protocols Speakertobeconfirmed(10-15min)

• MRD diagnostics as surrogate marker for outcome: issues in validation and trial design M.G.Valsecchi(15-20min)

• Standardization guidelines and QC T.Raff(10-15min)

10:30 – 11:00 Coffee/Tea

11:00 – 12:45 Round table discussion:

• MRD as primary endpoint in registration trials: position of the regulatory authorities • Need for worldwide standardization and validation of MRD diagnostics

12:45 – 12:55 Summary and future perspectives J.J.M. van Dongen

12:55 – 13:00 Closing Remarks

13:00 – 13:45 Lunch

• Criteria for the application of valid biomarkers in hemato- oncology Speakertobeconfirmed(EMArepresentative)(15-20min) ALL • Introduction on ALL V.Conter(5-10min)

• Application of MRD diagnostics in the design of childhood ALL protocols M.Schrappe(10-15min)

• Application of MRD diagnostics in the design of adult ALL protocols N.Gökbuget(10-15min)

• Do we need MRD diagnostics for improving SCT strategies in ALL? P.Bader(10-15min)

• MRD-based recognition of low-risk groups for treatment reduction R.Pieters(10-15min)

15:30 – 16:00 Coffee/Tea

16:00 – 18:00 SESSION 4: MRD diagnostics for treatment decision in mature lymphoid malignancies: how far are we from a valid biomarker status? Chair: Ch. Pott and P. Sonneveld

Lymphoma • Introduction on lymphoma M.Kneba(5-10min)

• MRD diagnostics in follicular lymphomas M.Ladetto(10-15min)

• MRD diagnostics in mantle cell lymphoma M.H.Delfau(10-15min)

• MRD strategies in Burkitt lymphoma Speakertobeconfirmed(10min)

CLL and MM • Introduction on CLL and MM P.Sonneveld(5-10min)

• MRD application in CLL treatment Speakertobeconfirmed(10-15min)

• IntroductionofMRDdiagnosticsforstratificationinMMprotocols B.Paiva(10-15min)

Thursday, 8 November 2012

08:00 – 09:00 Registration and Coffee/Tea

09:00 – 09:10 Welcome – J.J.M. van Dongen

09:10 – 10:30 SESSION 1: MRD techniques: State of the art Chair: E. Macintyre

• MRD detection by Ig/TCR targets: State of the art J.J.M.vanDongen(20min)

• Flow cytometry for MRD detection: State of the art A.Orfao(20min)

• ComparisonbetweenPCRandflowcytometry G.Gaipa(5-10min) H.Cave(5-10min) S.Böttcher(5-10min) V.H.J.vanderVelden(5-10min)

10:30 – 11:00 Coffee/Tea

11:00 – 12:30 SESSION 2: MRD diagnostics: new developments Chair: A. Orfao

• News from the EuroMRD network: new targets and technical advances G.Cazzaniga(10-15min)

• Relevance of subclone detection and implications for targeted therapy in ALL M.Brüggemann(10-15min)

• High Throughput Sequencing: position for MRD Speakertobeconfirmed(10-15min)

• News from the EuroFlow network: new MRD tubes and bioinformatics-assisted automated analysis T.Sczcepański(10-15min)

• Newdevelopmentsin8-colorflowcytrometicMRDdetection in US Speakertobeconfirmed(10-15min)

12:30 – 13:30 Lunch

13:30 – 15:30 SESSION 3: MRD diagnostics for treatment decision in ALL: are the criteriaforavalidbiomarkerfulfilled? Chair:V.ConterandJ.J.M.vanDongen

Page 5: From research tool to primary end point in clinical trials

1st AnnouncementInternational Symposium on

Minimal Residual Disease in Hematological Malignancies:

Fromresearchtooltoprimaryendpointinclinicaltrials

Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 8-9 November 2012

Over the last 25 to 30 years, detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) has evolved from research tool to a clinical diagnostic tool for evaluation of treatment effectiveness in patients with a hematological malignancy. Initially MRD research was focused on tech-nology development, mainly flow cytometry and PCR techniques. Over the last 10 years special attention has been given to standardization, guidelines for interpretation and re-porting of results, and quality assurance, all factors that are critically important for clinical implementation of MRD diagnostics. Until recently, quantitative PCR technologies had a preferred position, mainly because of the higher sensitivity and standardization. However the novel 8-colour flow cytometric MRD strategies become highly attractive because of their speed and easy reference database.

Over the last 10 to 15 years, MRD diagnostics has proven to recognize risk groups that differ significantly in prognosis, thereby allowing treatment intervention. In parallel, mul-tiple novel drugs have been developed for patients with a hematological malignancy, re-sulting in a major increase of overall progression free survival and disease free survival.

MRD is now regarded as an early treatment response marker, but it is still questionable whether MRD might be regarded as a surrogate endpoint of survival. Acceptation of MRD diagnostics to define the primary end point in clinical studies can speed-up the evaluation of novel drugs significantly and improve patient care in hemato-oncology. This requires careful considerations as well as fully standardized and quality controlled MRD diagnos-tics, approved by EMA and FDA.

The MRD Symposium will address all above topics in five interactive sessions.

General information

Date8-9 November 2012

VenueCongress Centre De DoelenJurriaanse zaalKruisplein 30, RotterdamThe Netherlands

Registration and InformationFor more information, accommodation and registration please check the website: www.hetcongresbureau.nl (congresagenda).Registration fees:- Registration till 30 September 2012: € 195,-- Registration after 30 September 2012: € 225,-

Cancellation and refundsAll cancellations should be in writing (e-mail) and sent to Ms. Bernice Beukenkamp.In case of cancellation: - Until September 30, 2012 a refund is possible minus a service charge of €15.- Between September 30 and October 25, 2012 you will have to pay 50% of the total amount you are registered for. - After October 25, 2012 no refund will be possible and the full amount will remain due.

Information and organization Dept. ImmunologyErasmus MCDr. Molewaterplein 503015 GE RotterdamTel: +31-10-704 40 94Fax: +31-10-704 47 31E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Erasmus MC - het CongresbureauBernice BeukenkampP.O. Box 2040 3000 CA RotterdamTel: +31-10-703 16 21Fax: +31-10-704 47 37E-mail: [email protected]

ScientificCommittee

• J.J.M. van Dongen (chair)• P. Bader• M. Brüggemann• G. Cazzaniga• J. Hancock• M. Kneba• E. Macintyre• A. Orfao• C. Pott• T. Raff• B. Schäfer• A. Schrauder• T. Szczepanski• V.H.J. van der Velden

Organizing Committee

• J.J.M. van Dongen• M. Brüggemann• A. Schrauder• W.M. Comans-Bitter• B. van Bodegom• C. Linker• B. Beukenkamp

0 1 2 3 4

rela

tive

frequ

ency

of l

euke

mic

cel

ls

follow-up in years

detection limit ofimmunophenotypingand PCR techniques

“cure”

detection limit ofcytomorphological

techniques

I C II maintenance Rx

Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD)1

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-5

10-4

10-6

10-7

0APS

mix of 3 different regenerating B-cell populations (haematogones)

EuroFlow Consortium; Responsible scientist: L. Lhermitte

BCP-ALL blast cells

APS 2

RQ-PCR analysis of TCR/Ig rearrangements

EuroMRD (ESG-MRD-ALL) Guideline Report. Leukemia 2007; 21: 604-611. Cycle

delta

Rn

MNC

-210-310-410-510

10-1

Quantitative rangeSensitivity

threshold

CT

Background

10 20 30 40 500

1

101

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-1

Survival according to the combined MRD informationat time points 1 and 2 (n=129)

0 20 40 60 800

20

40

60

80

100

% re

laps

e fre

e su

rviv

al

p(trend)<0.001

months from time point 2

low risk group (n=55)

intermediate risk group (n=55)

high risk group (n=19)

I-BFM-SG Report: Lancet 1998; 352: 1731-1738.

Page 6: From research tool to primary end point in clinical trials

1st AnnouncementInternational Symposium on

Minimal Residual Disease in Hematological Malignancies:

Fromresearchtooltoprimaryendpointinclinicaltrials

Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 8-9 November 2012

Over the last 25 to 30 years, detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) has evolved from research tool to a clinical diagnostic tool for evaluation of treatment effectiveness in patients with a hematological malignancy. Initially MRD research was focused on tech-nology development, mainly flow cytometry and PCR techniques. Over the last 10 years special attention has been given to standardization, guidelines for interpretation and re-porting of results, and quality assurance, all factors that are critically important for clinical implementation of MRD diagnostics. Until recently, quantitative PCR technologies had a preferred position, mainly because of the higher sensitivity and standardization. However the novel 8-colour flow cytometric MRD strategies become highly attractive because of their speed and easy reference database.

Over the last 10 to 15 years, MRD diagnostics has proven to recognize risk groups that differ significantly in prognosis, thereby allowing treatment intervention. In parallel, mul-tiple novel drugs have been developed for patients with a hematological malignancy, re-sulting in a major increase of overall progression free survival and disease free survival.

MRD is now regarded as an early treatment response marker, but it is still questionable whether MRD might be regarded as a surrogate endpoint of survival. Acceptation of MRD diagnostics to define the primary end point in clinical studies can speed-up the evaluation of novel drugs significantly and improve patient care in hemato-oncology. This requires careful considerations as well as fully standardized and quality controlled MRD diagnos-tics, approved by EMA and FDA.

The MRD Symposium will address all above topics in five interactive sessions.

General information

Date8-9 November 2012

VenueCongress Centre De DoelenJurriaanse zaalKruisplein 30, RotterdamThe Netherlands

Registration and InformationFor more information, accommodation and registration please check the website: www.hetcongresbureau.nl (congresagenda).Registration fees:- Registration till 30 September 2012: € 195,-- Registration after 30 September 2012: € 225,-

Cancellation and refundsAll cancellations should be in writing (e-mail) and sent to Ms. Bernice Beukenkamp.In case of cancellation: - Until September 30, 2012 a refund is possible minus a service charge of €15.- Between September 30 and October 25, 2012 you will have to pay 50% of the total amount you are registered for. - After October 25, 2012 no refund will be possible and the full amount will remain due.

Information and organization Dept. ImmunologyErasmus MCDr. Molewaterplein 503015 GE RotterdamTel: +31-10-704 40 94Fax: +31-10-704 47 31E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Erasmus MC - het CongresbureauBernice BeukenkampP.O. Box 2040 3000 CA RotterdamTel: +31-10-703 16 21Fax: +31-10-704 47 37E-mail: [email protected]

ScientificCommittee

• J.J.M. van Dongen (chair)• P. Bader• M. Brüggemann• G. Cazzaniga• J. Hancock• M. Kneba• E. Macintyre• A. Orfao• C. Pott• T. Raff• B. Schäfer• A. Schrauder• T. Szczepanski• V.H.J. van der Velden

Organizing Committee

• J.J.M. van Dongen• M. Brüggemann• A. Schrauder• W.M. Comans-Bitter• B. van Bodegom• C. Linker• B. Beukenkamp

0 1 2 3 4

rela

tive

frequ

ency

of l

euke

mic

cel

ls

follow-up in years

detection limit ofimmunophenotypingand PCR techniques

“cure”

detection limit ofcytomorphological

techniques

I C II maintenance Rx

Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD)1

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-5

10-4

10-6

10-7

0APS

mix of 3 different regenerating B-cell populations (haematogones)

EuroFlow Consortium; Responsible scientist: L. Lhermitte

BCP-ALL blast cells

APS 2

RQ-PCR analysis of TCR/Ig rearrangements

EuroMRD (ESG-MRD-ALL) Guideline Report. Leukemia 2007; 21: 604-611. Cycle

delta

Rn

MNC

-210-310-410-510

10-1

Quantitative rangeSensitivity

threshold

CT

Background

10 20 30 40 500

1

101

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-1

Survival according to the combined MRD informationat time points 1 and 2 (n=129)

0 20 40 60 800

20

40

60

80

100

% re

laps

e fre

e su

rviv

al

p(trend)<0.001

months from time point 2

low risk group (n=55)

intermediate risk group (n=55)

high risk group (n=19)

I-BFM-SG Report: Lancet 1998; 352: 1731-1738.