from application to certification · aerodrome workshop implementation of r139/2014 ‘avram...
TRANSCRIPT
1
From application to certification
18-19 April 2013, ADR Conference, Bucharest, Romania
AERODROME WORKSHOP IMPLEMENTATION OF R139/2014
‘Avram Iancu’ Int. Airport, Cluj Napoca
20 – 21 September 2015
TE.GEN.00409-001
Establishment of the CB – panel discussion –
Predrag Sekulic, EASA
George Lazăr, RCAA
ADR ‘in the scope’, Art. 4 summary report
589 ADR ‘in the scope’ Incl. 102 ADR for possible exemption
3 22 September 2015
4
ADR ‘in the scope’, Art. 4 summary report
22 September 2015
CS
IR
BR/ER
AMC
GM
Age
ncy
EC
EP
& C
ou
nci
l
No
n-B
ind
ing
Bin
din
g
Regulatory framework
5 22 September 2015
Certification basis (CB)
6 22 September 2015
The concept
7
Certification Specifications
Equivalent level
of Safety
Special Condition Deviation Acceptance and Action Document
ADR design
22 September 2015
8
Infrastructure Ref. BR Art. 8a.2(b)
The story
ADR Certificate
DAAD* AMC GM
Organization & Operations Ref. BR Art. 8a.5
IRs = Implementing Rules
CSs = Certification Specifications
ELOS= Equivalent Level of Safety
SC= Special Condition
GM= Guidance Material
AMC= Acceptable Means of Compliance
GM
*For pre-existing deviations only:
Additional option of acceptance via “DAAD“ mechanism; Ref. 139/2014, Art. 7
22 September 2015
9
Infrastructure Ref. BR Art. 8a.2(b)
Establishment of the CB
DAAD*
• The components of an agreed CB are the relevant CS used, ELOS and Special Conditions (if accepted and prescribed).
• ELOS, Special Condition and DAAD cases must be supported by a Safety Assessment.
• ELOS, Special Condition and DAAD must be documented.
• Agreed CB is binding on an individual basis to the applicant.
* For pre-existing deviations only: Additional option of acceptance via “DAAD“ mechanism (Art. 7 of 139/2014)
GM
22 September 2015
10
Certification Specifications (CS) are technical standards for aerodrome design
Certification Specifications
(mentioned in ADR.ARC.020)
11
• CS’s are non-binding technical standards adopted by the EASA to meet the essential requirements of the Basic Regulation (Annex Va) for the purpose of certification.
• CS’s relevant for the type of operations are to used by the applicant. • CS’s to be used by the applicant in the last effective version. • Once established using the CS’s, the agreed CB, becomes binding on an
individual basis to the applicant. • ADR operator needs to comply with any relevant new CS’s.
Relevant and latest effective CS are to be
used
CA needs to confirm that these are the applicable CS
Become component of
binding CB
Elements of Certification Basis (ADR.AR.C.020)
22 September 2015
Can apply to any deviation from the relevant CS
Only used when CA accepts the possibility to demonstrate ELOS
If accepted then component of
binding CB
12
Elements of Certification Basis (ADR.AR.C.020)
• Should an applicant not meet the recommendation of the relevant CS, he can propose an ELOS that demonstrates how he meets the intent of the CS.
• If allowed to do so, the applicant has to demonstrate the ELOS. • Applicant must undertake Safety Assessment. • ELOS must be documented. • When accepted by the CA would not be linked to conditions.
Equivalent Level of Safety (ELOS)
(see ADR.AR.C.020)
22 September 2015
13
Elements of Certification Basis (ADR.AR.C.020)
• SC can be used when the relevant CS is inappropriate or inadequate because:
• physical, topographical or similar limitations related to the location of ADR; or
• ADR has novel or unusual design features; or
• experience from the operation of that ADR or others having similar design features has shown that safety may be endangered.
• Before prescribing a SC a safety assessment must be undertaken.
• SC comprises the technical specification and/or the limitations, operations conditions and procedures that the applicant has to fulfil
Special condition (SC) (see ADR.AR.C.025)
Special detailed technical specifications to ensure
compliance with the ER’s of Annex Va
Can only be prescribed by CA If prescribed then
component of binding CB
22 September 2015
Only a possibility for CA if ELOS or Special Condition impossible
CA compiles evidence and specifies period of validity
Extra document not part of CB
14
(maybe) attached to Certificate
• DAAD only for Pre-existing deviation/s (pre-2014).
• New DAAD applications until 2024 but longer validity possible.
• Safety assessment to be done and mitigation put in place.
• Regular review of DAAD validity and the mitigation measures needed.
• Action to remove DAAD may be possible or desired in the future
Deviation Acceptance and Action Document (DAAD, see Art.6)
22 September 2015
15
CS’s =
Technical Standards that, if used, comply
with safety requirements
NAA can agree on
deviations,
if
applicant proves that an applicable CS is inadequate/inappropriate + establishes
with NAA special technical specifications to comply with ER’s
applicant proves that another design meets safety requirements and has a
level of safety equivalent to the applicable CS
CB is the NAA’s confirmation of how an applicant can show
compliance with the safety requirements (ER’s and IR’s)
CB as
established
by NAA on
applicant’s
proposal
or
CSs
established
by EASA
Deviations established by NAAs (local flexibility)
DAAD is part of the certificate and not of CB
Certification basis (CB)
22 September 2015
CB example Kolndorf - Conf. 2012
16 22 September 2015
17
CB example – Today
22 September 2015
CB example – CAA Romania (LRTR)
18 22 September 2015
CB example – CAA Switzerland
19
source FOCA
22 September 2015
20
source FOCA
CB example – CAA Switzerland
22 September 2015
21
source FOCA
CB example – CAA Switzerland
22 September 2015
22
source CAA UK
CB example – CAA United Kingdom
22 September 2015
23
source CAA DK
CB example – CAA Denmark
22 September 2015
24
CB example – CAA Croatia
source CAA CRO
22 September 2015
25
CB example – CAA Croatia
source CAA CRO
22 September 2015
26
27
YOUR
OPINION
MATTERS!
CB for the conversion of certificate
CB for new aerodrome certification
CB for a change
Composition / content of CB
Application for a certificate
Initiation of the certification process / Declaration of compliance
Desk top review and audits / inspections
CS versus GM
Special condition & ELOS
Safeguarding of Aerodromes
Proposals for future developments 28
Topics for the discussion:
22 September 2015
Thank you!
Aerodrome operators realised that they are given more responsibility to ensure they are compliant with the rules.
An important factor in the conversion of the aerodromes has been the flexibility built into the rules that has allowed both the CAA and the aerodrome operators to mitigate some of the unusual issues that have arisen.
30
Remarks on implementation 139/2014
22 September 2015
31