fresno systemic program national science foundation usp mid-point review and accomplishments...
TRANSCRIPT
Fresno Systemic Program
National Science FoundationUSP Mid-point Review and Accomplishments
February 10, 2003
Fresno Schools –
Making A+ DifferenceFor Every Student, Every Day
Dr Santiago V. Wood, Superintendent
FSP Senior Leadership Team
• Dr. Carole Sarkisian-Bonard– Associate Superintendent, Assistant to the Superintendent
• Jerry Valadez– Science Coordinator, K-12
• Caran Resciniti– Mathematics Coordinator, K-12
• Dave Calhoun– Administrative Analyst, Lead Evaluator
Fresno Unified School District
• 4th Largest in California (80,000 students)
• 92 Schools (61 Elem., 19 MS, 8 HS, 4 Alt.)
• 10,000 Employees
• District Budget: $858 million
• 3rd in U.S. in Child Poverty Index
• City of Fresno: 1st in U.S. in per capita people age 0-17
Challenges Facing FUSD
• 74% Free or reduced lunch
• 75% Qualify for Title I
• 11.5% Special Education
• 101 Identified languages
• 32% English Learners
• 2,400 Homeless
FUSD Success Stories
• NRT Scores are increasing
• Achievement Gaps are closing
• 64 Schools showing growth on the California Accountability Model– 6 of 8 Comprehensive High Schools– 10 of 15 Middle Schools– 48 of 60 Elementary Schools
The Context
• California State Budget Deficit
• Fresno Unified: $30 million in cuts over past 30 months
• Fresno Unified: An additional $30 million in cuts in the next 18 months
• Two Bond Measures passed since 1998
Student Achievement: 5-Year FSP Goals
• 50% Increase in enrollment in advanced coursework (80% for minority population)
• 20% Increase in successful completion of core coursework (35% for minority population)
• 25% increase in students scoring a 3+ on AP tests in mathematics and science
• Increase in overall achievement test scores• Reduction of the achievement gap between white and
traditionally under-represented groups• 85% of schools will show an increase in the average NCE score
Access to Advanced Mathematics Coursework
0%
10%
20%
30%
Enrollment in Trig., AP Calculus AB/BC & AP Prob/Stat. as a Percentage of 11-12th Grade Population
99-00 7.3% 23.3% 6.5% 23.4%
01-02 9.0% 22.1% 7.1% 24.4%
Afr. Am. Asian Am. Hispanic White
7.6% increase overall (1,194 to 1,285)12.8% increase for minority groups (675 to 762)
Access to Advanced Science Coursework
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Enrollement in Biology AP, Physics AP, Chemistry AP, Env. Sci. AP as a Percentage of 12th Grade Population
99-00 2.8% 6.9% 3.2% 6.4%
01-02 8.4% 15.3% 5.7% 18.8%
Afr. Am. Asian Am. Hispanic White
145% increase overall (174 to 427)128% for minority groups (108 to 246)
Success in Algebra IB Among Middle School Students (Grade of A, B, or C)
59
120
194
340
173
472
375
440
31
45
12
79
49
249
42
154
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Afr Am 99-00
Afr Am 01-02
Asian Am 99-00
Asian Am 01-02
Hispanic 99-00
Hispanic 01-02
White 99-00
White 01-02
A, B or C D, F or Inc.
71.7% increase overall, 115.7% increase for minority groups
Success in Geometry Among High School Students (Grade of A, B, or C)
151
236
594
766
648
999
630
776
162
207
337
403
540
1104
297
373
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Afr Am 99-00
Afr Am 01-02
Asian Am 99-00
Asian Am 01-02
Hispanic 99-00
Hispanic 01-02
White 99-00
White 01-02
A, B or C D, F or Inc.
37.2% increase overall, 43.6% increase for minority groups
Success in Biology Among High School Students (Grade of A, B, or C)
128
284
370
768
550
1117
564
775
101
197
84
202
456
943
197
278
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Afr Am 99-00
Afr Am 01-02
Asian Am 99-00
Asian Am 01-02
Hispanic 99-00
Hispanic 01-02
White 99-00
White 01-02
A, B or C D, F or Inc.
81.8% overall, 107% increase for minority groups
Success in Chemistry Among High School Students (Grade of A, B, or C)
63
101
222
382
142
355
376
500
22
46
49
91
67
191
85
95
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Afr Am 99-00
Afr Am 01-02
Asian Am 99-00
Asian Am 01-02
Hispanic 99-00
Hispanic 01-02
White 99-00
White 01-02
A, B or C D, F or Inc.
66.2% increase overall, 96.3% increase for minority groups
Students Receiving a 3+ Score on a Mathematics/Science Advanced Placement Test
Student Group
2000
2002
% Increased Passing
White 118 of 178 164 of 230 39% African-American 3 of 11 10 of 30 233% Hispanic 15 of 56 36 of 103 140% Asian-American 55 of 133 49 of 181 -11% Total Minority 73 of 200 95 of 214 30% Total (incl. “Not Stated”) 248 of 463 295 of 617 19%
Fresno Unified School District | Research, Evaluation & Assessment
MATH: District Average Stanford 9 Achievement Test Scores By Grade LevelBased On National Percentile Ranks (NPR)
2928
25
28
38
34 34
3836
42
3635
30 30
41
3738
4140
47
4039
3334
44
37
40
44
38
47
3941
3536
47
36
39
44
38
4443
45
3839
50
3836
44
39
44
05
1015202530354045505560
Na
tio
na
l P
erc
en
tile
R
an
k
1998 29 28 25 28 38 34 34 38 36 42
1999 36 35 30 30 41 37 38 41 40 47
2000 40 39 33 34 44 37 40 44 38 47
2001 39 41 35 36 47 36 39 44 38 44
2002 43 45 38 39 50 38 36 44 39 44
1998-2002 Change + 14 + 17 + 13 + 11 + 12 + 4 + 2 + 6 + 3 + 2
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
NOTE: Scores from state file for
Stanford 9 results as provided by
Harcourt Educational Measurement.
Demographics
English Learners (EL)
Economically Disadvantaged
Minority
Special Education
FUSD
32%
73%
81%
10%
Fresno Unified School District | Research, Evaluation & Assessment
SCIENCE: District Average Stanford 9 Achievement Test Scores By Grade LevelBased On National Percentile Ranks (NPR)
33 343635
39 4039 39
42
3937
3939 3840
05
1015202530354045505560
Na
tio
na
l P
erc
en
tile
R
an
k
1998 33 34 36
1999 35 39 40
2000 39 39 42
2001 39 37 39
2002 39 38 40
1998-2002 Change + 6 + 4 + 4
9 10 11
Demographics
English Learners (EL)
Economically Disadvantaged
Minority
Special Education
FUSD
32%
73%
81%
10%
NOTE: Scores from state file for
Stanford 9 results as provided by
Harcourt Educational Measurement.
Comparison of Mathematics CST Scaled Scores: 2002
250
275
300
325
350
California 343 332 332 323 328 320 312 318 318
Fresno 306 296 302 293 308 300 290 287 303
Oakland 316 300 302 299 297 293 279 273 291
Los Angeles 324 317 321 303 301 296 290 287 294
San Bernardino 314 306 311 297 306 300 280 288 283
San Diego 338 329 322 311 322 320 283 291 304
Gr 2 Gr 3 Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Alg. I Geom. Alg. II
Comparison of Science CST Scaled Scores: 2002
250
275
300
325
350
California 334 328 321 314
Fresno 315 308 304 298
Los Angeles 312 310 312 270
Oakland 302 298 NA NA
San Bernardino 304 309 NA NA
San Diego 322 313 290 NA
Biology Chemistry Physics Earth Sci
Average '98 to '02 SAT-9 Mathematics NCE Reduction in Achievement Gap Between Minority and White Groups
-4 -2 0 2 4
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
Gra
de L
evel
Gap Increased AVG NCE Change Gap Reduced
Asian (11,256) 3.4 3.9 5.1 3.5 0.4 1.1 1.1 2.8 1.9 1.5
African Am. (7,419) 3.5 -2.6 0.4 1 -1.2 -0.1 -1.3 1.8 0.5 3.8
Hispanic (31,834) 3.6 2.2 1.1 1.8 0.4 0 0.4 2.8 1.9 0
2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th
Average '98 to '02 SAT-9 Science NCE Reduction in Achievement Gap Between Minority and White Groups
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
9th
10th
11th
Gra
de
Lev
el
Gap Increased AVG NCE Change Gap Reduced
Asian (11,256) 1.1 3.3 3.1
African Am. (7,419) 2.6 2.1 2.9
Hispanic (31,834) 1.9 3.1 3
9th 10th 11th
School Improvement Since 2000
• Between 2000 and 2002, 63 of 89 (71%) Fresno schools have evidenced an increase in the average NCE in mathematics.
• Between 2000 and 2002, 53 of 89 (60%) Fresno school have evidenced an increase of 1.0+ in the average NCE in mathematics.
Connecting Professional Development with Student Achievement
0
1
2
3
4
5
AVG NCE Gain
SAT-9 Grade 3-6 Math NCE Avg Gains by # of PD Hours in 01-02
0 Hours 2.9
1 to 14 Hrs 2.4
15 to 29 Hrs 4.7
30+ Hrs 3.9
1st Qtr
Connecting Professional Development with Student Achievement
294297300303306309312
AVG NCE Gain
Grade 3-6 Math Standards Test Avg Scaled Score by TEKI 2001 Participation
Non-TEKI 300
TEKI Participant 311
Avg Math Scaled Score
Totals for 429 students in classrooms with TEKI graduates, and 20,220 students with non-TEKI teachers
Connecting Teacher Collaboration with Student Achievement
0
2
4
6
AVG NCE Gain
Grade 3-6 Math Avg SAT-9 NCE Gain by Survey Response: "I have time during the regular week to work with my peers on mathematics
curriculum and instruction"
Strongly Disagree 0.4
Disagree 3.4
No Opinion 3.2
Agree 5.5
Avg Math Scaled Score
FSP: Quality of M/S Teaching•Education Leadership •Standards-based alignment between curriculum and instruction
•Reflective practice as an effective coaching strategy•English Learner strategies•Literacy connections •Environmental Education •California Accountability Model•Educational Decisions Based on Data
FSP Increasing the Opportunity to Learn
• Intergenerational tutorial and mentoring programs• After School Programs & Family Nights• Energy Conservation Education Fairs• Summer Academies• District/City Partnership to expand Community
based Science Workshops• Multi-Lingual Parent Education Opportunities
FSP Partnerships
• Collaborative Summer Institutes with IHEs• Teacher preparation partnership• Early induction experiences for future teachers• University content coursework designed for
teachers• University M/S courses for high school students• Masters in Math/Science Education established• Doctorate in Math/Science Education in planning• Research in Math/Science Education
Fresno Systemic Program
National Science Foundation
Fresno Schools –
Making A+ DifferenceFor Every Student, Every Day
Dr Santiago V. Wood, Superintendent