frameworks for the processes & outcomes of msp stephen b. olsen
TRANSCRIPT
Frameworks for the Processes & Outcomes of MSPSimplification in a Context of Complexity
Stephen B. OlsenDirector, The Coastal Resources Center
University of Rhode Island
• Can this complexity be portrayed to – highlight the most essential features of distinct phases?– How best to sequence the many actions?
• Can such frameworks encourage transparency and accountability for all concerned?
• Be applied at a range of spatial scales and socio-political settings?
• And can such frameworks encourage comparison across initiatives and collaborative learning?
Why? For Whom?Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) is
A complex, lengthy process combining science, stakeholder participation and policy making
Often extending over many years
Politically charged, often rich in conflicts
Two Frameworks
The Ecosystem Governance Cycle The Orders of OutcomesWhyHow
Modeled on the learning cycle
• designed to emphasize differences in the nature of each phase
• essential actions associated with each phase
Disaggregate the ultimate goal of sustainable forms of development into a sequence of more tangible outcomes
Ecosystem Governance
EnvironmentalDomain
SocietalDomain
Ecosystem Good & Services
Socio-Environmental Systems
Ecosystem Governance
• How resources or an environment are utilized
• How problems,opportunities are evaluated, analyzed
• What behavior is acceptable or forbidden
• What rules & sanctions are applied to affect how natural resources are distributed and used
Juda and Hennessey, 2007
The formal and informal arrangements, institutions,and mores that structure and influence:
Human Uses of EcosystemsHuman Uses of Ecosystems
Principle Sources and Mechanisms of Governance
Legal/Political Mechanisms
SocialMechanisms
Economic Mechanisms
Market
GovernmentGovernment
Civil SocietyCivil Society
Progressively larger cycles indicate growth in scope GESAMP, 1996
MSP is an Issue‐Driven Process
• MSP research should be directed at the problems and the opportunities (issues) that the plan and policies will address
• Stakeholders and the public engage in MSP when it addresses issues that matter to them
• The perceived importance of individual issues often shifts with each step
Three Categories of Issues forEcosystem Governance
Environmental threats or declines in ecosystem goods and services
Societal needs, desires and conflicts
Weaknesses in the governance system
1
23
Good process does not always generate the anticipated
outcomes!
• Appears when issue analysis, planning, stakeholder involvement, and governmental mandates
DO NOT• Produce the changes in behavior that signal implementation of a policy or plan of action
AND THERFORE DO NOT GENERATE• The anticipated outcomes
The Implementation Gap
The Orders of Outcomes Framework
Assembly of theEnabling ConditionsGoalsConstituenciesCapacityCommitment
Implementation as Changes in BehaviorResource usersInstitutionsInvestments
The HarvestAchievement of Selected Societal and Environmental Goals
The Ultimate GoalSustainable Forms of Ecosystem Development
Time
The Orders of Outcomes
Global
National
Local
First Order:Enabling Conditions
Governmental commitment: authority, funding;
Institutional capacity to implement;
Unambiguous goals;
Constituencies present at local and national levels.
Intermediate OutcomesEnd Outcomes
Second Order:Changed Behavior
Changes in behavior of institutions and stakeholder groups;
Changes in behaviors directly affecting resources of concern;
Changes in investment strategies.
Third Order:Attainment of Program Goals
Some targets for social and/or environmental qualities maintained, restored or improved.
Fourth Order:Sustainable Ecosystem Conditions & Uses
A desirable and dynamic balance between social and environmental conditions is sustained.
Scale
Time
Regional
Source: Olsen et al., 2006
The Four 1st Order Enabling Conditions
• GOALS for specified environmental and societal outcomes
• Supportive and informed CONSTITUENCIESsufficient to generate political will
• COMMITMENTS that provide the necessary authorities and resources for implementation
• The necessary CAPACITY is present within implementing institutions
The Frameworks are a Basis for Monitoring and Evaluation
• Graduated indicators have been developed for each element of the 5 step governance cycle and for each attribute of the 1st, 2nd and 3d Order Outcomes (UNEP, 2006; LOICZ, 2010)
• These indicators can be applied to document baseline conditions and then periodically track progress and adaptation
• Designed as “scorecards,” these can – encourage interdisciplinary engagement– promote a transparent process to stakeholders
Tracking Governance Cycle Actions
Ist Order Preconditions: Goal Definition
Thank [email protected]