fossil vs contemporary carbon at 12 rural and urban sites in the united states bret a. schichtel...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
219 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in
the United Statesthe United States
Bret A. Schichtel (NPS)Bret A. Schichtel (NPS)William C. Malm (NPS)William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL)Graham Bench (LLNL)
Charles E. McDade (UCD)Charles E. McDade (UCD) Judy C. Chow (DRI)Judy C. Chow (DRI)John Watson (DRI)John Watson (DRI)
![Page 2: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Urban & Rural Annual Organic CarbonUrban & Rural Annual Organic CarbonUrban & Rural Annual Organic CarbonUrban & Rural Annual Organic Carbon
Speciated Speciated PM2.5 PM2.5 monitoring monitoring networks:networks:
IMPROVE – Rural sites IMPROVE – Rural sites STN – Urban/suburban STN – Urban/suburban sitessites
![Page 3: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Urban & Rural Annual Organic CarbonUrban & Rural Annual Organic CarbonUrban & Rural Annual Organic CarbonUrban & Rural Annual Organic Carbon
![Page 4: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Carbon Isotope (Carbon Isotope (1414C/C/1212C) NetworkC) Network
Summer: Jun – Aug ‘04; Winter: Dec ’04 – Feb Summer: Jun – Aug ‘04; Winter: Dec ’04 – Feb ‘05 ‘05 Summer: Jun – Aug ‘05; Winter: Dec ’05 – Feb Summer: Jun – Aug ‘05; Winter: Dec ’05 – Feb ‘06 ‘06 Summer: Jul – Aug ‘02Summer: Jul – Aug ‘02
Lake SugemaBrigantine
Proctor MaplePuget Sound
Mt. Rainier
Sula
Rocky Mt.
Grand Canyon
Phoenix
Tonto
Great Smoky Mt.
Yosemite
Six day HI-Six day HI-VOL PM2.5 VOL PM2.5 samplessamples
![Page 5: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Contemporary (Biogenic) Vs Fossil CarbonContemporary (Biogenic) Vs Fossil Carbon
CC1414 half life ~5700 yr half life ~5700 yr ffMM = 0 for fossil C = 0 for fossil C ffMM ~ 1.08 for biogenic C ~ 1.08 for biogenic C Fraction ContemporaryFraction Contemporary
= = ffMM /1.08/1.08 Samples corrected for Samples corrected for
positive organic artifact positive organic artifact on filterson filters
BiogenicAD
SampleM
CC
CCf
195014
14
/
/
Mount Rainier
y = 0.82x
R2 = 0.95
y = 0.18x
R2 = 0.68-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Total Carbon (mg/m3)
Co
nte
mp
ora
ry o
r F
oss
il C
(m
g/m
3)
Contemporary
Fossil
Summer 2004Summer 2004
![Page 6: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Seasonal Contemporary and Fossil C (Seasonal Contemporary and Fossil C (mmg/mg/m33))
The error bars represent the range in six day The error bars represent the range in six day concentrationsconcentrations
![Page 7: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Seasonal Fraction Contemporary CarbonSeasonal Fraction Contemporary Carbon
The error bars represent the fraction The error bars represent the fraction contemporary range contemporary range
![Page 8: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Urban ExcessUrban Excess Puget Sound, WA (Blue) – Mt. Rainier, WA (Red) Puget Sound, WA (Blue) – Mt. Rainier, WA (Red)
Puget Sound fossil carbon is primarily due to local sources Puget Sound fossil carbon is primarily due to local sources during winter and summerduring winter and summer
Summer biogenic carbon is regionally distributedSummer biogenic carbon is regionally distributed ~40% of the winter urban excess is biogenic carbon~40% of the winter urban excess is biogenic carbon
Not all biogenic carbon is “natural”Not all biogenic carbon is “natural”
Summer
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5T
otal
Car
bon
Fos
sil
Bio
geni
c
Car
bo
n (m g
/m3 )
Excess:
1.8 mg/m3
44%
Excess:
1.56 mg/m3
77%
Excess:
0.23 mg/m3
11%
Winter
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
To
tal
Ca
rbo
n
Fo
ssil
Bio
ge
nic
Ca
rbo
n (m g
/m3)
Excess:
4.1 mg/m3
76%
Excess:
2.4 mg/m3
98%
Excess:
1.66 mg/m3
56%
Pu
get
Sou
nd
Mt
Rain
ier
![Page 9: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Urban ExcessUrban ExcessPhoenix, AZ (Blue) – Tonto, AZ (Red)Phoenix, AZ (Blue) – Tonto, AZ (Red)
Phoenix fossil carbon is primarily due to local sources during Phoenix fossil carbon is primarily due to local sources during winter and summerwinter and summer
Summer biogenic carbon is regionally distributedSummer biogenic carbon is regionally distributed About half of the winter urban excess is biogenic carbon About half of the winter urban excess is biogenic carbon
Not all biogenic carbon is “natural”Not all biogenic carbon is “natural”
Summer
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
44.5
5
Tot
alC
arbo
n
Fos
sil
Bio
geni
c
Car
bo
n (m
g/m
3)
Excess:
1.94 mg/m3
45%
Excess:
1.53 mg/m3
81%
Excess:
0.42 mg/m3
17%
Winter
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Tot
alC
arbo
n
Fos
sil
Bio
geni
c
Car
bo
n (m g
/m3 )
Excess:
9.6 mg/m3
89%
Excess:
5.1 mg/m3
94%
Excess:
4.5 mg/m3
84%
Ph
oen
ixT
on
to
![Page 10: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
IMPROVE Fine Particulate CarbonIMPROVE Fine Particulate Carbon
On average HiVol total carbon was 10-20% greater than IMPROVEOn average HiVol total carbon was 10-20% greater than IMPROVE
All monitors were collocated with IMPROVE monitors measuring All monitors were collocated with IMPROVE monitors measuring OC and EC using thermal optical reflectance (TOR)OC and EC using thermal optical reflectance (TOR)
IMPROVE collects 24-hour PM2.5 samples every third dayIMPROVE collects 24-hour PM2.5 samples every third day
y = 1.2x
R2 = 0.50
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 2 4 6 8IMPROVE - TOR (µg/m3)
HiV
ol
- A
MS
(µ
g/m
3)
y = 1.12x
R2 = 0.84
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 2 4 6 8
IMPROVE - TOR (µg/m3)
HiV
ol
- A
MS
(µ
g/m
3)
Total Carbon: Summer
Total Carbon: Winter
![Page 11: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Fraction Biogenic Vs EC/TCFraction Biogenic Vs EC/TC
Summer EC/TCSummer EC/TC Fossil ~ 0.36Fossil ~ 0.36 Biogenic ~ 0.12Biogenic ~ 0.12
Winter EC/TCWinter EC/TC Fossil ~ 0.45Fossil ~ 0.45 Biogenic ~ 0.19Biogenic ~ 0.19
Winter/SummerWinter/Summer Fossil: 1.25Fossil: 1.25 Biogenic: 1.58Biogenic: 1.58
Seasonal AveragesSeasonal Averages
6-Day Averages6-Day AveragesSummer 2004
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2Fraction Biogenic (from C-14)
IMP
RO
VE
EC
/TC
y = -0.21x + 0.35
Winter 2004- '05
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2Fraction Biogenic (from C-14)
IMP
RO
VE
EC
/TC
y = -0.23x + 0.43
Summer 2004
y = -0.24x + 0.36
R2 = 0.77
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Fraction Biogenic (from C-14)
IMP
RO
VE
EC
/TC
Winter 2004-05
y = -0.26x + 0.45
R2 = 0.86
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Fraction Biogenic (from C-14)
IMP
RO
VE
EC
/TC
![Page 12: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
EC/TC Ratios from IMPROVE Data Edge AnalysisEC/TC Ratios from IMPROVE Data Edge Analysis
Rural 10Rural 10thth %-ile edge ~ Biogenic %-ile edge ~ Biogenic EC/TC EC/TC Summer – 0.07Summer – 0.07 Winter – 0.16Winter – 0.16
Urban 90Urban 90thth %-ile edge ~ Fossil EC/TC %-ile edge ~ Fossil EC/TC Summer – 0.41Summer – 0.41 Winter – 0.44Winter – 0.44
IMPROVE Rural Carbon 6/04 - 2/06
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 5 10 15 20 25Total Carbon (µg/m3)
Ele
men
tal
Car
bo
n (
µg
/m3)
EC summer EC winter
IMPROVE Urban Carbon 6/04 - 2/06
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 5 10 15 20 25
Total Carbon (µg/m3)
Ele
men
tal
Car
bo
n (
µg
/m3)
EC summer EC winter
![Page 13: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Measured Primary EC/TC RatiosMeasured Primary EC/TC Ratios Mobile Sources – Fossil CarbonMobile Sources – Fossil Carbon
Adjusted Roadside: EC/TC = 0.39 (Chow et al., 2004)Adjusted Roadside: EC/TC = 0.39 (Chow et al., 2004) 1996 Sepulveda. CA tunnel study: EC/TC = 0.57 (Gillies et al., 2001)1996 Sepulveda. CA tunnel study: EC/TC = 0.57 (Gillies et al., 2001) Light duty vehicle: EC/TC = 0.3 (Cadle et al., 1997)Light duty vehicle: EC/TC = 0.3 (Cadle et al., 1997) Heavy Duty Diesel: EC/TC = 0.63 (Lowenthal et al. 1994)Heavy Duty Diesel: EC/TC = 0.63 (Lowenthal et al. 1994)
Wood Smoke – Biogenic Carbon (McDonald et al., 2000)Wood Smoke – Biogenic Carbon (McDonald et al., 2000) Softwood in fireplace: EC/TC = 0.2Softwood in fireplace: EC/TC = 0.2 Hardwood in fireplace: EC/TC = 0.1Hardwood in fireplace: EC/TC = 0.1 Hardwood in woodstove: EC/TC = 0.11Hardwood in woodstove: EC/TC = 0.11 Texas grass and soft and hardwood: EC/TC = 0.2 (Chow et al., 2004)Texas grass and soft and hardwood: EC/TC = 0.2 (Chow et al., 2004)
CookingCooking EC/TC = 0.1 (Chow et al., 2004)EC/TC = 0.1 (Chow et al., 2004)
Secondary organic aerosolSecondary organic aerosol EC/TC = 0EC/TC = 0
![Page 14: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Comparison of EC/TC estimatesComparison of EC/TC estimates
Projected fossil and biogenic EC/TC ratios are in line with other estimatesProjected fossil and biogenic EC/TC ratios are in line with other estimates Summer Fossil EC/TC ratio is on low side Summer Fossil EC/TC ratio is on low side
Literature summer EC/TC higher than C 12/14 and EC/TC edge analyses Literature summer EC/TC higher than C 12/14 and EC/TC edge analyses Literature examined primary aerosolLiterature examined primary aerosol
Fossil and Biogenic EC/TC is smaller in the summer than the winter indicating Fossil and Biogenic EC/TC is smaller in the summer than the winter indicating some summertime SOA formation for bothsome summertime SOA formation for both
Summer
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Fossil Biogenic
EC
/TC
Rat
io
Carbon 12/14 Edge Analysis Literature
Winter
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Fossil Biogenic
EC
/TC
Rat
io
Carbon 12/14 Edge Analysis Literature
Winter
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Fossil Biogenic
EC
/TC
Rat
io
Carbon 12/14 Edge Analysis Literature
Summer
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Fossil Biogenic
EC
/TC
Rat
io
Carbon 12/14 Edge Analysis Literature
![Page 15: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Fraction Biogenic - Summer 2004-05Fraction Biogenic - Summer 2004-05
The summer (June-August) IMPROVE carbon data were partitioned into fossil and biogenic carbon using the derived fossil and biogenic EC/TC ratios
![Page 16: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Fraction Biogenic - Winter 2004-06Fraction Biogenic - Winter 2004-06
The summer (December - February) IMPROVE carbon data were partitioned into fossil and biogenic carbon using the derived fossil and biogenic EC/TC ratios
![Page 17: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Estimating Secondary Organic Carbon Estimating Secondary Organic Carbon (SOC)(SOC)
Assume:Assume: All elemental carbon is primaryAll elemental carbon is primary Winter organic carbon is Winter organic carbon is primary (PC)primary (PC) Summer organic carbon is pSummer organic carbon is primary + secondaryrimary + secondary
1int
Summer
erW
Summer TCEC
TCEC
PC
SOC
1
1
SOCPCTC
SOC
Summer
1
1
Summer
Summer
Summer TCEC
TCSOC
OC
SOC
![Page 18: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Fraction Secondary Organic Carbon for Fraction Secondary Organic Carbon for Summer MonthsSummer Months
42% of the summertime organic carbon is secondary42% of the summertime organic carbon is secondary 32% of the summertime fossil carbon is secondary32% of the summertime fossil carbon is secondary If some winter organic carbon is secondary than these summer If some winter organic carbon is secondary than these summer
SOC contributions are lower boundsSOC contributions are lower bounds
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
SOC / TC SOC / OC
Fra
ctio
n S
eco
nd
ary
OC Fossil Biogenic
![Page 19: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
SummarySummary Biogenic carbon accounts for Biogenic carbon accounts for
80-95% of the total carbon at the rural sites80-95% of the total carbon at the rural sites 70-80% of total carbon at near urban sites70-80% of total carbon at near urban sites 50% of total carbon at urban sites50% of total carbon at urban sites
Little seasonality and total variation in fraction Little seasonality and total variation in fraction modern carbon modern carbon
Urban fossil carbon is primarily due to local sources Urban fossil carbon is primarily due to local sources during the winter and summerduring the winter and summer
Summer biogenic carbon is regionally distributedSummer biogenic carbon is regionally distributed 40-50% of the winter urban excess is biogenic carbon 40-50% of the winter urban excess is biogenic carbon
Not all biogenic carbon is “natural”Not all biogenic carbon is “natural”
![Page 20: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
SummarySummary
42% or more of the summertime organic 42% or more of the summertime organic carbon is secondarycarbon is secondary
32% or more of the summertime fossil carbon 32% or more of the summertime fossil carbon is secondaryis secondary
![Page 21: Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062516/56649d445503460f94a2112c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Finished