forest water research centre (frc)...1. silviculture and forest science (98 terms) 2. seed...
TRANSCRIPT
Forest Water Research Centre (FRC) Ministry of Nature and the Environment of Mongolia (MNE)
GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCES
ASSESSMENT 2010
MONGOLIA
Country Progress Report:
Recommendation for harmonization and
standardization of MAR terms
PREPARED: BY CHIMIDNYAM DORJSUREN, responsible consultant for
development of recommendations for harmonization/standardization of Monitoring
assessment and reporting terms.
Ulaanbaatar, 2008
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Forest Resources Assessment Program and MAR Terms and Definitions
Forests are a major natural resource on the Earth and crucial for the well being of
humanity. Forests provide a wide range of economic, social, environmental, and
cultural benefits and services to human societies. Precisely, they provide foundations
for life on earth through ecological functions, by regulating the climate and water
resources and by serving as habitats for plants and animals. Forests also furnish a wide
range of essential goods such as wood, food, fodder and medicines, in addition to
opportunities for recreation, spiritual renewal and other services.
Forest resources and lands should be managed sustainably to meet the social,
economic, ecological, cultural and spiritual functions, and the maintenance and
enhancement of biological diversity. Sustainably managed forests have multiple
environmental and socio-economic functions important at the global, national and
local scales, and play a vital part in sustainable development. Reliable and up-to-date
information on the state of forest resources - not only on area and area change, but
also on such variables as growing stock, wood and non-wood products, carbon,
protected areas, use of forests for recreation and other services, biological diversity
and forests contribution to national economies - is crucial to support decision-making
for policies and programs in forestry and sustainable development at all levels.
Today, forests are under pressure from increasing demands for land-based products and
services, which frequently leads to the conversion or degradation of forests into
unsustainable forms of land use. When forests are lost or severely degraded, their
capacity to function as regulators of the environment is also lost, increasing flood and
erosion hazards, reducing soil fertility and contributing to the loss of plant and animal life.
As a result, the sustainable provision of goods and services from forests is jeopardized.
Global forest resources assessments have been carried out by FAO since 1948 that is
practically since FAO was created. The Global Forest Resources Assessment relies on
information provided by the individual countries. FAO, at the request of the member
nations and the world community, regularly monitors the world's forests through the
Forest Resources Assessment Program.
The Last Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 reviewed the forest situation by
the beginning of the new millennium. FRA 2005 have included country-level information
based on existing forest inventory data, regional investigations of land-cover change
processes and a number of global studies focusing on the interaction between people and
forests.
The new FRA 2010 was officially launched during a Technical Meeting of the
National Correspondents to the Global Forest Resources Assessment (FRA 2010) held
in Rome from 3 to 7 March 2008. The 1st meeting of the Task Force for the FRA
2010 Remote Sensing Survey was held in Rome from 4 to 5 March 2008. To date,
175 countries have responded to FAO’s request to officially nominate a national
correspondent.
In a forest resources assessment, definitions draw boundaries around various sets or
subsets of data on the extent, structure or characteristics, stocks, goods, services,
management and use of forest resources. Variations in definitions, however minor,
increase the likelihood of divergent outcomes. Definitions are, therefore, the corner
stone of any information and knowledge system. The definitions draw contextual and
conceptual boundaries around various subsets of a data set as well as around the
elements of the data set as a whole. The usefulness of a definition in any given
context depends on its ability to prevent the rest (subset or elements) from intruding
into the boundary. The description of the parameters of these boundaries constitutes
the definition.
The global forest resource assessment reports have always provided a set of definitions as the basis for their information content. The development of such a set of definitions is necessary for producing compatible information across countries and time and to facilitate harmonization of information with that provided to/by other international agencies and processes.
In order to carry out the forest resource assessment in Mongolia, it is necessary to standardize terms and definitions related to forest management, importance of forests, forest resource and other criteria at the international standard.
Current international terms and set of definitions used in forest resource assessment, haven been developed in 2000 and in 2005. The introduction, adoption and adjustment of these terms and set of definitions are required for forest resource assessment in Mongolia 2010.
This paper presents progress report of National Consultant as a part of country report of
Mongolia for FAO initiated project “Strengthening Monitor Assessment and
Reporting on Sustainable Forest Management (MAR-SFM) in Mongolia
(GCP/INT/988/JPN)”
1.2 Purpose of this document
The purpose of this document:
• To review standardization of Mongolian forest terms and definitions.
• To develop recommendation for harmonization and standardization of MAR terms for Mongolian Forest Resources Assessment 2010.
2. THE REVIEW OF STANDARDIZATION OF MONGOLIAN FOREST TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
Since 1960, Mongolia has translated and adopted forest terms and definitions used in
Russia.
In 1984 the Institute of Forest Research and Project Development of Ministry of
Forestry and Wood Industry developed the definitions on forestry and forest terms for
the first time, which was approved by the desicion No. 382 of the December 30th,
1984 of the State Bureau of the Value and Standard of the Mongolia as Mongolian
State Standard No. UST 9797-84-Forest terms and Definitions.
This standard consists of four parts, which includes a) basic terms, b) planting
material, c) nursery and d) tree planting. This standard contained 79 terms and
definitions related to nursery and tree planting operations both in Mongolian and
Russian languages.
In 1991, this standard was revised and approved as Mongolian State Standard No.
UST 4118-91- “Forest Terms and Definitions”. This standard No. UST 4118-91
consists of 304 forest terms and definitions in Mongolian, Russian and English
languages. This standard consists of following seven parts:
1. Silviculture and forest science (98 terms)
2. Seed production (95 terms)
3. Nursery (19 terms)
4. Afforestation and reforestation (9 terms)
5. Planting materials (10 terms)
6. Tree planting (40 terms)
7. Forest management and forest measuration (33 terms)
Some definitions in the above mentioned standard are given incorrect, as well as
outdated. Therefore, nowadays it is required to revise and update this standard with
modern terms such as sustainability, biodiversity, ecosystem health and integrity, GIS
and more.
Moreover, many English terms are given incorrect. For example (the correct terms are
written in the parentheses):
1. Middle age tree (Middle age stand)
2. Felling strip (Stripe clearcutting).
3. Scribing trees (Nurse tree).
3. RECOMMENDATION FOR HARMONIZATION AND
STANDARDIZATION OF MAR TERMS FOR MONGOLIAN
FOREST RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 2010
Below are materials used for developing a recommendation on standardization united
terms of the assessment and monitoring of the Mongolian forest in 2010.
1. Working Paper 83 of the UN Agricultural Organization called as “Global
Forest Resources Assessment Update 2005. Terms and Definitions (Final
version)”. Rome, 2004
2. Country Report 2010/136 (Rome 2008) called as “Global Forest Resources
Assessment 2010. Mongolia Country Report in the www.fao.org./forestry/fra
Table T1. Extent of Forest and Other wooded land
1.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Category Definition
Forest Land spanning more than 0.5 hectares with trees higher than 5 meters and
a canopy cover of more than 10 percent, or trees able to reach these
thresholds in situ. It does not include land that is predominantly under
agricultural or urban land use.
Other wooded land Land not classified as “Forest”, spanning more than 0.5 hectares; with trees
higher than 5 meters and a canopy cover of 5-10 percent, or trees able to
reach these thresholds in situ; or with a combined cover of shrubs, bushes
and trees above 10 percent. It does not include land that is predominantly
under agricultural or urban land use.
Other land All land that is not classified as “Forest” or “Other wooded land”.
Other land with tree cover
(Subordinated to “Other
land”)
Land classified as “Other land”, spanning more than 0.5 hectares with a
canopy cover of more than 10 percent of trees able to reach a height of 5
meters at maturity.
Inland water bodies Inland water bodies generally include major rivers, lakes and water
reservoirs.
Comments. Mongolian national classification and definitions are as follows:
Тайлбар. Монголын ойн фондын талбайг дараахи байдлаар ангилдаг.
National class Definition
Natural Forest All forest stands with a Relative Stock Density above 0.3 are registered as
natural forests.
Open Forest
All forest stands with a Relative Stock Density less 0.3 are registered as
natural forests.
Non Forest Area in Forest
Land
All non-forest area within forest land which does not support Natural
forests and Open forests, such as hayfield, pasture land, grassland of
mountain, lake, river, marshland, alpine grassland, sand and etc.
Non-forest area should be excluded from forest fund area during the forest inventory.
In the future, international categories and definitions such as Forest, Other wooded
land, Other land and Other land with tree covers should be used in the forest
inventory. Results of latest investigation show that relative stock density of 0.3 is
equal to a canopy cover of 25-30 percent.
1.2 Classification of forest land in Mongolia
Table T2. Forest ownership and management rights
2.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Category Definition
Public ownership Forest owned by the State; or administrative units of the public
administration; or by institutions or corporations owned by the public
administration.
Private ownership Forest owned by individuals, families, communities, private co-
operatives, corporations and other business entities, private
religious and educational institutions, pension or investment funds,
NGOs, nature conservation associations and other private
institutions.
Individuals
(sub-category of Private
ownership)
Forest owned by individuals and families.
Private business entities and
institutions
(sub-category of Private
ownership)
Forest owned by private corporations, co-operatives, companies
and other business entities, as well as private non-profit
organizations such as NGOs, nature conservation associations, and
private religious and educational institutions, etc.
Total area of Forest land (thousand ha) 18291.8
Forestland 16686.9
Non-forestland 1604.9
Closed forest 12887.7
Open 3799.2
Coniferous and deciduous 10465.3
Saxaul forest 2040.9
Sparse stand 2929.7
Burnt forests 289.0
Logged area 189.5
Forest glade 391.0
Shrubs 381.4
Figure 1. Forestland of Mongolia (2002)
Local communities
(sub-category of Private
ownership)
Forest owned by a group of individuals belonging to the same
community residing within or in the vicinity of a forest area. The
community members are co-owners that share exclusive rights and
duties, and benefits contribute to the community development.
Indigenous / tribal
communities
(sub-category of Private
ownership)
Forest owned by communities of indigenous or tribal people.
Other types of ownership Other kind of ownership arrangements not covered by the
categories above. Also includes areas where ownership is unclear
or disputed.
Categories related to the holder of management rights of public forest resources
Public Administration
The Public Administration (or institutions or corporations owned
by the Public Administration) retains management rights and
responsibilities within the limits specified by the legislation.
Individuals/households Forest management rights and responsibilities are transferred from
the Public Administration to individuals or households through
long-term leases or management agreements.
Private institutions
Forest management rights and responsibilities are transferred from
the Public Administration to corporations, other business entities,
private co-operatives, private non-profit institutions and
associations, etc., through long-term leases or management
agreements.
Communities
Forest management rights and responsibilities are transferred from
the Public Administration to local communities (including
indigenous and tribal communities) through long-term leases or
management agreements.
Other form of management
rights Forests for which the transfer of management rights does not
belong to any of the categories mentioned above.
Recommendation. International definitions of forest terms should be directly adopted
in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia. However, according to the Mongolian
Law on Forest, forest resources are the property of the State. Although right of forest
management has various versions. Forest area is possessed to administrative units as
Capital City, Aimag, Soum, District, as well as economic entities and local
communities.
Table T3. Forest designation and management
3.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Term Definition
Primary designated function The primary function or management objective assigned to a management unit
either by legal prescription, documented decision of the landowner/manager, or
evidence provided by documented studies of forest management practices and
customary use.
Protected areas Areas especially dedicated to the protection and maintenance of biological
diversity, and of natural and associated cultural resources, and managed through
legal or other effective means.
Categories of primary designated functions
Production Forest area designated primarily for production of wood, fibre, bio-energy
and/or non-wood forest products.
Protection of soil and water Forest area designated primarily for protection of soil and water.
Conservation of
biodiversity
Forest area designated primarily for conservation of biological diversity.
Includes but is not limited to areas designated for biodiversity conservation
within the protected areas.
Social services Forest area designated primarily for social services.
Multiple use Forest area designated primarily for more than one purpose and where none of
these alone is considered as the predominant designated function.
Other Forest areas designated primarily for a function other than production,
protection, conservation, social services or multiple use.
No / unknown No or unknown designation.
Special designation and management categories
Area of permanent forest
estate (PFE)
Forest area that is designated to be retained as forest and may not be converted
to other land use.
Forest area within
protected areas Forest area within formally established protected areas independently of the
purpose for which the protected areas were established.
Forest area under sustain-
able forest management
To be defined and documented by the country.
Forest area with
management plan
Forest area that has a long-term (ten years or more) documented management
plan, aiming at defined management goals, which is periodically revised.
Recommendation. Utilization Zone Forests (according to the terms of the Mongolian
Law on Forests) should be included in the category of Forests of Primary Designated
function. Special Protected Area Forests, Green Zone Forests, Prohibited Strip Forests
and other protected zone forests (according to the terms of the Mongolian Law on
Forests) should be classified as Protected Forests.
Table T4. Forest characteristics
4.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions*
Term / category Definition
Naturally regenerated forest Forest predominantly composed of trees established through
natural regeneration.
Introduced species A species, subspecies or lower taxon, occurring outside its natural
range (past or present) and dispersal potential (i.e. outside the
range it occupies naturally or could occupy without direct or
indirect introduction or care by humans).
Characteristics categories
Primary forest Naturally regenerated forest of native species, where there are no
clearly visible indications of human activities and the ecological
processes are not significantly disturbed.
Other naturally regenerated
forest
Naturally regenerated forest where there are clearly visible
indications of human activities.
Other naturally regenerated
forest of introduced species
(sub-category)
Other naturally regenerated forest where the trees are
predominantly of introduced species.
Planted forest Forest predominantly composed of trees established through
planting and/or deliberate seeding.
Planted forest of introduced
species (sub-category)
Planted forest, where the planted/seeded trees are predominantly
of introduced species.
Special categories
Rubber plantations Forest area with rubber tree plantations.
Mangroves Area of forest and other wooded land with mangrove vegetation.
Bamboo Area of forest and other wooded land with predominant bamboo
vegetation.
Comments and recommendations. In Mongolia characteristics categories, such as
“Other naturally regenerated forest of introduced species”, “Rubber plantations”,
“Mangroves” and “Bamboo” are absent. Thus, in case of Mongolia, following
reclassification of characteristics categories is recommended: 1. “Primary forest”, 2.
“Naturally regenerated forest” and 3. “Planted forest”.
Table T5. Forest establishment and reforestation
5.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Term Definition
Afforestation Establishment of forest through planting and/or deliberate
seeding on land that, until then, was not classified as forest.
Reforestation Re-establishment of forest through planting and/or deliberate
seeding on land classified as forest.
Natural expansion of forest Expansion of forests through natural succession on land that, until
then, was under another land use (e.g. forest succession on land
previously used for agriculture).
Comments and recommendations: International classifications and definitions can
be directly adopted in the forest resources assessment 2010 in Mongolia. In Mongolia,
natural expansion of forest is widely observed near to the forest wall.
.
Table T6. Growing stock
6.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Category Definition
Growing stock Volume over bark of all living trees more than X cm in diameter at
breast height (or above buttress if these are higher). Includes the stem
from ground level or stump height up to a top diameter of Y cm, and
may also include branches to a minimum diameter of W cm.
Growing stock of
commercial species
Growing stock (see def. above) of commercial species.
Recommendation. International classification and definitions of forest terms can be
directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
Table T7. Biomass stock
7.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions*
Category Definition
Above-ground biomass All living biomass above the soil including stem, stump, branches, bark,
seeds, and foliage.
Below-ground biomass All biomass of live roots. Fine roots of less than 2mm diameter are
excluded because these often cannot be distinguished empirically from soil
organic matter or litter.
Dead wood All non-living woody biomass not contained in the litter, either standing,
lying on the ground, or in the soil. Dead wood includes wood lying on the
surface, dead roots, and stumps larger than or equal to 10 cm in diameter or
any other diameter used by the country.
Recommendation. International classification and definitions of forest terms can be
directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
Table T8. Carbon stock
8.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Category Definition
Carbon in above-ground
biomass
Carbon in all living biomass above the soil, including stem, stump,
branches, bark, seeds, and foliage.
Carbon in below-ground
biomass
Carbon in all biomass of live roots. Fine roots of less than 2 mm
diameter are excluded, because these often cannot be distinguished
empirically from soil organic matter or litter.
Carbon in dead wood Carbon in all non-living woody biomass not contained in the litter,
either standing, lying on the ground, or in the soil. Dead wood
includes wood lying on the surface, dead roots, and stumps larger
than or equal to 10 cm in diameter or any other diameter used by the
country.
Carbon in litter Carbon in all non-living biomass with a diameter less than the
minimum diameter for dead wood (e.g. 10 cm), lying dead in various
states of decomposition above the mineral or organic soil.
Soil carbon Organic carbon in mineral and organic soils (including peat) to a
specified depth chosen by the country and applied consistently
through the time series.
Recommendation. International classification and definitions of forest terms can be
directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
Table T9. Forest fires
9.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Category Definition
Number of fires Average number of vegetation fires per year in the country.
Area affected by fire Average area affected by vegetation fires per year in the country.
Vegetation fire
(supplementary term)
Any vegetation fire regardless of ignition source, damage or benefit.
Wildfire Any unplanned and/or uncontrolled vegetation fire.
Planned fire A vegetation fire regardless of ignition source that burns according to
management objectives and requires limited or no suppression action.
Recommendation. International classification and definitions of forest terms can be
directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
Table T10. Other disturbances affecting
forest health and vitality
10.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Term Definition
Disturbance Damage caused by any factor (biotic or abiotic) that adversely affects the
vigour and productivity of the forest and which is not a direct result of
human activities.
Invasive species Species that are non-native to a particular ecosystem and whose
introduction and spread cause, or are likely to cause, socio-cultural,
economic or environmental harm or harm to human health.
Category Definition
Disturbance by insects Disturbance caused by insect pests.
Disturbance by diseases Disturbance caused by diseases attributable to pathogens, such as bacteria,
fungi, phytoplasma or virus.
Disturbance by other biotic
agents
Disturbance caused by biotic agents other than insects or diseases, such as
wildlife browsing, grazing, physical damage by animals, etc.
Disturbance caused by abiotic
factors
Disturbances caused by abiotic factors, such as air pollution, snow, storm,
drought, etc.
Recommendation. International classification and definitions of forest terms can be
directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
Table T11. Wood removals and value of removals
11.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Category Definition
Industrial roundwood
removals
The wood removed (volume of roundwood over bark) for production of goods and
services other than energy production (woodfuel).
Woodfuel removals
The wood removed for energy production purposes, regardless whether for
industrial, commercial or domestic use.
Recommendation. International classification and definitions of forest terms can be
directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
Table T12. Non-wood forest products removals
and value of removals
12.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Term Definition
Non-wood forest product
(NWFP)
Goods derived from forests that are tangible and physical objects of
biological origin other than wood.
Value of NWFP removals For the purpose of this table, value is defined as the market value at the site
of collection or forest border.
Recommendation. International classification and definitions of forest terms can be
directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
Table T13. Employment
13.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Category Definition
Full-time equivalents
(FTE)
A measurement equal to one person working full-time during a specified
reference period.
Employment Includes all persons in paid employment or self-employment.
Paid employment Persons who during a specified reference period performed some work for
wage or salary in cash or in kind.
Self-employment Persons who during a specified reference period performed some work for
profit or family gain in cash or in kind (e.g. employers, own-account workers,
members of producers' cooperatives, contributing family workers).
Recommendation. International classification and definitions of forest terms can be
directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
Table T14. Policy and legal framework
14.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Term Definition
Forest policy A set of orientations and principles of actions adopted by public authorities in
harmony with national socio-economic and environmental policies in a given
country to guide future decisions in relation to the management, use and
conservation of forest and tree resources for the benefit of society.
Forest policy
statement
A document that describes the objectives, priorities and means for implementation
of the forest policy.
National forest
programme (nfp)
A generic expression that refers to a wide range of approaches towards forest policy
formulation, planning and implementation at national and sub-national levels. The
national forest programme provides a framework and guidance for country-driven
forest sector development with participation of all stakeholders and in consistence
with policies of other sectors and international policies.
Law (Act or Code)
on forest
A set of rules enacted by the legislative authority of a country regulating the access,
management, conservation and use of forest resources.
Recommendation. International classification and definitions of forest terms can be
directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
Table T15. Institutional framework
15.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Term Definition
Minister responsible for
forest policy-making
Minister holding the main responsibility for forest issues and the formulation of
the forest policy.
Head of Forestry The Head of Forestry is the Government Officer responsible for implementing
the mandate of the public administration related to forests.
Level of subordination Number of administrative levels between the Head of Forestry and the Minister.
University degree Qualification provided by University after a minimum of 3 years of post
secondary education.
Recommendation. International classification and definitions of forest terms can be
directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
Table T16. Education and research
16.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Term Definition
Forest-related education Post-secondary education programme with focus on forests and related subjects.
Doctor’s degree (PhD) University (or equivalent) education with a total duration of about 8 years.
Master’s degree (MSc) or
equivalent
University (or equivalent) education with a total duration of about five years.
Bachelor’s degree (BSc)
or equivalent
University (or equivalent) education with a duration of about three years.
Technician certificate or
diploma
Qualification issued from a technical education institution consisting of 1 to 3
years post secondary education.
Publicly funded forest
research centers
Research centers primarily implementing research programmes on forest
matters. Funding is mainly public or channelled through public institutions.
Recommendation. International classification and definitions of forest terms can be
directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
Table T17. Public revenue collection and expenditure
17.1 FRA 2010 Categories and definitions
Category Definition
Forest revenue All government revenue collected from the domestic production and trade of
forest products and services. For this purpose, forest products include:
roundwood; sawnwood; wood-based panels; pulp and paper; and non-wood forest
products. As far as possible, this should include revenue collected by all levels of
government (i.e. central, regional/provincial and municipal level), but it should
exclude the income of publicly owned business entities.
Public expenditure All government expenditure on forest related activities (further defined below).
Operational expenditure
(sub-category to Public
expenditure)
All government expenditure on public institutions solely engaged in the forest
sector. Where the forest administration is part of a larger public agency (e.g.
department or ministry), this should only include the forest sector component of
the agency’s total expenditure. As far as possible, this should also include other
institutions (e.g. in research, training and marketing) solely engaged in the forest
sector, but it should exclude the expenditure of publicly owned business entities.
Transfer payments All government expenditure on direct financial incentives paid to non-
(sub-category to Public
expenditure)
government and private-sector institutions, enterprises communities or
individuals operating in the forest sector to implement forest related activities.
Domestic funding
Public expenditure funded from domestic public financial resources, including:
retained forest revenue; forest-related funds; and allocations from the national
budget (i.e. from non-forest sector public revenue sources).
External funding
Public expenditure funded from grants and loans from donors, non-governmental
organisations, international lending agencies and international organisations,
where such funds are channelled through national public institutions.
Recommendation. International classification and definitions of forest terms can be
directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
CONCLUSION
1) It is necessary to systematically revise and renew the standard of the
Mongolian forest terms and definitions. These terms and definitions should be
defined in Mongolian, Russian and English languages.
2) It is necessary to organize a research team consisting of leading scholars and
specialists of research institutions for revising and renewing the standard of
forest terms and definitions. 3) Non-forest area should be excluded from forest fund area during the forest
inventory. In the future, international categories and definitions such as Forest,
Other wooded land, Other land and Other land with tree covers should be used
in the forest inventory.
4) Results of latest investigation show that relative stock density of 0.3 is equal to
a canopy cover of 25-30 percent.
5) International classification and definitions of forest terms in Table T2 of FRA
2010 can be directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in Mongolia.
However, according to the Mongolian Law on Forest, forest resources are the
property of the State. Although right of forest management has various
versions. Forest area is possessed to administrative units as Capital City,
Aimag, Soum, District, as well as economic entities and local communities.
6) In the table 3 of FRA 2010, Utilization Zone Forests (according to the terms of
the Mongolian Law on Forests) should be included in the category of Forests
of Primary Designated function. Special Protected Area Forests, Green Zone
Forests, Prohibited Strip Forests and other protected zone forests (according to
the terms of the Mongolian Law on Forests) should be classified as Protected
Forests.
7) In the tables T4-T17 of FRA 2010 international classification and definitions
of forest terms can be directly adopted in Forest Resources Assessment in
Mongolia.
Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Forest Water Research Centre (FWRC) Ministry of Nature and the Environment of Mongolia (MNE)
MONGOLIA
Study work report
methodologies and tools for harmonized Monitoring assessment
PREPARED: BY JAMSRAN TSOGTBAATAR,
responsible consultant for development methodologies and tools for
harmonized Monitoring assessment
Ulaanbaatar, 2008
Strengthening Monitor, Assessment and Reporting on Sustainable Forest
Management in Mongolia
1. Criteria and Indicators Sustainable Forest Management in Mongolia
Management of forest resources in Mongolia suffers from several weaknesses such as
unregulated use, overuse, and inadequate protection. The impacts of human
interference have resulted in deforestation and forest degradation. According to a
survey of human impact on ecosystem in Mongolia during the last hundred years, it is
seen that some 40% of all forests in Mongolia have been impacted at some level
The important causes of deforestation and forest degradation are fire, overgrazing,
mining activity, improper commercial logging, illegal collection of wood for
construction and for use as fuel, hay making in forest steppes, complacency in
enforcement of forest rules and regulations, and damage by pests and diseases. Forest
fires, by far, have had the most serious impact on the forests of Mongolia.
Summarizing the Mongolian situation, collocation of existing objectives, state of
relations, measures and proposed efforts has been made for 8 criteria and 51
indicators.
The set of National Level Criteria and indicators for sustainable Forest Management
of Mongolia has been indicated in below as:
Criteria 1. Increase in the Extent of Forest and Tree Cover
Criteria 2. Increase in the Extent of Forest and Tree Cover Criterion
Criteria 3. Conservation and Maintenance of Soil and water Resources
Criteria 4. Maintenance and Enhancement of Ecosystem Function and Vitality
Criteria 5. Maintenance and Enhancement of Forest Productivity
Criteria 6. Optimization of Forest Resource Utilization
Criteria 7. Maintenance and Enhancement of Social, Cultural and Spiritual Benefits
Criteria 8. Adequacy of Policy, Legal and Institutional Framework
Is Mongolian Forestry sustainable? Mongolian forestry is generally characterized by
multiple protection function of forest resources, in which considerations are made in
relation to increasing demand of environmental protection.
51 criteria are given which can be used to measure the development of Sustainable
Forest Management. It is the entire effect of specific initiatives in relation to all the
criteria as a whole, which determines whether the development is sustainable.
2. Evaluation of effectiveness of existing MAR-SFM in Mongolia
Is existing MAR-SFM in Mongolia effective? In relation with this question on MAR-
SFM system effectiveness the analysis of each indicators of SFM in Mongolia has
been conducted and as examples evaluation of the indicators of first 3 criterions are
shown in below table.
Effectiveness rate
Indicators 1 (low) 2 (medium) 3 (high) 4 (very high )
1.1.Area and
type of
natural forests
1.2 Forest
area under
fragile
ecosystem
1.3 Area
dense and
degraded
forest
1.4 Forest in
non-forest
area
1.5 Area rich
in NWFP
species
1.6 Forest
area destroyed
by mining
1.7
Community
managed
forest areas
2.1 Area of
protected and
fragmented
ecosystems
2.2 Number
of rare,
endangered
threatened
and endemic
species
2.3 Level of
richness and
diversity
2.4 Canopy
cover
2.5 Medicinal
and aromatic
plants and
other NWFPs
2.6 Level of
non-
destructive
harvesting
3.1 Soil
moisture
3.2 Soil
compaction
3.3 Status of
erosion
3.4 Run-off
3.5 Soil pH
3.6 Soil
organic
carbon
3.7 Nutrient
status of soil
3.8 Soil
flora,fauna
and microbes
3.9 Level of
waste
3.10 Sediment
load
3.11 Areas
and watershed
forests
3.12 Level of
permafrost
Effectiveness of other indicators has been conducted and it will be illustrated in final
report of the project.
3. Development of national standardized MAR in linkage with international
process
At the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janerio
in 1992, forestry became on of the most central themes. It was emphasized that forests
and the development of forests are a matter of international interest and that all
countries must take an effort to ensure that all forests are being sustainably managed.
The Mongolian Government intends to make a comprehensive statement as to how
Mongolia can contribute to implementation of the principles of the Forest Declaration
concerning management, conservation and sustainable development of the forests –
nationally as well as internationally.
In order to supervise development and thereby check whether political and
administrative measures function as intended, it is necessary to select and monitor a
number of measurable and representative indicators related to each criterion. Some
criteria are best described by preparing final report.
Several factors must be taken into consideration when selecting indicators of SFM:
•• The indicator must be measurable and must be derived from measurable
entities
•• The indicator must be clearly relevant to the individual criterion and measure
•• The number of indicators and the frequency of measuring and monitoring
must be considered in relation to financial and technical resources
•• Standardized measurement methods must be used when monitoring the
indicators, to enable the comparison of measurements from different times
•• The indicators must be simple and easily comprehensible to the monitoring
For each criteria of the Sustainable Forest Management in Mongolia, the relevant
corresponding parts of the main international agreements concerning forests have
been identified. These international agreements related to Sustainable Forest
management are:
•• UNCED Forest Declaration
•• Agenda 21,
•• Convention on Biodiversity Conservation
•• Convention on Combating Desertification
•• Convention on Climate Change
•• Others.
Forestry Department
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Forest Water Research Centre (FWRC)
Ministry of Nature and the Environment of Mongolia (MNE)
GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCES
ASSESSMENT 2010
MONGOLIA
Report: capabilities of National network for Monitoring assessment and
reporting.
PREPARED: BY DUGERJAV ENEBISH, to conduct assessment on needs and
capabilities of National network for Monitoring assessment and reporting
on Monitoring Assessment Reporting on Sustainable forest management.
Ulaanbaatar, 2008
Executive Summary
Mongolian's forest landscapes and its biodiversity are threatened by biotic
(insects, illegal logging, poaching) and abiotic factors (fire). If the threats are not
contained in the near future, the result will be a significant reduction of the total forest
cover. Investments in the forestry sector have the chance to introduce the concept of
sustainable forest management but will initially face low return rates.
The Mongolian forestry and wood industry sector underwent a collapsed in
1991. At present, a mostly informal (and highly illegal) forest and wood economy is
operating across all sectors and all stakeholders concerned with forest areas.
The existing data gathered over the decades is either incomplete or
inconsistent. The institutions responsible for forest management lack either the
professional capacity to address modern data-collecting methods or are still in a state
of being established. The new
Mongolian Forestry Law (2007) indicates significant progress, since an
important paradigm shift from state forest management towards private and
community-based forest management has been advocated. However, the necessary
by-laws are currently in the formulation process.
The biographical conditions and natural disturbance regimes in the forests are
a challenge for any large scale commercial forest management in Mongolia. Frequent
forest fires and insect outbreaks, mostly as secondary agents, cause potentially great
losses to future forest managers and Forest Management Plans.
A need for a national master plan on land-use and protected area
management is absolutely necessary.
The current forest inventory provides data at the regional level at a map scale
of 1:50,000. This data is suitable for forest reconnaissance surveys at provincial and
district level. For the new forest tenure by private entities, communities, and districts,
newly adapted forest inventories and planning is needed.
Although the technical skills of the Mongolian foresters have improved over the
last years, improved training is lacking.
The best approach is to find a solution to the problem in the forestry sector is to
promote the introduction of an integrated sustainable forest management system that
takes into consideration ecological, economic, and social consequences. This is a
holistic concept which will need to address the range of problems simultaneously.
The key issues are:
- An improvement of the regulatory framework in the forestry sector,
- Adaptation of forest inventory survey and sampling designs to the information needs
and available budgets of the holders of forest tenure,
- Adaptation of forest management planning for the size and the objectives of forest
management units,
- A general improvement of forest inventory technology,
- The promotion of natural forest regeneration instead of forest plantation,
- Adapted silviculture focusing on thinning operations to increase the resilience of
forests stands against frequent fires,
- Improved legal compliance monitoring, incl. the definition of legality,
- Introduction of ecological monitoring within the framework of a continuous forest
inventory system,
- Introduction of third-part certification concepts,
- Creation of new markets by introducing bio-fuel facilities that will create a demand
for thinning material from forests.
Modern concepts like biophysical mapping and Decision Support Systems
(DSS) are desirable but face the general problem of a low return on investments. Such
new methods could be financed by Research and Development projects
Ambitious and unrealistic development objectives as well as project designs will
complicate the implementation and supervision. Effective stakeholder representation
in decision making and in validating results is important to the success of public-
private partnerships. Institutional capacity analysis should be focused-on and
broadened.
Chronic problems that persist in the environmental sector over long periods of
time should result in analytical work.
Current status of Monitoring assessment and Reporting on Sutainable Forest
Management in Mongolia
First time there was Forestry department in Food and Agricultural Ministry.
Foundation of Forestry activities began to taken in Forest of Mongolia. Until 1990
there was established complex of forestry units and organizations in each forest
covered provinces of Mongolia
Since 1990 Mongolia has moved to market economy therefore forestry
sectors destroyed.
Legal frame of Government Administration Monitoring System
� Constitutional Law of Mongolia
� Decree number 38 of Great Khural dated on 1996
� Government Law of Mongolia (1993)
� Government Monitoring and Inpection law (2003)
� Law of Administration and Financing of Government Organizations(2003)
� Government action program
� Rule of Monitoring and Analyzing of Government organizations
� Rule of Monitoring and Analysing of Local Government Organizations
Monitoring and assessment system was established in government
organization. However there is not specific monitoring and assessment system in
forestry sector of Mongolia.
Monitoring and reporting system was focused on Local government and local
Environmental organizations. Still forestry specialists are not enough in local level,
therefore forest monitoring system only based on forest inventory survey. NFI
frequency is 16 years in Mongolia.
Since 1990 Monitoring and Inspection system has established at Ministry of
Nature and Environment.
Monitoring and Reporting System of Ministry of Nature and
Environment
� Scientific Monitoring Department 1990-1996
� Natural Disaster Monitoring Department 1996-2000
� Environmental State Monitoring and Assessment Department
� Nothing 2004-2006
� 2006-2008 Information Monitoring and Assessment Department of MNE
Forestry Sector structure and system was related to Ministry of Nature and
Environment in last 12 years
� Government Implementing Agency of Nature, Forest and Water Resource in
1996-2004
� Forestry Department of Agency of Nature, Forest and Water Resource in
2004-2006
� Forest Policy Division of Ministry of Nature and Environment in 2006-2008
� Government Implementing agency Forest Authority in 2008
Forest and Water Research Center has been working under the management of MNE.
The Forest and Water Research Center is professional organization to conduct
nationwide forest inventory and create forest resource database using the new
advanced technology and science based tools of forest resource maintaining in order
to provide government and public organizations with updated forest information on
forest state of the country.
The main activities of the country focused on:
• Develop short and long term plan of Sustainable forest management based on
forest inventory datas.
• Conduct forest insect and pest controlling by preventing harmful insect attack in
some forest areas.
• Establish seed orchard using plus mother trees and develop tree breeding
technology and using and qualified seed sources.
The organization has 4 sections following:
1. Forest inventory section
2. Forest insect and pest controllingp section
3. Tree breeding and nursery section
4. Tree seed laboratory
There are Environmental office under the management of Local Government, Whis
has been working 10 years. There is only one specialist of forestry in each office of 22
provinces. Fifty percent of them has background of forestry. Their working duties are:
1/ managing forestry activities under the Resoultions adn laws of Forestry.
2/ managing issues of Forestry National Programme, Desertification National
Programme, Programme of Protectingn rare plants of Mongolia, Green Wall National
Programme
3/ to organize training of sustainable development of local forestry
4/ Forest resourceinformation and reports
5/ Monitoring Forest User group activities, forest utilization status, master plan
of forest mangement
Local Environmental office prepare forest resource informations and reports.
However they don’t have enought capacity to prepare forest resource status
information and reports
The main subject of Sustainable Forest Management is Special Protected Area
Departments. About 20 percent of Forest cover is located in Protected areas of
Mongolia.
Forest policy decision followers are Forest User Groups. Currently Mongolia
has 200 Forest User Groups in local level. The most of it’s area needs to be protect
and rehabilitated.
There are about 100 forestry related enterprises with the professional certificates.
Current Institutions
The institutional framework has been analyzed (Badarch 2008). The major
organizations responsible for forest inventory, forest management, forest protection
(fire, insects) and monitoring of harvesting operations are the:
- Ministry of Nature and Environment (MNE)
- State Special Investigation Agency (SSIA)
- Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI)
- National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA)
- Forest and Water Research Center (FWRC)
Until recently, there existed no forest administration at the national, regional or
local level. This has been changed in 2008. The MNE Order No. 226 has approved
the charter, program structure and staffing of the new Mongolian National Forest
Agency (NFA). The staff will consist of 25 persons. The agency director reports to the
MNE and supervises the National Forestry Program Secretariat, the Forest Expedition
and Research Center (FERC; previously Forest and Water Research Center), the
Forestry Department at the Provincial Environmental Agency and its Forest Units at
the district level. The agency director is responsible for policies and forestry politics.
The vice-director supervises three departments: a) forest management, b)
afforestation & the green wall program, and c) staff and finance.
Improvement of forest area and reforestation
Status of the last 5 years /thousands MNT/
Activities 2004 2005 2006 2007 Ä¿í 2008 total
From the state
budget
6358.6 1787 1714.1 3997 13856.7 8000.0 21856.7
From the local
budget
1334.8 786.7 199.7 263 2584.2 2584.2
From the business
entities
1842.7 823.0 2242.7 1871.0 6779.4 2500.0 9279.4
From foreign
investment
325.0 1155.5 439.5 150.0 2070.0 2070.0
Green belt national
program
307.0 430.0 260.0 997.0 265.0 1262.0
Refo
resta
tio
ns a
nd a
ffore
sta
tio
ns
Total 9861.1 4859.2 5026.0 6541.0 26287.3 37052.3
Forest restoration activities has following stages
- Planned areas should be identified in each province
- Announcing a tender to select reforestation work organizations of local level
from the Province Environmental Agencies.
- To establish contract or letter of agreement and send to Ministry of Nature
and Environment
- Under the letter of agreement first fund should be granted
- Reforestation work achievement monitoring activities should be done by
Temporary Reforestation Commission
- Monitoring inventory should be done by Ministry of Nature and Environment
- After the monitoring of reforestation work final fund will be granted
- During the coniferous tree reforestation activity cycle is only one year.
Therefore in next years plantation results could not satisfy for forest growth.
- In the future Mongolia’s reforestation monitoring period must be more than 3
years.
Local Environmental agencies has been monitoring the reforestation activities and
sending the reports to Ministry of Nature and Environment.
Forest protection
Forest insect combating activities
Activities 2004 2005 2006 2007 Ä¿í 2008 Ä¿í
Forest insect
exploration /thous.ha/
500.0 600.0 217.1 897.6 2214.7 1200.0 3414.7
Forest insect
combating /thous.ha/
500.0 600.0 217.1 897.6 2214.7 1200.0 3414.7
-To identify forest insect combating area based on exploration result
-To announce a tender of forest insect exploration and combating to select
organization and professionals.
-To establish a contract or letter of agreement
-First fund will be granted under the letter of agreement
-Forest insect combating commission should do the monitoring of forest insect
combating result
-After the insect combat works final fund will be granted from the Ministry of
Nature and Environment.
Forest Inventory
The forest is divided into compartments based on topographic features as
natural boundaries (aspect, ridge, creeks). The compartments are divided into sub-
compartments (average area approx. 100 ha) and delineated by main timber
species, average diameter, and age class. For each sub-compartment the species
composition, diameter distribution, standing timber volume, natural/artificial
regeneration, damage (fire, insects), and NTFPs – in some inventory projects – are
recorded. Until now the characteristics were estimated by ocular inspection.
Prior to each forest inventory, a sample plot is delineated and all trees are
sampled. This exercise is intended as a "calibration" of the forest inventory
team in order to define which volume tables and site indices should be used for the
inventory of the region.
The forest inventory and the forest management planning have to be done
every ten years according to the Mongolian Law of Forest (2007)
The following information hast to be entered in the forest inventory survey form:
- Forest structure
- Dominating and co-dominating tree species
- Age, site class, density
- Average height, diameter
- Typical features, soil
- Commodity class
- Regeneration, plant cover, shrubs
- Forest activities to be executed in each sub-compartment
The forest inventory results are grouped into the following categories:
- Site table
- Forest volume table
- Age group distribution
- Area and forest condition distribution
- Age class table
- Fire hazard
- Thinning, cleaning, and cutting
- Sanitary cutting
- Final harvest cutting
- Reforestation and regeneration activities
- Record of measurements
The available maps are aerial photographs from the 1960s to 1980s. Recently
remote sensing data is used (e.g., Landsat, Spot, Aster) since GIS workstations have
been procured by the FWRC.
The following maps are produced:
- Forest stand map (scale 1:50 000)
- Green zones are indicated on the (new) forest stand maps
The forest inventory is conducted in all areas according to the same procedures.
There currently exists no distinction between national, regional, or local forest
inventories. The accumulated inventory results provide the data for the national forest
information. The frequency of the "national" forest inventory is set at 10 years.
At the moment, the frequency ranges in average at approximately 16 years.
The reasons are a lack of forest inventory survey crews as well as no adapted design
for a national forest inventory.
Species composition of Mongolia’s Forest
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Are
a 10
00
hec
atar
es
larc
hpi
ne
ceda
r fir
abie
s
birc
h
popu
lus
popl
ar
willow
ulm
us
shru
bs
saxa
ul
Forests
Source: Forest resource of Mongolia, Forest and water research Centre 2007
Forest utilizations and operations
Until the 1940s, the majority of harvesting in Mongolia was done under
selective cutting systems (within deciduous forests) without any formal forest
management planning.
The scale of the logging operations was small, since it was only needed for
subsistence purposes (fire wood, chorals) or smaller "wood-constructions" (houses).
Horses and yaks were mainly used in skidding operations; consequently, residual
damage was relatively low. Under the increasing Soviet influence, clear-cutting
systems have predominated in coniferous forests. Timber harvesting technologies
have traditionally followed Russian systems. Wholetree
logging has been common with skidding by tracked vehicles to roadsides and
transport to landings by truck. The logging activities around so-called forest villages
and gulags (prison camps) had been very intense.
Today, Mongolia is slowly implementing changes to logging methods including a shift
from clear-cutting to selective logging in larch and pine forests. All forest harvesting is
licensed by the governors of each district. In theory licenses are only issued after
considering the economic efficiency of proposed activities, cutting techniques and
processing technology, the level of utilization, and funding reserved for the protection
and regeneration of forests.
Unfortunately, illegal (logging) activities are rampant in many forested areas of
Mongolia. A national code of practice for forest harvesting with assistance from the
International Labor Organisation (ILO)17 and FAO18 was formulated. Such guidelines
form the basis by which to enhance the social dialogue and forestry work. The code is
a practical guide to environmental care in forest harvesting and worker safety and
welfare, but does not mean a
collection of the unrealistic, complex laws used in industrialized countries. The benefit
of the code for forest work must be so realistic and understandable and with an
acceptable cost level that at this stage of national development the wood harvesters
can readily accept the code and follow it. The code provides documentation to
companies selling or using wood to prove that all wood sold does indeed come from
authorized sources. Until now, this Code of Forest
Practices or Best Practices Guidelines for forest operations has not been
implemented.