for a better built environment 1 council for built environment 22november 2013 presented by gugu...
TRANSCRIPT
For a better built environment1
Council for Built
Environment
22November 2013Presented by Gugu Mazibuko
Email: [email protected]
For a better built environment2
BACKGROUND TO THE CBEThe CBE is a statutory Entity established by Council for the Built Environment Act 43 of 2000
The Act mandates the CBE to oversee and coordinate the activities of the six professional councils regulating professions namely; engineering, architecture, quantity surveying, project and construction management, property valuers and landscape architecture
The CBE started its operations in 2002
The CBE is governed by a 20 member Council/Board appointed by Minister of Public Works & has 26 staff members & 4 divisions – Skills, Research & Policy, Corporate Services, Legal
In terms of section 55 of the PFMA the Council is the Accounting Authority directly accountable to the Executive Authority (Minister of Public Works)
For a better built environment3
Functions and powers of the CBE
The CBE and Professional Councils have 13 concurrent functions delegated to them by the Act, and these are:
Identification of Work Guideline Professional Fees Continuous Professional Development Accreditation of Built Environment Programmes Code of Conduct for the Professions Professional Registration Recognition of Voluntary Associations Recognition of New Professions International Agreements Recognition of Prior Learning Standard Generating Appeals and Tribunals Competency Standards for Registrations
To ensure consistency in application of these functions and related policies across the six Councils, the CBE develops Policy Frameworks on these functions
For a better built environment4
The South African Development Context and Environment –drivers of infrastructure demand & built environment skills
11
Social transformation infrastructure:Housing, EducationHealth, Municipal
Economic infrastructure:
Agric, Tourism, Entrep. Mining, Manufacturing
Enabling infrastructure:
Transport, water, energy, communications
Under resourced municipalities – 159
50% backlogs,67% poverty
Secondary municipalities –119
32% backlogs,41% poverty
6 Metros18% backlogs, 23% poverty
Poverty 40%, Backlogs 22%, Unemployment approx. 20%
Infrastructure investment needs
Drivers for infrastructure investments
Government / DFIs
Municipalities & DPW SOEs Private Sector
Main delivery channels
ConstraintsMarket failure / weaknesses:
Funding gap / availability of finance
Institutional failure / weaknesses:Capacity and skills
Absorption capacity - Revenue11
Source: DBSA
For a better built environment5
Public and Private sector average building and construction investment per decade and per year for
2010 and 2011
1960-1969 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2009 2010 2011
Public sector building and construction investment (real 2005 prices)
57% 65% 54% 43% 52% 61% 62%
Private sector building and construction investment (real 2005 prices)
43% 35% 46% 57% 48% 39% 38%
Source: SARB online data series
For a better built environment6
Source: Rust and Koen (2011)
ISSUES THAT ARE CURRENTLY SHAPING THE COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES OF CONTRACTORS
For a better built environment7
Planned infrastructure drive of government
Government has budget R3,2 trillion in planned infrastructure investment to the year 2020, with R844,5 billion to be spent in the current MTEF period to 2014/15 and R622,8 billion having already been spent in the current MTEF to 2010.
Planned investment will be clustered around 18 Strategic Investment Plans (SIPs) under the co-ordination of the Presidential Investment Coordination Commission (PICC) headed by the President and comprising Provincial Premiers and Local Government Mayors to fast-track and co-ordinate the planned infrastructure projects in 5 to 10 year project pipelines and therefore smooth out construction industry cyclicality.
Asset type Planned expenditure (R billion)
Percentage of total planned expenditure
Used (R billion)
Planned (R billion)
Electricity R1, 945 60,1 % R348,6 R1, 076 Transport R583 18,2% R78,6 R504,4 Liquid fuels R213 6,6% R0 R213 Education R185 5,8% R125 R60 Health R110 3,4% R31 R79 Housing R78 2,4% R5 R73 Water R74 2,3% R32,8 R41,2 Telecoms R15 0,4% R1,8 R13,2 TOTAL R3, 204 100% R622,8 R2,581
For a better built environment8
KEY BE DESIGN PROFESSIONS AND THE STAGES OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS
CBE policy space, regulate BEPs who conceptualise and design infrastructure to protect the public
CIDB policy space, regulate contractors
who build infrastructure to protect the public
OP
ER
AT
ION
S A
ND
MA
INT
AN
AN
CE
– C
BE
AN
D C
IDP
PO
LIC
Y S
PA
CE
For a better built environment9
.
.Percentage number of registered Professionals by race and gender
Source: Professional councils quarterly reports, second quarter 2013/2014
ECSA ECSA BY RACE & Gender ECSA BY RACE & Gender % % GENDER
Gender A W I C T Gender A W I C T
M 3457 20402 1502 511 25872 M 13% 79% 6% 2% 95%
F 649 518 138 31 1336 F 49% 39% 10% 2% 5%
T 4106 20920 1640 542 27208 T 15% 77% 6% 2% 100%
SACAP SACAP BY RACE & Gender SACAP BY RACE & Gender % GENDER
Gender A W I C T Gender A W I C T
M 926 4539 462 508 6435 M 14% 71% 7% 8% 70%
F 81 1116 82 61 1340 F 6% 83% 6% 5% 30%
T 1007 5655 544 569 7775 T 13% 73% 7% 7% 100%
SACLAP SACLAP BY RACE & Gender SACLAP BY RACE & Gender % GENDER
Gender A W I C T Gender A W I C T
M 1 82 0 0
83 M 1% 99% 0% 0% 52%
F 0 73 2 1
76 F 0% 96% 3% 1% 48%
T 1 155 2 1
159 T 1% 97% 1% 1% 100%
SACPCMP SACPCMP BY RACE & Gender SACPCMP BY RACE & Gender % GENDER
Gender A W I C T Gender A W I C T
M 216 1593 88 54 1951 M 11% 82% 5% 3% 98%
F 14 23 5 3 45 F 31% 51% 11% 7% 2%
T 230 1616 93 57 1996 T 12% 81% 5% 3% 100%
SACPVP SACPVP BY RACE & Gender SACPVP BY RACE & Gender % GENDER
Gender A W I C T Gender A W I C T
M 106 978 41 33 1158 M 9% 84% 4% 3% 83%
F 50 160 12 11 233 F 21% 69% 5% 5% 17%
T 157 1138 53 44 1392 T 11% 82% 4% 3% 100%
SACQSP SACQP BY RACE & Gender SACQP BY RACE & Gender % GENDER
Gender A W I C T Gender A W I C T
M 223 1142 124 34
1523 M 15% 75% 8% 2% 83%
F 82 198 20 3
303 F 27% 65% 7% 1% 17%
T 305 1340 144 37
1826 T 17% 73% 8% 2% 100%
Overall Total 5807 30824 2476 1250 40356 T 12% 80% 5% 3% 100%
For a better built environment10
.
.ECSA ECSA BY RACE & Gender ECSA BY RACE & Gender % % GENDER
Gender A W I C T Gender A W I C TM 6392 4577 1319 341 12629 M 51% 36% 10% 3% 78%F 2340 741 385 92 3558 F 66% 21% 11% 3% 22%T 8732 5318 1704 433 16187 T 54% 33% 11% 2% 100%SACAP SACAP BY RACE & Gender SACAP BY RACE & Gender % GENDERGender A W I C T Gender A W I C TM 446 702 94 72 1314 M 34% 53% 7% 6% 70%F 91 412 48 21 572 F 16% 72% 8% 4% 30%T 537 1114 142 93 1886 T 28% 59% 8% 5% 100%SACLAP SACLAP BY RACE & Gender SACLAP BY RACE & Gender % GENDERGender A W I C T Gender A W I C TM 6 16 0 0 22 M 27% 73% 0% 0% 46%F 2 21 0 3 26 F 8% 81% 0% 11% 54%T 8 37 0 3 48 T 17% 77% 0% 6% 100%SACPCMP SACPCMP BY RACE & Gender SACPCMP BY RACE & Gender % GENDERGender A W I C T Gender A W I C TM 566 221 39 39 865 M 65% 25% 5% 5% 77%F 236 14 2 3 255 F 93% 5% 1% 1% 23%T 802 235 41 42 1120 T 72% 20% 4% 4% 100%SACPVP SACPVP BY RACE & Gender SACPVP BY RACE & Gender % GENDERGender A W I C T Gender A W I C TM 198 317 30 5 550 M 36% 58% 5% 1% 64%F 144 101 10 51 305 F 47% 33% 3% 17% 36%T 342 418 40 56 856 T 40% 49% 5% 6% 100%SACQSP SACQP BY RACE & Gender SACQP BY RACE & Gender % GENDERGender A W I C T Gender A W I C TM 376 459 127 43 1005 M 37% 46% 13% 4% 73%F 294 53 11 8 366 F 80% 15% 3% 2% 27%T 670 512 138 51 1371 T 49% 37% 10% 4% 100%
Overall Total 11091 7634 2065 678 21467 T 56% 38% 10% 2% 100%
Percentage number of registered Candidates by race and gender
For a better built environment11
CBE’s Skills Pipeline Intervention Proposal
Exit
Exit
Exit
Exit
School System
15 yrs
18 yrs
Matriculate Graduate
24 yrs
Candidacy
27 yrs
Professional Life
• Government• Parastatals• Private Sector
• CBE• 6 Councils in BE
Push Strategy Intermediate Strategy Pull Strategy
For a better built environment12
SKILLS DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES - CBE 1. School Level Initiatives•Career Awareness Initiatives – videos to increase footprint & reach•Maths & Science support to schools – partnering with already successful entities•GirlEng – excellence in Maths & Science – already supporting 2. Tertiary Level •Bursary scheme–centralised & formulating comprehensive student support program• Interaction with Academic Institutions : Research Partnerships programmes & input to curriculum(labour intensive construction; health & safety; green agenda) 3. Recent Graduates/Candidates •Formulated a Workplace Training structured Candidacy Programme with quality assurance guidelines, to enable relevant workplace training & accelerate professional registration.4. CPD Programmes• Driven by 6 Professional Councils and Voluntary Associations.5. Public Sector Technical Skills Development Initiatives•DPW internal technical skills development initiatives – national & provincial•MISA (Municipal Infrastructure Support Agency) technical skills dev initiatives•Participation in Skills Plan-Presidential Infrastructure Projects – skills plan
For a better built environment13
Proposed solutions regards professional registration
1. A workplace training programme that links to professional registration.
2. A framework to understand and monitor what happens at the workplace – no information on every graduate or candidate regarding where they are doing in the workplace; including proper training plans, host workplace checklists, mentors training and agreements and rotation of candidate to cover core areas.
3. A quality assured, transparent candidacy programme and an unbiased and uniform assessment process of candidates at each professional council.
4. Packaging incentives for employers who take on candidates and trainees.
5. Educating the unregistered BE graduates on the importance of registration.
6. Transformation Implementation model to address skills development based interventions.
7. Workplace Training Implementation model to address quality assured workplace training that is linked to professional registration – starting with the BE graduates in the public sector and unemployed graduates.
TRANSFORMATION IMPLEMENTATION MODEL FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT PROFESSIONSProposals from the Draft Transformation Implementation Model :
Proposed Structure
Establishment of a Non-Profit Organisation comprising of a Board of Trustees from CBE, DPW, Dept of Higher Education and Training, Infrastructure Departments,Construction SETA, representatives of the 6 Professional Councils and the Private Sector.
Proposed Key Programmes and Proposed Funding Mechanisms
1. Education Upliftment Programme
Maths and Science Grade 8 to 12 upliftment program
Maths and Science Teacher support programme
Career Awareness
Proposed Funding: The National Skills Fund.
2. Bursary Fund Scheme and University Capacity Programme
Central Bursary Scheme
University student support program
Retention of built environment lecturers and programmes
Lecturer support programmes
Built Environment Research Fund with partners Academic Institutions, NRF and Industry
Proposed Funding: Board of Trustees raises 50% of funding and 50% from National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS), SETAs, Employer bodies, DHET, etc.
3. Workplace Learning Support Programme
Structured Candidacy
Workplace training that enables professional registration
Work integrated learning opportunities for University of Technology or Comprehensive University national diploma students
Proposed Funding: Board of Trustees approach SETAs, employer bodies, DHET (NSF), etc, for funding.
4. Registered Professionals Support Programme
Retention program for built environment professionals
Proposed Funding: Employer bodies.
5. Public Sector Professionals Support Programme
Program for built environment professionals in the public sector including municipalities
Proposed Funding: Departmental Budgets, SETAs, DHET (NSF), Treasury
For a better built environment15
Thank you