focusing the clinical assessment knut schroeder general practitioner, bristol honorary senior...
TRANSCRIPT
Focusing the Clinical
Assessment
Knut SchroederGeneral Practitioner, Bristol
Honorary Senior Clinical LecturerUniversity of Bristol
Meeting on CPRsDublin
Friday 4th June 2010
Clinical assessment
History and examination provide basis for safe and effective practice (Sackett 1992)
New doctors - difficulty with transition from ‘full’ to ‘focused’
General Practice - unselected and undifferentiated presentations
GP consultation needs to be focused and patient-centred
From ‘full’ to ‘focused’Full Focused
Time ~ 45 mins ~ 10 mins
Aims Diagnosis Prognosis/holistic
Style Emphasis on
data collection
Integrated and flexible reasoning
(multi-level)
Structure Fixed structureTailored to the
clinical presentation
Prevalence of disease
High pre-test probability of
disease
Low pre-test probability of
disease
Potential of the consultation
Sullivan, F. et al. BMJ 2005;331:831-833Adapted from: Stott NCH, Davies RH. J Roy Coll Gen Pract 1979;29: 201-5
Copyright ©2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Consultation length
Many GP appointments 10 minutes or less
Can be difficult to assess complex patients in less than 15 mins (Freeman 2002)
Longer consultations identify psychological problems better (Howie 2002)
Applying focus to the consultation
Systematic data gathering
More effective if acknowledging and responding to patient’s problems and concerns (Freeman 2002)
Integrate communication and clinical skills
Need holistic and patient-centred approach
Diagnostic stages & strategies
.
Copyright ©2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. Heneghan, C et al. BMJ 2009;338:b946
Strategies used for refining diagnosis
Copyright ©2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. Heneghan, C et al. BMJ 2009;338:b946
Pattern recognition fit
Symptoms and signs are compared with previous patterns or cases
Refinement strategy most commonly used by GPs
Relies on memory of known patterns
Pattern recognition fit: Example
65 year old woman with tiredness:•Doesn’t like the cold•Constipated•Lack of energy•Weight gain•Coarse skin•‘Hair problems’Diagnosis: HYPOTHYROIDISM
Restricted rule-outs
• Also called ‘Murtagh’s process’
• Start with most common cause – “probability diagnosis”
• Rule out a shortlist of serious diagnoses
Heneghan, C et al. BMJ 2009;338:b946
Restricted rule-out: Example
18 year old student with 2 day hx fever
Likely diagnosis: VIRAL INFECTION
Rule out:Meningitis
Meningococcal septicaemia
Chest infection
Stepwise refinement
• Anatomical location of a problemArm Leg
• Pathological processBacterialViral
Heneghan, C et al. BMJ 2009;338:b946
Stepwise refinement: Example
55 year old man with leg pain
Refinement:•Foot
•1st MTP jointDiagnosis:
GOUT
Probabilistic reasoning
Specific but imperfect use of symptoms, signs, diagnostic tests
Rule in or rule out diagnosis
Heneghan, C et al. BMJ 2009;338:b946
Probabilistic reasoning: Example
40 year old woman with SOB
•Leg swelling and pain
•Hip operation 3/52 ago
•Tachycardia
•Positive d-dimer test
Diagnosis: Pulmonary embolism
Clinical prediction rule
• Formal version of pattern recognition and probabilistic reasoning
• Based on validated research• Additional value of symptoms and
signs• Work out probabilities• Diagnosis & prognosis• Ruling in and ruling out diagnosis
CPR Example: Wells Score (PE)
40 year old woman with SOB
Wells score: Suspected DVT - 3 points
Alternative diagnosis is less likely than PE - 3 points
Tachycardia - 1.5 points
Immobilization/surgery in previous four weeks - 1.5 points
Hx of DVT or PE - 1.5 points
Haemoptysis - 1 point
Malignancy (treatment for within 6 months, palliative) - 1 point
Role of CPRs in avoiding errors
• Errors more likely due to clinical reasoning rather than lack of knowledge or incompetence (Scott 2009)
• Need to cultivate self-awareness (Borrell-Carrió 2004)
• Common error is wrongly estimating pre-test probability (Fahey 2008)
• Good communication skills are important (Panting 2004)
Integrating IT & CPRs
• Using computers is part of ‘modern’ GP consultation
• Diagnostic guidelines
• Decision aids
• Improve clinical performance (Montgomery 1998)
• May change flow of consultation (Silverman 2007)
• GPs appropriately reduce use of computers in psychological problems (Chan 2007)
CPRs in the consultation
Pneumonia – CRB 65
Sore throat - Centor
AF and stroke risk – CHADS 2
Stroke Risk - ABCD2
Appendicitis - Alvarado
Clinical ConfidenceThe three C’s:
Caring
Communicating
Competence
(Stone, Am J Med 2006, McCormick BJGP 2000)