flt3 inhibitors

14
"FLT3-ITD and FLT3 Inhibitors "FLT3-ITD and FLT3 Inhibitors in the Setting of Allogeneic in the Setting of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Stem Cell Transplantation for AML" AML" Pr. Mohamad MOHTY Head, Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy Dpt. Université Pierre & Marie Curie Hôpital Saint-Antoine Paris, France

Upload: spa718

Post on 25-Dec-2014

282 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


5 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FLT3 INHIBITORS

"FLT3-ITD and FLT3 Inhibitors "FLT3-ITD and FLT3 Inhibitors

in the Setting of Allogeneic Stem Cell in the Setting of Allogeneic Stem Cell

Transplantation for AML"Transplantation for AML"

Pr. Mohamad MOHTYHead, Clinical Hematology and

Cellular Therapy Dpt.Université Pierre & Marie Curie

Hôpital Saint-AntoineParis, France

Page 2: FLT3 INHIBITORS

JMD

TK1

TK2

Nakao M, Leukemia 1996; Whitman SP, Cancer Res 2001; Thiede C, Blood 2002;Kottaridis PD, Blood 2002; Gale RE, Blood 2008; Breitenbuecher F, Blood 2008

FLT3FLT3 Mutations Mutations

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3

• - ~ 25% of patients with AML

• - High incidence in AML with• NPM1 mutations (40%)

• t(15;17)(q21;q21)/PML-RARA (40-45%)

• t(6;9)(p23;q34)/DEK-NUP214 (75%)

• - Associated with inferior prognosis:• Allelic ratio (mut/wt)

• ITD insertion site

Page 3: FLT3 INHIBITORS

FLT3-ITD - Negative Prognostic Impact in the Context of Other Genetic Aberrations

Multivariable Analysis on Overall Survival n=398 ECOG E1900

Total cohortHR p-value

FLT3-ITD 1.59 0.003

Intermediate-riskHR p-value

FLT3-ITD 2.54 0.001

Patel JP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1079-89.

Page 4: FLT3 INHIBITORS

P=0.71 P=0.003

Donor n=60

No-Donor n=148

Donor n=38

No-Donor n=97

NPM1mut/FLT3 ITDneg

NPM1mut/FLT3 ITDneg a Predictive Genotype for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in CN-AML*

*excluding CEBPAmut cases

FLT3 ITDpos

NPM1WT/FLT3 ITDneg/CEBPAWT

Schlenk et al., N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1909-18

Time [months]

Rel

ap

se-f

ree

Su

rviv

al [

%]

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0

20

40

60

80

100

Time [months]

Rel

ap

se-f

ree

Su

rviv

al [

%]

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0

20

40

60

80

100

Page 5: FLT3 INHIBITORS

Brunet S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:735-41.

FLT3-ITD – A Negative Prognostic Markerafter allo-HSCT in 1st CR

FLT3-ITDpos n=120

FLT3-ITDneg n=86

MVA: HR 3.4 (95%-CI 1.46-7.94)n=158

FLT3-ITDneg n=86

FLT3-ITDpos n=120

MVA: HR 2.7 (95%-CI 1.37-5.26)n=158

Page 6: FLT3 INHIBITORS

Functional regions according to Griffith et al. Mol Cell. 2004;13(2):169-78.

ITDs

COOH

572-578

579-592

593-603

604-609

610-615

616-623

624-630

> 630

amino acid

Structure of FLT3-Receptor:Impact of Insertion Site

JM

TK1

JM-B: binding motifJM-B: binding motif

JM-S: switch motifJM-S: switch motif

JM-Z: zipper motifJM-Z: zipper motif

hinge region of JMhinge region of JM

beta1-sheetbeta1-sheet

nucleotide binding loopnucleotide binding loop

beta2-sheetbeta2-sheet

3`of beta2-sheet3`of beta2-sheet

Juxta-Juxta-membranemembrane

domaindomain

TyrosineTyrosinekinase 1kinase 1domaindomain

NH2

Page 7: FLT3 INHIBITORS

time (years)

Rel

apse

Fre

e S

urv

ival

(%)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

0

25

50

75

100

time (years)

Ove

rall

Su

rviv

al(%

)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

0

25

50

75

100

Panel A Panel B

Insertion site within the beta-1 sheet

all other insertion sites

Insertion site within the beta-1 sheet

all other insertion sites

P=0.002P=0.001

FLT3-ITDpos RFS and OS according to insertion site

Kayser et al., Blood 2009;114:2386-92.

Page 8: FLT3 INHIBITORS

Tyrosine Kinase InhibitorsSelectivity and Potency

Staurosporine Midostaurin Sorafenib Sunitinib Quizartinib

Karaman MW, et al. Nature Biotechnology 2008;26 (1):127-132Zarrinkar PP, et al. Blood. 2009;114(14):2984-2992..

Page 9: FLT3 INHIBITORS

Sorafenib in Relapsed Patients with FLT3-ITD positive AML

Metzelder et al., Leukemia 2012; epub 08.05.2012

Population:n=65 patients (n=63 relapsed/refractory, n=2 in CR)

Two cohorts:a) n=29 pts. after allo-HSCTb) n=36 pts. after intensive chemotheray

Treatment: Sorafenib starting dose 2 x 400 mg Median duration and dose

a) 76 days (14-904) 600 mg/db) 74 days (1-270) 486,5 mg/d

Response cohort-a cohort-bCMR 7 (24%) 3 (8.5%)CR/CRi 7 (24%) 8 (22%)PR/HR/BMR 14 (48.5%) 25 (69.5 %)refractory 1 (3.5%)

Resistancea) 197 days (38-225)b) 136 days (38-225)

Page 10: FLT3 INHIBITORS

Sorafenib in Relapsed Patients afterallo-HSCT with FLT3-ITD positive AML

Median treatment duration 74 days (1-270 days) median dose 600 mg/d

Metzelder et al., Leukemia 2012; epub 08.05.2012

Sorafenib treatment

Allogeneic HSCT

Time to treatment failure

n=29

n=36

Page 11: FLT3 INHIBITORS

Quizartinib in Relapsed Patients with FLT3-ITD positive AML

Lewis et al., ASH 2012 #673

Population:n=99 patients (relapsed/refractory)

Two cohorts:a) n=25 pts. after allogeneic HSCTb) n=74 pts. after intensive chemotherapy

Treatment: Quizartinib starting dose 90mg/135mg

Response cohort-a cohort-bCR/CRi 14 (56%) 30 (41%)PR/HR/BMR 6 (24%) 17 (23%)refractory 5 (20%) 27 (36%)

Median response duration 11.3 weeks

Page 12: FLT3 INHIBITORS

• Sorafenib Maintenance Therapy for Patients With AML After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (NCT01398501); Massachusetts General Hospital, n=28, Start Date: August 2011, Estimated Primary Completion Date: August 2014

• A Study of AC220 Given After Transplant in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (NCT01468467); Astellas Pharma Inc, n=30, Start Date: April 2012, Estimated Study Completion Date: March 2015

• Sorafenib Tosylate Before and After Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (NCT01578109); Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, n=36, Start Date: January 2012, Estimated Primary Completion Date: December 2015

• A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multi-center phase II trial to assess the efficacy of Sorafenib-maintenance therapy in FLT3-ITD positive AML in complete hematological remission after allogenic stem cell transplantation ; EudraCT Number: 2010-018539-16University of Marburg, n=200

TKIs in Patients with FLT3-ITD positive AMLbefore and after allo-HSCT

Active Clinical Trials

Page 13: FLT3 INHIBITORS

Conclusions

• FLT3-ITD is frequently present in adult AML with

highest incidence in patients aged 18 to 60 years

• In normal caryotype AML, important cooperating gene

mutations are NPM1-mut and DNMT3A-mut

• Mutant/wild type ratio and insertion in the β1-sheet are

important prognostic markers in FLT3-ITD positive

AML

Page 14: FLT3 INHIBITORS

Conclusions

• Allo-HSCT in first CR in FLT3-ITD positive AML results

in improved outcome especially in those patients

lacking a high mutant/wild type ratio and/or insertion

in the β1-sheet

• TKIs showed remarkable activity as single agent in

relapsed/refractory FLT3-ITDpos AML, especially, after

allo-HSCT

• Drug-Drug interactions may heavily influence TKI

metabolism via Cytochrome P450 3A4

• TKIs can block glucuronidation of drugs e.g.

paracetamol which may lead to sever hepatotoxicity