flows for the future 2005 environmental flows conference texas state university – san marcos

20
FLOWS FOR THE FUTURE FLOWS FOR THE FUTURE 2005 Environmental Flows 2005 Environmental Flows Conference Conference Texas State University – San Texas State University – San Marcos Marcos November 1, 2005 November 1, 2005 Bob Brandes Bob Brandes Region M Water Planning Study Region M Water Planning Study

Upload: myles-beck

Post on 31-Dec-2015

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

FLOWS FOR THE FUTURE 2005 Environmental Flows Conference Texas State University – San Marcos November 1, 2005 Bob Brandes Region M Water Planning Study. Rio Grande Planning Region. Region M Counties and River Basins. Region M Projected Population. Region M Environmental Flow Issues. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

FLOWS FOR THE FUTUREFLOWS FOR THE FUTURE

2005 Environmental Flows Conference2005 Environmental Flows Conference

Texas State University – San MarcosTexas State University – San MarcosNovember 1, 2005November 1, 2005

Bob BrandesBob Brandes

Region M Water Planning StudyRegion M Water Planning Study

Rio Grande Rio Grande Planning Planning RegionRegion

Region M Counties and River BasinsRegion M Counties and River Basins

10 0 10 Miles

N

Nueces

Nueces-Rio Grande

Rio Grande

NuecesBasin

Rio GrandeBasin

Nueces-Rio GrandeBasin

MAVERICKCOUNTY

WEBBCOUNTY

ZAPATACOUNTY JIM HOGG

COUNTY

STARRCOUNTY

HIDALGOCOUNTY

WILLACYCOUNTY

CAMERONCOUNTY

Figure 3.2 - Rio Grande Water Planning RegionShowing Basin Areas

Region M Projected PopulationRegion M Projected Population

0500,000

1,000,0001,500,0002,000,0002,500,0003,000,0003,500,0004,000,000

Po

pu

lati

on

D2000 D2020 D2040 D2060

Decade

Region MRegion MEnvironmental Flow IssuesEnvironmental Flow Issues

• Rio Grande Flows Are Highly Regulated Rio Grande Flows Are Highly Regulated andand Subject to Mexico’s OperationsSubject to Mexico’s Operations

• Rio Grande Basin Is Already Over-Rio Grande Basin Is Already Over-AppropriatedAppropriated

• Projected Demands Are Changing and Projected Demands Are Changing and Substantial Relative To Existing SuppliesSubstantial Relative To Existing Supplies

• Strategies Reflect Primarily Utilization of Strategies Reflect Primarily Utilization of Existing Surface Water Resources; No Existing Surface Water Resources; No Major Surface Water DevelopmentMajor Surface Water Development

Amistad Reservoir

Falcon Reservoir

Anzalduas Reservoir

Elephant Butte Reservoir

MajorMajorRio GrandeRio GrandeMainstemMainstemReservoirsReservoirs

Total Storage Capacity: ~ 8,000,000 Acre-Feet

Caballo Reservoir

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Below E

lepha

nt B

utte

Dam

El Pas

o

Below A

meric

an D

am

Fort Q

uitm

an

Above R

io C

oncho

s

Below R

io C

oncho

s

Foster R

anch

Below A

mist

ad D

am

Del Rio

Eagle

Pas

s

Laredo

Below F

alcon

Dam

Rio G

rand

e City

Below A

nzald

uas

Dam

San B

enito

Browns

ville

AN

NU

AL

AV

ER

AG

E F

LO

WM

ILLI

ON

AC

RE

-FE

ET

1968-1998 Rio Grande Mean Annual Flows1968-1998 Rio Grande Mean Annual Flows

MexicanMexicanTreatyTreaty

TributaryTributaryReservoirsReservoirs

Total Storage Capacity: ~ 4,000,000 Acre-Feet

Rio San Juan Reservoir Capacity: ~

1,700,000 Acre-feet

Region MRegion MEnvironmental Flow IssuesEnvironmental Flow Issues

• Rio Grande Flows Are Highly Regulated Rio Grande Flows Are Highly Regulated andand Subject to Mexico’s OperationsSubject to Mexico’s Operations

• Rio Grande Basin Is Already Over-Rio Grande Basin Is Already Over-AppropriatedAppropriated

• Projected Demands Are Changing and Projected Demands Are Changing and Substantial Relative To Existing SuppliesSubstantial Relative To Existing Supplies

• Strategies Reflect Primarily Utilization of Strategies Reflect Primarily Utilization of Existing Surface Water Resources; No Existing Surface Water Resources; No Major Surface Water DevelopmentMajor Surface Water Development

Region M Existing Water RightsRegion M Existing Water Rights

336,642

54,819

1,853,179

2,6940

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

1,800,000

2,000,000

Div

ersi

on

Am

ou

nt

(Ac-

Ft/

Yea

r)

MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL IRRIGATION MINING

Total Authorized Water Rights: 2,247,334 Ac-Ft/Yr

 

YearYear United StatesUnited States MexicoMexico TotalTotal

20002000 1,087,4491,087,449 901,700901,700 1,989,1491,989,149

20102010 1,067,3101,067,310 888,200888,200 1,955,5101,955,510

20202020 1,056,7191,056,719 879,700879,700 1,936,4191,936,419

20302030 1,048,9651,048,965 869,200869,200 1,918,1651,918,165

20402040 1,041,6271,041,627 858,700858,700 1,900,3271,900,327

20502050 1,034,5921,034,592 846,700846,700 1,881,2921,881,292

20602060 1,024,9871,024,987 835,700835,700 1,860,6871,860,687

Projected Firm Annual YieldProjected Firm Annual YieldAmistad-Falcon Reservoir SystemAmistad-Falcon Reservoir System

Region MRegion MEnvironmental Flow IssuesEnvironmental Flow Issues

• Rio Grande Basin Is Already Over-Rio Grande Basin Is Already Over-AppropriatedAppropriated

• Rio Grande Flows Are Highly Regulated Rio Grande Flows Are Highly Regulated and Subject to Mexico’s Operationsand Subject to Mexico’s Operations

• Projected Demands Are Changing and Projected Demands Are Changing and Substantial Relative To Existing SuppliesSubstantial Relative To Existing Supplies

• Strategies Reflect Primarily Utilization of Strategies Reflect Primarily Utilization of Existing Surface Water Resources; No Existing Surface Water Resources; No Major Surface Water DevelopmentMajor Surface Water Development

D2060 Demands

MUNICIPAL37.7%

STEAM ELECTRIC2.0%

MINING0.3%

LIVESTOCK0.4%

MANUFACTURING0.7%

IRRIGATION59.1%

Region M Water DemandsRegion M Water Demands

D2000 Demands IRRIGATION82.9%

MANUFACTURING0.4%

MUNICIPAL15.5%

STEAM ELECTRIC0.5%

MINING0.3%

LIVESTOCK0.4%

Municipal Supply vs Demand Municipal Supply vs Demand (acre-feet/year)(acre-feet/year)

 

Irrigation Supply vs Demand Irrigation Supply vs Demand (acre-feet/year)(acre-feet/year)

 

Historical Irrigation Demands Historical Irrigation Demands

 

Figure 3.23 Total Historical Irrigation and Mining Water UseFrom Amistad and Falcon Reservoirs

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

1,800,000

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Acr

e-F

eet

Source: Rio Grande Watermaster

Total Irrigation Water Use Varies According To Total Irrigation Water Use Varies According To Available Amistad-Falcon Supply and ClimateAvailable Amistad-Falcon Supply and Climate

Region MRegion MEnvironmental Flow IssuesEnvironmental Flow Issues

• Rio Grande Basin Is Already Over-Rio Grande Basin Is Already Over-AppropriatedAppropriated

• Rio Grande Flows Are Highly Regulated Rio Grande Flows Are Highly Regulated andand Subject to Mexico’s OperationsSubject to Mexico’s Operations

• Projected Demands Are Changing and Projected Demands Are Changing and Substantial Relative To Existing SuppliesSubstantial Relative To Existing Supplies

• Strategies Reflect Primarily Utilization of Strategies Reflect Primarily Utilization of Existing Surface Water Resources; No Existing Surface Water Resources; No Major Surface Water DevelopmentMajor Surface Water Development

Projected Water SuppliesProjected Water SuppliesFrom Recommended StrategiesFrom Recommended Strategies

Acquisition/Conversion of Water RightsAcquisition/Conversion of Water Rights 136,171136,171

Brackish Groundwater DesalinationBrackish Groundwater Desalination 62,339 62,339

Gulf Coast Aquifer DevelopmentGulf Coast Aquifer Development 49,204 49,204

Advanced Water ConservationAdvanced Water Conservation 43,766 43,766

Non-Potable Water ReuseNon-Potable Water Reuse 38,532 38,532

Brownsville Weir and ReservoirBrownsville Weir and Reservoir 20,643 20,643

Potable Water ReusePotable Water Reuse 1,120 1,120

Seawater DesalinationSeawater Desalination 889 889

Total Additional SupplyTotal Additional Supply 352,664 352,664

Strategies With PotentialStrategies With PotentialDirect River Flow ImpactsDirect River Flow Impacts

• Acquisition/Conversion of Existing Water Acquisition/Conversion of Existing Water RightsRights• Urbanization of Irrigated FarmlandUrbanization of Irrigated Farmland• Purchase of Existing Unused Water RightsPurchase of Existing Unused Water Rights• Contract for Municipal Water from Irrigation Contract for Municipal Water from Irrigation

DistrictDistrict

• Brownsville Weir and ReservoirBrownsville Weir and Reservoir• Water Right Permit Issued By StateWater Right Permit Issued By State• Includes Environmental Flow ProvisionsIncludes Environmental Flow Provisions

FLOWS FOR THE FUTUREFLOWS FOR THE FUTURE

2005 Environmental Flows Conference2005 Environmental Flows Conference

Texas State University – San MarcosTexas State University – San MarcosNovember 1, 2005November 1, 2005

Bob BrandesBob Brandes

Region M Water Planning StudyRegion M Water Planning Study