florence m. turyashemererwa lecturer- makerere university
DESCRIPTION
159 million children stunted in 2014 No of children affected (millions) Prevalence ( %) Recently the worlds top scientists identified a more sensitive indicator of nutritional status, based on the height for age of children under 5.A stunted child has an immediate higher risk for communicable diseases and a longer term higher risk of chronic diseases; a stunted child does not develop in the same way as a normally growing child and in the long term has less professional opportunities. In 2014 ,159 million children (26%) under 5 were stunted, approximately one child out of three. Source: UNICEF, WHO and the World Bank Joint Child malnutrition estimatesTRANSCRIPT
Knowledge &Research gaps in policy and programming for
maternal infant and young child nutrition
Florence M. Turyashemererwa Lecturer- Makerere University Nutrition
Consultant -WHO Researcher-Nutrition Innovation Lab Africa I will
start this presentation with a brief overview of the global
nutrition challenges affecting mothers and children using selected
indicators 159 million children stunted in 2014
No of children affected(millions) Prevalence ( %) Recently the
worlds top scientists identified a more sensitive indicator of
nutritional status, based on the height for age of children under
5.A stunted child has an immediatehigher risk for communicable
diseases and a longer term higher risk of chronic diseases; a
stunted child does not develop in the same way as a normally
growing child and in the long term has less professional
opportunities. In 2014 ,159 million children (26%) under 5 were
stunted, approximately one child out of three. Source: UNICEF, WHO
and the World Bank Joint Child malnutrition estimates Where are the
stunted children?
Stunting is highly prvalent in sub-saharan Africa and in South
Asia. A large number of stunted children live in south Asia and
about 40 countries are home to 90% of the world stunted children.
20 of these are in sub sharan Africa. 50 million wasted children in
2014
Prevalence ( %) No of children affected(millions) 8% global
prevalence of wasting 3% global prevalence of severe wasting Acute
malnutrition is intimately associated to chronic malnutrition. In
2014 acute malnutrition was present in 50 million children, of
children under 5. Out of them, 16 million were affected by the most
severe and life threatening form of wasting. Source: UNICEF, WHO
and the World Bank Joint Child malnutrition estimates Where is
acute malnutrition concentrated?
This slide shows the prevalence of acute malnutrition in diffrent
world regions. When the blue diamond is in the green area the
prevalence is lower than the 5% indicated by the WHA as a target to
achieve. Other colours indicate the presence of a public health
problem of increasing magnitude. Middle (10%)and Northern (13%) are
the worst affected in Africa Source: UNICEF, WHO and the World Bank
Joint Child malnutrition estimates Over 270 million children have
anemia
A second form of malnutrition, linked to the inadequate intake of
vitamins and mineralsThe condition with the highest prevalence is
anemia. It has also been named the hidden hunger,as its impact
Anemia also affects over 270 million children under 5. Early
childhood anemia is associated with impaired cognitive development.
South Asia is the most affected on the global scale. In Africa,
Centra and West Africa followed by East Africa are worst affected.
Source : Stevens et al. Lancet Glob Health 2013; 1: e1625 496
million non pregnant and 32 million pregnant women with
anemia
The impact of anemia on women is greater on their own health as
anemia affects womens working capacity, wellbeing and mortaltiy.
Anemia also affectsthe health of their offspring. Anemia is due to
multiple causes, including birth spacing, malaria and other
infectious diseases. A large proportion of anemias approximately
half are due to iron deficiency. In 2011 approximately 530 million
women were anemic. Source : Stevens et al. Lancet Glob Health 2013;
1: e1625 41 million children are overweight
No of children affected(millions) Prevalence ( %) The third from of
malnutrition, that has started to be recognised globally is
overweight. Overweight was thought to be an issue only for high
income countries and populations, and an issue for middle aged men.
We can now say that overweight is almost ubiquitous, starts early
in life and is rapidly increasing. In million children before age 5
were overweight. 30 million were in lower middle income countries
and 6 million in low income countries Source: UNICEF, WHO and the
World Bank Joint Child malnutrition estimates The double burden of
malnutrition
This graph shows even better the coexistence of the two conditions
in the same country. In South Africa, for example, over 40% of
women is obese, the more severe condition, and 10% is underweight.
The reverse happens in Bangladesh, where over 40% of the women is
underweight and 5% obese. Conceptual Framework to achieve optimal
fetal growth and development
conceptual framework, taken from the Lancet series of 2013 is a
means to optimal fetal growth and development. The framework shows
how dietary, behavioural and health factors are affected by
underlying food security, caregiving resources and environment. In
turn these are affected by economic social conditions and factors
of governance. Acceleration of progress in nutrition will require
coupling nutrition specific and nutrition sentitive interventions
and building and enabling environment. Lancet, 2013
Nutrition-specific Interventions and Programs
Interventions or programs that address the immediate determinants
of fetal and child nutrition and developmentdietary intake,
feeding, caregiving and parenting practices, and infections
Examples: Adolescent, preconception, and maternal health and
nutrition Maternal dietary or micronutrient supplementation
Promotion of optimum breastfeeding Complementary feeding and
responsive feeding practices and stimulation Dietary
supplementation Diversification and micronutrient supplementation
or fortification for children Treatment of severe acute
malnutrition Disease prevention and management Nutrition in
emergencies Nutrition-sensitive Interventions and Programs
Interventions or programs that address the underlying determinants
of fetal and child nutrition and development food security;
adequate caregiving resources at maternal, household and community
levels; and access to health services and a safe and hygienic
environmentand incorporate specific nutrition goals and actions
Nutrition-sensitive programs can serve as delivery platforms for
nutrition-specific interventions, potentially increasing their
scale, coverage and effectiveness Examples: Agriculture and food
security Social safety nets Early child development Maternal mental
health Womens empowerment Child protection Schooling Water,
sanitation and hygiene Health and family planning services What
Makes Programs Potentially Nutrition-sensitive?
They address critical underlying determinants of under nutrition
They are implemented at large scale and are effective at reaching
thepoorwho also have the highest malnutrition rates Accelerating
progress in nutrition requires increasing the nutritional impact of
effective, large-scale, nutrition-sensitive programmes Review of
nutritional impact of Programs from 4 Sectors for evidence and
gaps
Agriculture Social safety nets Early child development Schooling
Selected based on: Relevance for nutrition Availability of
evaluations of nutritional impact -Relevant in that they address
the most of the important underlying causes of malnutrition -Of the
four, agriculture and social safety meet the 4 criteria. -Early
child hood development programs limited by coverage but included
because child development and nutrition share many risk factors
-schooling also important because of the evidence of parental
education on nutrition and development High coverage of the poor
Targeting: programs that are or could be targeted to reach
nutritionally vulnerable groups Agricultural Programmes
Livelihoods and income Household food security Diet quality Womens
income and empowerment Homestead food production Biofor-tification
Livestock production and aquaculture Have impacts on several
underlying determinants of nutrition:livelihood, hh food security,
diet quality, womens income and empowerment and complement global
efforts to stimulate agricultural productivity increasing producer
incomes while protecting consumers from high food prices
Nutritional Impacts of Targeted Agricultural Programmes
Although there is some evidence of impact from home gardens and
homestead food production systems on vitamin A intake and status of
children but this is limited What is the evidence of nutritional
impact? Strong evidence from roll out of biofortified vitamin A
rich orange sweet potato on vitamin A intake of mothers and
children and vitamin A status of children Possible causes of
limited evidence Weaknesses in program goals, design, targeting,
implementation Social Safety Nets are very important poverty
reduction tools:
Provide transfers to a billion poor people and reducepoverty; are
often implemented at scale and achieve high coverage of the poor;
increase demand for health and education services are very
important poverty reduction tools: Help mitigate negative effects
of global changes, conflicts, shocks Enhance womens empowerment
when targeted to women and when they include specific
gender-focused interventions Usually include food and cash
transfers What is the evidence of nutritional impact? Strong
evidence of impacts on health care utilisation, but limited impacts
on child nutrition; some studies show impacts in younger, poorer
children, with longer exposure Lack of clarity in nutrition goals,
weaknesses in design and poor quality health services Possible
cause of limited evidence Early Child Development
Stunting and poor cognitive development share many similar risk
including: Nutritional deficiencies Intra-uterine growth
restriction Social and economic conditions such as poverty and
maternal depression Peak vulnerability: the first 1,000 days
Evidence from small-scale programs targeted to at-risk children
suggests additive effects on child development and in some cases on
nutrition outcomes Interventions include core maternal and child
nutrition interventions, physchosocial stumulation, responsive
feeding etc. Also share a period of peak vulnerability.. What is
the evidence of nutritional impact? Combining early child
development and nutrition interventions makes sense biologically
and programmatically and could lead to significant gains in both
nutrition and child development outcomes Possible cause of limited
evidence Weakness is on nutritional goals and outcomes. Need to be
tested at scale. Schooling Risk of child stunting is significantly
lower among mothers
Parental schooling is a critical input to nutrition Risk of child
stunting is significantly lower among mothers with at least some
primary schooling risk even lower for those with secondary
schooling Schooling is important for the nutrition of the next
generation Positive global trends in schooling reductions in gender
gap What are the key findings Although school children are beyond
the crucial 1000 days, their schooling experience may be a stonger
determinant of nutrition for the next generation. More girls
enrolled in primary and secondary schools Schools provide an
opportunity to include specific nutritionpromotion and education to
prevent or treat undernutrition in school children and future
generations Assessments of the effectiveness of school programs on
nutrition and on their future parenting skills of children are
needed Possible cause of limited evidence Summary of major gaps
Programmes in these sectors are successful
at addressing several underlying determinants of nutrition, but
evidence of nutritional impact is still limited Enhancing the
Nutrition-sensitivity of Programs
Improve targeting, timing and duration of exposure to interventions
How can we make programs more nutrition sensitive? Use conditions
to stimulate demand for program services Strengthen nutrition
goals, design, implementation Optimise womens nutrition, time,
physical and mental health and empowerment Own country
experience
Which programs have been successful in your country to reduce
maternal and child under nutrition What are the strengths and
weaknesses of these programs?