flare compliance testing - waste management€¦ · flare compliance testing october 2011 as...

FLARE COMPLIANCE TESTINGOctober 2011

As Defined By The

Code of Federal Regulations; Title 40 Part 60, 25 Pa. Code Chapter 139 & Pennsylvania State Operating Permit

RMCEINC Project #2011 - 16019

WASTE MANAGEMENT DISPOSAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.POTTSTOWN LANDFILL

POTTSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA

Title V Operating Permit Number: TVOP-46-00033 (May 8, 2006)

ONE (1) ENCLOSED FLARE #2 (CO5)

PREPARED FOR:Waste Management Disposal Services of Pennsylvania, Inc.

BY:RMC ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. – CHICAGO REGIONAL OFFICE

_____________

R

Pottstown Landfill RMCEInc-Chicago Regional OfficePottstown, Pennsylvania Project #2011-16019

REPORT CERTIFICATION

The sampling, analysis, and data collection performed for this report were carried out under my direction and supervision, and Ihereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate, to the best of my knowledge.

Date 11/28/2011 SignatureRachel Chleborowicz, QSTIProject Manager

RMC ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

S


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................5

1.1 Company Information................................................................................................................................................................5

1.2 Test Information.........................................................................................................................................................................5

2.0 EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................................5

2.1 Facility Description, Process Information, and Emission Source Description ......................................................................5

3.0 SOURCE TEST PROGRAM DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................7

3.1 Test Contractor ..........................................................................................................................................................................7

3.2 Test Program Organization .......................................................................................................................................................7

3.3 Test Program Objectives ...........................................................................................................................................................7

4.0 REFERENCE TEST EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES.................................................................................................9

4.1 Instrumentation and Equipment Procedures.............................................................................................................................94.1.1 Instrumental (NOx, CO, NMOC and O2/CO2) Procedures .......................................................................................94.1.2 Instrumental Analytical Data.....................................................................................................................................104.1.3 Volumetric Flow Rates .............................................................................................................................................104.1.4 Fuel Analysis Testing (EPA Method 19).................................................................................................................11

4.2 Test Methods............................................................................................................................................................................13

4.3 Analytical Methods ..................................................................................................................................................................13

4.4 Sampling Site Location............................................................................................................................................................13

4.5 Sample Matrix..........................................................................................................................................................................13

5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION......................................................................................13

6.0 SOURCE TEST REPORT .......................................................................................................................................................13

6.1 Report Format..........................................................................................................................................................................13

6.2 Data Reduction Procedures/ Methods ....................................................................................................................................13

APPENDIX A. REFERENCE DATA SUMMARY............................................................................................................... A

APPENDIX B. INSTRUMENTAL TEST DATA ................................................................................................................... BCalibration SummariesInstrumental Test Run Data

APPENDIX C. FLOW RATE AND MOISTURE DATA...................................................................................................... C

APPENDIX D. REFERENCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE TEST DATA .................................... DExample CalculationsPitot CalibrationMeterbox CalibrationsNO-NO2 Converter Efficiency TestCalibration Gas Certificates of Analysis

APPENDIX E. PROCESS DATA ............................................................................................................................................ E

APPENDIX F. PROTOCOL AND CORRESPONDENCES .............................................................................................. F

T


LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES

FIGURE 2.1-1 Pottstown Landfill – Flare Diagram..........................................................................................................................3TABLE 3.3-1 Flare #2 (C05) Compliance Test Results and Permitted Limits................................................................................5TABLE 4.1-1 REFERENCE METHOD ANALYZERS...................................................................................................................6TABLE 4.1-2 STRATIFICATION TABLE ........................................................................................................................................6TABLE 4.1.3-1. Cyclonic Flow Table................................................................................................................................................8FIGURE 4.1.3-1 Flare - EPA Method 1 Data Sheet ..........................................................................................................................9FIGURE 6.2-1 Example Calculations ..............................................................................................................................................12FIGURE 6.2-1 Example Calculations (Continued) .........................................................................................................................13

U


RMCEINC – Chicago Regional Office

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Company Information

Name & Mailing Address: FACILITYWaste Management Disposal Services of Pennsylvania, Inc.Pottstown Landfill1425 Sell RoadPottstown, Pennsylvania 19464

Contact: David MoreiraTitle: Environmental Manager

Telephone Number: (603) 929-5446Email: [email protected]

Permit Number: TVOP-46-00033Source to be tested: One (1) Enclosed Flare (C05)

1.2 Test Information

Test Requested By: Pottstown LandfillSource Contact: Mr. David Moreira

Telephone Number: (603) 929-5446

Test Objective: CFR, Title 40 Part 60, Compliance and Title V / State Operating Permit testingTest Methods: 1, 2, 3A, 4, 7E, 10 and 25A

Test Dates: October 5, 2011

Source Test Coordinators: Mr. David Moreira Waste Management Disposal Services ofPennsylvania, Inc.

On-Site RMCEINC Supervisor: Rachel Chleborowicz, RMC Environmental, Inc. (RMCEINC)

Laboratory Analysis: Ms. Jean Waite Core Laboratories, Inc.201 Deerwood Glenn DriveDeer Park, Texas 77536281-478-1300 Phone

2.0 EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION

2.1 Facility Description, Process Information, and Emission Source Description

A schematic of the flare is shown in Figure 2.1-1.

The flare testing is an ongoing compliance test for outlet NOx, CO, and NMOC. The flare (Enclosed Flare #2 (CO5)has a maximum design capacity of approximately 2,800 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) of landfill gas. Theflare testing will be conducted while the flare is operating at ~1000 cfm or as close to capacity as practicable giventhe volume of landfill gas available during the testing.

An EPA Method 1 data sheet for the flare is included in Figure 4.1.3-1. These and all measurements provided beforethe test team arrives on site will be verified and included in the final report.

V



FIGURE 2.1-1 Pottstown Landfill – Flare Diagram

Flare Stack InformationFlare 2(C05)

Shape of the test plane RoundInternal diameter 108”Reference sampling system approximate height (AGL) ~36’

W



3.0 SOURCE TEST PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

3.1 Test Contractor

Name and Address: RMC ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. (RMCEINC)9226 North 2nd Street, Suite DMachesney Park, Illinois 61115

Contact: Rachel Chleborowicz – Sr. Project ManagerTelephone Number: 815-378-6150 Mobile

815-425-1102 Fax [email protected]

3.2 Test Program Organization

Test Team Participants: Rachel Chleborowicz RMCEINC, Sr. Project ManagerAndrew McDermand RMCEINC, Team Leader

Site Coordinator: David Moreira Waste Management of Pennsylvania, Inc., EnvironmentalManager

Test Dates: October 5, 2011Project Number:

Pennsylvania StateObservers:

2011-16019

Mr. Richard SzerekesMs. Jillian Gallagher

PADEP - Department of Source Testing and MonitoringPADEP - Southeast Regional Office

3.3 Test Program Objectives

The test program evaluated the performance of one (1) landfill gas flare (Flare No. 2 (C05)). Sampling and analysisprocedures described in this document were conducted using procedures previously approved by the PennsylvaniaDepartment of Environmental Protection (PADEP) and the U.S. EPA.

Performance Testing for nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and non-methane organic compounds(NMOCs) was conducted according to the procedures of the Code of Federal Regulations; Title 40 Part 60, 25 Pa.Code Chapter 139, the Department’s Source Testing Manual and the source air permit (see Title V Permit, May 8,2006, Condition 6(b), page 53, Condition 7(a), page 57).

The test program for the enclosed flare was conducted to measure exhaust gas concentrations of outlet NOx, CO andNMOC. This flare testing was conducted while the unit operated at ~1000 CFM (+/- 10%).

WMDS retained RMC Environmental, Inc. of Machesney Park, Illinois to provide sampling and analytical support.RMC Environmental, Inc. was responsible for the collection of all gas samples.

The compliance program consisted of a series of four (4) test runs at the outlet of the flare. Each outlet test rundetermined the concentrations of oxygen (O2), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO),and non-methane organic compounds (NMOCs). All data is presented in Appendix B to this report but only three(3) runs are used for the calculation of the compliance results. Run 2 was omitted due to the NOx and CO failingthe final bias test. The analyzers were recalibrated and the test was continued with no other issue. Velocity andmoisture were also determined at the outlet locations utilizing EPA Method 1-4 and verified by EPA Method 19.

Table 3.3-1 present the compliance test data and operating parameters for the flare testing. It appears that allparameters met the requirements outlined in the applicable permits.

X



TABLE 3.3-1Flare #2 (C05) Compliance Test Results and Permitted Limits

Parameter Run 1 Run 3 Run 4 Average Permit Limit

Flare #2 (C05) – 10/5/2011

Run Times 1015-1115 1300-1400 1410-1510

% O2 13.8 14.0 13.7 13.8

% CO2 5.8 5.7 5.8 5.8

Moisture (%) 8.7 9.6 9.5 9.3

Velocity (ft/Sec) 19.8 20.3 19.2 19.8

Flow rates (DSCFM) 19,900 19,800 18,900 19,600

NOx ppm

NOx ppm @15% O2

NOx (lb/hr)

12.4

10.3

1.77

12.7

10.6

1.80

13.8

11.3

1.87

13.0

10.7

1.81

14.3 ppmv

None

3.93 lb/Hr

CO ppm

CO (lb/hr)

6.4

0.56

15.4

1.33

13.3

1.09

11.7

0.99

104.1 ppmv

17.39 lb/Hr

NMOC as C3H8 ppmvd

NMOC (ppmvd, as C6H14 @3% O2)

NMOC as C3H8 lb/Hr

< DL1

< DL

< DL

0.02

0.03

0.001

< DL

< DL

< DL

< DL

< DL

< DL

None

20 ppm as C6H14 @ 3% O2

None

FLARE OPERATING PARAMETERS

Fuel Flow (cfm) 939.8 916.4 920.6 925.6

Flare Temperature (OF) 1546 1544 1546 1546

Inlet Methane (%) 43.4 44.8 44.5 44.2

Heat Input (mmBtu / Hr) 24.77 24.91 24.87 24.87

1 Less than the detectable limit of the method

The compliance test program measured exhaust gas concentrations of NOx, CO, NMOC and O2/CO2 utilizing instrumentalmethods and flow rates and moisture utilizing wet methods, to demonstrate compliance with the issued permit and federalrequirements. RMCEINC used procedures that conform to the requirements of CFR; Title 40 Part 60, and EPA Test Methods1, 2, 3A, 4, 7E, 10 and 25A (CFR; Title 40 Part 60, Appendix A). The equipment and procedures RMCEINC used in meetingthese requirements are described below. Completed EPA Method 1 data sheet is included as FIGURE 4.1.3-1. Thecorresponding test data is presented in Appendices A, B & C.

The Compliance / Performance test was initiated on October 5, 2011and concluded on the same day.

A fuel sample was taken for ultimate/proximate analysis, for the Btu Value of the fuel and this analysis is contained inAppendix D.

Cyclonic flow within the stack was checked as defined by 40CFR60 and that data is presented Appendix D.

Y



4.0 REFERENCE TEST EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES

4.1 Instrumentation and Equipment Procedures

4.1.1 Instrumental (NOx, CO, NMOC and O2/CO2) Procedures

The test program includes the measurement of exhaust gas concentrations of NOx, CO, NMOC and O2. RMCEINC used theprocedures that conform to the requirements of Title 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, Methods 1, 2, 3A, 4, 7E, 10 and 25A/18.Each of the test runs included a minimum of one hour of continuous flue gas sampling. This sampling program consisted offour (4) runs due to Run 2 failing the final bias test for NOx and CO. The analyzers were recalibrated and the test wascontinued with no other issue

Concentration measurements of NOx, CO, NMOC and O2, were made according to EPA Methods 7E, 10 and 25A/18 usingthe analyzers listed in Table 4.1-1. Figure 4.1-2 is a schematic of the wet/dry extractive reference measurement gas samplingsystem used by RMCEINC. All components of the sampling system that contact the sample are stainless steel, glass, or Teflon.

RMCEINC used a standard probe sampling system. The manual sampling probe used was un-heated stainless steel tubing and3-way valve to provide a means of conducting the three-point traverse and calibration checks. The probe assembly wasconstructed of Type 316 stainless steel. At Pottstown Landfill, the stack temperature is over 600 degrees and the probe wasnot externally heated due to that excessive heat. A length of heated Teflon tubing, heated to over 300O F, was connected to theprobe and to a moisture removal chiller.

Before the moisture removal system, a portion of the wet effluent is diverted to the THC analyzer. This analyzer requires thesample to be unconditioned which allows for the full THC concentration in the sample to be analyzed. The NMOC results arenot corrected for bias or drift per EPA Method 25A.

TABLE 4.1-1 REFERENCE METHOD ANALYZERS

Parameter Analyzer AnalyticalTechnique

InstrumentSpan

NOx Thermo Environmental Model 42i Chemilluminescent 0-50 ppmCO Thermo Environmental Model 48i Gas Filter Correlation 0-16 or 30 ppm

NMOC Vig Industries – 20/2 Flame Ionization 0-30 ppm PropaneO2 Servomex 1440 Paramagnetic 0-21 %

CO2 Servomex 1440 Infrared 0-18 %

TABLE 4.1-2 STRATIFICATION TABLE

Source Sampling Location Pollutant TestedMaximum Deviation Difference,

(ppm) or (%)

Enclosed Landfill Gas Flare No. 2 Outlet

O2

NOX

CONMOC

1.35 % - O2

1.32 ppm – NOx0.46 ppm CO

0.77 ppm NMOC

EPA Method Requirement N/A N/A *%"

Z



FIGURE 4.1-2. Reference Method Gas Sampling System Diagram

4.1.2 Instrumental Analytical Data

RMCEINC performed test runs to measures the flue gas for NMOC, NOx and CO in terms of an emission rate (lb/Hr) as wellas corrected to either 3% O2 or 15% O2. A three-point (zero, mid-range, and high-range) analyzer calibration error check oneach reference analyzer was performed before initiating the testing. This check is conducted after final calibration adjustmentsare made by injecting the calibration gases directly into each gas analyzer and recording the responses on the reference dataacquisition system.

RMCEINC conducted zero and upscale calibration checks both before and after each test run in order to quantify measurementsystem calibration drift and sampling system bias. Upscale was either the low-, mid- or high-range gas, whichever most closelyapproximated the flue gas level. During these checks, the calibration gases were introduced into the sampling system through a3-way valve assembly at the probe outlet so that the calibration gases were analyzed in the same manner as the flue gassamples.

RMCEINC recorded the reference analyzer measurements as 1-minute and 60-minute averages on its DAS. All test runconcentration results were determined from the average gas concentrations measured during the run and adjusted based on thezero and upscale sampling system bias check results (Equation 7E-1 presented in Title 40 CFR Part 60, Method 7E, Section8). The reference NMOC, CO and NOx emission values in terms of pounds per hour (lb/Hr) were computed from each test runaverage of adjusted, dry basis NMOC, CO, NOx and percent O2 using the Title 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A, Methods 1- 4 andMethod 19.

The inlet methane concentrations were determined using the on site GC. A fuel sample was taken for comparison to the on-siteGEM 2000 and an ultimate / proximate analysis was conducted by Core Laboratories, Inc. out of Houston, Texas. This data ispresented in Appendix E, along with the other process parameters collected during the test runs.

The volumetric flow rate testing (Title 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Methods 1-4), was conducted simultaneously with the testing,and used to calculate the emission rate in terms of lb/Hr.

4.1.3 Volumetric Flow Rates

RMCEINC determined the number and location of the traverse points for volumetric flow rate measurement according to theprocedures outlined in EPA Method 1. When determining the location and number of sample points, RMCEINC took into

RQ



account the number of sample ports, duct configuration, and location of upstream and downstream flow disturbances. Figure4.1.3-1 is the EPA Method 1 data sheet for the flare.

The flue gas velocity and volumetric flow rate were determined according to the procedures of EPA Method 2. A Type S pitottube with a Type K thermocouple was used to measure velocity pressure and stack gas temperature at each sample point. EachPitot tube conformed to the geometric specifications of EPA Method 2 and was assigned a coefficient of 0.84. An umbilicalcord connected the Pitot tube to the meter box inclined manometer and digital temperature readout. RMCEINC leak-checkedthe Pitot tube prior to and after conducting the flow rate traverses.

Table 4.1.3-1 provides the cyclonic flow data for the Flare.

TABLE 4.1.3-1. Cyclonic Flow Table

SourcesSamplingLocation

Stack DiameterUpstream Duct

DiameterDownstream Duct

DiameterAverage Angular

Flow

Landfill Gas Flare No. 2 Outlet 108” 4.11 1.00 3.63

EPA Method 1 Requirement N/A N/A +&"()"'2 +$"()"'"0.5 *$#"

RMCEINC determined the flue gas composition and molecular weight using EPA Methods 3A and 4 procedures.

4.1.4 Fuel Analysis Testing (EPA Method 19)

Gas bombs, small stainless steel pressure vessels, were collected for BTU Content, inlet landfill gas methane, oxygen, carbondioxide, and nitrogen content as well as the determination of an F-Factor for the site. The results were used to verify theconstants in the lb/Hr calculations.

The raw gas analysis data is included in Appendix D.

RR



FIGURE 4.1.3-1 Flare - EPA Method 1 Data Sheet

RS



4.2 Test Methods

Test methods used during the test project are described within the sections 4.1.1 – 4.1.4 above.

4.3 Analytical Methods

Analytical methods used during the test project are described within the sections 4.1.1 – 4.1.4 above.

4.4 Sampling Site Location

Section 2.1 above provides a detail description of the testing location. Figure 2.1-1 provides a diagram of the Flare stack.EPA Method 1 data sheet for the flare is included in Figure 4.1.3-1.

4.5 Sample Matrix

The sample matrix used during the test project is described within the sections 4.1.1 – 4.1.43 above.

5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION

RMCEINC followed the calibration and quality assurance procedures of EPA Methods 1, 2, 3A, 4, 7E, 10, 19 and 25Athroughout the test program. The maintenance for our meterboxes, probes, analyzers and a majority of our other testequipment is performed off site by either Clean Air Engineering or Millenium Instruments. These companies ensure thatour equipment is operating correctly and within the specification of the respective methods. All equipment is calibrated inaccordance with the EPA Methods and guidelines.

The results of sampling system bias and calibration drift tests for each test run are calculated and presented in the testreport. Cylinder gases used during the testing are certified to meet or exceed EPA Protocol 1 requirements. The meter boxcalibrations, pitot tube inspections, calibration gas certificates of analysis and the analyzer quality assurance checks areincluded in Appendix D.

RMCEINC uses computers throughout the test program. Spreadsheets and software programs are checked in our officefor accuracy. Software used by RMCEINC is structured to eliminate human errors in data entry where possible byautomating the process. When possible RMCEINC, inputs field data directly into the DAS system and eliminates the handwritten field data sheets. These systems provide an accurate measurement of the raw test data and are not used to modifyor change test data in any manner. Equations used in these systems are taken directly from the CFR when possible andnotations are provided if originated from an alternate source or customized in any manner.

The laboratory utilized for this test program is a NELAP Certified Laboratory. A copy of the chain of custody for this testprogram is included in Appendix D.

6.0 SOURCE TEST REPORT

6.1 Report Format

This final report, which follows the format defined within the protocol approved by the State of Pennsylvania. All fielddata, calculations, and QA documentation will be included within the appendices of this report.

6.2 Data Reduction Procedures/ Methods

The reduction procedures presented in “Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection – Source SamplingManual”, were followed. In 1994 most of the data reduction (validation) was completed by hand and thus a writtenprocedure was required in order to ensure that the data was handled and validated properly. Although some testingcompanies today still utilize this old method, RMCEINC utilizes, through the use of computers, an automated datareduction/validation procedure, thus eliminating the potential of errors that the old method was known. This automatedsystem was developed in 1996 by a third party and has been continually verified each year though its use at severalhundred test projects.

RT



Figure 6.2-1 and 6.2-2 include several example calculations that were used during the test project. Example calculationsof an actual test runs are included in Appendix D.

RU



FIGURE 6.2-1 Example Calculations

RV



FIGURE 6.2-1 Example Calculations (Continued)

RW



APPENDIX A. REFERENCE DATA SUMMARIES

RX

RE

FE

RE

NC

ED

AT

ASU

MM

AR

Y

Co

mp

an

y:W

aste

Man

agem

ent

-P

ott

sto

wn

Lan

dfil

lD

ate:

10/

5/20

11

Sou

rce:

Fla

re#

2P

roje

ct#:

201

1-1

6019

Tes

tD

ura

tio

n

4:5

50

VO

CA

sP

rop

ane

Sta

rtE

nd

O2-

1C

O2

-1C

O-1

NO

x-1

VO

C-1

CO

NO

Xas

Hex

CO

-1N

Ox

-1V

OC

-1D

SC

FM

Tim

eT

ime

%%

pp

mp

pm

pp

mF

LA

RE

TE

ST

ING

(C0

5)F

LA

RE

TE

ST

ING

(C05

)

110

/5/2

011

10:

151

1:15

13.7

85.

776.

4012

.41

-1.3

15.

3010

.28

-1.6

50.

013

0.0

41-0

.00

119

913.

00:

102

10/5

/201

11

1:25

12:

2513

.74

5.82

9.66

13.0

3-1

.21

7.96

10.7

4-1

.52

0.0

200.

043

-0.0

01

1915

9.0

0:35

310

/5/2

011

13:

001

4:00

14.0

35.

7215

.37

12.6

70.

0213

.20

10.8

70.

030.

032

0.0

440.

000

1984

1.0

0:10

410

/5/2

011

14:

101

5:10

13.6

85.

8313

.26

13.7

7-0

.02

10.8

411

.25

-0.0

30.

027

0.0

450.

000

1893

1.0

51

6:16

61

7:22

71

8:28

81

9:34

92

0:40

102

1:46

112

2:52

122

3:58

131

:04

142

:10

153

:16

AV

ER

AG

E13

.81

5.79

11.6

812

.95

-0.6

39.

3210

.79

#R

EF

!-0

.79

0.0

240.

044

-0.0

01

Sta

rtE

nd

O2-

1C

O2

-1C

O-1

VO

C-1

CO

-1N

Ox

-1T

HC

NM

OC

CO

-1N

Ox

-1V

OC

-1N

MO

CH

eat

Inp

ut

Tim

eT

ime

%w

%w

wp

pm

wp

pm

ww

FL

AR

ET

ES

TIN

G(C

05)

FL

AR

ET

ES

TIN

G(C

05)

110

/5/2

011

10:

151

1:15

12.5

85.

275.

84-1

.20

0.00

0.22

0.70

-0.0

20.

080.

561.

77-0

.05

0.20

24.7

7

210

/5/2

011

11:

251

2:25

12.4

75.

288.

77-1

.10

0.00

0.32

0.71

-0.0

20.

110.

811.

79-0

.04

0.29

24.9

93

10/5

/201

11

3:00

14:

0012

.68

5.17

13.8

90.

020.

000.

530.

710

.00

0.19

1.33

1.80

0.0

010.

4924

.91

410

/5/2

011

14:

101

5:10

12.3

85.

2812

.00

-0.0

21.

091.

870.

0024

.87

51

6:16

61

7:22

71

8:28

81

9:34

92

0:40

102

1:46

112

2:52

122

3:58

131

:04

142

:10

153

:16

AV

ER

AG

E12

.53

5.25

10.1

2#D

IV/0

!-0

.58

0.00

0.42

0.71

-0.0

10.

150.

991.

81-0

.01

0.39

T/M

4.97

0.99

0.50

lbs/

Hr

R U N #

C A L

Wet

base

dm

easu

rem

ents

corr

ecte

dfr

om

DA

TA

Lo

gger

g/H

P-H

r

DA

TA

Lin

kfr

om

the

DA

TA

Lo

gger

pp

m@

15%

O2

pp

m@

3%O

2lb

s/m

mB

tu

RM

CE

nvi

ron

men

tal,

Inc.

RY



APPENDIX B. INSTRUMENTAL TEST DATA

COMPUTER RECORDED INSTRUMENTAL

CALIBRATIONS AND MEASUREMENTS

RZ

CEM Traverse PointsCompany: Waste Management - Pottstown Landfill Date: 10/5/2011

Sampling Location: Flare #2 - Stack Exit Project #: 2011-16019

Stratification NStack Dia. (in) Nipple (in) Wet Scrubber N

108 1 Two Gas Streams N

Dia. < 2.4 Meters N

STANDARD TRAVERSE MEASUREMENTS

Traverse PointsRequirement Dist.

from Inside Wall

1 16.7%

2 50.0%

3 83.3%

SHORT TRAVERSE MEASUREMENTS

Traverse Points

Requirement Dist.

from Inside Wall

1 0.4 m

2 1.2 m

3 2.0 m

Select

Short

TraverseY

SHORT Traverse Allowed

Length (ft-in)

1' 4-3/4"

4' 0-1/4"6' 7-3/4"

1' 7"

4' 7"7' 7"

Length (ft-in)

3 2.0 m

SHORT Traverse Used

6' 7-3/4"

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

1

2

3

T

ra

ve

r

s

e

P

o

i

n

t

Distance of Traverse Points From Inside Wall

STANDARD TRAVERSE MEASUREMENTS SHORT TRAVERSE MEASUREMENTS

RMC Environmental, Inc.

SQ

AFPQ ?RL ' 2FHIL$ @A?1A1 BFOPIML ($&'

=NFOCQMO0 ?;3 5LSIOMLKFLQCJ" 8LD$

>JCLQ <CKF0 >MQQPQMTL 3JMPFE @IQF 9CLEGIJJ

9MDCQIML0 6JCOF AFPQILH

=(#' 3=(#' 3=#' <=U#' B=3#'

! ! NNK NNK NNK

@QCOQ 1SFOCHILH

'&%*%(&'' '+0)*0), '($-+ '($- )$.,, '+$'. ($/.

'&%*%(&'' '+0)+0)- '($,-, '($-', &$+)+ ')$+* ($-((

'&%*%(&'' '+0),0), '($).+ '($-/, &$.+) ')$.() '$)(- 1B5?175P

'&%*%(&'' '+0)-0), '($*'' '($.'' &$*') '*$&+, ($/'' '($+' '($.) &$-- ')$.( ($*-

'&%*%(&'' '+0).0)- '($)). '($./ #&$(+) ')$/'. ($+* #&$,.

'&%*%(&'' '+0)/0), '($+)- '($/(+ #&$&&) ')$(+) ($*'/

'&%*%(&'' '+0*&0)- '($+&' '($/,) #&$&&( '($/./ ($*'/

1SFOCHF (&' PCKNJFP '($+'. '($.)' #&$&(+ ')$-/* ($*-*

@QCOQ 1SFOCHILH

'&%*%(&'' '+0*'0), '($+)* '($//* #&$&&) '($,), ($)//

'&%*%(&'' '+0*(0), '($(*) ')$&,) #&$&&) '($(). ($*--

'&%*%(&'' '+0*)0)- '($).) ')$'(- #&$&&( ''$+-* ($,'/ 1B5?175P

'&%*%(&'' '+0**0), '($' ')$'.* #&$&&( '($)*, ($,)/ '($(+ ')$'- &$&& '($.' ($,(

'&%*%(&'' '+0*+0)- '($(,( ')$(), #&$&&( ')$+-- ($,-,

'&%*%(&'' '+0*,0)+ '($'(+ ')$(/, #&$&&) ')$,)- ($,(/

'&%*%(&'' '+0*-0), '($'&) ')$)&* #&$&&( ')$,+( ($./.

'&%*%(&'' '+0*.0)- '($)-' ')$)++ #&$&&( ')$+&+ )$*')

1SFOCHF ((, PCKNJFP '($(,) ')$'// #&$&&( '($./. ($-()

@QCOQ 1SFOCHILH

'&%*%(&'' '+0*/0), '($+&- ')$)/( #&$&&( '($/,* )$-+/

'&%*%(&'' '+0+&0)- ')$*.- ')$**, #&$&&) ''$/-' ($/)*

'&%*%(&'' '+0+'0)+ '($., ')$*.) #&$&&) ''$((( ($+*' 1B5?175P

'&%*%(&'' '+0+(0), '($*&- ')$+)' #&$&&) '($/') ($,-+ '($,. ')$+' &$&& '($+& ($/*

'&%*%(&'' '+0+)0)- '($*., ')$+.+ #&$&&) '($.'+ )$&'.

'&%*%(&'' '+0+*0), '($)*) ')$,' #&$&&) ')$'** ($-'*

AFPQ ?RL ' 5LE

1SFOCHF '-& PCKNJFP '($,., ')$+&/ #&$&&) '($+&( ($/), ! 4FSICQIML

'$), +$& (+.+-$' #'&$, '+$-

NNK 4IGGFOFLDF

&$-- '$)( &$*,

SR

2ENMFSEUMQP 4SSQS AITU EU ?VP ' $ @A?1A1 CISTMQP ($&'

=RISEUQS0 ?;2 4PWMSQPOIPUEN" 8PG$

>NEPU <EOI0 >QUUTUQXP 2NQTIH @MUI 9EPHJMNN

9QGEUMQP0 5NESI AITUMPK

?IJISIPGI 2ZNMPHIS <VOFIST

DISQ 9QX#SEPKI ;MH#SEPKI 7MKL#SEPKI

=(#' 22(+..,) 22))--&- 22'*--,&

2=(#' 22(+..,) 22))--&- 22'*--,&

2=#' 22))--&- 19;&'(&), 19;&(.&+* @6/'(),&)

<=Y#' 22))--&- 119,&-, 22(+..,) @6/'+'&/&

C=2#' 22))--&- 19;&(*)-' 119'*,+- 19;&*&'+(

3EUI%AMOI '&%+%(&'' /0(&0(/ >1@@43

1PENZUI =(#' 2=(#' 2=#' <=Y#' C=2#'

BPMUT ! ! RRO RRO RRO

DISQ ?IJ 2ZN &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&&

DISQ 1WK &$(+ &$&+ &$&. &$(+ &$()

DISQ 4SSQS! '$(& &$)& &$'& &$+& &$+&

9QX ?IJ 2ZN /$&& /$&- +$&&

9QX 1WK /$*- /$(& +$'&

9QX 4SSQS! &$.& &$)& &$(&

;MH ?IJ 2ZN '($*( /$*' '+$&& (&$*+ .$,-

;MH 1WK '($+( /$(( '+$', (&$+, .$,+

;MH 4SSQS! &$+& '$&& &$)& &$(& &$&&

7MKL ?IJ 2ZN (&$.+ ',$/. (/$&& +'$-, '*$--

7MKL 1WK (&$-. ',$// (.$+) +($,/ '*$-*

7MKL 4SSQS! &$)& &$'& &$.& '$/& &$'&

SS

7PLULDN ?ZTUHO 2LDT 3KHFM IQS >VP ' $ ?@>1@1 BHSTLQP ($&'

<RHSDUQS0 >93 5PWLSQPOHPUDN" 7PF$

=NDPU ;DOH0 =QUUTUQXP 3NQTHG ?LUH 8DPGILNN

8QFDULQP0 6NDSH @HTULPJ

>HIHSHPFH 3ZNLPGHS ;VOEHST

CHSQ ?RDP

<(#' 33(+..,) 33))--&-

3<(#' 33(+..,) 33))--&-

3<#' 33))--&- 189&(.&+*

;<Y#' 33))--&- 33(+..,)

B<3#' 33))--&- 118'*,+-

4DUH%@LOH '&%+%(&'' '&0'&0*) =1??54

1PDNZUH <(#' 3<(#' 3<#' ;<Y#' B<3#'

APLUT ! ! RRO RRO RRO

CHSQ >HI 3ZN &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&&

CHSQ 3DN &$(+ &$&+ &$&. &$(+ &$()

CHSQ 1WJ &$.( &$&/ &$&& '$,) #&$''

CHSQ 2LDT! ($-& &$(& &$'& ($.& &$-&

CHSQ 4SLIU!

?RDP >HI 3ZN '($*( /$*' '+$&& (&$*+ .$,-

?RDP 3DN '($+( /$(( '+$', (&$+, .$,+

?RDP 1WJ '($,- /$'+ '*$&+ '/$,* /$'+

?RDP 2LDT! &$-& &$*& '$/& '$/& '$&&

?RDP 4SLIU!

ST

?DNO =PJ ' 2DFGJ$ >?=1?1 @DMNGKJ ($&'

;LDMAOKM0 =83 4JQGMKJIDJOAH" 6JB$

<HAJO 9AID0 <KOONOKRJ 3HKNDC >GOD 7AJCEGHH

7KBAOGKJ0 5HAMD ?DNOGJF

;(#' 3;(#' 3;#' 9;S#' @;3#'

! ! LLI LLI LLI

2DFGJ BAHBPHAOGJF MPJ AQDMAFDN

'&%+%(&'' '&0',0'+ ')$.*+ +$-'* +$-*+ ')$&+' #&$(-'

'&%+%(&'' '&0'-0'+ '*$)', +$))( /$)'. '($)*- #&$*-'

'&%+%(&'' '&0'.0'+ '*$&** +$+)( '&$+&) ''$/.' #'$'*)

'&%+%(&'' '&0'/0'+ '*$' +$+&, )$('/ '($'. #'$&,)

'&%+%(&'' '&0(&0'+ ')$-/* +$-*. *$/.- '($*.* #&$/

'&%+%(&'' '&0('0'+ ')$/)/ +$,)+ *$&'( '($))- #'$&-,

'&%+%(&'' '&0((0'+ ')$-') +$.() ($*(- '($/,' #&$+/

'&%+%(&'' '&0()0'+ '*$&, +$+(/ ''$*(/ '($,+, #&$')+

'&%+%(&'' '&0(*0'+ ')$.&( +$-+/ /$.)' '($-, #'$'.,

'&%+%(&'' '&0(+0'+ '*$',/ +$*** )$&/. '($+/( #&$./,

'&%+%(&'' '&0(,0'+ ')$/(/ +$,** .$&+' '($*(- #&$-).

'&%+%(&'' '&0(-0'+ ')$/). +$,(* /$(-' '($)(, #&$--/

'&%+%(&'' '&0(.0'+ ')$/&( +$,,* ''$(*- '($*. #&$/&-

'&%+%(&'' '&0(/0'+ ')$..+ +$,./ ($+&+ '($/. #&$.'.

'&%+%(&'' '&0)&0'+ '*$&,( +$+** )$&-( '($+'* #'$&,'

'&%+%(&'' '&0)'0'+ '*$&- +$+*( +$'(( '($(/- #&$&('

'&%+%(&'' '&0)(0'+ '*$'&( +$*/, ''$++) '($(-' #&$++.

'&%+%(&'' '&0))0'+ ')$/.' +$+/, ,$-*, '($))/ #'$))-

'&%+%(&'' '&0)*0', ')$,.( +$.+ &$&++ '($.)' #&$*(.

'&%+%(&'' '&0)+0', ')$-/, +$-+) ($)*- ')$)') #'$)&(

'&%+%(&'' '&0),0', ')$/*+ +$,,) '$*)+ ')$'*' #&$))

'&%+%(&'' '&0)-0', '*$''- +$*-/ *$..' '($)*) #&$,''

'&%+%(&'' '&0).0', ')$.+- +$-&' *$,&* '($,-) #&$,.'

'&%+%(&'' '&0)/0', '*$&.) +$+') *$+-* '($,'/ &$'&)

'&%+%(&'' '&0*&0', ')$.+. +$- ,$,+- '($+)( &$*'

'&%+%(&'' '&0*'0', ')$- +$.*( )$.,' ')$(&) #&$/,*

'&%+%(&'' '&0*(0', ')$/.. +$+/, ($/+, '($,)* #&$(

'&%+%(&'' '&0*)0', ')$. +$-)) )$/** '($++( #&$/(/

'&%+%(&'' '&0**0', ')$.)+ +$-() )$--' ')$&&' #&$/.(

'&%+%(&'' '&0*+0', ')$++) +$/.' &$/.. ')$'+- #&$/*,

'&%+%(&'' '&0*,0', '*$&)/ +$+- '$)-- ')$,'( #'$'.)

'&%+%(&'' '&0*-0'- '*$&-) +$+'- /$&&/ '($+(. #&$+/'

'&%+%(&'' '&0*.0'* ')$-/- +$-* )$,*( '($./ #&$-/(

'&%+%(&'' '&0*/0'+ ')$-(* +$.(' ($&, ')$&., #'$)+*

'&%+%(&'' '&0+&0'+ ')$/+( +$,&* ($'-/ '($/,' #'$(-(

'&%+%(&'' '&0+'0'+ '*$&,, +$+,) ($)(, ')$&,) #'$(&*

'&%+%(&'' '&0+(0'+ ')$/'( +$,+- -$&+( '($),) #'$'+.

'&%+%(&'' '&0+)0'+ ')$/' +$,-, )$)&( ')$&-+ #&$-&,

'&%+%(&'' '&0+*0'+ ')$.,. +$,/' *$*)/ '($.+- #'$),

'&%+%(&'' '&0++0'+ ')$-/( +$-- ($*+ ')$',' #'$&*+

SU

'&%+%(&'' '&0+,0'+ ')$,') +$/'- '$'-. ')$('- #'$&.

'&%+%(&'' '&0+-0'+ ')$..* +$-(, &$++- ')$/&. #&$-**

'&%+%(&'' '&0+.0'+ '*$&*+ +$+*( ''$.,' '($*., #&$'&)

'&%+%(&'' '&0+/0'+ '*$&+* +$+*- .$'-) '($++* #&$-/-

'&%+%(&'' ''0&&0'+ '*$*(( +$(,) /$+&, '($*'* #&$/(*

'&%+%(&'' ''0&'0'+ ')$..' +$,,- '*$/,+ '($)/- #&$)/'

'&%+%(&'' ''0&(0'+ '*$&)+ +$+, -$'*) ')$'/- #&$(-,

'&%+%(&'' ''0&)0'+ ')$-(( +$.-( -$', ')$)+) #&$/&-

'&%+%(&'' ''0&*0'+ ')$/++ +$,') )$+-+ ')$((, #'$'-*

'&%+%(&'' ''0&+0'+ '*$(., +$),+ *$*/. '($,-' #'$*&,

'&%+%(&'' ''0&,0'+ '*$'+- +$**' '&$/', '($')- #'$)(/

'&%+%(&'' ''0&-0'+ '*$&&, +$+.. *$/+, '($-.* #&$-.)

'&%+%(&'' ''0&.0'+ '*$&&/ +$+./ *$)*, '($+- #'$'+,

'&%+%(&'' ''0&/0'+ '*$(,- +$),/ ,$,/' '($++) #&$'.+

'&%+%(&'' ''0'&0'* '*$&)( +$+,( '($&)) '($+* #&$)&-

'&%+%(&'' ''0''0'* ')$/*. +$,(. ($).* '($/&, #&$/'/

'&%+%(&'' ''0'(0'+ ')$.*/ +$,.. ,$&&. ')$&,/ #'$&+*

'&%+%(&'' ''0')0'+ ')$-( +$-.. ,$&, ')$''- #&$-.,

'&%+%(&'' ''0'*0'+ ')$/- +$+.+ -$*+' ')$&,+ #&$./+

'&%+%(&'' ''0'+0'+ ')$-(- +$-.- '&$(() '($/,) #&$//.

1QDMAFD KE ?DNO =PJ ;(#' 3;(#' 3;#' 9;S#' @;3#'

! ! LLI LLI LLI

'&%+%(&'' ''0'+0'+ ')$/*) +$,)* +$,,) '($-,( #&$-/+

?DNO =PJ ' 4JC

SV

6LPDN ?ZTUHO 2LDT 3KHFM IQS >VP ' $ ?@>1@1 BHSTLQP ($&'





CHSQ ?RDP

<(#' 33(+..,) 33))--&-

3<(#' 33(+..,) 33))--&-

3<#' 33))--&- 189&(.&+*

;<Y#' 33))--&- 33(+..,)

B<3#' 33))--&- 118'*,+-

4DUH%@LOH '&%+%(&'' ''0((0)/ =1??54

1PDNZUH <(#' 3<(#' 3<#' ;<Y#' B<3#'


CHSQ >HI 3ZN &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&&

CHSQ 3DN &$(+ &$&+ &$&. &$(+ &$()

CHSQ 1WJ &$.- &$'& &$&& ($*- &$*(

CHSQ 2LDT! ($/& &$(& &$'& *$*& &$*&

CHSQ 4SLIU! &$(& &$'& &$&& '$-& '$'&

?RDP >HI 3ZN '($*( /$*' '+$&& (&$*+ .$,-

?RDP 3DN '($+( /$(( '+$', (&$+, .$,+

?RDP 1WJ '($,* /$'' '($+( '/$-, .$*(

?RDP 2LDT! &$,& &$,& *$*& '$,& &$*&

?RDP 4SLIU! #&$'& #&$(& #($+& &$)& #'$*&

7PL CHSQ 1WJ &$.( &$&/ &$&& '$,) #&$''

7PL ?RDP 1WJ '($,- /$'+ '*$&+ '/$,* /$'+

>VP 1WJ ')$/* +$,) +$,, '($-, #&$.&

3Q &$.+ &$&/ &$&& ($&+ &$',

3O '($,+ /$') ')$(. '/$-& .$-/

3QSSHFU 1WJ ')$-. +$-- ,$*& '($*' #&$/+

SW

@EOP >QK ) 3EGHK% ?@>2@2 AENOHLK )%'(

<MENBPLN1 >94 5KRHNLKJEKPBI# 7KC%

=IBKP ;BJE1 =LPPOPLSK 4ILOED ?HPE 8BKDFHII

8LCBPHLK1 6IBNE @EOPHKG

<)$( 4<)$( 4<$( ;<T$( A<4$(

! ! MMJ MMJ MMJ

3EGHK CBICQIBPHKG NQK BRENBGEO

('&,&)'(( ((1)-1*0 (*%-() ,%/-) ('%(.0 (*%',/ $'%0)0

('&,&)'(( ((1).1*/ (*%0+( ,%-(( (%(,, (*%.(, $'%0)(

('&,&)'(( ((1)/1*/ (+%'.. ,%+-/ 0%'-* ()%.'* $'%/,+

('&,&)'(( ((1)01*. (+%'** ,%,*0 +%+)0 ()%0+. $(%)/)

('&,&)'(( ((1*'1*. (*%0,* ,%,. 0%-'/ ()%--) $(%'.(

('&,&)'(( ((1*(1*. (*%/-+ ,%-- ,%*.* (*%((( $'%,'/

('&,&)'(( ((1*)1*0 (*%/,/ ,%-./ +%.'( (*%+*) $'%.,+

('&,&)'(( ((1**1*/ (*%0*( ,%,/) +%00. (*%)*. $(%(0-

('&,&)'(( ((1*+1*/ (+%((. ,%+-- +%*-, (*%(-. $'%./0

('&,&)'(( ((1*,1*/ (*%0*+ ,%,.- (/%0*, ()%-(( $'%.+.

('&,&)'(( ((1*-1*/ (*%-+ ,%/,- 0%,+* (*%,.* $'%+/+

('&,&)'(( ((1*.1*/ (*%0,0 ,%-') (%*.( (*%--/ $'%.+)

('&,&)'(( ((1*/1*0 (+%')( ,%,(, /%+'/ ()%.() $(%*,+

('&,&)'(( ((1*01*0 (*%0./ ,%,./ ,%)-. (*%'+( $(%)0*

('&,&)'(( ((1+'1*. (*%0'+ ,%-/+ )%-( (*%*+* $(%(/0

('&,&)'(( ((1+(1*. (*%-+* ,%/.) )%*/, (*%))/ '%',(

('&,&)'(( ((1+)1*0 (+%'*/ ,%,-( )%*'. (*%.,0 $'%0)+

('&,&)'(( ((1+*1*0 (*%-( ,%/// (+%('/ (*%'-+ $'%0'.

('&,&)'(( ((1++1*0 (*%+*- -%'-* )%000 (+%*+/ $'%,(/

('&,&)'(( ((1+,1*/ (*%0(. ,%-*( '%,+( (+%')/ '%)*

('&,&)'(( ((1+-1*/ (+%+)) ,%)'. ('%,*( ()%.0) $'%++/

('&,&)'(( ((1+.1*/ (+%(+. ,%+*( (-%*+. ()%*(+ $(%*00

('&,&)'(( ((1+/1*0 (*%0,0 ,%-'+ .%0*0 (*%*+) $'%',(

('&,&)'(( ((1+01*. (*%0-* ,%,/* -%0() ()%0( $(%)-*

('&,&)'(( ((1,'1*. (+%)'* ,%+'. /%))( (*%((. $'%./(

('&,&)'(( ((1,(1*. (*%0(0 ,%--0 (/%)++ (*%(/. $'%..)

('&,&)'(( ((1,)1*. (+%) ,%*.. ()%00* ()%.. $(%*+0

('&,&)'(( ((1,*1*. (+%(+* ,%+,( +%+0* ()%/+, $(%*.0

('&,&)'(( ((1,+1*. (*%0/0 ,%-+, 0%*+( ()%0.0 $'%,)-

('&,&)'(( ((1,,1*. (+%'*/ ,%0)) )%/(, (*%(-, $'%+++

('&,&)'(( ((1,-1*. (+%',* ,%,- (.%.(( ()%./0 $'%/,(

('&,&)'(( ((1,.1*. (+%))* ,%+)* /%)-- (*%(/0 $'%*)+

('&,&)'(( ((1,/1*/ (+%*(* ,%*'( *(%(,, ()%-.. $(%(*,

('&,&)'(( ((1,01*/ (*%-0- ,%/'0 (*%,, (*%)+) $'%(',

('&,&)'(( ()1''1*/ (+%'- ,%,(. ,%+') (*%./0 $'%/*,

('&,&)'(( ()1'(1*/ (*%)-0 -%*+ )%,)/ (+%'-- $'%0/

('&,&)'(( ()1')1*/ (+%(/0 ,%.++ (%00+ (+%)-- $(%)+-

('&,&)'(( ()1'*1*/ (+%'*- ,%-)) .%')* (*%*', $(%'/+

('&,&)'(( ()1'+1*/ (+%)/, ,%*., ()%/0 (*%'+- $'%+0*

('&,&)'(( ()1',1*/ (*%.0, -%(-+ ((%)., (*%(0. $'%0+)

SX

('&,&)'(( ()1'-1*/ (+%(*/ -%'/, 0%)) (*%.-+ $(%(0

('&,&)'(( ()1'.1*0 (*%0,( -%+', 0%/)/ (*%+'/ $(%),(

('&,&)'(( ()1'/1*. (+%'0* -%,, .%.0- (*%*-) $'%---

('&,&)'(( ()1'01*. (*%/+) -%0*+ ('%,+ (+%',) $(%(/+

('&,&)'(( ()1('1*. (+%', -%,, ,%*+ (*%/)+ $(%)+(

('&,&)'(( ()1((1*. (*%/*( -%+- *%'+* (*%0.( $(%)./

('&,&)'(( ()1()1*. (+%(. ,%..0 )%(/) (*%.,. $(%*(+

('&,&)'(( ()1(*1*. (+%((. ,%.,, 0%.*+ (*%+*, '%'*0"

('&,&)'(( ()1(+1*. (*%.., -%',+ (.%(') (*%,*/ $'%0(*

('&,&)'(( ()1(,1*. (*%0* ,%0'+ )%-( (+%'(. $'%.'(

('&,&)'(( ()1(-1*. (*%.0, -%'+/ )%(', (+%'+. $(%'+,

('&,&)'(( ()1(.1*/ (+%'.. ,%..0 )%((/ (+%)+- $'%.0*

('&,&)'(( ()1(/1*/ (+%'*. ,%/). -%/+/ (*%*,( $'%0.*

('&,&)'(( ()1(01*/ (+%''0 ,%/-* *%/+* (+%('- $(%*.(

('&,&)'(( ()1)'1*/ (+%*), ,%,/) +%.* (*%-)- $(%(*0

('&,&)'(( ()1)(1*/ (+%''/ ,%/.* /%-)0 (*%-() $'%0((

('&,&)'(( ()1))1*. (+%'(0 ,%/./ -%'.0 (*%,.+ $'%-./

('&,&)'(( ()1)*1*. (+%(0) ,%../ -%,0+ (+%'-) $'%-+,

('&,&)'(( ()1)+1*. (+%(/. ,%.,( *%*+) (*%0() $(%(

('&,&)'(( ()1),1*/ (+%(0- ,%-/+ ()%+)* (*%*'0 $(%*(+

2RENBGE LF @EOP >QK <)$( 4<)$( 4<$( ;<T$( A<4$(

! ! MMJ MMJ MMJ

('&,&)'(( ()1),1*/ (*%0/, ,%.-, .%.-. (*%*0 $'%/.("

@EOP >QK ) 5KD

SY

6LPDN ?ZTUHO 2LDT 3KHFM IQS >VP ( $ ?@>1@1 BHSTLQP ($&'





CHSQ ?RDP

<(#' 33(+..,) 33))--&-

3<(#' 33(+..,) 33))--&-

3<#' 33))--&- 189&(.&+*

;<Y#' 33))--&- 33(+..,)

B<3#' 33))--&- 118'*,+-

4DUH%@LOH '&%+%(&'' '(0*&0(. 617854

1PDNZUH <(#' 3<(#' 3<#' ;<Y#' B<3#'


CHSQ >HI 3ZN &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&&

CHSQ 3DN &$(+ &$&+ &$&. &$(+ &$()

CHSQ 1WJ &$/& &$&/ &$&& &$++ #&$+/

CHSQ 2LDT! )$'& &$(& &$'& &$,& '$,&

CHSQ 4SLIU! &$(& &$&& &$&& #)$.& #($&&

?RDP >HI 3ZN '($*( /$*' '+$&& (&$*+ .$,-

?RDP 3DN '($+( /$(( '+$', (&$+, .$,+

?RDP 1WJ '($.' /$*& ''$,& (&$+* /$*'

?RDP 2LDT! '$*& '$&& +$/& &$&& '$+&

?RDP 4SLIU! &$.& '$,& #'$+& '$,& ($&&

7PL CHSQ 1WJ &$.- &$'& &$&& ($*- &$*(

7PL ?RDP 1WJ '($,* /$'' '($+( '/$-, .$*(

>VP 1WJ ')$// +$-- -$-- ')$)/ #&$.-

3Q &$./ &$&/ &$&& '$+' #&$&/

3O '($-( /$(+ '($&, (&$'+ .$/(

3QSSHFU 1WJ ')$-* +$.( /$,,' 6 ')$&) #&$-,

SZ

2ENMFSEUMQP 4SSQS AITU EU ?VP ) $ @A?1A1 CISTMQP ($&'

=RISEUQS0 ?;2 4PWMSQPOIPUEN" 8PG$

>NEPU <EOI0 >QUUTUQXP 2NQTIH @MUI 9EPHJMNN

9QGEUMQP0 5NESI AITUMPK

?IJISIPGI 2ZNMPHIS <VOFIST

DISQ 9QX#SEPKI ;MH#SEPKI 7MKL#SEPKI

=(#' 22(+..,) 22))--&- 22'*--,&

2=(#' 22(+..,) 22))--&- 22'*--,&

2=#' 22))--&- 19;&'(&), 19;&(.&+* @6/'(),&)

<=Y#' 22))--&- 119,&-, 22(+..,) @6/'+'&/&

C=2#' 22))--&- 19;&(*)-' 119'*,+- 19;&*&'+(

3EUI%AMOI '&%+%(&'' '(0+*0(( >1@@43

1PENZUI =(#' 2=(#' 2=#' <=Y#' C=2#'

BPMUT ! ! RRO RRO RRO

DISQ ?IJ 2ZN &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&&

DISQ 1WK &$&, &$&- &$&& &$*( #&$')

DISQ 4SSQS! &$)& &$*& &$&& &$.& &$)&

9QX ?IJ 2ZN /$&& /$&- +$&&

9QX 1WK .$,+ .$.& +$'*

9QX 4SSQS! &$,& &$+& &$)&

;MH ?IJ 2ZN '($*( /$*' '+$&& (&$*+ .$,-

;MH 1WK '($*. /$)' '+$*+ '/$/- .$+/

;MH 4SSQS! &$)& &$+& &$-& '$&& &$(&

7MKL ?IJ 2ZN (&$.+ ',$/. (/$&& +'$-, '*$--

7MKL 1WK (&$,& ',$-( (/$)/ +'$&. '*$,'

7MKL 4SSQS! '$(& '$*& &$-& '$*& &$)&

TQ

7PLULDN ?ZTUHO 2LDT 3KHFM IQS >VP ) $ ?@>1@1 BHSTLQP ($&'





CHSQ ?RDP

<(#' 33(+..,) 33))--&-

3<(#' 33(+..,) 33))--&-

3<#' 33))--&- 189&(.&+*

;<Y#' 33))--&- 33(+..,)

B<3#' 33))--&- 118'*,+-

4DUH%@LOH '&%+%(&'' '(0+/0+' =1??54

1PDNZUH <(#' 3<(#' 3<#' ;<Y#' B<3#'


CHSQ >HI 3ZN &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&&

CHSQ 3DN &$&, &$&- &$&& &$*( #&$')

CHSQ 1WJ #&$&, &$&- &$&& ($(, #&$*)

CHSQ 2LDT! &$,& &$'& &$&& )$-& &$,&

CHSQ 4SLIU!

?RDP >HI 3ZN '($*( /$*' '+$&& (&$*+ .$,-

?RDP 3DN '($*. /$)' '+$*+ '/$/- .$+/

?RDP 1WJ '($*/ /$'* '*$(. (&$(+ .$/)

?RDP 2LDT! &$&& '$&& '$/& &$,& &$-&

?RDP 4SLIU!

TR

@EOP >QK * 3EGHK% ?@>2@2 AENOHLK )%'(




<)$( 4<)$( 4<$( ;<T$( A<4$(

! ! MMJ MMJ MMJ


('&,&)'(( (*1'(1,- (*%0/+ ,%,+) (.%)'. ((%/-/ '%)+-"

('&,&)'(( (*1')1,, (+%(0 ,%*,* (.%,-. ()%+/. '%-((

('&,&)'(( (*1'*1,, (*%.-+ ,%.)/ (/%,/, ()%-/, $'%)'0

('&,&)'(( (*1'+1,, (*%0/* ,%,). ,%(/, ()%0) $'%))(

('&,&)'(( (*1',1,, (*%/*, ,%--/ ('%,-. ()%.,/ $'%*+/

('&,&)'(( (*1'-1,+ (*%-0- ,%..+ (*%-)/ (*%('+ $'%,)+

('&,&)'(( (*1'.1,- (*%.,0 ,%.*, (*%*,, (*%(.0 '%*'.

('&,&)'(( (*1'/1,, (*%/'0 ,%--) (-%0, (*%-*- '%',)

('&,&)'(( (*1'01,, (*%//, ,%-)* .%'/ (*%*(* '%.'.

('&,&)'(( (*1('1,+ (+%'(/ ,%,(, ((%,0* (*%(+/ '%+'.

('&,&)'(( (*1((1,+ (*%,/0 ,%/,- )'%)+0 ()%0(. (%'.-

('&,&)'(( (*1()1,+ (*%-'+ ,%/-( -%(- (+%'*( $'%(.)

('&,&)'(( (*1(*1,, (*%0./ ,%,+/ )%,*. (*%-+ $'%-(,"

('&,&)'(( (*1(+1,+ (*%.*. ,%.)- ('%-(+ ()%/0- '%''/

('&,&)'(( (*1(,1,- (+%')* ,%+0/ .%*'* (*%+,* '%+'0

('&,&)'(( (*1(-1,- (+%)*( ,%*', *-%'() ()%,-) (

('&,&)'(( (*1(.1,, (*%,0) ,%/-- )*%'+- ()%0// $'%,//

('&,&)'(( (*1(/1,, (*%.- ,%.(0 *%,+ (*%0*, $'%*).

('&,&)'(( (*1(01,+ (*%0.- ,%,)0 0%,./ (*%(** '%'.,

('&,&)'(( (*1)'1,- (+%'*) ,%+0( .%./ (*%(,0 $'%),)

('&,&)'(( (*1)(1,- (*%0)+ ,%,/+ (+%(/+ (*%'+* $'%(,+

('&,&)'(( (*1))1,, (*%/'. ,%-.. .%/.) (*%(+- $'%)'(

('&,&)'(( (*1)*1,, (*%0+, ,%,-. ,%/.+ (*%++) $'%(+(

('&,&)'(( (*1)+1,+ (+%(') ,%++) )'%/*, (*%')( '%)**

('&,&)'(( (*1),1,- (*%//) ,%-(( (/%,*+ (*%'- $'%+.0

('&,&)'(( (*1)-1,- (+%'++ ,%+// 0%(0) (*%*() $'%'0

('&,&)'(( (*1).1,, (*%-0. ,%..+ ()%,++ (*%(/) $'%'0*

('&,&)'(( (*1)/1,, (+%'/0 ,%+-+ 0%('. (*%.(- $'%,*)

('&,&)'(( (*1)01,, (+%'(0 ,%,,, /%0)/ ()%000 $'%**-"

('&,&)'(( (*1*'1,+ (*%/.- ,%-/ /%+-. (*%.)- '%),0

('&,&)'(( (*1*(1,- (*%0/. ,%,,. *-%'-. (*%'/ '%*+)

('&,&)'(( (*1*)1,, (+%'+/ ,%,*( (.%,.0 (*%(0- '%(*

('&,&)'(( (*1**1,, (+%'') ,%,0 ((%/-) (*%+-+ '%(.)

('&,&)'(( (*1*+1,, (+%)'* ,%+(+ ((%*0/" (*%*.. '%+,0"

('&,&)'(( (*1*,1,, (+%*-- ,%)+, ),%/'/ ()%/'. '%-/*

('&,&)'(( (*1*-1,, (*%.. ,%.), ).%/) ()%0.0 $'%))

('&,&)'(( (*1*.1,, (+%*'/ ,%),/ (+%-., (*%(() $'%'')

('&,&)'(( (*1*/1,, (*%0.. ,%,)( )/%*+. ()%-(0 $'%+(.

('&,&)'(( (*1*01,, (*%/+) ,%-*/ *%/. (*%+00 '%(-.

('&,&)'(( (*1+'1,+ (*%..- ,%.)) /%((* (*%,'. '%')*

TS

('&,&)'(( (*1+(1,+ (*%0,/ ,%,(/ )-%+0) (*%(.+ '%(

('&,&)'(( (*1+)1,- (+%''0 ,%,(+ )(%-)) (*%,(* $'%'0)

('&,&)'(( (*1+*1,- (*%0-+ ,%,*( 0%/*+ (*%)*( $'%(.,

('&,&)'(( (*1++1,- (*%/0, ,%,/* (0%./- (*%'-, '%*

('&,&)'(( (*1+,1,- (*%0)- ,%,.( -%)0, (*%0*) $'%(*

('&,&)'(( (*1+-1,- (*%.)( ,%.(+ ),%(.( (*%'*- $'%+)+

('&,&)'(( (*1+.1,- (*%.( ,%.** +%*+) (+%'(* $'%+/,

('&,&)'(( (*1+/1,, (*%.(* ,%.). ,%/(, (*%0/+ $'%(*

('&,&)'(( (*1+01,, (*%//0 ,%,/* (0%0.) (*%*,+ $'%'+-

('&,&)'(( (*1,'1,- (*%+)) -%')0 ('%*(0 (+%*0) $'%',,

('&,&)'(( (*1,(1,- (*%0., ,%,'( +'%**'" (*%,-- (%'(-

('&,&)'(( (*1,)1,- (*%-'( ,%/-+ ()%/'/ (*%0+/ '%')

('&,&)'(( (*1,*1,, (*%-*( ,%/'. /%0'* (*%0, '%'/*

('&,&)'(( (*1,+1,, (+%'+- ,%+-+ ()%'/) (*%/(* $'%)(0

('&,&)'(( (*1,,1,+ (*%0*+ ,%,-+ ((%-/, (*%-0 $'%''0

('&,&)'(( (*1,-1,- (*%-'0 ,%/*. )+%..) (*%-,) $'%',(

('&,&)'(( (*1,.1,, (+%',) ,%+.) (.%*/, (+%)(, '%)'/

('&,&)'(( (*1,/1,, (*%,.+ ,%/-) )(%)(. (*%+/( $'%'+*

('&,&)'(( (*1,01,, (*%.'. ,%.)*" ()%+*/ (+%(., $'%'*)

('&,&)'(( (+1''1,- (*%/,/ ,%-. +%/++ (*%0), '%'+-


! ! MMJ MMJ MMJ

('&,&)'(( (+1''1,- (*%/// ,%-(+" (+%-'," (*%**. '%'))"

@EOP >QK * 5KD

TT

6LPDN ?ZTUHO 2LDT 3KHFM IQS >VP ) $ ?@>1@1 BHSTLQP ($&'





CHSQ ?RDP

<(#' 33(+..,) 33))--&-

3<(#' 33(+..,) 33))--&-

3<#' 33))--&- 189&(.&+*

;<Y#' 33))--&- 33(+..,)

B<3#' 33))--&- 118'*,+-

4DUH%@LOH '&%+%(&'' '*0&,0*( =1??54

1PDNZUH <(#' 3<(#' 3<#' ;<Y#' B<3#'


CHSQ >HI 3ZN &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&&

CHSQ 3DN &$&, &$&- &$&& &$*( #&$')

CHSQ 1WJ &$*) &$'& &$&& '$)+ &$'*

CHSQ 2LDT! '$.& &$'& &$&& '$/& &$+&

CHSQ 4SLIU! ($*& &$(& &$&& #'$.& '$'&

?RDP >HI 3ZN '($*( /$*' '+$&& (&$*+ .$,-

?RDP 3DN '($*. /$)' '+$*+ '/$/- .$+/

?RDP 1WJ '($'+ /$(( '*$(( (&$,& .$-)

?RDP 2LDT! '$,& &$+& ($&& '$(& &$)&

?RDP 4SLIU! #'$,& &$+& #&$'& &$-& #&$*&

7PL CHSQ 1WJ #&$&, &$&- &$&& ($(, #&$*)

7PL ?RDP 1WJ '($*/ /$'* '*$(. (&$(+ .$/)

>VP 1WJ ')$./ +$,' '*$,' ')$)* &$&(

3Q &$'/ &$&. &$&& '$.' #&$'+

3O '($)( /$'. '*$(+ (&$*( .$.)

3QSSHFU 1WJ '*$&) +$-( '+$)- '($,- &$',

TU

@EOP >QK + 3EGHK% ?@>2@2 AENOHLK )%'(




<)$( 4<)$( 4<$( ;<T$( A<4$(

! ! MMJ MMJ MMJ


('&,&)'(( (+1((1') (*%*// ,%.,- )(%++/ (*%-*) $'%,'*

('&,&)'(( (+1()1'( (*%,', ,%--. + (+%,0/ $'%)**

('&,&)'(( (+1(*1'( (*%+)0 ,%.'/ (*%.- (*%-,+ $'%*/

('&,&)'(( (+1(+1'' (*%*/) ,%.-( .%0+- (+%+00 $'%*+/

('&,&)'(( (+1(,1') (*%++ ,%.(* ('%+,( (+%*)0 $'%(*+

('&,&)'(( (+1(-1'( (*%*), ,%.0, ('%+)0 (*%/0) '%.-)

('&,&)'(( (+1(.1'' (*%*'0 ,%//0 +%(-* (,%'-, '%'-*

('&,&)'(( (+1(/1') (*%,,+ ,%-(, (*%/0( (+%'// '%//-

('&,&)'(( (+1(01'( (*%()( ,%0// (+%+,- (+%)(. $'%)00

('&,&)'(( (+1)'1'( ()%,*- -%,+( +%*-, (,%+* '%'',

('&,&)'(( (+1)(1'' (*%)*+ ,%0)- (%(- (-%'. $'%)(,

('&,&)'(( (+1))1') (*%+/) ,%--0 (*%+*. (+%),0 $'%'+(

('&,&)'(( (+1)*1') (*%,,- ,%-+) /%.'- (+%+.) '%'.+

('&,&)'(( (+1)+1'( (*%+*+ ,%.() (-%0.- (*%--( '%,//

('&,&)'(( (+1),1'( (*%+'0 ,%.), 0%,/( (+%()- $'%,/)

('&,&)'(( (+1)-1'' (*%+ ,%.,( ,%'./ (+%)/( $'%(0)

('&,&)'(( (+1).1'' (*%/*/ ,%*0 (/%0/+" (*%.)0 '%/0.

('&,&)'(( (+1)/1'' (*%+/( ,%--) *)%() (*%+*/" $'%,'(

('&,&)'(( (+1)01') (*%)'0 ,%//- +%/+* (+%(/( $'%)'(

('&,&)'(( (+1*'1'' (*%(/) ,%0,* -%'.( (+%0,( '%,,-

('&,&)'(( (+1*(1') (*%''* -%'./ 0%.,, (+%-,/ '%,-,

('&,&)'(( (+1*)1'( (*%'-* -%',(" -%-0. (,%+*," '%'+("

('&,&)'(( (+1**1') (*%+00 ,%-./ (+%),( (+%/+) $'%.(+"

('&,&)'(( (+1*+1') (*%-,0 ,%,*/ 0%0.." (+%(/0 '%)0-"

('&,&)'(( (+1*,1') (*%-,- ,%,(/ (.%+)( (*%+.) $'%)-*

('&,&)'(( (+1*-1') (*%//- ,%*+( (-%)) (*%-'0 '%-+

('&,&)'(( (+1*.1') (*%+.- ,%-,) ),%+(/ (*%+(. $'%-/+

('&,&)'(( (+1*/1'' (*%,./ ,%,0( .%'++ (+%'/0 $'%+*/

('&,&)'(( (+1*01'' (*%,'. ,%-,/ 0%/,- (*%0.. $'%--0

('&,&)'(( (+1+'1'' (*%,+0 ,%-') (*%+*, (+%'+ '%)'-

('&,&)'(( (+1+(1') (*%**, ,%/ ('%.,+ (+%(/- $'%(/)

('&,&)'(( (+1+)1') (*%-'- ,%,-( ()%+- (+%)+( '%)-(

('&,&)'(( (+1+*1'( (*%-.. ,%,(. (0%/0. (*%0** $'%*/0"

('&,&)'(( (+1++1'( (*%*,. ,%./( (*%))* (+%()) $'%.+.

('&,&)'(( (+1+,1'( (*%*- ,%.-/ ('%-'/ (+%*(/ $'%,')

('&,&)'(( (+1+-1') (*%,.) ,%-(+ -%/)) (+%*+ $'%),

('&,&)'(( (+1+.1') (*%-.* ,%+0- )+%/0( (*%.'+ $'%*(0

('&,&)'(( (+1+/1') (*%,./ ,%,// .%'/, (*%.*+ $'%*

('&,&)'(( (+1+01'( (*%+'- ,%.+- /%'-. (+%'+* $'%)(/

('&,&)'(( (+1,'1') (*%-)/ ,%,)- )(%(,/ (*%0(, '%,0-

TV

('&,&)'(( (+1,(1'( (*%+* ,%.*. )'%(0/ (+%(.- (%((

('&,&)'(( (+1,)1'' (*%'+( -%'() )0%.) (+%*+) '%((

('&,&)'(( (+1,*1'( ()%/*- -%)./ +%)(, (,%0+- $'%(*)

('&,&)'(( (+1,+1'' (*%+// ,%--) )%* (+%.0- $'%++*

('&,&)'(( (+1,,1') (*%).- ,%/)+ -%(/0 (+%(* '%)-/

('&,&)'(( (+1,-1') (*%)*/ ,%/// .%+), (+%/(- $'%,,+

('&,&)'(( (+1,.1'( (*%)./ ,%/)) ((%*., (+%+)* '%+/+

('&,&)'(( (+1,/1'( ()%,./ -%+.. /%)// (,%-* '%)/(

('&,&)'(( (+1,01'' (*%',+ -%'() (%*-, (,%,/- $'%))0

('&,&)'(( (,1''1') (*%(+( ,%0-/ +%*(, (,%).+ $'%'-,

('&,&)'(( (,1'(1') (*%*)0 ,%/(. ('%,.. (,%'(, '%(,.

('&,&)'(( (,1')1'( (*%'- ,%00 (*%)(+ (+%)++ '%.0/

('&,&)'(( (,1'*1'( (*%''- -%('* +%(0) (,%... $'%('*

('&,&)'(( (,1'+1'' (*%-/- ,%+-0 (,%*/( (+%+( $'%,(.

('&,&)'(( (,1',1') (*%-/+ ,%+00 )(%*)( (*%.0( '%'+-

('&,&)'(( (,1'-1'( (*%0'. ,%-/- ))%,,, (+%)(, $'%+'/

('&,&)'(( (,1'.1'( (*%.-) ,%-.) (+%)* (+%(', '%0/+

('&,&)'(( (,1'/1'' (*%*,0 -%'/- (,%).. (+%-'+ $'%+(+

('&,&)'(( (,1'01') (*%/-) ,%./, +%/,+ (,%))( $'%(//

('&,&)'(( (,1('1') ((%.*. +%,-/ (/%,(( (+%(/- '%-0


! ! MMJ MMJ MMJ

('&,&)'(( (,1('1') (*%*-/ ,%.,+" ()%'+(" (+%*0)" $'%'(-"

@EOP >QK + 5KD

TW

6LPDN ?ZTUHO 2LDT 3KHFM IQS >VP * $ ?@>1@1 BHSTLQP ($&'





CHSQ ?RDP

<(#' 33(+..,) 33))--&-

3<(#' 33(+..,) 33))--&-

3<#' 33))--&- 189&(.&+*

;<Y#' 33))--&- 33(+..,)

B<3#' 33))--&- 118'*,+-

4DUH%@LOH '&%+%(&'' '+0'*0+, =1??54

1PDNZUH <(#' 3<(#' 3<#' ;<Y#' B<3#'


CHSQ >HI 3ZN &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&& &$&&

CHSQ 3DN &$&, &$&- &$&& &$*( #&$')

CHSQ 1WJ &$*+ &$&/ &$&& '$'. #&$,,

CHSQ 2LDT! '$/& &$'& &$&& '$+& '$'&

CHSQ 4SLIU! &$'& &$&& &$&& #&$)& #'$,&

?RDP >HI 3ZN '($*( /$*' '+$&& (&$*+ .$,-

?RDP 3DN '($*. /$)' '+$*+ '/$/- .$+/

?RDP 1WJ '($(' /$(( ')$&( (&$/) /$,)

?RDP 2LDT! '$)& &$+& *$&& '$/& ($'&

?RDP 4SLIU! &$)& &$&& #($&& &$-& '$.&

7PL CHSQ 1WJ &$*) &$'& &$&& '$)+ &$'*

7PL ?RDP 1WJ '($'+ /$(( '*$(( (&$,& .$-)

>VP 1WJ ')$)- +$-+ '($&* '*$)/ #&$&(

3Q &$** &$&/ &$&& '$(- #&$(,

3O '($'. /$(( ')$,( (&$-, /$'.

3QSSHFU 1WJ ')$,. +$.) ')$(, ')$-- &$()

TX



APPENDIX C. FLOW RATE & MOISTURE TEST DATA

EPA METHOD 1 DATA

EPA METHOD 2 DATA

EPA METHOD 4 DATA

TY

METHOD 1 - SAMPLE AND VELOCITY TRAVERSES FOR CIRCULAR SOURCES

Plant Name Waste Management - Pottstown Landfill Date 10/05/11

Sampling Location Flare Project # 2011-16019

Operator AMD # of Ports Available 2

Stack Type Circular # of Ports Used 2

Stack Size Large Port Inside Diameter 3

Circular Stack or Duct Diameter

Distance to Far Wall of Stack (Lfw) 114.00 in

Distance to Near Wall of Stack (Lnw) 6.00 in

(=Lfw- Lnw) Diameter of Stack (D) 108.00 in

(=3.14(D/2/Cunits)2) Area of Stack (As) 63.62 ft2

Distance from Port to Disturbances

Distance Upstream (B) 444.00 in

(=B/D) Diameters Upstream (BD) 4.11 diameters

Distance Downstream (A) 108.00 in

(=A/D) Diameters Downstream (AD) 1.00 diameters

Number of Traverse Points Required

Diameters to Minimum Number of1

Flow Disturbance Traverse Points

Up Down Particulate Velocity

Stream Stream Points Points

2.00-4.99 0.50-1.24 24 16

5.00-5.99 1.25-1.49 20 16

6.00-6.99 1.50-1.74 16 12

7.00-7.99 1.75-1.99 12 12

>= 8.00 >=2.00 8 or 122 8 or 122

Upstream Spec 24 16

Downstream Spec 24 16

Traverse Pts Required 24 161

Check Minimum Number of Points for the Upstream

and Downstream conditions, then use the largest. Number of Traverse Points Used2

8 for Circular Stacks 12 to 24 inches 2 Ports by 8 Across

12 for Circular Stacks over 24 inches 16 Pts Used 16 Required

Particulate Velocity

Traverse Point Locations

Fraction Distance Distance

Traverse of from Including

Point Stack Inside Nipple

Number Diameter Wall Length

in in

1 0.032 3 4/8 9 4/8

2 0.105 11 3/8 17 3/8

3 0.194 21 27

4 0.323 34 7/8 40 7/8

5 0.677 73 1/8 79 1/8

6 0.806 87 93

7 0.895 96 5/8 102 5/8

8 0.968 104 4/8 110 4/8

9

10

11

12

Location of Traverse Points inCircular Stacks

Traverse (Fraction of Stack Diameter from Inside Wall to Traverse Point)Point Number of Traverse Point s on a Diameter

Number 2 4 6 8 10 12

1 .1 46 .0 67 .0 44 .0 32 .0 26 .02 1

2 .8 54 .2 50 .1 46 .1 05 .0 82 .06 73 .7 50 .2 96 .1 94 .1 46 .11 84 .9 33 .7 04 .3 23 .2 26 .17 75 .8 54 .6 77 .3 42 .25 06 .9 56 .8 06 .6 58 .35 67 .8 95 .7 74 .64 48 .9 68 .8 54 .75 09 .9 18 .82 3

10 .9 74 .88 211 .93312 .979

Flare Method 1 - M1 - Circular Page 1 Printed 11/2/2011V1.15

TZ

RE

FE

RE

NC

EM

4D

AT

AS

UM

MA

RY

Co

mp

an

y:W

aste

Man

agem

ent

-P

ott

stow

nL

andf

ill

Dat

e:10

/5/2

01

1S

ou

rce:

Fla

re#

2P

roje

ct#

:20

11

-16

019

Op

era

tin

gL

evel

:H

IGH

LO

AD

Met

erC

al

Ga

sM

eter

Sil

-Gel

Imp

inge

rG

as

Vo

lum

eW

ater

Mo

isu

reS

tart

En

dM

eter

Vo

lum

eV

alu

eB

PD

elt-

HT

emp

H2

0w

tT

ota

lV

ol

H2

OS

amp

led

Vap

or

Vo

l.C

on

ten

tT

ime

Tim

eS

tart

Fin

ish

(y)

("H

g)

("H

20)

(F)

(Gra

ms)

(ml)

(dsc

f)*

(scf

)*(%

Vo

lum

e)1

10

/5/2

011

10

:15

11:

15

482

.57

45

06

.408

0.9

50

029

.52

2.0

00

75

.05.

839

22

.15

72

.10

98

.7%

21

0/5

/201

11

1:2

51

2:2

550

6.8

75

53

0.9

180

.95

00

29.5

22

.00

08

1.0

5.0

432

2.1

04

2.2

59

9.3

%3

10

/5/2

011

13

:00

14:

00

531

.49

85

55

.532

0.9

50

029

.52

2.0

00

82

.05.

045

22

.05

42

.35

49

.6%

41

0/5

/201

11

4:1

01

5:1

055

6.0

23

58

0.0

710

.95

00

29.5

22

.00

08

1.0

4.3

452

2.1

08

2.3

21

9.5

%5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

*68

De

gre

es

F(2

0D

eg

rees

C)

-2

9.9

2"H

G

Ru

n

#

Fin

Co-

Air

Mo

nit

ori

ng

Div

isio

n,L

LC

UQ

VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE DETERMINATION

Company: Waste Management Load: ~ 1000 cfm to Flare

Source: Pottstown Landfill - Closed Site Run: 1

Test Location: Flare #2 - C05 Start Time: 10/5/2011 10:15

End Time: 10/5/2011 11:15

Conducted By: AMD

TEST DATA

Test Delta P Temp. Test Delta P Temp.

Point (in H2O) (Deg F) Point (in H2O) (Deg F) Duct Area: 9160.9 (A) sq. inches

Barometric Pressure: 29.57 (Pbar) inches Hg

A-1 0.030 1350 B-5 0.030 1345 Static Pressure: -0.02 (PG) inches H2OA-2 0.040 1350 B-6 0.040 1345 Pitot Tube Coefficient: 0.84 (Cp)

A-3 0.060 1350 B-7 0.040 1345 Percent O2: 13.8 % O2

A-4 0.030 1350 B-8 0.030 1345 Percent CO2: 5.8 % CO2

A-5 0.050 1350 Percent Nitrogen: 80.5 % N2

A-6 0.040 1350

A-7 0.020 1350 Percent Moisture: 8.7 %H20

A-8 0.050 1350

B-1 0.040 1345 Average Delta P: 0.04 inches H2O

B-2 0.020 1345 Root Mean Sq. Delta P: 0.04 (Pavg) inches H2O

B-3 0.040 1345 Mean Temperature: 1347.5 (Ts) Degrees F

B-4 0.020 1345

Number Of Traverse Points: 16

CALCULATIONS

DRY MOLE FRACTION OF STACK GAS: Mfd = 1 - (%H2O / 100) Mfd = 0.913

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE: Ps = Pbar + (Pg / 13.6) Ps = 29.57 in. Hg

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS: Md = 0.44 (%CO2) + 0.32 (%O2) + 0.28 (%N2) Md = 29.47 lb/lb-mole

WET MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS: Ms = (Md)(Mfd) + 0.18 (%H2O) Ms = 28.48 lb/lb-mole

AVERAGE STACK GAS VELOCITY: Vs = 85.49(Cp) X {(Pavg)(Ts + 460)/[(Ps)(Ms)]}^0.5 Vs = 19.8 ft/sec

DRY VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE: Qsd = 7.353(60)(Mfd)(Vs)(A)(Ps) / (Ts + 460) Qsd = 19,913 DSCFM (DRY)

WET VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE: Qsw = Qsd / Mfd Qaw = 21,804.5 SCFM (WET)

WET VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE: Qsw = Qsd / Mfd / 60 Qaw = 363.4 KSCFM (WET)


UR





End Time: 10/5/2011 12:25

Conducted By: AMD

TEST DATA





A-3 0.030 1371 B-7 0.030 1372 Percent O2: 13.7 % O2

A-4 0.020 1371 B-8 0.020 1371 Percent CO2: 5.8 % CO2


A-6 0.060 1370


A-8 0.020 1370




B-4 0.030 1371


CALCULATIONS










US





End Time: 10/5/2011 14:00

Conducted By: AMD

TEST DATA





A-3 0.040 1379 B-7 0.030 1380 Percent O2: 14.0 % O2

A-4 0.040 1380 B-8 0.020 1380 Percent CO2: 5.7 % CO2


A-6 0.030 1380


A-8 0.020 1379




B-4 0.050 1379


CALCULATIONS










UT




Test Location: Flare - Low Load Start Time: 10/5/2011 14:10

End Time: 10/5/2011 15:10

Conducted By: AMD

TEST DATA





A-3 0.040 1375 B-7 0.030 1372 Percent O2: 13.7 % O2

A-4 0.030 1375 B-8 0.020 1372 Percent CO2: 5.8 % CO2


A-6 0.030 1374


A-8 0.020 1373




B-4 0.070 1372


CALCULATIONS










UU



APPENDIX D. REFERENCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMPERFORMANCE TEST DATA

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONSPITOT INSPECTIONS

METERBOX CALIBRATIONS & AUDITSNO2-TO-NO CONVERTER EFFICIENCY TESTS

CALIBRATION GAS CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS

UV

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONSInstrumental Methods

Company: Waste Management - Pottstown Landfill Normal Load: HIGH LOADSource: Flare #2 Run: 1

Test Location: Stack Exit Start Time:

RMCEInc Project #: 2011-16019 End Time:

Run Duration (Min.) : 1:00

Volume Of Water Collected (g)

Vlc = (Sil-Gel Total wt. H2O collected) + (Impingers Volume H2O collected)

Vlc = 5.8 + 39.0

Vlc = 44.8 g

Volume Of Water Vapor (SCF)

Vwstd = 0.04707 * Vlc

Vwstd = 0.04707 * 44.8

Vwstd = 39.2730 SCF

Dry Mole Fraction Of Flue Gas

Mfd = 1 - (%H2O/100)

Mfd = 1 - ( 8.7% / 100)

Mfd = 0.913

Volume Of Dry Gas Sampled @ Standard Conditions - 68F and 29.92"Hg (DSCF)

(Pbar + Delta H/13.6) (460 + tstd)Vmstd = Y * Vm * --------------------------- * ---------------

Pstd (460 + tm)

( 29.52 + 2 / 13.6 )) ( 460 + 75 )Vmstd = 0.9500 * 23.834 * ---------------------------- * ------------------

29.92 ( 460 + 68 )

Vmstd = 22.1571 DSCF

Percent Moisture, By Volume, As Measured In Flue Gas (%H20)

%H2O = 100 * Vwstd / (Vwstd + Vmstd )

%H2O = 100 * 2.109 / (2.109 + 22.157 )

%H2O = 8.69

FUEL Factor

Fo = (20.9 - %O2d) / %CO2d

Fo = (20.9 - 13.8) / 5.8

Fo = 1.235

Dry Molecular Weight Of The Flue Gas (lb/lb-mole, Dry)

Md = (%CO2 * 0.44) + ( %O2 * 0.32) + (N2 * 0.28)

Md = (%CO2 * 0.44) + ( %O2 * 0.32) + ((100 - %O2 - %CO2) * 0.28)

Md = (5.8 * 0.44) + (13.8 * 0.32) + ((100 - 13.8 - 5.8) * 0.28)

Md = 29.47 lb/lb-mole, dry

10/5/2011 10:15

10/5/2011 11:15

RMC Environmental, Inc. Page 1 of 2EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS

Instrumental Methods

UW

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONSInstrumental Methods

Company: Waste Management - Pottstown Landfill Normal Load: HIGH LOADSource: Flare #2 Run: 1

Test Location: Stack Exit Start Time:

RMCEInc Project #: 2011-16019 End Time:

Run Duration (Min.) : 1:00

10/5/2011 10:15

10/5/2011 11:15

Wet Molecular Weight Of The Flue Gas (lb/lb-mole, Wet)

Ms = (Mfd * Md) + (0.18 * %H2O)

Ms = (0.913 * 29.47) + (0.18 * 8.7)

Ms = 28.48 lb/lb-mole, wet

Dry Parts Per Million (ppmd) from a wet Measurement (ppmw)

VOC ppmd = VOC ppmw / Mfd CO2%w = CO2%d * Mfd

VOC ppmd = -1.2 / 0.913 CO2%w = 5.769 * 0.913

VOC ppmd = -1.31 CO2%w = 5.27

Emission Rate (VOC ppm as Hexane @3% O2)

VOC ppm as Hexnane @3% O2 = ((VOC ppmd * 3) / 6) * (20.9 - 3) / (20.9% O2 -O2%d )

VOC ppm as Hexnane @3% O2 = 6.205 * (20.9-3) / (20.9 - 13.78 )

VOC ppm as Hexnane @3% O2 = 10.278

Emission Rate (lbs/Hr)

VOC lbs/Hr = 60 * Conv-Factor * VOC ppmd * "Flowrate

VOC lbs/Hr = -1.31420625064239 * 60 * 0.0000001145 * "19913

VOC lbs/Hr = 0.000

RMC Environmental, Inc. Page 2 of 2EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS

Instrumental Methods

UX

S-TYPE PITOT TUBE INSPECTION

Project Number 2011-16019

Pitot Tube Number M2-120-C

Level Y (Y/N) PASS

Obstructions N (Y/N) PASSDamaged N (Y/N) PASS

Type of material SS

-10 < alpha1 < +10 1.0 Degrees PASS-10 < alpha2 < +10 1.0 Degrees PASS

-5 < Beta1 < +5 0.0 Degrees PASS-5 < Beta2 < +5 0.0 Degrees PASS

z or Gamma 0.0 Degreesw or Theta 0.8 Degrees

A 0.800 Inches{z = A Tan (Gamma)} < 0.125 0.004 Inches PASS

{w = A Tan (Theta)} < 0.03125 0.013 Inches PASS

0.1875 < Dt < 0.375 0.325 Inches PASS

1.05 Dt < Pa < 1.5 Dt 0.395 Inches PASS

1.05 Dt < Pb < 1.5 Dt 0.395 Inches PASS

| Pa - Pb | < 0.0625 0.000 Inches PASS

Distance T/C set back > 2.0 2.500 Inches PASS

alpha1 & alpha 2 are the angles of deflection that faces of the pitot tube are off from the perpendicular line of the traverse axis.

Beta1 & Beta2 are the angles of deflection that faces of the pitot tube from the line parallel to the longitudinal tube axis.Gamma is the angle between the line between the two pitot tips and the theoretical level line between the tips.

Theta is the angle between the two center lines of the pitot faces.A is the distance between the two pitot tips.

z is the distance between the two lengths of the pitot tips.w is the distance between the two center lines of each of the pitot tubes.

Dt is the outside diameter of the tubing used.

Pa & Pb is the distance between the pitot tube face and the longitudinal tube axis.

COMMENTS: 10' S-Type Pitot

High Temp TC

I certify that this pitot tube meets or exceeds all specifications, criteria and/ orapplicable design features and is hereby assigned a pitot tube calibration factor of 0.84.

Signature:

Date:

RMC ENvironmental, Inc.

UY

Cyclonic Flow Check

Source Name: Pottstown Landfill Date: 10/4/2011City, State: Pottstown, PA Calc By: AMD

Sampling Location: Landfill Gas Enclosed Flare C05 Project Number: 2011-16019

Check List

Perform Pitot tube Inspection: Yes

Level and Zero Manometer: Yes

Data SummaryPt No. Angle Pt No. % of Dia.

Traverse Points 1 3 13 3

2 3 14 4

3 4 15 2

4 5 16 3

5 5 17

6 4 18

7 2 19

8 2 20

9 5 21

10 5 22

11 4 23

12 4 24

Results

Average Angle: 3.625 Acceptable

CFR 40 Part 60; App A, Method 1 Section 2.4 Limit: 20

RMC Environmental, Inc.Conducted By:_______________

Date:_______________

UZ

PreTest Meterbox Audit

Plant: WM-Pottstown Landfill Test Date: 10/04/11

Location: Flare #2 Auditor: AMD'

Project #: 2011-16019

Meterbox I.D.: 2 Level Manometer: Yes

Gamma: 0.951 Zero Manometer: Yes

Delta H@ 1.851 Barometric Pressure: 29.67

Audit Time Dry Gas Meter

(Min) Reading (Ft3) Temperature (

oF)

Initial Readings = 0.0 472.402 65

Final Readings = 10.0 480.229 68

Run Time (Minutes) Theta = 10

Gas Volume Sampled Vm = 7.8270

Average Tm = 66.5

Audit Gamma LimitsLower Gamma Limit LGL= 0.97 * Y = 0.922Upper Gamma Limit UGL= 1.03 * Y = 0.980

Audit Gamma Yc = 0.9609

Meter Box Audit = Passed

Ideal Sampling Rate = 0.75

Y c = (Theta/ V m ) * [ { (29.92 / (460 + 68) * 0.752

) * (T m + 460) } / P bar ]0.5

Passed = LGL < Y c < UGL

Failed = LGL > Y c or Y c > UGL

Audit Performed By:


VQ

NO2-NO CONVERSION EFFICIENCYRMCEInc-Air Monitoring Division

Manufacture/ Model: TECO 42iHL Instrument Span: 50

Serial Number: 42iHL-42739-267 Date Of Test: 10/4/11

RESULTS

NOx Response: 43.15Peak response recorded during converter efficiency test: 11.32 ppm

NO Response: 0.25 Response recorded at the end of the 30-minute test: 11.18 ppm

NO2 Response: 42.9 Percent decrease from the peak response: 1.2%

Converter Efficiency: 97.06 % CONVERTER EFFICIENCY: 98.76%

SPECIFICATIONS (EPA METHOD 20): RESPONSE AT 30 MINUTES MUST NOT

DECREASE BY MORE THAN 2% OF THE PEAK RESPONSE VALUE.

NO2-NO CONVERTER EFFICIENCY TEST PROCEDURES

RMCEInc-AMD followed the manufacturer's recommended set-up procedures

contained in the analyzer manual. After the initial set-up procedures

were completed, the electronics of the monitor were adjusted according

to the manufacturer's guidelines. The monitor was then calibrated by

flowing NO calibration gases into the instrument. A calibration gas

was then diluted (1:1) with purified compressed air. The gas mixture

was routed through a manifold into a Tedlar bag, which was previously

leak tested and evacuated. This arrangement afforded sufficient volume

to allow the sampling system to operate for the required 30 minutes.

Immediately after the bag was filled, the manifold was connected to the

sampling system. The system was turned on and the analyzer response was

recorded on a data acquisition system. The one minute averages from the

data acquisition system was analyzed for the peak response and the

response at the end of the 30-minute sampling period.

VR

A3(&/2/57&/+, *3(2+(-34 /, 755+(47,53 #/&0 M?<B 9(75376/./&! <(+&+5+. K;3*&I FCCDJM %'/,1 &03 7''7! *(+534%(3' ./'&34I B,7.!&/57. >3&0+4+.+1! 4+3' ,+& (3)%/(3 5+((35&/+, 2+(7,7.!&/57. /,&3(23(3,53'I 90/' 5!./,43( 07' 7 &+&7. 7,7.!&/57. %,53(&7/,&! 7' '&7&34 63.+# #/&0 7 5+,2/43,53 .3$3. +2 CELI 903(3 7(3 ,+ '/1,/2/57,& /-*%(/&/3' #0/50 72235& &03 %'3

+2 &0/' 57./6(7&/+, -/"&%(3I B.. 5+,53,&(7&/+,' 7(3 +, 7 $+.%-3H$+.%-3 67'/' %,.3'' +&03(#/'3 ,+&34I@+ =+& 8'3 90/' A!./,43( 63.+# FEG *'/1I/I3I F >317 <7'57.

VT

AirgasCERTIFICATE OF A...1\lAl~YSIS

Grade of Product: EPAProtocol

Al" •• !.-IIU" C ••••

. :o::S S!"":""~.t"'.t

:. Ij,) L':'.• a" "',' ;!.: :'.'0. ',- ..' ~- .~~....,..-1':":;.-

54.124218661.1

136 Cu F'

1900 PSIG

660

Reference Number"

Cylinde, Volume

Cyllnd~r Pressure'

Valve Outlet.

expiration Oal.: May 11, 2012

E03NI99E 15A2384

cc258863

ASO - Chicago - IL

May 17. 2010

Part Numbe<

Cylond@' NUln~e<

LallO' alory

AnalysIS Oal.'

c.~'<"00 _ ~ __ .'" .E.A I_",,,~,,, ••••_ I•••• ,•• " ••••.• IN •• .., "",,_" •••••••• ~ •.•• " .- .•••__ 0<0"0<'00'••••••. '1<.11.""_ , ••• ,, __ 'as • ,•••••••••<.11..--. ••..•.•.,......•••.•..,.•"'" .•.•.01"'" , •••• .,. •••••••• ""'" •••••••'••••• .,. .'''' ,••••••

all"'. ~"CI" .•••"". IU (;O"C1I"l••• oona.,. Ol". "QlII,j~ 0•••• "" ••••• QtN ••••• nated

00 HOI UM f •.•• C'f"Il"C*' 0I1lCM I~ 0''9'. 1 ~ P.~

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ccrr~O"e!"ltR.,qu •• ted A.tull Pro'CK'ol Tolol'Relallve

Conce"tratJon Concentral1on Mil/lod Uncertainty

~O.2000 PPM 20."5 PPM G' .,. ,'" HIST Tr.ce.b'e

NITRICOX'OE2000 PPM 20J' PP'" Gt .,. ,'WI> HIST Tr.ceable

'. •v

SULFUR OIOXIO£20.00 ••••••

, ~11~ePPM Gt .1_ '" HIST Trlc.l.ble

NITROGEN811anc:-

CALIBRATION STANDARDS

Typ. LoTID Cylinder No ConcentrationeaplraUon Olte

NTRIAINO 60610 CC200042 .9 J8PPN NITRIC OXIOEJOct 02. 2012

NI~wNOX 6Ol510NOa CC200042.9 81PPM NOaINlTROGEN

Oct 02. 2012

NTRMlS02 080601 CC2J7961506PPM SULFUR OIOXIOEJ

Dec 15. 2011

ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT

In, tlUmenllM."elModelAn.lytlc.' Prtnclple

Lint Multipoint C.llbrl.lon

IICH'1

1CAlUode'I600 C"emtumlt'le.cence May 03.2010 I

(CH.1) CAl UQdel600 Ch~'cet'c.I Mly03.2010

IF flR.JirhrtmO

6700 FTIR May ,.e. 2010._-------Noles

VY



APPENDIX E. PROCESS DATA

FLARE OPERATING PARAMETERSFUEL ANALYSIS

WX

PR

OC

ES

SD

AT

A

Com

pa

ny:

Was

teM

anag

emen

tDis

pos

ale

Ser

vice

sof

Pen

nsyl

vani

aD

ate

:10

/5/2

011

Sou

rce:

Pot

tsto

wn

Lan

dfill

-F

lare

No.

2L

ogge

r:R

ache

lC

hleb

orow

icz

Fla

re-

2(C

05

)F

lare

Tem

psC

EM

SE

quip

men

t

Sta

rtF

uel

Fue

lF

low

HH

V-

Dry

HH

V-

Hea

tLH

V-H

eat

Gas

Val

veB

low

erS

etp

tT

C#5

CH

4O

2C

O2

Am

bH

eate

dL

ine

Vig

Tem

pN

OTE

S

Tim

eF

low

@50

%C

H4

valu

eIn

put

Inp

ut

Pos

itio

nA

mp

sD

egF

Deg

F%

%%

Tem

pT

emp

101

5R

un1

948.

08

0643

024

.46

22.

0210

03

3.44

155

515

4542

.52.

430

.56

8.0

300.

02

98.0

103

094

6.0

804

437

24.8

12

2.34

34.

271

555

1547

43.2

2.3

30.5

65.

029

9.0

298

.0

104

594

2.0

801

437

24.7

12

2.24

34.

001

555

1546

43.2

2.3

30.4

67.

030

7.0

301

.0

110

093

2.0

792

440

24.6

22

2.16

34.

631

555

1542

43.5

2.4

30.1

68.

030

1.0

300

.0

111

593

1.0

791

452

25.2

72

2.75

34.

561

555

1549

44.7

2.3

30.1

69.

030

0.0

299

.0

Ave

rage

939.

87

9943

924

.77

22.

303

4.18

155

515

4643

.42.

330

.36

7.4

301.

42

99.2

113

0R

un2

939.

08

3244

825

.26

22.

7410

03

4.39

155

515

4844

.32.

530

.17

1.0

301.

02

98.0

114

594

2.0

835

447

25.2

82

2.76

34.

411

555

1542

44.2

1.1

30.6

70.

030

1.0

300

.0

120

092

2.0

817

445

24.6

32

2.17

34.

621

555

1547

44.0

1.0

30.4

71.

030

4.0

300

.02

7@

57;

>98

121

592

4.0

819

450

24.9

72

2.48

33.

851

555

1551

44.5

1.2

30.3

71.

030

1.0

300

.0

123

092

1.0

816

449

24.8

32

2.35

34.

041

555

1551

44.4

2.6

30.5

72.

030

2.0

299

.0

Ave

rage

929.

68

2444

824

.99

22.

503

4.26

155

515

4844

.31.

730

.47

1.0

301.

82

99.4

130

0R

un3

911.

08

0744

824

.50

22.

0610

03

2.79

155

515

5444

.32.

630

.47

2.0

302.

03

01.0

131

591

8.0

813

456

25.1

42

2.63

34.

411

555

1546

45.1

2.6

29.9

71.

030

1.0

300

.0

133

091

3.0

809

456

25.0

02

2.51

34.

601

555

1542

45.1

2.6

30.6

71.

030

3.0

301

.0

134

591

9.0

814

453

25.0

02

2.50

34.

681

555

1541

44.8

2.6

29.1

73.

030

1.0

300

.0

140

092

1.0

816

450

24.8

92

2.40

34.

231

555

1539

44.5

2.7

30.4

73.

030

4.0

301

.0

Ave

rage

916.

48

1245

324

.91

22.

423

4.14

155

515

4444

.82.

630

.17

2.0

302.

23

00.6

141

5R

un4

922.

08

1744

624

.69

22.

2210

03

4.74

155

515

5444

.12.

231

.27

2.0

306.

03

01.0

143

092

3.0

818

451

25.0

02

2.50

34.

291

555

1543

44.6

2.2

31.4

72.

030

4.0

299

.0

144

591

9.0

814

450

24.8

32

2.35

34.

181

555

1544

44.5

2.0

31.8

72.

030

3.0

298

.0

150

092

1.0

816

452

25.0

02

2.50

34.

601

555

1549

44.7

1.9

32.1

71.

030

1.0

300

.0

151

591

8.0

813

451

24.8

62

2.38

33.

981

555

1542

44.6

1.9

32.1

71.

030

2.0

301

.0

Ave

rage

920.

68

1645

024

.87

22.

393

4.36

155

515

46.4

44.5

2.0

31.7

71.

630

3.2

299

.8

Calc

ula

ted

:

387A

4<>B

A/

;;

0AB

&3?

387A

4<>B

A/

33

6d

ry#

1B891

9=C

($'

''$'

''

387A

4<>B

A/

+*,

#!,

,.%-

#,'"

($'

''$'

''

387A

4<>B

A/

)+%+

,

Cal

cula

ted

Dat

aG

CR

eadi

ng

WY

CORE LABORATORIES201 Deerwood Glen Dr.Deer Park, TX 77536281-478-1300

RMC Environmental Inc

Rachel Chleborowicz

9226 N 2nd Street

Report Number : 57801- 113160Date Reported: 10/20/11Date Received: 10/18/11

Machesney Park, IL 61115

Analytical ReportSample No.

Test

Sample ID Raw LFG Date Sampled 10/5/11

Flame # 2

Result Units Method Date Analyst

113160-001

Ultimate Gas Analysis

Hydrogen <0.01 Mol % ASTM D-1945 10/19/11 KTN

Oxygen 2.06 Mol %

Nitrogen 19.59 Mol %

Carbon Dioxide 31.62 Mol %

Methane 46.73 Mol %

Ethane <0.01 Mol %

Propane <0.01 Mol %

Isobutane <0.01 Mol %

n-Butane <0.01 Mol %

Isopentane <0.01 Mol %

n-Pentane <0.01 Mol %

Hexanes Plus <0.01 Mol %

Total 100.00 Mol %

Molecular Weight 27.6 Kg/Kg-mole ASTM D-3588

Molar Mass Ratio 0.95154

Relative Density 0.95337

Compressibility Factor 0.99767

Gross Heating Value (Dry) 472.0 BTU/CF (Ideal)

Gross Heating Value (Dry) 473.1 BTU/CF (Real)

Net Heating Value (Dry) 425.0 BTU/CF (Ideal)

Net Heating Value (Dry) 426.0 BTU/CF (Real)

Pressure Base 14.696 psia

Carbon Content 34.14 WT % ASTM D-1945

Hydrogen Content 6.84 WT %

Oxygen Content 39.11 WT %

Nitrogen Content 19.91 WT %

Sulfur Content <0.01 WT %

F Factor @ 20C & 29.92in. 9528 dscf/mmBTU

Approved By:______________________________

M. Jean Waits

Page 1 of 1

The analytical results, opinions or interpretations contained in this report are based upon information and material supplied by the client for whose exclusive and confidential use thisreport has been made. The analytical results, opinions or interpretations expressed represent the best judgement of Core Laboratories. Core Laboratories, however, makes no warrant orrepresentation, express or implied, of any type, and expressly disclaims same as to the productivity, proper operation or profitableness of any oil, gas, or other mineral property, well orsand in conjunction with which such report is used or relied upon for any reason whatsoever. This report shall not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without the approval of CoreLaboratories. WZ



APPENDIX F. PROTOCOL AND CORRESPONDENCES

SUBMITTED PROTOCOLACCEPTANCE LETTERS

XQ

COMPLIANCE TEST PROTOCOLVersion 1.0

As Defined By TheCode of Federal Regulations; Title 40 Part 60, 25 Pa. Code Chapter 139 & Pennsylvania State Operating Permit

RMCEINC Project #2011-16019




ONE (1) ENCLOSED FLAREFlare #2 (CO5)

PREPARED FOR:WASTE MANAGEMENT DISPOSAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.


_____________

XR

Pottstown Landfill RMCEINC-CHICAGO REGIONAL OFFICE

Pottstown, Pennsylvania Project #2011-16019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................2





SAFETY NOTICE .............................................................................................................................................................................2


3.1 Test Contractors.........................................................................................................................................................................4



4.0 SOURCE TESTING PROCEDURES ......................................................................................................................................5

4.1 Instrumentation and Equipment Procedures...........................................................................................................................114.1.1 Instrumental (NOx, CO, NMOC and O2/CO2) Procedures .....................................................................................114.1.2 Performance Testing - Volumetric Flow Rates .......................................................................................................124.1.3 Compliance Testing – NMOC...................................................................................................................................12

4.2 Test Methods............................................................................................................................................................................13



4.5 Sample Matrix..........................................................................................................................................................................13



6.1 Report Format..........................................................................................................................................................................16


7.0 CLOSING COMMENTS & CERTIFICATION STATEMENT.........................................................................................20

ATTACHMENT A – EXAMPLE CALIBRATION AND QA/QC ...........................................................................................21

XS




FIGURE 2.1-1 Pottstown Landfill – Flare Diagram..........................................................................................................................3TABLE 3.3-1 Facility Permit Limits ..................................................................................................................................................5TABLE 3.3-2 Air Test Project Schedule.............................................................................................................................................5TABLE 3.3-3 Air Test Project Schedule (Continued) .......................................................................................................................5FIGURE 4.0-1 LFG Flare #2 (CO5 ) - EPA Method 1 Data Sheet ..................................................................................................6FIGURE 4.0-4 Example Data Sheet – EPA Method 5 Analytical Data............................................................................................7FIGURE 4.0-5 Example Data Sheet – EPA Method 2.......................................................................................................................8FIGURE 4.0-6 Example Data Sheet – EPA Method 3.......................................................................................................................9FIGURE 4.0-7 Example Data Sheet – EPA Method 4.....................................................................................................................10TABLE 4.1-1 Reference Method Analyzers .....................................................................................................................................11FIGURE 4.1-2 Reference Method Gas Sampling System Diagram ................................................................................................12FIGURE 5.0-1 Example Meterbox Calibration Form .....................................................................................................................14FIGURE 5.0-2 Example Chain of Custody Form............................................................................................................................15FIGURE 6.1-1 Table of Contents from an Example Test Report ...................................................................................................17FIGURE 6.2-1 Example Calculations ..............................................................................................................................................18FIGURE 6.2-1 Example Calculations (Continued) .........................................................................................................................19

XT

Pottstown Landfill RMCEINCNC-C-CHICAGO REGIONAL OFFICE


Page 2RMCEINC – Chicago Regional Office

1.0 INTRODUCTION


Name & MailingAddress:

FACILITYPottstown Landfill1425 Sell RoadPottstown, Pennsylvania 19464

Contact: Mr. David MoreiraTitle: Senior District Manager

Telephone Number: 603-929-5446Email: [email protected]

Application Number:Permit Number: TVOP-46-00033

Source to be tested: One (1) enclosed flare (Flare #2 - C05)


Test Requested By: Waste Management Disposal Services of Pennsylvania, Inc.Source Contact: Mr. David Moreira

Telephone Number: 603-929-5446

Test Objective: Title 40 CFR Part 60, Compliance and State Operating (Title V) Permit testingTest Methods: 1, 2, 3A, 4, 7E, 10 and 25A

Scheduled Test Dates: October 5thth, 2011

Source TestCoordinators:

Mr. David Moreira Pottstown Landfill

On-Site RMCEINCSupervisor:

Rachel Chleborowicz, QSTI RMC Environmental, Inc. (RMCEINC)




The flare testing is an ongoing compliance test for outlet NOx, CO, and NMOC and will be conducted during thissame mobilization. The flare (Enclosed Flare #2 (CO5) has a maximum design capacity of approximately 2,800standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) of landfill gas. The flare testing will be conducted while the flare is operating atits maximum design capacity or as close to capacity as practicable given the volume of landfill gas available duringthe testing.

An EPA Method 1 data sheets for the flare is included in Figures 4.1-1. These and all measurements provided beforethe test team arrives on site will be verified and included in the final report.

SAFETY NOTICE

The minimum facility personal safety requirements include safety glasses, hearing protection and steel toedleather boots.

XUXU





Stack InformationFlare 2(C05)


XV





3.1 Test Contractors

Name and Address: RMC ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. (RMCEINC) Core Laboratories9226 North 2nd Street, Suite D 201 Deerwood Glen DriveMachesney Park, Illinois 61115 Deer Park, Texas 77536

Contact: Rachel Chleborowicz – Sr. ProjectManager

Jean Waits – Project Manager

Telephone Number: 815-378-6150 Mobile815-425-1102 [email protected]

281-475-1323 Direct281-476-9209 [email protected]



Site Coordinator: Mr. David Moreira Waste Management Disposal Services of Pennsylvania,Inc., Senior District Manager

Test Dates: October 5th, 2011Project Number: 2011-16019

" Senior Project Manager works directly with the site coordinator and the facility’s operators during the testing tocoordinate the testing. They are also responsible for operating and monitoring the instrumental test methodswithin the mobile test laboratory.

" Project Manager manages and supervises the wet test methods conducted at the sample location.

" Team Leader and the Environmental technicians conduct the wet test methods and provide assistance as requiredon the instrumental test methods.

" The Site Coordinator is the facility’s representative for the test program.

The individuals listed within above account for nearly 75 years of accumulative experience in the stack testingindustry. Their experience extends to emission testing projects in nearly every state in the United States, and includesmost source categories to include waste incinerators, hazardous waste incinerators, trash incinerators, medical wasteincinerators, cement kilns, paper mills, steel mills, combined cycle power plants, simple cycle power plants, coal firedpower plants, natural gas compressor stations, diesel engines, ethanol plants, and oil refineries, and landfill gas fueledengines and turbines.


Performance Testing for NOx, CO and NMOC will be conducted according to the procedures of the Code of FederalRegulations; Title 40 Part 60, 25 Pa. Code Chapter 139 , the Department’s Source Testing Manual and the source airpermit. CO, NOx and NMOC emissions will be determined and evaluated in accordance with the applicableemission limitations.

The flare testing will be conducted while the flare is operating at its maximum design capacity or as close to capacityas practicable given the volume of landfill gas available during the testing The applicable emission limits for theflare are presented in Table 3.3-1.

Tables 3.3-2 and 3.3-3 provide a tentative test schedule for all of the testing; however this schedule may bemodified on-site during the test project due to facility issues or process problems.

XW




TABLE 3.3-1 Applicable Permit Limits

PARAMETER PERMITTED LIMITCO 104.1 ppmv; 17.39 lb/hrNOx 14.3 ppmv; 3.93 lb/hr

NMOC 20 ppm dry basis as Hexane @ 3% O2 orreduce NMOC present in the collectedlandfill gas by 98 weight percent

TABLE 3.3-2 Air Test Project Schedule

Source Operating Air Test # of RunDay Condition Methods Runs Duration

Day 1 Travel, arrive on-site, and set-up test equipmentDay 2 Emissions testing on one flare

Maximum Load Instrumental Testing

EPA Method 1-4 (Flow Rates) 3 1 Hour

EPA Method 3A (O2/CO2) 3 1 Hour

EPA Method 7E (NOx) 3 1 Hour

EPA Method 10 (CO) 3 1 Hour

EPA Method 25A/181 (NMOC) 3 1 Hour

Fuel AnalysisLFG Analysis - 3

Collect Facility Data and De-Mobilize from Site1Methane will only be removed if needed to prove compliance.Note: The schedule in above may be altered on-site depending on current test conditions.

TABLE 3.3-3 Air Test Project Schedule (Continued)

Day 1 Travel, Setup and Preliminary testing

Day 2 Performance Testing - Three one hour runs for NOx, NMOC, and CO

4.0 SOURCE TESTING PROCEDURES

The performance/certification test program measures exhaust gas concentrations from the engines for NOx, CO, NMOC andO2/CO2 utilizing EPA Method 3A, 7E, 10 and 25A/18. The equipment and procedures used in meeting these requirements aredescribed below. A completed EPA Method 1 data sheet for the flare is included as FIGURES 4.0-1 – 4.0-3 and examples ofthe computer generated data from our EPA Method 4 spreadsheets are shown in FIGURES 4.0-4- 4.0-7.

Fuel samples will be taken to determine the Btu Value of the fuel and an F-Factor for the facility. Process data will becollected at 15 minute intervals and, at a minimum, will consist of:

A). Calculated LFG flow to the flare in CFMB). Position of the air louvers (Flare Only)C). Oxygen content (% O2) at the flare inlet (if attainable)D). Methane content at the flare inlet (if attainable)

Cyclonic flow within each Stack will be checked as defined by 40CFR60.

XX




FIGURE 4.0-1 LFG Flare #2 (CO5 ) - EPA Method 1 Data Sheet

CONFIRM FLARE SIZING

XY




FIGURE 4.0-4 Example Data Sheet – EPA Method 5 Analytical Data

XZ




FIGURE 4.0-5 Example Data Sheet – EPA Method 2

YQ





YR





YS






Concentration measurements of NOx, CO and O2/CO2 are made according to EPA Methods 3A, 7E, 10 and 25A/18using the analyzers listed in Table 4.1-1. Figure 4.1-1 is a schematic of the wet/dry extractive referencemeasurement sampling system used by RMCEINC. All components of the sampling system that contact the sampleare stainless steel, glass, or Teflon.

TABLE 4.1-1 Reference Method Analyzers


InstrumentSpan

NOx Thermo Environmental Instruments (Model42H)

Chemiluminescence 0 – 50 ppm

CO Thermo Environmental Instruments (Model 48) Gas Filter Correlation 0 – 60 ppm

NMOC VIG Industries Flame Ionization 0 – 50 ppm

CO2 FUJI Electric / ZRH Infra Red 0 – 18 %

O2 Teledyne 3300/Servomex Fuel Cell/Paramagnetic 0 – 21 %

RMCEINC uses a standard manual probe sampling system. The manual sampling probe uses a heated stainless steeltubing and 3-way valve to provide a means of conducting the three-point traverse and calibration checks. The probeassembly will be constructed of Type 316 stainless steel and may be heated electrically to maintain the sampletemperature above the dew point of the stack gases or 250O F. At Pottstown Landfill, the stack temperature is over600 degrees and the probe will not be externally heated due to that excessive heat. A length of heated Teflon tubing,heated to over 250O F, will connect the probe to a moisture removal chiller. The condensed portion of the sample isrouted to the wet / dry extractive system for distribution to the dry NOx, CO, NMOC and O2/CO2 analyzers. Theuncondensed portion is routed to the VOM analyzer.

RMCEINC conducts a leak test of the entire sampling system, including the probe, at the beginning of each test and atany time the test conditions indicate a leak has developed.

RMCEINC manually calibrates each analyzer by injecting the calibration gases directly into each gas analyzer andadjusting the response to match the reference gas value. Upon completing the calibration, RMCEINC conducts a"Calibration Error Check" (three-point check) by injecting the calibration gases directly into each gas analyzer andrecording the responses on the reference data acquisition system for each of the three reference gases (zero, mid-range, and high-range). No adjustments are made to the analyzers after completing the initial calibration step.

RMCEINC conducts zero and upscale calibration checks (System Bias Checks) before and after each test run in orderto quantify measurement system calibration drift and sampling system bias. Upscale is either the mid-range or high-range gas; whichever most closely approximates the flue gas level. During these checks, the calibration gases areintroduced into the sampling system through a 3-way valve assembly at the probe outlet or the Omni-Probe's samplechamber so that the calibration gases are analyzed in the same manner as the flue gas samples.

RMCEINC records the reference analyzer measurements as both 1-minute and run averages on its DAS. Test runresults are determined from the average gas concentrations measured during the run and adjusted calibration driftbased on the zero and upscale sampling system bias check results (Equation 7E-1 presented in CFR, Title 40 Part 60,Method 7E, Section 8).

As an additional data quality measure, the pollutant responses may be compared against a fourth reference protocolgas. This protocol gas will be selected based on the expected concentrations to be measured during the test.

YT




FIGURE 4.1-2 Reference Method Gas Sampling System Diagram

4.1.2 Performance Testing - Volumetric Flow Rates

RMCEINC determines the number and location of the traverse points for volumetric flow rate measurementaccording to the procedures outlined in EPA Method 1. When determining the location and number of sample points,RMCEInc takes into account the number of sample ports, duct configuration, and location of upstream anddownstream flow disturbances.

The flue gas velocity and volumetric flow rate are determined according to the procedures of EPA Method 2. A TypeS Pitot tube with a Type K thermocouple (EPA Method 5 Sample Probe) is used to measure velocity pressure andstack gas temperature at each sample point. Each Pitot tube conformed to the geometric specifications of EPAMethod 2 and was assigned a coefficient of 0.84. An umbilical cord connected the Pitot tube to the meter boxinclined manometer or digital differential pressure meter and digital temperature readout.

RMCEInc determines the flue gas composition and molecular weight using EPA Methods 3A and 4 procedures.Flow Rates are obtained simultaneously with the particulate tests.

4.1.3 Compliance Testing – NMOC

Concentration measurements of O2 and VOM will be made according to EPA Methods 3A and 25A/18 using theanalyzers listed in Table 4-1. Figure 4-1 is a schematic of the wet/dry extractive reference measurement samplingsystem used by RMCEINC. All components of the sampling system that contact the sample will be stainless steel,glass, or Teflon.

It will be assumed that the acceptance of the submitted protocol addresses the use of the alternate methodology.

Before the moisture removal system, a portion of the wet effluent is pulled off to serve the THC analyzer. Thisanalyzer requires the sample to be unconditioned which allows for the full THC concentration in the sample to beanalyzed. In order to obtain NMOC (Non-Methane Organic Carbon) concentrations, an onsite GC will be employed to

YU




continuously monitor the methane concentration in the effluents. The methane concentration will then be subtractedfrom the THC concentration to provide an NMOC result, if needed.

In addition to the EPA Method 18 testing for Methane, gas bombs will be collected for BTU Content and ultimateanalysis. The results will be used to verify the constants in all calculations especially from gas flow to lb/Houroutput.

4.2 Test Methods

Test methods to be used during the test project are described within sections 4.1.1 – 4.1.3 above.


Analytical methods to be used during the test project are described within the sections 4.1.1 – 4.1.3 above.


Section 2.1 above provides a detail description of the testing location. Figure 2.1-2. An EPA Method 1 data sheet forthe facility is included in Figure 4.1-1.

4.5 Sample Matrix

The sample matrix to be used during the test project is described within the sections 4.1.1 – 4.1.3 above.


RMCEINC will follow the calibration and quality assurance procedures of EPA Methods 1, 2, 3A, 4, 7E, 10 and 25A/18throughout the test program. All equipment is calibrated in accordance with the EPA Methods and guidelines by a third party.

The results of sampling system bias and calibration drift tests for each test run are calculated and presented in the test report.Cylinder gases used during the testing are certified by AIRGAS, Inc. to meet or exceed EPA Protocol 1 requirements. A copyof the meter box calibrations, pitot tube inspections, calibration gas certificates of analysis and the analyzer quality assurancechecks are included in the final test report appendices.

The laboratory utilized for this test program is a NELAP Certified Laboratory. An example of a chain of custody to be usedfor this test program is included in Figure 5.0-2.

YV




FIGURE 5.0-1 Example Meterbox Calibration Form

YW




FIGURE 5.0-2 Example Chain of Custody Form

YX





6.1 Report Format

RMCEINC will prepare a final report which will follow the format defined within the “Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection – Source Sampling Manual”, and will be issued within 30 business days of thecompletion of the on-site test program. All field data, calculations, and QA documentation will be included withinthe appendices of the final report. Figure 6.1-1 is an example of the table of contents from a test report.


RMCEINC utilizes computer programming to implement automated data reduction/ validation procedure, thuseliminating the potential of errors that the older, manual method was infamous for. This automated system, developedin 1996 by a third party, has been continually verified each year though use at several hundred test projects.

Figures 6.2-1 and 6.2-2 include several example calculations that will be used during the test project. The final testreport will include a full set of example calculations that will use one of the actual test runs as a demonstration.

Additional examples the equipment calibration and QA/QC forms are included within Attachment A.

YY




FIGURE 6.1-1 Table of Contents from an Example Test Report

YZ





ZQ





ZR




7.0 CLOSING COMMENTS & CERTIFICATION STATEMENT

Questions related the content or format of this document shall be directed to:

Rachel Chleborowicz, QSTISr. Project Manager

RMC Environmental, Inc.9226 North 2nd StreetMachesney Park, IL 61115

815-378-6150 (office)815-425-1102 (fax)[email protected]

To the best of our knowledge, the state and federal regulations, operating permits, or plan approvals applicable to each sourceor control device to be tested have been reviewed and that all testing requirements therein have been incorporated into the testplan.

__________________________ ______________________

RACHEL CHLEBOROWICZ DAVID MOREIRA

RMC Environmental, Inc. Waste Management DisposalProject Manager – QSTI Services of Pennsylvania, Inc.,

Senior District Manager

ZS




ATTACHMENT A – EXAMPLE CALIBRATION AND QA/QC

ZT




ZU




ZV




ZW




ZX




ZY




ZZ

COMPLIANCE TEST PROTOCOLVersion 1.0

As Defined By TheCode of Federal Regulations; Title 40 Part 60, 25 Pa. Code Chapter 139 & Pennsylvania State Operating Permit

RMCEINC Project #2011-16019




ONE (1) ENCLOSED FLAREFlare #2 (CO5)

PREPARED FOR:WASTE MANAGEMENT DISPOSAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.


_____________

RRY



TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................2





SAFETY NOTICE .............................................................................................................................................................................2


3.1 Test Contractors.........................................................................................................................................................................4



4.0 SOURCE TESTING PROCEDURES ......................................................................................................................................5

4.1 Instrumentation and Equipment Procedures...........................................................................................................................114.1.1 Instrumental (NOx, CO, NMOC and O2/CO2) Procedures .....................................................................................114.1.2 Performance Testing - Volumetric Flow Rates .......................................................................................................124.1.3 Compliance Testing – NMOC...................................................................................................................................12

4.2 Test Methods............................................................................................................................................................................13



4.5 Sample Matrix..........................................................................................................................................................................13



6.1 Report Format..........................................................................................................................................................................16


7.0 CLOSING COMMENTS & CERTIFICATION STATEMENT.........................................................................................20

ATTACHMENT A – EXAMPLE CALIBRATION AND QA/QC ...........................................................................................21

RSQ




FIGURE 2.1-1 Pottstown Landfill – Flare Diagram..........................................................................................................................3TABLE 3.3-1 Facility Permit Limits ..................................................................................................................................................5TABLE 3.3-2 Air Test Project Schedule.............................................................................................................................................5TABLE 3.3-3 Air Test Project Schedule (Continued) .......................................................................................................................5FIGURE 4.0-1 LFG Flare #2 (CO5 ) - EPA Method 1 Data Sheet ..................................................................................................6FIGURE 4.0-4 Example Data Sheet – EPA Method 5 Analytical Data............................................................................................7FIGURE 4.0-5 Example Data Sheet – EPA Method 2.......................................................................................................................8FIGURE 4.0-6 Example Data Sheet – EPA Method 3.......................................................................................................................9FIGURE 4.0-7 Example Data Sheet – EPA Method 4.....................................................................................................................10TABLE 4.1-1 Reference Method Analyzers .....................................................................................................................................11FIGURE 4.1-2 Reference Method Gas Sampling System Diagram ................................................................................................12FIGURE 5.0-1 Example Meterbox Calibration Form .....................................................................................................................14FIGURE 5.0-2 Example Chain of Custody Form............................................................................................................................15FIGURE 6.1-1 Table of Contents from an Example Test Report ...................................................................................................17FIGURE 6.2-1 Example Calculations ..............................................................................................................................................18FIGURE 6.2-1 Example Calculations (Continued) .........................................................................................................................19

RSR

Pottstown Landfill RMCEINCNC-C-CHICAGO REGIONAL OFFICE



1.0 INTRODUCTION


Name & MailingAddress:

FACILITYPottstown Landfill1425 Sell RoadPottstown, Pennsylvania 19464

Contact: Mr. David MoreiraTitle: Senior District Manager

Telephone Number: 603-929-5446Email: [email protected]

Application Number:Permit Number: TVOP-46-00033

Source to be tested: One (1) enclosed flare (Flare #2 - C05)


Test Requested By: Waste Management Disposal Services of Pennsylvania, Inc.Source Contact: Mr. David Moreira

Telephone Number: 603-929-5446

Test Objective: Title 40 CFR Part 60, Compliance and State Operating (Title V) Permit testingTest Methods: 1, 2, 3A, 4, 7E, 10 and 25A

Scheduled Test Dates: October 5thth, 2011

Source TestCoordinators:

Mr. David Moreira Pottstown Landfill

On-Site RMCEINCSupervisor:

Rachel Chleborowicz, QSTI RMC Environmental, Inc. (RMCEINC)




The flare testing is an ongoing compliance test for outlet NOx, CO, and NMOC and will be conducted during thissame mobilization. The flare (Enclosed Flare #2 (CO5) has a maximum design capacity of approximately 2,800standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) of landfill gas. The flare testing will be conducted while the flare is operating atits maximum design capacity or as close to capacity as practicable given the volume of landfill gas available duringthe testing.

An EPA Method 1 data sheets for the flare is included in Figures 4.1-1. These and all measurements provided beforethe test team arrives on site will be verified and included in the final report.

SAFETY NOTICE

The minimum facility personal safety requirements include safety glasses, hearing protection and steel toedleather boots.

RSS





Stack InformationFlare 2(C05)


RST





3.1 Test Contractors

Name and Address: RMC ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. (RMCEINC) Core Laboratories9226 North 2nd Street, Suite D 201 Deerwood Glen DriveMachesney Park, Illinois 61115 Deer Park, Texas 77536

Contact: Rachel Chleborowicz – Sr. ProjectManager

Jean Waits – Project Manager

Telephone Number: 815-378-6150 Mobile815-425-1102 [email protected]

281-475-1323 Direct281-476-9209 [email protected]



Site Coordinator: Mr. David Moreira Waste Management Disposal Services of Pennsylvania,Inc., Senior District Manager

Test Dates: October 5th, 2011Project Number: 2011-16019

" Senior Project Manager works directly with the site coordinator and the facility’s operators during the testing tocoordinate the testing. They are also responsible for operating and monitoring the instrumental test methodswithin the mobile test laboratory.

" Project Manager manages and supervises the wet test methods conducted at the sample location.

" Team Leader and the Environmental technicians conduct the wet test methods and provide assistance as requiredon the instrumental test methods.

" The Site Coordinator is the facility’s representative for the test program.

The individuals listed within above account for nearly 75 years of accumulative experience in the stack testingindustry. Their experience extends to emission testing projects in nearly every state in the United States, and includesmost source categories to include waste incinerators, hazardous waste incinerators, trash incinerators, medical wasteincinerators, cement kilns, paper mills, steel mills, combined cycle power plants, simple cycle power plants, coal firedpower plants, natural gas compressor stations, diesel engines, ethanol plants, and oil refineries, and landfill gas fueledengines and turbines.


Performance Testing for NOx, CO and NMOC will be conducted according to the procedures of the Code of FederalRegulations; Title 40 Part 60, 25 Pa. Code Chapter 139 , the Department’s Source Testing Manual and the source airpermit. CO, NOx and NMOC emissions will be determined and evaluated in accordance with the applicableemission limitations.

The flare testing will be conducted while the flare is operating at its maximum design capacity or as close to capacityas practicable given the volume of landfill gas available during the testing The applicable emission limits for theflare are presented in Table 3.3-1.

Tables 3.3-2 and 3.3-3 provide a tentative test schedule for all of the testing; however this schedule may bemodified on-site during the test project due to facility issues or process problems.

RSU




TABLE 3.3-1 Applicable Permit Limits

PARAMETER PERMITTED LIMITCO 104.1 ppmv; 17.39 lb/hrNOx 14.3 ppmv; 3.93 lb/hr

NMOC 20 ppm dry basis as Hexane @ 3% O2 orreduce NMOC present in the collectedlandfill gas by 98 weight percent

TABLE 3.3-2 Air Test Project Schedule

Source Operating Air Test # of RunDay Condition Methods Runs Duration

Day 1 Travel, arrive on-site, and set-up test equipmentDay 2 Emissions testing on one flare

Maximum Load Instrumental Testing

EPA Method 1-4 (Flow Rates) 3 1 Hour

EPA Method 3A (O2/CO2) 3 1 Hour

EPA Method 7E (NOx) 3 1 Hour

EPA Method 10 (CO) 3 1 Hour

EPA Method 25A/181 (NMOC) 3 1 Hour

Fuel AnalysisLFG Analysis - 3

Collect Facility Data and De-Mobilize from Site1Methane will only be removed if needed to prove compliance.Note: The schedule in above may be altered on-site depending on current test conditions.

TABLE 3.3-3 Air Test Project Schedule (Continued)

Day 1 Travel, Setup and Preliminary testing

Day 2 Performance Testing - Three one hour runs for NOx, NMOC, and CO

4.0 SOURCE TESTING PROCEDURES

The performance/certification test program measures exhaust gas concentrations from the engines for NOx, CO, NMOC andO2/CO2 utilizing EPA Method 3A, 7E, 10 and 25A/18. The equipment and procedures used in meeting these requirements aredescribed below. A completed EPA Method 1 data sheet for the flare is included as FIGURES 4.0-1 – 4.0-3 and examples ofthe computer generated data from our EPA Method 4 spreadsheets are shown in FIGURES 4.0-4- 4.0-7.

Fuel samples will be taken to determine the Btu Value of the fuel and an F-Factor for the facility. Process data will becollected at 15 minute intervals and, at a minimum, will consist of:

A). Calculated LFG flow to the flare in CFMB). Position of the air louvers (Flare Only)C). Oxygen content (% O2) at the flare inlet (if attainable)D). Methane content at the flare inlet (if attainable)

Cyclonic flow within each Stack will be checked as defined by 40CFR60.

RSV




FIGURE 4.0-1 LFG Flare #2 (CO5 ) - EPA Method 1 Data Sheet

CONFIRM FLARE SIZING

RSW




FIGURE 4.0-4 Example Data Sheet – EPA Method 5 Analytical Data

RSX





RSY





RSZ





RTQ






Concentration measurements of NOx, CO and O2/CO2 are made according to EPA Methods 3A, 7E, 10 and 25A/18using the analyzers listed in Table 4.1-1. Figure 4.1-1 is a schematic of the wet/dry extractive referencemeasurement sampling system used by RMCEINC. All components of the sampling system that contact the sampleare stainless steel, glass, or Teflon.

TABLE 4.1-1 Reference Method Analyzers


InstrumentSpan

NOx Thermo Environmental Instruments (Model42H)

Chemiluminescence 0 – 50 ppm

CO Thermo Environmental Instruments (Model 48) Gas Filter Correlation 0 – 60 ppm

NMOC VIG Industries Flame Ionization 0 – 50 ppm

CO2 FUJI Electric / ZRH Infra Red 0 – 18 %

O2 Teledyne 3300/Servomex Fuel Cell/Paramagnetic 0 – 21 %

RMCEINC uses a standard manual probe sampling system. The manual sampling probe uses a heated stainless steeltubing and 3-way valve to provide a means of conducting the three-point traverse and calibration checks. The probeassembly will be constructed of Type 316 stainless steel and may be heated electrically to maintain the sampletemperature above the dew point of the stack gases or 250O F. At Pottstown Landfill, the stack temperature is over600 degrees and the probe will not be externally heated due to that excessive heat. A length of heated Teflon tubing,heated to over 250O F, will connect the probe to a moisture removal chiller. The condensed portion of the sample isrouted to the wet / dry extractive system for distribution to the dry NOx, CO, NMOC and O2/CO2 analyzers. Theuncondensed portion is routed to the VOM analyzer.

RMCEINC conducts a leak test of the entire sampling system, including the probe, at the beginning of each test and atany time the test conditions indicate a leak has developed.

RMCEINC manually calibrates each analyzer by injecting the calibration gases directly into each gas analyzer andadjusting the response to match the reference gas value. Upon completing the calibration, RMCEINC conducts a"Calibration Error Check" (three-point check) by injecting the calibration gases directly into each gas analyzer andrecording the responses on the reference data acquisition system for each of the three reference gases (zero, mid-range, and high-range). No adjustments are made to the analyzers after completing the initial calibration step.

RMCEINC conducts zero and upscale calibration checks (System Bias Checks) before and after each test run in orderto quantify measurement system calibration drift and sampling system bias. Upscale is either the mid-range or high-range gas; whichever most closely approximates the flue gas level. During these checks, the calibration gases areintroduced into the sampling system through a 3-way valve assembly at the probe outlet or the Omni-Probe's samplechamber so that the calibration gases are analyzed in the same manner as the flue gas samples.

RMCEINC records the reference analyzer measurements as both 1-minute and run averages on its DAS. Test runresults are determined from the average gas concentrations measured during the run and adjusted calibration driftbased on the zero and upscale sampling system bias check results (Equation 7E-1 presented in CFR, Title 40 Part 60,Method 7E, Section 8).

As an additional data quality measure, the pollutant responses may be compared against a fourth reference protocolgas. This protocol gas will be selected based on the expected concentrations to be measured during the test.

RTR




FIGURE 4.1-2 Reference Method Gas Sampling System Diagram

4.1.2 Performance Testing - Volumetric Flow Rates

RMCEINC determines the number and location of the traverse points for volumetric flow rate measurementaccording to the procedures outlined in EPA Method 1. When determining the location and number of sample points,RMCEInc takes into account the number of sample ports, duct configuration, and location of upstream anddownstream flow disturbances.

The flue gas velocity and volumetric flow rate are determined according to the procedures of EPA Method 2. A TypeS Pitot tube with a Type K thermocouple (EPA Method 5 Sample Probe) is used to measure velocity pressure andstack gas temperature at each sample point. Each Pitot tube conformed to the geometric specifications of EPAMethod 2 and was assigned a coefficient of 0.84. An umbilical cord connected the Pitot tube to the meter boxinclined manometer or digital differential pressure meter and digital temperature readout.

RMCEInc determines the flue gas composition and molecular weight using EPA Methods 3A and 4 procedures.Flow Rates are obtained simultaneously with the particulate tests.

4.1.3 Compliance Testing – NMOC

Concentration measurements of O2 and VOM will be made according to EPA Methods 3A and 25A/18 using theanalyzers listed in Table 4-1. Figure 4-1 is a schematic of the wet/dry extractive reference measurement samplingsystem used by RMCEINC. All components of the sampling system that contact the sample will be stainless steel,glass, or Teflon.

It will be assumed that the acceptance of the submitted protocol addresses the use of the alternate methodology.

Before the moisture removal system, a portion of the wet effluent is pulled off to serve the THC analyzer. Thisanalyzer requires the sample to be unconditioned which allows for the full THC concentration in the sample to beanalyzed. In order to obtain NMOC (Non-Methane Organic Carbon) concentrations, an onsite GC will be employed to

RTS




continuously monitor the methane concentration in the effluents. The methane concentration will then be subtractedfrom the THC concentration to provide an NMOC result, if needed.

In addition to the EPA Method 18 testing for Methane, gas bombs will be collected for BTU Content and ultimateanalysis. The results will be used to verify the constants in all calculations especially from gas flow to lb/Houroutput.

4.2 Test Methods

Test methods to be used during the test project are described within sections 4.1.1 – 4.1.3 above.


Analytical methods to be used during the test project are described within the sections 4.1.1 – 4.1.3 above.


Section 2.1 above provides a detail description of the testing location. Figure 2.1-2. An EPA Method 1 data sheet forthe facility is included in Figure 4.1-1.

4.5 Sample Matrix

The sample matrix to be used during the test project is described within the sections 4.1.1 – 4.1.3 above.


RMCEINC will follow the calibration and quality assurance procedures of EPA Methods 1, 2, 3A, 4, 7E, 10 and 25A/18throughout the test program. All equipment is calibrated in accordance with the EPA Methods and guidelines by a third party.

The results of sampling system bias and calibration drift tests for each test run are calculated and presented in the test report.Cylinder gases used during the testing are certified by AIRGAS, Inc. to meet or exceed EPA Protocol 1 requirements. A copyof the meter box calibrations, pitot tube inspections, calibration gas certificates of analysis and the analyzer quality assurancechecks are included in the final test report appendices.

The laboratory utilized for this test program is a NELAP Certified Laboratory. An example of a chain of custody to be usedfor this test program is included in Figure 5.0-2.

RTT




FIGURE 5.0-1 Example Meterbox Calibration Form

RTU




FIGURE 5.0-2 Example Chain of Custody Form

RTV





6.1 Report Format

RMCEINC will prepare a final report which will follow the format defined within the “Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection – Source Sampling Manual”, and will be issued within 30 business days of thecompletion of the on-site test program. All field data, calculations, and QA documentation will be included withinthe appendices of the final report. Figure 6.1-1 is an example of the table of contents from a test report.


RMCEINC utilizes computer programming to implement automated data reduction/ validation procedure, thuseliminating the potential of errors that the older, manual method was infamous for. This automated system, developedin 1996 by a third party, has been continually verified each year though use at several hundred test projects.

Figures 6.2-1 and 6.2-2 include several example calculations that will be used during the test project. The final testreport will include a full set of example calculations that will use one of the actual test runs as a demonstration.

Additional examples the equipment calibration and QA/QC forms are included within Attachment A.

RTW




FIGURE 6.1-1 Table of Contents from an Example Test Report

RTX





RTY





RTZ




7.0 CLOSING COMMENTS & CERTIFICATION STATEMENT

Questions related the content or format of this document shall be directed to:

Rachel Chleborowicz, QSTISr. Project Manager

RMC Environmental, Inc.9226 North 2nd StreetMachesney Park, IL 61115

815-378-6150 (office)815-425-1102 (fax)[email protected]

To the best of our knowledge, the state and federal regulations, operating permits, or plan approvals applicable to each sourceor control device to be tested have been reviewed and that all testing requirements therein have been incorporated into the testplan.

__________________________ ______________________

RACHEL CHLEBOROWICZ DAVID MOREIRA

RMC Environmental, Inc. Waste Management DisposalProject Manager – QSTI Services of Pennsylvania, Inc.,

Senior District Manager

RUQ




ATTACHMENT A – EXAMPLE CALIBRATION AND QA/QC

RUR




RUS




RUT




RUU




RUV




RUW




RUX

flare compliance testing - waste management€¦ · flare compliance testing october 2011 as...

Documents