five models of staff development sparks, dennis and loucks-horsley, susan(1989). five models of...

33
Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26.

Upload: dale-moody

Post on 02-Jan-2016

278 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Five Models of Staff DevelopmentSparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26.

Page 2: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Five Models of Staff Development Individually-guided staff development Observation/assessment Involvement in a development/improvement

process Training Inquiry

Page 3: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Individually-guided

“I have come to feel that the only learning which significantly influences behavior is self-discovered, self-appropriated learning.”

Rogers, 1969, p. 153

Page 4: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Individually-guided - Defined A process through which teachers plan for

and pursue activities they believe will promote their own learning.

Designed by the teacher Teacher defined goals and activities

Page 5: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Individually-guided - Underlying Assumptions Individuals can judge their own needs and that they

are capable of self direction and self-initiated learning.

Adults learn most efficiently when they initiate and plan their learning rather than spend their time in irrelevant activities of little interest.

Most motivated when they select their own leaning goals based on their personal of their needs.

Page 6: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Individually-guided - Theoretical and Research Underpinnings Adult learning theory

Kidd (1973) and Knowles (1980) Increasingly self-directed Stimulated by real life tasks and problems

Stage Theory Levine (1989)

Different stages of development have different needs

Page 7: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Individually-guided - Theoretical and Research Underpinnings Learning styles researchers

Dunn & Dunn (1978); Gregorc (1979) Individuals differ in the way they process information

and in the manner they learn

Concerns-based Adoption Model (CBAM) Hall & Loucks (1978)

As individuals learn new behaviors and change their practice, they experience different concerns that in turn requires different types of responses from staff developers

Page 8: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Individually-guided - Phases of Activity Identification of need or interest Develop a plan to meet the need or interest The learning activity Assessment of whether the learning meets the

identified need or interest.

Page 9: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Observation/Assessment

“Feedback is the breakfast of champions”

Blanchard & Johnson

The One Minute Manager

Page 10: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Observation/Assessment Many teachers receive little or no feedback

and in some cases they only observed once every three years.

May be a powerful staff development model but is perceived by teachers as evaluation.

In reality other forms such as peer coaching and clinical supervision fall into this category

Page 11: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Observation/Assessment - Underlying Assumptions “Reflection and analysis are central means of

professional growth”. Loucks-Horsley (1987, p. 61) Reflection by an individual on his or her own

practice can be enhanced by another’s observation. Observation and assessment of classroom teachers

can benefit both parties – the observer and the observed

When teachers see positive results from their efforts to change they are more apt to engage in improvement

Page 12: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Observation/Assessment theoretical and research underpinnings Teacher Evaluation

McGreal (1982) Classroom observation plays a key role Concern about reliability Two ways to increase reliability

Narrow the range of what to look for (Madeline Hunter) Use a pre-conference to increase the knowledge of the

observer prior to the observation

Page 13: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Observation/Assessment - Theoretical and Research Underpinnings Clinical Supervision

Glatthorn (1984) Recommends clinical supervisors (or coaches) alternate

unfocused observations with focused observations Unfocused – observer usually takes verbatim notes on all

significant behaviors Data gathered is used to identify strengths and potential

problems that are discussed in a problem-solving feedback conference

Focused – observer gathers data related to identified problem

Page 14: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Observation/Assessment - Theoretical and Research Underpinnings Clinical supervision

Glickman (1986) Suggest that feedback be to provided teachers based

on cognitive levels. “low-abstract” receive direct conferences ( problem

identification and solution comes from the coach) “moderate-abstract” receive collaborative conferences (an

exchange of perceptions about problems and negotiated solutions)

“high-abstract” receive nondirective approach (coach or supervisor helps the teacher clarify problems and choose a course of action)

Page 15: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Observation/Assessment - Phases of Activity Pre-observation conference Observation Analysis of data Post-observation conference In some cases, analysis of the

observation/assessment process

Page 16: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Involvement in a Development/ Improvement Process Teachers are asked to:

Develop or adapt curriculum Design programs Engage in a systematic school improvement

Any or all of these with the focus of improving classroom instruction and/or curriculum.

Successful completion requires the teacher to gain additional knowledge to complete the task.

This model focuses on the combination of learnings that result from the involvement of teacher in the process.

Page 17: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Involvement in a Development/ Improvement

Process - Underlying Assumptions Adults learn more easily when they have a need to

know or a problem to solve (Knowles, 1980). People working closest to the job best understand

what is required to improve their performance. Teachers acquire important knowledge or skills

through their involvement in school improvement or curriculum development processes.

Page 18: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Involvement in a Development/ Improvement Process - Theoretical and Research Underpinnings

Curriculum Development Joyce and Showers (1988)

“It has been well established that curriculum implementation is demanding of staff development – essentially, without strong staff development programs that are appropriately designed a very low level of implementation occurs” (p. 44).

Glickman (1987) Three ways teachers can modify a district’s curriculum guide

Taking lists of objectives and recommended teaching methods and turning them into a set of usable instructional guides

Adapt the guide to students’ special needs Enhance the guide by developing optional enrichment units.

Page 19: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Involvement in a Development/ Improvement Process - Theoretical and Research Underpinnings

Curriculum Development Glatthorn

Activities should be done in groups thus teachers will become more cohesive and will share ideas about teaching and learning in general, as well as, on the development task at hand.

School Improvement Loucks-Horsley and Hergert (1985)

Described seven action steps in a school improvement process that are based in research on implementation of new practices in schools

Cohen (1981) Research on effective schools underpins an approach to school

improvement through staff development

Page 20: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Curriculum Development and School Improvement - Phases of Activity Identification of a problem or need by an individual,

a group of teachers, a school faculty, or a district administrator.

Response is formulated May be formal or informal

Response may be immediate or may require brainstorming sessions

May require consultation with a larger group (i.e., whole faculty)

Specific knowledge or skills may be required Implement or produce the product

Page 21: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Training

… the purpose of providing training in any practice is not simply to generate the external visible teaching “moves” that bring that practice to bear in the instructional setting but to generate the conditions that enable the practice to be selected and used appropriately and integratively …a major, perhaps the major, dimension of teaching skill is cognitive in nature

Showers, Joyce, and Bennett (1987, p. 85-86)

Page 22: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Training Many educators equate training with staff

development Training session is conducted with a clear set

of objectives or learner outcomes that may include Awareness or knowledge Skill development

Page 23: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Training - Underlying Assumptions There are behaviors and techniques that are

worthy of replication by teachers in the classroom

That teachers can change their behaviors and learn to replicate behaviors in the classroom that were not previously in their repertoire

Page 24: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Training - Theoretical and Research Underpinnings Training Model

Joyce and Showers (1988) Depending on the desired outcomes, training might

include: Exploration of theory Demonstration or modeling of a skill Practice of a skill under simulated conditions Feedback about performance Coaching in the workplace

Combination of components is necessary if the outcome is skill development

Page 25: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Training - Theoretical and Research Underpinnings Training Model

Sparks Discussion and peer observation are important as training

activities

Loucks-Horsley et al. (1987); Sparks (1983) Training sessions spaced one or more weeks apart in order to

allow for improved comprehension and so teachers have opportunities for classroom practice and peer coaching are shown to be more effective than “one-shot” sessions

Sparks (1983); Wu (1987) and Wood and Kleine (1987) Point out the value of teachers as trainers of their peers

Page 26: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Training - Phases of activity Involve participants in the planning Allow for interaction in the training session

among peers After training, in-classroom assistance in the

form of peer observation and coaching is critical to the transfer of more complex teaching skills

Page 27: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Inquiry

“the most effective avenue for professional development is cooperative study by teachers themselves into a problem and issues arising from their attempts to make practice consistent with their educational values…[The approach] aims to give greater control over what is to count as valid educational knowledge to teachers.”

(Ingvarson, 1987, p. 15.17)

Page 28: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Inquiry Teacher inquiry may be a solitary activity, be done

in small groups, or be conducted by school faculty. May be formal or informal May occur in the classroom, at a teacher center, or

results from a university class Research is an important activity in which teachers

should be engaged, although they rarely participate in it other than as “subjects.”

Page 29: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Inquiry - Underlying Assumptions Teachers are intelligent, inquiring individuals with

legitimate expertise and important experience. Teachers are inclined to search for data to answer

pressing questions and to reflect on the data to formulate solutions.

Teachers will develop new understanding as they formulate their questions and collect their own data to answer them. (Loucks-Horsley et al., 1987)

Page 30: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Inquiry - Theoretical and Research Underpinnings Inquiry-oriented teachers

Dewey (1933) Need for teachers to take a “reflective action.”

Zeichner (1983) Advocacy for “teachers as action researchers,”

“teacher scholars.” “teacher innovators,” “self-monitoring teachers,” and “teachers as participant observers.”

Page 31: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Inquiry - Theoretical and Research Underpinnings Interactive research

Tikunoff (1983) Interactive research and development promotes inquiry into the

questions they are asking through close work with researchers (who help with methodology) and staff developers (who help with the creation of ways of sharing their results with others).

Lieberman (1986) Teachers server on collaborative teams pursuing answers to schoolwide

rather than classroom problems Watts (1985)

Role of collaborative research, classroom action research, and teacher support groups in encouraging teacher inquiry.

Sparks (1985) Use of action research to help teachers better relate research on teaching

to their unique classrooms.

Page 32: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Inquiry - Theoretical and Research Underpinnings Action Research

Glickman (1986) Advocates action research in the form of quality circles,

problem-solving groups, and school improvement projects as a means to develop teacher thought.

Cross (1987) Proposed classroom research as a means to evaluate their own

teaching

Glatthorn (1987) Action research by teams of teachers as a peer-centered option

for promoting professional growth.

Page 33: Five Models of Staff Development Sparks, Dennis and Loucks-Horsley, Susan(1989). Five Models of Staff Development. Journal of Staff Development. 10 1-26

Inquiry - Phases of Activity Identify a problem Explore ways of collecting data that may

range from existing theoretical and research literature to gathering original classroom or school data

Analyze and interpret these data Changes are made and new data are gathered

to determine the effects of the intervention