first-order earth structure: prem ? ? equatorial section: trønnes (2010) llsvp: large low...
TRANSCRIPT
First-order Earth structure: PREM
? ?
Equatorialsection:
Trønnes (2010)
LLSVP: Large low shear-velocity province: thermochemical pile (?)
- Material, origin, age
Origin and composition of LLSVPs in the lowermost mantle Reidar Trønnes, Natural History Museum, Univ. of Oslo
Dziewonski &Anderson (1981)
Harvard model, Masters and Laske, website
Seismic tomography models Large vS-amplitudes at the top and bottom of the mantle
Two large anti-podal, slow provinces - LLSVP Africa – Pacific (near equator - 180º apart)
S-wave models, lowermost mantle (D”-zone)
The main, degree-2 velocity anomaly was recognized about 35 years ago ! e.g. Dziewonsky et al. (1977, JGR) Dziewonski & Anderson (1984, Am Sci)
Dziewonski et al. (2010, EPSL)
Earth’s rotation axis related to mantle mass distribution and geoid Steinberger and Torsvik (2010, GGG)
Calculated rotation axis fromLLSVP-contributions, only
Actual rotation axis Combined contributions: LLSVPs + shallow slab mass contributions
Comparison of seismic tomography (LLSVPs)and slab-sinking model at 2800 km depth Dziewonski et al. (2010, EPSL)
Lithgow-Bertelloni & Richards(1998, Rev. Geophys.)
Degree 2 Degree 2
Spherical harmonics modelingPower spectra Cumulative power spectra
Slab m
odel
Tomog
r.
mod
elsTomographic models
Slab model
Tentative conclusions 1. The observed degree-2 pattern is only partly reproduced by calculated slab-accumulation 2. The LM-structure may thus be old ( > 300-500 Ma)
Paleogeographic relocation → LIPs cluster near LLSVP-margins
- long-term stability- dense and hot
Large igneous provinces (LIPs) - age span: 16-297 Ma
- irregular distribution
SC
–1%
slow
+2.5% fast
–3%slow
AfricaPacific
Burke & Torsvik, 2004, EPSLTorsvik et al., 2006, GIJBurke et al. 2007, EPSLTorsvik et al. 2008, EPSL
SC
Plume generation along the margins of LLSVPs: evidence from relocated LIPs
Additional kimberlite and LIP dataTorsvik et al. (2010, Nature)
LLSVP-stability may exceed 540 Ma
horizontal flow (and PGZ)
S-wave modelNE part of Pacific LLSVPSamoa quakes, recorded in N-America
S-wave model
Double crossing of thepv-ppv-transition
Large lateral variation
Lay et al.(2006, Science)
Bin 1-3
Mantle flow model
Seismological image ofPlume Generation Zones (PGZ)
The Scd and Scd2 may be
ascribed to double-crossing ofthe post-perovskite boundary
- large thermal gradient in the D”- large dp/dT-slope of phase bound.
D”-discontinuitiesLay and Helmberger (1983, GJRAS): S-wave triplication: S, Scd and ScS (in certain areas, at least)
pv-ppv transition- wide phase loop: pv and ppv coexist through the entire D"-zone and-the Al2O3-component stabilizes pv and widens the phase loop
Catalli et al. (2009, Nature)
With this model:- D”-discontinuities: rheological changes (steadily increasing ppv-fraction with depth)
- High T may facilitate diffusion creep below the lower discontinuity.
- Additionally: the lower discontinuity could also be caused by back-reaction to pv.
Possible rheological explanation for sharp D”-discontinuities (Amman et al. 2010)
Strong alignment and dislocation creepin ppv at a ”critical” phase proportion (40-50% ?)
But probably no ppv inside LLSVPs - hot and rich in basaltic material (?)
Garnero & McNamara(2008, Science)
Locally steep thermochemical pile margins
Requirements:
- moderate density contrast (2-5 %) - pile material: higher bulk modulus than ambient mantle
High thermal conductivity and low thermal expansivity in the
lowermost mantle may help to stabilize the thermochemical piles
Possible LLSVP-material
Basalt-rich - separated from subducted lithosphere - age: 3-0 Ga Perdotitic (or komatiitic) with elevated Fe/Mg-ratio - cumulates, deep-level partial melts - age: mainly Hadean
Density relationsperidotite - basalt
K0 (GPa) Mg-pv 230-260 (perid. is stiffer ?) Ca-pv 236softest: ferroper. 158-152 (FeO-MgO)stiffest: silica 314-325 (stish. - PbO2)
K’: poorly constrained
Basalt: pv, Ca-pv, SiO2, Al-phase
high , possibly higher K0
Peridotite: pv, fp, Ca-pv
low , possibly lower K0
Irifune & Tsuchia, 2007,Treatise on Geophys.
Density contrast: 1-3% - sufficient ?
Deep-level Hadean melting in hot plumes at >300 km depth, followed by downward or upward migration to 410 km depth, crystallization, cooling and sinking to CMB (possible plume initiation by density overturn of cumulate sequences)
Compared to ambient” peridotite:- Similar mineralogy (in D” mainly pv/ppv and fp)
- Higher density (possibly higher than basalt)- Higher bulk modulus
→ LLSVP-requirements may easily be fulfilled
Peridotite (or komatiite) with elevated Fe/Mg-ratios
Origins:Magma ocean cumulates from late-stage, residual melts - crystallization near CMB - crystallization in TZ or UM, followed by density-driven sinking to CMB
Depend on relative slopes of peridotite liquidus and melt isentropes
Dense cumulates from crystallization of lower mantle magma ocean
If melt adiabat intersectsthe curved liquidus here,the magma ocean will strartcrystallizing in the middle
z
Scenario with two magma ocean
Labrosse et al (2007, Nature) Stixrude et al. (2009, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.)
Core
Core
Core
Inner magma ocean: melt density > crystal density (pv, fp) (Fe/Mg)melt > (Fe/Mg)crystals
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Fe-rich cumulatesstarting point for thermochemical piles
Cumulates with lower Fe/Mg
Cumulates with higher Fe/Mg
Sinking of solidified melts from 410 km depth
melts formed in hot plumes at 300–900 km
→ Intermediate age span: Hadean-Archean (between scenarios 1 and 2)
Based on:Zhang & Herzberg (1994, JGR)Tønnes & Frost (2002, EPSL)Ito et al. (2004, PEPI)
Suggested by:Lee et al. (2010, Nature)
Lee et al. (2010, Nature)
Melt accumulation zone
Solidified, thermally equilibrated melt sink to the CMB
Unresolved issue: pseudo-invariant melt compositions at 20-30 GPa - liquidus phase variation can guide - systematic experimentation on a range of model compositions
increasing
MgO
bas.komatiite
possi
bly more
basaltic
-komatiitic
Further experiments with D.J. Frost, BGI-Bayreuth
Geochemistry The relations of ULVZs and LLSVPs with possible long-lived, enriched (fertile) mantle reservoirs
Better data on phase transitions and EoS in basaltic material Na-Al-phase (15-20 %): Ca-ferrite to Ca-titanite structure (??) Silica phase (10-15 %): CaCl2- to PbO2-structure
- p-T-condition of transition, including Clapeyron slope - compositional relations (silica-phases may contain up to 12% Al2O3)
Possible silica analogue compositions : TiO2, ZrO2, CaCl2 and PbO2 (at var. T)
Other important tasks
For all minerals, better data on: - thermal conductivity, incl. radiative conductivity - Fe-spin transitions (in the minerals pv, ppv and fp) - thermal expansivity (and EoS in general) - mechanical propertis, diffusivity, deformation style (viscocity)
Large thermal boundary layer at CMB
Mantle-core mixing is prevented by contrasts in density (5500 - 9900 kg/m3) and viscosity
Large T-increase → viscosity decrease in the D”
From: Steinberger and Calderwood (2006, GJI)
CMB
The plume generation zone: density-driven separation basalt – peridotite Trønnes (2010, Mineral. Petrol.)
Thermochemical piles (LLSVPs)3 possible origins – 3 different age scenarios
Mechanism 1: Segregation and accumulation of basaltic parts of subducted slabs
→ slow growth over most of Earth history
Independant evidence for long-term stability: e.g. several studies by Torsvik et al., Dziewonsky et al. (2010, EPSL)
Terrestrial planets with liquid cores:
”Mantle is the master - core is the slave” (Dave Stevenson, Caltech)
In spite of viscocity decrease in D”:
The rheology of the mantle imposes the convectiveand thermal regime of the core
Pv: HIGH entropyPost-pv: LOW entropy
pv-ppv transition has large, positive dp/dT-slope
Crystal structures
MgSiO3 (Murakami et al. 2004)
Analogue system:CaIrO3
Phase boundary:not well constrainedby DAC-experiments
DFT-model of pv-ppv in CaIrO3Stølen & Trønnes (2007, PEPI)
dp/dT = 19 MPa/K
K: negative (reaction: pv→ppv)
G: positive: negative)
Similar DFT-results for MgSiO3(e.g. Wookey et al. 2005, Nature)
vs2 = G/
v(bulk sound
speed)
vp2 = (KG)
Consistent with theanti-correlated vS and v
Experiments: Boffa-Ballaran et al. 2007, Am Min.
DFT: Stølen & Trønnes 2007, PEPICompressibility ofpv and ppv, CaIrO3
DFT-computation of diffusion rates: pv, fp and ppv
But then:Amman et al. (2010, Nature)
Step 1: Testing of agreement between existing experimental data and computations for pv and fp.
Result: good agreement
So the D"-discontinuities disappear !?
Step 2: Computation of diffusion rates for ppv
Result: strongly anisotropic diffusion in ppv with fast diffusion along a-axis
low diffusion creep viscosity along a-axis
D”:- cold areas: strong seismic anisotropy (high VSH) - low viscosity extensive deformation and LPO is likely deformation-related dislocation creep is likely
Most of the lower mantle - no seismic anisotropy, small grain size and low stress (Solomatov et al. 2002) - high viscosity diffusion creep is likely
Ammann et al. (2010, Nature), Hunt et al. (2009, Nature Geoscience):
For dislocation creep: ppv may be 4 orders of magnitude weaker than pv
Rheology changes dramatically at critical phase fraction of 30-50% ppv
New model for D"-discontinuities
Steinberger and Calderwood (2006, GJI)
CMB
With this model:- D”-discontinuities: rheological changes (steadily increasing ppv-fraction with depth)
- High T may facilitate diffusion creep below the lower discontinuity.
- Additionally: the lower discontinuity could also be caused by back-reaction to pv.
Structure and dynamics of D”- Basalt is denser and stiffer (higher K0) than peridotite (consistent with LLSVPs and PGZs)
- Deformation / LPO of ppv at critical phase fraction may eplain the seismic D"-disc. in low-T areas
Important unresolved issue: Seismic observation of discontinuities inside the hot LLSVPs (thermo-chemical piles, basaltic?)
cannot bed due to the pv-ppv-transition (relative stabilization of pv by the FeAlO3-component precludes this)
Could other phase transitions in basalt-rich material be responsible ? - Possible candidate: CaCl2- to PbO2-structure of SiO2
- Do we know the Clapeyron slope of this transition ?
- Ohta et al. (2008, EPSL) indicate positive dp/dT, but this is not well established
- Positive slope could explain a double-crossing scenario
T
p
PbO2
CaCl2
CMB
core
Earth dynamics –a modified working hypothesis
Schematicequatorial section
??
The plume generation zone:density-driven separation of basalt and peridotite
Modified from Trønnes (2009/10, Mineral. Petrol.)
CaIrO3-based analogues (for MgSiO3)
- space group match: pv: Pbnm, ppv: Cmcm
- phase transition at 1-3 GPa and 1400-1600 ºC
- both phases are quenchable to ambient conditions, enabling single-crystal XRD: single-crystal structure refinement, DAC-compressibility, thermal expansivity
- bulk and shear moduli changes for the pv-ppv-transition correspond to MgSiO3-based comp.
- deformation mechanisms and slip systems may be similar to D” and MgSiO3-based comp. E.g. Walte et al. (2009), Hunt et al. (2009), Amman et al. (2010) But also contradictory indications for slip mechanisms, e.g. Miyagi et al. (2010)
Substitutions in CaIrO3-based systems (possible studies of phase relations, mineral physics and deformation)
Divalent A-site subsitutions for Ca: Sr, Ba - corresponding to Mg-Fe-substitutions
Trivalent A- and B-site substitutions for Ca and Ir: In, Sc, Y - corresponding to end members: Al2O3, FeAlO3, MgAlO2.5