fire emissions (planned and unplanned): activity data ... · fire emissions (planned and...

32
Fire emissions (planned and unplanned): Activity Data & Emission Factors for an integrated, scalable system Anuchit Ratanasuwan (DNP) and Veerachai Tanpipat (USAID LEAF) [email protected] and [email protected]

Upload: truongkhanh

Post on 08-Nov-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Fire emissions (planned and unplanned): Activity Data & Emission Factors for an integrated, scalable system

Anuchit Ratanasuwan (DNP) and Veerachai Tanpipat (USAID LEAF)[email protected] and [email protected]

Contents

• Overview of Thailand Forest Fire

• DNP’s Fire Experiment and Burned Areas Detection Methods and Semi-Auto Detection: SAD

• Fire Fuel Field Data Collection

• Emissions Calculation

• Problems and Challenges

• Conclusions

Causes of Fire From NatureLightning 4 Cases from 174,482 fires(1985- 2013)

Drivers1. Gathering non-timber products 37 %

2. Agriculture debris burning 20 %

3. Hunting 17 %

4. Incendiary fire 5 %

5. Cattle raise 4 %

6. Carelessness 4 %

7. Unidentified causes 13 %

Fire Experiment at Huay Kha Khang Wildlife Sanctuary

The burned areas can be detected by EOS (Landsat 7 ETM+ and MODIS-Terra/Aqua more than 2 months by utilizing NDVI, NBR, temperature, and conventional false color composite.

Landsat 7 ETM+ at the fire experiment site (burned 10 Feb 2002)

31 Jan 2002

4 Mar 2002 5 Apr 2002

16 Feb 2002Burn Scar

Assessment of Burned Forest Area in 1999&2000

Visual Interpretation

Object Recognition Keys

– Patterns

– Colors

– Sites

– Association

Source: Dr. Suwit Ongsomwang, Suranaree University of Technology

Band Combination: 7, 4 and 2

Evergreen Forest Types

Tropical Evergreen Forest

Dry Evergreen Forest

Hill Evergreen Forest Mangrove Forest

Swamp Forest

Pine Forest

Source: Dr. Suwit Ongsomwang, Suranaree University of Technology

Deciduous Forest Types

Mixed Deciduous Forest

Dry Dipterocarp Forest

Bamboo Forest

Source: Dr. Suwit Ongsomwang, Suranaree University of Technology

Burned Areas Model:Model has been developed to identify burned areas using the difference of spectral reflectance values.

Semi-Auto Detection: SAD

Data Preparation: Using LS8 data downloading from USGS Archive to create GRID

LS8 :RGB::7 4 3Date 2014111

Burned Area

Data Preparation: Using LS8 data downloading from USGS Archive to create GRID

LS8: RGB: 7 4 3Date 2013316

Before Dry Season

Data Preparation: Using LS8 data downloading from USGS Archive to create GRID

LS8: RGB: 7 4 3

Date:2014015

Data Preparation: Using LS8 data downloading from USGS Archive to create GRID

LS8: RGB: 7 4 3

Date:2014031

Data Preparation: Using LS8 data downloading from USGS Archive to create GRID

LS8 :RGB::7 4 3

Compare 2 Dates16 days pass.Mid of January& End of JanuaryDate:20140152014031

1

2

3

Data Preparation: Using LS8 data downloading from USGS Archive to create GRID

LS8 :RGB::7 4 3

Compare 2 Dates16 days pass.End of January& Mid of FebruaryDate:20140312014047

1

2

3

4

56

7

Data Preparation: Using LS8 data downloading from USGS Archive to create GRID

LS8 :RGB::7 4 3

Compare 2 Dates1 month later.Mid of February& mid of MarchDate:20140472014079

1

2

3

4

56

7

DN of forested area.

@442952 m.E.,2141846 m.N.

Band1 Band2 Band3 Band4 Band5 Band6 Band7

D2013316 9300 8552 8194 7571 16344 12910 8644

D2013364 9272 8564 8056 7513 14602 12029 8559

D2014015 9545 8802 8285 8042 14378 12584 8976

D2014031 9444 8783 8293 8510 14567 14023 9954

D2014047 9851 9265 9008 9987 16331 17456 12226

D2014079 11795 11057 10159 10503 14615 17809 13785

D2014095 12085 11245 10397 10366 15142 16595 12593

D2014111 12062 11184 10521 10234 16422 16530 11897

D2015002 8997 8420 8028 8194 14457 12754 9026

D2015018 9810 9139 8570 8578 14590 14498 10245

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

DN

DN of Burned area.

Band1 Band2 Band3 Band4 Band5 Band6 Band7

D2013316 9079 8305 8163 7087 18542 11921 7808

D2013364 9072 8379 8017 7351 15462 11865 8432

D2014015 9434 8697 8203 7893 14998 12281 8846

D2014031 9341 8702 8121 8788 14771 14002 9944

D2014047 9789 9217 8757 9735 15444 16957 12142

D2014079 11272 10503 9480 9388 11202 13439 12189

D2014095 11917 11031 9916 9607 12242 14099 12259

D2014111 11735 10843 9904 9507 13098 13955 11592

D2015002 9037 8504 8120 9130 15245 14721 10269

D2015018 9840 9229 8683 9160 14447 16375 11999

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

DN

@443898 m.E.,2139029 m.N.

Burned Area Index (BAI)

Forest Index

Value Color Index

Hue Index

Burned AreasDate 2014111

Burned AreasDate 2014111

Burned areas’ NDVI changes.

Pictures of fire fuel field data collection in Chiang-Rai, DNP

Source: Forest Fire Division, DNP

Amount of Fire fuels in Thailand from Forest Fire Control Division, DNP

Year 2012 Dry Dipterocarp Forest

Month Leaves Twigs Grass Secondary Total (kg/ha)

Jan 2,116 1,155 1,097 1,060 5,428

Feb 2,076 829 628 816 4,064

Mar 2,095 899 591 1,015 4,482

Apr 2,304 1,012 826 940 5,136

May 2,593 958 770 727 5,050

Jun 2,690 1,252 1,111 911 5,964

Jul 1,978 1,089 1,195 867 5,130

Aug 2,280 1,302 1,231 962 5,775

Sep 1,392 696 352 720 3,159

Oct 2,248 833 1,072 1,168 5,321

Nov 1,306 840 965 911 4,093

Dec 1,346 809 876 827 3,851

Source: Forest Fire Division, DNP

Forest fire emissions calculation

Source: 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National GHG Inventories, V.4 AFOLU, pp. 2.42-2.43

Problems

1.No agreed SOP for detecting forest burned areas or degradation by RS.

2.Lack of field data in many categories.3.Lack of knowledge and understanding of what

is degradation and how much degradation occurs?

4.Lack of fuel consumption and fire behavior knowledge and understanding.

Challenges 1.How to create a systematic national forest

burned areas and degradation detection and inventory system in place?

2.How to initial more forest fire studies and researches on the ground and keep those running?

3.How to educate the importance of degradation to forest cover change and understanding its characteristics?

4.How to validate the emissions results found?

In conclusionHao et al (2014) stated that “The spatial and temporal extent of fires and the sizes of burned areas are critical parameters in the estimation of fire emissions.” Larkin et al (2014) stated “. . . every components used to calculate Wildland fire emissions is uncertain . . . .” Ottmar (2014) stated “. . . estimates of greenhouse gas emissions will not improve unless we find ways to better connect fuels and consumption to remote sensing data.”

Unfortunately, we (Thailand) are lacking of both knowledge and understanding of the above issues.

Source: Hao, W. M., Larkin, N. K., 2014. Wild fire emissions, carbon, and climate: Wildland fire detection and burned areas in the United States. 317, 20-25. Larkin, N. K., Raffuse S. M., Strand, T. M., 2014. Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: U.S. emissions inventries. Ottmar, R. D., 2014. Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: Modelling fuel consumption. For. Ecol. Manage. 317, 41-50.

Fire emissions (planned and unplanned): Activity Data & Emission Factors for an integrated, scalable system

Anuchit Ratanasuwan (DNP) and Veerachai Tanpipat (USAID LEAF)[email protected] and [email protected]

Thank you very much!