finding limits algebraically in section 12-1, we used calculators and graphs to guess the values of...
DESCRIPTION
We use the following properties of limits, called the Limit Laws, to calculate limits. Suppose that c is a constant and that the following limits exist:TRANSCRIPT
Finding Limits Algebraically
In Section 12-1, we used calculators and graphs to guess the values of limits.
• However, we saw that such methods don’t always lead to the correct answer.
In this section, we use algebraic methods to find limits exactly.
Limit Laws
Limit Laws
We use the following properties of limits, called the Limit Laws, to calculate limits.
• Suppose that c is a constant and that the following limits exist:
lim ( ) and lim ( )x a x a
f x g x
Limit Laws 1, 2, and 3
Then,
1 Limit of a Sum
2Limit of
a Difference
3Limit of
a Constant Multiple
lim ( ) ( )
lim ( ) lim ( )x a
x a x a
f x g x
f x g x
lim ( ) ( )
lim ( ) lim ( )x a
x a x a
f x g x
f x g x
lim ( ) lim ( )x a x a
cf x c f x
Limit Laws 4 and 5
4Limit of
a Product
5Limit of
a Quotient
lim ( ) ( )
lim ( ) lim ( )x a
x a x a
f x g x
f x g x
lim ( )( )lim( ) lim ( )
if lim ( ) 0
x a
x ax a
x a
f xf xg x g x
g x
Limit Laws
These five laws can be stated verbally as follows:
1. The limit of a sum is the sum of the limits.
2. The limit of a difference is the difference of the limits.
Limit Laws
3. The limit of a constant times a function is the constant times the limit of the function.
4. The limit of a product is the product of the limits.
5. The limit of a quotient is the quotient of the limits (provided that the limit of the denominator is not 0).
Limit Laws
It’s easy to believe that these properties are true.
• For instance, if f(x) is close to L and g(x) is close to M, it is reasonable to conclude that f(x) + g(x) is close to L + M.
• This gives us an intuitive basis for believing that Law 1 is true.
Limit Laws
If we use Law 4 (Limit of a Product) repeatedly with g(x) = f(x) , we obtain the following Law 6 for the limit of a power.
A similar law holds for roots.
Limit Laws 6 and 7
6where n is a positive integer
Limit of a Power
7where n is a positive integer
Limit of a Root
lim ( ) lim ( )nn
x a x af x f x
lim ( ) lim ( )n n
x a x af x f x
• If n is even, we assume that .
lim 0x a
f x
Limit Laws
In words, these laws say:
6. The limit of a power is the power of the limit.
7. The limit of a root is the root of the limit.
E.g. 1—Using the Limit Laws
Use the Limit Laws and the graphs of f and g in to evaluate these limits, if they exist.
2
1
2
3
1
(a) lim ( ) 5 ( )
(b) lim ( ) ( )
( )(c) lim( )
(d) lim ( )
x
x
x
x
f x g x
f x g x
f xg x
f x
E.g. 1—Using the Limit Laws Example (a)
We see that:
• Therefore,
2 2lim ( ) 1 and lim ( ) 1x x
f x g x
2
2 2
2 2
lim ( ) 5 ( )
lim ( ) lim 5 ( )
lim ( ) 5 lim ( )
1 5( 1) 4
x
x x
x x
f x g x
f x g x
f x g x
E.g. 1—Using the Limit Laws Example (b)
We see that .
However, does not exist because the left- and right-hand limits are different:
1lim ( ) 2x
f x
1lim ( )x
g x
1
1
lim ( ) 2
lim ( ) 1
x
x
g x
g x
E.g. 1—Using the Limit Laws Example (b)
So, we can’t use Law 4. • The given limit does not exist—since
the left-hand limit is not equal to the right-hand limit.
E.g. 1—Using the Limit Laws Example (c)
The graphs show that:
• As the limit of the denominator is 0, we can’t use Law 5.
• The given limit does not exist—as the denominator approaches 0 while the numerator approaches a nonzero number.
2
2
lim ( ) 1.4
andlim ( ) 0
x
x
f x
g x
E.g. 1—Using the Limit Laws Example (d)
Since , we use Law 6 to get:
1lim ( ) 2x
f x
3
1
3
1
3
lim ( )
lim ( )
2 8
x
x
f x
f x
Applying the Limit Laws
Some Special Units
In applying the Limit Laws, we need to use four special limits.
1
2
3
4
lim
lim
lim ( is a positive integer)
lim ( is a positive integer and 0)
x a
x a
n n
x a
n n
x a
c c
x a
x a n
x a n a
Some Special Units
Special Limits 1 and 2 are intuitively obvious.
• Looking at the graphs of y = c and y = x will convince you of their validity.
Special Limits 3 and 4 are special cases of Limit Laws 6 and 7.
E.g. 2—Using the Limit Laws
Evaluate the following limits and justify each step.
2
5
3 2
2
(a) lim(2 3 4)
2 1(b) lim5 3
x
x
x x
x xx
E.g. 2—Using the Limit Laws Example (a)
2
5
2
5 5 5
2
5 5 5
2
(Difference & Sum)
(Constant Multiple)
(SpecialLimits 3,2,&1)
lim(2 3 4)
lim(2 ) lim(3 ) lim 4
2lim 3lim lim 4
2(5 ) 3(5)
3
4
9
x
x x x
x x x
x x
x x
x x
E.g. 2—Using the Limit Laws
We start by using Law 5.
However, its use is fully justified only at the final stage—when we see that:
• The limits of the numerator and denominator exist.
• The limit of the denominator is not 0.
Example (b)
E.g. 2—Using the Limit Laws
3 2
2
3 2
2
2
3 2
2 2 2
2 2
(Sums,Differences,
& Constant Multiples)
2 1lim5 3
lim ( 2 1)
lim (5 3 )
lim 2 lim lim 1
lim 5 3 lim
x
x
x
x x x
x x
x xx
x x
x
x x
x
Example (b)
E.g. 2—Using the Limit Laws
3 2
(Special Limits 3, 2, & 1)( 2) 2( 2) 1
5 3( 2)
111
Example (b)
Direct Substitution
If we let f(x) = 2x2 – 3x + 4, then f(5) = 39.
• In Example 2 (a), we found that .
• That is, we would have gotten the correct answer by substituting 5 for x.
• Similarly, direct substitution provides the correct answer in part (b).
5lim ( ) 39x
f x
Direct Substitution
• The functions in Example 2 are a polynomial and a rational function, respectively.
• Similar use of the Limit Laws proves that direct substitution always works for such functions.
• We state this fact as follows.
Limits by Direct Substitution
If f is a polynomial or a rational function and a is in the domain of f, then
lim ( ) ( )x a
f x f a
Continuous Functions
Functions with this direct substitution property are called continuous at a.
E.g. 3—Finding Limits by Direct Substitution
Evaluate the following limits.
3
3
2
41
(a) lim(2 10 8)
5(b) lim2
x
x
x x
x xx
E.g. 3—Direct Substitution
The function f(x) = 2x3 – 10x – 8 is a polynomial.
• So, we can find the limit by direct substitution:
3
3lim(2 10 8) 2(3) 10(3) 8
16x
x x
Example (a)
E.g. 3—Direct Substitution
The function f(x) = (x2 + 5x)/(x4 + 2) is a rational function.
Also, x = –1 is in its domain (because the denominator is not zero for x = –1. )
• So, we can find the limit by direct substitution:2 2
4 41
5 ( 1) 5( 1) 4lim2 ( 1) 2 3x
x xx
Example (b)
Finding Limits Using Algebra and the Limit Laws
Finding Limits Using Algebra and the Limit Laws
As we saw in Example 3, evaluating limits by direct substitution is easy.
However, not all limits can be evaluated this way.
• Most situations in which limits are useful require us to work harder to evaluate the limit.
• The next three examples illustrate how we can use algebra to find limits.
E.g. 4—Finding a Limit by Canceling a Common Factor
Find
• Let f(x) = (x – 1)/(x2 – 1). • We can’t find the limit by substituting x = 1
because f(1)isn’t defined. • Nor can we apply Law 5 since the limit of
the denominator is 0. • Instead, we need to do some preliminary algebra.
21
1lim1x
xx
E.g. 4—Finding a Limit by Canceling a Common Factor
We factor the denominator as a difference of squares:
• The numerator and denominator have a common factor of x – 1.
• When we take the limit as x approaches 1, we have x ≠ 1, and so x – 1 ≠ 0.
2
1 11 ( 1)( 1)
x xx x x
E.g. 4—Finding a Limit by Canceling a Common Factor
So, we can cancel the common factor and compute the limit as follows:
• This calculation confirms algebraically the answer we got numerically and graphically in Example 1 in Section 12-1.
21 1
1
1 1lim lim1 ( 1)( 1)
1 1 1lim1 1 1 2
x x
x
x xx x x
x
E.g. 5—Finding a Limit by Simplifying
Evaluate
• We can’t use direct substitution to evaluate this limit—as the limit of the denominator is 0.
• So, we first simplify the limit algebraically.
2
0
(3 ) 9limh
hh
E.g. 5—Finding a Limit by Simplifying
2 2
0 0
2
0
0
(3 ) 9 (9 6 ) 9lim lim
6lim
lim(6 )
6
h h
h
h
h h hh h
h hhh
E.g. 6—Finding a Limit by Rationalizing
Find
• We can’t apply Law 5 immediately—as the limit of the denominator is 0.
• Here, the preliminary algebra consists of rationalizing the numerator.
2
20
9 3limt
tt
E.g. 6—Finding a Limit by Rationalizing
2
20
2 2
2 20
2
2 20
2
2 20
9 3lim
9 3 9 3lim9 3
( 9) 9lim( 9 3)
lim( 9 3)
t
t
t
t
tt
t tt t
tt t
tt t
E.g. 6—Finding a Limit by Rationalizing
• This calculation confirms the guess we made in Example 2 in Section 12-1.
20
2
0
1lim9 3
1
lim( 9) 3
1 13 3 6
t
t
t
t
Using Left- and Right-Hand Limits
Using Left- and Right-Hand Limits
Some limits are best calculated by first finding the left- and right-hand limits.
• The following theorem is a reminder of what we discovered in Section 12-1.
• It says that a two-sided limit exists if and only if both of the one-sided limits exist and are equal.
Using Left- and Right-Hand Limits
• When computing one-sided limits, we use the fact that the Limit Laws also hold for one-sided limits.
lim ( )
if and only iflim ( ) lim ( )
x a
x a x a
f x L
f x L f x
E.g. 7—Comparing Right and Left Limits
Show that .
• Recall that:
0lim | | 0x
x
if 0if 0
x xx
x x
E.g. 7—Comparing Right and Left Limits
Since | x | = x for x > 0, we have:
For x < 0, we have | x | = –x, and so
• Therefore,
0 0lim lim 0x x
x x
0 0lim lim ( ) 0x x
x x
0lim 0x
x
E.g. 7—Comparing Right and Left Limits
The result of Example 7 looks plausible from this figure.
E.g. 8—Comparing Right and Left Limits
Prove that does not exist.
• Since | x | = x for x > 0 and | x | = –x for x < 0, we have:
• Since the right-hand and left-hand limits exist and are different, it follows that the limit does not exist.
0limx
xx
0 0 0
0 0 0
lim lim lim 1 1
lim lim lim ( 1) 1
x x x
x x x
x xx xx xx x
E.g. 8—Comparing Right and Left Limits
The graph of the function is shown here and supports the limits we found.
E.g. 9—Limit of a Piecewise-Defined Function
Let
Determine whether exists.
4 if 4( )8 2 if 4
x xf xx x
4lim ( )x
f x
E.g. 9—Limit of a Piecewise-Defined Function
Since for x > 4, we have:
Since f(x) = 8 – 2x for x < 4, we have:
• The right- and left-hand limits are equal.• Thus, the limit exists and .
( ) 4f x x
4 4lim ( ) lim 4 4 4 0x x
f x x
4 4lim ( ) lim (8 2 ) 8 2 4 0x x
f x x
4lim ( ) 0x
f x
E.g. 9—Limit of a Piecewise-Defined Function
The graph of f is shown.