financing for climate and biodiversity in a development cooperation context – policy and...
TRANSCRIPT
Financing for climate and biodiversity in a
development cooperation context – policy
and experiences from a Sida perspective
4 November, 2010
Maria Berlekom
Acting Director
Department for Environment, Climate Change and Sustainable Service
Sida
Structure
Relevance for development cooperation
Swedish policy framework on environment and
climate change in development cooperation
Global needs and commitments
Instruments and work at Sida
Challenges
Why does it matter?
Ecosystem services: essential for life, livelihoods
and growth
Climate change + loss of biodiversity/ecosystem
services undermine development opportunities
The poorest are most vulnerable and hardest hit
Adaptation and development projects
Swedish Policy framework on
Environment and Climate Change in
Development Cooperation
One of six global challenges in the Policy for Global
Development
One of three thematic priorities for development cooperation
Clear reference in most of new Swedish development
cooperation policies
Specific policy on Environment and Climate Change in
development cooperation
Policy on Environment and Climate Change in
Development Cooperation
Clear cross-cutting mandate
Climate change and ecosystem services/biodiversity
Five areas in focus: strengthening institutional capacity; natural
resources (agriculture, forests, marine resources; water
resources and water & sanitation; energy; urban development
Needs, sources and
commitments – a thorny issue
Climate change (UNCCC): Fast-start (upto 2012);
100 billion USD/year by 2020
Biodiversity (UNCBD): strategy for resource
mobilisation
Sources: public sector, private sector etc. ODA
minor part, important catalytical role.
Instruments and work at Sida
Strategy-driven: Loans and guarantees;
research; bilateral; regional; global; international
training programmes etc
Special initiatives: Climate change initiative +
environmental loans and guarantees
Primarily build on existing programmes
Safe-guards
Challenges
Focus on results vs focus on in-puts
The risk of fragmentation: initiatives, funds,
reporting requirements etc
Who sets priorities?
Country systems vs dedicated projects
What is ”new and additional”