financial incentives to promote citizen investment in renewables
TRANSCRIPT
FinancialIncentivestoPromoteCitizenInvestmentin
RenewablesJosephCurtin,UCC
Thursday8th December
Fundedby:
1. (Very)shorthistoryofIrishrenewableenergydevelopment
2. Thecasefor(andagainst)citizeninvestment3. Theuseoffinancialincentivesand“typicalmodels”infourjurisdictions:Germany;theUK;Denmark&Ontario
4. Futurework5. Conclusionsandpolicyimplications
Overview
Twoviewsonpromotingcitizeninvestment1.WillunlockthenextphaseofIrishdecarbonisationbybuildingsocial“buy-in”
• Generates localincomeandregionaldevelopment• Morelocallyappropriatedevelopments,morelikelytoreceiveplanning• Contributetounderstandingofclimateissues• Disposecitizenstomakingfuturelow-carboninvestments
2.It’snotpossibleintheIrishcontext
• Increasescosts ofdevelopingprojects• Burdenonprojectdevelopers(slowsdownprojects,fiduciaryandregulatorresponsibility)• Irishcitizensaretooriskaverse• Windprojectsinpipelineto2020havegridconnections/approvals
Proportion of total electricitygeneration (%, 2014)
Local Ownership
Renewables
Wind Solar PV
Germany 25.8 9 5.0 Over half of total investment in wind andsolar has come from citizen investors
Denmark 53 40.5 .2 Over half of total wind investment fromlocal citizen investors
UK 19.1 9.5 .6 Low levels of community and citizenownership, though increasingly since2000 and especially since 2009
Ontario 28.7 4.4 Less than.1
Low levels of community and citizenownership, though increasingly rapidlysince 2009
FourCaseStudies
**OntarioHow?financialincentivesHow?FocusedonModelsofParticipation
Timeline
1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
FiT forwind&incomeeligiblefortaxrebate(1992)
Veryhighenergyandcarbontaxes
FIP(2003)
Grants:30%ofwindturbine(1979)
Mandatedequityoffertolocalcitizens(2009)
Guaranteeschemeforloansforfeasibilitystudies (upto€70,000) (2009)
DevelopmentFeasibility OperationConstruction
IncreasedFIP(2009)
DevelopmentFeasibility OperationConstruction
Timeline
1990s
2000s
2010s
UndifferentiatedFiT&significanttaxadvantagesfromresultantincome
Pilotsoftloans&grantsprogrammeforSolarPV
Expandedsoftloans(2%)programme forPV
Technologyandsize-specificFIT
Tenderschemeforlargeprojects
Allsoftloanprogrammesconsolidated:upto100%ofInvestmentcosts
State/Regional-levelprogrammes
Localorganizations&citizenassociationsencouragingenergycommunities
Timeline
1990s
2000s
2010s FiT forsmallerprojectsunder5/10MW
ContractforDifference
NonFossilFuelObligation
Grantforfeasibilitystudies (upto€26,000)
RenewablesObligationGrantsupport(CRI)
Grantsupport:lowcarboncommunitychallenge
Grantforpre-planningdevelopmentwork(upto€26,000)
30-50%taxrelieftoinvestorsinnewcompanies,earlystagestartupsandsocialenterprises(ended2015)
Voluntaryequityoffer
DevelopmentFeasibility OperationConstruction
OntarioTimeline
2000s
2010s FiT:Technologyandsizedifferentiated+ADDER
EnergyPartnershipProgram:grantfundingandfinancetocoverplanningapplicationsandotherstudies(coveringlegal,technical,financialandduediligenceandsoftcosts)
TaxexemptionforAboriginalcommunities
DevelopmentFeasibility OperationConstruction
EnergyPartnershipProgram:Grantfundingandaccesstofinancetocoverfeasibilityassessments
2011:25/25MWsetaside
2014:competitivetenderingprocesswithlocalownershipasimportantcriteria
**
TypicalmodelsSmallerProjects(oftensolar) LargerProjects(oftenwind)Co-ops for solar PV and some smallerwind
Limitedpartnerships(GmbHandCo.KGstructure)formanywind*
Denmark For-profit guild structure with co-op-like decision-making for majority of fully community-owned and shared ownership (wind) projects
TheUK No typical model evident: Communitybenefit societies, charities, co-ops all used
No typical model evident: a variety of co-ownership models emerging
Ontario For profit energy co-ops for solar PV (onewind)
JVbetweenaboriginalcommunitygroupsandprofessionaldevelopers(wind)
Impactoffinancialincentiveontypicalmodelisevident.e.g:• Germanytaxtreatmentofprofit• OntarioFiT legislation
*Notnecessarily“local”investors
Conclusions:Specific• Incentivesrequiredatallstagesofprojectdevelopmenttoovercomediscretebarriersforcitizenandcommunities• Grantsandaccessto(soft)financeatFeasibilityandDevelopment(+accesstotrustedintermediary)• Operationstage:WhileFITshavebeencorrelatedtohighlevelsofcommunityinvestmentinmanycases,notinstrumentchoicebutdesignedcharacteristicswhicharemostimportant• Tender/quota-basedschemescanbedesignedwithcommunitiesinmind(Ontario,Quebec,notUK)• Taxefficienttreatmentofprofitsisanimportantconsideration
Conclusions:General• Promotingcitizen/communityinvolvementinrenewableprojectsispossibleinIreland• Butverychallengingastheseinvestorsaredifferent:requireslong-termandpersistentpolicyfocus• Usefultopromotetypicalmodels/vehiclesthroughdesignoffinancialincentives• Cost:wecan’taffordtodothisV wecan’taffordnottodothis?• Speedofdeployment:faster orslowerdecarbonisation?• Alienatedcitizenry,populism:getruralandmarginalcommunities“invested”