final plenary session professional development consortium in mfl

16
Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Upload: doris-bennett

Post on 19-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Final Plenary Session

Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Page 2: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Challenges

What challenges do we face when we want to implement these research based principles of language teaching?

Page 3: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

A professional development project

Two (fairly) experienced teachers:Jeanne and Christelle (different schools)

From Macaro & Mutton 2002.

Page 4: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Method

• Focused on three lessons each.• Researcher analysed the interaction:

1. amount of participant talk; 2. turn taking patterns; 3. use of nouns and verbs

• Teacher watched video, examined the analysis, commented on it.

Page 5: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Christelle’s three lessons.

Lesson 1 (51.5 minutes)

Lesson 2 (42.5 minutes)

Lesson 3 (54.8 minutes)

% of whole lesson

% of interaction

% of whole lesson

% of interaction

% of whole lesson

% of interaction

Total 1:30 interaction time

58.3 79.8 71.7

Total non interaction time:

41.7 20.2 28.3

Total Teacher Talk 46 78.9 66 82.7 56.6 78.9

Total Students Talk

12.2 20.9 13.8 17.2 15.1 21.1

Christelle unable to change pattern of Interaction over 3 lessons

Page 6: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Jeanne’s three lessons. Lesson 1 (53.2 minutes)

Lesson 2 (67.3 minutes)

Lesson 3 (49.5 minutes)

% of whole lesson

% of interaction

% of whole lesson

% of interaction

% of whole lesson

% of interaction

Total 1:30 interaction time

66 65.6 88.3

Total non interaction time:

34 34.4 11.7

Total Teacher Talk 52 78.7 53.2 81.0 59.9 67.7

Total Students Talk 14 21.2 12.4 18.9 28.4 32.0

Lesson 3: Jeanne made determined effort to change the pattern of interaction

Page 7: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Christelle’s Turn Analysis for Lesson 2Total length of sequence

Total &Mean length of teacher turns

Total &Mean length of student Turns

Longest student (L2) turn

Sequence 1(Q&A sequence: single word responses)

104.4 seconds

(85.3 seconds)5.6 seconds

(19.1 seconds)1.1 seconds

3.5 seconds

Sequence 2(team game – single word responses)

415.2 seconds

(345.0 seconds)8.8 seconds

(70.2 seconds)1.8 seconds

4.6 seconds

Page 8: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Teacher: JeanneLesson: 2

Total length of sequence

Total Length and Mean length of teacher turns

Total Length and Mean length of student Turns

Longest student (L2) turn

Sequence 1(Q&A: single word responses)

91.3 seconds (74.3 seconds)5.3 seconds

(17 seconds)1.3 seconds

2.8 seconds

Sequence 2(Q&A: single word responses)

122.1 seconds

(101.8 seconds)6.3 seconds

(20.3 seconds)1.2 seconds

2.4 seconds

Jeanne’s Turn Analysis for Lesson 2

Page 9: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Total length of sequence

Total Length &Mean length of teacher turns

Total Length &Mean length of student Turns

Longest student (L2) turn

SequenceQ&A:single/ multiple phrase responses

292 seconds 132.2 seconds4.1 seconds

147. 6seconds4.7 seconds

17.3 seconds

Jeanne made determined effortto change pattern of interaction

Jeanne’s Turn Analysis for Lesson 3

Page 10: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Noun and Verb patterns in Christelle’s interaction with class

Lesson 1 Lesson 2 Lesson 3

Teacher pupils Teacher pupils Teacher pupils

Nouns 231 109 396 110 429 174

Verbs 281 35 343 46 430 32

Page 11: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Lesson 1 Lesson 2 Lesson 3

Teacher pupils Teacher pupils Teacher pupils

Nouns 350 137 564 297 443 173

Verbs 283 56 412 32 727 291

Noun and Verb patterns in Jeanne’s interaction with class

Page 12: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Discussion

What could have made it possible for Jeanne to bring about change in her interaction but not Christelle?

Page 13: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

The power of assessment• MFL teaching is very strongly influenced by the

assessment system• Currently we have the National Curriculum system of

assessment• We believe: in order to work towards the 8 principles

the assessment system needs to change.

Page 14: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

A new assessment system…• Will prioritise skills development based on what

research tells us about how learners progress in the 4 skills

• Linguistic knowledge (vocabulary and grammar) will be a supporting strand in assessment not a leading strand

• ‘process’ will need to be assessed as well as ‘product’ – strategic behaviour of students monitored

• 8 levels of attainment will (probably) be reduced• A best fit approach will be used• Teacher professionalism trusted to make judgements

as well as objective measurements

Page 15: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

Our invitation to you!• Help us develop a new and research-based

system of assessment by trying it out in your schools and giving us feedback

• We will work with you and offer support at a distance

• Materials on website – details to follow• Please now look at your second questionnaire

and complete it, if you are happy to do so• Evaluation sheet!

Page 16: Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL

To be added to the #PDC

list on twitter, follow @HeikeBruton.

Follow our PDC in MFL blog:

pdcinmfl.wordpress.com