final performance report - sawpa.org · site project control4 project control project control...
TRANSCRIPT
Project: Santa Ana Sucker
Habitat Protection & Beneficial
Use Enhancement Project
Project Proponent: Santa Ana
Watershed Project Authority
Report Prepared For: U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service
Final Performance
Report
www.sawpa.org | July 2019
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
1
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cooperative Funding Agreement: F15AC00763
Funding Agreement Award Total: $37,000
Project Proponent: Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)
Project Name: Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
Contact: SAWPA Senior Watershed Manager Ian Achimore, [email protected]; (951) 354-4233
Cover Photo: Taken October 15, 2018 from the Van Buren Boulevard Bridge after project construction.
Thanks: To project-partner Orange County Water District for providing guidance and technical
assistance related to the planning and biological monitoring of the project.
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
2
Table of Contents Overview of Project Proponent .................................................................................................................... 4
Overview of Project Objectives and Design .................................................................................................. 5
Overview of Project Construction ................................................................................................................. 7
Project Completion and Habitat Features .................................................................................................... 8
Project Monitoring ........................................................................................................................................ 9
Low-Flow Channel Invert Elevation ........................................................................................................ 10
Sediment Transport Characteristics ........................................................................................................ 11
Substrate Data ........................................................................................................................................ 15
Water Quality Data ................................................................................................................................. 17
Fish Population Monitoring .................................................................................................................... 17
Lessons Learned from Project ..................................................................................................................... 18
Mutual Benefits from Project ..................................................................................................................... 20
Tables
Table 1: Habitat Structure Design Alternatives ............................................................................................ 5
Table 2: Timeline of Construction Activities ................................................................................................. 8
Table 3: Streamflow Monitoring Results .................................................................................................... 11
Table 4: Gradations Plotted in Figures 8 and 9 ........................................................................................... 12
Table 5: Substrate Monitoring Results........................................................................................................ 16
Table 6: Water Quality Sampling ................................................................................................................ 17
Table 7: Fish Monitoring Results ................................................................................................................. 18
Figures
Figure 1: Rendering of Partially Submerged Groin ....................................................................................... 6
Figure 2: Project Map .................................................................................................................................... 7
Figure 3: Project Construction with Protective Berm ................................................................................... 8
Figure 4: Habitat Structure Features ............................................................................................................ 9
Figure 5: Monitoring Points ........................................................................................................................ 10
Figure 6: Low-Flow Channel Invert Elevation Change ................................................................................ 11
Figure 7: Scheevel Engineering Sampling Along Transect Width................................................................ 12
Figure 8: Bed Load Particle Size at Project Site Right Bank......................................................................... 13
Figure 9: Bed Load Particle Size at Control Site Right Bank ........................................................................ 13
Figure 10: Percent of Total Bed Load Traveling Along Right Bank .............................................................. 14
Figure 11: Streamflow at the MWD Crossing Gaging Station ..................................................................... 15
Figure 12: Percent Sand .............................................................................................................................. 16
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
3
Attachments
Attachment A: Detailed Summary of Streamflow Variables Attachment B: Detailed Summary of Gradation Measurements Attachment C: Field Monitoring Datasheets Attachment D: Final Project Plan Drawings Attachment E: Pre and Post-Project Photos
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
4
Overview of Project Proponent
The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) is a Joint Powers Authority, classified as a Special
District (a non-federal governmental sub-entity of the State of California) and located in Riverside,
California. SAWPA has five member agencies: Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Inland Empire
Utilities Agency (IEUA), Orange County Water District (OCWD), San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water
District (SBVMWD), and Western Municipal Water District (WMWD). SAWPA’s mission is to develop and
maintain regional plans, programs, and projects that will protect the Santa Ana River Watershed to
maximize beneficial uses in an economically and environmentally responsible manner. SAWPA staff
serves at the direction of the SAWPA Commission which is composed of one representative from each of
its five member agencies, all of which have statutory authority over water supply and water
management in their service areas.
SAWPA administers the Santa Ana Sucker Conservation Team (Team)1, an
inter-agency task force that reflects the involvement and participation of
over 20 agencies and non-profit organizations throughout the Santa Ana
River Watershed. Started in 1998, the Team’s purpose is to determine the
reasons for the decline of the Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus santaanae)
in the Santa Ana River Watershed and devise strategies for its recovery.
In 2000, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed the Santa Ana
sucker as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act. The fish is a small short-lived member of the
of the sucker family, Catostomidae, and is one of only a few native freshwater fish species currently
extant in southern California. The species is named suckers primarily because of the downward
orientation and anatomy of their mouth parts, which allow them to suck up algae, small invertebrates,
and other organic matter with their fleshy and protrusible lips.2 Per the USFWS’s Santa Ana Sucker
Recovery Plan, the primary threat to the species is habitat loss, degradation, and modification through
hydrological modifications range-wide.
SAWPA and the Team were able to complete the Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use
Enhancement Project (Project) with the active involvement from staff from the following partners:
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS),
• OCWD,
• SBVMWD,
• Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board,
• Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District, and
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
1 Team members contributing funding include the City of Riverside, OCWD, SBVMWD and the other three SAWPA member agencies. 2 Moyle, P.B. 2002. Inland Fishes of California: Revised and Expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
5
Overview of Project Objectives and Design
The purpose of the project is to enhance Santa Ana sucker and other native fish habitat in the
Santa Ana River by creating localized erosion to expose existing gravel beds and cobbles - the
preferred habitat of the sucker. With funding provided by several sources, including the USFWS
Cooperative Funding Agreement, SAWPA worked with the partners to develop a feasibility
study (study) that included conceptual designs for habitat structures and cost/benefit analyses
of each concept. The study, completed by SAWPA consultant Scheevel Engineering in October
2017, presented six design alternatives shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Habitat Structure Design Alternatives
Habitat Structure Description Construction Cost Estimate
#1 Partially Submerged Groin
Rock groin protruding from river bank into active low flow channel. Groin tapper from high at bank edge to subsurface in channel
$136,600
#2 Open Water Runner
A structure in or near the center of the low flow channel with longitudinal edges and an upstream flow collector
$157,600
#3 Elevated Invert A riverbank structure within an existing deep pool area with bed load exclusion capabilities
$167,900
#4 Invert Cross Runner
Relatively narrow rock structure placed across the width of a channel section, at an elevation slightly above the existing river channel invert
$214,500
#5 Boulder Array Lager boulders (> 4’) placed within the low flow channel along with placement of smaller boulders & cobbles in high velocity areas
Not Evaluated
#6 Constricted Channel
Improvements to both riverbanks and the channel invert to construct a durable river section with defined hydraulic and sediment transport properties
Not Evaluated
SAWPA and its project partners chose option #1, the partially submerged groin, because its
costs are within the available budget, it is comparatively easier to construct, the project site’s
physical conditions are conducive to the design, and the structure is more durable in high flows
than some of the alternatives. The partially submerged groin includes the following features:
• A tapered groin to function in a range of water and substrate elevations,
• A large boulder at the end of the groin to split stream flows into two so they pass by each
side of downstream boulders, and
• A sub-surface base of rip rap 2 feet deep supporting the structure’s rocks and boulders to
help withstand flows up to 2,500 cubic feet per second (cfs).
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
6
The study includes specific information on the design such as the useful habitat area created
(500 square feet as shown in Figure 1), an analysis of the study area, construction
requirements, site access and mobilization, and equipment mix and operating hours.
Flow rates in the Santa Ana River at the MWD Crossing Stream Gage Station, which is 0.7 miles
upstream from the selected project site, generally range from 30 to 100 cfs during the non-
storm season. Flows exceeded 2,500 cfs 11 times over the 17 preceding years so the expected
useful life included in the study was 2-3 years. More heavily armored and permanent structures
were evaluated but were considered infeasible due to the available funding.
At the time of construction, the low-flow channel was in relatively the center of the river
channel. Google Earth aerial photographs show that the low-flow channel abutted the north
embankment of the River channel from the 1990s until November 2009 (the date of the last
Google Earth photographs that shows it at this location). After November 2009, it moved to its
present location at roughly the center of the River channel.
As shown in Figure 2, the selected project site is at 457033.1 E 3758191.3 N (UTM),
approximately 50 feet upstream from the Van Buren Boulevard Bridge along the right bank of
the Santa Ana River’s low-flow channel. The land is owned by the Riverside County Regional
Park and Open-Space District, a public agency that manages recreational and open-space
resources in Riverside County. The site was chosen due to the ease for heavy equipment to
access the river bottom and the elevation change of the riverbed in the area. At this location,
the bed has an increasing slope, between 0.2 and 0.8 percent, depending on the time of year
and aggradation/degradation cycles, from the upstream point of the work area downstream to
the bridge. The study explains that as the habitat structure scours sand, the slope helps move
Figure 1: Rendering of Partially Submerged Groin
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
7
Figure 2: Project Map
particles through the system instead of settling on the bed and covering the habitat structure.
In general, the bed material in the area is classified as medium sand. This portion of the river is
also important due this prevalence of this sand, which results in a lack of habitat complexity.
The Santa Ana River Habitat Survey, which has collected data annually from 2006 to 2018,
indicates that the primary substrate type downstream of the Market Street Bridge is sand.
Overview of Project Construction
SAWPA staff received approval from the SAWPA Commission May 15, 2018 to release a Notice
Inviting Bids that included a mandatory pre-bid meeting at the project site. On June 21, 2018
only one bid from AToM Engineering Construction Inc. of $198,398 was received, which is 67
percent over the engineering estimate of $118,571. On July 17, 2018, staff received approval
from the SAWPA Commission to reject the sole bid and construct the project internally.
Construction activities included clearing approximately 0.2 acres of riparian vegetation along
the right bank, grubbing the 0.1 mile-long access road and staging area along the river, creating
a two foot tall in-stream protective berm around the perimeter of the work area, delivering 120
cubic yards of rock to the site, removing 120 cubic yards of sand from the site per permit
In-Stream Work Area
N Access Road
Bridge
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
8
requirements, excavating 2 feet below the river bed, placing the rock with excavators and
completing the final grading of the staging area. A long reach excavator was used on October 15
to finish the project and place rock upstream of the groin.
Three general gradations of rock were used: 1) boulders generally 4 feet in diameter, 2) riprap
generally 2 feet in diameter, and 3) cobble generally 1 to 6 inches in diameter. The cost of
construction totaled to approximately $70,000.
Table 2: Timeline of Construction Activities
Dates (2018) Description
September 26 Trash and invasive species removal in Project area
October 3 – 4 Vegetation removal along access road and bank for heavy equipment
October 8 Grading of the access road to allow access of heavy equipment to the low-flow channel
October 9 – 10 Rock delivery to the Project staging area
October 10 – 12 Berm creation and placement of rock into protected area in the low-flow channel
October 12 - 15 Final rock placement and grading of the staging area
October 24 Replanting native vegetation (0.30 acre) adjacent to work area to mitigate project impacts
Project Completion and Habitat Features
Construction was completed on October 15 and the features of the habitat structure, shown in
Figure 4, included cobble aprons in the footprint of the instream work area, the partially
Figure 3: Project Construction with Protective Berm
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
9
submerged rock groin, and two clusters of boulders both upstream and downstream of the
groin.
Figure 4: Habitat Structure Features
Project Monitoring
The project site, as well as a control site approximately 0.25 miles upstream in the Santa Ana
River, were monitored before and after construction of the habitat structure in order to
determine the success of the project. The location of the control point is at 11 N 457424
3758312 (UTM). Monitoring of the following parameters were conducted by SAWPA, Scheevel
Engineering and OCWD:
a) Low-flow channel invert elevation,*
b) Streamflow,*
c) Bedload,*
d) Channel width,*
e) Maximum depth,*
f) Depth at banks,*
g) River substrate composition,**
h) Riparian vegetation canopy cover over the transect,**
i) Dissolved oxygen, temperature and water appearance,*
j) Fish count,** and
k) Documentation of gravel/sand bars.**
Those parameters marked with “*” were measured along a transect line drawn from bank to
bank in the low flow channel. Those marked with “**” were measured within a transect band
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
10
with a longitudinal length that was 50 feet upstream and 50 feet downstream of the transect
line.
Figure 5: Monitoring Points
Low-Flow Channel Invert Elevation
The first project survey of the riverbed’s invert elevation3 was performed by Scheevel
Engineering on 5/16/2017 to set elevation benchmarks. As the structure was to be placed
directly in the perennial low-flow channel, it was important to set a reference point that would
determine the final elevation of the groin relative to the bank during construction. Overall, 12
invert elevation samples were collected during baseflow-only periods from 5/16/2017 to
4/29/2019 with the exception of one measurement on 10/15/2018 which occurred
immediately following a 2,000 cfs peak flow event. Per Figure 6, the 12 samples show a pattern
of regular aggradation and degradation over a range of approximately 1 foot.
3 The lowest part of a channel below the normal high-water mark.
N
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
11
Figure 6: Low-Flow Channel Invert Elevation Change
Sediment Transport Characteristics
The project will successfully provide habitat to native fish if it scours finer materials, such as
clay, silt and sand, from the project area in order to uncover gravel beds beneath the upper
substrate. To evaluate its success, as well as inform sediment transport models used by other
water agencies in the region, streamflow and bedload (sediment transportation along the
riverbed) were measured at the project and control sites. As the structure was placed on the
right bank, the control’s right bank served as a good comparison as it had similar characteristics
of depth, velocity, bedload discharge, bedload gradation and bed material gradation. Scheevel
Engineering used a FlowTracker 2 streamflow measurement system to collect stream velocity
speeds, velocity vectors, temperature and depth along the transect width at two-foot (or less)
intervals. The streamflow discharge measurement results are provided below in Table 3. A
detailed summary of the variables measured can be found in Appendix A.
Table 3: Streamflow Monitoring Results
Date 9/19/2018 10/29/2018 12/21/2018 4/29/2019
Site Project Control4 Project Control Project Control Project Control
CFS 29.8177 25.0597 40.4206 40.9646 47.9364 49.9559 37.0057 37.1447
Bedload samples were collected along the transect line at two-foot intervals across the entire
transect width. The project’s channel width ranged from 17.2 meters to 19.4 meters, and the
control’s channel width ranged from 14.9 meters to 21.6 meters. After sampling, laboratory
4 The Control site was measured on a separate day than the project: 9/21/2019.
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
INV
ERT
CH
AN
GE
(FEE
T)
DATE
Project Site
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
12
analysis was performed on the sediment samples to evaluate total mass measurements (to
quantify total bedload movement) and sieve analysis (to determine bedload gradation).
Figure 7: Scheevel Engineering Sampling Along Transect Width
The sieve analysis was performed using the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM)
standard “D422.” Gradation curves were then developed for each collected sample by plotting
the data by site, date sampled and sample location along the transect width (i.e. right bank,
center and left bank). Figures 8 and 9 represent the right bank data in the relevant ASTM D422
class, shown in Table 3, with coarser particles failing to pass through progressively smaller sieve
sizes. A detailed summary of the variables measured can be found in Appendix B.
Table 4: Gradations Plotted in Figures 8 and 9
Unified Class U.S. Sieve Size Materials Passing Sieve
Coarse Gravel 19 mm or 3/4"
Finer
Fine Gravel 12.5 mm or 1/2"
Fine Gravel 9.5 mm or 3/8"
Coarse Sand 4.75 mm or No.4
Coarse Sand 2.36 mm or No.8
Medium Sand 1.18 mm or No.16
Medium Sand 0.6 mm or No.30
Fine Sand 0.3 mm or No.50
Fine Sand 0.15 mm or No.100
Fine Sand 0.075 mm or No.200
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
13
Figure 8: Bed Load Particle Size at Project Site Right Bank
Figure 9: Bed Load Particle Size at Control Site Right Bank
The 2018/2019 storm season was relatively wet with several very large flow events at the
project site. High flow events can create shifts in bed load transport which must be considered
when drawing conclusions across the various sampling events. As shown in Figure 8, there is a
clear reduction in medium to fine sand along the right bank at the project site between the
December and April sampling events. In comparison, the control site had a clear shift to finer
material across all particle sizes. The gradation curves for the first three samples at the control
show different behaviors in the bedload movement, whereby particle sizes stayed relatively
static across the first three site visits. This reveals that the hydraulics created by the groin and
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Pe
rce
nt
Fin
er
By
We
igh
t
Larger Particle Size Smaller
9/19/2018 10/29/2018 12/21/2018 4/29/2019
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Pe
rce
nt
Fin
er
By
We
igh
t
Larger Particle Size Smaller
9/19/2018 10/29/2018 14/21/2018 4/29/2019
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
14
boulder cluster are effective at excluding the medium to very fine sands in the vicinity of the
groin.
Another demonstration of the project’s benefit is seen in Figure 10 below, which illustrates a
declining trend in the project’s total sampled bed load moving along the right bank through the
third sampling event. Similar to the bed load particle size analysis above, the high flow events
upset the trends observed early in the storm season. However, the first three sampling events
indicate that the habitat structure was successful at pushing more particles to the center and
left bank. The April sampling event does indicate a spike in total load along the right bank,
however, when considering this with the above particle size shift, this reveals that the sediment
moving along the right side of the project site in April was overall coarser. Meaning that the
hydraulics are capable of moving larger particles and can scour and remove sands to ultimately
expose a coarser substrate.
Figure 10: Percent of Total Bed Load Traveling Along Right Bank
The project site’s April sampling outlier is likely due to the relatively wet winter where peak
flows exceeded 25,000 cfs at the MWD Crossing Stream Gage Station (daily mean
approximately 7,000 cfs). The past two storm seasons are reflected in the streamflow data in
Figure 11 that is collected by the MWD Crossing Stream Gage Station. The storm season of
2018-19 began earlier, lasted longer, and lead to larger flows in the Santa Ana River.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%Project Site BaselineRight Bank 9/19/2018Project Site Post 1 RightBank 10/29/2018Project Site Post 2 RightBank 12/21/2018Project Site Post 3 RightBank 4/29/2019Control Site BaselineRight Bank 9/21/2018Control Site Post 1 RightBank 10/29/2018Control Site Post 2 RigthBank 12/21/2018Control Site Post 3 RightBank 4/29/2019
Project Control
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
15
Figure 11: Streamflow at the MWD Crossing Gaging Station
As stated above, the project was designed for a peak flow regime of up to 2,500 cfs and
performed well throughout the majority of the monitoring period. Photos of the structure,
taken at different times before and after construction, are shown in Appendix E. More
information on the project performance is discussed in the sections below.
Substrate Data
Using the Santa Ana River Habitat Survey (also known as the Riverwalk) methodology, SAWPA
and OCWD visually surveyed the low-flow channel’s substrate within the 100 foot-long transect
areas. Through visual observation, SAWPA and OCWD determined the amount (in percentages)
of five substrate classifications. These categories included:
• Mud/Silt: Particles that become dusty when dry and are easily brushed off hands;
• Sand: Generally described as tiny, gritty particles of rock up to 0.1 inch that is smaller
than gravel, but coarser than silt;
• Gravel: Particles that range in size from one-quarter inch to approximately 2.5 inches.
Fine grain is generally described as being pea size to marble size and coarse gravel is
generally described as being marble size to tennis ball size;
• Cobbles: Rocks between 2.5 and 10 inches in size. Generally, in size between a tennis
ball and basketball; and
• Boulders: Rocks 10-12 inches in size or larger.
As shown in Table 5, the majority of the substrate material before and after project
construction is sand. Cobble and boulders are present after the construction of the project, but
cobble does disappear for the April 29, 2019 sampling data which occurred after the 2018-19
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10
/1/2
01
7
11
/1/2
01
7
12
/1/2
01
7
1/1
/20
18
2/1
/20
18
3/1
/20
18
4/1
/20
18
5/1
/20
18
6/1
/20
18
7/1
/20
18
8/1
/20
18
9/1
/20
18
10
/1/2
01
8
11
/1/2
01
8
12
/1/2
01
8
1/1
/20
19
2/1
/20
19
3/1
/20
19
4/1
/20
19
5/1
/20
19
Cu
bic
Fe
et
Pe
r Se
con
d (
Dai
ly M
ean
)
Date
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
16
storm season shown in Figure 11. By looking at just the percent of sand at the both sites over
time, Figure 12 below shows that the structure is successful at reducing the amount of this finer
material in comparison to the control.
Table 5: Substrate Monitoring Results
Sampling Date Substrate Class Project Control
9/19/2018 Mud/Silt 0% 5%
Sand 100% 90%
Gravel 0% 5%
Cobble 0% 0%
Boulder 0% 0%
10/29/2018 Mud/Silt 15% 20%
Sand 72% 75%
Gravel 2% 5%
Cobble 8% 0%
Boulder 3% 0%
12/21/2018 Mud/Silt 10% 5%
Sand 72% 92%
Gravel 5% 3%
Cobble 8% 0%
Boulder 5% 0%
4/29/2019 Mud/Silt 7% 0%
Sand 90% 100%
Gravel 0% 0%
Cobble 0% 0%
Boulder 3% 0%
Figure 12: Percent Sand
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
9/19/2018 10/29/2018 12/21/2018 4/29/2019
Project Control
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
17
Water Quality Data
Water quality data was taken before and after the project was constructed at the project and
control sites. The temperature and dissolved oxygen measurements were collected using a YSI
ProODO Optical Dissolved Oxygen instrument that was calibrated by OCWD staff before field
sampling. The water appearance data was collected through visual observation.
According to the USFWS’s Recovery Plan for the Santa Ana Sucker, specific tolerances to water
quality variables such as water temperature, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity have not been
determined for the species. However, the fish is most abundant in clear water at temperatures
that are typically less than 22° C5. As shown in Table 6 below, temperatures did not increase
above 22° C at either site.
Table 6: Water Quality Sampling
Sampling Date Water Quality Parameter Project Control
9/19/2018 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L; % saturation) 8.31; 88.5 8.19; 91.1
Temperature (C) 19.1 20.6
Water Appearance Clear Clear
10/29/2018 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L; % saturation) 8.16; 89.2 8.47; 90.1
Temperature (C) 19.7 18.3
Water Appearance Clear Clear
12/21/2018 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L; % saturation) 8.72; 93.6 8.83; 93.7
Temperature (C) 18.7 18.2
Water Appearance Clear Clear
4/29/2019 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L; % saturation) 8.43; 95.6 8.24; 94.1
Temperature (C) 21.6 21.9
Water Appearance Clear Clear
Fish Population Monitoring
The fish count was performed by sweeping the transect band with an underwater high
definition camera attached to an adjustable grip, which was set to a length of approximately
four feet. Electrofish, snorkeling and seining were considered as possible methods but due to
the available project budget, underwater video recording was done. The project site’s right
bank was swept due to the location of the groin, but the control site’s left bank was swept due
to similar characteristics, such as riparian vegetation and channel features, to the project’s right
bank. The footage recorded was reviewed by SAWPA and OCWD staff and fish were identified
5 Moyle, P.B. 2002. Inland Fishes of California: Revised and Expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
18
and counted using the Field Guide to the Western Riverside County Multispecies Habitat
Conservation Plan Covered Fish Species.
Table 7: Fish Monitoring Results
Sampling Date Fish (Common Name) Project Control
9/19/2018 Santa Ana Sucker 0 2
Western Mosquitofish 35 12
Fathead Minnow 0 2
Arroyo Chub 0 7
10/29/2018 Santa Ana Sucker 3 1
Western Mosquitofish 1 0
12/21/2018 Santa Ana Sucker 2 0
Western Mosquitofish 1 0
4/29/2019 Western Mosquitofish 183 129
Arroyo Chub 20 0
Bullfrog Tadpole 0 1
Native Fish Count (Totals) 25 10
Non-Native Fish Count (Totals) 220 144
As shown in Table 7 above, like the post-project beneficial bedload and substrate trends, there
was an increase in native fish after implementation of the project. In total, there were more
native fish observed at the project site in comparison to the control. Video footage shows Santa
Ana suckers using the cobble for shelter and the gravel to feed. Suckers were seen at the
control site near the edge of the underwater riparian root systems growing along the banks.
Lessons Learned from Project
There are three major lessons learned from the project’s construction phase:
• It was difficult to receive a competitive bid for construction;
• Security guards were needed nightly during the construction phase; and
• Project implementation moved rapidly once access to the in-stream work area was
established.
As described earlier in this report, SAWPA decided to hold a mandatory pre-bid meeting.
Unfortunately, only one bid that was 67 percent over the engineering estimate was received.
After discussions with the contractors who attended the pre-bid meeting, this was due to the
region’s abundance of potential public works projects as well as the perceived risk of working in
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
19
an in-stream environment. Since most in-stream public works projects are flood control-
related, this project was likely not seen as worth the perceived risk of flooding and vandalism.
Several homeless encampments existed nearby the project during construction. Although the
encampments were not an issue during construction operating hours, a front-end loader was
vandalized the night of October 11, 2018. This delayed project construction by approximately 6
hours. Due to the relatively short construction timeline for this type of project, acquiring a
private security guard was deemed cost-effective for the remainder of the project timeline
since rented construction equipment was left in the river-area overnight. As shown in Table 2,
the construction moved rapidly after the access road was graded and vegetation along the bank
was removed. This short timeline was able to keep construction costs low at approximately
$70,000. Removing vegetation for access, and the resulting mitigation needed, will increase the
costs for future in-stream habitat projects.
The overall lesson learned from the project’s monitoring phase was that the structure
performed as designed up to its 2,500 cfs threshold. There was a clear reduction in medium to
fine sand along the right bank at the project site between the December and April sampling
events and a general increase in fines at the control site. As shown in Appendix E though,
photos document that over the course of the winter of 2018/19, sand was deposited upstream
and downstream of the groin and boulder cluster. Although still providing habitat value per the
fish monitoring data in Table 7, stormflows above the 2,500 cfs threshold affected the
performance of the structure.
The monitoring by Scheevel Engineering concludes that there are two major options for
modifying instream rock habitat structures if the goal is to increase their effectiveness following
high flow events:
• Artificially increase the instream grade of the project’s reach to quickly move deposited
sand off the habitat structure; and
• Install a complimentary structure across the width of the low-flow channel and/or on
the opposite bank to control the hydraulics entering and exiting the reach as well as
control the low flow channel invert elevation.
The project benefited from the existing increasing slope, between 0.2 and 0.8 percent, which
helped ensure finer particles moved along the riverbed. However, very high flow events
resulted in the deposition of sand bars on the habitat aprons that have not yet been scoured
away. Future base flows and storm flows may effectively remove the sand bars, but a faster
recovery of the habitat structure would be possible if the hydraulics and channel invert could
be controlled across the entire low flow channel. If sufficient funding is available, a future
project could contour and slope a section of the low flow channel invert by excavating the
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
20
riverbed and installing a graded stone/riprap base. The resulting construction costs would be
high as the low-flow channel would need to be diverted and the excavated material would need
to be hauled off-site. A less expensive option is to build two complimentary groins on either
bank along with a narrow full channel width invert stabilizer. The groins would act together to
reduce the area of the low-flow channel, and thus force higher velocity streamflow into the
center of the channel. These higher velocity waters would help move scoured finer materials
away from the structures and protect either bank from being inundated during storm and
baseflow periods. In very high flow events sand would be deposited in all areas across the low-
flow channel regardless of the habitat structure’s configuration. However, the placement of
rock features across the invert would help to create the hydraulics to quickly scour sands from
the habitat feature during subsequent base flow periods.
Mutual Benefits from Project
The study and this report have been shared with members of the Santa Ana Sucker
Conservation Team and the USACE has already used the study to help design their three-acre
Santa Ana Sucker In-Stream Habitat Mitigation Project. SBVMWD is also using the study and
this report to plan the design of their habitat mitigation project that is required as part of the
construction of the Sterling Natural Resources Center. Trends seen in this report’s sediment
transport data can be used to plan the design of other habitat structures by relating the
sampling to other site-specific data and interpolating results. The project has also helped
sparked a renewed interest in in-stream habitat projects in the Santa Ana River and led to
further coordination between local, State and federal agencies.
Report
Attachments
Attachment A
4/24/2019 3:36:08 PM
Discharge Measurement Summary
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected] of 30
4/24/2019 3:36:08 PM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected] of 30
4/24/2019 3:36:08 PM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected] of 30
4/24/2019 3:36:08 PM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected] of 30
4/24/2019 3:36:08 PM
Automated beam check Start time 9/19/2018 7:12:26 AM
Automated beam check SNR(dB) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2137
43.6
50.2
56.8
63.4
70
Automated beam check Noise level(cnts) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21816
822.8
829.6
836.4
843.2
850
Automated beam check Peak level(dB) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2136
41.6
47.2
52.8
58.4
64
Automated beam check Peak position(ft) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 210.296
0.324
0.352
0.38
0.408
0.436
Automated beam check Quality control warnings
No quality control warnings
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
5 of 30
4/24/2019 3:37:15 PM
Discharge Measurement Summary
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
6 of 30
4/24/2019 3:37:15 PM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
7 of 30
4/24/2019 3:37:15 PM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
8 of 30
4/24/2019 3:37:15 PM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
9 of 30
4/24/2019 3:37:15 PM
Automated beam check Start time 10/29/2018 9:39:53 AM
Automated beam check SNR(dB) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2140
45
50
55
60
65
Automated beam check Noise level(cnts) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21812
818
824
830
836
842
Automated beam check Peak level(dB) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2141
46
51
56
61
66
Automated beam check Peak position(ft) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 210.355
0.366
0.377
0.388
0.399
0.41
Automated beam check Quality control warnings
No quality control warnings
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
10 of 30
4/24/2019 3:39:04 PM
Discharge Measurement Summary
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
11 of 30
4/24/2019 3:39:04 PM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
12 of 30
4/24/2019 3:39:04 PM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
13 of 30
4/24/2019 3:39:04 PM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
14 of 30
4/24/2019 3:39:04 PM
Automated beam check Start time 12/21/2018 11:57:18 AM
Automated beam check SNR(dB) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2143
45
47
49
51
53
Automated beam check Noise level(cnts) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21807
814
821
828
835
842
Automated beam check Peak level(dB) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2140
42.4
44.8
47.2
49.6
52
Automated beam check Peak position(ft) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 210.357
0.366
0.375
0.384
0.393
0.402
Automated beam check Quality control warnings
No quality control warnings
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
15 of 30
4/26/2019 11:30:38 AM
Discharge Measurement Summary
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
16 of 30
4/26/2019 11:30:38 AM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
17 of 30
4/26/2019 11:30:38 AM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
18 of 30
4/26/2019 11:30:38 AM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
19 of 30
4/26/2019 11:30:38 AM
Automated beam check Start time 9/21/2018 2:04:36 PM
Automated beam check SNR(dB) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2135
37.4
39.8
42.2
44.6
47
Automated beam check Noise level(cnts) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21776
782.8
789.6
796.4
803.2
810
Automated beam check Peak level(dB) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2135
37.4
39.8
42.2
44.6
47
Automated beam check Peak position(ft) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 210.356
0.368
0.38
0.392
0.404
0.416
Automated beam check Quality control warnings
No quality control warnings
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
20 of 30
4/26/2019 11:31:09 AM
Discharge Measurement Summary
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
21 of 30
4/26/2019 11:31:09 AM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
22 of 30
4/26/2019 11:31:09 AM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
23 of 30
4/26/2019 11:31:09 AM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
24 of 30
4/26/2019 11:31:09 AM
Automated beam check Start time 10/29/2018 8:30:31 AM
Automated beam check SNR(dB) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2138
42.8
47.6
52.4
57.2
62
Automated beam check Noise level(cnts) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21818
824.2
830.4
836.6
842.8
849
Automated beam check Peak level(dB) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2137
43.4
49.8
56.2
62.6
69
Automated beam check Peak position(ft) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 210.365
0.373
0.381
0.389
0.397
0.405
Automated beam check Quality control warnings
No quality control warnings
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
25 of 30
4/26/2019 11:31:33 AM
Discharge Measurement Summary
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
26 of 30
4/26/2019 11:31:33 AM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
27 of 30
4/26/2019 11:31:33 AM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
28 of 30
4/26/2019 11:31:33 AM
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
29 of 30
4/26/2019 11:31:33 AM
Automated beam check Start time 12/21/2018 10:49:52 AM
Automated beam check SNR(dB) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2138
40.4
42.8
45.2
47.6
50
Automated beam check Noise level(cnts) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21809
815.4
821.8
828.2
834.6
841
Automated beam check Peak level(dB) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2142
43.6
45.2
46.8
48.4
50
Automated beam check Peak position(ft) PASS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 210.348
0.362
0.376
0.39
0.404
0.418
Automated beam check Quality control warnings
No quality control warnings
Scheevel Engineering ● P.O. Box 28745 Anaheim, CA 92809 ● (714) 470-9045 ● [email protected]
30 of 30
Attachment B
Detailed Summary of Gradation Measurements
Bed Load Sampling: 2 Foot Interval and 20 Second DurationSample Site Project Site Project Site Project Site Control Site Control Site Control Site Project Site Project Site Project Site Control Site Control Site
Sample Event Baseline Baseline Baseline Baseline Baseline Baseline Post Project 1 Post Project 1 Post Project 1 Post Project 1 Post Project 1Sample ID # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Sample Location Left 1/3 Center 1/3 Right 1/3 Left 1/3 Center 1/3 Right 1/3 Left 1/3 Center 1/3 Right 1/3 Left 1/3 Center 1/3Date 9/19/2018 9/19/2018 9/19/2018 9/21/2018 9/21/2018 9/21/2018 10/29/2018 10/29/2018 10/29/2018 10/29/2018 10/29/2018
Station Limit 45 25 3 3 21 39 6 30 44 3 21Station Limit 65 43 23 19 37 67 28 42 68 19 43
Flow Rate (cfs) 29.8 29.8 29.8 25.1 25.1 25.1 40.4 40.4 40.4 41.0 41.0Sample Weight (grams) 137.3 831.4 315.5 758.3 123.8 163.4 714.9 533.5 197.9 504.3 520.0
Bed Load Calc. (tons per day) 5.23 31.67 12.02 28.89 4.72 6.22 27.23 20.32 7.54 19.21 19.81 Bed Load Calc. (cy per day) 1.3 4.02 24.36 9.25 22.22 3.63 4.79 20.95 15.63 5.80 14.78 15.24
% of Total 11% 65% 25% 73% 12% 16% 49% 37% 14% 33% 35%
Unified Class U.S. Sieve mm % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % PassingCobbles 6" Cobbles 152.4 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Cobbles 3" Cobbles 76.2 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Coarse Gravel 2" Coarse Gravel 50 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Coarse Gravel 1‐1/2" Coarse Gravel 38.1 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Coarse Gravel 1" Coarse Gravel 25 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Coarse Gravel 3/4" Coarse Gravel 19 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Fine Gravel 1/2" Fine Gravel 12.5 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Fine Gravel 3/8" Fine Gravel 9.5 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99%Coarse Sand No.4 Coarse Sand 4.75 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97%Coarse Sand No.8 Coarse Sand 2.36 97% 96% 99% 97% 93% 96% 95% 94% 99% 95% 91%Medium Sand No.16 Med Sand 1.18 81% 77% 87% 76% 66% 70% 76% 72% 87% 70% 69%Medium Sand No.30 Med Sand 0.6 35% 35% 37% 30% 24% 24% 35% 28% 43% 26% 27%Fine Sand No.50 Fine Sand 0.3 4% 5% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 5% 2% 3%Fine Sand No.100 Fine Sand 0.15 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Fine Sand No.200 Fine Sand 0.075 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Silt Silt 0.036 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Silt Silt 0.023 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Silt Silt 0.013 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Silt Silt 0.009 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Silt Silt 0.007 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Clay Clay 0.005 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Clay Clay 0.003 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Clay Clay 0.001 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
1
Detailed Summary of Gradation Measurements
Sample SiteSample EventSample ID #
Sample LocationDate
Station LimitStation Limit
Flow Rate (cfs)Sample Weight (grams)
Bed Load Calc. (tons per day)Bed Load Calc. (cy per day) 1.3
% of Total
Unified Class U.S. Sieve mmCobbles 6" Cobbles 152.4Cobbles 3" Cobbles 76.2
Coarse Gravel 2" Coarse Gravel 50Coarse Gravel 1‐1/2" Coarse Gravel 38.1Coarse Gravel 1" Coarse Gravel 25Coarse Gravel 3/4" Coarse Gravel 19Fine Gravel 1/2" Fine Gravel 12.5Fine Gravel 3/8" Fine Gravel 9.5Coarse Sand No.4 Coarse Sand 4.75Coarse Sand No.8 Coarse Sand 2.36Medium Sand No.16 Med Sand 1.18Medium Sand No.30 Med Sand 0.6Fine Sand No.50 Fine Sand 0.3Fine Sand No.100 Fine Sand 0.15Fine Sand No.200 Fine Sand 0.075
Silt Silt 0.036Silt Silt 0.023Silt Silt 0.013Silt Silt 0.009Silt Silt 0.007Clay Clay 0.005Clay Clay 0.003Clay Clay 0.001
Control Site Project Site Project Site Project Site Control Site Control Site Control Site Project Site Project Site Project SitePost Project 1 Post Project 2 Post Project 2 Post Project 2 Post Project 2 Post Project 2 Post Project 2 Post Project 3 Post Project 3 Post Project 3
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Right 1/3 Left 1/3 Center 1/3 Right 1/3 Left 1/3 Center 1/3 Right 1/3 Left 1/3 Center 1/3 Right 1/310/29/2018 12/21/2018 12/21/2018 12/21/2018 12/21/2018 12/21/2018 12/21/2018 4/29/2019 4/29/2019 4/29/201945 7 25 39 5 25 37 8 24 4261 23 37 57 23 35 53 24 40 6041.0 47.9 47.9 47.9 50.0 50.0 50.0 37 37 37481.8 676.6 674.0 109.0 715.7 343.8 584.9 372.6 774.7 503.9
18.35 25.78 25.68 4.15 27.27 13.10 22.28 14.19 29.51 19.20 14.12 19.83 19.75 3.19 20.97 10.07 17.14 10.92 22.70 14.77
32% 46% 46% 7% 44% 21% 36% 23% 47% 31%
% Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing % Passing100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%99% 100% 99% 100% 99% 99% 99% 100% 100% 98%96% 99% 95% 98% 94% 93% 96% 100% 97% 92%76% 90% 78% 84% 73% 70% 77% 94% 86% 74%33% 64% 34% 32% 27% 31% 34% 64% 52% 37%2% 26% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 12% 8% 5%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
2
Detailed Summary of Gradation Measurements
Sample SiteSample EventSample ID #
Sample LocationDate
Station LimitStation Limit
Flow Rate (cfs)Sample Weight (grams)
Bed Load Calc. (tons per day)Bed Load Calc. (cy per day) 1.3
% of Total
Unified Class U.S. Sieve mmCobbles 6" Cobbles 152.4Cobbles 3" Cobbles 76.2
Coarse Gravel 2" Coarse Gravel 50Coarse Gravel 1‐1/2" Coarse Gravel 38.1Coarse Gravel 1" Coarse Gravel 25Coarse Gravel 3/4" Coarse Gravel 19Fine Gravel 1/2" Fine Gravel 12.5Fine Gravel 3/8" Fine Gravel 9.5Coarse Sand No.4 Coarse Sand 4.75Coarse Sand No.8 Coarse Sand 2.36Medium Sand No.16 Med Sand 1.18Medium Sand No.30 Med Sand 0.6Fine Sand No.50 Fine Sand 0.3Fine Sand No.100 Fine Sand 0.15Fine Sand No.200 Fine Sand 0.075
Silt Silt 0.036Silt Silt 0.023Silt Silt 0.013Silt Silt 0.009Silt Silt 0.007Clay Clay 0.005Clay Clay 0.003Clay Clay 0.001
Control Site Control Site Control SitePost Project 3 Post Project 3 Post Project 3
22 23 24Left 1/3 Center 1/3 Right 1/3
4/29/2019 4/29/2019 4/29/201912 34 6032 58 8037.1 37.1 37.1619.9 356.8 429
23.62 13.59 16.34 18.17 10.46 12.57
44% 25% 31%
% Passing % Passing % Passing100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%99% 99% 99%92% 93% 94%58% 67% 69%9% 18% 16%0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0%
3
Attachment C
Attachment D
FINAL DESIGN PLANS FOR
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY
Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protectionand
Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
Riverside, CA
May 2018
Vicinity MapNOT TO SCALE
Corona
Norco
Riverside
Jurupa Valley Van Buren Blvd.
Limonite Ave.
Jurupa Ave.
Van Buren Blvd.
Location MapNOT TO SCALE
Cover Sheet G
Project Location Project Location
Sheet
Scheevel EngineeringP.O. Box 28745Anaheim, CA 92809Phone: (714) 470-9045 Email: [email protected]
SAWPASanta Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and
Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
Sheet No.
01
Sheet No.
01
Final Design
Designed
Revised
ByNS 7/15/2017NS 10/23/2017
Date
Drawn NS May 9, 2018 9of
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority11615 Sterling AvenueRiverside, CA 92503Phone: (951) 354-4220 Website: www.SAWPA.org
NS 5/9/2018 1
GProject Notes
Special Construction Notes
1) By accepting award of the contract, the contractor acknowledges and agrees to the risk to materials, equipment and personnel associated with working in an active river and flood plain.
2) The contractor will be solely responsible for all contractor materials, equipment and personnel at the jobsite for the duration of the project.
3) The contractor will be responsible for the design, construction and maintenance of any and all temporary berms, dewatering and other flow management techniques. The samples provided in this drawing set are for illustrative purposes only. Techniques, material and equipment used to control flow will be subject to approval by the owner. However, owner review and approval does in no way transfer liability, cost or risk to the owner.
4) Flows in the Santa Ana River will fluctuate during construction.5) Rock materials imported for the project will be supplied by San Bernardino Valley
Municipal Water District. The rock material is located at Source Material Site 1 (34°4'52.70"N and 117°7'53.52"W) and the boulders at Source Material Site 2 (34°6'4.52"N and 117°7'7.97"W) and all costs to sort, load and transport the material to the jobsite will be the responsibility of the contractor.
6) The project will result in a zero net volume increase at the project site. Each cubic yard of material imported will be offset by exporting the equivalent volume of material off site. The contractor will assume responsibility for all costs associated with the zero net volume increase. The location and type of material exported from the site will be approved by the owner.
7) Any and all areas disturbed by the contractor will be left in as-good or better condition at the end of the project. The contractor will provide pre-construction videos and photographs of the site prior to starting any work. The contractor will also provide post-construction video and photos prior to final demobilization. All topography and grades will be restored to the pre-project condition unless otherwise approved by the owner.
8) Work hours will be Monday through Friday between the hours of 7:00 am to 5:00 pm. No work will be allowed on weekends or SAWPA observed holidays.
9) The contractor will be required to move personnel, equipment and materials out of the river channel and river overbank areas prior to a storm event or when flows are expected to exceed controls put in-place by the contractor.
Coordination Requirements
1) Biological monitoring will be provided by the owner. The contractor will provide a minimum of 5 working days written notice to the owner for scheduling the biological monitor.
2) All work areas must be inspected and cleared EACH DAY by the biological monitor prior to starting any work.
3) The contractor will be responsible for coordinating with the City of Jurupa Valley (and or Riverside) and will be responsible for all costs associated with abiding by all City of Jurupa Valley (and or Riverside) requirements.
General Notes
1) ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS/PLANS, AND THE LATEST EDITION OF STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A COPY OF THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES.
3) A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE OWNER AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD PRIOR TO START OF WORK. THE OWNER or OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST FIVE (5) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED OBSERVATION. CONSTRUCTION WORK AT THE SANTA ANA RIVER SITE WILL BEGIN ON OR AFTER SEPTEMBER 15, 2018.
4) THE CONTRACTOR PERFORMING WORK ON THIS PROJECT SHALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THIS SITE AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES RESULTING FROM HIS OPERATIONS.
5) ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER. BEDDING AND BACKFILL MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE DENSITY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICES ALERT (DIG ALERT) BY DIALING 811 A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION.
7) THESE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SHALL NEITHER BE ALTERED NOR REUSED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE.
8) CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE WORK AREA IN A NEAT, SAFE, CLEAN AND SANITARY CONDITION AT ALL TIMES AND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. STREETS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN OF DEBRIS, WITH DUST AND OTHER NUISANCE BEING CONTROLLED AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL CLEAN-UP ON ADJACENT STREETS AFFECTED BY HIS CONSTRUCTION.
9) ALL APPROACHES TO PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS, DRIVEWAYS AND INTERSECTING STREETS SHALL BE KEPT OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. CONTRACTOR SHALL GAIN PRIOR APPROVAL FROM PROJECT OWNER AND INFORM ALL PROPERTY OWNERS OR BUSINESSES A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT HOURS PRIOR TO
PERFORMING ANY CONSTRUCTION WHICH WILL IMPEDE THE NORMAL ACCESS TO THEIR PROPERTY OR BUSINESS.
10) THE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE ACTUAL LOCATION AND ELEVATION IN THE FIELD (POTHOLE) OF ALL UTILITIES IN CONFLICT.
11) ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS MAY VARY FROM THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ACTUAL ABOVE GROUND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF BID.
12) CONSTRUCTION SITES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN SUCH A CONDITION THAT ANY STORM DOES NOT CARRY WASTES OR POLLUTANTS OUT OF WORK AREAS OR OFF THE SITE.
13) SUCH "DISCHARGES" OF MATERIAL OTHER THAN STORMWATER ARE ALLOWED ONLY WHEN NECESSARY FOR PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES AND WHERE THEY DO NOT: CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO A VIOLATION OF ANY WATER QUALITY STANDARD; CAUSE OR THREATEN TO CAUSE POLLUTION, CONTAMINATION, OR NUISANCE; OR CONTAIN A HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE IN A QUANTITY REPORTABLE UNDER FEDERAL REGULATION S40CFR PARTS 117 AND 302.
a. MATERIALS WHICH MAY HAVE EFFECTS OF POLLUTION INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: SOLID OR LIQUID CHEMICAL SPILLS; WASTES FROM PAINTS, STAINS, SEALANTS, HYDRAULIC, RADIATOR OR BATTERY FLUIDS; FERTILIZERS, VEHICLE EQUIPMENT WASH WATER AND CONCRETE WASH WATER; CONCRETE DETERGENT OR FLOATABLE WASTES; WASTES FROM ANY ENGINE EQUIPMENT STEAM CLEANING OR CHEMICAL DEGREASING, AND SUPER CHLORINATED WATER LINE FLUSHINGS.
b. DURING CONSTRUCTION, DISPOSAL OF SUCH MATERIALS SHOULD OCCUR IN A SPECIFIED AND CONTROLLED TEMPORARY AREA ON SITE PHYSICALLY SEPARATED FROM POTENTIAL STORMWATER RUN-OFF, WITH ULTIMATE DISPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.
14) CONTRACTOR SHALL USE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S). SAND BAGS AND FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED OVER ANY STORM DRAINS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PROJECT SITE. SILT FENCE WILL BE PLACED TO CONTROL ALL SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE AS NEEDED OR DIRECTED BY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER.
15) THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MEETING ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, MITIGATION MEASURES AND BMPs IDENTIFIED IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.
16) THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING AND PAYING FOR ANY AND ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL PERMITS AND HAUL PERMITS TO COMPLETE THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR WILL UTILIZE CITY AND COUNTY APPROVED HAUL ROUTES TO PERFORM THE WORK.
Sheet
Scheevel EngineeringP.O. Box 28745Anaheim, CA 92809Phone: (714) 470-9045 Email: [email protected]
SAWPASanta Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and
Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
Sheet No.
02
Sheet No.
02
Final Design
Designed
Revised
ByNS 7/15/2017NS 10/23/2017
Date
Drawn NS May 9, 2018 9of
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority11615 Sterling AvenueRiverside, CA 92503Phone: (951) 354-4220 Website: www.SAWPA.org
NS 5/9/2018 2
GSheet Index, Symbols & Contacts
Sheet Index
G-01 Cover SheetG-02 Project NotesG-03 Sheet Index, Symbols & ContactsC-04 Site PlanC-05 Sub-Grade ViewsC-06 Isometric ViewsC-07 Plan ViewC-08 Section ViewsC-09 Restoration Plan
Standard Symbols
Detail NumberDetail Sheet Number
Native Sand
Cut Faces
Gradation 1
Gradation 2
Gradation 3
Rip Rap or Gradation 3
# #-#
Contact Index
SAWPA (951) 354 - 4233Scheevel Engineering (714) 470 - 9045Biological Monitor (951) 757 - 0782Dig Alert 811
Abbreviations
ft feetin incheslbs poundsoz ouncespsi pounds per square inchsq yd square yardsq ft square footOC on centerOCEW on center each wayEF each face
Gradation Specifications
1. Gradation 1
Sieve Size Percent Finer by Weight
6 in 100 3 in 40 to 551/4 in 10 to 20
No. 200 0 to 5
2. Gradation 2
Sieve Size Percent Finer by Weight
6 in 100 3 in 40 to 55 1 in 10 to 20
No. 200 0 to 5
3. Gradation 3
Sieve Size Percent Finer by Weight
2 foot 100 1-foot 40 to 55 6-in 5 to 10No. 200 0 to 3
Sheet
Scheevel EngineeringP.O. Box 28745Anaheim, CA 92809Phone: (714) 470-9045 Email: [email protected]
SAWPASanta Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and
Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
Sheet No.
03
Sheet No.
03
Final Design
Designed
Revised
ByNS 7/15/2017NS 10/23/2017
Date
Drawn NS May 9, 2018 9of
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority11615 Sterling AvenueRiverside, CA 92503Phone: (951) 354-4220 Website: www.SAWPA.org
NS 5/9/2018 3
CSite Plan
Overall Site ViewNot To Scale
AC-04
Work Area Plan ViewNot To Scale
BC-04
B C 04
In-Channel Work Area
Staging Area
Access Road
Fill Area
Borrow Area
Fill, Water & Wheel Roll Compact Grade Transition So That Driving Surface Slope is
Less Than 10% or So That Contractors Trucks Can Safely
Navigate The Slope. Fill Material Will Be Taken from
Access Road Surface or Borrow Area. Contractor to Provide 50 CY of Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB) to Improve the Access
Road Surface As Needed.
Trim, Clear and Grub 25' Corridor for Access Road. Re-grade Surface. Dust Control:
Keep Watered & Compacted During Project to Prevent Fugitive Dust, Water As Needed
To Control Dust
Borrow Area (0.10 acres)
Access Road (0.58 acres)
Staging Area - Clear & Grub
(0.17 acres)
In-Channel Work Area (0.10 acres)
Partially Submerged Groin
Boulder or Boulder Cluster
G C 07
Clearing & Grubbing Note #2:5 Select Branches Will Be Trimmed and Saved For Use In The Habitat Feature. The Contractor Will Perform This Work
Under The Direction of the Owner. All Other Vegetation Will Be Removed and Disposed of By The Contractor
Locked access gate. Contractor to bring a lock with a thick shackle to the pre-construction conference so it can be added to the gate.
Riparian Habitat Removal (0.30 acres) To Be Staked/Flagged In Field By Owner
Any and all movement outside of the areas highlighted on these plans or any areas flagged or fenced in the field is strictly prohibited. Absolutely no traffic of any kind and no storage or staging of materials will be allowed outside of the areas highlighted on these plans or any areas flagged or fenced in the field. Any damage or disturbance of grounds,
vegetation or any other features outside of the areas highlighted on these plans or any areas flagged or fenced in the field will be repaired, replaced and maintained for as long as is required to fully restore the areas to as-good or better condition. Additional fees and fines may also apply and the contractor will be solely responsible for any and all costs.
Clearing & Grubbing Note #1:Vegetation growth will occur, and biomass export volume will increase, between bid time and construction. Contractor will assume that the removal and export volume of the biomass will be double (2X) of that observed during bid phase
and include pricing /costs in their bid for the increased clearing, grubbing and export.
Final Location to be Selected and Staked
by the Owner Prior to Construction
Sheet
Scheevel EngineeringP.O. Box 28745Anaheim, CA 92809Phone: (714) 470-9045 Email: [email protected]
SAWPASanta Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and
Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
Sheet No.
04
Sheet No.
04
Final Design
Designed
Revised
ByNS 7/15/2017NS 10/23/2017
Date
Drawn NS May 9, 2018 9of
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority11615 Sterling AvenueRiverside, CA 92503Phone: (951) 354-4220 Website: www.SAWPA.org
NS 5/9/2018 4
CSub-Grade Views
Subgrade View(Looking Upstream)
CC-05
Subgrade ViewLooking North
DC-05
Temporary Berm2' High Min
Existing River Bed Invert
Bottom of Subgrade Excavation 3' Below Existing
River Bed Invert
8'-0"
20'-0"
Final Berm Design By Contractor
Final ExcavationDesign By Contractor
3' Varies 5' to 7'
2'-0"
2'-0"
Groin Subgrade Base2' Thick (Rip Rap or Gradation 3)
Boulder Cluster Subgrade Base2' Thick (Rip Rap or Gradation 3)
Subgrade Rip Rap May Be PlacedIn Partially Wet Condition
(Standing Water)
Approx. Top of Slope Line
3' -0"
Scheevel Engineering Will Layout Structures and Provide Reference Staking 2 Times During Project
25'-9 7/8"19'-3 1/2"
60°
Top of Slope To Be Staked By Scheevel EngineeringAfter Clearing & Grubbing
De-Watering Pump As Needed
9'-0"
Sheet
Scheevel EngineeringP.O. Box 28745Anaheim, CA 92809Phone: (714) 470-9045 Email: [email protected]
SAWPASanta Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and
Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
Sheet No.
05
Sheet No.
05
Final Design
Designed
Revised
ByNS 7/15/2017NS 10/23/2017
Date
Drawn NS May 9, 2018 9of
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority11615 Sterling AvenueRiverside, CA 92503Phone: (951) 354-4220 Website: www.SAWPA.org
NS 5/9/2018 5
CIsometric Views
Boulder ViewNot To Scale
EC-06
Isometric ViewNot To Scale
FC-06
7' Dia Boulder
5'-6' Dia Boulder
5'-6' Dia Boulder
4' Dia Boulder
Main Apron - Gradation 1
Tapered Apron - Gradation 2
Structure - Gradation 3
Toe of Slope - Gradation 3
Tapered Apron - Gradation 2
L C 09
Flowing Water Will Be Present, Not Shown Here For Clarity
Flowing Water Will Be Present, Not Shown Here For Clarity
Vegetation pictured here to be planted by owner after construction is complete. Contractor to clear and grub existing vegetation to provide clear working area.
Vegetation pictured here to be planted by owner after construction is complete. Contractor to clear and grub existing vegetation to provide clear working area.
Sheet
Scheevel EngineeringP.O. Box 28745Anaheim, CA 92809Phone: (714) 470-9045 Email: [email protected]
SAWPASanta Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and
Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
Sheet No.
06
Sheet No.
06
Final Design
Designed
Revised
ByNS 7/15/2017NS 10/23/2017
Date
Drawn NS May 9, 2018 9of
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority11615 Sterling AvenueRiverside, CA 92503Phone: (951) 354-4220 Website: www.SAWPA.org
NS 5/9/2018 6
CPlan View
Plan ViewNot To Scale
GC-07
Top of Slope
H
C 08
I
C 08
JC 08
3'-0"
Existing Santa Ana River Invert
Flow Direction
Varies 12' to 15'
42' -0" + -
Flowing Water Will Be Present, Not Shown Here For Clarity
Up To 5 Branches Placed As DirectedEach Branch 4" to 10" in Diameter and up To 10' Long
4' Dia Boulder
Gradation 1
Gradation 2
Gradation 2
Gradation 3
Sheet
Scheevel EngineeringP.O. Box 28745Anaheim, CA 92809Phone: (714) 470-9045 Email: [email protected]
SAWPASanta Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and
Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
Sheet No.
07
Sheet No.
07
Final Design
Designed
Revised
ByNS 7/15/2017NS 10/23/2017
Date
Drawn NS May 9, 2018 9of
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority11615 Sterling AvenueRiverside, CA 92503Phone: (951) 354-4220 Website: www.SAWPA.org
NS 5/9/2018 7
CSection Views
Boulder SectionNot To Scale
JC-08
NOT USEDNot To Scale
KC-08
Partially Submerged GabionNot To Scale
HC-08
Boulder & Gabion SectionNot To Scale
IC-08
2'-0"
1'-0"
4'-0"
18'-0"
3'-0"
20'-0"
1'-0"
3'-0"
1-6"
8'-0"
Rip Rap or Gradation 3
Gradation 3 Gradation 2
1'-6"
1'-6""1'-0"
4'-0" 9'-0" 4'-0"
Gradation 3Gradation 2
Rip Rap or Gradation 3
7' Dia Boulder
Gradation 2
1'-0"
7'-0"
2'-0"
5'-0" 17'-0" 5'-0" 15'-0"
42'-0"
5'-0"
8'-0"9'-0"
1'-0"
Varies
6'-0" 6'-0"
2'-0" 2'-0"
6"
6'-0" 4'-0" 6'-0"
Rip Rap or Gradation 3
Gradation 3
Gradation 1
Gradation 1
Gradation 2
7'
Elevation 99.40'
Elevation 95.30'
Elevation 95.40'
Approx. Existing Grade
Avg. Water Surface Elevation
Avg. Water Surface Elevation
Avg. Water Surface Elevation
4'
4' Diameter Boulder
Flow Direction
Note: All elevations based off temporary field benchmark with reference elevation in feet (not a true elevation) set at 100.00'. Scheevel Engineering
to provide benchmark in field at time of construction.
Elevation 95.20' Elevation 95.50'
Gradation 2
Sheet
Scheevel EngineeringP.O. Box 28745Anaheim, CA 92809Phone: (714) 470-9045 Email: [email protected]
SAWPASanta Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and
Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
Sheet No.
08
Sheet No.
08
Final Design
Designed
Revised
ByNS 7/15/2017NS 10/23/2017
Date
Drawn NS May 9, 2018 9of
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority11615 Sterling AvenueRiverside, CA 92503Phone: (951) 354-4220 Website: www.SAWPA.org
NS 5/9/2018 8
CRestoration Plan
Re-Plant Riparian Vegetation (By Owner)
Re-Grade Invert To Flush With Top of Habitat Aprons(By Contractor)
Re-Grade Disturbed Slopes (By Contractor)
Re-Plant Riparian Vegetation (By Owner)
Re-Grade Borrow Area To Match Existing Grade (By Contractor)
Re-Grade & Smooth Access Road As Very Last Action (By Contractor)
Restoration PlanNot To Scale
LC-09
Re-Grade Staging Area To Match Existing Grade (By Contractor)
All Plantings Supplied & Installed By Owner
Re-Grade Disturbed Slopes (By Contractor)
Re-Plant Riparian Vegetation (By Owner)
Sheet
Scheevel EngineeringP.O. Box 28745Anaheim, CA 92809Phone: (714) 470-9045 Email: [email protected]
SAWPASanta Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and
Beneficial Use Enhancement Project
Sheet No.
09
Sheet No.
09
Final Design
Designed
Revised
ByNS 7/15/2017NS 10/23/2017
Date
Drawn NS May 9, 2018 9of
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority11615 Sterling AvenueRiverside, CA 92503Phone: (951) 354-4220 Website: www.SAWPA.org
NS 5/9/2018 9
Attachment E
7/31/2019
1
Project Site: Pre-Project –06/26/2018
Project Site: Pre-Project –9/19/2018
1
2
7/31/2019
2
Post-Project – 10/15/2018
Flow
Post-Project – 10/24/2018
3
4
7/31/2019
3
Post-Project – 10/24/2018
Flow
Post-Project – 11/30/2018
Flow
5
6
7/31/2019
4
Post-Project – 12/12/2018
Flow
Post-Project – 2/1/2019
Flow
7
8
7/31/2019
5
Post-Project – 4/29/2019
9