final hiv/aids programme evaluation 2008-2012
DESCRIPTION
Partner Platform Meeting DCA/CA Joint HIV/AIDS Program. FINAL HIV/AIDS PROGRAMME EVALUATION 2008-2012. May 17, 2012 Phnom Penh Ecumenical Diakonia Centre. Contents. Country Context Programme Overview Objectives of evaluation Methodologies Limitations Findings - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
KEM LEY | Principal investigatorNHIM DALEN |Consultant
FINAL HIV/AIDS PROGRAMME
EVALUATION
2008-2012
Partner Platform Meeting
DCA/CA Joint HIV/AIDS Program
May 17, 2012Phnom Penh Ecumenical Diakonia Centre
2
Contents
I. Country Context
II. Programme Overview
III. Objectives of evaluation
IV. Methodologies
V. Limitations
VI. Findings
VII. Conclusions and Discussions
VIII. Recommendations
IX. References
X. Annexes
I. Country Context
3
<5 yrs5 - 9 yrs
10 - 14 yrs15 - 19 yrs20 - 24 yrs25 - 29 yrs30 - 34 yrs35 - 39 yrs40 - 44 yrs45 - 49 yrs50 - 54 yrs55 - 59 yrs60 - 64 yrs65 - 69 yrs70 - 74 yrs75 - 79 yrs
>80
8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00
5.35.6
6.46.2
5.04.5
2.53.1
2.62.2
1.51.20.90.70.50.30.3
5.05.4
6.15.9
5.24.7
2.73.3
2.92.7
2.21.7
1.20.9
0.70.50.4
Age Pyramid
Female
Male
Total # of HH =2,842,897 Total population =13,395,682 Male Population =6,516,054 Female Population =6,879,628 Urban Population =2,614,027 Rural Population =10,781,655
Elderly >64 : 4.27 % or 571,996 M
Population 31-64: 29.34% or 3.93 M
Youth 15-30: 32.73% or 4.38 M Children <18 : 5,487,708 or 41%
Children <15 : 33.71% or 4.51 M
Sources: Census 2008 National Youth Policy 2011
I. Country Context
4
Cambodia Population # or % References
Cambodia Youth 15-24, UN 2,989,916 or 22.32% Census 2008
Cambodia Youth 15-30, NYP
4,384,407 or 32.73%
Census 2008
Young Population 10-24, UN 4,660,358 or 34.79% Census 2008
Cambodia Children <18, UN 5,489,550 or 40.98% Census 2008
Total # of Female EWs 34,193 NCHADS 2009
Total # of MSM in 10 provinces
21,327 KHANA/FHI 09
Total # of DU/IDU (DU=2,000)
15,000 NCHADS/NAA 2010
Total # of OVC 750,000 or 14% ADB, July 2011
Total # of CIA and CAA 85,921 UNDP/SI, 2010
Total Active PLHIV on ART 42,799 or 96.7% NCHADS, 2011
I. Country Context
5
Core Indicators NCHADS 2010
NCHADS 2011
HIV Prevalence Rate 15-49 0.7% 0.8%
Family Health Clinics-STI 60 61
Total VCCT 246 255
OI/ART Services 51 57
Total active patient on ART 42,799 or 96.7%
46,473
Total active child patients on ART 4,102 4,439.0
Total number of HBC Team 356 354
Total number of HC covered by HBCT 848 881
Total number of PLHIV supported by HBCT 31,127 32,080
# of OD with at least one Centre that provide PMTCT services 67 (87%) 68 (88.3%)
% of PW who were tested for HIV and received their test result
71.2% 84.9%
% of adults still alive after 12 months after ART initiation 86.4% 92.6%
% of people tested for HIV who received their result through (Post TC)
99.50% 99%
I. Country Context
6
Description of Children under 18 # or % References
Total children under 18 41% -5,487.708 Census 2008
Orphans and Vulnerable Children 14%-750,000 ADB 2011
Children infected and affected by HIV 85,921 (UNDP) UNDP SEI 2010
Orphans (Double or Single ) 73,090 or 10 % CDB 2009
AIDS Orphans 51,000 CDB 2009
Estimated child infected by AIDS 6,000 NAA 2006
Victim of Sexual Abuse 331 CDB 2009
Victims of Trafficking 68 CDB 2009
Disable Children 6,882 CDB 2009
Child involvement in economic activities 45% or 1.5m CMDG 2010
Child Labor (16.72%) in 2001 250,000 CMDG 2010
Children under 5 –Anemia 55% CDHS 2010
Stunted (Under 5) 40% CDHS 2010
Underweight 28% CDHS 2010
I. Country Context
7
200 2005 2010 2015(CMDG)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
437472
206
250
32 4471
10 2254
Trends in Maternal Mortality Ratio and Delivery
Maternal Motality Ratio per 100,000 live birthBirths attended by skilled health personnel (% of expected pregnancies)Delivery at health facilities
I. Country Context
8
2008 2009 2010 2011 -
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
58.0 63.0
69.2 71.7 72
39.0 44.0
52.1
61.9 60
85.0 83.0
72.0
86.2 85
Antenatal Care 2 Covarage and Birth Delivery
Birth delivery assisted by health peronnel Target 2011 Birth delivery at health facility
Target 2011 Antenetal Care 2 Target 2011
I. Country Context
9
2008 2009 2010 2011 -
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
26.0 28.0
30.0 29.1
33
Contraceptive Prevalance Rate
% of Married women cur-rently using modern con-traceptive method (public facility)Target 2011
I. Country Context
102008 2009 2010 2011
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2732.2
57.360.6
% of Pregnant Women on ART
2008 2009 2010 2011 -
5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000
28,932 33,677
37,666 42,034
3,067 3,638 4,102 4,439
Number of Active HIV/AIDS Patients on ART
AdultChildren
I. Country Context
11
Cross cutting Strategies
S4. Effective Leadership and Management
S5. Supportive legal and policy environment
S6. Use of strategic information
S7. Cost-effective resource allocation
I. Country Context
12
UN Political Declaration on HIV and
AIDS
Zero New Infection
Zero Discriminati
onZero Death
EW-80-90%MSM-95%IDU-60%
High treatment coverage-98% ART
Social Protection for PLHIV a& OVC
Comprehensive Boosted Continuum
of Prevention to Care and Treatment-CoPCT
for MARPs
Social Protection for PLHIV, OVC and
Other Vulnerable and Poor Population
II. DCA Programme Overview
13
The DCA/CA HIV & AIDS Programme
Sexual Health and Life Skills for young people in Cambodia 2008-2012
The Overall Programme Goal
The overall programme goal is that supportive environment created for vulnerable and hard to reach young people to protect themselves and others from HIV infection and to mitigate the social and economic impact of AIDS
Specific Objectives
Objective 1. Vulnerable youth empowered to claim their HIV and SRH rights in order to have full control over their sexual and reproductive health and to minimize risk behaviour for HIV infection.
Objective 2. Social, physical and economic vulnerability of vulnerable youth reduced (especially street based youth, orphans and vulnerable adolescents, and HIV positive youth).
Objective 3. Legal and moral duty bearers strengthened to promote and enforce youth and gender friendly HIV, SRH and gender policies and laws.
Objective 4. Cooperation between partners and wider networks enables shared learning, improved effectiveness, wider coverage and replication of interventions.
Partners KYA, GAD/C, LWD, MS, MC-LF, K&S, CCW, CSSD, CHEMS, HACC & SCC10 Partners and one Associated Partner (SCC)
Target Groups Young People
II. DCA Programme OverviewMid-Term Review March 2010, Challenges found
Gender equality and rights based approach remained a big challenge to many partners
Some partners addressed populations at large or specific community groups without adding a youth perspective
Limited synergy between the programme and the other DCA/CA programmes (Food Security, GBV Political Space)
Few joint activities in the programme platform.
14
II. DCA Programme OverviewMid-Term Review March 2010, 6 Recommendations;
1) Target Group: Hard to reach youth
2) Programme Platform -Advocacy Platform for policy change, NSPIII…Rights based
3) Indicators under Objective3: Joint Advocacy Issues-Advocacy Agenda
4) Economic Empowerment –PLHIV…
5) Sharing of Resources-IEC, Best Practices
6) M&E System Strengtening-Systematic monitoring of outcomes-KAPB of Youth
15
III. Objectives of Evaluation
The purpose of the final evaluation is to measure the achievements of the programme against its objectives, then make recommendations for mainstreaming HIV and AIDS into other programmes.
To assess the progress against the programme objectives and indicators.
To evaluate the relevance, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of the HIV and AIDS Programme.
To identify and analyse the strength and the weakness of the programme
Make recommendations for HIV and AIDS mainstreaming into other DCA/CA programmes if relevant and for enhancing the sustainability of the programme achievements
16
IV. Methodologies
17
Desk Review
Evaluation Workshop
Key Informants
(KII)Focus Group Discussion
(FGD)
IV. Methodologies
18
Timeline
Document Collection
Overall agreement between
Consultant and DCA
Evaluation Tools development and contract
sign& Desk Study
2 May 2012
Contract Sign Data Collection Tools Approval
Field Work Preparation
Confirmation with KII and FGD
Preliminary findings
consultation
Desk Study and Field Work Final Report Submission
Evaluation Workshop
2-23 –May 2012
17 May 2012
4 June 15 Jun 2012
Group Discussions
4 Group Discussion
Unstructured Questionnaires
Duration: 60 minutes
Presentation & QA : 20 Minutes for each
Presenter
Reporter
Minute Taker 19
Group Discussions
Group1-Objective1: Vulnerable youth empowered to claim their HIV and
SRH rights in order to have full control over their sexual and reproductive
health and to minimize risk behaviour for HIV infection.
Group2-Objective 2: Social, physical and economic vulnerability of
vulnerable youth reduced (especially street based youth, orphans and
vulnerable adolescents, and HIV positive youth).
Group3- Objective 3: Legal and moral duty bearers strengthened to
promote and enforce youth and gender friendly HIV, SRH and gender policies
and laws.
Group4-Objective 4: Cooperation between partners and wider networks
enables shared learning, improved effectiveness, wider coverage and
replication of interventions.
20
Best Practice Development
21
Project Title Executive Summary
Brief Description of the
project or approach
Policy
Mechanisms
Capacity Building
What makes it best practice
Best Practice Development
22
How it score on the criteriaCriteria Score ( High, Medium or Low)
Relevant High Why?
Proven to be success
Substantial in scale
Innovative/Participatory/Inclusive in approach
Efficiency
Replicable
Validated
Sustainable