final assignment · 2012-07-09 · final assignment sergii bobliakh pr4s100 ukraine . promitheas-4:...
TRANSCRIPT
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
PROMITHEAS – 4 Training Procedure
E – class
Final Assignment
Sergii BOBLIAKH
pr4s100
Ukraine
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents __________________________________________________ 2
DECLARATION ON PLAGIARISM AND COLLUSION __________________ 3
Chapter 1 _________________________________________________________ 4
Present a Climate Change policy instrument of your country. __________________ 4
Chapter 2 _________________________________________________________ 7
Present the data that need to be collected for the policy instrument selected in
Chapter 1 _____________________________________________________________ 7
Chapter 3 ________________________________________________________ 10
Describe the Business-As-Usual scenario, according to the selected policy
instrument in Chapter 1. ________________________________________________ 10
Chapter 4 ________________________________________________________ 13
Evaluate the policy instrument that you chose on Chapter 1. __________________ 13
References _______________________________________________________ 17
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
3
DECLARATION ON PLAGIARISM AND COLLUSION
This form should be completed by the student and appended to any piece of work that is
submitted for summative assessment. The following defines plagiarism:
“Plagiarism” occurs when a student misrepresents, as his/her own work, the work, written
or otherwise, of any other person (including another student) or of any institution.
Examples of forms of plagiarism include:
the verbatim (word for word) copying of another’s work without appropriate and
correctly presented acknowledgement;
the close paraphrasing of another’s work by simply changing a few words or
altering the order of presentation, without appropriate and correctly presented
acknowledgement;
unacknowledged quotation of phrases from another’s work;
the deliberate and detailed presentation of another’s concept as one’s own”.
“Another’s work” covers all material, including, for example, written work,
diagrams, designs, charts, musical compositions and pictures, from all sources,
including, for example, the internet, journals, textbooks and essays. The following
defines collusion:
“Collusion” occurs when, unless with official approval (e.g. in the case of group projects),
two or more students consciously collaborate in the preparation and production of work
which is ultimately submitted by each in an identical, or substantially similar, form and/or
is represented by each to be the product of his or her individual efforts.
“Collusion” also occurs where there is unauthorized co-operation between a student and
another person in the preparation and production of work which is presented as the
student’s own.
STUDENT DECLARATION
I confirm that I have read and understood the above definitions of plagiarism and collusion.
I confirm that I have not committed plagiarism when completing the attached piece of
work, nor have I colluded with any other student in the preparation and production of this
work.
Sergii Bobliakh
June 30, 2012
Ukraine
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
4
Chapter 1
Present a Climate Change policy instrument of your country.
Module 1
Instructor: Prof. Dimitrios Mavrakis
Mark: __/10
The issue of climate change is not local but global. That is why every country in the
world must not be pessimistic to that problem and take some action to tackle it. In last
decades climate change became more obvious worldwide in a form of extremely high
temperatures in some parts of our planet, and in forms of very severe winters in others. By
taking some actions, different countries, organizations and parties start doing some
contribution to solve this problem. In this way we got different treaties, documents and
protocols which are asking to decrease emission of greenhouse gases (main contributors to
climate change and global warming).
Ukraine, as a new independent state, after collapse of USSR, became involved in
climate change issues. The main reason for that is because Ukraine belongs to high energy
intensity countries. Also, Ukraine is in top 20 CO2 emitters.
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UN FCCC) is the first
and major international legal instrument to address climate change issues at a global scale.
Ukraine signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate change in June
1992. Ukrainian Parliament ratified it in October 1996 and from August 1997 Ukraine
became the Party.
Kyoto Protocol was signed on March 15, 1999 in NY City and it was ratified by
Ukrainian Parliament on February 4, 2004. After time than Protocol came to force in 2005,
Ukraine became a Party to it. To stimulate a reduction of greenhouse gases, the Kyoto
Protocol offers relevant for Ukraine flexible mechanisms such as joint implementations
projects (JI) (Article 6 of KP) and emissions trading (article 17 of KP).
Examples of JI projects in Ukraine: the installation of a new waste heat recovery system
at the Alchevsk Coke Plant (with an estimated emission reduction of 11.0 million t CO2 eq
for the period 2008–2012) and the “Reduction of natural gas emissions at OJSC ‘Odesagas’
gate stations and gas distribution networks” project (with an estimated emission reduction
of 1.9 million t CO2 eq for the period 2008–2012). The majority of JI projects are supported
by European Union countries (including Germany, Ireland, Denmark, Netherlands and
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) and the remaining projects are
supported by Japan and Switzerland.
Ministry of Environmental Protection of Ukraine responsible for development and
implementation Climate Change Policy in Ukraine and implementation of UN FCCC and
Kyoto Protocol according the Decree of the Ukrainian Government.
According to the Kyoto Protocol, during 2008…2012 period, total greenhouse gas
emissions in Ukraine should not exceed the level of 1990.
Energy intensity in Ukraine is very high, that is why it is the main priority of the
government to increase energy efficiency. As part of the Copenhagen Accord, Ukraine
committed to ensuring that emissions remain 20% below 1990 levels in 2020 [1].
The national policy of Ukraine includes the following legal framework as mitigation
policy instruments:
- Law for the establishment of “Green” tariff (feed-in-tariff).
- Law that offers tax incentives for energy efficiency and renewable energy
investment.
- “Law on energy conservation” was adopted by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on
July 1, 1994.
- Law on alternative sources of energy.
- Ukraine’s Energy Strategy for the Period Until 2030, adopted in March 2006 [2].
- Program on state support of development of non-traditional and renewable energy
sources [3].
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
5
At present time, in Ukraine there is no national adaptation policies adopted.
In my answer I chose feed-in-tariff policy instrument, which can be a powerful
instrument to promote renewable energy power generation and to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions . Frankly speaking, this policy instrument was one of the basic mitigation’s steps
in Ukraine.
To attract more money in renewable energy, Ukrainian government introduced in
September 25, 2008 the law 'On feed-in tariff'. “A feed-in-tariff is a policy mechanism
designed to accelerate investment in renewable energy technologies. It achieves this by
offering long-term contracts to renewable energy producers, typically based on the cost of
generation of each technology” [4].
The goal of feed-in-tariff is to offer cost-based compensation to renewable energy
producers, providing the price certainty and long-term contracts that help finance
renewable energy investments.
In Ukraine not all sources of green energy production can receive feed-in-tariff, but
some are eligible. They are: solar energy, wind energy, hydro energy (only small
hydropower plants with the generation capacity not exceeding 10 MW). The feed-in-tariffs
for renewable power producers in Ukraine are set by the national regulator. As of January
5, 2012 the following tariffs per kWh were applied: biomass – UAH 1.3446 (EUR 0.13),
wind – UAH 1.23 (EUR 0.12), small hydro – UAH 0.8418 (EUR 0.08), solar - UAH
5.0509 (EUR 0.46) [5]. In case of significant fluctuations of the national currency against
Euro the feed-in-tariffs are adjusted to reflect the changes. Feed-in-tariff ensures that those who produce electricity from renewable energy sources
have a guaranteed return of their investments. This policy instrument has proven to be very
adaptable and effective in developed and developing countries. Also, feed-in-tariff become
the policy instrument of choice for so many countries in the world, because it is already
proven to promote electric power at the lowest cost. Unlike research and development
subsidies or tax credits, feed-in-tariff is usually funded by customers, as part of their bill.
Today, feed-in-tariffs can be found in such countries worldwide [6]: Algeria, Kenya,
Mauritius, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Ecuador, Nicaragua, USA, India, Indonesia, South
Korea, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Israel, Turkey, Australia, Austria,
Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary,
Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, Netherlands, Portugal,
Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland and Ukraine.
Adoption of feed-in-tariffs in Ukraine was very problematic, because scientists from the
Institute of Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine declared that this will
ruin country’s energy sector. They told that renewable energy is unprofitable and losses
will be covered by ordinary people. But feed-in-tariff was adopted and today we consider
that it was an important step toward the increase use of renewables for energy production.
The electricity market of Ukraine is obliged to buy with a feed-in-tariff all the electricity
produced by renewables that was not sold directly to consumers or distributing companies.
All of this is a very big advantage of current policy instrument, because grid access is
guaranteed by law.
According to the Ukrainian law, any judicial entity can provide electricity to the grid. In
reality, electricity producing equipment must have a capacity of more than 5 kW, because
for such capacity producers must get permissions from the National inspections.
Feed-in-tariff is guaranteed by law till 2030, but from this year there is a requirement
that “green electricity” producers have to use at least 30 percent of domestic feedstock or
equipment. Starting from 2014 this value must be 50%. Because of that, today, some
foreign investors moved their factories to Ukraine. For example, Danish Vestas Wind Sys-
tems will produce wind turbine towers and nacelles at Southern Machine Building Works
[7], German “Fuhrlaender” will produce wind power units at Kramatorsk City [7].
Also, there are disadvantages in this policy instrument. For example, in Ukraine
guarantees to obtain feed-in-tariffs are given to those investors, who already completed
construction and not before it. In addition, renewable electricity projects are highly capital
intensive, and lack of microcredit programs for households can be a problem as well. Also,
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
6
Ukraine doesn’t have a single regulatory body that would support renewable industry.
Today, the implementation networks of “green” electricity production in Ukraine consist of:
- Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine;
- Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry of Ukraine;
- National Electricity Regulatory Commission of Ukraine;
- Supreme Council of Ukraine;
- State Agency on energy Efficiency and Energy Conversation of Ukraine.
Legislation on feed-in-tariff has evolved substantially and now it is quite mature. It has
some improvements all the time. For example, on November 18, 2011 the latest
amendment was adopted by Ukrainian Parliament and signed on December 8, 2011 by the
president. This means that Ukrainian government is paying too much attention to this issue
and wants to make it more attractive for investors and users. On the contrary, the Ukrainian
government wants not only to reduce green house gases by promoting renewables, but it is
looking for some benefits for Ukrainian economy. As a result, Ukraine is supporting only
those technologies, which are able to compete with the technologies working on traditional
fossil fuels. That is why president of Ukraine didn’t sign the law that was adopted by the
Parliament on October 6, 2011, which asked to give “green tariff” to electricity generated
from biogas.
Also, current legislation on feed-in-tariffs needs to be revised and improved, especially
regarding coordination of the work of the electricity generating facilities and their
connection to the general grid.
If we will look at the rate of the feed-in-tariffs in Ukraine, one can say that they are very
high. Even thought, investors say that there are some economic and administrative barriers.
Today, there is a big concern among investors about the stability of the investment
climate in Ukraine, the level of business conditions for all market players, long-term
development strategy of the energy market in the country and most importantly -
transparency of the market. All of this is very important to Ukraine, because to implement
successfully this policy instrument, Ukrainian market needs to attract billions of euros in
the investment. Among administrative barriers are permits obtaining and land ranting.
Schemes of land seizures still take place. These seizures are especially popular in the
Crimean peninsula, which is a good place for wind farms. Investors are asking for big plot
of land and latter divide it among others companies.
Because renewable energy is a young industry in Ukraine, there is a lack of experience
in the preparation of the technical documentation that accompanies a project, as well as
lack of specialists at the installation and maintenance phases. As for general grid, it has
limited capabilities to receive electricity from renewables as well as it can be characterized
as unstable. Ukrainian law doesn’t have procedure and legislation that will answer to the
question who is responsible for grid connection and who should pay for that. In reality, all
this work is a responsibility of the renewable energy companies. Also, there is no
information how much electricity can be transfer and distributed by the grid. Procedures
with land obtaining are also complicated. Very often wind farms are not constructing on the
best for that spots.
Also, there are no appropriate advocacy and information campaigns for households
regarding the benefits of small scale electricity generation.
As a conclusion, I can say that adoption of feed-in-tariffs in Ukraine has very positive
influence on the support of renewable energy and on the reduction of greenhouse gases
during energy production. According to World Bank, in 1996 Ukraine ranked 11th in the
world for total CO2 emissions, and in 2009 it ranked 22 [8]. Also, in 1990 Ukraine had
688.3 million tons CO2 eq in Energy sector and in 2009 only 255,7 million tons CO2 eq ( -
62.8% change in the last reported year, as compared with the base year) [9]. The share of
renewable energy sources in total final energy consumption also increased from 4% in1999
to 5% in 2011. Installed capacity of wind energy at the end of 2011 reached 151.1 MW [10]
(compare to 8 MW at 1997).
So, we can see obvious improvement in increasing capacity of renewables and CO2
reduction in energy sector, and feed-in-tariff is playing not a last role in all this changes.
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
7
Chapter 2
Present the data that need to be collected for the policy instrument selected in Chapter 1 and the sources that provide them. Module 4
Instructor: Dr. Harry Kambezidis
Mark: __/10
To implement feed-in-tariff policy instrument successfully, one needs to collect a lot of
data.
First of all, one needs to collect adopted policy documents aiming to create and regulate
renewable electricity market. For example, for my home country Ukraine, these policy
documents include:
- Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine Decree on the program of state support for
alternative and renewable energy and small hydro and thermal power;
- Law of Ukraine on alternative sources of energy;
- energy strategy of Ukraine till 2030;
- Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine Decree on approval of the granting of preferential
loans for investment projects on energy saving technologies for production of
alternative energy sources and others.
All these documents will help to understand current situation in this question in Ukraine
from the judicial point of view. Unfortunately, Ukraine doesn’t have a single regulatory and
coordinating body that defines and systematize the sequence of actions in the industry.
Main bodies that give advices and take part in regulation of green electricity production
in Ukraine are presented in table 1.
Table 1
Regulatory and coordinating bodies, which regulate green electricity production in Ukraine
Agency Regulation
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine
Web-site: http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/
Implementation of state policy on
alternative energy sources and its
management
State Agency on Energy Efficiency and
Energy Conservation of Ukraine
Web-site: http://saee.gov.ua/en/
Coordination of work and control over
the execution of implementing the State
Program to support the development of
renewable energy sources and small
hydro and thermal power plants
Supreme Council of Ukraine
Web-site:
http://portal.rada.gov.ua/rada/control/uk/index
Choosing of main directions of state
policy on alternative energy sources and
implementing of legal framework within
it
National Electricity Regulatory Commission
of Ukraine
Web-site: http://www.nerc.gov.ua/
Billing of the costs of connecting to the
grid of the power facilities that generate
electricity using alternative energy
sources during the approval of the
investment programs of electric grid
owners; annual disclosure of information
on the cost of connection to the electric
grids of power facilities objects that
generate electricity using alternative
energy sources; adoption of feed-in tariffs
Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry of
Ukraine
Web-site:
http://mpe.kmu.gov.ua/fuel/control/uk/index
Licensing of biogas production and
storage
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
8
Second, renewable electricity projects are mostly highly capital intensive, especially
those for solar energy. Even though the feed-in-tariff rate in Ukraine is high and grid access
is guaranteed by law [2], investors complain that a significant share of the feed-in rate is
‘‘eaten up’’ with inflation. That is why investors are interested in economic statistics of
Ukraine. They want to see possible risks and see tendency of economic growth.
State Statistics Committee of Ukraine is the government agency responsible for
collection and dissemination of statistics in Ukraine. For brevity it also referred to as
Derzhkomstat. In 2010 the committee was transformed into the State Service of Statistics
under the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade. The official website of
Committee is http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/. On this site users can easily find such data, that
important to feed-in-tariff policy instrument: the official inflation rate, GDP, GDP per
capita, national energy balance, etc.
Third, as feed-in-in tariff is mainly used to promote renewable energy, one will need a
lot of data about climate in Ukraine. For example, to install a wind turbine, one must have
information about number of windy days in that area, wind maps, wind direction (wind
rose), wind speed change with height [11]. If all these data will be satisfied to investor,
he/she will invest his/her money in that project. The same situation with solar energy. To
build a new solar plant, investors must know about the number of sunny days in that area
and staff like that. All these information can be provided according to the official request
by the National Meteorological Service in Ukraine (Ukrainian Hydrometeorological
Center). Official website http://meteo.gov.ua/en/.
Forth, hydro energy has feed-in-tariff in Ukraine too. Today, there are 84 small hydro
plants in Ukraine. Without doubt, before building new dumb, investors will request
information about the emergencies, which were caused by floods on that river. This
information can be received from the http://www.mns.gov.ua/ (Ministry of Emergencies).
Information about emergencies also important to wind farms; because, strong rotation of
blades can damage or even destroy a wind turbine.
Fifth, to receive feed-in-tariff in Ukraine, one must take couple steps. One of them is an
agreement on connection to the grid. There is no clarity whom you need to contact
(oblenergo (27 regional supply companies) or NPC ”Ukrenergo”) about connection to the
grid. However, in most cases people contact to NPC “Ukrenergo”
(http://www.ukrenergo.energy.gov.ua) if installed capacity is over 100 MW, and to
oblenergo, if it is lower than that. If you generate electricity from alternative energy
sources, you have to approve your project with NPC “Ukrenergo” regardless of the
installed capacity. Required documents: application to issue Technical Specifications and
other relevant technical information; a receipt on payment of the fee for issue of Technical
Conditions.
Also, on a way to receiving feed-in-tariff, one needs to obtain a document on
commissioning of facilities from the Architecture and building control commission
(GASK) http://www.dabi.gov.ua/.
After receiving feed-in-tariff from the National Electricity Regulatory Commission of
Ukraine, one needs to gain membership in Wholesale Electricity Market (Energorynok)
WEM http://www.er.gov.ua/. Required documents: application; short description of the
applicant’s business with indication of the territory in which the applicant plans to operate
in the first month, and afterwards – based on power supply agreements; data on annual
volume of transactions that applicant plans to execute in WEM; legal address and bank
information of the applicant confirmed by the signature of the CEO and stamp of the entity
(two copies); memorandum of agreement with the Settlement System Manager, of the
calculations of volumes, forms, deadlines, data transmission and procedures needed for
payments in accordance with WEM’s Rules; note on the nature of anticipated transactions,
agreed with the Settlement System Manager; note from NERC on no arrears for the regular
fee for license; letters of recommendation from the full members of WEM; notarized copy
of the Charter; notarized copy of the State Registration Certificate; copy of the VAT
payer’s registration certificate; copy of the document on the appointment of manager;
samples of signatures of top officials with signing authority while operating in WEM.
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
9
Next step is requiring signing an agreement on sale of power at feed-in-tariff with State
Enterprise WEM (Energorynok). Required documents: application. Energorynok then sells
power to the oblenergos and large industrial firms.
There is a distribution company in each of Ukraine’s 25 regions, plus one each in the
cities of Kyiv and Sevastopol. Among these 27 regional distribution companies, there is a
mix of state and private ownership. The distribution companies, called oblenergos, also
own small cogeneration assets, mainly to produce heat for district heating.
Finally, legalization of the usage of land can be one of the largest barriers to successful
implementation of feed-in-tariff projects. In Ukraine, farmlands may not be used as sites for
location of power generating facilities. To locate a power production plant on a farmland,
you need to cause change of designated purpose of the land plot, which in most cases is
prohibited. The procedure of changing the designated purpose is rather time consuming and
expensive. It takes a lot of time to allocate land if it is in communal and government
ownership, and to obtain a certificate of title to it.
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
10
CHAPTER 3
Describe the Business-As-Usual scenario, according to the selected policy instrument in Chapter 1.
Module 5
Instructor: Dr. Popi Konidari
Mark: __/10
First of all, before I will give answer to this question, I want to define what does
Business-As-Usual scenario (BAU) means. In the literature we can find information that it
is a scenario that will be developed, according to the existing policy and trends, without
taking into account new policy instruments targets. Also, BAU scenario can be named as
reference scenario or baseline.
- The objectives of the BAU scenario can be as follows:
- energy savings;
- reduction of GHG emissions. This reduction can be achieved through the
mechanism of the implemented climate policies;
- adaptation to climate change impacts.
The BAU scenario can provide us evolution of current mitigation and adaptation
policies of a country. Based on this scenario the outcomes of the other scenarios will be
compared against BAU. The climate change impacts for the country in the BAU scenario
are considered as moderate.
To decrease carbon emissions and to enhance security of supply, in 1996 Ukrainian
government set a target that renewable energy will cover 10% of energy consumption.
Unfortunately Ukraine didn’t reach this target. Also, according to the Energy Strategy to
2030 [2], renewable energy must cover 18.3% of primary energy consumption in Ukraine.
It is worth to mention that Ukraine signed and ratified United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change. In addition, the Kyoto Protocol was ratified as well. The
government has also committed to ensuring that emissions remain at half of 1990’s levels
by 2050. Today, energy intensity near 3 times higher than in the countries of the European
Union. That is why Ukrainian government is planning to increase energy efficiency and to
reduce energy intensity. As part of the Copenhagen Accord, Ukraine committed to ensuring
that emissions remain 20% below 1990 levels in 2020 [1].
Table 1 provides Ukrainian government commitments.
Table 1
Ukrainian government commitments
Renewable energy Target – 18.3% of primary energy
consumption from renewables by 2030.
Green House Gas emissions A Copenhagen Accord is asking to keep
GHG emissions 20% below the 1990.
Energy intensity in Ukraine is very high, that is why it is the main priority of the
government to increase energy efficiency. The national policy of Ukraine includes the
following legal framework as mitigation policy instruments:
- Law on alternative sources of energy;
- Law for the establishment of “Green” tariff (feed-in-tariff);
- Law that offers tax incentives for energy efficiency and renewable energy
investment;
- “Law on energy conservation” was adopted by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on
July 1, 1994;
- Ukraine’s Energy Strategy for the Period Until 2030, adopted in March 2006 [2].
- Program on state support of development of non-traditional and renewable energy
sources [3].
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
11
As for the Law of Ukraine on Alternative Sources of Energy, it was passes by
Ukrainian Parliament on November 29, 2001. This law defines legal, economic
environmental and organizational framework for the use of alternative energy sources and
promoting their use in energy complex.
The main principles of state policy on alternative energy sources are:
- reduce consumption of traditional energy resources and dependence in their imports
by increasing production and consumption from alternative sources;
- environmental safety by operation alternative energy facilities and transmission,
transportation, supply, storage and consumption of energy, produced from alternative
sources;
- support and promotion of science and technology in this field;
- attracting domestic and foreign investment and support entrepreneurship in the field
of alternative energy sources, including the development and implementation of national
and local programs development of alternative energy.
Main legislative acts governing the alternative energy in Ukraine are following:
- the Law of Ukraine «On Alternative Energy Sources» #555-IV dd. 20.02.2003;
- the Law of Ukraine «On Alternative Types of Liquid and Gaseous Fuel» # 1391-
XIV dd.14.01.2000;
- the Law of Ukraine «On Electrical Power Industry» # 575/97 dd.16.10.1997.
According to the energy strategy of Ukraine till 2030 it is planned to achieve the
following indexes:
Table 2
BAU scenario for use of alternative energy (mil. t.r.f.t./year) [12]
Years
2005 2010 2020 2030
Renewable energy
sources, total incl. 1,661 3,842 12,054 35,53
Bio energy 1,3 2,7 6,3 9,2
Solar energy 0,003 0,032 0,284, 1,1
Small hydropower 0,12 0,52 0,85 1,13
Geothermal energy 0,02 0,08 0,19 0,7
Wind energy 0,018 0,21 0,53 0,7
Ambient energy 0,2 0,3 3,9 22,7
Also, Ukraine created legislative base concerning climate change.
Law for the establishment of “Green” tariff (feed-in-tariff) can be considered as one
of the basic mitigation steps which were done by Ukraine. The law for the establishment of
this tariff Ukrainian parliament passed on September 25, 2008.
Before to this law, tariffs were set for each generating plant by the National
Electricity Regulatory Commission. The feed-in-tariff was then amended in April 2009 –
About Amendments to the Law of Ukraine “On Electricity” to Encourage the Use of
Alternative Energy Sources № 1220-VI, 2009.04.01.
The goal of feed-in-tariff is to offer cost-based compensation to renewable energy
producers, providing the price certainty and long-term contracts that help finance
renewable energy investments.
In Ukraine not all sources of green energy production can receive feed-in-tariff, but
some are eligible. They are: solar energy, wind energy, hydro energy (only small
hydropower plants with the generation capacity not exceeding 10 MW). The feed-in-tariffs
for renewable power producers in Ukraine are set by the national regulator. As of January
5, 2012 the following tariffs per kWh were applied: biomass – UAH 1.3446 (EUR 0.13),
wind – UAH 1.23 (EUR 0.12), small hydro – UAH 0.8418 (EUR 0.08), solar - UAH
5.0509 (EUR 0.46) [5]. In case of significant fluctuations of the national currency against
Euro the feed-in-tariffs are adjusted to reflect the changes.
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
12
Under the current law, every month feed-in-tariff is set by the National Electricity
Regulatory Commission. The tariff rate that generators receive for their output is based
upon the retail tariff rate for customers of second-class voltage in January 2009. This 2009
tariff rate was converted into EUR at the central bank rate in January 2009 (53.85
EUR/MWh) and every month National Electricity Regulatory Commission reconverts the
EUR rate back into UAH, using the current official central bank conversion rate on the day
the rates are set. The tariff the generators received is then adjusted by technology bands
adjusted for each technology. Therefore, the EUR rate in January 2009 effectively acts as a
minimum amount when formulating monthly rates [13].
Table 3 shows the effective minimum rates for the feed-in-tariffs based on the
January 2009 retail tariff rate. The technology factors will be reduced by 10, 20 and 30%
from the base in 2014, 2019, and 2024 respectively. In addition, for solar power and small
hydropower, the retail tariff rate used in the calculation increased by a factor of 1.8 when
the green tariffs were formulated [14].
Table 3
Effective minimum green tariff rates based on January 2009 retail tariff rate
(EUR/MWH) [15]
Technology
Retailed rate
in January
2009
Technology
factor Tariff rate
wind <600 kW 53.85 1.2 64.62
>2.000 kW 53.85 1.4 75.39
>2.000 kW 53.85 2.1 113.09
Biomass 53.85 2.3 123.86
Solar
Ground 96.93 4.8 465.26
Roof mounted<100 kW 96.93 4.4 426.49
Roof mounted>100 kW 96.93 4.6 445.88
Small hydro (<10 MW) 96.93 0.8 77.54
Table 4 shows the green feed-in-tariff rates in March 2011, which were based upon
the EUR-UAH conversion rate in February 2011.
Table 4
Green tariffs for renewable power generation in Ukraine in March 2011 [16]
Technology
UAH/MWh EUR/MWh
Retailed
rate
Technology
factor Tariff rate Tariff rate
wind <600 kW 586.6 1.2 703.92 64.94
>2.000 kW 586.6 1.4 821.24 75.77
>2.000 kW 586.6 2.1 1,231.86 113.65
Biomass 586.6 2.3 1,349.18 124.47
Solar
Ground 1,055.88 4.8 5,068.18 467.58
Roof mounted<100 kW 1,055.88 4.4 4,645.87 428.62
Roof mounted>100 kW 1,055.88 4.6 4,857.05 448.10
Small hydro (<10 MW) 1,055.88 0.8 844.70 77.93
To receive the feed-in-tariff in Ukraine starting from January 1, 2012, one must
consider that a minimum of 30% of the raw materials, capital assets, and construction
services has to be of Ukrainian origin. This requirement will rise to 50% on January 1,
2014. In addition, from January 1, 2012 , 30% of the material used in solar power plants
has to be of Ukrainian origin to receive the tariff [2]. All output of system registered for
the feed-in-tariff is purchased by the market operator, thus developers are not required to
sign power purchasing agreements with a supplier.
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
13
CHAPTER 4
Evaluate the policy instrument that you chose on Chapter 1.
Module 6B
Instructor: Dr. Popi Konidari
Mark: __/10
“To evaluate feed-in-tariff policy instrument I used AMS method, which consists of
three standard multi-criteria methods: the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Multi-
Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) and the Simple Multi-Attribute Ranking Technique
(SMART). AHP provides weight coefficients and MAUT/SMART grades for the
performance of interactions under selected criteria [17-18].
For the first step, according to my opinion, I determined the interaction forms of feed-
in-tariff policy instrument. The four classification categories are the following.
Objectives - establishment of a feed-in-tariff – a special tariff rate – at which there is
purchased the electric energy, as generated by power generation facilities using alternative
energy sources (except for blast furnace and coke gases, and as regards the use of hydro
power it only pertains to that generated by small hydro power plants of installed capacity
not exceeding 10 MW).
Target groups – feed-in-tariff is set for each business entity that produces electrical
energy using alternative energy sources and for each power industry object.
Implementation network of feed-in-tariffs in Ukraine consists from important steps that
must be done by renewable energy producers. First of all, one must apply to the National
Electricity Regulatory Commission of Ukraine for a license to produce electric energy; to
file NERC a request for a “green tariff” to be prescribed; to become a member at the
Wholesale Electricity Market (Energorynok).
Produced electric power from renewable energy sources may be sold directly to
Energorynok or directly to the consumers. However, due to high cost of “green energy” in
practice all producers are selling through the Energorynok, which enjoying the monopoly
position.
In Ukraine implementation network of “green” electricity production consists of:
- Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine;
- Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry of Ukraine;
- National Electricity Regulatory Commission of Ukraine;
- Supreme Council of Ukraine;
- State Agency on energy Efficiency and Energy Conversation of Ukraine.
Also, Ukraine has trained personnel capable in supporting implementation of the
instrument. They have skills, knowledge and experience in climate policy issues, usage of
technologies, tools, methods and analyses regarding these issues.
Rules and influencing mechanisms
The feed-in-tariff may be prescribed if:
- the electric power Producer uses alternative power sources only. In case the
technology of electric power production is based on the simultaneous use of traditional
types of fuel, the feed-in-tariff may not be applied
- not less than 30% (since January 1, 2012) and no less than 50% (since January 1,
2014) of the materials, raw materials, capital assets, works and services involved in
construction of electric power generating facilities has to be of Ukrainian origin;
- there are available finished energy generating facilities, as connected to the network.
Conformity of the facilities to the project documents, requirements of the state
standards, construction standards and rules to be witnessed by an appropriate Certificate.
Essential Aspects of feed-in-tariff:
- the laws of Ukraine provide for a fixed minimum rate of the feed-in- tariff and binds
the “Green” tariff on Euro, thus, in case of implementation of a project of generation of
electric energy from alternative energy sources, the investor is protected against UAH
potential inflation;
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
14
- the feed-in-tariff rate will be reduced by 10, 20 and 30% from the base in 2014, 2019,
and 2024 respectively;
- the whole electric energy generated from objects that got feed-in-tariff, must be paid
fully according to installed feed-in-tariff rate;
- feed-in-tariff will take place in Ukraine until January 1, 2030.
After that I created my criteria tree.
All three forms of interactions create a first level. Also, each of this forms I divided into
secondary forms of interactions (fig.1).
Fig.1. The AHP hierarchy
The next step was determination of weight coefficients. I did that on my own preference
(using scale from 1 to 9). Table 1 provides pairwise comparisons between the interaction
levels.
Table 1 Criteria (second level) Establishment of
a feed-in-tariff
Production of alternative energy
under the feed-in-tariff
Implementation network, Rules and influencing
mechanisms
Establishment of a feed-in-tariff
1.000 0.2 3
Production of alternative energy
under the feed-in-tariff
5 1.000 7
Implementation network,
Rules and influencing mechanisms
0.33 0.14 1.000
Column sum 6.33 1.34 11.00
Table 2
Normalized matrix Criteria Establishment of
a feed-in-tariff
Production of
alternative energy
under the feed-in-tariff
Implementation
network,
Rules and
Row sum Weight
Coef.
Establishment of a feed-in-tariff
0.158 0.149 0.273 0.580 0.193
Production of
alternative energy under
the feed-in-tariff
0.789 0.745 0.636 2.171 0.724
Implementation
network, Rules and influencing
mechanisms
0.053 0.106 0.091 0.250 0.083
After testing consistency of weight coefficients, by using Saaty method, I got that
λmax = 3.065; CI=0.032; CR=0.05.
Establishment of a feed-in-tariff
Production of alternative energy under
the feed-in-tariff
Renewables promotion
Reduction of CO2 during energy
production
Mitigation of climate change by
acceleration of
investments in renewable energy
technologies
Indirect environmental effects
Energy independence
Cost efficiency
Dynamic cost efficiency
Competiveness
Implementation network,
Rules and influencing mechanisms
Implementation network capacity
Administrative feasibility
Financial feasibility
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
15
Then, I did pairwise comparison for subcriteria under each criterion.
Table 3 provides pairwise comparison between sub-criteria of “Establishment of a
feed-in-tariff”.
Table 3 Establishment
of a feed-in-tariff
Renewables
promotion
Reduction of CO2 during
energy production
Indirect
environmental effects
Energy
independence
Renewables promotion
1 5 9 3
Reduction of CO2 during energy production
0.2 1 5 2
Indirect environmental effects
0.111 0.2 1 0.25 Energy independence 0.333 0.5 4 1 Column sum 1.64 6.7 19 6.25
Table 4
Normalized matrix Establishment
of a feed-in-tariff
Renewables
promotion
Reduction of CO2
during energy
production
Indirect
environmental
effects
Energy
independence
Row
sum
Weight
Coef.
Renewables
promotion
0.608 0.746 0.474 0.480 2.308 0.58
Reduction of CO2 during energy
production
0.122 0.149 0.263 0.320 0.854 0.21
Indirect
environmental
effects
0.068 0.03 0.053 0.04 0.190 0.05
Energy
independence 0.203 0.075 0.211 0.160 0.648 0.16
After testing consistency of weight coefficients by using Saaty method, I got that
λmax = 4.23; CI=0.0756; CR=0.084.
Table 5 provides pairwise comparison between sub-criteria of “Production of alternative
energy under the feed-in-tariff”.
Table 5 Production of alternative
energy under the feed-in-tariff
Cost
efficiency
Dynamic cost efficiency Competiveness
Cost efficiency 1 6 7
Dynamic cost efficiency 0.17 1 2
Competiveness 0.14 0.5 1
Column sum 1.31 7.5 10.0
Table 6
Normalized matrix Criteria Cost efficiency Dynamic cost
efficiency
Competiveness Row sum Weight
Coef.
Cost efficiency 0.764 0.8 0.7 2.264 0.755
Dynamic cost efficiency 0.127 0.133 0.2 0.461 0.154
Competiveness 0.109 0.067 0.1 0.276 0.092
After testing consistency of weight coefficients by using Saaty method, I got that
λmax = 3.032; CI=0.016; CR=0.028.
Table 7 provides pairwise comparison between sub-criteria of “Implementation
network, Rules and influencing mechanisms”.
Table 7 Implementation network,
Rules and influencing mechanisms
Implementation
network capacity
Administrative
feasibility
Financial feasibility
Implementation network capacity 1 2 3
Administrative feasibility 0.5 1 2
Financial feasibility
0.33 0.5 1
Column sum 1.83 3.5 6
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
16
Table 8
Normalized matrix Criteria Implementation
network capacity
Administrative
feasibility
Financial
feasibility
Row sum Weight
Coef.
Implementation
network capacity 0.545 0.571 0.5 1.617 0.539
Administrative feasibility 0.273 0.286 0.33 0.892 0.297
Financial feasibility
0.182 0.143 0.167 0.491 0.164
After testing consistency of weight coefficients by using Saaty method, I got that
λmax = 3.009; CI=0.0046; CR=0.0079.
Then I graded the type and size of interactions.
Because of lack of appropriate data I used SMART. I graded on my own interaction
type and size under a particular criterion/subcriterion using scale. To convert my DM
grades into SMART I used , where mi – is DM’s grade (in this case is mine).
I used such scale of performance of the policy instrument regarding to every criterion.
Table 9
Grades for sub-criteria of “Establishment of a feed-in-tariff” Establishment of a feed-in-
tariff
Renewables promotion
Reduction of CO2 during energy
production
Indirect environmental effects
Energy independence
DM SMART DM SMART DM SMART DM SMART 5 9.98 3 3.98 1 1.58 2 2.51
Table 10
Grades for sub-criteria of “Production of alternative energy under the feed-in-tariff” Production of
alternative
energy under the
feed-in-tariff
Cost efficiency Dynamic cost efficiency
Competiveness
DM SMART DM SMART DM SMART 3 3.98 2 2.51 3 3.98
Table 11
Grades for sub-criteria of “Implementation network, Rules and influencing mechanisms” Implementation
network, Rules and
influencing
mechanisms
Implementation
network capacity
Administrative
feasibility
Financial feasibility
DM SMART DM SMART DM SMART 3 3.98 2 2.51 1 1.58
Calculation of grades
To calculate grades I used such equation [18]:
So, the grade for sub-criteria of “Establishment of a feed-in-tariff”(grade 1) will be
equal:
Grade1= 9.98*0.58+3.98*0.21+1.58*0.05+2.51*0.16=7.1048.
Grade for sub-criteria of “Production of alternative energy under the feed-in-
tariff”(grade 2) will be equal:
Grade 2= 3.98*0.755+2.51*0.154+3.98*0.092=3.7576.
Grade for sub-criteria of “Implementation network, Rules and influencing mechanisms“
grade 3) will be equal:
Grade 3= 3.98*0.755+2.51*0.297+1.58*0.164=3.14981.
Total grade=7.1048*0.193+3.7576*0.724+3.14981*0.083= 4.35.
PROMITHEAS-4: Knowledge transfer and research needs for preparing mitigation/adaptation policy portfolios
17
REFERENCES 1.National Environmental Investment Agency of Ukraine, Government of Ukraine,
2010 Letter to the UNFCCC. Available at:
http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_15/copenhagen_accord/application/pdf/ukrainecpha
ccord_app1.pdf.
2.Energy Strategy of Ukraine to 2030. Available at:
http://mpe.kmu.gov.ua/fuel/control/uk/doccatalog/list?currDir=50505
3.Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Decree of 31 December 1997 No. 1505 “On the
Programme of state support for development of non-traditional and renewable energy
sources and small hydro and thermal energy”.
4.Policymaker's Guide to Feed-in Tariff Policies, U.S. National Renewable Energy Lab.
Available at: www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/44849.pdf.
5. Green tariff and future of Ukraine. Available in Ukrainian language at:
http://jkg-portal.com.ua/ua/publication/one/alternativne-majbutne-ukrajini.
6.Miguel Mendonça and David Jacobs. Feed-in Tariffs Go Global: Policy in Practice.
Available at: http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2009/09/feed-in-
tariffs-go-global-policy-in-practice.
7. Wind Energy Developments in Ukraine. Available at:
http://www.mywindpowersystem.com/2011/12/wind-energy-developments-in-ukraine/
8. World carbon dioxide emissions data by country. Available at:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/jan/31/world-carbon-dioxide-emissions-
country-data-co2.
9. National inventory report of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by
sinks of greenhouse gases in Ukraine for 1990-2009. – Kiev. – 2011. – 519 p.
10. Tendencies of wind energy sector development in Ukraine. www.uwea.com.ua
11.S. Bobliakh. Renewable energy. – National University of Lesja Ukrainka. – Lutsk. –
2012. – 227 p.
12. Arzinger. «Energy law guide. Traditional Energies. Renewable Energies. Carbon
Trading». -Kyiv, - 2009/
13. NERC. Decree of 16.07.2009 - 828 Approving the amendments to the Order of the
installation, revision and termination of "green" tariff for business entities. NERC Website,
available at:
http://www.nerc.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article/main?art_id=82048&cat_id=34446.
14. Derived from NERC, Decree of 16.07.2009 No 828 Approving the amendments to
the Order of the installation, revision and termination of "green" tariff for business entities.
15. Policymaker's Guide to Feed-in Tariff Policies, U.S. National Renewable Energy
Lab. Available at: www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/44849.pdf.
16. Biogas: The Energy Revolution’s All-rounder. Available at:
http://www.german-biogas-industry.com/overview/biogas-the-energy-revolutions-all
rounder/.
17. http://www.scribd.com/doc/82122327/saaty.
18. Popi Konidari, Dimitrios Mavrakis. Multi-criteria evaluation of climate policy
interactions. – Wiley InterScience. – 2006.
19. Lectures from Module 6B and Modul 6A.