fin connect vol i issue 2.pdf

Download Fin Connect Vol I Issue 2.pdf

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: aviral-sharma

Post on 13-Sep-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Fin Connect Page 1

    BMSB

    FIN -CONNECT

    EDITOR Bikramaditya Ghosh, Asst. Prof.

    EDITORIAL COMMITTEE- DR.Umashanker K / Ms. GAYATRI BHAT, Asst. Prof.

    / Mr. B.V.RAO /Mr. Keshava Murthy

    Strictly for Internal Circulation

    VOL.1 ISSUE-2

    May 2014

  • Fin Connect Page 2

    Content

    Editorial By Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh, Asst. Prof. Manipal

    University P-3-3

    USD Vs. EURO A comparative Study from INR perspective

    By Tanya Singh 10A P-4-11

    HSBC Scandal Case Study on Money Laundering

    By Prapti Barman 9E P-12-21

    An analysis of debt securities market in India

    By Hardeep Singh Chawla 9D P-22-34

    POVERTY An Economic Perspective

    By Richa Prakash 9D P-34-43

    Blog from a Senior Banker - Mr. Keshava Murthy P-44-49

    -Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh, Asst.

    Prof. Manipal University P-49-52

    Disclaimer- This magazine does not reflect any views of either BOB or Manipal Group.

    This is a pure research endeavor by budding managers of tomorrow.

  • Fin Connect Page 3

    Editorial

    It has been a dynamic & eventful journey to discover the latent

    talent hidden within the student fraternity by virtue of enhancing

    their ideas in BFSI domain. The enthusiasm & ideas have come out

    so far has been quite impressive. This is our second issue, and with a

    promise that many more to come after that, we in BMSB are proud

    to show case the work done by our students once again.

    I would like to thank our Director Dr. Thammaiah, our Assoc. Dean

    Mr. Rahul Aradhya, our HOD Mr. Ramaprasad, our own moving

    encyclopedia (Wikipedia) Mr. Keshava Murthy, our Banking

    Partner Mr. Ashok Bhatnagar (BOB) and countless colleagues &

    students in coming up with such an unique endevour.

    The journey in Fin Connect has been as enjoyable as the final

    outcome. I invite more & more such Articles to us from the entire

    student fraternity. Come up & Show case your talent my friends.

    1

    1 Swami Vivekananda Vol-1 Pg. 342

  • Fin Connect Page 4

    USD Vs. EURO A comparative Study from INR perspective

    By Tanya Singh 10A

    Introduction

    Foreign Exchange market forms a very important part of a economy.

    The foreign exchange market (Forex, FX, or currency market) is a global

    decentralized market for the trading of currencies. The main participants

    in this market are the larger international banks. Financial centers around

    the world function as anchors of trading between a wide range of

    different types of buyers and sellers around the clock, with the exception

    of weekends. Electronic Broking Services (EBS) and Reuters 3000 Xtra

    are two main interbank FX trading platforms. The foreign exchange

    market determines the relative values of different currencies.

    The foreign exchange market works through financial institutions, and it

    operates on several levels. Behind the scenes banks turn to a smaller

    actively involved

    in large quantities of foreign exchange trading. Most foreign exchange

  • Fin Connect Page 5

    dealers are banks, so this behind-the-scenes market is sometimes called

    kinds of financial firms are involved. Trades between foreign exchange

    dealers can be very large, involving hundreds of millions of dollars

    Because of the sovereignty issue when involving two currencies, Forex

    has little (if any) supervisory entity regulating its actions. A bank has to

    have a sound Forex trading policy and at the same time it's important

    for every banker to understand the basic idea of foreign exchange and

    how our currency is linked to other currency or what is the major

    relation between the important or top currencies. Now the Forex

    segment of Bank of Baroda deals in majorly 6 currencies i.e.

    Australian Dollar

    Japanese Yen

    US Dollar

    Swiss Franc

    Canadian Dollar

    Euro

    The article here tries to throw light on the relation between two of the

    currencies mentioned above i.e. USD and EURO. The US$ being one of

    the very important currency of the world in which not only majority of

    trades take place world over but also it is considered as reserve currency.

    Thus one would find that our Forex reserves are quoted in $ terms. Any

    major change in US$ rates brings about a big impact in Indian economy

    and many other economies. On the other hand Euro is the common

    currency of whole of European zone or European countries which

    include Germany, France, Austria etc. which are big countries. Thus

  • Fin Connect Page 6

    establishing a relation between these currencies and their movements

    would help us understand them better.

    Calculation

    As a part of the comparison here data was taken from past 3 years which

    comprised of 622 observations each of US$ as well as Euro rate to see if

    there exists a relation or not. For the same purpose the open, closing

    position, last traded price, low, high positions were all taken into

    account. Afterwards correlation and regression analysis have been

    performed to assess the relationship between the two.

    SUMMARY OUTPUT

    Regression Statistics

    Multiple R- 0.9539

    R- 0 .9100

    Adjusted R is 0.909

    020406080

    100

    0 50 100 150

    Y

    Sample Percentile

    Normal Probability Plot

  • Fin Connect Page 7

    Interpretation

    On the basis of the above linear regression model used we can make

    the several interpretations which help is making us understand

    whether does a relation between US$ and Euro currency exists and if

    yes than how can it affect the exchange rates etc.

    the regression analysis is basically used to establish relation that

    how much change in independent variable can affect our

    dependent variable

    the R or R square tells about the forecasting of our regression

    model i.e. it tells that it can correctly predict up to 91 % of

    forecasting or variation in the level of USD due to change in the

    EURO rate

    this calculation has been made on the basis of 622 observations

    which have been taken over the period of past 3years.

    T Stat along with P Value teaches us that the phenomenon did not

    happened by chance.

    T Stat of +- 10 means the extreme ends of the distribution curve.

    There if P Value is zero, that will signify that the distribution curve

    do not have a long tail in either side.

    On the contrary it has zero value in both the Tails, so the

    distribution is concentrated straight & long.

    -10

    -5

    0

    5

    0 20 40 60 80

    Re

    sid

    ua

    ls

    X Variable 1

    X Variable 1 Residual Plot

  • Fin Connect Page 8

    This further means that confidence level of occurrence of that

    event is very high.

    So, the Null Hypothesis stands rejected.

    Aside from factors such as interest rates and inflation, the exchange rate is one of the most important determinants of a

    country's relative level of economic health. Exchange rates play a

    vital role in a country's level of trade, which is critical to most

    every free market economy in the world. For this reason, exchange

    rates are among the most watched, analyzed and governmentally

    manipulated economic measures. But exchange rates matter on a

    smaller scale as well: they impact the real return of an investor's

    portfolio. Here we look at some of the major forces behind

    exchange rate movements.

    Overview

    Before we look at these forces, we should sketch out how

    exchange rate movements affect a nation's trading relationships

    with other nations. A higher currency makes a

    country's exports more expensive and imports cheaper in foreign

    markets; a lower currency makes a country's exports cheaper and

    its imports more expensive in foreign markets. A higher exchange

    rate can be expected to lower the country's balance of trade, while

    a lower exchange rate would increase it.

    Numerous factors determine exchange rates, and all are related to

    the trading relationship between two countries. Remember,

    exchange rates are relative, and are expressed as a comparison of

    the currencies of two countries. The following are some of the

    principal determinants of the exchange rate between two countries.

    Note that these factors are in no particular order; like many aspects

    of economics, the relative importance of these factors is subject to

    much debate.

    As a general rule, a country with a consistently lower inflation rate

    http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/interestrate.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/inflation.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/exchangerate.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/export.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/import.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bot.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currency.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/economics.asp
  • Fin Connect Page 9

    exhibits a rising currency value, as its purchasing power increases

    relative to other currencies. During the last half of the twentieth

    century, the countries with low inflation included Japan, Germany

    and Switzerland, while the U.S. and Canada achieved low inflation

    only later. Those countries with higher inflation typically see

    depreciation in their currency in relation to the currencies of their

    trading partners. This is also usually accompanied by higher

    interest rates.

    Interest rates, inflation and exchange rates are all highly correlated.

    By manipulating interest rates, central banks exert influence over

    both inflation and exchange rates, and changing interest rates

    impact inflation and currency values. Higher interest rates offer

    lenders in an economy a higher return relative to other countries.

    Therefore, higher interest rates attract foreign capital and cause the

    exchange rate to rise. The impact of higher interest rates is

    mitigated, however, if inflation in the country is much higher than

    in others, or if additional factors serve to drive the currency down.

    The opposite relationship exists for decreasing interest rates - that

    is, lower interest rates tend to decrease exchange rates.

    The current account is the balance of trade between a country and

    its trading partners, reflecting all payments between countries for

    goods, services, interest and dividends. A deficit in the current

    account shows the country is spending more on foreign trade than

    it is earning, and that it is borrowing capital from foreign sources

    to make up the deficit. In other words, the country requires more

    foreign currency than it receives through sales of exports, and it

    supplies more of its own currency than foreigners demand for its

    http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/centralbank.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currentaccount.asp
  • Fin Connect Page 10

    products. The excess demand for foreign currency lowers the

    country's exchange rate until domestic goods and services are

    cheap enough for foreigners, and foreign assets are too expensive

    to generate sales for domestic interests.

    Countries will engage in large-scale deficit financing to pay for

    public sector projects and governmental funding. While such

    activity stimulates the domestic economy, nations with large public

    deficits and debts are less attractive to foreign investors. The

    reason? A large debt encourages inflation, and if inflation is high,

    the debt will be serviced and ultimately paid off with cheaper real

    dollars in the future.

    In the worst case scenario, a government may print money to pay

    part of a large debt, but increasing the money supply inevitably

    causes inflation. Moreover, if a government is not able to service

    its deficit through domestic means (selling domestic bonds,

    increasing the money supply), then it must increase the supply of

    securities for sale to foreigners, thereby lowering their prices.

    Finally, a large debt may prove worrisome to foreigners if they

    believe the country risks defaulting on its obligations. Foreigners

    will be less willing to own securities denominated in that currency

    if the risk of default is great. For this reason, the country's debt

    rating (as determined by Moody's or Standard & Poor's, for

    example) is a crucial determinant.

    A ratio comparing export prices to import prices, the terms of trade

    is related to current accounts and the balance of payments. If the

    price of a country's exports rises by a greater rate than that of its

    http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bond.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/default2.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sp.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bop.asp
  • Fin Connect Page 11

    imports, its terms of trade have favorably improved. Increasing

    terms of trade shows greater demand for the country's exports.

    This, in turn, results in rising revenues from exports, which

    provides increased demand for the country's currency (and an

    increase in the currency's value). If the price of exports rises by a

    smaller rate than that of its imports, the currency's value will

    decrease in relation to its trading partners.

    Foreign investors inevitably seek out stable countries with strong

    economic performance in which to invest their capital. A country

    with such positive attributes will draw investment funds away from

    other countries perceived to have more political and economic risk.

    Political turmoil, for example, can cause a loss of confidence in a

    currency and a movement of capital to the currencies of more

    stable countries.

    Conclusion

    Our regression model above is able to portray a very accurate

    picture more than 90% of times. The two exchange rates are very

    strongly and positively correlated which can be construed as a

    movement in one will result in strong positive movement in the

    other currency too. Similarly the regression model explains us that

    a movement/change in the independent variable i.e. Euro will

    strongly affect dependent variable i.e. US Dollar in the similar

    direction, i.e. if there is appreciation in the value of Euro then we

    will see appreciation in the movement of USD too. Also if we will

    plot the values on the normal distribution curve, it will be a

    standard bell shaped curve with no tail as all the observations are

    concentrated uniformly near the center.

  • Fin Connect Page 12

    References

    1. http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=INR

    2. http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=EUR

    3. http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=INR&to=EUR

    4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters_3000_Xtra

    5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Broking_Services

    6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency

    HSBC Scandal Case Study on Money Laundering

    By Prapti Barman 9E

    What is Money Laundering?

    legitimate

    income so as to lose the trail of illegal transactions, it appears to be

    http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=INRhttp://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=EURhttp://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=INR&to=EURhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters_3000_Xtrahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Broking_Serviceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency
  • Fin Connect Page 13

    white or legitimate money. Money laundering is a relative term and its

    interpretation varies from situation to situation. For instance, in some

    places tax evasion may be considered as a form of money laundering

    while it may not be so in some other places. Basic process of money

    laundering constitutes three different stages which are placing the

    money in a legal channel; layering or camouflaging the money source

    through series of complicated transactions and the final step is

    integrating the funds acquired through illegal transactions. Further

    elaboration on this topic is beyond the scope of this article. Money

    laundering is a serious crime although it may appear that nobody is

    victimized. As per recent statistics, it counts for over $500 billion

    annually.

    HSBC AML Policy

    -

    money laundering practice in all markets and jurisdictions in which it

    operates and to comply with both specific provisions and the spirit of all

    relevant laws and regulations. This

    policy applies not only to money

    laundering but also to terrorist

    financing as mentioned in HSBC

    Group Money Laundering

    Deterrence Global Policy and

    Principles. This policy reflects the

    Money Laundering and 9 special recommendations to counter terrorist

    financing. According to these recommendations that were published in

    October 2004, any financial institution must maintain customer due

    diligence and maintain record, monitoring and reporting of suspicious

  • Fin Connect Page 14

    transactions, other measures to deter money laundering and terrorist

    financing, regulation and supervision, etc.

    HSBC Global policy has provisions

    Key elements of the policy include:

    a) Customer Due Diligence :

    i) Obtaining and verifying identity of a prospective customer

    using reliable, independent document/ electronic source

    material. Steps to be taken to ensure no customer is using

    fake identity.

    ii) Appropriate KYC information (personal, business and

    financial details and source of funds) before starting a

    relationship. Proper risk analysis using all accounting and

    other banking tools available.

    b) Identification and Reporting of suspicious transactions :

    Appropriate scrutiny and monitoring of transactions and account

    activity of customers using a risk based approach with increased

    suspicious activity noted by any business unit should be reported to

    a Central Money Laundering Reporting Office Function who will

    validate the suspicions and report to relevant authorities.

    c) Maintaining records for at least 5 years after the relationship with

    customer has ended or after the date of transaction as required by

    local law or regulation.

    d) Screening of payment against any sanctions/ lists issued by UN or

    other competent local authorities.

  • Fin Connect Page 15

    e) Training of all employees to ensure all of them are aware and

    laundering deterrence.

    Figure 1 : Five steps of HSBC Global Anti Money Laundering Policy

    HSBC USA Money Laundering Events :

    In 2005 Bloomberg Markets magazine accused HSBC of money-

    laundering for drug dealers and state sponsors of terrorism. CEO

    and wholly irresponsible

    subsequent investigation indicated that the accusation was accurate

    and proved that the bank was involved in money laundering

    throughout Mexico.

    HSBC Mexico which had inadequate money laundering controls,

    shipped $7billion to HSBC US operations between 2007-08. Drug

    traffickers used HSBC Mexico as conduit to ship US dollars from

    Mexico to US thereby fooling the anti money laundering measures.

    Evidence indicated bulk travellers cheque worth millions of dollars

    and resistance to closing account linked to suspicious activities. The

    bank categorized Mexico as low risk zone thereby weakening risk

    monitoring policy. Mexican traffickers used boxes specifically

    designed to the dimensions of an HSBC Mexico teller's window to

    deposit cash on a daily basis.

    Risk Assessment

    of customers

    Low Medium

    - High

    Obtaining

    KYC

    information

    Transaction

    monitoring

    using risk

    based

    approach

    Report of

    suspicious

    transaction

    s

    Maintaining

    records

  • Fin Connect Page 16

    Although it is prohibited by US laws to deal with individuals or

    organizations deemed dangerous, HSBC US carried on about 28000

    such sensitive transactions worth about $19.7 billion between 2001 -

    07 majority of which involved Iran. Other countries were Libya,

    Sudan, Cuba, Burma and Korea.

    HSBC also had business tie up with Al Rajhi Bank, biggest financial

    institution of Saudi Arabia. After suspected tie of US 9/11 terrorist

    attack with Al Rajhi Bank, HSBC US cut off all ties with the bank

    after 2001. But when Al Rajhi began to threaten to withdraw global

    ties with HSBC, HSBC US resumed business transaction with the

    bank after 2006.

    Between 2005 and 2008, HSBC US cleared $290million worth of US dollar travellers' cheques which were being presented at a Japanese

    bank. Further investigation proved that the origin of said transactions

    were from Russia which is flagged as high risk zone in terms of

    money laundering activities.

    In 2008, the federal prosecutor in Wheeling, West Virginia, began investigating allegations that a local doctor used the bank to launder

    money from Medicare fraud.

  • Fin Connect Page 17

  • Fin Connect Page 18

    Permanent Subcommittee on Hearing HSBC Money laundering

    Case

    US Senate permanent Subcommittee started its investigation since

    February 2012.

    Location: Room 106, Dirksen Senate Office Building

    Time: July 17, 2012 09:30AM

    Members

    CHAIRMAN - Carl Levin D

    RANKING COMMITTEE

    MEMBER - Tom Coburn R

    David S. Cohen

    Leigh H. Winchell

    David Bagley

    Paul Thurston

    Michael Gallagher

    Christopher Lok

    Panel 1

    Panel 2

    Panel 3

    Panel 4

    Irene Dorner

    Stuart A. Levey

    Thomas J. Curry

    Grace E. Dailey

    Daniel P. Stipano

  • Fin Connect Page 19

    Violations:

    Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) by failing to maintain an effective anti-money

    laundering program and to conduct appropriate due diligence on its

    foreign correspondent account holders.

    International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the

    Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) by illegally conducting transactions

    on behalf of customers in Cuba, Iran, Libya, Sudan and Burma.

    HSBC appeal:

    Since 2009 it increased its investment in AML policy nine times and

    also withdrew from various business transactions.

    Paul Thurston, HSBC Chief of Retail and Wealth Management, said the

    bank 'took wrongdoing seriously' and provided evidence for the same

    Senate Report:

    From 2001 to 2007, HSBC affiliates sent almost 25,000 transactions

    involving Iran worth over $19billion (12billion) through HBUS and

    other US accounts, while concealing any link with Iran in 85 per cent of

    -called bearer share

    accounts, in which ownership of shares and the income they incur can be

    passed from person to person in secrecy.

    In 2010, one disgusted top compliance official threw up his hands and

    quit after less than a year on the job, according to the report.

    At the heart of HSBC's failings was the fact that it served as a hub for

    smaller financial firms needing access to the global banking system, the

    report said.

  • Fin Connect Page 20

    HSBC continued to do business with one client Sigue Corp that admitted

    to U.S. law enforcement that it had failed to maintain an effective anti-

    money laundering system.

    Outcome:

    Deferred Prosecution Agreement with US Department of Justice.

    HSBC US Money laundering aftermath

    The settlement is the third time in a decade that HSBC has been

    penalized for lax controls and ordered by U.S. authorities to improve its

    monitoring of suspicious transactions. Previous directives by regulators

    to improve oversight came in 2003 and in 2010.

    HSBC agreed to money laundering charges of $881 million.

    HSBC Holdings Plc agreed to pay $1.92 billion as penalty for various

    accusations of insufficient money laundering charges placed upon them

    by US authorities.

    The penalty includes $665 million civil penalties to regulators including

    to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve,

    and the Treasury Department.

    Bonuses would be delayed for top executives of the organization and

    would be removed from some current and former executives who had

    particular involvement in the wilful breach of U.S. regulations.

    HSBC agreed that it had neglected to maintain due diligence with some

    of their accountholders and agreed to strengthen their AML policy and

    monitor compliance to every step of KYC policy. More number of staff

    to be employed for monitoring every step.

  • Fin Connect Page 21

    It a

    in compliance of Bank Secrecy Act

    period of 5 years.

    Justice or Economy at large ?

    The judgment not to prosecute HSBC for such serious accusations and to

    avoid criminal proceedings in exchange of $1.92 billion fine leaves us

    with a question. Whether justice was delivered?

    It is true that this is not the first time that US authorities have warned

    HSBC regarding their insufficient AML policy. They have still not

    updated their framework to stop their channels from being used by

    money launderers. In this regard, they should have been given

    punishment more severe than penalty charges.

    On the o

    national economy of US would greatly suffer if justice would have been

    served and license to HSBC US would have been withdrawn by Office

    of Comptroller. All employees of HSBC US branch would suffer from

    unemployment which would ultimately tip the scale of inflation further.

    The judgement created outrage amongst mass. Many senators and

    advocates voiced their revulsion for this decision openly. The utilitarian

    view support the judgement as it provides greater benefit of the society

    at large. US government avoided retribution to protect the already

    struggling economy. Justice was served from the point of view of greater

    good. However this vulnerability has provided nothing but leeway to

    such banking giants. We can only hope that such incidents would not be

    repeated in the future and these monetary penalties would be enough to

    deter such organizations from using such inefficient AML policy.

  • Fin Connect Page 22

    REFERENCES

    www.google.co.in

    http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/hsbc-said-to-near-1-9-billion-

    settlement-over-money-laundering/?_r=2

    http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article38132.html

    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalbanking

    286.htm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSBC

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18880269

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/11/us-hsbc-probe-

    idUSBRE8BA05M20121211

    http://sevenpillarsinstitute.org/case-studies/hsbc-money-laundering-case-

    too-big-to-fail-does-not-mean-too-big-to-jail

    http://www.google.co.in/http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/hsbc-said-to-near-1-9-billion-settlement-over-money-laundering/?_r=2http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/hsbc-said-to-near-1-9-billion-settlement-over-money-laundering/?_r=2http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article38132.htmlhttp://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalbanking286.htmhttp://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalbanking286.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSBChttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18880269http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/11/us-hsbc-probe-idUSBRE8BA05M20121211http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/11/us-hsbc-probe-idUSBRE8BA05M20121211http://sevenpillarsinstitute.org/case-studies/hsbc-money-laundering-case-too-big-to-fail-does-not-mean-too-big-to-jailhttp://sevenpillarsinstitute.org/case-studies/hsbc-money-laundering-case-too-big-to-fail-does-not-mean-too-big-to-jail
  • Fin Connect Page 23

    An analysis of debt securities market in India

    By Hardeep Singh Chawla 9D

    (Scenario before 1993)

    The market for debt instruments remained under developed due to

    various constraints. Some of these are:

    Requirement of long term debt by corporate sector was provided

    by financial institutions and commercial banks in the form of term

    loans

    Restrictions on the interest rate payable on these instruments

    The principal buyers of debenture issued by companies were

    investment institutions. The institutions were bought with a view to

    hold them till maturity.

    (Scenario from 1993)

    The changes that enlightened the debt market since the middle of 1993.

    Debt market now poises for substantial growth due to following reasons:

  • Fin Connect Page 24

    Nowadays term loans are being provided lesser to industrial

    projects by financial institutions

    Now corporate enjoy complete independence in designing debt

    instruments

    These days there is no ceiling on interest rate

    To monitor the performance of various debt instruments various

    credit rating agencies have been established

    Volatilities present in equity markets has stimulated the investor to

    invest in debt securities

    Govt Securities Government Securities are securities issued by the Government for

    raising a public loan or as notified in the official Gazette. They consist

    of Government Promissory Notes, Bearer Bonds, Stocks or Bonds held

    in Bond Ledger Account. They may be in the form of Treasury Bills or

    Dated Government Securities.

    Features of Government Securities

    Issued at face value

    No default risk as the securities carry sovereign guarantee.

    Ample liquidity as the investor can sell the security in the secondary market

    Interest payment on a half yearly basis on face value

    No tax deducted at source

    Can be held in Demat form.

    Rate of interest and tenor of the security is fixed at the time of issuance and is not subject to change (unless intrinsic to the

    security like FRBs - Floating Rate Bonds).

    Redeemed at face value on maturity

    Maturity ranges from of 2-30 years.

  • Fin Connect Page 25

    The dated Government securities market in India has two segments:

    1. Primary Market: The Primary Market consists of the issuers of the securities, viz., Central and Sate Government and buyers include

    Commercial Banks, Primary Dealers, Financial Institutions,

    Insurance Companies & Co-operative Banks. RBI also has a scheme

    of non-competitive bidding for small investors.

    2. Secondary Market: The Secondary Market includes Commercial banks, Financial Institutions, Insurance Companies, Provident

    Funds, Trusts, Mutual Funds, Primary Dealers and Reserve Bank of

    India. Even Corporate and Individuals can invest in Government

    Securities. The eligibility criterion is specified in the relative

    Government notification.

    Auctions: Auctions for government securities are either multiple- price

    auctions or uniform price auction - either yield based or price based.

    G-Sec Auction details

    (Number of auctions)

    Year Uniform

    Price

    1 2010-

    11Q4

    15

    2 2011-

    12Q1

    30

    3 2011-

    12Q2

    34

    4 2011-

    12Q3

    37

    5 2011-

    12Q4

    39

  • Fin Connect Page 26

    6 2012-

    13Q1

    48

    7 2012-

    13Q3

    0

    8 2012-

    13Q4

    0

    9 2013-

    14Q1

    8

    Yield Based

    In this type of auction, RBI announces the issue size or notified amount

    and the tenor of the paper to be auctioned. The bidders submit bids in

    term of the yield at which they are ready to buy the security. If the Bid is

    more than the cut-off yield then its rejected otherwise it is accepted

    Price Based

    In this type of auction, RBI announces the issue size or notified amount

    and the tenor of the paper to be auctioned, as well as the coupon rate.

    The bidders submit bids in terms of the price. This method of auction is

    normally used in case of reissue of existing Government Securities. Bids

    at price lower, then the cut off price are rejected and bids higher, then

    the cut off price are accepted. Price Based auction leads to a better price

    discovery then the Yield based auction.

    Underwriting in Auction

    One day prior to the auction, bids are received from the Primary Dealers

    (PD) indicating the amount they are willing to underwrite and the fee

    expected. The auction committee of RBI then examines the bid on the

    basis of the market condition and takes a decision on the amount to be

    underwritten and the fee to be paid. In case of devolvement, the bids put

    in

    deciding the amount of devolvement and in case the auction is fully

    subscribed, the PD need not subscribe to the issue unless they have bid

  • Fin Connect Page 27

    for it.

    State Development Loans State Development Loans (SDLs) are issued by the State Governments

    and RBI coordinates the actual process of selling these securities. Each

    state is allowed to issue securities up to a certain limit each year.

    Generally, the coupon rates on State Development Loans are marginally

    higher than those of GOI-Secs issued for the same maturity.

    The State Development Loans are normally sold through the auction

    process. All the auctions are multiple price auctions, through

    competitive bidding, conducted by Reserve Bank of India and allotment

    procedure is similar to that for GOI-Secs. Non-competitive bidding has

    been introduced in the auction of SDL. State Development Loans also

    qualify for SLR status. Interest payment frequency is half yearly and

    other modalities are similar to GOI-Secs. They are issued in

    dematerialized form. State Government Securities can be issued in the

    physical form (in the form of Stock Certificate) on separate request and

    are transferable. Like in the case of G-Secs no stamp duty is payable on

    transfer of State Development Loans also.

    State Development Loans are eligible securities for Liquidity

    Adjustment Facility (LAF)-Repos. Schedule Commercial

    Bank(excluding RRBs) and Primary Dealers can offer State

    Development Loans as eligible securities to the RBI under LAF Repo

    Treasury bills

    Treasury Bills are short term (up to one year) borrowing instruments of

    the Government of India which enable investors to park their short term

    surplus funds while reducing their market risk.

    They are auctioned by Reserve Bank of India at regular intervals and

    issued at a discount to face value. On maturity the face value is paid

    to the holder.

  • Fin Connect Page 28

    The rate of discount and the corresponding issue prices are

    determined at each auction. When liquidity is tight in the economy,

    returns on Treasury Bills sometimes become even higher than

    returns on bank deposits of similar maturity.

    Any person in India including Individuals, Firms, Companies,

    Corporate bodies, Trusts and Institutions can purchase Treasury

    Bills. Treasury Bills are eligible securities for SLR purposes.

    Treasury Bills are available for a minimum amount of Rs. 25,000

    and in multiples of Rs. 25,000 thereafter. They are available in both

    Primary and Secondary Market.

    Treasury Bills are issued in the form of SGL - entries in the books of

    Reserve Bank of India to hold the securities on behalf of the holder.

    The SGL holdings can be transferred by issuing a SGL transfer form

    Treasury Bills are also being issued under the Market Stabilization

    Scheme (MSS)

    Type of Treasury Bills

    At present, RBI issues T-Bills for three different maturities:

    91 days

    182 days

    364 days.

    The 91 day T-Bills are issued on weekly auction basis while 182 day T-

    Bill auction is held on Wednesday preceding Non-reporting Friday and

    364 day T-Bill auction on Wednesday preceding the Reporting Friday

    Treasury Bills are Money Market instruments to finance the short term

    requirements of the Government of India. These are discounted

  • Fin Connect Page 29

    securities and thus are issued at a discount to face value. The return to

    the investor is the difference between the maturity value and issue price

    Treasury Bills or T-Bills as they are known are issued by the

    Government of India to meet their short-term requirement. T-Bills are

    issued for 91-day, 182-day and 364-day maturities. T-Bills are issued at

    a discount to their face value and redeemed at par.

    364-day T-Bills forms part of the government borrowing programme.

    There are three types of Treasury Bills:-

    91-day T-bill - maturity is in 91 days. Its auction is weekly on every

    Wednesday.

    182-day T-bill - maturity is in 182 days. Its auction is on every

    alternate Wednesday other than a reporting week.

    364-Day T-bill - maturity is in 364 days. Its auction is on every

    alternate Wednesday in a reporting week.

    Features of T-Bills auction

    All T-Bills auctions are Price-based.

    All T-Bills are auctioned on Multiple-Price basis.

    The RBI auctions 91-day T-Bills every Wednesday, 182-day T-Bills on

    every alternate Wednesday and 364-day T-Bills on the Wednesday of

    the reporting Friday week.

    A new segment called the wholesale debt market (WDM) was

    established at the NSE to report the trading volume of the Govt of India

    debt market.

    Trade volumes

  • Fin Connect Page 30

    Value (Rs crore)

    Year G-Sec SDL T-Bills

    2011-

    12Q1

    511027 7012 89055

    2011-

    12Q2

    774209 8136 96302

    2011-

    12Q3

    825093 13241 74675

    2011-

    12Q4

    990322 15824 87838

    2012-

    13Q1

    1155405 21143 116493

    2012-

    13Q2

    1335305 26026 162450

    2012-

    13Q3

    1175013 32694 120507

    2012-

    13Q4

    2254019 38103 150879

    2013-

    14Q1

    3655640 43834 161131

  • Fin Connect Page 31

    Share (%)

    Year G-Sec SDL T-Bills

    2011-

    12Q1

    84.2 1.2 14.7

    2011-

    12Q2

    88.1 0.9 11.0

    2011-

    12Q3

    90.4 1.5 8.2

    2011-

    12Q4

    90.5 1.4 8.0

    2012-

    13Q1

    89.4 1.6 9.0

    2012- 87.6 1.7 10.7

    0

    500000

    1000000

    1500000

    2000000

    2500000

    3000000

    3500000

    4000000

    G-Sec

    SDL

    T-Bills

  • Fin Connect Page 32

    13Q2

    2012-

    13Q3

    88.5 2.5 9.1

    2012-

    13Q4

    92.3 1.6 6.2

    2013-

    14Q1

    94.7 1.1 4.2

    Looking at the quarterly report it can be clearly seen that government

    securities continued to be market favorites compared to treasury bills

    and state development loans. However being short term securities these

    two securities were traded less. This clearly indicates the trust and

    confidence the investors have in government securities. They are ready

    to hold long positions in the market and are assured of the fact that their

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    G-Sec

    SDL

    T-Bills