fin connect vol i issue 2.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
-
Fin Connect Page 1
BMSB
FIN -CONNECT
EDITOR Bikramaditya Ghosh, Asst. Prof.
EDITORIAL COMMITTEE- DR.Umashanker K / Ms. GAYATRI BHAT, Asst. Prof.
/ Mr. B.V.RAO /Mr. Keshava Murthy
Strictly for Internal Circulation
VOL.1 ISSUE-2
May 2014
-
Fin Connect Page 2
Content
Editorial By Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh, Asst. Prof. Manipal
University P-3-3
USD Vs. EURO A comparative Study from INR perspective
By Tanya Singh 10A P-4-11
HSBC Scandal Case Study on Money Laundering
By Prapti Barman 9E P-12-21
An analysis of debt securities market in India
By Hardeep Singh Chawla 9D P-22-34
POVERTY An Economic Perspective
By Richa Prakash 9D P-34-43
Blog from a Senior Banker - Mr. Keshava Murthy P-44-49
-Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh, Asst.
Prof. Manipal University P-49-52
Disclaimer- This magazine does not reflect any views of either BOB or Manipal Group.
This is a pure research endeavor by budding managers of tomorrow.
-
Fin Connect Page 3
Editorial
It has been a dynamic & eventful journey to discover the latent
talent hidden within the student fraternity by virtue of enhancing
their ideas in BFSI domain. The enthusiasm & ideas have come out
so far has been quite impressive. This is our second issue, and with a
promise that many more to come after that, we in BMSB are proud
to show case the work done by our students once again.
I would like to thank our Director Dr. Thammaiah, our Assoc. Dean
Mr. Rahul Aradhya, our HOD Mr. Ramaprasad, our own moving
encyclopedia (Wikipedia) Mr. Keshava Murthy, our Banking
Partner Mr. Ashok Bhatnagar (BOB) and countless colleagues &
students in coming up with such an unique endevour.
The journey in Fin Connect has been as enjoyable as the final
outcome. I invite more & more such Articles to us from the entire
student fraternity. Come up & Show case your talent my friends.
1
1 Swami Vivekananda Vol-1 Pg. 342
-
Fin Connect Page 4
USD Vs. EURO A comparative Study from INR perspective
By Tanya Singh 10A
Introduction
Foreign Exchange market forms a very important part of a economy.
The foreign exchange market (Forex, FX, or currency market) is a global
decentralized market for the trading of currencies. The main participants
in this market are the larger international banks. Financial centers around
the world function as anchors of trading between a wide range of
different types of buyers and sellers around the clock, with the exception
of weekends. Electronic Broking Services (EBS) and Reuters 3000 Xtra
are two main interbank FX trading platforms. The foreign exchange
market determines the relative values of different currencies.
The foreign exchange market works through financial institutions, and it
operates on several levels. Behind the scenes banks turn to a smaller
actively involved
in large quantities of foreign exchange trading. Most foreign exchange
-
Fin Connect Page 5
dealers are banks, so this behind-the-scenes market is sometimes called
kinds of financial firms are involved. Trades between foreign exchange
dealers can be very large, involving hundreds of millions of dollars
Because of the sovereignty issue when involving two currencies, Forex
has little (if any) supervisory entity regulating its actions. A bank has to
have a sound Forex trading policy and at the same time it's important
for every banker to understand the basic idea of foreign exchange and
how our currency is linked to other currency or what is the major
relation between the important or top currencies. Now the Forex
segment of Bank of Baroda deals in majorly 6 currencies i.e.
Australian Dollar
Japanese Yen
US Dollar
Swiss Franc
Canadian Dollar
Euro
The article here tries to throw light on the relation between two of the
currencies mentioned above i.e. USD and EURO. The US$ being one of
the very important currency of the world in which not only majority of
trades take place world over but also it is considered as reserve currency.
Thus one would find that our Forex reserves are quoted in $ terms. Any
major change in US$ rates brings about a big impact in Indian economy
and many other economies. On the other hand Euro is the common
currency of whole of European zone or European countries which
include Germany, France, Austria etc. which are big countries. Thus
-
Fin Connect Page 6
establishing a relation between these currencies and their movements
would help us understand them better.
Calculation
As a part of the comparison here data was taken from past 3 years which
comprised of 622 observations each of US$ as well as Euro rate to see if
there exists a relation or not. For the same purpose the open, closing
position, last traded price, low, high positions were all taken into
account. Afterwards correlation and regression analysis have been
performed to assess the relationship between the two.
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R- 0.9539
R- 0 .9100
Adjusted R is 0.909
020406080
100
0 50 100 150
Y
Sample Percentile
Normal Probability Plot
-
Fin Connect Page 7
Interpretation
On the basis of the above linear regression model used we can make
the several interpretations which help is making us understand
whether does a relation between US$ and Euro currency exists and if
yes than how can it affect the exchange rates etc.
the regression analysis is basically used to establish relation that
how much change in independent variable can affect our
dependent variable
the R or R square tells about the forecasting of our regression
model i.e. it tells that it can correctly predict up to 91 % of
forecasting or variation in the level of USD due to change in the
EURO rate
this calculation has been made on the basis of 622 observations
which have been taken over the period of past 3years.
T Stat along with P Value teaches us that the phenomenon did not
happened by chance.
T Stat of +- 10 means the extreme ends of the distribution curve.
There if P Value is zero, that will signify that the distribution curve
do not have a long tail in either side.
On the contrary it has zero value in both the Tails, so the
distribution is concentrated straight & long.
-10
-5
0
5
0 20 40 60 80
Re
sid
ua
ls
X Variable 1
X Variable 1 Residual Plot
-
Fin Connect Page 8
This further means that confidence level of occurrence of that
event is very high.
So, the Null Hypothesis stands rejected.
Aside from factors such as interest rates and inflation, the exchange rate is one of the most important determinants of a
country's relative level of economic health. Exchange rates play a
vital role in a country's level of trade, which is critical to most
every free market economy in the world. For this reason, exchange
rates are among the most watched, analyzed and governmentally
manipulated economic measures. But exchange rates matter on a
smaller scale as well: they impact the real return of an investor's
portfolio. Here we look at some of the major forces behind
exchange rate movements.
Overview
Before we look at these forces, we should sketch out how
exchange rate movements affect a nation's trading relationships
with other nations. A higher currency makes a
country's exports more expensive and imports cheaper in foreign
markets; a lower currency makes a country's exports cheaper and
its imports more expensive in foreign markets. A higher exchange
rate can be expected to lower the country's balance of trade, while
a lower exchange rate would increase it.
Numerous factors determine exchange rates, and all are related to
the trading relationship between two countries. Remember,
exchange rates are relative, and are expressed as a comparison of
the currencies of two countries. The following are some of the
principal determinants of the exchange rate between two countries.
Note that these factors are in no particular order; like many aspects
of economics, the relative importance of these factors is subject to
much debate.
As a general rule, a country with a consistently lower inflation rate
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/interestrate.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/inflation.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/exchangerate.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/export.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/import.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bot.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currency.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/economics.asp -
Fin Connect Page 9
exhibits a rising currency value, as its purchasing power increases
relative to other currencies. During the last half of the twentieth
century, the countries with low inflation included Japan, Germany
and Switzerland, while the U.S. and Canada achieved low inflation
only later. Those countries with higher inflation typically see
depreciation in their currency in relation to the currencies of their
trading partners. This is also usually accompanied by higher
interest rates.
Interest rates, inflation and exchange rates are all highly correlated.
By manipulating interest rates, central banks exert influence over
both inflation and exchange rates, and changing interest rates
impact inflation and currency values. Higher interest rates offer
lenders in an economy a higher return relative to other countries.
Therefore, higher interest rates attract foreign capital and cause the
exchange rate to rise. The impact of higher interest rates is
mitigated, however, if inflation in the country is much higher than
in others, or if additional factors serve to drive the currency down.
The opposite relationship exists for decreasing interest rates - that
is, lower interest rates tend to decrease exchange rates.
The current account is the balance of trade between a country and
its trading partners, reflecting all payments between countries for
goods, services, interest and dividends. A deficit in the current
account shows the country is spending more on foreign trade than
it is earning, and that it is borrowing capital from foreign sources
to make up the deficit. In other words, the country requires more
foreign currency than it receives through sales of exports, and it
supplies more of its own currency than foreigners demand for its
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/centralbank.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currentaccount.asp -
Fin Connect Page 10
products. The excess demand for foreign currency lowers the
country's exchange rate until domestic goods and services are
cheap enough for foreigners, and foreign assets are too expensive
to generate sales for domestic interests.
Countries will engage in large-scale deficit financing to pay for
public sector projects and governmental funding. While such
activity stimulates the domestic economy, nations with large public
deficits and debts are less attractive to foreign investors. The
reason? A large debt encourages inflation, and if inflation is high,
the debt will be serviced and ultimately paid off with cheaper real
dollars in the future.
In the worst case scenario, a government may print money to pay
part of a large debt, but increasing the money supply inevitably
causes inflation. Moreover, if a government is not able to service
its deficit through domestic means (selling domestic bonds,
increasing the money supply), then it must increase the supply of
securities for sale to foreigners, thereby lowering their prices.
Finally, a large debt may prove worrisome to foreigners if they
believe the country risks defaulting on its obligations. Foreigners
will be less willing to own securities denominated in that currency
if the risk of default is great. For this reason, the country's debt
rating (as determined by Moody's or Standard & Poor's, for
example) is a crucial determinant.
A ratio comparing export prices to import prices, the terms of trade
is related to current accounts and the balance of payments. If the
price of a country's exports rises by a greater rate than that of its
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bond.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/default2.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sp.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bop.asp -
Fin Connect Page 11
imports, its terms of trade have favorably improved. Increasing
terms of trade shows greater demand for the country's exports.
This, in turn, results in rising revenues from exports, which
provides increased demand for the country's currency (and an
increase in the currency's value). If the price of exports rises by a
smaller rate than that of its imports, the currency's value will
decrease in relation to its trading partners.
Foreign investors inevitably seek out stable countries with strong
economic performance in which to invest their capital. A country
with such positive attributes will draw investment funds away from
other countries perceived to have more political and economic risk.
Political turmoil, for example, can cause a loss of confidence in a
currency and a movement of capital to the currencies of more
stable countries.
Conclusion
Our regression model above is able to portray a very accurate
picture more than 90% of times. The two exchange rates are very
strongly and positively correlated which can be construed as a
movement in one will result in strong positive movement in the
other currency too. Similarly the regression model explains us that
a movement/change in the independent variable i.e. Euro will
strongly affect dependent variable i.e. US Dollar in the similar
direction, i.e. if there is appreciation in the value of Euro then we
will see appreciation in the movement of USD too. Also if we will
plot the values on the normal distribution curve, it will be a
standard bell shaped curve with no tail as all the observations are
concentrated uniformly near the center.
-
Fin Connect Page 12
References
1. http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=INR
2. http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=EUR
3. http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=INR&to=EUR
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters_3000_Xtra
5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Broking_Services
6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency
HSBC Scandal Case Study on Money Laundering
By Prapti Barman 9E
What is Money Laundering?
legitimate
income so as to lose the trail of illegal transactions, it appears to be
http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=INRhttp://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=EURhttp://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=INR&to=EURhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters_3000_Xtrahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Broking_Serviceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency -
Fin Connect Page 13
white or legitimate money. Money laundering is a relative term and its
interpretation varies from situation to situation. For instance, in some
places tax evasion may be considered as a form of money laundering
while it may not be so in some other places. Basic process of money
laundering constitutes three different stages which are placing the
money in a legal channel; layering or camouflaging the money source
through series of complicated transactions and the final step is
integrating the funds acquired through illegal transactions. Further
elaboration on this topic is beyond the scope of this article. Money
laundering is a serious crime although it may appear that nobody is
victimized. As per recent statistics, it counts for over $500 billion
annually.
HSBC AML Policy
-
money laundering practice in all markets and jurisdictions in which it
operates and to comply with both specific provisions and the spirit of all
relevant laws and regulations. This
policy applies not only to money
laundering but also to terrorist
financing as mentioned in HSBC
Group Money Laundering
Deterrence Global Policy and
Principles. This policy reflects the
Money Laundering and 9 special recommendations to counter terrorist
financing. According to these recommendations that were published in
October 2004, any financial institution must maintain customer due
diligence and maintain record, monitoring and reporting of suspicious
-
Fin Connect Page 14
transactions, other measures to deter money laundering and terrorist
financing, regulation and supervision, etc.
HSBC Global policy has provisions
Key elements of the policy include:
a) Customer Due Diligence :
i) Obtaining and verifying identity of a prospective customer
using reliable, independent document/ electronic source
material. Steps to be taken to ensure no customer is using
fake identity.
ii) Appropriate KYC information (personal, business and
financial details and source of funds) before starting a
relationship. Proper risk analysis using all accounting and
other banking tools available.
b) Identification and Reporting of suspicious transactions :
Appropriate scrutiny and monitoring of transactions and account
activity of customers using a risk based approach with increased
suspicious activity noted by any business unit should be reported to
a Central Money Laundering Reporting Office Function who will
validate the suspicions and report to relevant authorities.
c) Maintaining records for at least 5 years after the relationship with
customer has ended or after the date of transaction as required by
local law or regulation.
d) Screening of payment against any sanctions/ lists issued by UN or
other competent local authorities.
-
Fin Connect Page 15
e) Training of all employees to ensure all of them are aware and
laundering deterrence.
Figure 1 : Five steps of HSBC Global Anti Money Laundering Policy
HSBC USA Money Laundering Events :
In 2005 Bloomberg Markets magazine accused HSBC of money-
laundering for drug dealers and state sponsors of terrorism. CEO
and wholly irresponsible
subsequent investigation indicated that the accusation was accurate
and proved that the bank was involved in money laundering
throughout Mexico.
HSBC Mexico which had inadequate money laundering controls,
shipped $7billion to HSBC US operations between 2007-08. Drug
traffickers used HSBC Mexico as conduit to ship US dollars from
Mexico to US thereby fooling the anti money laundering measures.
Evidence indicated bulk travellers cheque worth millions of dollars
and resistance to closing account linked to suspicious activities. The
bank categorized Mexico as low risk zone thereby weakening risk
monitoring policy. Mexican traffickers used boxes specifically
designed to the dimensions of an HSBC Mexico teller's window to
deposit cash on a daily basis.
Risk Assessment
of customers
Low Medium
- High
Obtaining
KYC
information
Transaction
monitoring
using risk
based
approach
Report of
suspicious
transaction
s
Maintaining
records
-
Fin Connect Page 16
Although it is prohibited by US laws to deal with individuals or
organizations deemed dangerous, HSBC US carried on about 28000
such sensitive transactions worth about $19.7 billion between 2001 -
07 majority of which involved Iran. Other countries were Libya,
Sudan, Cuba, Burma and Korea.
HSBC also had business tie up with Al Rajhi Bank, biggest financial
institution of Saudi Arabia. After suspected tie of US 9/11 terrorist
attack with Al Rajhi Bank, HSBC US cut off all ties with the bank
after 2001. But when Al Rajhi began to threaten to withdraw global
ties with HSBC, HSBC US resumed business transaction with the
bank after 2006.
Between 2005 and 2008, HSBC US cleared $290million worth of US dollar travellers' cheques which were being presented at a Japanese
bank. Further investigation proved that the origin of said transactions
were from Russia which is flagged as high risk zone in terms of
money laundering activities.
In 2008, the federal prosecutor in Wheeling, West Virginia, began investigating allegations that a local doctor used the bank to launder
money from Medicare fraud.
-
Fin Connect Page 17
-
Fin Connect Page 18
Permanent Subcommittee on Hearing HSBC Money laundering
Case
US Senate permanent Subcommittee started its investigation since
February 2012.
Location: Room 106, Dirksen Senate Office Building
Time: July 17, 2012 09:30AM
Members
CHAIRMAN - Carl Levin D
RANKING COMMITTEE
MEMBER - Tom Coburn R
David S. Cohen
Leigh H. Winchell
David Bagley
Paul Thurston
Michael Gallagher
Christopher Lok
Panel 1
Panel 2
Panel 3
Panel 4
Irene Dorner
Stuart A. Levey
Thomas J. Curry
Grace E. Dailey
Daniel P. Stipano
-
Fin Connect Page 19
Violations:
Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) by failing to maintain an effective anti-money
laundering program and to conduct appropriate due diligence on its
foreign correspondent account holders.
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the
Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) by illegally conducting transactions
on behalf of customers in Cuba, Iran, Libya, Sudan and Burma.
HSBC appeal:
Since 2009 it increased its investment in AML policy nine times and
also withdrew from various business transactions.
Paul Thurston, HSBC Chief of Retail and Wealth Management, said the
bank 'took wrongdoing seriously' and provided evidence for the same
Senate Report:
From 2001 to 2007, HSBC affiliates sent almost 25,000 transactions
involving Iran worth over $19billion (12billion) through HBUS and
other US accounts, while concealing any link with Iran in 85 per cent of
-called bearer share
accounts, in which ownership of shares and the income they incur can be
passed from person to person in secrecy.
In 2010, one disgusted top compliance official threw up his hands and
quit after less than a year on the job, according to the report.
At the heart of HSBC's failings was the fact that it served as a hub for
smaller financial firms needing access to the global banking system, the
report said.
-
Fin Connect Page 20
HSBC continued to do business with one client Sigue Corp that admitted
to U.S. law enforcement that it had failed to maintain an effective anti-
money laundering system.
Outcome:
Deferred Prosecution Agreement with US Department of Justice.
HSBC US Money laundering aftermath
The settlement is the third time in a decade that HSBC has been
penalized for lax controls and ordered by U.S. authorities to improve its
monitoring of suspicious transactions. Previous directives by regulators
to improve oversight came in 2003 and in 2010.
HSBC agreed to money laundering charges of $881 million.
HSBC Holdings Plc agreed to pay $1.92 billion as penalty for various
accusations of insufficient money laundering charges placed upon them
by US authorities.
The penalty includes $665 million civil penalties to regulators including
to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve,
and the Treasury Department.
Bonuses would be delayed for top executives of the organization and
would be removed from some current and former executives who had
particular involvement in the wilful breach of U.S. regulations.
HSBC agreed that it had neglected to maintain due diligence with some
of their accountholders and agreed to strengthen their AML policy and
monitor compliance to every step of KYC policy. More number of staff
to be employed for monitoring every step.
-
Fin Connect Page 21
It a
in compliance of Bank Secrecy Act
period of 5 years.
Justice or Economy at large ?
The judgment not to prosecute HSBC for such serious accusations and to
avoid criminal proceedings in exchange of $1.92 billion fine leaves us
with a question. Whether justice was delivered?
It is true that this is not the first time that US authorities have warned
HSBC regarding their insufficient AML policy. They have still not
updated their framework to stop their channels from being used by
money launderers. In this regard, they should have been given
punishment more severe than penalty charges.
On the o
national economy of US would greatly suffer if justice would have been
served and license to HSBC US would have been withdrawn by Office
of Comptroller. All employees of HSBC US branch would suffer from
unemployment which would ultimately tip the scale of inflation further.
The judgement created outrage amongst mass. Many senators and
advocates voiced their revulsion for this decision openly. The utilitarian
view support the judgement as it provides greater benefit of the society
at large. US government avoided retribution to protect the already
struggling economy. Justice was served from the point of view of greater
good. However this vulnerability has provided nothing but leeway to
such banking giants. We can only hope that such incidents would not be
repeated in the future and these monetary penalties would be enough to
deter such organizations from using such inefficient AML policy.
-
Fin Connect Page 22
REFERENCES
www.google.co.in
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/hsbc-said-to-near-1-9-billion-
settlement-over-money-laundering/?_r=2
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article38132.html
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalbanking
286.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18880269
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/11/us-hsbc-probe-
idUSBRE8BA05M20121211
http://sevenpillarsinstitute.org/case-studies/hsbc-money-laundering-case-
too-big-to-fail-does-not-mean-too-big-to-jail
http://www.google.co.in/http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/hsbc-said-to-near-1-9-billion-settlement-over-money-laundering/?_r=2http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/hsbc-said-to-near-1-9-billion-settlement-over-money-laundering/?_r=2http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article38132.htmlhttp://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalbanking286.htmhttp://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalbanking286.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSBChttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18880269http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/11/us-hsbc-probe-idUSBRE8BA05M20121211http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/11/us-hsbc-probe-idUSBRE8BA05M20121211http://sevenpillarsinstitute.org/case-studies/hsbc-money-laundering-case-too-big-to-fail-does-not-mean-too-big-to-jailhttp://sevenpillarsinstitute.org/case-studies/hsbc-money-laundering-case-too-big-to-fail-does-not-mean-too-big-to-jail -
Fin Connect Page 23
An analysis of debt securities market in India
By Hardeep Singh Chawla 9D
(Scenario before 1993)
The market for debt instruments remained under developed due to
various constraints. Some of these are:
Requirement of long term debt by corporate sector was provided
by financial institutions and commercial banks in the form of term
loans
Restrictions on the interest rate payable on these instruments
The principal buyers of debenture issued by companies were
investment institutions. The institutions were bought with a view to
hold them till maturity.
(Scenario from 1993)
The changes that enlightened the debt market since the middle of 1993.
Debt market now poises for substantial growth due to following reasons:
-
Fin Connect Page 24
Nowadays term loans are being provided lesser to industrial
projects by financial institutions
Now corporate enjoy complete independence in designing debt
instruments
These days there is no ceiling on interest rate
To monitor the performance of various debt instruments various
credit rating agencies have been established
Volatilities present in equity markets has stimulated the investor to
invest in debt securities
Govt Securities Government Securities are securities issued by the Government for
raising a public loan or as notified in the official Gazette. They consist
of Government Promissory Notes, Bearer Bonds, Stocks or Bonds held
in Bond Ledger Account. They may be in the form of Treasury Bills or
Dated Government Securities.
Features of Government Securities
Issued at face value
No default risk as the securities carry sovereign guarantee.
Ample liquidity as the investor can sell the security in the secondary market
Interest payment on a half yearly basis on face value
No tax deducted at source
Can be held in Demat form.
Rate of interest and tenor of the security is fixed at the time of issuance and is not subject to change (unless intrinsic to the
security like FRBs - Floating Rate Bonds).
Redeemed at face value on maturity
Maturity ranges from of 2-30 years.
-
Fin Connect Page 25
The dated Government securities market in India has two segments:
1. Primary Market: The Primary Market consists of the issuers of the securities, viz., Central and Sate Government and buyers include
Commercial Banks, Primary Dealers, Financial Institutions,
Insurance Companies & Co-operative Banks. RBI also has a scheme
of non-competitive bidding for small investors.
2. Secondary Market: The Secondary Market includes Commercial banks, Financial Institutions, Insurance Companies, Provident
Funds, Trusts, Mutual Funds, Primary Dealers and Reserve Bank of
India. Even Corporate and Individuals can invest in Government
Securities. The eligibility criterion is specified in the relative
Government notification.
Auctions: Auctions for government securities are either multiple- price
auctions or uniform price auction - either yield based or price based.
G-Sec Auction details
(Number of auctions)
Year Uniform
Price
1 2010-
11Q4
15
2 2011-
12Q1
30
3 2011-
12Q2
34
4 2011-
12Q3
37
5 2011-
12Q4
39
-
Fin Connect Page 26
6 2012-
13Q1
48
7 2012-
13Q3
0
8 2012-
13Q4
0
9 2013-
14Q1
8
Yield Based
In this type of auction, RBI announces the issue size or notified amount
and the tenor of the paper to be auctioned. The bidders submit bids in
term of the yield at which they are ready to buy the security. If the Bid is
more than the cut-off yield then its rejected otherwise it is accepted
Price Based
In this type of auction, RBI announces the issue size or notified amount
and the tenor of the paper to be auctioned, as well as the coupon rate.
The bidders submit bids in terms of the price. This method of auction is
normally used in case of reissue of existing Government Securities. Bids
at price lower, then the cut off price are rejected and bids higher, then
the cut off price are accepted. Price Based auction leads to a better price
discovery then the Yield based auction.
Underwriting in Auction
One day prior to the auction, bids are received from the Primary Dealers
(PD) indicating the amount they are willing to underwrite and the fee
expected. The auction committee of RBI then examines the bid on the
basis of the market condition and takes a decision on the amount to be
underwritten and the fee to be paid. In case of devolvement, the bids put
in
deciding the amount of devolvement and in case the auction is fully
subscribed, the PD need not subscribe to the issue unless they have bid
-
Fin Connect Page 27
for it.
State Development Loans State Development Loans (SDLs) are issued by the State Governments
and RBI coordinates the actual process of selling these securities. Each
state is allowed to issue securities up to a certain limit each year.
Generally, the coupon rates on State Development Loans are marginally
higher than those of GOI-Secs issued for the same maturity.
The State Development Loans are normally sold through the auction
process. All the auctions are multiple price auctions, through
competitive bidding, conducted by Reserve Bank of India and allotment
procedure is similar to that for GOI-Secs. Non-competitive bidding has
been introduced in the auction of SDL. State Development Loans also
qualify for SLR status. Interest payment frequency is half yearly and
other modalities are similar to GOI-Secs. They are issued in
dematerialized form. State Government Securities can be issued in the
physical form (in the form of Stock Certificate) on separate request and
are transferable. Like in the case of G-Secs no stamp duty is payable on
transfer of State Development Loans also.
State Development Loans are eligible securities for Liquidity
Adjustment Facility (LAF)-Repos. Schedule Commercial
Bank(excluding RRBs) and Primary Dealers can offer State
Development Loans as eligible securities to the RBI under LAF Repo
Treasury bills
Treasury Bills are short term (up to one year) borrowing instruments of
the Government of India which enable investors to park their short term
surplus funds while reducing their market risk.
They are auctioned by Reserve Bank of India at regular intervals and
issued at a discount to face value. On maturity the face value is paid
to the holder.
-
Fin Connect Page 28
The rate of discount and the corresponding issue prices are
determined at each auction. When liquidity is tight in the economy,
returns on Treasury Bills sometimes become even higher than
returns on bank deposits of similar maturity.
Any person in India including Individuals, Firms, Companies,
Corporate bodies, Trusts and Institutions can purchase Treasury
Bills. Treasury Bills are eligible securities for SLR purposes.
Treasury Bills are available for a minimum amount of Rs. 25,000
and in multiples of Rs. 25,000 thereafter. They are available in both
Primary and Secondary Market.
Treasury Bills are issued in the form of SGL - entries in the books of
Reserve Bank of India to hold the securities on behalf of the holder.
The SGL holdings can be transferred by issuing a SGL transfer form
Treasury Bills are also being issued under the Market Stabilization
Scheme (MSS)
Type of Treasury Bills
At present, RBI issues T-Bills for three different maturities:
91 days
182 days
364 days.
The 91 day T-Bills are issued on weekly auction basis while 182 day T-
Bill auction is held on Wednesday preceding Non-reporting Friday and
364 day T-Bill auction on Wednesday preceding the Reporting Friday
Treasury Bills are Money Market instruments to finance the short term
requirements of the Government of India. These are discounted
-
Fin Connect Page 29
securities and thus are issued at a discount to face value. The return to
the investor is the difference between the maturity value and issue price
Treasury Bills or T-Bills as they are known are issued by the
Government of India to meet their short-term requirement. T-Bills are
issued for 91-day, 182-day and 364-day maturities. T-Bills are issued at
a discount to their face value and redeemed at par.
364-day T-Bills forms part of the government borrowing programme.
There are three types of Treasury Bills:-
91-day T-bill - maturity is in 91 days. Its auction is weekly on every
Wednesday.
182-day T-bill - maturity is in 182 days. Its auction is on every
alternate Wednesday other than a reporting week.
364-Day T-bill - maturity is in 364 days. Its auction is on every
alternate Wednesday in a reporting week.
Features of T-Bills auction
All T-Bills auctions are Price-based.
All T-Bills are auctioned on Multiple-Price basis.
The RBI auctions 91-day T-Bills every Wednesday, 182-day T-Bills on
every alternate Wednesday and 364-day T-Bills on the Wednesday of
the reporting Friday week.
A new segment called the wholesale debt market (WDM) was
established at the NSE to report the trading volume of the Govt of India
debt market.
Trade volumes
-
Fin Connect Page 30
Value (Rs crore)
Year G-Sec SDL T-Bills
2011-
12Q1
511027 7012 89055
2011-
12Q2
774209 8136 96302
2011-
12Q3
825093 13241 74675
2011-
12Q4
990322 15824 87838
2012-
13Q1
1155405 21143 116493
2012-
13Q2
1335305 26026 162450
2012-
13Q3
1175013 32694 120507
2012-
13Q4
2254019 38103 150879
2013-
14Q1
3655640 43834 161131
-
Fin Connect Page 31
Share (%)
Year G-Sec SDL T-Bills
2011-
12Q1
84.2 1.2 14.7
2011-
12Q2
88.1 0.9 11.0
2011-
12Q3
90.4 1.5 8.2
2011-
12Q4
90.5 1.4 8.0
2012-
13Q1
89.4 1.6 9.0
2012- 87.6 1.7 10.7
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
3500000
4000000
G-Sec
SDL
T-Bills
-
Fin Connect Page 32
13Q2
2012-
13Q3
88.5 2.5 9.1
2012-
13Q4
92.3 1.6 6.2
2013-
14Q1
94.7 1.1 4.2
Looking at the quarterly report it can be clearly seen that government
securities continued to be market favorites compared to treasury bills
and state development loans. However being short term securities these
two securities were traded less. This clearly indicates the trust and
confidence the investors have in government securities. They are ready
to hold long positions in the market and are assured of the fact that their
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
G-Sec
SDL
T-Bills