filgrastim: no added benefit in infected diabetic foot ulcers

1
Inpharma 1380 - 29 Mar 2003 Filgrastim does not confer any added benefit in the treatment of patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers, report researchers from Austria. They randomised 37 patients with diabetes mellitus who had a moderate-sized infected neuropathic foot ulcer of Wagner grade 2 or 3 to receive SC filgrastim (n = 20) 5 µg/kg or placebo, once daily for up to 10 days in combination with in-hospital wound care and bed-rest. All of the patients received IV clindamycin and ciprofloxacin until inflammation subsided. At study end, cellulitis did not resolve any earlier among filgrastim, compared with placebo, recipients. Furthermore, improvements from baseline in the infection summary score were not significantly different between the two groups. However, ulcer volume was reduced from baseline by 59% among filgrastim recipients and by 35% among placebo recipients. The researchers suggest that factors other than filgrastim promoted the wound healing process. astenbauer T, et al. Evaluation of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (filgrastim) in infected diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetologia 46: 27-30, Jan 2003 800932794 1 Inpharma 29 Mar 2003 No. 1380 1173-8324/10/1380-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2010 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved

Post on 10-Dec-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Inpharma 1380 - 29 Mar 2003

■ Filgrastim does not confer any added benefit inthe treatment of patients with infected diabetic footulcers, report researchers from Austria. Theyrandomised 37 patients with diabetes mellitus whohad a moderate-sized infected neuropathic foot ulcerof Wagner grade 2 or 3 to receive SC filgrastim (n =20) 5 µg/kg or placebo, once daily for up to 10 days incombination with in-hospital wound care and bed-rest.All of the patients received IV clindamycin andciprofloxacin until inflammation subsided. At studyend, cellulitis did not resolve any earlier amongfilgrastim, compared with placebo, recipients.Furthermore, improvements from baseline in theinfection summary score were not significantlydifferent between the two groups. However, ulcervolume was reduced from baseline by 59% amongfilgrastim recipients and by 35% among placeborecipients. The researchers suggest that factors otherthan filgrastim promoted the wound healing process.Kastenbauer T, et al. Evaluation of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(filgrastim) in infected diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetologia 46: 27-30, Jan2003 800932794

1

Inpharma 29 Mar 2003 No. 13801173-8324/10/1380-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2010 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved