field measurement of running impacts team: chelsea wanta, amanda feest, matt kudek, nicole daehn,...
TRANSCRIPT
Field Measurement of Running ImpactsTeam: Chelsea Wanta, Amanda Feest, Matt Kudek, Nicole Daehn, Lindsey CarlsonBME 201March 9, 2007Client: Dr. Bryan Heiderscheit, PhD, PT Advisor: Paul Thompson
Overview
Problem Statement Background Design Requirements Proposed Designs Design Matrix Future Work Questions
Problem Statement
Design a portable system to measure tibial accelerations. This system would
incorporate the use of an accelerometer and a data logger.
Background
Tibial stress fractures One of the most serious running injuries
Tibia absorbs force of impact instead of muscle Greater forces on tibia may increase risk of stress fracture Knee contact angle also has an effect on severity of impact
Current Methods
Patient runs on a force plate in lab Accelerometer is directly connected to PC
Hard-wired through room This system requires extensive wiring Limited testing for different running
surfaces
Design Requirements
Portable system Lightweight accelerometer worn on leg
Uniaxial Measures up to 40G peak acceleration
Data logger Sampling rate of 1,000-2,000 Hz Multiple analog inputs Supply power to accelerometer(s)
Design should not affect runner’s gait Prototype completed for use this summer
Proposed Design #1: Wired Device
DescriptionData logger worn on belt Accelerometer wired to loggerData logger provides power to accelerometer
Proposed Design #1
Pros Reliable signal Only one power source needed Good design to evaluate feasibility of a portable
system
Cons Wires on leg may be bothersome Belt with logger may be bulky
Proposed Design #2: Wireless Device Description
Bluetooth communication between components
Data logger worn on beltSelf-powered accelerometer
Proposed Design #2
Pros No wires Potential to download directly to a PDA or watch
Cons Signal can be unreliable at times Increased weight of accelerometer Difficult to manufacture Belt with logger may be bulky
Proposed Design #3: Microcomputer Device
Description Entire device worn on leg Accelerometer attached to microcomputer
Microcomputer analyzes/stores data Downloads later to a PC
One power source for entire system
Accelerometer AmplifierAnalog to Digital
Converter Microcomputer
Proposed Design #3
Pros Compact device worn completely on leg Reliable signal One power source
Cons Not feasible within time constraints of course Requires advanced knowledge of circuits Unknown if device would alter runner’s gait
Design Matrix
Wired Wireless Microcomputer
Signal Reliability (40) 10 7 10
Feasibility (30) 10 6 3
Lightweight on leg (20)
9 7 6
Comfort (10) 6 7 8
Total (100) 94 61 69
Future Work
Finalize purchase of data loggerDecide on an accelerometer
Order components Construct prototype Testing Make adjustments, if necessary
Any Questions?
http://www.tekgear.com/index.cfm?pageID=90&prodid=227§ion=73&nodelist=1,73&function=viewproducts
www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=254
http://www.bluetooth.com/bluetooth/ http://www.pcb.com/searchresults.asp?
searchcriteria=352a24 http://www.mie-uk.com/datalogger/index.html
References