fem - rules for the design of hoisting appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

Upload: olegishchuk

Post on 02-Jun-2018

465 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    1/312

    FEDERATION EUROPEENNE DE LA

    MANUTENTION

    SECTION I

    HEAVY LIFTING APPLIANCES

    F.E.M.

    1.0013rdEDITION

    REVISED

    1998.10.01

    RULES FOR THE DESIGN OF

    HOISTING APPLIANCES

    B O O K L E T 1

    OBJECT AND SCOPE

    The total 3rd Edition revised comprises booklets 1 to 5 and 7 to 9Copyright by FEM Section I

    Also available in French and German

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    2/312

    Booklet 1

    OBJECT AND SCOPE

    1.1. PREFACE.............................................................................................................................. 2

    1.2. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 3

    1.3. OBJECT OF THE RULES..................................................................................................... 5

    1.4 SCOPE .................................................................................................................................. 6

    LIST OF SYMBOLS AND NOTATIONS .......................................................................................... 7

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    3/312

    1 - 2

    1.1. PREFACE

    The Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances set up by the Technical Committee of the Section Iof the F.E.M., which have been published so far in two Editions, the first one in 1962 and thesecond in 1970, have been increasingly widely used in many countries all over the world.

    Taking accourt of this enlarged audience, Section I of the FEM decided to change the format ofthese Design Rules and to facilitate updating by abandoning the single volume form and dividingthe work into a number of separate booklets as follows :

    Booklet 1 - Object and Scope

    Booklet 2 - Classification and loading on structures and mechanisms

    Booklet 3 - Calculating the stresses in the structure

    Booklet 4 - Checking for fatigue and choice of mechanism components

    Booklet 5 - Electrical equipment

    Booklet 6 - Stability and safety against movement by the wind

    Booklet 7 - Safety rules

    Booklet 8 - Test loads and tolerances

    Although not directly a part of these Design Rules, the opportunity is taken to draw attention to thenew Terminology of Section I.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    4/312

    1 - 3

    1.2. INTRODUCTION

    To facilitate the use of these Rules by the purchasers, manufacturers and safety organizationsconcerned, it is necessary to give some explanation in regard to the two following questions.

    1. How should these Rules be applied in practice to the different types of appliance whoseconstruction they cover ?

    2. How should a purchaser use these Rules to define this requirements in relation to anappliance which he desires to order and what conditions should he specify in this enquiry toensure that the manufacturers can submit a proposal in accordance with tris requirements ?

    1. It is necessary first to recognize the great variety of appliances covered by the Design Rules. Itis obvious that a crane having very high speeds and a rapid working cycle is not designed in thesame manner as a small overhead crane for infrequent duty. For such a machine there can beno question of making all the verifications which would appear to be required, from readingthrough the Rules, because one would clearly finish with a volume of calculations which wouldbe totally out of proportion to the objective in view. The manufacturer must therefore decide ineach particular case which parts of the machine, which he is designing, should be analysed andthose for which calculation is unnecessary, not because he must accept that the results for thelatter would not be in accordance with the requirements of the Rules, but because on thecontrary he is certain in advance that the calculations for the latter would only confirm afavourable outcome. This may be because a standard compornent is being used which hasbeen verified once and for all or because it has been established that some of the verificationsimposed by the Rules cannot in certain cases have an unfavourable result and therefore serveno purpose.

    If one takes, for exemple, the fatigue calculations, it is very easy to see that certain verificationsare unnecessary for appliances of light or moderate duty because they always lead to theconclusions that the most unfavourable cases are those resulting from checking safety inrelation to the elastic limit.

    These considerations show that calculations made in accordance with the Rules can take a verydifferent form according to the type of appliance which is being considered, and may in the caseof a simple machine or a machine embodying standard components be in the form of a briefsummary without prejudicing the compliance of the machine with the principles set out by theDesign Rules.

    2. As far as the second question is concerned, some explanation is first desirable for thepurchaser, who may be somewhat bewildered by the extent of the document and confusedwhen faced with the variety of choice which it presents, a variety which is, however, necessary ifone wishes to take account of the great diversity of problems to be resolved.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    5/312

    1 - 4

    In fact, the only important matter for the purchaser is to define the duty which he expects from hisappliance and if possible to give some indication of the duty of the various motions.

    As regards the service to be performed by the appliance, two factors must be specified, i.e. :

    - the class of utilization, as defined in 2.1.2.2 ;

    - the load spectrum, as defined in 2.1.2.3.

    In order to arrive at the number of hoisting cycles determining the class of utilization, the purchasermay, for instance, find the product of :

    - the number of hoisting cycles which the appliance will have to average each day on which it isused ;

    - the average number of days of use per year ;

    - the number of years after which the appliance may be considered as having to be replaced.

    Similarly, the load spectrum may be calculated by means of the simplified formula set out in theabove mentioned paragraph.

    In neither case do the calculations call for a high degree of accuracy, being more in the nature ofestimates than of precise calculations. Moreover, the numbers of hoisting cycles determining theclasses of utilization do not constitute guaranteed values : they are merely guide values, serving asa basis for the fatigue calculations and corresponding to an average life which can be expectedwith a reasonable degree of safety, provided the appliance, designed in accordance with thepresent design rules, is used under the conditions specified by the customer in his call for tenderand also that it is operated and maintained regularly in compliance with the manufacturer'sinstructions.

    If he is unable to determine the class of utilization and the load spectrum, the purchaser mayconfine himself to stating the group in which the appliance is to be classified. A guide as to thechoice of group is provided by Table 2.1.2.5., which is not binding but gives simple exempleswhich, by way of comparison, may facilitate selection.

    In the case of mecanisms, the following should also be specified :

    - the class of utilization, as specified in 2.1.3.2. :

    - the load spectrum, as defined in 2.1.3.3. :

    the same observation apply as were made concerning the appliance as a whole.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    6/312

    1 - 5

    The tables in Appendix A.2.1.1. may be used to facilitate determination of the class of utilization.On the basis of the class of utilization of the appliance, they make it possible to determine a totalnumber of working hours for the mechanism, according to the average duration of a working cycleand the ratio between the operating time of the mechanism and the duration of the complete cycle.

    Table T.2.1.3.5. may be used as a guide by a purchaser wishing simply to choose a group for each

    of the mechanisms with which the appliance he wants to order is to be fitted.

    As a general rule, the purchaser has no other information to supply in connection with the design ofthe appliance, except in certain cases :

    - the area of hoisted loads presented to the wind, if this area is larger than those defined in2.2.4.1.2. ;

    - the value of the out-of-service wind, where local conditions are considered to necessitatedesign for an out-of-service wind greater than that defined in 2.2.4.1.2.

    1.3. OBJECT OF THE RULES

    The purpose of these rules is to determine the loads and combinations of loads which must betaken into account when designing hoisting appliances, and also to establish the strength andstability conditions to be observed for the various load combinations.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    7/312

    1 - 6

    1.4 SCOPE

    The Rules apply to the design of lifting appliances or parts of lifting appliances which appear in theillustrated terminology for cranes and heavy lifting appliances of Section I of the FEM.

    Appliances not covered by Section I

    1) Lifting appliances included in Section V, for exemple :

    - mobile jib cranes on pneumatic or solid rubber tyres, crawler tracks, lorries, trailers andbrackets.

    2) Lifting equipment which according to the internal regulations of FEM, are included in Section IX,that is to say :

    - various items of series lifting equipment,

    - electric hoists,

    - pneumatic hoists,

    - accessories for lifting,

    - hand operated chain blocks,

    - elevating platforms, work platforms, dock levellers,

    - winches,

    - jacks, tripods, combined apparatus for pulling and lifting,

    - stacker cranes.

    For series lifting equipment, those chapters of the Design Rules of Section I which have beenaccepted by Section IX should be used.

    These rules comprise eight booklets. In addition some booklets contain appendices which give

    further information on the method of application.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    8/312

    1 - 7

    LIST OF SYMBOLS AND NOTATIONS

    Symbol Unit Dsignation Paragraphe

    A m2 Area exposed to wind 2.2.4.1.

    A - Combined influence of residual tensile stresses with dead weightstresses 3.1

    A1 A8 - Crane groups 2.1.2

    Ae m2 Enveloped area of lattice 2.2.4.1.4

    a mm Wheelbase of crane :Dimension of lattice in wind load calculation :Length of strip of plate in buckling calculation :Size of fillet weld in notch case 2.33

    2.2.2.32.2.4.1.4

    A-3.4T.A.3.6.-2.33

    a m/s2 Acceleration 5.8.3.1

    B - Influence of thickness of structural member 3.1.1.2

    B mm Width of lattice in wind load calculation 2.2.4.1.4

    B0 B10 - Classes of utilization of structural members 2.1.4.2

    b mm Breadth of section across wind front :Largest dimension of rectangular steel section :Length of plate in buckling calculation :Useful width of rail in wheel calculation

    2.2.4.1.43.1.1.2

    A-3.44.2.4.1

    C - Influence of cold :Coefficient used to calculate the tightening torque of bolts :Selection coefficient for choice of running steel wire ropes

    3.1.1.3A-3.2.2.2.2.34.2.2.1.3.1

    Cf - Shape coefficient in wind load calculation 2 2.4.1.4

    c, c' - Factors characterising the slope of Whler curves 4.1.3.5

    c1, c1max - Rotation speed coefficients for wheel calculation 4.2.4.1

    c2, c2max - Group coefficient for wheel calculation 4.2.4.1

    cos - Power factor 5.2.3.3.2

    D - Symbol used in plate inspection for lamination defects T.A.3.6

    D m Section diameter in shape factor determination 2.2.4.1.4

    D mm Rope winding diameter :Wheel diameter :Shaft diameter in fatigue verification of mechanism parts .

    4.2.3.14.2.4.1

    A-4.1.3

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    9/312

    1 - 8

    Dt mm Diameter of bolt holes 3.2.2.2.1

    d mm Depth of section parallel to wind direction in wind load calculation :Nominal diameter of bolt :Nominal diameter of rope :Shaft diameter in fatigue verification of mechanism parts

    2.2.4.1.4A-3.2 .2 .2 .34.2.2.1.3

    A-4.1.3

    d2 mm Bolt diameter at thread root 3.2.2.2.1

    dc - Number of completed starts per hour 5.8.1.4

    di - Number of impulses or incomplete starts per hour 5.8.1.4

    dmin mm Minimum rope diameter A-4.2.2

    dt mm Nominal bolt diameter 3.2.2.2.1

    E N/mm2 Elastic modulus of steel A-3.4

    E1 E8 - Groups of components 2.1.4.1

    ED % Duty factor 5.8.1.4

    e mm Thickness of strip of plate in buckling calculation :Thickness of plate in welded joints

    A-3.4T.A-3.6-2.31

    e1, e2 mm Plate thicknesses in welded joints A-3.4

    F N Wind force :Horizontal force during acceleration :

    Tensile load in bolts :Compressive force on member in crippling calculation

    2.2.4.1.2A-2.2.3

    3.2.2.2.2A-3.3

    F0 N Minimum breaking load of rope 4.2.2.1.2

    F1 N Permissible working load on bolts 3.2.2.2.1

    Fc N Projection of rope load on the x axis during travelling A-2.2.3

    Fcm N Inertia force due to the load during travelling A-2.2.3

    Fcmax N Maximum value of Fc A-2.2.3

    f - Fill factor of rope 4.2.2.1.3

    fcy Number of electrical brakings 5.8.1.4

    g m/s2 Acceleration due to gravity. according to ISO 9.80665 m/S2 A-2.2.3

    H - Coefficient depending on group for choice of rope drums andpulleys 4.2.3.1.1

    I kgm2 Moment of inertia of mass in slewing motion A-2.2.3.-3

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    10/312

    1 - 9

    I1, I2 mm4 Moment of inertia of stiffeners A-3.4

    ID A Starting current of motor 5.2.3.3.2

    IN A Nominal current of motor 5.2.3.3.1

    Itot A Sum of currents IAand IN 5.2.3.3.2

    IZ mm4 Moment of inertia of stiffeners A-3.4

    Ii kgm2 Moment of inertia of mass of a part in rotation A-2.2.3

    Im kgm2 Moment of inertia of mass of all parts in rotation A-2.2.3.-2.1

    JM kgm2 Moment of inertia of mass of motor and brake 5.8.1.4

    j - Group number in component groups E1 to E8 4.1.3.6

    j0 m/s2 Acceleration in horizontal motions A-2.2.3.-2.2

    jm m/s2 Average acceleration/deceleration in horizontal motions A - 2.2.3

    K - Empirical coefficient for determining minimum breaking strength ofrope 4.2.2.1.3

    K0 K4 - Stress concentration classes for welded parts A-3.6

    K2 - Coefficient for calculating force in the direction of the wind forlattice girders and towers 2.2.4.1.4.4

    KL N/mm2 Pressure of wheel on rail 4.2.4.2

    Km - Mn med / M max 4.2.1.2

    k - Spinning loss coefficient 4.2.2.1.3

    kc - Corrosion coefficient in fatigue verification of mechanism parts A-4.1.3

    kd - Size coefficient in fatigue verification of mechanism parts A-4.1.3

    km - Spectrum coefficient for mechanisms 2.1.3.3

    kp - Spectrum coefficient for cranes 2.1.2.3

    ks - Shape coefficient in fatigue verification of mechanism parts 4.1.3.3

    ksp - Spectrum coefficient for components 2.1.4.3

    ksp - Spectrum coefficient for mechanism parts 4.1.3.5

    ku - Surface finish (machining) coefficient in fatigue verification ofmechanism parts 4.1.3.3

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    11/312

    1 - 10

    KK - Buckling coefficients used in buckling calculations A-3.4

    L N Maximum permissible lifting force 5.8.2.1

    L1 L4 - Spectrum classes for mechanisms 2.1.3.3

    l m Length of suspension/length of load pendulum A-2.2.3.-2

    l m Equivalent length of fine 5.2.3.3.2

    l m Length of members in wind force calculations :Overall width or rail head

    2.2.4.1.4.14.2.4.1.2

    lk m Length of parts tightened in bolted joints 3.2.2.2.1

    M N.m External moment in bolted joints 3.2.2.2.2

    M1 M8 - Mechanism groups ; 2.1.3.1

    M1,M2, M3 - Motor torques required during a cycle of operations 5.8.1.3.1

    MF N.m Braking torque of motor 5.8.2.1

    MNmax N.m Maximum running torque required to lift the load 5.8.2.1

    Ma N.m Torque required to tighten bolts A-3.2.2.2.2.3

    MF N.m Bending moment in member in crippling calculation A-3.3

    Mmax N.m Maximum value of motor torque 5.8.2.1

    Mmed N.m Mean value of torque Mduring motor running time fiT 5.8.2.1

    Mmin N.m Minimum motor torque during starting 5.8.2.1

    m - Number of friction surfaces in bolted joints 3.2.2.2.2

    m kg Equivalent mass for calculating loads due to horizontal motions :Total mass of crane

    A-2.2.3.-1A-2.2.3.-2

    m0 kg Mass of crane without load A-2.2 .3.-1

    ml kg Mass of the load A-2.2 .3.-1

    mL kg Mass of the hook load 5.8 .3.1

    me kg Equivalent mass in calculation of loads due to horizontal motion A-2.2.3.-2.1

    m kg Load 2.1.2.3

    mlmax kg Safe working load 2.1.2.3

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    12/312

    1 - 11

    N - Number of hoisting cycles A-2.1.1

    N N Force perpendicular to joint plane in bolted joints 3.2.2.2.2

    NG - Ordinary quality in welding 3-57 $$$$$

    NM N Tensile force due to external moment in bolted joints 3.2.2.2.2

    n - Number of hoisting cycles :Number of stress cycles

    2.1.2.34.1.3.5

    n min-1 Nominal rotation speed of motors in rpm 5.8.1.4

    nmax - Number of hoisting cycles determining the total duration of use 2.1.2.3

    P N Load on wheel 4.2.4.2

    P1 P4 - Spectrum classes for components 2.1.4.3

    P10, P100 - Symbols indicating welding tests T.A-3.6

    PL N/mm2 Limiting pressure in wheel calculation 4.2.4.1

    PN W Nominal power of motor 5.8.1.4

    PNmax W Maximum power requirement of motor 5.8.2.1

    Pmoy I, II N Mean load on wheel in loading cases I and II 4.2.4.1

    Pmoy III N Mean load on wheel in loading case III 4.2.4.1

    Pmin I, II, III N Minimum load on wheel in loading cases I, II and III 4.2.4.1

    Pmax I, II,III N Maximum load on wheel in loading cases I, II and III 4.2.4.1

    Pmed kW Equivalent mean power 5.8.1.3.2

    p mm Span of crane 2.2.3.3

    pa mm Pitch of thread 3.2.2.2.1

    Q1 Q4 - Spectrum classes for cranes 2.1.2.3

    q - Correction factor for shape coefficient ks A-4.1.3

    q N/mm2 Dynamic pressure of the wind 2.2.4.1.1

    R0 N/mm2 Minimum ultimate tensile strength of the wire of a rope 4.2.2.1.3

    RE N/mm2 Apparent elastic limit Eaccording to ISO 3800/1 3.2.2.2.1

    r - Number of levers of loading :Ratio of stresses for large deformations

    2.1.3.33.5

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    13/312

    1 - 12

    r mm Radius of cylindrical shells in buckling calculations :Radius of rope groove :Radius of rail head :Blending radius

    A-3.44.2.3.24.2.4.1.2

    A-4.1.3

    r /km Ohmic resistance per unit length 5.3.2

    S N Stress :Maximum tensile force in rope

    2.1.3.34.2.2.1.1.2

    S m2 Area of all members of lattice girders and towers 2.2.4.1.4.4

    S mm2 Cross sectional area of conductor 5.2.3.3.2

    S1 mm Bearing diameter under bolt head 3.2.2.2.1

    SG N Load due to dead weight. constant load . 2.2.1 & 3.5

    SH N Load due to horizontal motions 2.2.3

    SL N Load due to working load 2.2.1

    SM N Load due to torques 2.5

    SMmoy N Mean type M load in bearing calculation 4.2.1.2

    SMmin N Minimum type M load in bearing calculation 4.2.1.2

    SMmax I N Maximum type M load in load case I 2.6.1.1

    SMmax II N Maximum type M load in load case II 2.6.2.1

    SMmax III N Maximum type M load in load case III 2.6.3.1

    SMA N Load due to acceleration or braking 2.5.1

    SMCmax N Load due to maximum motor torque 2.6.4.3

    SMF N Load due to frictional forces 2.5.1

    SMG N Load due to vertical displacement of moveable parts of a lifting

    appliance. excluding the working load 2.5.1

    SML N Load due to vertical displacement of the working load 2.5.1

    SMW N Load due to the effect of limiting wind for appliance in service2.5.1

    SMW 8 N Load due to wind effect for q - 80 N/mm2 2.6.2.1

    SMW 25 N Load due to wind effect for q - 250 N/m2 2.6.2.1

    SR N Load due to forces not reacted by torques 2.5

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    14/312

    1 - 13

    SRmax I N Maximum type R load in loading case I 2.6.1.1

    SRmax II N Maximum type R load in loading case II 2.6.2.1

    SRmax III N Maximum type R load in loading case III 2.6.3.1

    SRmin N Minimum type R load in bearing calculation 4.2.1.3

    SRmoy N Mean type R load in bearing calculation 4.2.1.3

    SRA N Load due to accelerations/decelerations 2.5.2

    SRG N Load due to self weight of crane parts 2.5.2

    SRL N Load due to working load 2.5.2

    SRW N Load due to wind 2.5.2

    SRWmax N Load due to out of service wind 2.5.2

    SRW25 N Wind load for q - 250 N/m2 2.6.2.2

    ST N Load due to buffer effect 2.3.3

    SV N Variable load when calculating structural members subject to largedeformations 3.5

    SW N Load due to in service wind 2.3.2

    SWmax N Load due to out of service wind 2.3.3

    Sb mm2 Root sectional area of bolt 3.2.2.2.1

    Seq mm2 Equivalent sectional area of tightened bolt 3.2.2.2.1

    Sp mm2 Area of members of lattice girders and towers 2.2.4.1.4.4

    s m Span of lifting appliance :Rail centres of crab :Distance between travel rails of lifting appliance

    8.2.2.18.2.2.48.2.3

    T h Total duration of use of lifting appliance 2.1.3.3

    T J Total kinetic energy in luffing motion A-2.2.3.-4

    T C Ambient temperature at place of erection 3.1.1.3

    T N Force parallel to joint plane in bolted joint3.2.2.2.2

    T s Duration of cycle 5.8.1.4

    T0 T9 - Classes of utilization of mechanisms 2.1.3.2

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    15/312

  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    16/312

    1 - 15

    x /km Reactance per unit length 5.3.2

    x m Coordinate of point of suspension of hoist rope along an axisparallel to the direction of travel 2.1

    x1 m Coordinate of position of centre of gravity of suspended load alongan axis having the same direction. sense and origin as the axis of

    x 2.1

    ZA - Assessing coefficient for influence A 3.1.1.1

    ZB - Assessing coefficient for influence B 3.1.1.2

    ZC - Assessing coefficient for influence C 3.1.1.3

    Zp - Minimum practical factor of safety for choice of steel wire ropes4.2.2.1

    z m Coordinate expressing horizontal displacement of load relative to

    crane A-2.2.3.-2.1

    zd m Displacement of load during travel motion of craneA-2.2.3.-2.2

    zm m Displacement of load during travel motion of craneA-2.2.3.-2.2

    - Ratio of sides of panel in buckling calculation T.A-3.4.1

    i - Ratio of duration of use of mechanism during a hoisting cycle toaverage duration of cycle A-2.1.1

    m Angle of inclination of rope during acceleration of crane

    A-2.2.3.-2.1 - Time coefficient relating to acceleration of crane

    A-2.2.3crit - Critical value of A-2.2.3.-2.2

    c - Amplifying coefficient of loading depending on crane group2.3

    m - Amplifying coefficient of loading depending on mechanism group2.6

    l1 mm Shortening of joined elements under the tightening force in boltedjoints 3.2.2.2.1

    l2 mm Extension of bolt under tightening force 3.2.2.2.1

    s mm Divergence in span of crane :Divergence in crane rail centres

    8.2.2.18.2.3

    b - Elastic coefficient of bolted joints 3.2.2.2.1

    - Shielding coefficient in calculation of wind force :Poisson's ratio :Overall efficiency of mechanism

    2.2.4.1.4.2A-3.45.8.3.1

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    17/312

    1 - 16

    Angle of wind relative to longitudinal axis of member 2.2.4.1.4.4

    , , - Safety coefficients applying to bolted joints 3.2.2.2.1

    - Ratio of the extreme stress values in fatigue calculation3.6

    m/mm Electric conductivity 5.2.3.3.2

    x, y, xy - Ratio of extreme individual stresses x, y , xyin fatiguecalculation A-3.6

    - Coefficient applied to horizontal forces in travel motions :Slenderness of column in crippling calculation

    2.2.3.3A-3.3

    - Mass constant in calculation of loads due to acceleration ofhorizontal motion :Coefficient of friction in threads :Coefficient of friction of contact surfaces in bolted joints

    A-2.2.3.-23.2.2.2.13.2.2.2.2.-3

    - Safety coefficient for critical stresses in structural members 3.Intro]

    - Dead weight coefficient in calculation of structural memberssubjected to significant deformation 3.5

    E - Safety coefficient for calculation of structural members dependingon case of loading 3.2.1.1

    R - Safety coefficient for calculation of mechanism parts depending oncase of loading 4.1.1.1

    T - = E, safety coefficient for calculation of bolted joints depending oncase of loading 3.2.2.2.2

    V - Safety coefficient for buckling 3.4

    K - Safety coefficient for verification of fatigue strength of mechanismparts 4.1.3.7

    - Experimentally determined coefficient depending on crane type forcalculating dynamic coefficient 2.2.2.1.1

    - Reducing coefficient applied to critical stresses in bucklingcalculation A-3.4

    1 - Coefficient used to determine the dynamic test load 2.3.3

    2 - Coefficient used to determine the static test load 2.3.3

    N/mm2 Calculated stress in structures in general 3.2.1.1

    0 N/mm2 Tensile stress for =0 in calculation of fatigue strength

    A-3.6

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    18/312

    1 - 17

    1 N/mm2 Working stress in the root section of bolts 3.2.2.1

    1 N/mm2 Equivalent stresses permissible for bolts 3.2.2.1

    +1 N/mm2

    Permissible tensile stress for =+1 in fatigue calculationA-3.6

    A N/mm2 Amplitude of the permissible maximum stress in bolts for fatigue

    calculations 3.2.2.1

    E N/mm2 Apparent elastic limit of steel 3.2.2.1

    G N/mm2 Tensile stress due to permanent load :

    Stress due to dead weight3.1.1.13.5

    R N/mm2 Ultimate tensile strength 3.2.2.1

    ER N/mm2 The EULER Stress A-3.4

    V N/mm2

    Stress due to variable loads 3.5

    a N/mm2 Permissible tensile stress for structural members :

    Permissible stress for mechanism parts3.1.1.14.1.1.1

    af N/mm2 Permissible normal stress for verification of fatigue strength of

    mechanism parts 4.1.3.7

    b N/mm2 Initial stress in calculating bolted joints 3.2.2.2.1

    bw N/mm2 Endurance limit of materials of mechanism parts under alternating

    bending 4.1.3.2

    c N/mm2 Permissible fatigue strength in compression for structural members

    :Calculated compressive stress for mechanism parts

    A-3.64.1.1.3

    cg N/mm2 Compression stress in wheel and rail 4.2.4.2

    cp N/mm2 Equivalent stress used in calculating structural members 3.2.1.3

    cr N/mm2 Critical stress used in calculating structural members subjected to

    large deformations 3.5

    vcr N/mm

    2 Critical buckling stress A-3.4

    vcr.c N/mm

    2 Critical comparison stress used in buckling calculation A-3.4

    d N/mm2 Endurance limit of materials of mechanism parts 4.1.3.4

    f N/mm2 Calculated bending stress in mechanism parts 4.1.1.3

    vi N/mm2 Ideal buckling stress for thin walled circular cylinders A-3.4

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    19/312

    1 - 18

    inf N/mm2 Lower stress in determination of stress spectrum 2.1.4.3

    k N/mm2 Fatigue strength of mechanism parts 4.1.3.6

    kx N/mm2 Fatigue strength for normal stresses in the x direction 4.1.3.7

    ky N/mm2 Fatigue strength for normal stresses in the y direction 4.1.3.7

    m N/mm2 Arithmetic mean of all upper and lower stresses during the total

    duration of use :Permissible stress in conformity tests to ISO 3600/1

    2.1.4.33.2.2.2.1

    max N/mm2 Maximum stress in fatigue calculation for structural members 3.6

    min N/mm2 Minimum stress in fatigue calculation for structural members 3.6.4

    n N/mm2 Bearing pressure in riveted joints 3.2.2.1

    p N/mm2 Theoretical tensile stress in bolt due to tightening 3.2.2.2.1

    sup N/mm2 Upper stress in determination of stress spectrum 2.1.4.3

    sup max N/mm2 Maximum upper stress in determination fostress spectrum 2.1.4.3

    sup min N/mm2 Minimum upper stress in determination of stress spectrum 2.1.4.3

    t N/mm2 Permissible tensile stress in fatigue verification of structural

    members :Calculated tensile stress in mechanism parts :

    Tensile stress in rope

    A-3.64.1.1.3

    A-4.2.2

    v N/mm2 Reduced buckling stress of thin walled circular cylinders A-3.4

    w N/mm2 Permissible stress in alternating tension/compression in fatigue

    verification of mechanism parts A-3.6

    wk N/mm2 Permissible alternating stress in fatigue verification of mechanism

    parts 4.1.1.3

    x N/mm2 Normal stress in the x direction when calculating structural

    members 3.2.1.3

    xa N/mm2 Permissible stress in fatigue verification of structural members A-3.6

    x max N/mm2 Maximum stress in fatigue verification of structural members A-3.6

    x min N/mm2 Minimum stress in fatigue verification of structural members A-3.6

    y N/mm2 Normal stress in the y direction when calculating structural

    members 3.2.1.3

    ya N/mm2 Permissible stress in fatigue verification of structural members A-3.6

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    20/312

    1 - 19

    y max N/mm2 Maximum stress in fatigue verification of structural members

    A-3.6

    y min N/mm2 Minimum stress in fatigue verification of structural members A-3.6

    N/mm2 Shear stress in general :Calculated shear stress for mechanism parts

    3.2.1.34.1.1.3

    a N/mm2 Permissible shear stress when calculating structural members 3.2.1.2

    af N/mm2 Permissible shear stress in fatigue verification of mechanism parts 4.1.3.7

    b N/mm2 Torsional stress in bolts due to tightening 3.2.2.2.1

    vcr N/mm2 Critical buckling shear stress A-3.4

    d N/mm2 Endurance limit of materials of mechanism parts 4.1.3.4

    k N/mm2 Fatigue strength of mechanism parts 4.1.3.6

    max N/mm2 Maximum shear stress in fatigue verification of mechanism parts 3.6.4

    min N/mm2 Minimum shear stress in fatigue verification of mechanism parts 3.6.4

    w N/mm2 Endurance limit under alternating shear of materials of mechanism

    parts 4.1.3.2

    wk N/mm2 Endurance limit under alternating shear in fatigue verification of

    mechanism parts 4.1.3.3

    xy N/mm2 Shear stress when calculating structural members 3.2.1.3

    xya N/mm2 Permissible shear stress in fatigue verification of structural

    members A-3.6

    xy max N/mm2 Maximum shear stress in fatigue verification of structural members A-3.6

    xy min N/mm2 Minimum shear stress in fatigue verification of structural members A-3.6

    , - Slope of Whler curve 4.1.3.5

    - Dynamic coefficient for hoist motion :Ratio of stresses at plate edges in buckling calculation

    2.2 .2.1.13.4

    h - Dynamic coefficient when calculating loads due to acceleration ofhorizontal motions A-2.2.3.-2

    - Tolerance factor in bolted joints 3.2.2.2.1

    - Crippling coefficient 3.3

    s-1 Angular velocity of shaft when calculating loads due to horizontal

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    21/312

    1 - 20

    motion A-2.2.3.-3

    1, 2, r s-1 Frequencies of oscillation during load swing A-2.2.3.-2.2

    m s-1 Angular velocity of motor A-2.2.3.-2.1

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    22/312

    FEDERATION EUROPEENNE DE LA

    MANUTENTION

    SECTION I

    HEAVY LIFTING APPLIANCES

    F.E.M.

    1.0013rdEDITION

    REVISED

    1998.10.01

    RULES FOR THE DESIGN OF

    HOISTING APPLIANCES

    B O O K L E T 2

    CLASSIFICATION AND LOADING

    ON STRUCTURES AND MECHANISMS

    The total 3rd Edition revised comprises booklets 1 to 5 and 7 to 9

    Copyright by FEM Section IAlso available in French and German

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    23/312

    Booklet 2

    CLASSIFICATION AND LOADING

    ON STRUCTURES AND MECHANISMS

    2.1 GROUP CLASSIFICATION OF HOISTING APPLIANCES AND THEIR COMPONENT PARTS.......................................................................................................................................................................4

    2.1.1. GENERAL PLAN OF CLASSIFICATION .................................................................................4

    2.1.2. CLASSIFICATION OF HOISTING APPLIANCES AS A WHOLE..........................................42.1.2.1. CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM...................................................................................................... 42.1.2.2. CLASSES OF UTILIZATION...................................................................................................... 42.1.2.3. LOAD SPECTRUM .................................................................................................................... 52.1.2.4. GROUP CLASSIFICATION OF HOISTING APPLIANCES............................................................ 72.1.2.5. GUIDANCE ON GROUP CLASSIFICATION OF AN APPLIANCE................................................. 7

    2.1.3. CLASSIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL MECHANISMS AS A WHOLE .....................................72.1.3.1. CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM...................................................................................................... 72.1.3.2. CLASSES OF UTILIZATION...................................................................................................... 9

    2.1.3.3. LOADING SPECTRUM............................................................................................................... 92.1.3.4. GROUP CLASSIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL MECHANISMS AS A WHOLE............................... 102.1.3.5. GUIDANCE FOR GROUP CLASSIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL MECHANISMS AS A WHOLE.... 10

    2.1.4. CLASSIFICATION OF COMPONENTS .................................................................................122.1.4.1. CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM.................................................................................................... 122.1.4.2. CLASSES OF UTILIZATION.................................................................................................... 122.1.4.3. STRESS SPECTRUM............................................................................................................... 132.1.4.4. GROUP CLASSIFICATION OF COMPONENTS ........................................................................ 14

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    24/312

    2 - 2

    2.2. LOADS ENTERING INTO THE DESIGN OF STRUCTURES..........................................................15

    2.2.1. PRINCIPAL LOADS...................................................................................................................15

    2.2.2. LOADS DUE TO VERTICAL MOTIONS..................................................................................162.2.2.1. LOADS DUE TO HOISTING OF THE WORKING LOAD............................................................. 16

    2.2.2.1.1. VALUES OF THE DYNAMIC COEFFICIENT ................................................................... 16

    2.2.2.2. LOADS DUE TO ACCELERATION (OR DECELERATION) OF THE HOISTING MOTION AND TOVERTICAL SHOCK LOADINGS WHEN TRAVELLING ALONG RAIL TRACKS ...................................... 172.2.2.3. SPECIAL CASE........................................................................................................................ 17

    2.2.3. LOADS DUE TO HORIZONTAL MOTIONS SH......................................................................192.2.3.1. HORIZONTAL EFFECTS DUE TO ACCELERATION (OR DECELERATION)........................ 19

    2.2.3.1.1. TRAVERSE AND TRAVEL MOTIONS.......... ........ ........ ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ..... 192.2.3.1.2. SLEWING AND LUFFING (DERRICKING) MOTIONS ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ . 20

    2.2.3.2. EFFECTS OF CENTRIFUGAL FORCE....................................................................................... 202.2.3.3. TRANSVERSE REACTIONS DUE TO ROLLING ACTION.......................................................... 212.2.3.4. BUFFER EFFECTS ST...............................................................................................................21

    2.2.3.4.1. BUFFER EFFECTS ON THE STRUCTURE ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ 212.2.3.4.2. BUFFER EFFECTS ON THE SUSPENDED LOAD ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ..... 22

    2.2.4. LOADS DUE TO CLIMATIC EFFECTS...................................................................................222.2.4.1 WIND ACTION........................................................................................................................... 22

    2.2.4.1.1. WIND PRESSURE......................................................................................................... 222.2.4.1.2. DESIGN WIND CONDITIONS............................................................................................ 23

    2.2.4.1.2.1. In-service wind ........ ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........ ........ ...... 232.2.4.1.2.2. Wind out of service ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ . 24

    2.2.4.1.3. WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS........................................................................................... 252.2.4.1.4. SHAPE COEFFICIENTS.................................................................................................... 25

    2.2.4.1.4.1. Individual members, frames, etc......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ........ ........ ....... 252.2.4.1.4.2. Multiple frames of members : shielding factors...... .... .... .... .... ... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... .... .... .... .... .. 282.2.4.1.4.3. Lattice towers..................................................................................................................292.2.4.1.4.4. Parts inclined in relation to the wind direction ....... ........ ........ ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ....... 29

    2.2.4.2. SNOW LOAD........................................................................................................................... 30

    2.2.4.3. TEMPERATURE VARIATIONS.................................................................................................. 30

    2.2.5 MISCELLANEOUS LOADS.......................................................................................................302.2.5.1. LOADS CARRIED BY PLATFORMS......................................................................................... 30

    2.3. CASES OF LOADING........................................................................................................................31

    2.3.1. CASE I : APPLIANCE WORKING WITHOUT WIND.............................................................31

    2.3.2. CASE II : APPLIANCE WORKING WITH WIND ....................................................................31

    2.3.3. CASE III : APPLIANCE SUBJECTED TO EXCEPTIONAL LOADINGS .............................32

    2.3.4. CHOOSING THE AMPLIFYING COEFFICIENT C

    ...............................................................33

    2.4. SEISMIC EFFECTS ............................................................................................................................33

    2.5. LOADS ENTERING INTO THE DESIGN OF MECHANISMS..........................................................34

    2.5.1. TYPE SM LOADS........................................................................................................................34

    2.5.2. TYPE SRLOADS........................................................................................................................34

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    25/312

    2 - 3

    2.6. CASES OF LOADING........................................................................................................................35

    2.6.1. CASE I - NORMAL SERVICE WITHOUT WIND....................................................................352.6.1.1. TYPE SM LOADS..................................................................................................................... 352.6.1.2. TYPE SRLOADS ..................................................................................................................... 35

    2.6.2. CASE II - NORMAL SERVICE WITH WIND ...........................................................................362.6.2.1. TYPE SM LOADS..................................................................................................................... 362.6.2.2. TYPE SRLOADS ..................................................................................................................... 36

    2.6.3. CASE III - EXCEPTIONAL LOADS ..........................................................................................372.6.3.1. TYPE SM LOADS..................................................................................................................... 372.6.3.2. TYPE SRLOADS ..................................................................................................................... 37

    2.6.4. APPLICATION OF THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS FOR CALCULATING SM ..............372.6.4.1. HOISTING MOTIONS................................................................................................................ 382.6.4.2. HORIZONTAL MOTIONS.......................................................................................................... 382.6.4.3. COMBINED MOTIONS .............................................................................................................. 39

    .....................................................................................................................................................................39

    APPENDIX..................................................................................................................................................40

    A.2.1.1. - HARMONISATION OF THE CLASSES OF UTILIZATION OF APPLIANCES ANDMECHANISMS.......................................................................................................................................40

    A.2.2.3. - CALCULATION OF LOADS DUE TO ACCELERATIONS OF HORIZONTAL MOTIONS.................................................................................................................................................................45

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    26/312

    2 - 4

    2.1 GROUP CLASSIFICATION OF HOISTING APPLIANCESAND THEIR COMPONENT PARTS

    2.1.1. GENERAL PLAN OF CLASSIFICATION

    In the design of a hoisting appliance and its component parts, account must be taken of the dutywhich they will be required to perform during their duration of use ; for this purpose groupclassification is employed of :

    - the appliance as a whole ;

    - the individual mechanisms as a whole ;

    - the structural and mechanical components.

    This classification is based on two criteria, namely :

    - the total duration of use of the item considered ;

    - the hook load, loading or stress spectra to which the item is subjected.

    2.1.2. CLASSIFICATION OF HOISTING APPLIANCES AS A WHOLE

    2.1.2.1. CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

    Appliances as a whole are classified in eight groups, designated by the symbol A1, A2, ..., A8respectively (see section 2.1.2.4.), on the basis of ten classes of utilization and four load spectra.

    2.1.2.2. CLASSES OF UTILIZATION

    By duration of use of a hoisting appliance is meant the number of hoisting cycles which theappliance performs. A hoisting cycle is the entire sequence of operations commencing when a

    load is hoisted and ending at the moment when the appliance is ready to hoist the next load.

    The total duration of use is a computed duration of use, considered as a guide value,commencing when the appliance is put into service and ending when it is finally taken out ofservice.

    On the basis of the total duration of use, we have ten classes of utilization, designated by thesymbol U0, U1, ..., U9. They are defined in table T.2.1.2.2.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    27/312

    2 - 5

    Table T.2.1.2.2. - Classes of utilization

    SymbolTotal duration of use

    (number nmaxof hoisting cycles)

    U0U1

    U2U3U4U5U6U7U8U9

    16 000

    32 00063 000

    125 000250 000500 000

    1 000 0002 000 0004 000 000

    50

    Rolled sections [ ]

    Rectangular hollowsections up to356 mm square

    and 254 x 457 mmrectangular

    1,15

    1,4

    1,05

    1,15

    1,45

    1,05

    1,3

    1,5

    1,2

    1,4

    1,55

    1,3

    1,45

    1,55

    1,4

    1,5

    1,55

    1,5

    1,6

    1,6

    1,6

    Other sections 1,30 1,35 1,60 1,65 1,70 1,80 1,80

    Individualmembers

    Circular sections where :

    D.Vs < 6 m2/s

    D.Vs 6 m2

    /s

    0,60

    0,60

    0,70

    0,65

    0,80

    0,70

    0,85

    0,70

    0,90

    0,75

    0,90

    0,80

    0,90

    0,80Rectangularhollow sectionsover 356 mmsquare and254 x 457 mmrectangular

    Wind

    b/d21

    0,50,25

    1,551,401,00,80

    1,751,551,200,90

    1,951,751,300,90

    2,101,851,351,0

    2,201,901,401,0

    Flat-sided sections 1,70

    Singlelatticeframes

    Circular sections where :

    D.Vs < 6 m2/sD.Vs 6 m2/s

    1,100.80

    Machineryhousesetc.

    Rectangular cladstructures on groundor solid base

    1,10

    (1) See figure 2.2.4.1.4.1.

    b

    d

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    50/312

    2 - 28

    (I) Aerodynamic slenderness :( length of member ) / ( breadth of section across wind front ) = l/b * or l/D *

    * In lattice construction the lengths of individual members are taken between the centres ofadjacent node points. See diagram below

    (II) Solidity ratio : (area of solid parts) / (enclosed area) = A /Ae=1

    n

    [(li . bi)/(L . B)]

    (III) Spacing ratio :(distance between facing sides) / (breadth of members across wind front ) = a/b or a/B

    for "a" take the smallest possible value in the geometry of the exposed face.

    (IV) Section ratio :

    (breadth of section across wind front) / (depth of section parallel to wind flow)= b/d

    Figure 2.2.4.1.4.1. - Definitions : Aerodynamic Slenderness, Solidity Ratio,Spacing Ratio, and Section Ratio

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    51/312

    2 - 29

    2.2.4.1.4.2. Multiple frames of members : shielding factors

    Where parallel frames or members are positioned so that shielding takes place, the wind loadson the windward frame or member and on the unsheltered parts of those behind it are calculatedusing the appropriate shape coefficients. The wind load on the sheltered parts is multiplied by a

    shielding factor given in table T.2.2.4.1.4.2. Values of vary with the solidity and spacing ratiosas defined in figure 2.2.4.1.4.1.

    Table T.2.2.4.1.4.2. - Shielding coefficients

    Spacing ratio Solidity ratio A/Aea/b 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6

    0,51,02,0

    4,05,06,0

    0,750,920,95

    1,01,01,0

    0,400,750,80

    0,880,951,0

    0,320,590,63

    0,760,881,0

    0,210,430,50

    0,660,811,0

    0,150,250,33

    0,550,751,0

    0,100,100,20

    0,450,681,0

    Where a number of identical frames or members are spaced equidistantly behind each other insuch a way that each frame shields those behind it, the shielding effect is assumed to increaseup to the ninth frame and to remain constant thereafter.The wind loads are calculated as follows :

    On the 1st. frame F1= A.q.Cf in N

    On the 2nd. frame F2= .A.q.Cf in N

    On the n.th frame Fn= (n-1)

    .A.q.Cf(where n is from 3 to 8) in N

    On the 9th and subsequent F9= 8.A.q.Cf in N

    frames

    The total wind load is thus :

    Where there are up to 9 frames Ftotal = [1 + + 2+ 3+ .... + (n-1)].A.q.Cf

    = [(1 - n) / (1 - )].A.q.Cf in N

    Where there are more than Ftotal= [1 + + 2+

    3+ .... + n

    8+ (- 9)

    8].A.q.Cf

    9 frames = [(1 - 9) / (1 - ) + (n - 9)

    8].A.q.Cf in N

    Note - The term xused in the above formula is assumed to have a longer limit of 0.10. It is taken

    as 0.10 whenever x< 0.10.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    52/312

    2 - 30

    2.2.4.1.4.3. Lattice towers

    In calculating the "face-on" wind load on square towers, in the absence of a detailed calculation,the solid area of the windward face is multiplied by the following overall force coefficient :

    For towers composed of flat sided sections 1,7 (1 + )

    For towers composed of circular sectionswhere D.Vs< 6 m

    2/s 1,1 (1 + )

    where D.Vs 6 m2/s 1,4

    The value of is taken from table 2.2.4.1.4.2. for a/b = 1 according to the solidity ratio of the

    windward face.

    The maximum wind load on a square tower occurs when the wind blows on to a corner. In theabsence of a detailed calculation, this load can be considered as 1.2 times that developed with"face-on" wind on one side.

    2.2.4.1.4.4. Parts inclined in relation to the wind direction

    Individual members. frames, etc.

    Where the wind blows at an angle to the longitudinal axis of a member or to the surface of aframe, the wind load in the direction of the wind is obtained from :

    F = A.q.Cfsin2 in N

    where F, A, q and Cfare as defined in 2.2.4.1.3.

    and is the angle of the wind (< 90) to the longitudinal axis or face.

    Lattice trusses and towers

    Where the wind blows at an angle to the longitudinal axis of a lattice truss or tower, the wind loadin the direction of the wind is obtained from :

    F = A.q.Cf.K2 in Nwhere :

    F, A, q and Cfare as defined in 2.2.4.1.3. and K2= / [50 (1,7 - Sp/S)]

    which cannot be less than 0,35 or greater than 1.

    is the angle of the wind in degrees (< 90) to the longitudinal axis of the truss or tower.

    Spis the area in m2of the bracing members of the truss or tower projected on to its windward

    plane.

    S is the area in m2of all (bracing and main) members of the truss or tower projected on to its

    windward plane.

    The value of K2is assumed to have lower and upper limits of 0.35 and 1.0 respectively. It is takenas 0.35 whenever the calculated value < 0.35 and as 1.0 whenever the calculated value > 1.0.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    53/312

    2 - 31

    2.2.4.2. SNOW LOAD

    Snow loads shall be neglected in the design calculations for overhead travelling cranes, bridgecranes and jib cranes.

    2.2.4.3. TEMPERATURE VARIATIONS

    Stresses due to temperature variations shall be considered only in special cases such as whenmembers are not free to expand.

    In such cases, the maximum temperature fluctuation shall be taken to be :- 20 C to + 45 C.

    2.2.5 MISCELLANEOUS LOADS

    2.2.5.1. LOADS CARRIED BY PLATFORMS

    Access gangways, driver 's cabine and platforms shall be designed to carry the followingconcentrated loads :

    3000 N for maintenance gangways and platforms where materials may be placed,

    1500 N for gangways and platforms intended only for access of personnel,

    300 N as the horizontal force which may be exerted on handrails and toe-guards.

    These loads are not to be used in the calculations for girders.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    54/312

    2 - 32

    2.3. CASES OF LOADING

    Three different cases of loading are to be considered for the purpose of the calculations :

    - the working case without wind,

    - the working case with limiting working wind,

    - the case of exceptional loadings.

    Having determined the various loads in accordance with section 2.2, account is taken of a certainprobability of exceeding the calculated stress, which results from imperfect methods of

    calculation and unforeseen contingencies, by applying an amplifying coefficient C, which varies

    according to the group classification of the appliance.

    The values of this coefficient Care indicated in clause 2.3.4.

    2.3.1. CASE I : APPLIANCE WORKING WITHOUT WIND

    The following shall be taken into consideration : the static loads due to the dead weight SG, the

    loads due to the working load SLmultiplied by the dynamic coefficient , and the two most

    unfavourable horizontal effects SHamong those defined in clause 2.2.3., excluding buffer forces.

    All these loads must then be multiplied by the amplifying coefficient Cspecified in clause 2.3.4.,

    viz :

    C(SG+SL+ SH)

    In cases where travel motion takes place only for positioning the appliance and is not normallyused for moving loads the effect of this motion shall not be combined with another horizontalmotion. This is the case for example with a dockside crane which, once it has been positioned,handles a series of loads at a fixed point.

    2.3.2. CASE II : APPLIANCE WORKING WITH WIND

    The loads of case I are taken to which are added the effects of the limiting working wind SW

    defined under 2.2.4.1.2.1. (table T.2.2.4.1.2.1.) and, where, applicable the load due totemperature variation, viz :

    C(SG+ SL+ SH) + SW

    Note - The dynamic effects of acceleration and retardation do not have the same values in case IIas in case I, for when a wind is blowing the accelerating or braking times are not the same aswhen still conditions prevail.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    55/312

    2 - 33

    2.3.3. CASE III : APPLIANCE SUBJECTED TO EXCEPTIONAL LOADINGS

    Exceptional loadings occur in the following cases :

    - appliance out of service with maximum wind

    - appliance working and subjected to a buffer effect- appliance undergoing the tests indicated in booklet 8.

    The highest of the following combinations shall be considered :

    a) The loads SGdue to the dead weight, plus the load Sw maxdue to the maximum wind asmentioned under clause 2.2.4.1.2.2. (including the reactions of the anchorages)

    b) the loads SGdue to the dead weight and SLdue to the working load plus the greatest buffereffect STas envisaged in clause 2.2.3.4.

    c) the loads SGdue to the dead weight plus the highest of the two loads 1SLand 2SL; 1

    and 2being the coefficients by which the safe working load is multiplied for the dynamic

    test (1) and for the static test (2) as in clauses 8.1.1. and 8.1.2.

    These three cases are expressed by the formulae :a) SG+ Sw maxb) SG+ SL+ ST

    9

    c) SG+1SL or SG+ 2SL

    Note 1 - It should be noted that the checks under (c) are only to be made in cases where the

    working load, when assumed to act alone, produces stresses opposed in direction to thosecaused by the dead weight up to the point at which the static test load does not exceed 1,5 timesthe safe working load.

    Note 2 - When using decelerating devices in advance of buffer impact under the conditionsmentioned in clause 2.2.3.4.1. STwill be taken to be the highest load resulting either from theretardation previously caused by the decelerating device or from that finally caused by the buffer.

    9Loadings resulting from the working load are taken into account but the effects of load swing

    resulting from the stock are neglected because this swing only loads the structure when theother effects have been practically absorbed. This comment does not apply to rigidly guide loadswhich cannot swing.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    56/312

    2 - 34

    2.3.4. CHOOSING THE AMPLIFYING COEFFICIENT C

    The value of the amplifying coefficient c depends upon the group classification of the appliance.

    Table T.2.3.4. - Values of amplifying coefficient C

    Appliancegroup A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

    c 1,00 1,02 1,05 1,08 1,11 1,14 1,17 1,20

    2.4. SEISMIC EFFECTS

    In general the structures of lifting appliances do not have to be checked for European seismiceffects.

    However, if official regulations or particular specifications so prescribe, special rules orrecommendations can be applied in areas subject to earthquakes.

    This requirement shall be advised to the supplier by the user of the installation who shall alsoprovide the corresponding seismic spectra.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    57/312

    2 - 35

    2.5. LOADS ENTERING INTO THE DESIGN OF MECHANISMS

    Mechanisms are subjected to two kinds of loading :

    a) The loads, represented by the symbol SM, which are directly dependent upon the torques

    exerted on the mechanisms by the motors or the brakes.

    b) The loads, represented by the symbol SR, which are independent of motor or brake actionbut which are determined by the reactions which act upon the mechanical parts and whichare not balanced by a torque acting on the drive shafts

    10.

    2.5.1. TYPE SM LOADS

    The loads of this type to be considered are :

    a) SMGloads, corresponding to a vertical displacement of the centre of gravity of moving partsof the appliance other than the working load.

    b) SMLloads, corresponding to a vertical displacement of the working load as defined inclause 2.2. for structures.

    c) SMFloads, corresponding to frictional forces which have not been allowed for in calculatingthe efficiency of the mechanism (see clause 4.2.6.1.1., booklet 4).

    d) SMAloads, associated with acceleration (or braking) of the motion.

    e) SMWloads, corresponding to the effect of the working wind assumed for the appliance.

    2.5.2. TYPE SRLOADS

    The loads of this type to be considered are :

    a) SRGloads due to the weights of components which act on the part under consideration ;b) SRLloads due to the working load as defined in clause 2.2., for structures.c) SRAloads due to the accelerations or decelerations of the various motions of the

    appliance or its parts, as calculated according to clause 2. 2.3.1. for structures, insofar as

    the order of magnitude of these loads is not negligible compared to the SRGand SRLloads.d) SRWloads due to the limiting working wind SWor to the maximum wind SW max(see clause

    2.2.4.1.), insofar as the order of magnitude of these loads is not negligible.

    10

    In a travel motion, for instance, the loads due to the vertical reaction on the rail wheels and thetransverse loads that stress the wheel axle but are not transmitted to the components of thedriving mechanism.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    58/312

    2 - 36

    2.6. CASES OF LOADINGThree cases of loading are to be considered in the calculations :

    Case I : Normal service without windCase II : Normal service with wind

    Case III : Exceptional loadings.

    A maximum load must be determined for each case of loading which serves as the basis for thecalculations.

    Note - Clearly, case I and II are one and the same in the case of appliances which are notexposed to wind.

    The various loadings being determined as indicated in paragraph 2.5., account is taken of acertain probability of exceeding the calculated stress, which results from imperfect methods of

    calculation and unforeseen contingencies, by applying an amplifying coefficient mdepending onthe group in which the mechanism is classified. The values of this coefficient mare indicated in

    table T.2.6.

    Table T.2.6. - Values of amplifying coefficient m

    Mechanismgroup M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8

    m 1,00 1,04 1,08 1,12 1,16 1,20 1,25 1,30

    2.6.1. CASE I - NORMAL SERVICE WITHOUT WIND

    2.6.1.1. TYPE SMLOADS

    The maximum load SM max Iof the SMtype (see clause 2.5.) is determined by combining the loadsSMG, SML, SMF, and SMAdefined in clause 2.5.1. which can be expressed by the relation :

    SM max I= ( SMG+ SML + SMF+ SMA ) m

    Note - It must be pointed out that it is not the combination of the maximum values of each of theterms in this relation that must be considered, but the value resulting from the most unfavourable

    combination that could actually occur in practice.

    2.6.1.2. TYPE SRLOADS

    The maximum load SR max Iof the SRtype (see clause 2.5.) is determined by combining the loadsSRG, SRL, SRA, defined in clause 2.5.2. which can be expressed by the relation :

    SR max I= (SRG+ SRL + SRA ) m

    The note in clause 2.6.1.1. above applies here also.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    59/312

    2 - 37

    2.6.2. CASE II - NORMAL SERVICE WITH WIND

    2.6.2.1. TYPE SMLOADS

    The maximum load SM max IIof the SMtype (see clause 2.5.) is determined by combining the loads

    SMG, SMLand SMFdefined in clause 2.5.1. with one of the following two combinations :

    a) the load SMAand the load SMW 8corresponding to a 80 N/m2wind.

    b) the load SMW 25corresponding to a 250 N/m2wind.

    The higher of the two values expressed by the relations set out below is taken :

    SM max II = ( SMG+ SML + SMF + SMA + SMW 8) mor

    SM max II = (SMG+ SML + SMF + SMW 25) m

    The note in clause 2.6.1.1. applies here also.

    2.6.2.2. TYPE SRLOADS

    The maximum load SR max IIof the SRtype (see clause 2.5.) is determined by combining the loadsSRG, SRLand SRAdefined in clause 2.5.2. with SRW 25which corresponds to a 250 N/m

    2wind, as

    expressed by the relation :

    SR max II = (SRG+ SRL + SRA + SRW 25) m

    The note in clause 2.6.1.1. applies here also.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    60/312

    2 - 38

    2.6.3. CASE III - EXCEPTIONAL LOADS

    2.6.3.1. TYPE SMLOADS

    The maximum load SM max IIIof the SMtype defined under clause 2.5. is determined by

    considering the maximum load that the motor can actually transmit to the mechanism, allowingfor limitations due to practical operating conditions.

    The values of SM max IIIare specified in clause 2.6.4.

    2.6.3.2. TYPE SRLOADS

    Since the consequences of an overload due to collision with a buffer or fouling are far lessserious for a mechanism than for the structure, the exceptional loading to be taken is that givenunder paragraph a) of clause 2.3.3. in the structures chapter.

    This gives : SR max III= (SRG+ SRW max)

    In cases where additional mooring or guying means are used to ensure immobility or stabilityunder maximum wind, the effect of these devices on the mechanism must be taken into accountwhere applicable.

    2.6.4. APPLICATION OF THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS FOR CALCULATINGSM

    The mechanisms of hoisting appliances perform one of the following functions :

    - Purely vertical displacements of the centre of gravity of moving masses (e.g. hoistingmotions).

    - Purely horizontal displacements in which the centre of gravity of the moving masses as awhole shifts horizontally (e.g. traverse, travel, slewing or counterbalanced luffing motions).

    - Movements combining an elevation of the centre of gravity of the moving masses with ahorizontal displacement (e.g. non-counterbalanced luffing).

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    61/312

    2 - 39

    2.6.4.1. HOISTING MOTIONS

    For type SMloads, the formula reduces to the following :

    Case I and II : SM max I= (SML+ SMF) m

    In this case the load due to the hoisting acceleration is neglected because it is small comparedto SML.

    Case III : SM max III= 1,6 ( SML+ SMF)

    Bearing in mind the general rules of clause 2.6.3.1., it is assumed that the maximum loads thatcan be transmitted to hoisting mechanisms are limited in practice to 1,6 times the SM max Iload

    11.

    2.6.4.2. HORIZONTAL MOTIONS

    Case I - The formula reduces to :

    SM max I= (SMF+ SMA) m

    Case II - The higher of the following two values is taken :

    SM max II = (SMF+ SMA + SMW 8) mor

    SM max II= (SMF+ SMW 25) m

    Case III - For SM max IIIthe load corresponding to the maximum torque of the motor (or the brake)is taken unless operating conditions limit the torque actually transmitted, through wheel slip onthe rails, or through the use of suitable limiting means (e.g. hydraulic coupling, torque limiter,etc.). In this case the value actually transmitted must be taken

    12.

    11In a hoisting motion it is impossible under normal working conditions to transmit to the mechanism loadsgreater than those due to the hoisting of the working load, as the effects of acceleration are negligible.A greater load could result only from mishandling (poor judgement of the load, etc.).

    On the basis of experience gained over many years of practice with widely differing hoistingappliances it is now accepted that a coefficient of 1,6 gives adequate safety. It must be stressedthat the use of excessively powerful motors should be avoided.12

    Whereas in the case of hoisting motions the loads normally transmitted to the mechanism are limited by theload lifted, in horizontal motions the maximum torque of the motor can always be transmitted to the

    mechanism if no mechanical limitation exists. This is why a different way of evaluating SM max IIIhas beenspecified according to whether a hoist motion or other motion is being considered.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    62/312

    2 - 40

    2.6.4.3. COMBINED MOTIONS

    Case I and II :For cases I and II, the load SM max II

    13is determined by applying the general formula defined in

    clauses 2.6.1.1. and 2.6.2.1.

    Case III :The load caused by applying the maximum motor torque SMC max III can be taken for the maximumvalue SM max III This often unduly high value is always acceptable since it enhances safety.

    It must be used when the power involved for raising the centres of gravity of the moving massesis negligible compared to the power needed to overcome accelerations or wind effects.

    Conversely, when the effect of the accelerations or the wind is negligible in comparison with theeffect of displacing the centres of gravity of the moving masses vertically, this value is too highand SM max IIIcan be calculated from the formula :

    SM max III= 1,6 SM max II

    Between these two limiting values, each individual case should be examined according to themotor chosen, the method of starting and the relative magnitudes of the loads due to inertia andwind effects on the one hand and those due to raising of the centres of gravity on the other.

    Without exception, when operating conditions limit the torque actually transmitted to themechanism (see clause 2.6.4.2.), this limiting torque will be taken as the value of SMC max if it isless than the values defined above.

    .

    13

    or SM max Iin the case of appliances not subjected to wind.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    63/312

    2 - 41

    APPENDIX

    A.2.1.1. - HARMONISATION OF THE CLASSES OF UTILIZATION OFAPPLIANCES AND MECHANISMS

    The present appendix sets out to demonstrate a method by which it is possible in many cases toderive the class of utilization of mechanisms from that of appliances as a whole and from certainparameters characterising the duty to be performed.

    The starting point is the average duration tmc(in seconds) of a hoisting cycle as defined in clause2.1.2.2. This is therefore the time necessary to perform all the operations in such a cycle.

    The total duration of use T of the appliance, expressed in hours, is then given by the relation :

    T = N.tmc/ 3600

    Where N represents the number of hoisting cycles determining the class of utilization of theappliance.

    Table T.A.2.1.1.1. gives the values of T for cycle durations of 30 - 480 s in accordance with theclass of utilization of the appliance. The number of hoisting cycles is the maximum number forthis class of utilization ; these values are, however, adjusted to 15 625, 31 250 and 62 500respectively for class U0, U1 and U2, in order to reduce the number of different values for T.

    The next step is to determine for each mechanism the ratio ibetween the duration of use of the

    mechanism during a hoisting cycle and the average duration tmcof the cycle.

    Table T.A.2.1.1.2. gives the total durations of use T iof the mechanism depending on the total

    duration of use of the appliance, and for various conventional values of the ratio i. This table

    also shows the class of utilization of the mechanism. The various classes are represented bythe stepped areas.

    It is thus sufficient to determine the class of utilization of the appliance by reference to table

    T.2.1.2.2., the average duration of the hoisting cycle and the values of iin order to obtain the

    classes of utilization of the mechanisms.

    From the curves of the nomogram T.A.2.1.1.3. the classes of utilization for the mechanisms interms of these three parameters can be found directly.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    64/312

    2 - 42

    Table T.A.2.1.1.1. - Total duration of use (T) of lifting appliances in hours

    Averagedurationof a

    Class of utilization of appliances

    hoistingcycletmc(s)

    U0 U1 U2 U3 U4 U5 U6 U7 U8 U9

    30

    45

    60

    75

    90

    120

    150

    180

    240

    300

    360

    420

    480

    130

    195

    260

    325

    390

    520

    650

    780

    1 040

    1 300

    1 565

    1 825

    2 085

    260

    390

    520

    650

    780

    1 040

    1 300

    1 565

    2 085

    2 605

    3 125

    3 645

    4 165

    520

    780

    1 040

    1 300

    1 565

    2 085

    2 605

    3 125

    4 165

    5 210

    6 250

    7 290

    8 335

    1 040

    1 565

    2 085

    2 605

    3 125

    4 165

    5 210

    6 250

    8 335

    10 415

    12 500

    14 585

    16 665

    2 085

    3 125

    4 165

    5 210

    6 250

    8 335

    10 415

    12 500

    16 665

    20 835

    25 000

    29 165

    33 335

    4 165

    6 250

    8 335

    10 415

    12 500

    16 665

    20 835

    25 000

    33 335

    41 665

    50 000

    58 335

    66 665

    8 335

    12 500

    16 665

    20 835

    25 000

    33 335

    41 665

    50 000

    66 665

    83 335

    100 000

    116 665

    133 335

    16 665

    25 000

    33 335

    41 665

    50 000

    66 665

    83 335

    100 000

    133 335

    166 665

    200 000________

    > 200 000

    > 200 000

    33 335

    50 000

    66 665

    83 335

    100 000

    133 335

    166 665

    200 000________

    > 200 000

    > 200 000

    > 200 000

    > 33 335

    > 50 000

    > 66 665

    > 83 335

    > 100 000

    > 133 335

    > 166 665________

    > 200 000

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    65/312

    2 - 43

    Table T.A.2.1.1.2. - Total duration of use Ti(in hours) of mechanisms in terms of T and i

    T Values of i Class ofutilization for

    (h) 1,00 0,63 0,40 0,25 0,16 0,10 mechanism

    130 130 82 52 33 21 13

    195 195 123 78 49 31 20260 260 164 104 65 42 26

    325 325 205 130 81 52 33390 390 246 156 98 62 39520 520 328 208 130 83 52 T0

    650 650 410 260 163 104 65780 780 491 312 195 125 78

    1 040 1 040 655 416 260 166 1041 300 1 300 819 520 325 208 1301 565 1 565 986 626 391 250 157

    1 825 1 825 1 150 730 456 292 1832 085 2 085 1 314 834 521 334 209

    2 605 2 605 1 641 1 042 651 417 261 T13 125 3 125 1 969 1 250 781 500 3133 645 3 645 2 296 1 458 911 583 365

    4 165 4 165 2 624 1 666 1 041 666 4175 210 5 210 3 282 2 084 1 303 834 521 T26 250 6 250 3 938 2 500 1 563 1 000 625

    7 290 7 290 4 593 2 916 1 823 1 166 7298 335 8 335 5 251 3 334 2 084 1 334 834

    10 415 10 415 6 561 4 166 2 604 1 666 1 042 T312 500 12 500 7 875 5 000 3 125 2 000 1 25014 585 14 585 9 189 5 834 3 646 2 334 1 45916 665 16 665 10 499 6 666 4 166 2 666 1 667

    20 835 20 835 13 126 8 334 5 209 3 334 2 084 T425 000 25 000 15 750 10 000 6 250 4 000 2 50029 165 29 165 18 374 11 666 7 291 4 666 2 917

    33 335 33 335 21 001 13 334 8 334 5 334 3 33441 665 41 665 26 249 16 666 10 416 6 666 4 167 T550 000 50 000 31 500 20 000 12 500 8 000 5 000

    58 335 58 335 36 751 23 334 14 584 9 334 5 83466 665 66 665 41 999 26 666 16 666 10 666 6 667

    83 335 83 335 52 501 33 334 20 834 13 334 8 334 T6100 000 100 000 63 000 40 000 25 000 16 000 10 000116 665 116 665 73 499 46 666 29 166 18 666 11 667

    133 335 133 335 84 001 53 334 33 334 21 334 13 334166 665 166 665 104 999 66 666 41 666 26 666 16 667 T7200 000 200 000 126 000 80 000 50 000 32 000 20 000

    > 200 000 > 200 000 > 126 000 > 80 000 > 50 000 > 32 000 > 20 000T8

    T9

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    66/312

    2 - 44

    Table T.A.2.1.1.3. - Classes of utilization for appliances and mechanisms

    U - Class of utilization for appliances T - Class of utilization for mechanisms

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    67/312

    2 - 45

    EXAMPLE OF APPLICATION

    Dockside cargo crane.

    The class of utilization for the appliance will be U5.

    A hoisting cycle comprises the following operations :

    - hoisting of load ;- travelling ;- slewing ;- lowering ;- unhooking of load ;- hoisting empty ;- slewing ;- travelling ;- lowering empty ;- hooking on of new load.

    The average time for completion of the cycle will be estimated at 150 s.

    The ratios iwill be estimated as follows :

    - hoisting (hoisting and lowering) : i= 0.63

    - slewing (2 directions) : i= 0.25

    - travelling (do.) : i= 0.10

    Table T.A.2.1.1.1. gives us for class U5 and tmc = 150 s :

    T = 20 835 h

    For the various mechanisms, table T.A.2.1.1.2. gives us, for T = 20 835 h, the following totaldurations Tiand classes of utilization :

    - hoisting (i= 0.63) : Ti = 13 126 h T7

    - slewing (i= 0.25) : Ti = 5 209 h T5

    - travelling (i

    = 0.10) : Ti = 2 084 h T4

    From the curves in table T.A.2.1.1.3. the same conclusions are drawn on the basis of theordinate tmc= 150 s (broken line).

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    68/312

    2 - 46

    A.2.2.3. - CALCULATION OF LOADS DUE TO ACCELERATIONS OFHORIZONTAL MOTIONS

    PART 1 - METHOD

    1. - BASIC DATA

    Let

    v be the steady horizontal velocity of the point of suspension of the load, either at the end ofthe acceleration period, or at the beginning of the braking period, according to whether anacceleration or a braking process is being considered, and

    F an imaginary horizontal force in the same direction as v, applied at the point of suspensionof the load and producing the same effect on the motion under consideration as the

    accelerating or decelerating torque applied by the motor or the brake.

    2. - PROCEDURE

    The different quantities set out below must be calculated in succession.

    Equivalent mass (m)

    The inertia of all moving parts other than the load, in the motion under consideration, is replacedby a single equivalent mass m assumed to be concentrated at the point of suspension of theload and given by the relation :

    m = m0+i [ ( Ii. wi2) / v2]

    Where :

    m0 is the total mass of all elements, other than the load, undergoing the same pure linearmotion as the point of suspension of the load ;

    Ii the moment of inertia of a part undergoing a rotation during the motion under consideration,this moment of inertia being considered about the axis of rotation, and

    wi the angular velocity of the part referred to, about its axis of rotation, corresponding to the

    linear velocity v of the point of suspension of the load.

    The sum covers all parts in rotation (structure, mechanisms, motor) during the motion

    considered. However, in the case of mechanisms, the inertia of components other than thosedirectly coupled to the motor shaft can be ignored.

    Mean acceleration or deceleration ( Jm ) :Jm= F / (m + m1)

    where m1is the mass of the load.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    69/312

    2 - 47

    Mean duration of acceleration or deceleration ( Tm) :

    Tm= v / Jm

    Mean inertia forces :

    The acceleration corresponding to the acceleration Jmat the point of suspension of the load iscalculated for each component part in motion. Multiplying this acceleration by the mass of thecomponent considered gives the mean inertia force it sustains.

    In the particular case of the load itself, this force of inertia F cmwill be given by :

    Fcm= m1. Jm

    Period of oscillation : Tl T1= 2 . . ( l / g )0,5

    l = the length of suspension of the load when it is in its uppermost position (values of l below2,00 m need not be taken into consideration) and,g = the acceleration due to gravity.

    Value of : = m1/ m

    When the system driving the motion controls the acceleration and the deceleration and

    maintains it at a constant value, is taken equal to 0 irrespective of the masses m and m1.

    Value of : = Tm/ T1

    Value ofh:

    With the values obtained for and , the graph in figure A.2.2.1. is used to find the corresponding

    valueh.

    Inertia forces to be considered in the design of the structure :

    The forces of inertia which take account of dynamic effects and which must therefore beconsidered in the structural calculations are obtained as follows :

    - Inertia force due to the load : h. Fcm

    - Inertia force on moving parts other than the load : twice the mean inertia forces.

    3. - JUSTIFICATION

    A justification of the method given above follows in part 2 of this appendix.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    70/312

    2 - 48

    PART 2 - EXPLANATION OF THE METHOD

    1. - STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

    A hoisting appliance is a physical system consisting essentially of :

    - concentrated masses (hook load, counterweights, ...) and distributed masses (girders,ropes, ...),

    - elastic connections between these masses (girders, ropes, ...).

    If such a system, originally in a state of equilibrium, is subjected to a varying load, it does nottend progressively towards a new state of equilibrium even if the new load applied is itselfconstant. On the contrary, it is set in a more or less complex oscillating motion about this newstate of equilibrium. During this motion, the various internal loads and stresses of the systemcan exceed sometimes to a marked extent - the values they would have assumed had thesystem been in static equilibrium under the influence of the new load.

    Such a situation arises during acceleration or deceleration (braking) of a horizontal motion of ahoisting appliance. Thus if, starting from a position of rest, an appliance or part of an appliancebegins a motion of translation or rotation, the component parts of the system undergoaccelerations and are therefore subjected to inertia forces. Once a steady speed is attained, theacceleration ceases, the inertia forces disappear and the external load undergoes a newvariation.

    The angle through which a rotating system turns (e.g. the rotating part of a crane) during the timefor which inertia forces are applied is generally relatively small. This being so, no appreciable

    error will be involved if one assumes that each point in the system follows a straight path duringthis time. Since, moreover, there is no difference of principle between the treatment used forlinear motions and motions of rotation, in what follows the linear motion will be considered ingreater detail (chapter 2), whereas only a short note (chapter 3) will cover rotation.

    licenced to KREISLER

    http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/http://www.vdma-verlag.com/home/
  • 8/10/2019 Fem - Rules for the Design of Hoisting Appliances 1.001, 10-01-1998

    71/312

    2 - 49

    2. - CALCULATING THE LOADS IN THE CASE OF A LINEAR MOTION

    2.1. - GENERAL DATA

    It is now proposed to examine the particular case of braking of the travel motion of a completeoverhead travelling crane when it is carrying a load suspended from its hoisting rope. Other

    cases encountered in practice can be dealt with in similar fashion.

    Considering figure A.2.1. let :m1 be the mass of the suspended load,m the total mass of the overhead travelling crane including the crab (see note below

    concerning the inertia of the motor and of the machinery driving the motion),x a coordinate defining the position of the crane along its track (more precisely, x represents

    the coordinate of the point of suspension of the hoisting rope along an axis parallel to the