fees for banking services report 2013

8/11/2019 Fees for Banking Services Report 2013

1/42

Submission

Fees for Banking Services

2013 Report

Prepared by the Australian Bankers Association Inc.


2/42

2

2013 Report

Contents

1. Overview ..........................................................................................................................................................9

2. Bank service fee revenue adjusted for asset growth............................................................................... 13

3. Bank service fee revenue and bank income and profits ......................................................................... 14

4. Households .................................................................................................................................................. 16

5. Housing loans .............................................................................................................................................. 21

6.

Credit cards .................................................................................................................................................. 23

7. Transaction accounts - Households .......................................................................................................... 25

8. Businesses ................................................................................................................................................... 28

9. Exception fees .............................................................................................................................................. 33

10. Bank service fees and low-income earners .............................................................................................. 36

11. Financial services prices ............................................................................................................................ 38

12. Bank service points and improvements .................................................................................................... 39


3/42


2013 Report

3

About the data

This report has been prepared by the Australian Bankers Association (ABA). It analyses data which is submitted

by banks for the annual Banking Fees survey. The same data are also collected by the Reserve Bank of Australia

(RBA). The survey has been conducted since 1997.

Survey reference period

The reference period for the collection of the survey data cover the 12 months to the end of June.

Global financial crisis

Readers should be aware that the data are affected by the ongoing effects of the global financial crisis (GFC). It is

widely recognised that the peak of the GFC occurred in September/October 2008. Following this, the ability of

businesses to access capital markets for their funding was severely constrained and many businesses returned to

banks for their funding. This resulted in a higher than usual increase in bank service fee revenue mainly from large

businesses.

International fees data

The RBA Banking Fees survey is unique from an international perspective. No other comparable economies (e.g.

UK, USA, NZ or Canada) conduct a similar survey.

Studies of banking fees which attempt to provide international comparisons are limited by the lack of detailed

statistics for countries other than Australia. These studies often rely on advertised fee rates and include broad

assumptions about the use of banking services. For example, fees associated with bundling/packaging of banking

services are difficult to incorporate in data models but are captured in the Reserve Bank survey.

Fees datagross basis

Bank service fee revenue statistics are gross measures and are collected on a pre-tax basis.

Impact of changes in transaction and loan volumes on fees

The statistics released by the RBA are not adjusted for changes in volume of banking business. For example,

while the survey results show that aggregate fees increased by a small amount this year, the survey does not

collect data to show how this relates to changes in banking business volumes such as numbers of customer

accounts, transaction volumes or loan volumes.

In this report, the ABA has produced a number of ratios which are based on a range of official statistics as released

by RBA, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Some of

these ratios enable an appreciation of how fees change as customer activity changes.

Coverage

Readers should note that the results from the RBA survey differ slightly from the ABA survey results contained in

this report. The RBA includes more institutions in their survey but the impact of these institutions is very small.

The survey results prior to 2001 have been affected by coverage changes. That is, over the early life of the survey,

new institutions were added to the survey or mergers took place with institutions which were not previously in the

survey. While these effects continue even in more recent years, the impact on the data was more significant prior

to 2001.

Readers should be aware that a change in coverage may cause only a small impact at the aggregate level but may

have a more significant effect at the product level. For example, if a bank purchases a home loan provider (which

was not already in the survey), this may have little effect at the aggregate fee level but it may have a noticeable

effect on bank service fee revenue received from home lending.


4/42


2013 Report

4

ABS price measures for financial services

The Banking Fees survey aims to collect the amount of bank service fee revenue in dollars. It does not produce an

overall price measure for bank services.

The survey does not incorporate the broader income sources of banks, usage volumes or changing patterns of

consumer usage for bank services. The official measure which best captures this is produced by the Australian

Bureau of Statistics as part of the Consumer Price Index (CPI). This is covered in this report (see the section titledFinancial Services prices). The Banking Fees survey provides information on only one component of the income

and expenses of banks i.e. bank service fee revenue.

Exception fees

This is the fifth year for which data has been collected and released on exception fees.

Over 2010 and 2011, banks have made significant changes to a number of exception fees which is reflected in the

survey results (see Section 9 of this report).

Revisions

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) seeks to improve the data where possible. Readers should note that data

were revised significantly in the 2011 report. In particular, data relating to fees from businesses lending and bank

bills were revised considerably. Some of these data series were revised back to the start of the survey (1997).

Revisions may also arise if the underlying benchmark data used to construct ratios has been revised.

Previous releases

Readers can refer to:

Fees for Banking Services 2012 Report, prepared by the Australian Bankers Association.

Weblink:http://www.bankers.asn.au/Media/Media-Releases/Media-Release-2012/Household-paying-less-for-banking-fees


Weblink: www.bankers.asn.au/ArticleDocuments/163/FeesforBankingServicesReport-2011.pdf.aspx


Weblink: www.bankers.asn.au/Fees-for-Banking-Services-Report-2010

ABA has drawn upon the previous work done by Associate Professor Hawtrey in the general content and style of

this latest report.
http://www.bankers.asn.au/Media/Media-Releases/Media-Release-2012/Household-paying-less-for-banking-feeshttp://www.bankers.asn.au/Media/Media-Releases/Media-Release-2012/Household-paying-less-for-banking-feeshttp://www.bankers.asn.au/Media/Media-Releases/Media-Release-2012/Household-paying-less-for-banking-feeshttp://www.bankers.asn.au/Media/Media-Releases/Media-Release-2012/Household-paying-less-for-banking-feeshttp://www.bankers.asn.au/ArticleDocuments/163/FeesforBankingServicesReport-2011.pdf.aspxhttp://www.bankers.asn.au/ArticleDocuments/163/FeesforBankingServicesReport-2011.pdf.aspxhttp://www.bankers.asn.au/ArticleDocuments/163/FeesforBankingServicesReport-2011.pdf.aspxhttp://www.bankers.asn.au/Media/Media-Releases/Media-Release-2012/Household-paying-less-for-banking-feeshttp://www.bankers.asn.au/Media/Media-Releases/Media-Release-2012/Household-paying-less-for-banking-fees


5/42


2013 Report

5

Summary comments

Bank service fee revenue collected over the 2012 survey was against a backdrop of solid economic conditions

even though the effects of the global financial crisis were still evident. Employment continued to rise,

unemployment was low, business investment was strong and so too were business profits.

Small increase in total bank service fee revenue with average fee growth at a record low

Over 2012, banks collected $11.3 billion in bank service fee revenue from businesses and households, a 4.2%increase over the previous year.

Over the three years ending 2012, the average annual growth in total bank service fee revenue was 1.0% per

year, a record low. The three-year average has fallen sharply from a pace of 7.5% three years ago (2009).

The main driver of bank service fee revenue continues to be business volumes, not fee increases

Increasing bank business volumes are the main driver of bank fee revenue, not higher fees. This is evidenced by the

strong downward trend in the ratio of bank service fee revenue to banks resident assets since 2001.

Over the past five years, bank assets have been growing, on average, by 9.4% per year. This is 2.6 times faster

than the average growth in bank service fee revenue (3.6%) over the same time

This years survey shows thatbank service fee revenue as a proportion of domestic assets was at a record low of

0.44%. In 2001 and 2002 it was 0.85%.


6/42


2013 Report

6

Total fees from households at seven year low

Bank service fee revenue from households fell by $13 million or 0.3% to $4.05 billion this year (2012). This

is the lowest level in seven years (since 2005).

Large falls in bank service fee revenue from households compared with three years ago

Compared with three years ago, bank fees paid by households have fallen by $1.12 billion or 22%. In 2012,

bank service fee revenue from householdsfell by $13 million (0.3%), by $259 million (6.0%) in 2011 and by

a very large $850 million (16.4%) in 2010.

All six broad product categories for households have seen significant falls in bank service fee revenuewhen compared withthreeyears ago.

Transaction account fees fell by $808 million or 43%

Other account fees fell by $25 million or 33%

Housing loan fees fell by $163 million or 12%

Personal loan fees fell by $25 million or 7%

Credit cards fees fell $83 million or 6%

Other fees have fallen by $17 million or 15%.


7/42


2013 Report

7

Fees as a proportion of household expenditure ... now at record low levels

The proportion of household spending1on bank service fees fell to 0.51% in 2012, the lowest since 1999.

Over the four years, 2006-2009, it was in the range 0.74% to 0.77%.

Businesses ... average fee growth falls

Bank service fee revenue from businesses was $7.3 billion in 2012. This is a 6.9% or $473 million

increase over the previous year with 56% of the increase coming from large businesses and 44% from

small businesses.

Over the past five years large businesses have contributed 68% of the increase in fees from businesses.

Over this time average growth rate in fees paid by large businesseshas been 13.6%. This compares with

an average 4.6% per year for small businesses, nearly three times lower than for large businesses.

On a three yearaverage basis, growth in bank service fee revenue from business was 7.8% for the three

years ending 2012 falling over the past two years from 9.8%. Note that the low growth rates from 2004 to

2006 largely reflect the merchant fee reforms from 2004.

In the three years after the onset of the global financial crisis (2008, 2009 and 2010), bank service fee

revenue from businesses was growing, averaging 9.8% per year. During this time, businesses increasingly

turned to banks to support their financing needs as other markets tightened or closed entirely. This saw

aggregate fees on business lendingincrease by over 20% in 2009 and 2010.

1Household final consumption expenditure (see ABS National Accounts)


8/42


2013 Report

8

Large falls in bank fees on transactions accounts benefit households and businesses

This is the fourth consecutive year fees paid by householdsfor their transactions accounts fell and the fifth

consecutive year in which bank service fee revenue has fallen for businessdeposit accounts.

At $1.05 billion in 2012, bank fees from transaction accounts is the lowest amount in 11 years, since 2001.

Over the past four years, fee revenue from household transaction accounts has fallen by $1.05 billion and

is now half of what it was in 2008. Bank service fee revenue from household transaction accounts as a proportion of total household deposits

was at a record low of 0.19% in 2012.

Businesses have experienced a 25% or $212 million fall in fees on deposit accounts over the past five

years.

Lower income groups pay lower fees

The lowest three income quintiles contributed 14% each to the total duties, taxes and charges on financial

institution accounts over 2009-10. The two highest income quintiles paid double that (29%).

Over the six years between the two ABS household expenditure surveys, the percentage of weeklyspending on transaction accounts by the lowest income quintile has fallen from 0.34% (in 2003-04) to

0.28% (in 2009-10).

Exception fees ... stabilise after two years of large falls

A total of $654 million of exception fees were paid by households and businesses in 2012, a small increase

of 2.6% or $17 million over the previous year but still $836 million or 56% lower than three years ago.

Over the previous two years, 2010 and 2011, total exception fees fell by a very large $859 million or 58%.

For households, the fall was $743 million or 57% while for businesses it was $116 million or 59%.

For businesses, 84% of the fall in exception fees over 2010 and 2011 was to small businesses.

Exception fees represent only 0.8% of banks total operating income.


9/42


2013 Report

9

1. Overview

Aggregate bank service fee revenue in 2012 was $11.3 billion. This is an increase of $460 million or 4.2% over the

previous year. This result follows a small riseof 0.3% in 2011. Before that, in 2010, the first fall in the history of

the survey was seen (a 1.4% fall).

Across the two broad customer segments this year, bank service fee revenue fell by 0.3% to $4.05 billion for

households, while for businesses it increased by 6.9% to $7.29 billion.

This is the third consecutive year that bank service fee revenue from households has fallen.

The small fall of $13 million this year in fees from households follows large falls over the previous two years which

totalled $1.1 billion.

At 6.9%, the growth rate for bank service fee revenue from businesses in 2012 is an increase on that for last year

(4.5%) but remains considerably lower than the 10.4% and 11.9% fee growth for businesses over 2009 and 2010,

a time which reflected increased bank intermediation as a result of the global financial crisis.

Table 1.1Bank service fee revenue

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Households $4,181 $4,613 $5,092 $5,172 $4,323 $4,064 $4,052

. change $437 $433 $479 $80 -$849 -$259 -$13

. %change 11.7% 10.4% 10.4% 1.6% -16.4% -6.0% -0.3%

Business $4,661 $4,922 $5,274 $5,824 $6,520 $6,812 $7,285

. change $76 $261 $352 $550 $696 $292 $473

. %change 1.7% 5.6% 7.2% 10.4% 11.9% 4.5% 6.9%

Total $8,842 $9,535 $10,366 $10,996 $10,843 $10,876 $11,336

. change $513 $694 $831 $630 -$153 $33 $460

. %change 6.2% 7.8% 8.7% 6.1% -1.4% 0.3% 4.2%

Chart 1.1 - Bank service fee revenue


10/42


2013 Report

10

Bank service fee revenue will normally grow if significant indicators of banking activity such as bank assets - which

primarily includes loans - grow.

At the end of June 2012, total resident assets of banks were $2.67 trillion. This was an increase of $187.6 bil lion or

7.5% over the previous year. This growth in resident assets is the strongest since mid-2009 a time when the rate

of growth in assets was falling at a fast rate.

Over financial year 2009-10 resident assets grew by only 1.2% and during the course of that year were evennegative.

Chart 1.2 shows that bank assets grew at a solid pace until the height of the global financial crisis in October 2008,

from which time asset growth sharply declined.

Readers should be aware of the series break in 2002 which has resulted in growth rates being inflated over that 12

month period.

Chart 1.2Resident assets of banks

Source: Reserve Bank Bulletin Table B2.


11/42


2013 Report

11

Usage of banks services responds to many of the same factors as for other services. In particular, if economic

activity is strong, this will more than likely translate into greater use of bank services.

A number of key economic drivers of banking business for both the household and business sectors were solidover the 12 months ending June 2012, these include

2:

Employmentemployment growth moderated in 2011-12 after the high levels experienced in 2010-11. Totalemployment at June 2012 was 11.5 million increasing by 500,000 over the prior two and a half years. The

unemployment rate was low over the financial year 2011-12 being in the range 5.0% to 5.3%.

Wages wages grew by 3.7% over the financial year 2011-12, above CPI (1.2%). This follows 3.8% for the

previous year, 2010-11 and a subdued annualwage growth in 2009-10 (3.1%).

2Data relating to each of the dot points was sourced from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.


12/42


2013 Report

12

Immigration over the year ending June 2012 there were 158,950 permanent arrivals to Australia. On afinancial year basis, this is the highest result on record. (A record level of 163,310 was reached over the 12months ending February 2009). The result this year continues the high level of permanent arrivals to Australiaseen since 2005.

Business profits business profit growth (gross operating surplus) is at a high of $376 billion over the yearending June 2012. After falling by 2.8% over the financial year 2009-10, over the past two years businessprofits have risen by $46 billion or 14.0%.

Business capital expenditure was at record high levels with a total of $154.8 billion being spent bybusinesses over 2011-12 with growth rates at a very large 30%.


13/42


2013 Report

13

2. Bank service fee revenue adjusted for asset growth

Growth in bank service fee revenue should be considered in the context of growth in banking business.

To illustrate this in very simple terms, if the number of home loans on the books of banks increases by 10% it might

be expected that the overall fee revenue for this banking service may increase by around 10%, simply because

there are more home loans to service. To adjust for this increase or volume effect, bank service fee revenue canbe measured against an indicative benchmark of banks business volumes such as resident assetsto make better

comparison of the cost of banking over time. As such, the ratio measure bank fees as a proportion of banks

resident assetscan assist in determining if fees growth is rising faster than asset growth.

Chart 2.1 shows that there has been a downward trend in the proportion of bank service fee revenue to total

resident assets over the past 11 years. In the early part of this decade, this ratio averaged around 0.85%. It is

now at a record low of 0.44%.

Chart 2.1Ratio of bank service fee revenue to resident assets

Source: RBA Bulletin Table B2

The reason that this ratio has been falling is evident from the Table 2.1. That is, banks resident assets have been

growing at a faster rate than bank service fee revenue. Over the past five years, bank assets have been growing,

on average, by 9.4% per year. This is 2.6 times faster than the growth in bank service fee revenue, which

averaged 3.6% per year, over the same time.

Table 2.1Bank service fee revenue and resident assets (%change)

% change over past year

Bank service fee Resident assets

2001 13.1% 9.5%2002 10.5% 16.9%

2003 12.8% 12.4%

2004 2.7% 14.9%

2005 4.7% 10.1%

2006 6.2% 16.3%

2007 7.8% 17.6%

2008 8.7% 24.1%

2009 6.1% 10.4%

2010 -1.4% 1.2%

2011 0.3% 3.7%

2012 4.2% 7.5%


14/42


2013 Report

14

3. Bank service fee revenue and bank income and profits

Bank service fee revenue as a proportion of banksoperating income has stayed within a range of 13.5%-18.0%

since 2001.

Over 2011 and 2012, the ratio has been at the lower end of this narrow range (13.5% and 13.6%). For the tenyears from 2000 to 2009 this ratio was above 15%, falling below 15% in 2010 (14.0%).

Chart 3.1Ratio of bank service fee revenue to operating income

Source: Banks operating incomeis sourced from banks annual reports.

The ratio of bank service fee revenue to bank profit is lower than the longer term average levels. In terms of net

profit before tax (NPBT), the ratio is now at 33.1%. For net profit after tax (NPAT), the ratio is 47.8%.

The increase in the ratio, over 2008 and 2009, was a result of a significant fall in profits. That is, bank profit over

this two year period fell by 25% on a before taxbasis and 26% on an after taxbasis. As such, the increase in the

ratio does not reflect a large rise in fee income; it reflects a large fall in profits.

Chart 3.2Ratio of bank service fee revenue to bank profits

Source: Profit data are sourced from banks annual reports.


15/42


2013 Report

15

The underlying profit outcomesused for Chart 3.2 aboveare shown in the chart below. In particular, the fall in

bank profits over 2008 and 2009 caused the ratio of bank fee revenue to profits to rise.

Chart 3.3Bank profits

Source: Profit data are sourced from banks annual reports.


16/42


2013 Report

16

4. Households

Over the past three consecutive years, bank service fees paid by households have fallen by a total of $1.12 billion

or 21.7%.

For the 2012 survey, bank service fee revenue from householdswas $4.05 billion, a fall of 0.3% or $13 million over

the previous year.

Chart 4.1Bank service fee revenue from households: %change

This year, 2012, fees fell across three of the six major products categories for households. The biggest fall, in

dollar value terms, of $25 million or 2.3% was for fees relating to transaction accounts followed by a fall of $21

million in fees from housing loans.

The largest increase in fees from households this year was for credit cards which saw a small $19 million or 1.5%

increase over the year.

Chart 4.2Change in bank service fee revenue paid by households by product


17/42


2013 Report

17

The following chart shows the substantial falls in bank service fee revenue paid by households compared withthreeyears ago.

Compared with three years ago, all of the six broad product categories relating to households have experienced afall in bank service fee revenue. In particular, fees from transaction accounts have fallen by 43% or $808 billioncompared with three years ago (2009). The amount that customers pay in fees for housing loans is $163 million or12% lower than three years ago and for credit cards, fees are $83 million or 6% less.

Chart 4.3Change in bank service fee revenue paid by households by product

Contribution by households to total bank service fee revenue

In 2012, bank service fee revenue from households accounted for 35.7% of total bank service fee revenue, thelowest share on record (since the first year of the survey - 1997).

Over the four years from 2006 to 2009, households accounted for 47% to 49% of bank service fee revenue.

Chart 4.4Bank service fee revenue % from households


18/42


2013 Report

18

Bank service fee revenue as a proportion of household spending

It is useful to compare bank service fee revenue from households with total household spending, using the ABS

National Accounts aggregateHousehold Final Consumption Expenditure (HFCE).

This year saw the fourth consecutive fall in the proportion of household expenditure on bank fees. That is, it fell

from 0.77% in 2008 to 0.51% in 2012. The current level of 0.51% is the lowest since 1999.

Chart 4.5Bank service fee revenue from households as a % of HFCE

Source: ABS National Accounts - Household Final Consumption Expenditure.

Proportion of bank fees from lending to households

Over the 12 months ending June 2012, banks average outstanding loans to households (excluding securitisations)

were $1.17 trillion.

The proportion of bank service fee revenue from all bank lending to households, to aggregate bank lending tohouseholds, conveniently summarises the relationship between these two items.

Over the past year (2012), bank service fee revenue from loans to households was only a small fraction (0.24%) of

total lending to households and is now at the lowest level since 1997 (the first year of the survey). This ratio was

in a tight range of 0.36% to 0.38% for seven years from 2002 to 2008.

Over the past five consecutive years, since 2008, the ratio has fallen from 0.38% to 0.24% now.

Chart 4.6Bank service fee revenue from households as a proportion of loans


19/42


2013 Report

19

Contribution by product to bank fees paid by households

In 2012, credit cards were the highest contributor to bank service fee revenue from households at 32%, followed by

housing loans at 30%.

Chart 4.7Bank service fee revenue from households: %distribution

In 2012, bank service fee revenue from transaction accounts made up 26% of total bank fees from households, the

lowest on record.

Over the ten years from 1999 to 2008, fee revenue from transaction accounts was the highest contributor to bank

fees from households, ranging from 41% to 46% of total bank service fee revenue from households. This

contribution has fallen significantly, over the four consecutive years since 2008 to 26% this year as a result of major

changes to banks fee structures relating to transaction accounts. This has seen the value of these fees fall by 50%

or just over $1 billion, over the past four years.

The proportion of bank service fee revenue from credit cards and housing loans has grown considerably over

recent years. This has been a result of large falls in fees on transaction accounts, not by rises in fees for credit

cards and housing loans.

Chart 4.8Contribution to bank service fee revenue from households by product


20/42


2013 Report

20

Average Weekly Bank Fees Paid by Households

In 2012, there were 8.7 million households paying, on average, around $8.94 per week in bank fees. This is a fall

of 19 cents per week or 2% over the past year. This continues the fee reductions experienced by Australian

households over the past four years. That is, in 2008, the average weekly bank service fees paid by households

reached a high of $12.12, but have fallen by $3.17 or 26% since then.

The average weekly value of fees paid by households is now the lowest since 2004.

Chart 4.9Average weekly bank fees paid by households

Average weekly fees on household transaction accounts

For households who only have a transaction account, the average weekly fees were $2.33 this year, the smallest

amount over the past decade. Average weekly fees paid on transaction accounts fell by 10 cents per week or 4%,

compared with last year.

Four years ago (2008), the average weekly fees paid by households on their transaction accounts reached a high

of $5.02 per week, Since then, it has fallen to less than half this amount, a fall of $2.69 per week or 54%, to $2.33

now.

Many customers have multiple transaction accounts, the data below have not been adjusted to account for this.

Chart 4.10Average weekly bank fees paid by households on transaction accounts


21/42


2013 Report

21

5. Housing loans

The most important asset owned by the majority of Australian households is their home. Banks play a significant

part in assisting households to purchase their own home, with housing loans making up 90% of all lending by

banks to households.

At the end of June 2012, there were around 5.6 million active home loans with banks, including owner-occupier andinvestor home loans. The total value of lending for home loans on the books of Australian banks was just over $1

trillion.

Just over two-thirds (68%) of housing loans with banks are to owner-occupiers while the remaining 32% are for

housing investment. That is, banks provide 3.9 million loans to Australian households to purchase their own home

while there are 1.7 million housing investment loans which assist Australian households with their investment

strategies.

Banks continuously manage the huge volume of home loans and provide customers with a range of services

associated with their home loan.

These services include home loan service centres, call centres, relationship managers, provision of regular loan

statements to customers and providing advice to customers and conducting discharge processes for those who

have paid off their loan.

Customers who may be facing changes to their life circumstances such as job loss, illness or family breakdown -

or who may generally have difficulties in managing their loan repayments, are provided with services such as

assistance or options to try to manage any disruption to their repayments.

Not only do banks manage the large volume of home loans already on their loan books, they also process large

volumes of new loans each year.

Housing finance statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) show that over the 12 months to the end

June 2012, there were 500,417 new housing loan commitments made by banks to owner-occupiers with a value of

$152 billion. Furthermore, ABA estimates that this rises to nearly 708,558 if investor loans are added.

The total value of housing loan approvals made by banks to owner-occupiers and investors was estimated to be

$227.5 billion over the 12 months ending June 2012.

Table 5.1New housing loan commitments

Owner-occupiers Investment housing (est) Total (est)

Banks Loans Value ($bn) Loans Loans Loans Value ($bn)

2001 433,833 $58.9 152,472 $24.8 586,305 $83.7

2002 477,393 $74.6 195,750 $36.7 673,143 $111.3

2003 474,216 $83.9 239,015 $50.8 713,231 $134.7

2004 487,066 $97.9 254,783 $61.4 741,849 $159.3

2005 477,826 $104.3 216,922 $56.8 694,748 $161.1

2006 543,135 $121.9 229,369 $61.8 772,504 $183.7

2007 572,034 $134.6 238,393 $67.3 810,427 $201.92008 559,246 $143.5 249,443 $76.8 808,689 $220.3

2009 550,706 $154.3 214,338 $72.1 765,044 $226.4

2010 513,446 $154.9 219,601 $79.5 733,047 $234.4

2011 454,057 $143.1 194,263 $73.4 648,320 $216.5

2012 500,417 $151.8 208,141 $75.7 708,558 $227.5


22/42


2013 Report

22

This is the second consecutive year in which bank fees from housing loans has fallen. Bank fees from housing

loans were $1.2 billion in 2012 which was $177 million or 12.7% lessthan two years ago. In fact, bank service fee

revenue from housing loans is at the lowest level in four years. The fall in bank service fee revenue has been as a

result of reductions or removal of a number of fees such as exit fees.

Chart 5.1Housing loans: %change in bank service fee revenue

Banks service fee revenue from home loans can be understood better by summarising it as a proportion of the total

value of home loans on the books of banks.

The value of bank service fee revenue from home loans, as a proportion of average home loan outstandings, is

now at the lowest level on record. The total value of bank service fee revenue collected from housing loans is

much less than 1% (0.11%) of the total value of housing loans being managed by banks.

Chart 5.2Housing loans: bank service fee revenue to loans on book

Source: Value of home loans is sourced from RBA Bulletin Table D5.

Note on survey data: Housing loan break costs

The larger increase in fees paid by households on housing loans in 2009 includes the impact of break costs on

fixed loans. Break costs apply when a customer exits a fixed term home loan before that fixed term ends. ABA

does not agree that these costs should be defined as fees as break costs are a market related cost and are

calculated on the basis of the original interest rate, the prevailing market interest rates and the length of loan

remaining. It is also important to note that some customers who decide to pay-out their fixed loan (and hence incur

a break cost) have decided to do so as it is to their financial advantage to do so.


23/42


2013 Report

23

6. Credit cards

Bank service fee revenue from credit cards was $1.3 billion in 2012, increasing by $19 million or 1.5%. As Chart6.1 shows, results for the last three years remain below the high of $1.4 billion reached in 2009.

Six years ago, in 2006, banks service fee revenue from credit cards was growing at 21%. Over the following twoyears, 2007and 2008, the growth rate was just under half that at 10% in 2007 and 11% in 2008. In 2010, credit

cards fees fell by a large $151 million or 11%. This was the first fall on record.

Chart 6.1Bank service fee revenue from credit cards

Data from the Reserve Bank of Australia show that credit card activity is a very high volume bank service channel.

At the end of June 2012, there were 15.0 million credit and charge card accounts in Australia. It is estimated that

banks are the issuer for around 80% of these accounts.

Over the 12 months ending June 2012, there was a net increase of 160,000 credit card accounts with application

volumes being up to three times this amount.

Over the same period, consumers made 1.71 billion credit card transactions with a value of $255 billion. This was

a 5.4% increase in the number of transactions (87 million more than the previous year) and a 4.4% or $10.3 billion

increase in the value of transactions.

In addition there are hundreds of millions of repayment transactions which are made each year.

Table 6.1Summary of credit card activity (annual)

Accounts Cash advances Purchases Total

Number Value Number Value Number Value

m million $bn million $bn million $bn

Jun-02 10.3 36.5 $10.2 843.8 $98.3 880.3 $108.5

Jun-03 10.5 35.6 $10.3 989.2 $123.5 1,024.8 $133.7

Jun-04 11.2 35.8 $10.7 1,083.2 $138.8 1,119.0 $149.5

Jun-05 12.0 36.8 $11.2 1,156.9 $152.5 1,193.7 $163.7

Jun-06 13.0 38.2 $12.2 1,238.1 $166.2 1,276.3 $178.4

Jun-07 13.5 37.5 $12.5 1,304.3 $181.5 1,341.8 $194.0

Jun-08 14.0 35.7 $12.8 1,391.5 $201.3 1,427.1 $214.1

Jun-09 14.3 32.1 $12.2 1,438.5 $209.0 1,470.6 $221.2

Jun-10 14.6 28.8 $11.3 1,528.5 $221.8 1,557.2 $233.0

Jun-11 14.9 27.1 $10.6 1,622.9 $235.2 1,650.0 $245.8

Jun-12 15.0 25.4 $9.9 1,711.1 $245.5 1,736.5 $255.4

Source: Calculated from Reserve Bank Bulletin Table C01


24/42


2013 Report

24

Chart 6.2Credit cards: growth rates

At 3.20% in 2012, credit card fees as a proportion of balance outstanding are at the lowest level since 2003.

Chart 6.3Credit card fees as % of balance outstanding

Source: Credit card balances were sourced from APRA Monthly Banking Statistics.

Another way to view this is to consider fees paid as a proportion of total value of credit accessed using credit cards.

In 2012, a total of $255 billion was spent on credit cards while the fees paid were $1.3 billion, giving a proportion of

0.51%, the lowest since 2004.

Chart 6.4Credit card fees as % of value of transactions


25/42


2013 Report

25

7. Transaction accounts - Households

For the vast majority of bank customers, their most regular experience with banking is through their personal

account that is, their transaction account which is used for day-to-day transactions or their investment account,

generally used for savings.

These personal accounts can be accessed over-the-counter at a bank branch, through telephone banking, at an

ATM, at a retail or service outlet, through direct credit or direct debit or via the Internet. This gives customersaccess to their accounts 24/7 and in fact, most customers use a combination of these service methods, depending

on their needs and/or convenience.

The volume of transactions being processed through these channels every day, around the clock, is huge. The

table below presents a summary of payments statistics based on RBA data.

Over past year, there were 1.74 billion credit card transactions, 834 million ATM transactions, 2.8 billion EFTPOS

transactions, 241 million cheques issued and processed and 2.7 billion direct entry payments.

Internet banking usage was around 3.9 billion in terms of the number of value and non-value transactions in 2012.

Table 7.1Summary of selected payment statistics (financial year basis)

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

Credit cards

Accounts (million) 12.0 13.0 13.7 14.0 14.3 14.6 14.9 15.0

. Number (billion) 1.19 1.28 1.35 1.43 1.47 1.56 1.65 1.74

. Value ($billion) $163.7 $178.4 $196.0 $214.1 $221.2 $233.0 $245.0 $255.8

ATMs

. Number (million) 774.7 805.5 827.5 851.2 861.7 829.6 830.8 834.1

. Value ($billion) $131.0 $136.9 $142.0 $147.5 $152.9 $149.5 $149.7 $151.0

EFTPOS

. Number (billion) 1.15 1.29 1.42 1.63 1.87 2.12 2.45 2.81

. Value (billion) $78.2 $88.4 $97.9 $112.5 $129.9 $142.9 $160.0 $178.5

Cheques

. Number (million) 506.5 466.9 436.8 394.5 351.4 310.6 274.6 241.0

. Value (trillion) $1.68 $1.68 $1.77 $1.77 $1.50 $1.50 $1.35 $1.24

Direct entry

. Number (billion) 1.66 1.77 1.90 2.08 2.22 2.38 2.54 2.66

. Value (trillion) $7.9 $9.0 $10.3 $11.7 $12.0 $11.4 $12.1 $13.3

Source: Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin Tables C4 and C5. While the statistics include banks, building societies, credit unions and some other financial

institutions, banks would make up the greater proportion of the data for each category. Transactions statistics presented above relate to those conducted by bothpersons and businesses. It will be assumed that the proportion of transactions between these two segments remains reasonably stable across the years.

In 2012, bank fees paid by households on their transaction accounts was $1.05 billion, a fallof 2.3% or $25 million

over the past year and the lowest level in 11 years.

This is the fourth consecutive year of falls in the amount of fees paid by households for their transactions accounts.

Over the past four years, fee revenue from transaction accounts has fallen by $1.05 billion or 50%.

The large falls in bank service fees revenue from transaction accounts has been seen across all sub-categories of

transaction account fees i.e. account keeping fees, transaction fees, and other fees (including exception fees).

Chart 7.1Bank service fee revenue from transaction accounts (%change)


26/42


2013 Report

26

Bank fees paid by households on their transaction accounts makes up only a small proportion of total bank income.

In 2012, this was at a low of 1.3%. In 2008, it was 2.5 times this level at 3.3%.

Chart 7.2Bank service fee revenue from transaction accounts as a % of bank income

Over 2012, it is estimated that transaction volumes increased by around 8% while fees on transaction accounts fell

by 2.3%. More so, over the past four years, fees on transaction accounts have fallenby 50% while transaction

volumes have increased by 34% over that time.

That is, the unit cost of transaction banking is falling at a very fast rate.

Chart 7.3Growth in number of transactions


27/42


2013 Report

27

Another way to consider the data is to measure bank service fee revenue from household transaction accounts as

a proportion of total deposits of households held with banks. .

Bank service fee revenue from household transaction accounts was at a record low of 0.19% of total household

deposits this year (2012). For the seven years from 2002 to 2008 this ratio averaged 0.6% or above.

Chart 7.4Bank fees on transaction accounts as a % of household deposits

Source: APRA monthly bank statistics for data on household deposits with banks.


28/42


2013 Report

28

8. Businesses

Over 2012, bank service fee revenue from businesses was $7.3 billion. This is a 6.9% or $473 million increase

over the previous year.

Bank service fee income from businesses accounted for 64.3% of all bank service fee income over the past year(2012). Households accounted for 35.7% of bank service fee revenue.

The 64.3% contribution from businesses is the highest contribution since the first year of the survey (1997).

Small businesses accounted for 52.4% of bank service fee revenue from businesses in 2012, down significantly

from 63%-65% in the early years of the survey (prior to 2001). Correspondingly, the contribution from large

businesses has increased from 35%-37% prior to 2001 and has been between 47%-48% over the most recent

three years.

The very large number of small businesses, around 2 million, in comparison to 90,000 medium and large

businesses, is one factor that causes fees paid by small businesses to exceed that of large businesses. For

example, small businesses pay 2.5 times the amount of fees on deposit accounts than large businesses. A similar

result occurs for merchant fees where small businesses pay 2.4 times the level of fees when compared with large

businesses.

Over the three years prior to the onset of the global financial crisis, growth rates for bank service fee revenue from

businesses were low. In fact, in 2004, there was a fall of 3.5%, driven by a large 17% or $310 million fall in

merchant fees. For 2005 and 2006, there were small increases in bank fees paid by businesses of 3.1% and 1.7%

respectively.

In the three years after the onset of the global financial crisis (2008, 2009 and 2010), growth in bank service fee

revenue from businesses averaged 9.8% per year. During this time, businesses increasingly turned to banks to

support their financing needs as other markets tightened or closed entirely.

Chart 8.1Bank service fee revenue from businesses (%change)


29/42


2013 Report

29

For small businesses, there was a 5.7% increase in bank service fee revenue this year, while for large businesses

growth was 8.3%.

Over the past three years, average annual growth in fees from large businesses has 9.8% compared with 6.2% for

small businesses.

Table 8.1Bank service fee revenue from businesses

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Small Business $2,754 $2,788 $3,060 $3,211 $3,190 $3,398 $3,612 $3,818

. change $99 $35 $272 $151 -$21 $208 $214 $206

. %change 3.7% 1.3% 9.7% 4.9% -0.6% 6.5% 6.3% 5.7%

Large business $1,831 $1,873 $1,862 $2,063 $2,634 $3,122 $3,201 $3,467

. change $40 $42 -$11 $201 $571 $488 $79 $266

. %change 2.3% 2.3% -0.6% 10.8% 27.7% 18.5% 2.5% 8.3%

Total $4,585 $4,661 $4,922 $5,274 $5,824 $6,520 $6,812 $7,285

. change $140 $76 $261 $352 $550 $696 $292 $473

. %change 3.1% 1.7% 5.6% 7.2% 10.4% 11.9% 4.5% 6.9%

Results at the broad product level were:

Deposit accounts - fees on deposit accountsin 2012 saw a $1 million fall to $623 million, the lowest level

since 1999. Even though the fall this year was small it is the fifth consecutive year in which bank service

fee revenue has fallen for business deposit accounts. Over that period, fees have fallen by $212 million or

25%.

Business loans - after experiencing growth rates of over 20% in both 2009 and 2010, fees from bank loans,have been growing at a much slower pace over the past two years 4.8% in 2011 and 10.4% in 2012 . The

significant increase in loan fees paid by large businesses over 2009 and 2010 was a direct result of the

global financial crisis. As global capital markets became severely constrained and corporate treasuries

closed, businesses approached banks for their funding needs. This year, 2012, the increase in fees of

$293 million or 10.4% reflects a 6.6% growth in business loan outstandings over the year compared to

0.3% over the previous year. More so, nearly 80% of the increase in business loan fees in 2012 was paid

by large businesses.

Large businesses accounted for 63% of bank service fee revenue from business loans this year.

Merchant fees - merchant fees increased by 8.2% over the past year to $2.1 billion. The combined number

of credit card and EFTPOS transactions, however, increased by 11.1% over the same year. Merchant feereform saw merchant fees fall by $343 million or 19% over 2004 and 2005.


30/42


2013 Report

30

Readers should note that there has been extensive reclassification and recategorisation of component fees for

bank bills which resulted in major revisions to these data in 2010. It is expected that these changes may have

impacted on the growth rate for 2010. Bank fees paid by businesses, for bank bills, increased by 73% in 2010 and

were 11% this year.

Table 8.2Bank service fee revenue paid by businesses by product

ALL Businesses 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Deposit Accounts $812 $835 $808 $708 $646 $624 $623

. change $5 $23 -$27 -$100 -$62 -$22 -$1

. %change 0.7% 2.8% -3.2% -12.4% -8.8% -3.4% -0.1%

Loans $1,601 $1,671 $1,821 $2,244 $2,703 $2,834 $3,127

. change $46 $70 $150 $423 $459 $130 $293

. %change 3.0% 4.4% 9.0% 23.2% 20.5% 4.8% 10.4%

Merchant Fees $1,502 $1,632 $1,743 $1,813 $1,853 $1,910 $2,068

. change $19 $130 $111 $70 $39 $58 $158

. %change 1.3% 8.7% 6.8% 4.0% 2.2% 3.1% 8.2%

Bank Bills $68 $73 $98 $108 $187 $236 $262

. change $3 $5 $26 $10 $79 $50 $26

. %change 5.0% 6.6% 35.2% 9.7% 73.0% 26.5% 11.0%

Other $678 $711 $804 $951 $1,131 $1,208 $1,204

. change $2 $34 $93 $147 $180 $77 -$3

. %change 0.3% 5.0% 13.0% 18.3% 19.0% 6.8% -0.3%

Total $4,661 $4,922 $5,274 $5,824 $6,520 $6,812 $7,285

. change $76 $261 $352 $550 $696 $292 $473

. %change 1.7% 5.6% 7.2% 10.4% 11.9% 4.5% 6.9%

Over 2012, bank service fee revenue from business loans accounted for 43% of total bank service fee revenue

from businesses, the highest contribution, from this category, on record. Fees from business loans have been the

highest contributor to total bank fees from businesses for the past eight years (from 2005). Merchant fees were the

highest contributor for six years prior to that (1999-2004).

In 2012, merchant fees were the second highest category of fees from businesses at 28%.

Fees from deposit accounts held by businesses made up 9% of bank service fees from businesses in 2012, the

lowest proportion on record. For eleven years, from 1997 to 2007, deposit accounts contributed 16% to 20% to

total bank service fee revenue from businesses.

Chart 8.2Bank service fee revenue from businesses


31/42


2013 Report

31

Over all five years shown in the chart below, 2008 to 2012, fees from business loans were the highest contributor

to bank service fee revenue from businesses while merchant service fees were the second highest contributor.

Chart 8.3Contribution to bank service fee revenue from businesses

The chart below shows that banks business loan outstandings were $655 billion at the end of June 2012 compared

with $615 billion at the end of June 2011 growing by 6.6% over the year. This was the strongest growth in three

and a half years.

The chart shows that the total volume of business loan outstandings is at near record levels.

Chart 8.4Business loan outstandings (banks)


32/42


2013 Report

32

The ratio of total bank service fee revenue from businesses loans to total loan outstandings for businesses fell, in

trend terms, over the period 2001 to 2008 but has turned upwards over the past three years.

Even though there has been an uptick in the ratio, it remains lower than the average for the first half of the decade.

Chart 8.5Ratio of bank service fee revenue from businesses loans to business loan outstandings


33/42


2013 Report

33

9. Exception fees

This is the fifth year that exception fees data have been collected as part of the annual Bank Fees Survey.

Over 2012, a total of $654 million of exception fees were paid by households and businesses. This was a small

increase of 2.6% or $17 million over the previous year.

In 2012, households paid $572 million in exception fees while businesses paid $81 million.

Over the previous two years, 2010 and 2011, there were very large falls in exception fees. In that time, total

exception fees fell by $853 million or 57%. For households, the fall over 2010 and 2011 was $743 million or 57%

while for businesses it was $110 million or 56%.

This year, as with last year, exception fees accounted for 5.8% of all bank service fee revenue, compared with over

13% for the first two years of the survey.

Table 9.1Summary of exception fees

Exception fees 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

1. Households $1,184 $1,293 $654 $550 $572

Transaction accounts $688 $674 $292 $233 $258

Other accounts $13 $11 $2 $2 $3

Loans $483 $608 $360 $315 $312

. Housing $34 $54 $34 $36 $35

. Personal $34 $42 $33 $24 $25

. Credit cards $415 $510 $293 $255 $251

Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

2. Business $203 $197 $112 $87 $81

Small Business $174 $164 $96 $74 $69

Deposits $121 $113 $54 $43 $39Loans $53 $52 $42 $31 $29

Merchant fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Bank bills $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Large Business $29 $33 $16 $13 $13

Deposits $11 $10 $6 $7 $6

Loans $18 $23 $10 $7 $7

Merchant fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Bank bills $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

3. Total $1,387 $1,490 $766 $637 $654

For households, exception fees on transaction accounts have fallen by $721 million or 56% over the past three

years.

Exception fees across all loan products for households have fallen by 49% or $296 million over the past three

years. In particular, exception fees on credit cards have fallen by $259 million or 51%.

For businesses, exception fees have fallen by $116 million over the past three years with small businesses

accounting for the vast majority of that fall, being 82% or $95 million. In terms of the actual fall in fees for small

businesses over that time, it has been from $164 million in 2009 to $69 million in 2012, a fall of 58%.


34/42


2013 Report

34

Table 9.2Change in exception fees over past three years to 2012

Exception fees 2010 2011 2012 3 years %3 years

1. Households -$639 -$104 $22 -$721 -56%

Transaction accounts -$382 -$59 $25 -$416 -62%

Other accounts -$9 $0 $1 -$8 -76%

Loans -$247 -$45 -$4 -$296 -49%

. Housing -$19 $2 -$1 -$19 -34%

. Personal -$9 -$9 $1 -$17 -40%

. Credit cards -$217 -$38 -$4 -$259 -51%

2. Business -$85 -$31 $0 -$115 -59%

Small Business -$68 -$29 $1 -$96 -58%

Deposits -$59 -$18 $3 -$73 -65%

Loans -$9 -$11 -$2 -$22 -44%

Large Business -$17 -$2 -$1 -$20 -60%

Deposits -$4 $1 $0 -$4 -38%

Loans -$13 -$3 -$1 -$16 -70%

3. Total -$724 -$135 $23 -$836 -56%

In 2012, exception fees represented 0.8% of banks total operating income, unchanged from the previous year. In

2008 and 2009, the ratio was much higher, above 2.0%.

Chart 9.1Exception fees as a % of operating income


35/42


2013 Report

35

At $258 million in 2012, exception fees on household transaction accounts were 0.05% of total household deposits,the same as the previous year, 2011. This ratio was over three times that level in 2008 and 2009.

Chart 9.2Households: Exception fees on household transaction accounts as a % of deposits

Table 9.3 shows exception fees as a proportion of the outstanding balances for each product category. Apart from

being very low for each product, the proportions over the most recent three three years have been much lower than

for the first two years (2008 and 2009).

Table 9.3Exception fees as a proportion of balances

Exception fees as % of balances

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

1. Households

Transaction accounts 0.207% 0.166% 0.065% 0.048% 0.049%

Loans 0.062% 0.069% 0.036% 0.029% 0.028%

. Housing 0.005% 0.007% 0.004% 0.004% 0.003%

. Personal 0.043% 0.061% 0.049% 0.037% 0.041%

. Credit cards 1.272% 1.467% 0.792% 0.648% 0.619%

2. Business

Deposits 0.052% 0.042% 0.019% 0.011% 0.011%

Loans 0.021% 0.019% 0.014% 0.011% 0.010%

Household and businesses make enormous use of their transaction accounts and credit cards. In terms of

transaction accounts, over the 12 months ending June 2012, $15.1 trillion was transacted using ATMs, EFTPOS,

Direct Entry and Cheques.

In 2012, $255.8 billion worth of credit card transactions took place. Exception fees as a proportion of credit cardspending was 0.10% a significant fall from 0.21% three years ago.

Table 9.3Exception fees as a proportion of transaction value

Exception feesValue of

transactions% of value oftransactions

$m $bn

Transaction accounts $258 $15,085 0.002%

Credit cards $251 $255.8 0.10%


36/42


2013 Report

36

10. Bank service fees and low-income earners

Household vary in their capacity to pay bank fees and this raises the issue of access to banking services across

households. As such, a group of consumers requiring particular consideration are those on low incomes.

An analysis of data from the ABS Household Expenditure Survey reveals that lower-income households pay a

lower share of fees on their bank accounts than consumers with high incomes.

The data shows that the lowest three income quintiles contributed 14% each to the total duties, taxes and charges

on financial institution accounts over the 2009-10 financial years. The two highest income quintiles paid double

that, at 29% each.

Readers should note that ABS have flagged that the estimate for the lowest income quintile has a high relative

standard error.

Table 10.1Duties, taxes and charges on financial accounts

Average weekly expenditure 2009-10 Gross Household Income Quintile

Lowest Second Third Fourth Highest All

Total Duties, taxes, charges on financial inst accts $1.54 $1.50 $1.52 $3.07 $3.09 $2.15%Share 14% 14% 14% 29% 29%

Total weekly household expenditure 2009-10 $559 $815 $1,169 $1,479 $2,160 $1,236

% on Duties, taxes, charges on financial inst accts 0.28% 0.18% 0.13% 0.21% 0.14% 0.17%

Source: ABS 2009-10 Household Expenditure Survey

The chart below shows the share of the total expenditure on financial institution account charges across the five

income quintiles.

Chart 10.1Proportion of financial charges paid by income quintile

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Lowest Second Third Fourth Highest

Households - share of duties taxes and charges of

financial institution accounts paid

Over the six years between the two ABS household expenditure surveys, the percentage of weekly spending on

duties, taxes and charges on financial institution accounts by the lowest income quintile has fallen from 0.34% (in

2003-04) to 0.28% (in 2009-10).


37/42


2013 Report

37

Chart 10.2Proportion of average weekly income paid on financial charges by lowest income quintile

0.0%

0.1%

0.2%

0.3%

0.4%

2003-04 2009-10

Lowest income quintile - proportion of weekly

expenditure on duties, taxes and charges on FI accounts


38/42


2013 Report

38

11. Financial services prices

The Australian Bureau of Statistics produces a comprehensive measure of price change for financial services as

part of the quarterly Consumer Price Index. This measure was first included in the CPI from 2005. The ABS

measure includes bank fees, interest payments and other charges as well as transaction volumes in order to

capture the price change in the most comprehensive way.

Changes to the ABS methodology for producing a measure of financial services price change have meant that ABS

has restarted this data series from 2011.

Over the 12 months ending June 2012, the price of financial services increased by 1.3%, compared with an

increase of 1.2% for the overall CPI.

The price of the key banking services - deposit and loan facilities - increased by only 0.1% over the year ending

June 2012.

Table 11.1Price changes: Financial Services and CPI

Financial Services

% changeDeposit and

loan facilitiesOther financial

servicesTotal financial

services CPI

Sep-11 -0.5% -0.1% -0.2% 0.6%

Dec-11 0.1% 0.5% 0.4% 0.0%

Mar-12 0.3% 0.9% 0.8% 0.1%

Jun-12 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.5%

Total for 12 months 0.1% 1.6% 1.3% 1.2%

The CPI allows comparison of price change across a broad range of items of household expenditure. The table

below shows the price changes for a range of common items of expenditure by households. It shows that the

increase in the price of financial services was low when compared with other items, over the 12 months endingJune 2012.

Table 11.2Price comparisons

Price change to June 2012 %

Electricity 10.7%

Child care 9.9%

Gas and other household fuels 8.0%

Secondary education 7.7%

Water & sewerage 6.1%

Preschool and primary education 5.8%

Property rates and charges 5.3%

Urban transport fares 5.2%

Rent 4.4%

Health 3.6%

Automotive fuel 2.7%

Financial services 1.3%

Communication 0.9%

Food -3.2%


39/42


2013 Report

39

12.Bank service points and improvements

Bank service fee revenue is income for services provided by banks. As such, it would seem reasonable that

customers would expect to receive good service from banks, along with improvements to banking products and

services over time.

As at the end of June 2012, banks maintained 5,783 branches making up 85% of all branch locations for banking

services in Australia. Branch numbers have increased for the past eleven consecutive years, since 2001. In thattime, there has been a net increase of 994 branches, a 21% increase in branches.

Banks provide a further 2,135 service points such as agencies, rural financial centres and other; while Bank@Post

now has 3,250 service points.

Access to banking services at ATMs or through EFTPOS has shown solid growth over recent years.

Table 12.1: Summary of bank service channels

Jun-12

Face-to-face: Total

Banks 7,918Building Societies 298

Credit Unions 908

Other ADIs 1

Bank@Post 3,250

Total: All ADIs 12,375

Face-to-face: Branch Level

Banks 5,783

Building Societies 258

Credit Unions 767

Other ADIs 1

Subtotal: Branch 6,809

Face-to-face: Other

Banks 2,135

Building Societies 40

Credit Unions 141

Other ADIs 0

Bank@Post 3,250

Subtotal: Other 5,566

ATMs 30,511

EFTPOS 764,549

Source: APRA re: face-to-face channels, APCA re: ATMs and EFTPOS
mailto:Bank@Postmailto:Bank@Posthttp://c/Users/heather.wellard/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/OLK3/ABA-%23Sheet5!%23REF!%23RANGE!%23REF!http://c/Users/heather.wellard/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/OLK3/ABA-%23Sheet5!%23REF!%23RANGE!%23REF!http://c/Users/heather.wellard/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/OLK3/ABA-%23Sheet5!%23REF!%23RANGE!%23REF!mailto:Bank@Postmailto:Bank@Post


40/42


2013 Report

40

In terms of improvement to bank services, banks continuing investment in technology provides customers with a

range of service channels and accessibility to bank services. The huge volumes of transactions supported by bank

systems are evident in Table 7.1.

This investment in improving customer experience is an ongoing process for banks. Some of the recent

innovations and achievements are:

Internet and mobile phone banking - innovations continue in internet and mobile phone banking. An increasinglevel of information is being made available to customers so that they can manage their own finances directly.

These include detailed statements for personal transaction and investment accounts, home loans and credit

cards, and a wide variety of tips and information on the use of financial products.

ATMs banks have been refreshing their ATM fleets to meet new compliance requirements. The new ATMs

provide features such as bigger screens, faster response times and graphics to improve customer usability, as

well as better security through anti-skimming and other technologies.

New products and services banking is a very competitive environment and banks are continually

investigating ways to enhance or design products and services improvements to suit the needs of a very

diverse consumer market and business environment.

Security and fraud - ongoing improvements to protection for customers, through state-of-the art security

technology, which keeps fraud incident rates at very low levels.

New branches as stated above, this year (the 12 months to the end of June 2012) was the eleventh

consecutive year over which banks have increased their branch level of service adding 994 new branches or a

21% increase over this time. In the last year alone, bank branches increased by 212 branches (much of this

was as a result of credit unions and building societies becoming banks over that period).

Access in remote areas - all three categories of lesser accessibility (i.e. areas classified as moderately

accessible, remote and very remote) have seen average annual growth rates (over the past five years) in bank

branches and other face-to-face service presence higher than that for the more accessible areas (i.e. highly

accessible and accessible). In 2012, banks made up 91% of branches in moderately accessible areas, 90% in

remote areas and 53% in very remote areas.

Extended trading and mobile banking - many banks are offering weekend and extended trading hours, as well

as mobile banking services for home lending and other products.

Customer service technology ongoing investment in customer service technology has resulted in moreefficient and more seamless client servicing.

Customer satisfaction data from Roy Morgan Research support the fact that banks have been improving customer

service. Over recent years, the data has shown a noticeable upward trend in customer satisfaction which was at a

record 78.2% at June 2012.


41/42


2013 Report

41

Appendix 1Bank service fee revenue from households

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Transaction Accounts $1,773 $1,873 $2,110 $1,862 $1,196 $1,079 $1,054

. change $144 $100 $237 -$248 -$666 -$116 -$25

. %change 8.9% 5.6% 12.7% -11.7% -35.8% -9.7% -2.3%

Other Accounts $81 $81 $85 $76 $55 $61 $51

. change $7 $0 $4 -$8 -$21 $5 -$9

. %change 9.9% -0.6% 5.4% -9.9% -27.6% 9.8% -15.3%

Housing Loans $904 $1,088 $1,164 $1,381 $1,396 $1,239 $1,218

. change $88 $184 $76 $217 $15 -$156 -$21

. %change 10.8% 20.3% 7.0% 18.6% 1.1% -11.2% -1.7%

Personal Loans $280 $304 $313 $343 $326 $300 $318

. change $24 $24 $9 $30 -$17 -$26 $18

. %change 9.3% 8.4% 3.0% 9.5% -5.0% -7.8% 5.9%

Credit Cards $1,075 $1,181 $1,313 $1,396 $1,245 $1,293 $1,312

. change $187 $106 $132 $82 -$151 $49 $19

. %change 21.0% 9.9% 11.2% 6.3% -10.8% 3.9% 1.5%

Other $67 $88 $107 $115 $106 $92 $98

. change -$14 $20 $20 $8 -$9 -$15 $7

. %change -16.9% 30.5% 22.3% 7.3% -7.4% -13.9% 7.1%

Total households $4,180 $4,614 $5,093 $5,173 $4,324 $4,064 $4,052

. change $437 $433 $479 $80 -$850 -$259 -$13

. %change 11.7% 10.4% 10.4% 1.6% -16.4% -6.0% -0.3%


42/42


2013 Report

Appendix 2Bank service fee revenue from businesses

ALL Businesses 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Deposit Accounts $812 $835 $808 $708 $646 $624 $623

. change $5 $23 -$27 -$100 -$62 -$22 -$1

. %change 0.7% 2.8% -3.2% -12.4% -8.8% -3.4% -0.1%

Loans $1,601 $1,671 $1,821 $2,244 $2,703 $2,834 $3,127

. change $46 $70 $150 $423 $459 $130 $293

. %change 3.0% 4.4% 9.0% 23.2% 20.5% 4.8% 10.4%

Merchant Fees $1,502 $1,632 $1,743 $1,813 $1,853 $1,910 $2,068

. change $19 $130 $111 $70 $39 $58 $158

. %change 1.3% 8.7% 6.8% 4.0% 2.2% 3.1% 8.2%

Bank Bills $68 $73 $98 $108 $187 $236 $262

. change $3 $5 $26 $10 $79 $50 $26

. %change 5.0% 6.6% 35.2% 9.7% 73.0% 26.5% 11.0%

Other $678 $711 $804 $951 $1,131 $1,208 $1,204

. change $2 $34 $93 $147 $180 $77 -$3

. %change 0.3% 5.0% 13.0% 18.3% 19.0% 6.8% -0.3%

Total $4,661 $4,922 $5,274 $5,824 $6,520 $6,812 $7,285

. change $76 $261 $352 $550 $696 $292 $473

. %change 1.7% 5.6% 7.2% 10.4% 11.9% 4.5% 6.9%