FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFF I CE OF

THE CHAIRMAN

The Honorable Betty McCollum U.S. House ofRepresentatives 2256 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congresswoman McCollum:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21 st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission' s recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2- The Honorable Betty McCollum

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can- and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely/ ; · j

J;;:U/1~1~ Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF

THE CHAIRMAN

The Honorable Jim McDermott U.S. House of Representatives 1035 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman McDermott:

March 21 , 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record ofthe proceeding and considered as part of the Commission' s review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21 51 century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues ' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission' s recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2- The Honorable Jim McDermott

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can-and must- have both. And we can- and must-do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely,/ j j ;;;: j1)1~/'-Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFF ICE OF

THE CHA I RM AN

The Honorable Jim McGovern U.S. House ofRepresentatives 438 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman McGovern:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21 st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Jim McGovern

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can-and must-have both. And we can- and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know ifl can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely j j / J;:U£1~1~ Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF

THE CHAIRMAN

The Honorable Gwen Moore U.S. House ofRepresentatives 2245 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congresswoman Moore:

March 21 , 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission' s efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission' s Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2- The Honorable Gwen Moore

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can- and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely/ j / j;:/1)1~1~ Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFF ICE OF

T HE CHA I RMAN

The Honorable Jerrold Nadler U.S. House ofRepresentatives 2109 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Nadler:

March 21 , 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remai~s a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2- The Honorable Jerrold Nadler

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can- and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know ifl can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely, / / j ~/4)1~/c-

Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF

THE CHAIRMAN

The Honorable Grace F. Napolitano U.S. House of Representatives 161 0 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congresswoman Napolitano:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission' s review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2- The Honorable Grace F. Napolitano

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can- and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely,/ j j

);: /d)!~/'-Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF

THE CH A I RMAN

The Honorable Rick Nolan U.S. House of Representatives 2366 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Nolan:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support ofthe Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Rick Nolan

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can- and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely, / j / J;:/411~1~

Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF

THE CH A IR MA N

The Honorable Eleanor Holmes Norton U.S. House ofRepresentatives 2136 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congresswoman Norton:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support ofthe Commission' s efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21 st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2- The Honorable Eleanor Holmes Norton

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can- and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF

THE C H AIRMAN

The Honorable Chellie Pingree U.S. House ofRepresentatives 2162 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congresswoman Pingree:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Chellie Pingree

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely i j j

b:/411~1~ Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFF ICE OF

THE CHA I RMAN

The Honorable Stacey Plaskett U.S. House ofRepresentatives 509 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congresswoman Plaskett:

March 21 , 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission' s review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21 st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission' s Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Stacey Plaskett

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can- and must-do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincere~y/ ; · /

}?;:/4#~1~ Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMM U N ICATI ONS COMMISSION

WA S HINGTON

OFF ICE OF

THE C H A I RMAN

The Honorable Mark Paean U.S. House ofRepresentatives 313 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Paean:

March 21 , 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission' s efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record ofthe proceeding and considered as part of the Commission' s review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today' s society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21 st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues ' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers ' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Mark Pocan

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind-to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely/ / /

Ja:ft/1~1~ Torn Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFF ICE OF

THE CH A I R M AN

The Honorable Charles B. Rangel U.S. House of Representatives 2354 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Rangel :

March 21 , 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission' s review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues ' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission' s recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2- The Honorable Charles B. Rangel

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can- and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely, / / j

b: ;/til~!'-Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF

THE CHA I RMAN

The Honorable Cedric L. Richmond U.S. House ofRepresentatives 240 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Richmond:

March 21,2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Cedric L. Richmond

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind-to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COM M UNICAT IONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFF ICE O F

T HE C HAI R MAN

The Honorable Tim Ryan U.S. House of Representatives 1421 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Ryan:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordabi1ity gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Tim Ryan

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can- and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFF ICE OF

THE CHA I RMAN

The Honorable Linda T. Sanchez U.S. House of Representatives 2329 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congresswoman Sanchez:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission' s efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission' s review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21 st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues ' consideration that would modernize the Commission' s Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity ofthe Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Linda T. Sanchez

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21 st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all ofthem. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind-to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can-and must-have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely/ j j

)?;:/1)1~/'-Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUN ICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFF I CE O F

THE CH A IRM A N

The Honorable Jan Schakowsky U.S. House of Representatives 2367 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congresswoman Schakowsky:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission' s review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission' s Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Jan Schakowsky

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind-to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must-have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFF I CE OF

THE CHAIRMAN

The Honorable Robert C. Scott U. S. House ofRepresentatives 1201 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Scott:

March 21 , 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission' s efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission' s review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21 st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission' s recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2- The Honorable Robert C. Scott

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind-to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must-have both. And we can- and must-do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTO N

OF FICE OF

T H E CH A IR MAN

The Honorable Jose E. Serrano U.S. House ofRepresentatives 2227 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Serrano:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21 st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding .

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Jose E. Serrano

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all ofthem. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely/ ; · j

J;:U#~I~ Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL CoMMUNICATIONs CoMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF

THE CH A I RM A N

The Honorable Terri A. Sewell U.S. House ofRepresentatives 1133 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congresswoman Sewell:

March 21,2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission' s review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21 st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2- The Honorable Terri A. Sewell

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind-to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISS ION

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF

T H E C H A I RMA N

The Honorable Brad Sherman U.S. House ofRepresentatives 2242 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Sherman:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers ' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Brad Sherman

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can-and must- have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely/ j j J;:/4#~/c-Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFFI C E O F

THE C H AI RM A N

The Honorable Louise M. Slaughter U.S. House ofRepresentatives 2469 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congresswoman Slaughter:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission' s review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Louise M. Slaughter

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind-to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can-and must-have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely,/ j j

J;:UJ!~I~ Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFF I CE OF

THE CHAIRMAN

The Honorable Mark Takai U.S. House ofRepresentatives 422 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Takai:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy ofuniversal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Mark Takai

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind-to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must-have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Sincerely,/ / j

J;:/411~1'-Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OF F ICE OF

TH E C H A I RMA N

The Honorable Mark Takano U.S. House ofRepresentatives 1507 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Takano:

March 21,2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission' s review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Mark Takano

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind-to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can-and must-have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUN ICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

O FF ICE OF

TH E C H A IR MAN

The Honorable Bennie Thompson U.S. House ofRepresentatives 2466 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Thompson:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Bennie Thompson

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21 st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind-to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNIC ATIONS COMM ISS ION

WASHINGTO N

OF F ICE OF

THE C H AIRMAN

The Honorable Dina Titus U.S. House ofRepresentatives 401 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congresswoman Titus:

March 21,2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today's society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity ofthe Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Dina Titus

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21 st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can- and must- have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Tom Wheeler

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

OFFICE O F

THE C H A I R M AN

The Honorable Paul Tonko U.S. House of Representatives 2463 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Tonko:

March 21, 2016

Thank you for your letter in support of the Commission's efforts to modernize the universal service Lifeline program. I share your desire to ensure that Lifeline continues to assist low income consumers with access to affordable communications services. Your views are very important and will be included in the record of the proceeding and considered as part of the Commission's review.

I wholeheartedly agree that broadband has evolved to become an essential vehicle for expanding access to information, health services, educational resources, and employment opportunities. And while it is clear that broadband has become essential in today' s society, affordability remains a major barrier to adoption by low-income consumers. That is why transforming Lifeline for the 21 st century is key to the future of this vital program.

Earlier this month, working closely with Commissioner Clyburn, I circulated a proposed Order for my colleagues' consideration that would modernize the Commission's Lifeline program to make broadband more affordable for low-income Americans. At the same time, the proposed Order would put in place a number of key programmatic reforms designed to protect the integrity of the Lifeline program and build on the Commission's recent efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The Order will be considered at the FCC's March 31 Open Meeting.

The proposed Order takes a number of the steps you recommend to address the broadband affordability gap. For example, for the first time, low income consumers could, as you suggest, apply the $9.25 per month support to stand-alone broadband service, as well as bundled voice and data service packages. In addition, the Order would free up the Lifeline marketplace to encourage wide participation in the program by broadband providers, giving consumers competitive service options. And the proposed Order would put in place minimum service standards to ensure that eligible subscribers' benefits are directed only to quality services that are worthy of universal service funding.

The Order also would take important steps to further ensure program integrity. Specifically, it would refine the list of federal programs that may be used to validate Lifeline eligibility to those that support electronic validation, are most accountable, and best identify people needing support (SNAP, SSI, Medicaid, Veterans Pension and Tribal), along with

Page 2-The Honorable Paul Tonko

income-based eligibility. The Order would also establish a National Eligibility Verifier that would remove telecommunications carriers from the process of making eligibility determinations. I expect that these changes will make Lifeline a truly 21st Century program that effectively and responsibly makes broadband service accessible for low-income households.

While the Order on circulation takes many of your recommended steps, I recognize that it may not take all of them. Nonetheless, I am heartened that we agree completely on the critical need to modernize the Lifeline program for a digital era and to do so as soon as possible. The proposed Lifeline Order was designed with two equally important goals in mind- to help connect low-income Americans to the Internet and to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program going forward. We need not choose between the two. We can-and must-have both. And we can-and must--do so now.

I appreciate your interest in this matter. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Tom Wheeler