fda's off-label guidance under fire
Post on 11-Dec-2016
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
Inpharma 1635 - 26 Apr 2008
FDA’s off-label guidance under fireProposed guidelines by the US FDA regarding
dissemination of journal articles that discuss off-labeluse of drugs have been criticised, according to an articlein JAMA.
The draft guidance was issued on February 15 andlays out core principles for companies to follow whendistributing journal articles, reprints or referencepublications. The material should be peer-reviewed andconflicts of interest should be fully disclosed. Accordingto critics, the draft guidance will allow companies to usepeer-reviewed journal articles that support off-label useof their products as a marketing tool. However, the FDAsays that it opposes the distribution of publicationsfunded by manufacturers of the products featured in thearticles. Dr Michael A Steinman, from the San FranciscoVA Medical Center, US, says that this guidance will leadto a lot of problems. "The fundamental issue is thatpeople are viewing reprints as science and they believethat science is objective, but industry uses research toadvance marketing goals."
According to JAMA, disseminating reprints ofscientific articles on off-label use does make sense; off-label drug use is appropriate in many cases, such as inrare diseases. However, off-label use occurs too often insettings where FDA-approved treatments are alreadyavailable. Critics are afraid that manufacturers willmanipulate data and publish trials that support off-labeluse of their products, and that the guidance undercutsthe incentive to conduct rigorous trials to obtain FDAapproval for an off-label use.
See also Inpharma 1634 p2; 801052524Mitka M. Critics say FDA’s off-label guidance allows marketing disguised asscience. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 299: 1759-1761,No. 15, 16 Apr 2008 801034998
1
Inpharma 26 Apr 2008 No. 16351173-8324/10/1635-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2010 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved