fbb benchmark 7 feb 2017
TRANSCRIPT
Pele Oy
Preface
This presentation aims to show a simple way to benchmark
the quality of FBB cartonboard (GC2) when only public
technical specifications are available.
The benchmarked quality characteristics and their weights
for the final evaluation are only my own judgement for a
general case of high quality boxboard printed in offset.
How to make high quality is not very much discussed here,
but I am interested and ready to receive consulting
assignments – not only about cartonboards but all areas of
paper and board manufacture.
My LinkedIn profile can be found by following this link:
https://fi.linkedin.com/pub/pekka-komulainen/12/896/a56
2
Pele Oy
SELECTED BRANDS AND BENCHMARKING
PRINCIPLES
3
Pele Oy
Boxboard definitions
4
Table: Stora Enso
Pele Oy
The importance of cartonboard quality
In the category of cartonboard no liquid packaging, cup or plate board is included.
According to CEPI the European consumption of cartonboards has been quite constant
after 2007 (about 7 Mton). White lined chipboard of this has been about 3.5 Mton and
FBB less than 2.5 Mton.
New high capacity virgin fiber multigrade board machines have just started or will be
started in the near future:
Metsä Board Husum 2016 400 000 t/a multigrades
Kotkamills 2016 400 000 t/a multigrades
BillerudKorsnäs 2019 550 000 t/a multigrades
Together with smaller rebuilds the new capacity of virgin fiber machines will be about
1.5 Mton, which is 60% of the European consumption.
Even if this capacity would mainly be directed to the food service sector, this is in the
beginning a huge addition to the cartonboard market. Last year Husum’s new machine
produced only about 100 000 tons (25% of the final capacity).
In addition, considerable amount of new containerboard capacity has been added.
In this clear overcapacity situation the quality of the product will be most important.
5
Pele Oy
Example of multigrade board machine start-up
Several new multigrade machines will produce FBB before focusing on food service
sector (Kotkamills, StoraEnso Beihai). The following is an example of SE Beihai:
6
Pele Oy
Typical wet end of a cartonboard machine
7
Three layers and hydraulic headboxes. Top wire unit for middle ply.
Two double felted presses and one smoothing press without felts for improving
smoothness.
Picture: Voith Paper
Pele Oy
Coating section of a cartonboard machine
Older slow machines can have MG dryer. New machines can have belt calender.
Normally base paper is surface sized and calendered before coating.
Typically there are 2-3 blade coatings for the top layer and one for the back layer.
After coating there is 1-2 soft calender nips and cooling before winding.
8
Picture: Voith Paper
Pele Oy
Layout of coated barrier board
After surface sizing there are two curtain coatings and one blade coating for printed
surface (Valmet Kotkamills). Each curtain coating can have two layers.
All coatings are on-machine coatings.
9
Picture: Kotkamills
Pele Oy
Opticom International Research rankings
The Brand Tracking Survey – Cartonboard for consumer packaging 2016 defining and
ranking the most valuable virgin fiber cartonboard brands in Western Europe according
to consumer goods brand owners:
10
2016 2014 2012 Pulp Wood
1 3 2 Incada FBB RMP SW Iggesund
2 1 3 Tambrite FBB PGW SW Stora Enso
3 2 1 Invercote SBB BHKP HW Iggesund
4 7 11 Carta range FBB CTMP HW Metsä Board
5 5 7 Simcote FBB GW/CTMP SW/HW Metsä Board
6 11 10 CKB SUB Kraft SW Stora Enso
7 6 5 Alaska Plus FBB CTMP HW/SW IP
8 8 8 Rochcoat/Blanc/Perle FBB Careo
10 9 9 Ensocoat SBB Kraft HW,SW Stora Enso
11 4 6 Performa FBB CTMP SW Stora Enso
Ranking Middle ply Brand
ownerBrand Rank 2016 Grade
Pele Oy
Benchmarking of FBB technical specifications
It is interesting to benchmark the best FBB grades only by using
public technical information and to compare that with Opticom’s
results.
Some grades are more common and interesting than the others.
To get most relevant results only FBB grades were chosen.
Of course Tambrite and Incada as the best brands must be
included. Simcote is also interesting due to the metal belt
calender.
Performa with triple coating top side must be included.
After Opticom’s 2014 benchmark International Paper has
launched a new lightweight grade Alaska Plus, which is
interesting to be included.
Relevant comparability can be reached between Tambrite,
Incada, Simcote, Performa Cream and Alaska Plus.
From the technical specifications it is difficult to get exactly same
grammages. The maximum difference in grammage has been ±5
gsm.
11
Pele Oy
Principles of benchmarking
Selected grammages are about 200 and 250 gsm.
The best brands have totally/partly integrated pulp production.
Importance of each property is weighed from 1 to 5. The
weights are:
5 for CD stiffness, 4 for internal bond and smoothness, 3 for bulk, 2
for gloss and 1 for low MD/CD anisotropy.
Bulk is important. However, it got only 3 points because it is
almost same as stiffness and stiffness is the final target.
For Scott bond delamination resistance 4 is given because it is
difficult to get bulk and internal bond at the same time.
Gloss is smoothness in micro scale, but smoothness is more
important – at least PPS in Europe.
Anisotropy is included to understand, how much CD stiffness is
made with lower orientation. Given weight for stiffness
anisotropy is only 1.
Performa probably has triple coated top side. Rest of the
grades are double coated. Back sides of the selected grades
are only surface sized (GC2).
12
Pele Oy
FBB brands and cartonboard quality
The trend has been lighter boxes, higher bulk and slightly lower gloss and smoothness.
It is interesting to note that softwood mechanical pulp made with conventional pulping
methods such as GW, PGW and RMP suits very well for middle ply.
13
Bulk Gloss Top
Pulp type Wood cm3/g CD, mNm MD/CD % coat
Tambrite PGW SW 200 350 1,75 5,0 1,80 1,2 n/a 130 2
Incada exel RMP SW 200 310 1,55 3,7 2,30 0,9 50 140 2
Performa cream CTMP SW 200 310 1,55 3,5 2,37 1,0 45 145 3
Simcote GW/CTMP SW/HW 200 350 1,75 4,7 2,23 1,4 35 n/a 2
Alaska Plus CTMP HW, SW 205 350 1,71 5,0 1,98 1,3 40 100 2
Bulk Gloss Top
Pulp type Wood cm3/g CD, mNm MD/CD % coat
Tambrite PGW SW 250 460 1,84 9,8 1,85 1,2 n/a 130 2
Incada exel RMP SW 255 450 1,76 8,3 2,31 0,9 50 140 2
Performa cream CTMP SW 245 405 1,65 6,9 2,28 1,0 45 145 3
Simcote GW/CTMP SW/HW 250 450 1,80 9,7 1,98 1,4 35 n/a 2
Alaska Plus CTMP HW, SW 255 470 1,84 10,0 2,01 1,3 40 100 2
FBB Brands Middle ply
gsmThickness
µm
Siffness, Taber PPS
µm
FBB Brands Middle ply
gsmThickness
µm
Siffness, Taber PPS
µm
Bond
J/m2
Bond
J/m2
Pele Oy
Benchmarking of FBB brands
Critical properties for benchmark must be important for the converter but also such that
improving one property has negative effect to some other properties.
For each property there must be weight of importance because some properties are more
important than the others. Weights are always dependent on converting and final usage of
the grade.
14
Low number is better
CD MD/CD
Tambrite 1 2 1 3 5 3 15
Incada exel 4 4 4 1 1 2 16
Performa cream 5 5 5 2 2 1 20
Simcote 2 3 3 5 4 5 22
Alaska Plus 2 1 2 4 3 4 16
CD MD/CD
Weihts 3 5 1 4 2 4
Tambrite 3 10 1 12 10 12 48
Incada exel 12 20 4 4 2 8 50
Performa cream 15 25 5 8 4 4 61
Simcote 6 15 3 20 8 20 72
Alaska Plus 6 5 2 16 6 16 51
BulkStiffness
PPS Gloss Bond Total
Bond Total
Final points
Bacis point BulkStiffness
PPS Gloss
Pele Oy
Comparison of Opticom’s rank and technical rank
Opticom’s ranking in 2016 seems to be slightly different compared to the technical
ranking. Alaska Plus has improved technically but not in Opticom ranking.
Selected grades are all good. If you need an overall good grade it is Tambrite. If you
need gloss and smoothness it is Incada. If you need Scott Bond take Performa. Alaska
is good for CD stiffness but has low internal bond and smoothness.
If you need tonnage take Simcote but check internal bond.
15
Tambrite 48 1
Incada exel 50 2
Alaska Plus 51 3
Performa cream 61 4
Simcote 72 5
FBB Technical
Rank 2016
Final
rank
Total
points2016 2014 2012
1 3 2 Incada
2 1 3 Tambrite
3 2 1 Invercote
4 7 11 Carta range
5 5 7 Simcote
6 11 10 CKB
7 6 5 Alaska Plus
8 8 8 Rochcoat/Blanc/Perle
10 9 9 Ensocoat
11 4 6 Performa
Opticom RankBrand Rank 2016
Pele Oy
Discussion of the benchmark criteria
For every converter or brand owner the weight of the scores is different. This
benchmarking tries to be an example of overall benchmark.
For example gloss is very important in Asia and North America. Expensive kaolin clay
or even more expensive pigments must be used there.
Everybody should consider how consistent are the quality numbers of each supplier.
As an example I would like to take PPS roughness and look what are the published
tolerances.
16
Avg. of nominal
and maximum
Tambrite 1,2 ≤1,5 ≤1,35
Incada exel 0,9 ≤1,3 ≤1,10
Alaska Plus 1,3 <1,3 <1,30
Performa cream 1,0 ≤1,7 ≤1,35
Simcote 1,4 <1,4 <1,40
Roughness PPS Tolerance
Pele Oy
Benchmarking with tolerances
Some tolerances are very wide. It is interesting to see if the ranking is
same with tolerances.
Below are the critical properties with worst numbers from tolerances.
17
Bulk Gloss Top
Pulp type Wood cm3/g CD, mNm MD/CD % coat
Tambrite PGW SW 200 350 1.68 4.5 1.80 1.5 n/a 100 2
Incada exel RMP SW 200 310 1.49 3.1 2.30 1.3 40 95 2
Performa cream CTMP SW 200 310 1.47 3.0 2.37 1.7 45 100 3
Simcote GW/CTMP SW/HW 200 350 1.70 4.2 2.23 1.4 33 n/a 2
Alaska Plus CTMP HW, SW 205 350 1.64 4.3 1.98 1.3 40 n/a 2
Bulk Glos Top
Pulp type Wood cm3/g CD, mNm MD/CD % coat
Tambrite PGW SW 250 460 1.77 8.8 1.85 1.5 n/a 100 2
Incada exel RMP SW 255 450 1.69 7.2 2.31 1.3 40 95 2
Performa cream CTMP SW 245 405 1.57 5.8 2.28 1.7 45 100 3
Simcote GW/CTMP SW/HW 250 450 1.75 8.7 1.98 1.4 33 n/a 2
Alaska Plus CTMP HW, SW 255 470 1.77 8.7 2.01 1.3 40 n/a 2
FBB Brands Middle ply
gsmThicknes
s µm
Siffness, Taber PPS
µm
Bond
J/m2
Bond
J/m2FBB Brands Middle ply
gsmThickness
µm
Siffness, Taber PPS
µm
Pele Oy
Benchmarking of FBB brands with tolerances
It seems that Tambrite is still the best. Simcote is better than Performa cream when
tolerances are taken into account. Alaska plus is also better than Incada with tolerances.
Anyway, the best and worst are the same brands as without tolerances.
18
Low number is better
CD MD/CD
Tambrite 1 1 1 4 5 1 13
Incada exel 4 4 4 1 2 3 18
Performa cream 5 5 5 5 1 1 22
Simcote 1 3 3 3 4 4 18
Alaska Plus 3 2 2 1 2 4 14
CD MD/CD
Weihts 3 5 1 4 2 4
Tambrite 3 5 1 16 10 4 39
Incada exel 12 20 4 4 4 12 56
Performa cream 15 25 5 20 2 4 71
Simcote 3 15 3 12 8 16 57
Alaska Plus 9 10 2 4 4 16 45
Gloss
Total
Bond Total
Final points
Bacis point BulkStiffness
PPS
BulkStiffness
PPS Gloss Bond
Pele Oy
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN IGT AND SCOTT BOND
19
Pele Oy
Surface strength and delamination
If coating layer is not strong enough, the
tacky ink pulls parts of coating away.
This is not very common case for FBB.
When coating and top ply are strong
enough, there will be delamination
between top ply and filler ply. This is
most common case with bulky FBB
cartonboards.
20
Pele Oy
Offset printing nip
Ink splitting causes high stresses close to the top surface in offset printing.
21
Picture: KTH Lecture 8
Pele Oy
IGT test
IGT test measures only force but not
deformation.
In the commercial offset printing nip the stress is
quite similar with IGT test.
The failure of the paperboard can be:
1. detachment of smaller particles of only coating or
coating and fibers or coating and top ply
2. delamination between base board plies without
total separation (corrugated surface)
3. total separation of base board plies.
22
Pele Oy
Scott bond test
When IGT measures only force, Scott bond measures energy i.e. the area under the
stress-strain curve. In the picture below are two Scott bond tests, where max. force
is same but total energy very different.
23Picture: KTH Lecture 8
Pele Oy
Summary of comparison IGT vs. Scott Bond
IGT measures only force but not deformation. Scott Bond measures
energy i.e. force and deformation.
IGT measures similar forces as printing nip i.e. combination of
pulling and shear forces. Scott bond measures shear force, which is
not as important for printing as pulling force in the nip.
IGT loads mainly the top side of the sheet while Scott bond is
symmetric through the whole sheet.
Scott bond finds the weakest layer in z-direction, which normally is
between filler ply and back ply (top/wire-side joint). IGT stresses top
side more, and if the delamination is in the base board, it normally is
between top ply and filler ply.
If IGT test shows base board delamination, it is important to
increase the bond between top ply and filler ply, which may not be
critical at all in Scott bond test.
All this means that the correlation between Scott bond and IGT can
be very poor.
24
To
p s
ide
wit
h c
oa
tin
g
Delamination
Pele Oy
Balance of board properties
Good stiffness is very important when lighter weight cartonboards are used. When
bulk is improved, internal bond can decrease and delamination problems are
possible.
The only reason why Scott bond is used for benchmarking is that all suppliers
specify Scott bond. However, studies should be made by using special IGT tests.
25
Bulk
Stiffness Good level
Bad level
Bond
Smoothness
Delamination
Pele Oy
ORIGINAL AND CALCULATED QUALITY
SPECIFICATIONS BY GRAMMAGE
26
Pele Oy
Tambrite by Stora Enso Inkeroinen mill
Tambrite specification shows improved bulk but decreased smoothness.
Good CD stiffness due to low fiber orientation
Balanced properties but no gloss specified
Wide tolerances
27
Property Unit Standard Toler.
Grammage g/m² ISO 536 ± 4% 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 285 310 335
Thickness µm ISO 534 ± 4%, ±20 350 375 400 420 440 460 480 500 540 600 650
Bulk cm3/g Calculated 1,75 1,79 1,82 1,83 1,83 1,84 1,85 1,85 1,89 1,94 1,94
Bending moment CD mNm Taber 15° ISO 2493 -0,1 5,0 5,9 6,8 7,8 8,8 9,8 11,0 12,3 14,6 18,5 22,4
Bending moment MD mNm Taber 15° ISO 2493 -0,1 9,0 10,7 12,4 14,3 16,2 18,1 20,5 23,0 27,6 35,5 43,7
Bending moment MD/CD Calculated 1,80 1,81 1,82 1,83 1,84 1,85 1,86 1,87 1,89 1,92 1,95
Roughness top PPS10 ISO 879 Max. 1,5 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2
Brightness top %, Illumination C/2° ISO 2470 ± 2 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86
Gloss %, Hunter 75° TAPPI T 480
Values
Pele Oy
Tambrite original specification
28
Pele Oy
Incada Exel by Iggesund Workington mill
Tambrite did not specify gloss. It is good that Incada has all of the specified figures
even if the tolerances are wide.
The press section rebuild cannot be seen on the quality specification.
29
Property Unit Standard Toler.
Grammage g/m² ISO 536 ± 4% 200 210 225 235 255 280 300 325 350
Thickness µm ISO 534 ± 4% 310 340 375 400 450 490 540 590 640
Bulk cm3/g Calculated 1,55 1,62 1,67 1,70 1,76 1,75 1,80 1,82 1,83
Bending stiffness CD mNm Taber 15° ISO 2493 -15 % 3,7 4,6 5,9 6,6 8,5 10,8 13,2 16,8 19,8
Bending stiffness MD mNm Taber 15° ISO 2493 -15 % 8,5 10,6 13,6 15,2 19,6 24,9 30,3 38,7 45,5
Bending stiffness MD/CD Calculated 2,30 2,30 2,31 2,30 2,31 2,31 2,30 2,30 2,30
Internal bond (Scott) J/m2 TAPPI 569 ≥95 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140
Roughness top PPS10 ISO 8791-4 ≤1,3 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9
Brightness top %, Illumination C/2° ISO 2470 ± 2 91,5 91,5 91,5 91,5 91,5 91,5 91,5 91,5 91,5
Gloss top 75°, % ISO B254-1 -10 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Values
Pele Oy
Double coated Incada Exel by Iggesund
30
Pele Oy
Performa Cream by Stora Enso Fors mill
Some tolerances are very wide such as in roughness and Scott bond.
There is no gloss tolerance available.
Bulk and stiffness are low due to the thicker total coating.
31
Property Unit Standard Toler.
Grammage g/m² ISO 536 ± 4% 200 220 230 245 260 290 315 340 360
Thickness µm ISO 534 ± 4% 310 340 360 405 440 500 560 610 650
Bulk cm3/g Calculated 1,55 1,55 1,57 1,65 1,69 1,72 1,78 1,79 1,81
Bending stiffness CD mNm Taber 15° ISO 2493 -15 % 3,5 4,5 5,4 6,8 8,2 11,1 14,5 18,1 20,3
Bending stiffness MD mNm Taber 15° ISO 2493 -15 % 8,3 10,8 12,8 15,5 18,6 24,6 32,4 39,8 44,9
Bending stiffness MD/CD Calculated 2,37 2,40 2,37 2,28 2,27 2,22 2,23 2,20 2,21
Internal bond (Scott) J/m2 TAPPI 569 ≥100 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145
Roughness top PPS10 ISO 8791-4 ≤1,7 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0
Brightness top %, Illumination C/2° ISO 2470 ± 1 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Gloss top 75°, % Tappi 480 n/a 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
Values
Pele Oy
Performa Cream – triple coated top
32
Pele Oy
Alaska Plus by IP Kwidzyn
Alaska Plus has reduced gloss from 45 to 40% from the former Alaska, but bulk
and stiffness are very much improved.
For roughness, gloss, and internal bond no tolerances are given.
33
Property Unit Standard Toler.
Grammage g/m² ISO 536 ± 4% 190 205 220 235 255 270 280 305 330
Thickness µm ISO 534 ± 4% 320 350 385 425 470 500 520 570 620
Bulk cm3/g Calculated 1,68 1,71 1,75 1,81 1,84 1,85 1,86 1,87 1,88
Bending stiffness CD mNm Taber 15° ISO 2493 ± 15% 3,9 5,1 6,2 7,7 10,2 11,6 13,1 16,1 19,8
Bending stiffness MD mNm Taber 15° ISO 2493 ± 15% 7,7 10,1 12,5 16,0 20,5 24,3 27,0 35,0 44,9
Bending stiffness MD/CD Calculated 1,97 1,98 2,02 2,08 2,01 2,09 2,06 2,17 2,27
Internal bond (Scott) J/m2 TAPPI 569 >100 >100 >100 >100 >100 >100 >100 >100 >100 >100
Roughness top PPS10 ISO 8791-4 <1,3 <1,3 <1,3 <1,3 <1,3 <1,3 <1,3 <1,3 <1,3
Brightness top %, Illumination C/2° ISO 2470 ± 1 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Gloss top 75°, % Tappi 480 >40 >40 >40 >40 >40 >40 >40 >40 >40
Values
Pele Oy
Alaska Plus by International Paper Kwidzyn
34
Pele Oy
Metsä Board Simcote FBB
Good bulk due to metal belt calender for base board
Roughness is not the best
Anisotropy is quite high
Internal bond strength is not published
35
Property Unit Standard Toler.
Grammage g/m² ISO 536 ± 2% 200 210 225 235 250 260 275 290 315 340
Thickness mm ISO 534 ± 3% 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 550 600 650
Bulk cm3/g Calculated 1,75 1,79 1,78 1,81 1,80 1,83 1,82 1,90 1,90 1,91
Bending stiffness CD mNm Taber 15° ISO 2493 ± 10% 4,7 5,8 7,0 8,4 9,7 11,0 12,6 15,8 18,9 22,1
Bending stiffness MD mNm Taber 15° ISO 2493 ± 10% 10,5 12,1 15,0 17,0 19,2 22,6 25,2 31,0 37,8 45,2
Bending stiffness MD/CD Calculated 2,23 2,09 2,14 2,02 1,98 2,05 2,00 1,96 2,00 2,05
Roughness top PPS10 ISO 879 Max. 1,4 1,4 1,4 1,4 1,4 1,4 1,4 1,4 1,4 1,4
Brightness top %, Illumination C/2° ISO 2470 ± 1 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84
Gloss %, Hunter 75° TAPPI T 480 ± 5 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Values
Pele Oy
Metsä Board Simcote original specification
Simcote is made without MG cylinder by using metal belt calender.
Higher production speed is possible, but combination of CD stiffness and
roughness is not as good as with smaller machines and MG cylinder.
36