fb external report for w8, 2017 - nordic regional · 20-02-2017 21-02-2017 22-02-2017 23-02-2017...
TRANSCRIPT
FB external report for w8, 2017
Contents of the reportSubject Page
Comments 1Market analysis 2
Socio-economical welfare 3-5
Congestion rent 6
Non-intuitive flow 7
Net positions 8-9
Prices 10-13
System Price 14
Power system impact analysis 15-16
Cross-border flows and capacities 17-25
CommentsHighlights
Known errors
Missing hours
In some of the hours during the 23rd and 25th of Febuary the NTC domain was unsafe in regards to N-1 security. As Flow Based does not allow over loads the FB domain is smaller durring these hours than NTC. This means that in some hours there is a negative welfare from switcing from NTC to FB, however the CTNC domain would have been equally restricted as the FB domain.
Some hours are missing in the weekly simulations. This can be due to different issues: -The input data for this hour was not available. -They were differences in the available input data for NTC and FB, which made the comparison between the two impossible.
1
Market analysis
Nordic
Denmark
Norway
Finland
Sweden
The SEW increases for the Nordics this week, where the majority of
the SEW is created in Denmark. The external areas also experience
an increase in SEW.
It is especially in the early morning and durring the night on the
20th, 24th and 26th that the increased SEW is created in Denmark.
This is a typical high wind scenario, where FB allocates flows
differently such that a lot more export from Denmark is possible.
This creates higher prices in the danish areas and increases
producer surplus.
Norway expericenes marginal decreases in SEW this week. The loss
in SEW is mainly due to price convergence which means that
congestion income is lower in FB compared to NTC.
Finland expericenes an increase in SEW more or less the same days
that Denmark experiences increaes. For Finland the higher
distribution of Danish wind decreases prices and increases
consumer surplus.
In Sweden there is a marginal loss of SEW. The prices decrease in SE
due to higher wind exports from Denmark. This increases consumer
surplus, and decreases producer surlplus. Due to the price
convergence congestion income is also reduced in FB compared to
NTC. All in all this gives a slight loss in SEW for Sweden.
Summary of market analysis
2
Socio-economical welfareThe socio-economical welfare, i.e. the sum of consumer surplus, producer surplus and congestion rent, for Flow Based (FB) compared to Net Transfer Capacity (NTC) are shown in the following charts.
The weekly socio-economical welfare per day and in total are shown in the following charts.
-2,0
-1,0
0,0
1,0
2,0
DK NO SE FIN
FB-NTC
M€
Nordic socio-economic per country
Congestion rent Producer surplus
Consumer surplus -300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
DK NO SE FIN
FB-NTC
k€
Total Nordic socio-economic welfare per country
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
FB-NTC
M€
External socio-economic welfare per stakeholder
Congestion rent Producer surplus
Consumer surplus0
50
100
150
200
250
FB-NTC
k€
Total External socio-economic welfare
3
The weekly socio-economical welfare per day and in total are shown in the following charts.
The hourly socio-economical welfare for each country are shown in the following charts.
-0,8-0,6-0,4-0,2
00,20,40,60,8
20
-02
-20
17
21
-02
-20
17
22
-02
-20
17
23
-02
-20
17
24
-02
-20
17
25
-02
-20
17
26
-02
-20
17
FB-NTC
M€
Nordic socio-economic welfare per stakeholder and day
Congestion rent Producer surplus Consumer surplus
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
FB-NTC
M€
…and in total
-200
20406080
100120140
20
-02
-20
17
21
-02
-20
17
22
-02
-20
17
23
-02
-20
17
24
-02
-20
17
25
-02
-20
17
26
-02
-20
17
FB-NTC
k€
Total Nordic socio-economic welfare per day
0
50
100
150
200
250
FB-NTC
k€
...and in total
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
20
-02
-2
01
7
21
-02
-2
01
7
22
-02
-2
01
7
23
-02
-2
01
7
24
-02
-2
01
7
25
-02
-2
01
7
26
-02
-2
01
7
FB-NTC
M€
External socio-economic welfare per stakeholder and day
Congestion rent Producer surplus Consumer surplus
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
FB-NTC
M€
...and in total
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
20
-02
-20
17
21
-02
-20
17
22
-02
-20
17
23
-02
-20
17
24
-02
-20
17
25
-02
-20
17
26
-02
-20
17
FB-NTC
k€
Total External socio-economic welfare per day
0
50
100
150
200
FB-NTC
k€
…and in total
4
Congestion rent
The hourly socio-economical welfare for each country are shown in the following charts.
The total congestion rent, i.e. the product of flow volume and price difference, per border is shown in
-10
-5
0
5
10
-100
-50
0
50
100
0 5 101520 1 6 111621 2 7 121722 3 8 131823 4 9 1419 0 5 101520 1 6 111621
20-02-2017 21-02-2017 22-02-2017 23-02-2017 24-02-2017 25-02-2017 26-02-2017
FB-NTC
Sum
k€
SEW
per
sta
keh
old
er k
€ Denmark, socio-economic welfare per stakeholder and hour
Congestion rent Producer surplus Consumer surplus Sum
-4
-2
0
2
4
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
0 5 101520 1 6 111621 2 7 121722 3 8 131823 4 9 1419 0 5 101520 1 6 111621
20-02-2017 21-02-2017 22-02-2017 23-02-2017 24-02-2017 25-02-2017 26-02-2017
FB-NTC
Sum
k€
SEW
per
sta
keh
old
er k
€ Finland, socio-economic welfare per stakeholder and hour
Congestion rent Producer surplus Consumer surplus Sum
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-80
-30
20
70
0 5 101520 1 6 111621 2 7 121722 3 8 131823 4 9 1419 0 5 101520 1 6 111621
20-02-2017 21-02-2017 22-02-2017 23-02-2017 24-02-2017 25-02-2017 26-02-2017
FB-NTC
Sum
k€
SEW
per
sta
keh
old
er k
€ Norway, socio-economic welfare per stakeholder and hour
Congestion rent Producer surplus Consumer surplus Sum
-10
-5
0
5
10
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
0 5 101520 1 6 111621 2 7 121722 3 8 131823 4 9 1419 0 5 101520 1 6 111621
20-02-2017 21-02-2017 22-02-2017 23-02-2017 24-02-2017 25-02-2017 26-02-2017
FB-NTC
Sum
k€
SEW
per
sta
keh
old
er k
€ Sweden, socio-economic welfare per stakeholder and hour
Congestion rent Producer surplus Consumer surplus Sum
5
Non-intuitive flow
The total congestion rent, i.e. the product of flow volume and price difference, per border is shown in the following chart. Some borders are experience negative congestion rent with Flow Based due to non-intuitive netflows from a higher priced bidding area to a lower priced bidding area. A decrease in congestion rent is due to less border flow and/or smaller price area difference.
-0,5 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5
BE > FRBE > NL
DE > DK1DE > DK2
DE > FRDE > NL
DE > SE4DK1 > DK1A
DK1 > DK2DK1 > NO2DK1 > SE3
DK1A > NO2DK1A > SE3
DK2 > SE4EE > ERIEE > FINEE > LV
FIN > FREFIN > NO4FIN > SE1FIN > SE3FR > GB1
GB1 > GB2GB2 > NLLBE > LTLBI > LT
LRE > LVLRI > LVLT > LV
LT > PLALT > SE4
NL > NO2NO1 > NO1A
NO1 > NO2NO1 > NO3NO1 > NO5NO1 > SE3
NO1A > NO2NO1A > NO5
NO2 > NO5NO3 > NO4NO3 > NO5NO3 > SE2NO4 > SE1NO4 > SE2
PL > PLAPLA > SE4SE1 > SE2SE2 > SE3SE3 > SE4
NO1 > NO2_Skagerrak
M€
FB NTC
The number of hours with "non-intuitive flow", i.e. hours with flow from a high priced area to a low
6
Nordic net position The Nordic and External countries daily average net position, i.e. the netted sum of electricity export and import for each market time period ,is shown in the following charts along with the change of buy
The number of hours with "non-intuitive flow", i.e. hours with flow from a high priced area to a low priced area, and the sum of the resulting negative congestion rent is shown in the following diagram.
0 2 2
20
8
32
8
46
7
37
0
21
37
28
2
41
27
10
36
47
25 25
0
35
23 19
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
DE
> D
K1
DE
> D
K2
DE
> SE
4
DK
1 >
DK
2
DK
1 >
NO
2
DK
1 >
SE3
DK
2 >
SE4
FIN
> N
O4
FIN
> S
E1
FIN
> S
E3
LT >
SE4
NL
> N
O2
NO
1 >
NO
2
NO
1 >
NO
3
NO
1 >
NO
5
NO
1 >
SE3
NO
2 >
NO
5
NO
3 >
NO
4
NO
3 >
NO
5
NO
3 >
SE2
NO
4 >
SE1
NO
4 >
SE2
PL
> SE
4
SE1
> S
E2
SE2
> S
E3
SE3
> S
E4
k€/w
ee
k
h/w
ee
k
Hours with non-intuitive flow and sum of negative congestion rent per border
Number of hours with non-intuitive flows Sum negative congestion rent
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 4 8 121620 0 4 8 121620 0 4 8 121620 0 4 8 121620 0 4 8 121620 0 4 8 121620 0 4 8 121620
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
Number of Nordic borders with non-intuitive flow per hour
7
-4000-2000
0200040006000
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
MW
h/h
Nordic net position per hour
FB NTC
0
20
40
60
Nordics
GW
h
…and in total
FB NTC
-6000-4000-2000
020004000
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
MW
h/h
External net position per hour
FB NTC
-60
-40
-20
0
External
GW
h
...and in total
FB NTC
The Nordic and External countries daily average net position, i.e. the netted sum of electricity export and import for each market time period ,is shown in the following charts along with the change of buy and sell volymes.
The hourly average net position per Nordic country is shown in the following charts .
-40
-20
0
20
DK NO SE FIN
GW
h
Nordic buy and sell volume per country
Buy volume FB-NTC Sell volume FB-NTC
-10.000
-5.000
0
5.000
10.000
15.000
GW
h
Buy volume of FB compared to CNTC, External
Buy volume FB-NTC Sell volume FB-NTC
8
Unique prices and price difference
-2000
0
2000
4000
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
MW
h/h
Denmark, net position per hour
FB NTC
0200040006000
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
MW
h/h
Sweden, net position per hour
FB NTC
-6000
-4000
-2000
0
2000
4000
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
MW
h/h
Norway, net position per hour
FB NTC
-4000
-3000
-2000
-1000
0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
MW
h/h
Finland, net position per hour
FB NTC
80
90
100
110
Denmark
GW
h
…and in total
FB NTC
245
250
255
260
Sweden
GW
h
…and in total
FB NTC
-150
-100
-50
0
Norway
GW
h
…and in total
FB NTC
-187-186-185-184-183-182
Finland
GW
h
…and in total
FB NTC
The average number of Nordic bidding areas with unique hourly prices, and the price area difference is shown in the following charts. The number of uniquely priced bidding areas is increasing with FB but
9
Area Price
0
5
10
15
0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
Number of Nordic bidding areas with unique price
FB NTC
010203040
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
Nordic hourly prices
FB NTC
0
50
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB NTC
The average number of Nordic bidding areas with unique hourly prices, and the price area difference is shown in the following charts. The number of uniquely priced bidding areas is increasing with FB but the average price differences between the bidding areas are lower in FB compared to NTC. In the shatter diagram below the price with FB and the price with NTC for each hour are plotted. The straight line represent the outcome if FB-price would be equal NTC-price. The plotted prices show more frequent above the straight line which indicates a decreased electricity price with Flow Base.
The hourly area price for FB and NTC for each Nordic bidding area are shown in the following charts.
0
10
…and in average
FB NTC
17
22
27
32
37
17 22 27 32 37
NTC
, €/M
Wh
FB, €/MWh
Lower price difference with FB
Lower price difference with NTC
10
The hourly area price for FB and NTC for each Nordic bidding area are shown in the following charts.
-20,0
0,0
20,0
40,0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
DK2, hourly prices
FB DK2 NTC DK2
0,020,040,060,0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
FIN, hourly prices
FB FIN NTC FIN
26,028,030,032,034,0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
NO1, hourly prices
FB NO1 NTC NO1
0
10
20
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB DK2 NTC DK2
0
20
40
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB FIN NTC FIN
0
20
40
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB NO1 NTC NO1
-20,0
0,0
20,0
40,0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
DK1 hourly prices
FB DK1 NTC DK1
0
10
20
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB DK1 NTC DK1
11
26,028,030,032,034,0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
NO2, hourly prices
FB NO2 NTC NO2
0,010,020,030,040,0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
NO3, hourly prices
FB NO3 NTC NO3
0,010,020,030,040,0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
NO4, hourly prices
FB NO4 NTC NO4
26,028,030,032,034,0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
NO5, hourly prices
FB NO5 NTC NO5
0
20
40
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB NO2 NTC NO2
0
10
20
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB NO3 NTC NO3
0
10
20
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB NO4 NTC NO4
0
20
40
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB NO5 NTC NO5
12
System priceThe Nordic system price is calculated without network constraints within the Nordic area, i.e. copper plate. In the parallel simulations of FB and NTC the Nordic system price is not calculated. The different
0,010,020,030,040,0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
SE1, hourly prices
FB SE1 NTC SE1
0,010,020,030,040,0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
SE2, hourly prices
FB SE2 NTC SE2
0
10
20
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB SE1 NTC SE1
0
10
20
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB SE2 NTC SE2
0,010,020,030,040,0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
SE3, hourly prices
FB SE3 NTC SE3
0
10
20
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB SE3 NTC SE3
-10,00,0
10,020,030,040,0
0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218 0 6 1218
2017-02-20
2017-02-21
2017-02-22
2017-02-23
2017-02-24
2017-02-25
2017-02-26
€/M
Wh
SE4, hourly prices
FB SE4 NTC SE4
0,00
10,00
20,00
€/M
Wh
…and in average
FB SE4 NTC SE4
13
Power system impact analysis
The Nordic system price is calculated without network constraints within the Nordic area, i.e. copper plate. In the parallel simulations of FB and NTC the Nordic system price is not calculated. The different modelling approach can though have an impact of system price due to different allocation of capacity to the interconnectors between the Nordics countries and the rest of Europe. The system price is calculated locally at Nord Pool after PCR, area price calculation. Calculated flows between the Nordics and the Netherlands/Germany are taken into account as either price independent import or as price independent export for NO2, DK1, DK2 and SE4. System price calculation has a different area configuration compared to areas price calculation. Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland constitute one bidding are. Baltic countries and Poland are configured as one area each, just as when calculating area prices. Between the Nordic region and the Baltic region + Poland the same capacities as in the PCR, area price calculation, are used when calculating the system price.
0 500 1000 1500 2000
DK1 -> DE
DK1 <- DE
DK2 -> SE4
DK2 <- SE4
FI -> EE
FI <- EE
NO2 -> NL
NO2 <- NL
SE4 -> DE
DE -> SE4
SE4 -> LT
LT -> SE4
PL - > SE4
SE4 -> PL
Capacity [MW]
Average capacities in and out from the Nordics per interconnector
Capacity FB
Capacity NTC
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
NTC FB NTC FB
Capacityfrom theNordics
Capacityto the
Nordics
Cap
acit
y [M
W]
…and in total
14
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
20-02-2017 23-02-2017 24-02-2017 25-02-2017 26-02-2017
Ove
rlo
ads
[MW
h/h
] Sum of CNE overloads systemwide per day
NTC - Market relevant NTC - Not market relevant
FB - Market relevant FB - Not market relevant
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
20-02-2017 23-02-2017 24-02-2017 25-02-2017 26-02-2017
Max
ove
rlo
ad [
MW
h/h
]
Max CNE overloads systemwide per day
NTC - Market relevant NTC - Not market relevant
FB - Market relevant FB - Not market relevant
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 5 10 15 20 1 6 11 16 21 2 7 12 17 22 3 8 13 18 23 4 9 14 19 0 5 10 15 20 1 6 11 16 21
20-02-2017 21-02-2017 22-02-2017 23-02-2017 24-02-2017 25-02-2017 26-02-2017
Ove
rlo
ads
[MW
h/h
]
Sum of CNE overloads systemwide per hour
Sum of NTC overloads Sum of FB overloads
The figure below shows the net increase in welfare against the net reduction in overloads when using FB instead of NTC. Each dot represents one hour of the week addressed in this report. Values
15
Average welfare gain: 1816 k€ Average reduction in overloads: 82 MWh/h
Median welfare gain: -40 k€ Median reduction in overloads: 76 MWh/h
Border flows and Cross-border capacities
-15000
-10000
-5000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500
Increase in welfare and reduction in overloads
Hourly results Average Median
Net reduction in overloads (NTC overloads - FB overloads) [MWh/h]
Net
incr
ease
in w
elfa
re (
FB w
elfa
re -
NTC
w
elfa
re)
[k€
]
The figure below shows the net increase in welfare against the net reduction in overloads when using FB instead of NTC. Each dot represents one hour of the week addressed in this report. Values in the quadrant A correspond to higher welfare and larger overloads with FB. Values in quadrant B correspond to higher welfare and smaller overloads with FB. Values in the quadrant C correspond to lower welfare and smaller overloads with FB. Values in the quadrant D correspond to lower welfare and larger overloads with FB.
A B
C D
The charts in the following pages show the capacities and flows on the borders between bidding areas. The green areas show the maximum and minimum capacities calculated with the flow-based method and blue areas with the NTC method. The green line shows the border flow calculated with the flow-based method and the blue line with the NTC method. For example, the green areas above the blue areas show hours when the flow-based method would enable more cross-border capacity compared to the NTC method.
16
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
1500
1000
500
0
500
1000
1500Fl
ow (M
Wh/
h)DK1-DK1_GE
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
600
400
200
0
200
400
600
800
Flow
(MW
h/h)
DK1-DK1_KontiSkan
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
1500
1000
500
0
500
1000
1500
Flow
(MW
h/h)
DK1-DK1_Skagerrak
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
600
400
200
0
200
400
600
Flow
(MW
h/h)
DK1-DK1_Storebælt
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
600
400
200
0
200
400
600
Flow
(MW
h/h)
DK2-DK2_Kontek
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
600
400
200
0
200
400
600
Flow
(MW
h/h)
DK2-DK2_Storebælt
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
1500
1000
500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
DK2-SE4
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
1000
500
0
500
1000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
FIN-FIN_Estlink
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
1000
500
0
500
1000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
FIN-FIN_FennoSkan
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
150
100
50
0
50
100
150
Flow
(MW
h/h)
FIN-FRE
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
200
100
0
100
200
300
Flow
(MW
h/h)
FIN-NO4
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
1500
1000
500
0
500
1000
1500
Flow
(MW
h/h)
FIN-SE1
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1000
2000
3000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
NO1-NO2
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Flow
(MW
h/h)
NO1-NO2_Skagerrak
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
1000
500
0
500
1000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
NO1-NO3
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1000
2000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
NO1-NO5
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
3000
2000
1000
0
1000
2000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
NO1-SE3
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
800
600
400
200
0
200
400
600
800
Flow
(MW
h/h)
NO2-NO2_NorNed
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
1500
1000
500
0
500
1000
1500
Flow
(MW
h/h)
NO2-NO2_Skagerrak
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
2000
1000
0
1000
2000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
NO2-NO5
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
1500
1000
500
0
500
1000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
NO3-NO4
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
3000
2000
1000
0
1000
2000
3000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
NO3-NO5
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
1500
1000
500
0
500
1000
1500
Flow
(MW
h/h)
NO3-SE2
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
1000
500
0
500
1000
1500
Flow
(MW
h/h)
NO4-SE1
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
400
200
0
200
400
600Fl
ow (M
Wh/
h)NO4-SE2
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
SE1-SE2
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
7500
5000
2500
0
2500
5000
7500
10000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
SE2-SE3
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
1000
500
0
500
1000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
SE3-SE3_FennoSkan
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
800
600
400
200
0
200
400
600
800Fl
ow (M
Wh/
h)SE3-SE3_KontiSkan
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
2000
1000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Flow
(MW
h/h)
SE3-SE4
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
600
400
200
0
200
400
600
Flow
(MW
h/h)
SE4-SE4_Baltic Cable
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
600
400
200
0
200
400
600
800
Flow
(MW
h/h)
SE4-SE4_NordBalt
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation
2017-02-20 2017-02-21 2017-02-22 2017-02-23 2017-02-24 2017-02-25 2017-02-26
600
400
200
0
200
400
600
Flow
(MW
h/h)
SE4-SE4_SwePol Link
Max/min FBMax/min NTCMissing PW dataFB simulationNTC simulation