fault isolation device - seminar · voltage breakdown test under vacuum • chamber maintained...
TRANSCRIPT
Fault Isolation Device - Seminar
1
Dr. Michael "Mischa" SteurerFREEDM FID and HILTB Thrust Leader
Technical Chair ESTS 2017Technical Committee Member ICDCM 2017
Associate Editor for the IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics - JESTPE
Leader Power Systems Research Group Florida State University - Center for Advanced Power Systems - CAPS
2000 Levy Ave, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA
2
1 1T Va
Vb
Vc
TfRL
RL
A
B
C
RL
1.4
6 [o
hm
]
TimedFaultLogic
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C15.0 [kV]
#2#1
115[kV]
30.0 [MVA]
1.4
6 [o
hm
]
Ic_L
Ia_L
Ib_L
4
BB1
BB2
A
B
C
A
B
C0.4 [kV]
#2#1
15 [kV]
750 [kVA]
1.4
6 [o
hm
]
I_line
I_line_2
I_line_3
I_line_1
Vb1
Vc1
1.4
6 [o
hm
]
1.4
6 [o
hm
]
Ic_L1
Ia_L1
Ib_L1
A
B
C
A
B
C0.4 [kV]
#2#1
15 [kV]
750 [kVA]
1.4
6 [o
hm
]
Va1
1 1T
I_line_21
I_line_31
I_line_11
3-Phase Fault
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-2
-1
0
1
2
Time, (sec)
VL, (
pu)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-2
-1
0
1
2
Time, (sec)
VL, (
pu)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-1
0
1
2
3
Time, (sec)
I gri
d,
(pu)
In conventional distribution systems, a fault does not cause a significant voltage drop in the entire system
Fault Currents in Conventional Systems
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35
-1
0
1
Time, (sec)
VL, (
pu
)
1 1T Va
Vb
Vc
TfRL
RL
A
B
C
RL
1.4
6 [o
hm
]
TimedFaultLogic
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C15.0 [kV]
#2#1
115[kV]
30.0 [MVA]
1.4
6 [o
hm
]
Ic_L
Ia_L
Ib_L
4
BB1
BB2
A
B
C
A
B
C0.4 [kV]
#2#1
15 [kV]
750 [kVA]
1.4
6 [o
hm
]
I_line
I_line_2
I_line_3
I_line_1
Vb1
Vc1
1.4
6 [o
hm
]
1.4
6 [o
hm
]
Ic_L1
Ia_L1
Ib_L1
A
B
C
A
B
C0.4 [kV]
#2#1
15 [kV]
750 [kVA]
1.4
6 [o
hm
]
Va1
1 1T
I_line_21
I_line_31
I_line_11
SST
SST
SST
3-Phase Fault
The Fault Isolation Device (FID) has to provide ultra fast isolation of the fault to quickly restore system voltage for continuous operation
FID
FID
Fault Currents in FREEDM Systems
SST DESD activation
Fault
SST DESD activation
In FREEDM systems, the Distributed Energy Storage Device (DESD) of SST provide the power so the customers will not lose the power in case of fault
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-2
-1
0
1
2
Time, (sec)
VL,
(pu
)
The inherent fault current limitation causes a significant voltage drop in the entire system
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-2
-1
0
1
2
Time, (sec)
VL, (
pu)
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35
-1
0
1
Time, (sec)
VL, (
pu
)
Fault
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
-2
-1
0
1
2
Time, (sec)
Vgri
d;I
gri
d, (p
u)
IgridVgrid
FID Thrust Objectives
• Develop and
demonstrate FID
technology evolution
– Gen-1…Gen-3
• Target: 15 kV class
single-phase switch
– Carry 150Arms (3.2 MVA
@12.5kV, 3-phase)
– Interrupt 200Arms
– Open/close within
<1ms
– >99.99% efficient (total
3 phase losses 300 W)4
5
Gen-1 Solid-State FID
DGI
FID
RSC RSC
PSD (material and device)
Voltage Current
Control
Control
AC
Source
IGBT Module 6.5 kV
Gate Gate Gate
Load
IGBT Module 6.5 kV
5SNA 0400J650100 (IGBT)
TI F28335 DSPIGBTs
KEVAI / V
Sensor
TemperatureSensor(s)
Digital I/O
RSC
||
Fiber OpticARM TS-7800
Buffer Circuit
Power Stage
Onboard Computing Platform
Analog
Gen-I FID Controller and Communication
Analog
IFM Process “Pilot Protection”
IEM Process &Other Services FID
7
Testing Fault Isolation Device (FID)
4.16 kV utility bus
4.16 kV experimental bus
AC voltage
reference
from RTDS
AC current
feedback to
RTDS
„ “
Solid state switch3 x 6.5 kV IGBT modules
Real Time Simulator RTDS
Vsource=2.8 kV peak, Iinterrupted=50 A
Using active di/dt control with IGBTs to reduce magnitude of TRV
0.145 0.15 0.155 0.16 0.165 0.17-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Voltage across FID
Interrupted current
Vo
ltag
e [
kV
]
0.14 0.145-10.5
0.16 0.170.15 0.155 0.165
-9.0
-7.5
-6.0
-4.5
-3.0
-1.5
0.0
1.5
3.0
4.5
Cu
rren
t [k
A]
-0.2
-0.175
-0.15
-0.125
-0.1
-0.05
-0.025
0.0
0.025
0.05
0.1
Interrupted current
Voltage across FID
Predicted very well by simulation
model
5 MW Converter “Amplifier”
HV Testing – MOV @ 7.2 kV
MOVs at the required 7.2kVrms Steady State Voltage
Notes:No current flowed at this voltage level
Conclusions:The FID was properly operational at required steady state voltage
HV Testing – MOV @ 10 kV
MOVs at 10kVrms Steady State Voltage
Conclusions:Current conduction began at 10kVrms
Power is still lower than the max dissipation spec of 2.5W
10kVrms is the Max Operational Steady State Voltage of the FID
HV Testing – – MOV @ 11 kV
MOVs at 11kVrms Steady State Voltage
Conclusions:Power is has risen above the max dissipation spec of the MOVs (2.5W)
MOVs began heating up
FID cannot be operated at Steady State voltages higher than 10kVrms
3 (and ½) Generations of FIDs
110 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Load Current, (A)
Vo
ltag
e d
rop
, (V
)
534 Watt
736 Watt
317 Watt
134 Watt225 Watt
31 Watt
20 V, 4000 W
200 A
Fully utilized Gen-I Si IGBT baseline
6 x 3.3 V @ 200 A
4 Devices
in parallel
9.2 V
@ 50 A
Reducing on-state
voltage drop eases
commutation for hybrid
switch application
9.2 V , 1800 WOne Gen-II
SiC ETO
One Gen-III SiC
symmetric GTO
4.4 V
@ 50 A
4.4 V , 900 W
0.5 V , 10 WMechanical /Electrical hybrid 0.5 V - 100 W
One Gen-IIa SiC
symmetric GTO
Gen - III
Gate Gate Gate
Gen 3 FID
12
15 kV, 200 A,
SiC p-ETO, bi-
directional
2
200 (400) A, MOSFET
Rds(on) < 1mOhm
Vbr = 100
200A, 15 kV
mechanical
disconnect switch
Open in < 1ms
0.1 V, 20 W
0.1 V, 20 W
Main breaker (MB)
p-ETO p-ETO
DiodeDiode
Fast mechanical
switch (FMS)Auxiliary breaker
(AB)
MOV
Main breaker (MB)
p-ETO p-ETO
DiodeDiode
Fast mechanical
switch (FMS)Auxiliary breaker
(AB)
MOV
Main breaker (MB)
p-ETO p-ETO
DiodeDiode
Fast mechanical
switch (FMS)Auxiliary breaker
(AB)
MOV
Main breaker (MB)
p-ETO p-ETO
DiodeDiode
Fast mechanical
switch (FMS)Auxiliary breaker
(AB)
MOV
Testing the ETO
D
ETOdcV
25mH
SiC PiN
Diode
dcC
pCL
sC
sR200Ω
30nF
sDCH4
Vak
CH1
Ig
CH3
IsnbM2
Iak
~3 us
Voltage
Current
Testing the MOSFET
14
Low loss:100 mV voltage drop at 280 A.
Low temperature rise:33 °C at 200 A rms.
Compact design:5”X 5”X2”, no fan required.
Demonstrating Operating Sequence
15
Voltage across FID
Total FID current
ETO/diode current
FMS current
MOS OFF ETO OFF
1.5 ms opening time
75 V
R1:15 Ω
+ Channel 1 -
Source
Ch2
Ch3
Ch4Main breaker
(MB)
Fast
mechanical
switch (FMS)Auxiliary breaker
(AB)
MOV
p-ETO
Diode
Alternate
FMS
C-bank &
Thyristor
AB &
MB
5 A
Piezoelectric Actuated Fast Mechanical Disconnect Switch (FMS)
16
• 15 kVRMS, 200 A
• Opening in < 1 ms
• Losses in on-state: < 5 W
US Patent Application No. 15/214,015, filed 7/19/2016
Max Current Simulation
17
• Constrained maximum current simulation: (20K temperature increase)• Steady state: 300 A max• 1 minute transient: 730 A max• 1 second transient: 3050 A max
Project Y8.ET4.1 – FMSHeat run in low vacuum with constant 150 A
• for the 200A test
– Temperature not stabilized
– Still hotspot reaching 90 C
– All other sensors at 70 C
18
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 45020
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Tem
pera
ture
(C
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 4500
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
Voltage D
rop (
V)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Pie
zo v
oltage (
V)
Time (min)
Control of Piezo in reverse polarity
FMS Static Testing
Mechanical Compression Test
• Frame statically compressed to
total deflection of 1.2 mm
(expected 1.0 mm)
• Total Force ≈ 110 N• Comparison with COMSOL model
19
Contact Separation Test
• Measurement of physical distance
between contactors
• 150 V applied to piezo
• Total contact separation
4 x 0.4mm
Dynamic Response in Air and DSP Controller Validation
0.25 mm Contact
Separation
11
0.32 mm Contact
Separation
Ramp Speed: 600us
FMS Voltage Breakdown test under vacuum
• Chamber maintained
proper vacuum for 100 hrs,
without getter pump
• Voltage breakdown tested
with 4 x 0.5 mm contact
spacing
– ~22 kV max
– ~15 kV steady state
21
Voltage Withstand Test (1 atm) with Piezo Actuator
• AC Voltage Pulse applied across terminals of FID– RTDS -> Techron Amp -> 1:100 Xfmr -> FID terminals
– 10 Mohm resistor connected to Xfmr secondary terminals
– Xfmr Primary Voltage and Current Measured
– Voltage and Current measured at FID terminals
– Pulse = • 60 Hz, 10 cycles, starting at peak of AC waveform, 10 V/s down ramp, peak
magnitude is varied
Piezo Amplifier
XfmrAmplifier
Xfmr1:100
FID
• Piezo controlled with RTDS
amplified DC signal
– RTDS -> Techron Amp + 15 ohm
resistor -> Piezo
– Voltage measured across Piezo
– Contact separation – 4 x 0.35 mm
Voltage Breakdown Test Results
1.68 kVrms
3.33 kVrms
4.18 kVrms
4.83 kVrms
t [s]
In air, 1 bar
• Repeat in vacuum
• Measure at different gap
distances
• Confirm DC capability (using
voltage grading resistors)
Future Pathways for FID Technology
• Fault current limiter
– For legacy systems with high fault current levels
– Requires higher speed of FMS
• DC applications
– Growing trend towards MVDC
– Requires resistive voltage balancing between contacts in FMS
• Breaker free system architectures
– Fully utilize the fault current breaking capability of the SSTs
– Use FMS alone to isolate fault after complete system de-energization
24
Detect and
localize fault
Re-energize
systemDe-energize
system
Isolate
faulted
segment
M. Sloderbeck, D. Soto, H. Ravindra, M. Steurer, A. Challita, “Megawatt Scale
Demonstration of High Speed Fault Clearing and Power Restoration for MVDC Systems
Utilizing Fast Disconnect Switch”, in Proc. AMTS, Philadelphia, May 25-26, 2016
IEEE Std. C37.302™-2015, “IEEE Guide for Fault Current Limiter
(FCL) Testing of FCLs Rated above 1000 V AC”
Pilot Directional Protection
George G Karady
Qiushi Wang & Zhenmin Tang
Presently used radial distribution system
• The distribution system today is a radial network, which is protected by fuses and fast acting reclosing circuit breakers.
• The circuit breaker is activated by overcurrent protection
• The most fault is produced by lightning which causes a flashover of an insulator. This generates a short circuit
• The fast acting circuit breaker interrupts the current and recloses circuit with about 15-second delay.
• This means that the customer has only a very short outage, which dips the lights and slows down air-conditioners.
• In a distribution system with cables most fault is permanent and recloser is not used
Presently used radial
distribution system
Feeder 4Feeder 1
Feeder 2F
eed
er
3
Three-phase Four-wireMain Feeder
Neu
tral
Re-closing Circuit Breaker
Fuse
Single-phase Radial Feeder
Single-phase Radial Feeder
Sub-transmission Line
To Consumer Service Drop
Distribution (Step-down) Transfomer
The three-phase main feeders are
protected by a reclosing circuit breaker
This switches off the feeder in case of a
fault, and after a few cycles, the breaker
recloses and restores the energy supply.
This is an effective way of protection for
overhead distribution circuits because
most faults on an overhead line are
temporary.
The rest of the system is fuse protected
FREEDM System• In 2008, the National Science Foundation chose NC State to lead an effort to
create a modern power grid.
• At the FREEDM Systems Engineering Research Center, universities from the United States have joined forces with industry partners to develop a more secure, sustainable environmentally friendly electric grid.
• At the FREEDM Center, we’re building the internet of energy: a network of distributed energy resources that intelligently manages power using secure communications and advanced power electronics. Our research priorities include power electronics packaging, controls theory, solid state transformers, fault isolation devices, and power systems simulation and demonstration.
• For students, FREEDM offers research opportunities at five universities: NC State, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical, Florida State, Arizona State and the Missouri University of Science and Technology. On all these campuses, the next generation of energy-focused scientists and engineers can help develop the next-generation electric grid
FREEDM System Vision
• To develop an efficient and revolutionary new
distribution power grid
• Utilizing revolutionary power electronics technologyand information technology
• Integrating distributed and scalable alternative energysources and storage with existing power systems
• Automate the management of load, generation and storage
• Major components are: Solid state Transformer (SST) and Electronic circuit breaker (FID)
Slide is copy from: A.Huang: FREEDM System Vision, Grand challenges and Research Roadmap. Webinar 2010
Slide is copy from: A Huang: FREEDM System Vision, Grand challenges and Research Roadmap. Webinar 2010
• The FREED distribution
system is a loop system
• The loads are supplied by
Solid state Transformers
(SST)
• The loop is divided into
sections
• Each section is protected
by two Electronic circuit
breakers (FID)
Slide is copy from: A. Huang: FREEDM System Vision, Grand challenges and Research Roadmap. Webinar 2010
• The FREEDM distribution system is
built with interconnected loops
• The loop system requires the fast
identification and elimination of
the fault by FID’s.
• FID’s switch of only the section
where the fault occurred
• This calls for a selective differential
type protection
• ASU applied the pilot differential
protection
FREEDM Loop Protection Concept
• The FREEDM system is a loop with several sections, each of them is protected by two fast acting FID devices.
• The loop system requires differential or pilot protection to identify the fault location and only switch off the section with the fault.
• In case of overhead type transmission the reclosing can further improve the system reliability.
Pilot Directional Protection• Pilot Directional protection use Schweitzer
Laboratory produced SEL-351S relays witha wireless communication link.
• Each SEL relay is supplied by a currenttransformer and a voltage transformergenerated signals and configured tomeasure the current direction and thecurrent and voltage amplitude.
• The fault is detected by the sudden voltagereduction and increase of current.
• During the normal operation directionalelement of the SEL relay is in block state.But during faults, it produces F (forward) orR (reverse) signal depending up on thedirection of fault current.
D
D
Relay
An
ten
na
Transmitter
AC
DC
Pilot Directional Protection• The picture shows two of the Wireless Directional Protection system.
• Each relay is connected with the measurement device and at the top of therelay is the wireless communication unit supplied by the DC source.
DC power supplySEL Digital relay
Wireless Communication unit
Description of Pilot Directional Protection
Operation
Pilot Directional Protection
Fault
D
D
R1
F
FID1
R5
F
R4
F
FID3
R6 F
FID
4
R2 F
R3 F
FID
2
Section 1
Section 2
Se
ction
3
Ac circuit breaker
I1 I2
• Figure shows that a fault in Section 2 produces two currents I1 and I2
• Relays R1,R2,R3 measure forward current and transmit F signal to the adjacent relays
• As an example R2 sends F signal to R1 and R3 only.
• Relays R4,R5,R6 measure revers current and transmit R signal to the adjacent relays.
• As an example R5 sends R signal to R4 and R6
Pilot Directional Protection
• In Section 1 both relays R1 and R2
measures F signal and also
receive F signal, which prevents
trip signal generation.
• In Section 3 both R5 and R6
measures R signals which also
eliminates FID operation.
• In Section 2 relay R3 measures F and R4 measures R signal, which results
generation of trip signals by both relays.
• The trip signal opens both FID 2 and FID 3, which eliminates the fault, while
the rest of the system remain in operation.
Fault
D
D
R1
F
FID1
R5
F
R4
F
FID3
R6 F
FID
4
R2 F
R3 F
FID
2
Section 1
Section 2
Se
ction
3
Ac circuit breaker
I1 I2
Pilot Directional Protection
Short circuit occurred Trip signal generatedCircuit breaker operated
• Upper part of the figure
shows three phase sort-
circuit current, which
initiate relay operation.
• The relay typical detects
the short circuit within a
half cycle, less than 8 ms.
• The relay generated DC trip
signal activates the FID
which interrupts the short
circuit current.
• This case a low voltage
magnetic relay was used,
which operated within 2.5
cycles
Demonstration of relay operation and short circuit
current interruption
Verification of Pilot Directional Protection
Operation
Verification of Pilot Directional Protection Operation
FSU-CAPS HIL Testbed
Diagram for ASU Protection
Hardware Testing
Pilot directional protection
The Pilot Directional Protection system was successfully tested in
Florida State University RTD system.
Verification of Pilot Directional Protection Operation
• In this test, the FREEDM loop system is simulated by real-time digital power simulator (RTDS), in the Center for Advanced Power Systems (CAPS) at Florida State University.
• ASU provided two SEL-351S directional protection systems are interfaced with RTDS to physically detect the fault location and send trip signal to FID’s.
• The input of the relays are small ac voltage signals representing secondary currents and voltages at different monitoring locations of the loop system from RTDS
• The output of the relay is connected to a function block called Fault Isolation Device (FID) in RTDS
• Once FID receives trip signal from SEL-351S relay, it will cut off the fault current within the protection zone in RTDS.
• SEL-351 relay builds wireless communication with other relays via SEL-3031 radios system; SEL-3031 radio provides 9MHz mirrored bits wireless connection.
Verification of Pilot Directional Protection Operation
Fault direction Fault direction Fault direction
Relay at FID 3 Forward Forward Reverse
Relay at FID 5 Forward Reverse Forward
Trip signal No trip Trip generated No trip
Trip logic for FID 3 and FID 5
Verification of Pilot Directional Protection Operation
Relay Event Report for FID 3, when the fault occurs between FID3 and FID 5
Back-up Pilot Directional Protection
Back-up protection
• The figure shows the FREEDM loop
with a fault in section FID4-FID5
• All relay measures the current
directions.
• Relays 1,2,3and 4 measures
current forward direction 1
• Relays 5,6 and 7 measures current
reverse direction 2
• The relays can communicate the
measured direction (1 or 2)
wirelessly to each others less than
few milliseconds.
Back-up Pilot Directional Protection
• The relays send trip signal to the FID if in a section one relay measures current direction 1 and the other 2
• This give us the idea that we can use the system for provide back up protection
• Example: trip signal generated in case of fault in the section terminated by FID4 and FID 5 when Relay 4 measures direction 1 and Relay 5 direction 2 or vice-versa
• Simultaneously Relay 3 also measures direction 2 and Relay 6 measures direction 1.
• These signals are sent to each other results trip signals for FID 3 and FID 6
• The sufficient delay of these trip signals provide back up protection when FID 4 and 5 is not tripped.
• ASU programed the relays to perform the described process.
• The logic diagram for the back up protection is in the next slide
Back-up Pilot Directional Protection
Fault location Back up protection Time delay
FID 1 & 2 Relay 3 & 7 5ms
FID 2 & 3 Relay 1 & 4 5ms
FID 3 & 4 Relay 2 & 5 5ms
FID 4 & 5 Relay 3 & 6 5ms
FID 5 & 6 Relay 4 & 7 5ms
FID 6 & 7 Relay 6 & 1 5ms
Backup Pilot Directional Protection
This figure demonstrates the operation of the primary and backup protection
• Figure shoes that both
protection sensed the
fault in the same time
(dotted vertical line)
• FID operated around after
2.5 cycle in case of
primary protection
• FID operated after 4.5
cycle in case of Backup
protection
Primary protection
Back-up protection
Integration of Pilot Directional Protection in
the FID Electronic Circuit breaker
Integration of Pilot Directional Protection in the FID
• The presently built protection system use large and expensive digital relays, which can not be integrated into the FID device.
• ASU started the development of a small protection computer that can be incorporated in the FID.
• The work began with the elaboration of an algorithm to measure the current direction.
• The current direction can be measured by calculating the FREEDM loop positive and negative sequence impedances.
• In case of unsymmetrical fault the negative sequence impedance can be used for detection of current direction.
• If the calculated Z2
is smaller than forward threshold impedance, the fault is in forward direction to a relay.
• If the calculated Z2
is greater than reverse threshold impedance, the fault is in reverse direction to a relay.
Integration of Pilot Directional Protection in the FID
• The negative sequence impedance is negligible in case of symmetrical three phase fault and the voltage is also close to zero.
• The developed method compares with the present positive sequence impedance with the corresponding positive sequence components a few cycles before.
• The difference in the positive voltage and positive current is used to determine the direction of fault current in the system.
• The current direction is determined by combining both positive sequence and negative sequence component method.
• In the FREEDM loop, each section is protected by two FID’s. Each of them will be equipped by a small computer which determines the current direction and communicates to the other.
Integration of Pilot Directional Protection in the FID
• The fault is in the loop when the measurement current directions are opposite.
• In this case, both relays will send a trip signal to the corresponding FID and to isolate the fault
• ASU developed a MATLAB program to perform this operation
• The program is installed on two laptop computers equipped with a data acquisition device
• The system was successfully tested using the ASU’s Analog protection unit