family court statistics - ministry of justice · statistical bulletin: family court introduction...

Family Court StatisticsAn overview of Family Court Statistics in New Zealand 2004 to 2008

STATISTICAL BULLETIN May 2010

Overall trends 1999 to 2008

• Thenumberofnewapplications2isstable.Thisindicatesthatcourtworkloadisrelativelyconstantoverthatperiod.

• Theannualnumberofnewcaseshasgenerallydecreased.ThispointstofallingnumbersofnewfamilygroupsusingtheFamilyCourt.Theexceptionsarethoseseekingcounsellingorrelationshipdissolution.

Parenting of children

• Between2005and2008,thedistributionofpartiesgivenday-to-daycarehasmoreorlessremainedthesame.Mostparentingordersgiveday-to-daycaretoeitherthemotherorthefather.

• NewPlymouthandRotoruacourtclustershadthehighestrateofnewparentingofchildrencasesin2008.

Family violence

• Thenumberofprotectionorderapplications,andtheproportionofapplicationsgranted,havebeenstablebetween2006and2008.

• In2008,theSouthIslandhasalowerrateofnewfamilyviolencecasesthantheNorthIsland.

Care and protection of children

• Theannualnumberofnewchildrenneedingcareandprotectionrosefromaboutnearly1900in2004toover2250in2006.Thenumberdeclinedtoabout1550in2008.

• Between2004and2008,85percentofapplicationstocareandprotectachildcitedthelikelihoodofharmorimpairmentofwell-beingasoneofthegroundsfortheaction.

• Themaingroupofchildrentakenintocarearebetween0-4yearsold.Incontrast,thelargestgroupofchildrenattheirfinalreviewareaged15yearsandolder.

Dissolution of relationships

• Thenumberofjointdissolutionofmarriageandcivilunionapplicationsfellsteadilybetween2004and2008.

• In2008,boththeNorthandSouthIslandsappeartohavesimilarratesofdissolutioncases.ThehighestratewasintheNelson-Marlborougharea.

Thisbulletinanalyses,between2004and2008,thefourmainareasthatcomeunderthejurisdictionoftheFamilyCourt.1Italsolooksatoveralltrendsofusefrom1999to2008.

Family Court statistics – main findings

1 Formoreinformation,pleasegotowww.justice.govt.nz/courts/family-court.

2Throughoutthispublication,onlysubstantiveapplicationsareconsidered.

1

www.justice.govt.nzPOBox180,Wellington,NewZealandCORP414•ISBN978-0-478-29087-X

2

STATISTICALBULLETIN:FAMILYCOURT

IntroductionTheFamilyCourtisaspecialistcourtthatdealsmainlywithdisputesandotherlegalmatterswithinfamilysettings.ThisbulletinprovidesstatisticsonfourcasetypeswithwhichtheFamilyCourtdeals.Theseare:

• Parentingofchildrenwheretheparentsand/orguardiansareunabletoagree

• Familyviolence

• Protectionofchildrenandchildoffenders

• Dissolutionofrelationships.

OthermattersalsoheardintheFamilyCourt,butnotcoveredinthisbulletin,includementalhealth,andpropertyrelationshipcases.

Overalltrends1999to2008Thissection3reportsontheoveralltrendsofcasesandapplicationsintheNewZealandFamilyCourtsystembetween1999and2008.Figure1showsthepercentageincreaseordecreaseinsubstantiveapplicationssince1999,with1999setat100percent.Figure2showssimilarpercentagesfornewcasesfrom1999.

• Theoveralltrendfrom1999isthatthenumberofnewapplicationsisalmoststatic.

• Thenumberofnewapplicationsisanindicatoroftheworkloadofthecourt.

• Protectionofchildrenandfamilyviolenceapplicationshavegenerallydeclined.Parentingofchildrenapplicationsappearstatic.

• Protectionorderapplicationshavefallenfrom6520in1999to4422in2008.

Figure 1: Trends in new applications, 1999 to 20084

3 Datacollectionfrom22FamilyCourtsbeganinJuly1998.Allcourtswereincludedintothecollectionin2004.

4 BasedondatafromthoseCourtsthatwereusingtheFamilyCourtDataBase(FCDB)inJuly1998.

2

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

01999 2000 20082007200620052004200320022001

Overall

FamilyviolenceProtectionofchildrenParentingofchildren

Relationshipdissolution,counselling

%o

f199

9ap

plic

atio

ns

3


• Theoveralltrendfrom1999isthatthenumberofnewcasesisgraduallyfalling.

• Eachnewcasetypicallyrepresentsanewfamilygroupforthattypeofcase.ItthereforeappearsthatfewerfamilygroupsareusingtheFamilyCourt.

• Theonlycasetypestoregisteranincreasesince1999arerelationshipdissolutionandseekingcounselling.

Figure 2: Trends in new cases, 1999 to 20085 6

5 BasedondatafromthoseCourtsthatwereusingtheFCDBinJuly1998.

6 DataforProtectionofChildrenisfrom2000,asdatafor1999isincomplete.

ParentingofchildrenThissectionreportsoncasesandapplicationsrelatedtotheparentingofchildrenwheretheirparentsand/orguardiansareunabletoagree.UndertheCareofChildrenAct2004(whichcameintoforceon1July2005),partiesareencouragedtoreachtheirownagreementsabouttheparentingofchildren.Iftheycannotagreeajudgecandecidewhichcaregiverprovidesday-to-daycareandwhattypeofcontactotherpartiesmayhave.

Mainfindingsfor2005to2008

Figure3showsthedistributionofpartiesgivenday-to-daycare,between2005and2008.Notethatthemajorityofordersaregiven‘byconsent’ofthepartiestotheproceedings,ratherthandecidedbyajudge.

• Thedistributionhashardlyvariedinthefouryearsofdata.

• Mostofthetime,day-to-daycareisgiventoasingleparty(eg,motheronly,fatheronly).Relativelyfewordersaresharedbetweentwoormoreparties.

• Thetotalnumberofparentingordershasbeenrising.In2006(thefirstfullyear),therewere4230finalorders,comparedto5812in2008.

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

01999 2000 20082007200620052004200320022001

Overall

FamilyviolenceProtectionofchildrenParentingofchildren

Relationshipdissolution,counselling

%o

f199

9ap

plic

atio

ns

4


Figure4showsthenumberofparentingofchildrencases,calculatedasarateper1000coupleswithchildren(2006populationcensus).TherateishighestintheNewPlymouthandRotoruacourtcluster,andthelowestinNelsonandDunedin.TheSouthIslandclustersappeartohavelowerratesthantheNorthIslandones.

Figure 4. Number of new parenting of children cases (family groups) in 2008 per 1000 couples, by Court Cluster

100

80

60

40

20

02005 2006 20082007

Father Mother

Motherandother Shared-otherparties

Fatherandother MotherandFather

Mother,Fatherandother Other

Figure 3: Day-to-day care parenting orders, 2005 - 20087

%o

fall

day-

to-d

ayc

are

pare

ntin

gor

ders

Note:Theshadinginthemapaboveindicates‘rates’per1,000coupleswithchildren–thenumbersineachoftheregionsonthemappertaintotheactualnumberofnewcasesinitiatedinthatgeographicalregion.

7 Distributionofordersmadewheretherelationshipsbetweentheadultpartiesandthechildrenareallrecorded,datafor2005onlyfrom1July2005whenlegislationtookeffect.

5


FamilyviolenceThissectionreportsoncasesandapplicationsrelatedtofamilyviolence.TheFamilyCourtdealswiththeissuingofprotectionordersandotherlegalmattersundertheDomesticViolenceAct1995.Protectionorderapplicationscanbemadewithoutnoticeoronnotice.8 Notethatpoliceprosecutionsforfamilyviolencecrimestakeplaceinthecriminalcourt.


Overthisperiod,88percentofallprotectionorderapplicationswerefiledwithoutnotice.Ofthose,84percentresultedinatemporaryprotectionorder.

Figure5showsthenumberandfinaloutcomeofprotectionorderapplications.Thetotalnumberofprotectionorderapplicationshasbeenstablebetween2006and2008.Ithadfallensteadilyfrom1999,thefirstyearofelectronicrecording,to2006.

Figure 5: Number of protection order applications and final outcomes, 2004 - 2008

8 Onnoticeapplicationsareservedontherespondentwhohasanopportunitytorespond,beforeajudgeconsidersmakinganorder.Withoutnoticeapplicationsareconsideredbyajudgebeforetherespondenthasanopportunitytorespond(usuallybecausetherearesignificantsafetyconcerns).Ifajudgegrantsawithoutnoticeapplication,atemporaryprotectionorderismadeinthefirstinstanceandtherespondentcanthendefendtheorderbecomingfinal(permanent).Temporaryprotectionordersbecomepermanentautomaticallyafterthreemonthsunlesstheyarechallengedorwithdrawn.

Onceaprotectionorderisgranted,itremainsenforceableindefinitely.Italsousuallyrequirestherespondenttotheprotectionordertoattendastoppingviolenceprogramme.Iftheapplicationwaswithoutnotice,respondentscanobjecttoattendingtheprogramme.Theremovalofaprotectionorderrequiresthegrantingofanapplicationtodischargetheprotectionorder.Theapplicationtodischargecanbemadebyeithertheprotectionorderrespondentorapplicant.

Figure6showsthenumberoftwotypesofapplicationsthataregranted.Thetwotypesofapplicationsaretodischargetheprotectionorder,andobjectingtoprogrammeattendance.

• Thetotalnumberofgrantedapplications(bothtypes)isstablebetween2004and2008.

• Onlyabout30percentofapplicationsobjectingtoattendanceofaprogrammearegranted.

5000

4500

4000

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

02008

Dismissed,struckout

Lapsed,withdrawn,discontinued

Granted,grantedwithconsent

Stillactive,transferred

2005 2006 20072004

Num

ber

ofa

pplic

atio

ns

6


Figure 6: Number of applications granted, 2004 – 2008

Figure7showsthegeographicalratesofnewfamilyviolencecasesin2008.Thenumbersoffamilyviolencecasesarecalculatedasarateper1000couples(2006populationcensus).TherateishighestintheGisborneandRotoruacourtcluster,andthelowestinNelson,DunedinandInvercargill.TheratesfortheSouthIslandclustersarenoticeablylowerthanthosefortheNorthIsland.

Figure 7: Number of new family violence cases (family groups) in 2008 per 1000 couples, by Court Cluster

600

500

400

300

200

100

02008

Objecttoprogrammeattendance Dischargeprotectionorder

2005 2006 20072004

App

licat

ions

gra

nted

Note:Theshadinginthemapaboveindicates‘rates’per1,000couples–thenumbersineachofthe

regionsonthemappertaintotheactualnumberofnewcasesinitiatedinthatgeographicalregion

7


CareandprotectionofchildrenThissectionreportsonthecareandprotectionofchildrenundertheChildren,YoungPersonsandtheirFamiliesAct1989.Section14oftheActprovidesinstancesorgroundswherethestateshouldcareandprotectachild.ThehearingofchildcareandprotectioncasesareheldintheFamilyCourt.

Suchcasesareinitiatedbyanapplicationforadeclarationthatachildisinneedofcareandprotection–referredtosubsequentlyasanapplicationfordeclaration.

Whenadeclarationismade,theMinistryofSocialDevelopmentmustfileaplanproposinghowthechildwillbecaredfor.ThisplanmustbereviewedbytheCourtaslongasthechildiscoveredbytheAct.Forchildrenundersevenyearsofage,areviewistohappenatleastevery6months.Forchildrenoversevenareviewistooccuratleastevery12months.However,aFamilyCourtjudgemayordermorefrequentreviews.


ThegroundsfordeclaringachildinneedofcareandprotectionareenteredintotheMinistryofJustice’sdatabase.Multiplegroundscanbeentered.Figure8showsthepercentageofapplicationswherethesegroundswerecited,categorisedbyagegroup.

• Forchildrenagedbelow10,likelihoodofharmtothechildisthepredominantreasonforprotection.

• Forchildrenagedabove10,otherreasons(eg,harmfulbehaviour)aremorefrequentlycited.

Thepercentagesdonotvarygreatlybetweenyears.Themostnoticeablechangehasbeenthedeclineinthe‘caregiverunabletocareforchild’ground.In2004,itwascitedinnearly40percentofalldeclarations.However,in2008,itwasmentionedinunder30percentofthem.

Figure 8: Grounds for protecting children, 2004 – 2008, by age group

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Likelihoodofharm/impairmentofwell-being

Caregiversunabletocareforchild

Harmful/uncontrollablebehaviour

Seriousdifferencesbetweencaregiversand/orchild

Childoffender

Abandonmentorpsychologicalattachment

5to9 10to14 15andaboveupto4

Agegroup(Years)

%o

fapp

licat

ions

with

the

seg

roun

ds

8


Figure9showsthenumberofchildrenassociatedwithcareandprotectiondeclaration.Thenumbershavedroppedsignificantlyfromthepeakin2006,whilstthegendermixisrelativelyconstant.

Figure 9: Annual number of children declared to be in need of care and protection – by

gender9, 2004 – 2008

100

80

60

40

20

02008

upto4 6to9 10to14 15andabove

2005 2006 20072004

9 Thedataisbasedontheyearinwhichthegrantedapplicationfordeclarationwasfiled.

10 Thedataisbasedontheyearinwhichthegrantedapplicationfordeclarationwasfiled.

11 Thedatafor2008isonlyforthefirstsixmonthsoftheyear.

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

02008

Female Male

2005 2006 20072004

Unknown

Num

ber

ofc

hild

ren

per

year

Theannualdistributionofchildren’sagesatdeclarationisshowninFigure10.Thereisabiastowardsyoungerchildren.Thegroupaged0to4yearsisalwaysthelargestgroup.The10to14yearoldgroupisthesecondlargestgroup.

Figure 10: Annual distribution of children’s ages declared to be in need of care and protection10, 2004 –2008

%o

fchi

ldre

nin

the

age

ran

gea

tde

clar

atio

n

Onceachildisincareandprotection,thecaseisregularlyreviewed–usuallyatintervalsof6or12months.Thereviewprocessinvolvesfilings135planreviewdocumentation.Theprocessisrepeateduntilthechildisdeemedtonolongerrequirecareandprotection.Thedistributionofchildren’sagesatfinalreview11isshowinFigure11.

9


Thedistributionatfinalreviewisquitedifferentfromthedistributionatdeclaration.Thebiggestagegrouparethoseaged15andabove.Thissuggeststhatmanychildrenarecaredandprotectedfromdeclarationuntillegaladulthood.However,about60percentofchildrennolongerneedingcareandprotectionareagedbelow15yearsold.

Figure 11: Distribution of protected children’s ages (at final review), 2004 –2008

100

80

60

40

20

02008

upto4 6to9 10to14 15andabove

2005 2006 20072004

%o

fchi

ldre

nin

the

age

ran

gea

tfin

alr

evie

w

DissolutionofrelationshipsThissectionreportsonapplicationstodissolverelationships.Bothmarriagesandcivilunionsarecoveredbythissection.


Figure12showsthenumberofapplicationsforamarriageorciviluniondissolution(eitherjointdissolutionsorsingledissolutions).

• Thenumberofjointdissolutionapplicationsfellsteadilybetween2004and2008.In2004,therewere7561jointdissolutionscomparedto6457in2008.

• Thenumbersofsingledissolutionapplicationsremainsteady.

Figure 12: Number of dissolutions applications, 2004 - 2008

8000

7000

6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

0

2008

Jointdissolution Singledissolution

2005 2006 20072004

Num

ber

ofa

pplic

atio

ns

10


Figure13showsthegeographicdistributionofnewdissolutioncasesin2008,per1000couples.BoththeNorthandSouthIslandsappeartohavethesamerateofdissolutioncases.However,theareawiththehighestrate(per1000couples)isintheNelson-Marlborougharea.

Figure 13: Joint and single dissolution cases, rate per 1000 couples, by Court Cluster, 2008

Note:Theshadinginthemapaboveindicates‘rates’per1,000couples–thenumbersineachoftheregionsonthemappertaintotheactualnumberofnewcasesinitiatedinthatgeographicalregion.

11


NotesInthisbulletinthedatesusedarewhentheapplicationswerefiled,orwhenthecaseswerecreated.TrendsinFigure1arecompiledbyonlycountingsubstantiveapplications.

ThenumberofchildreninFigure9wasderivedbycountinguniqueidentifiersassociatedwiththeyearthedeclarationwasgranted.

Courtareasareestimatedbyallocatingeach2006censusmesh-blocktothenearestcourthouse.Nearnessismeasuredastheshortestroaddistancefromthegeographicalcentreofthemesh-blocktothecourthouse.Courtareapopulationsareestimatedbysumming2006censusdataonthesizeoftheusuallyresidentpopulationforthemesh-blockswithineachcourtarea.Forpresentationpurposes,offshoremesh-blocksarenotdisplayed.

Becauseofrounding,percentagesshowninthefiguresmaynotaddupto100percent.

Theterms“parentingofchildren”and“familyviolence”areusedhereinpreferenceto“guardianship”and“domesticviolence”adoptedinpreviousMinistryofJusticefamilycourtstatisticalreports.

OtherannualstatisticalreportsavailableTheResearch,EvaluationandModellingUnitwithintheMinistryofJusticepublishesannualstatisticalreports.ThesearelistedbelowandarecurrentlyavailableattheMinistryofJusticewebsite–http://www.justice.govt.nz

• ConvictionandSentencingofOffendersinNewZealand

• FamilyCourtStatisticsinNewZealand

• ChildandYouthOffendingStatisticsinNewZealand(formerlytitledYouthJusticeStatisticsinNewZealand)

family court statistics - ministry of justice · statistical bulletin: family court introduction...

Documents