faculty of midwifery education & studies maastricht maternal distress - what do midwives do and...
TRANSCRIPT
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
MATERNAL DISTRESS - What do midwives do and what motives do they have?
A two-phased exploratory study
Yvonne Fontein RM MSc PgDHE
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
MATERNAL DISTRESS - What do midwives do and what motives do they have? A two-phased exploratory study
Phase I - Qualitative interviews (Sept 2011- Feb 2012)
Phase II – Quantitative sample survey (March –Sept 2012)
*Research ethics committee Atrium-Orbis
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE I. Qualitative interviews
AIM To gain insight in and familiarity with midwives' behaviour and cognitiveprocesses and perceived influences on the utilization of the midwife's care forpregnant women with maternal distress
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE I. Qualitative interviews
Critical organisational-ethno methodological approach
Purposive sampling•Six midwives
Individual semi-structured interviews•Scott-Morgan method•Use of visual-narratives
Analysis: Nvivo8•Theory of Planned Behaviour
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE I. Qualitative interviews
Critical organisational-ethno methodological approach
Purposive sampling•Six midwives
Individual semi-structured interviews•Scott-Morgan method•Use of visual-narratives
Analysis: Nvivo8•Theory of Planned Behaviour
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB)
Attitude
Subjective norm Intention BEHAVIOUR
Self-efficacy
Ajzen (1991) Barriers
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE I. Qualitative interviews
RESULTS: BEHAVIOUR• Diverse practice (Yelland et al 2007)
• Care unstructured, embedded in daily practice• Midwives identify competencies, skills and routines/ habits
and learned patterns; less clear about screening• Performance influenced by perceived level of experience,
interest, views of professional remit, sense of responsibility and competence, ability and willingness to address maternal distress
“…Because of my daughter’s problems [ ], I am much more aware of how women feel and need help and support…”
“… Screening questionnaire? [ ] EPDS? Heard about it. Wouldn’t know how to use it though…”
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE I. Qualitative interviews
RESULTS: ATTITUDE• Maternal distress is a serious problem • Is part of midwife’s scope of practice• Not always sure what to do and how to do it and how it fits
in the continuously expanding tasks of the midwife or their task-orientated attitude
• Autonomy of the woman• Intense
“….I really think I should ask women about it, but please tell me how…”
“…Sometimes I just don’t want to know or hear what [ ] goes on in a woman’s life…”
“…You just know it when something is wrong but I respect it when a woman doesn’t want to tell me…”
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE I. Qualitative interviews
RESULTS: SUBJECTIVE NORM• Women’s perception of pregnancy, maternal
transition and maternal distress
“…Sometimes I sense women do not want to talk about it, because they think they should be happy [ ], that pregnancy should be a happy thing and that there should be no reason to complain…”
“…I think they expect me to ask about it [maternal distress]…”
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE I. Qualitative interviews
RESULTS: SELF-EFFICACY• Confident of personal and professional
capabilities and competence• Less confident about screening and referral
skills• Less confident about knowledge
“…I know I can support women with maternal distress but sometimes I keep my fingers crossed, hoping that I am doing the right thing because I am not always sure, but I really do hope so…”
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE I. Qualitative interviews
RESULTS: INTENTIONIntentions are clear on macro level but less
explicit on meso and micro level
“…I really would like to make a difference in the health and happiness of the new generation…”
“…Making a health & social care map seems like a good idea to do at some point [ ] soon…”
“…Well, I should look for some information or conference or something about maternal distress, shouldn’t I…?”
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE I. Qualitative interviews
RESULTS: BARRIERS• Barriers: Lack of education (Buist et al, Yelland et al 2007, Jones et al 2011, McCauley et
al 2011), guidelines for screening, clinical pathways and knowledge/ insight other health professionals and the organisation of own practice affects care
• Supportive: Relationship with the woman; environment of woman; education; research, health & social care map; inter-disciplinary collaboration and reflection are helpful
“…I don’t ask women about maternal distress because I have no idea who to refer to, so what’s the point…?”
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE I. Qualitative interviews CONCLUSION• A first insight in midwives’ perspectives and subsequent
behaviour patterns was captured, allowing to make sense of the midwife’s everyday practice in regard to maternal distress
IMPLICATIONS• Provides sufficient information to serve as a foundation
for questionnaire development phase II
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE II. Sample survey
Aim To explore midwives' behaviour andthe determinants of this behaviour in regard to antenatal care for women withmaternal distress
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE II. Sample survey Convenience sampling (141 clinical placement practices, newsletter KNOV)•N = 112
Digital distributed questionnaire (Questback) structured on TPB•Behaviour constructs according NICE (2007), SOSU (2007)
•Pre-test•7 point Likert response scale 1 – 7
SPSS (19.0)•Cronbach’s Alpha scores•Principal Component Analysis •Multiple regression analysis (TPB)
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
Expanded model Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB)Personal/ demographic Details age, work Attitude sub-
experience, education, work- behaviour, maternalrelated stress distress, prevention in general
Subjective norm
Work-related details Intention BEHAVIOURpractice size, practice- screening,
assistant, routine provision support, referral,
health information Self-efficacy collaboration
Knowledge source
pre-registration, post- registration, LLL, self-study,
web, practice, personal Barriers
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
Characteristics participants N = 112Variable Mean (SD) N / %Age 36.12 (10.03)
Experience (in years) 11.76 (9.44)
Education: diploma 30 / 26.8% BSc 75 / 67.0%
MSc/ PhD 7 / 6.3%
Work-related stress (scale 1 – 7 strongly disagree – strongly agree) 4.08 (1.08)
Practice size: solo 8 / 7.1%
duo 15 / 13.4%
3-4 midwives 53 / 47.3%
5 or more midwives 34 / 30.4%
Practice assistant 72 / 64.3%
Routine provision health information 84 / 75 %
Main knowledge source: pre-registration 20 / 17.9%
post-registration 8 / 7.1%
congresses/ seminars/ work-shops 24 / 21.4%
self-study 6 / 5.4%
web 1 / 0.9%
practice experience 46 / 41.1%
personal experience 7 / 6.3%
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
Screening behaviour Maternal Distress (MD) 4.48 (SD 0.75)(1 strongly disagree – 7 strongly agree)
Routinely asking for MD at booking and subsequent antenatal visits
Routine use of standardized question for MD at booking
Use of a validated screening questionnaire at booking when MD is reported or as routine practice
Trying to establish the source when MD is reported
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
Multiple regression screening behaviour
Positive contribution Negative contribution
R2 .511 Sig. F Change <. 001
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
Supportive behaviour Maternal Distress Mean 5.61 (SD 0.40)(1 strongly disagree – 7 strongly agree)
Actions at booking: reporting in file, re-visiting the subject, awaiting further development
Actions at subsequent antenatal visits: further exploration of problems, advice on how to cope, extra visit, home-visit, asking what the woman needs from midwife, reporting in file, re-visiting the subject
Information provision of maternal transition, psychological changes during the childbirth process, consequences of maternal distress
Asking about feelings and evaluating the experience of the (forthcoming) birth
Use of guideline ‘Antenatal support’
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
Multiple regression supportive behaviour
Positive contribution Negative contribution
R2 .620 Sig. F Change < .001
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
Referral behaviour to other (specified) health professionals Mean 5.61 (SD 0.51) (1 strongly disagree – 7 strongly agree)
Advice to seek a health professional for maternal distress at booking or subsequent antenatal visit
Active referral to a health professional for maternal distress
Use of a health & social care map
Referral to specified health professional (General Practitioner, obstetrician, paediatrician, psychologist, social worker, alternative therapist, antenatal education, organization for mental health care (GGZ), psychological coach, outpatient services for pregnancy and psychiatry (POP), social services)
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
Multiple regression referral behaviour to other (specified) health professionals
Referral behaviour
Self-efficacy β=.356 t=3.501 p= .001
Positive contribution Negative contribution R2 .364 Sig. F Change .002
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
Collaborative behaviour with other health professionals Mean 5.09 (SD 1.01) (1 strongly disagree – 7 strongly agree)
Internal practice discussions/ meetings of women with maternal distress and clients
Consultation of General Practitioner
Transfer of information to other health professionals (health visitor, maternity care)
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
Multiple regression collaborative behaviour
Positive contribution Negative contribution
R2 .319 Sig. F Change .013
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
PHASE II. Sample surveyCONCLUSION• Various determinants are associated with the different
constructs of behaviour • Screening behaviour has many determinants in
comparison to the other behaviour constructs• Multiple psychosocial issues play a role in regard to
screening behaviour while only attitude is associated with support and self-efficacy with referral and for collaboration psychosocial issues hardly play a role
IMPLICATIONS• The findings of this study will be used to contribute to the
development of an intervention
Faculty of Midwifery Education & StudiesMaastricht
REFERENCES
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. Vol.50:179–211
Buist, A., Bilszta, J., Milgrom, J., Barnett, B., Hayes, B., Austin, M.-P. (2006) Health professional’s knowledge and awareness of perinatal depression: Results of a national survey. Women and Birth. Vol. 19: 11-16
Jones, C. J., Creedy, D. K., Gamble, J. A. (2011) Australian midwives’ knowledge of antenatal and postpartum depression: A national survey. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. Vol. 56 (4): 353-361
McCauley, K., Elsom, S., Muir-Cochrane, E. (2011) Midwives and assessment of perinatal health. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. Vol. 18: 786-795
NICE (2007)Antenatal and postnatal mental health. NICE clinical guideline 45. National Institute for Clinical Excellence
SOSU (2007) Perinatal depressive and anxiety disorders. Statewide Obstetric support Unit. Western Australia: Women and Newborn Health Service.
Yelland, J., McLachlan, H., Forster, D., Rayner, J., Lumley, J. (2007) How is maternal psychosocial health assessed and promoted in the early postnatal period? Midwifery. Vol. 23: 287-297