factors a˜ecting decisions p-28-037 · 2. providing infrastructure and facilities for bicycle...

1
Factors Affecting Decisions on Bicycle Use for non-Bike Users in Thailand * P-28-037 Naknaen, P. & Jewton, B., Rajamangkala Srivijaya Technology University, Trang Panswad, T., Thailand Cycling Club Aswabunyalert, J. & Chutathaweesawat, S., King Mongkut Institute of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok Na Nakhon, W. & Choothong, S., Rajamangkala Srivijaya Technology University, Nakhon Si Thammarat Pidtangnapho, W., Naresuan University, Phitsanulok Piriyawat, S., Burapa University, Chon Buri Poonpanyawong, T., Chumphon Cycling Club, Chumphon Samran, S., Rajabhat University, Loei Srisawat, A., Northeastern Region Strategic Institute, Khon Kaen Thaweewut, T., Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani Songkittipakdee, W., Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning Cycling family members Cycling community member Cycling celebrities and politicians Gaining more companions and friends Proven cost-sa ving Potentially worsened traffic in future Wide, good-conditioned foot path No obstruction from street hawkers No parking cars allowed on st reet Safe and convenient cycle sys tem Hospitality of car drivers Bike buddy for beginners Shady path No air pollution Physical activity and fit ness Touring and recrea tion Background Though cycling has gained more public interest in Thailand for the past 5-10 years, the emphasis was unfortunately mainly on serious physical exercise or sport and long distance touring as a recreation, which the majority of the people could neither do nor join. To promote cycling in daily life, making it a social culture, Thailand Cycling Club (TCC) came up with a ‘Walking and Cycling in Daily Life Public Policy Advocacy Project’ to make such promotion work effective and continuous. This study recommends key factors that aim to convert people who have not yet used bicycle in their daily life to regularly use bicycle as their key mode of transport. Findings In this study, 16 factors that may positively influence such transformation were investigated. It was apparent that the most influencing factor was the physical activity and fitness with the score of 3.94 out of maximum 5. Following priorities were shady path (3.54), no air pollution (3.45), touring and recreation (3.38) and hospitality of car drivers (3.33). The lowest score is surprisingly the influence from cycling celebrities and politicians, which denotes that general public or laypersons who are not keen on serious cycling but potential future bicycle users, are not to be convinced by this kind of public relations nor campaign approach and the local authority should take note of this unconventional perception. Recommendations 1. Campaign on benefits of cycling, focusing on health both physically and mentally, and environmental protection. 2. Providing infrastructure and facilities for bicycle users, especially networks of bicycle lanes/paths that connect residential areas with workplaces and other places in people’s daily activities. 3. Good design of streets and bicycle lanes/paths of various widths, including installment of street furniture to provide shade, lighting and protection from motorized vehicles, and parking facilities in public spaces and buildings that prioritise bicycle users. * In this study, a questionnaire was used to inquire a total sample of 1,671 persons in both urban and rural areas in 9 provinces, including Bangkok, Chon Buri, Chumphon, Khon Kaen, Loei, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Phitsanulok, Trang and Ubon Ratchathani. http://www.thaicyclingclub.org/

Upload: others

Post on 04-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Factors A˜ecting Decisions P-28-037 · 2. Providing infrastructure and facilities for bicycle users, especially networks of bicycle lanes/paths that connect residential areas with

Factors A�ecting Decisions on Bicycle Use for non-Bike Users in Thailand*

P-28-037

Naknaen, P. & Jewton, B., Rajamangkala Srivijaya Technology University, Trang Panswad, T., Thailand Cycling ClubAswabunyalert, J. & Chutathaweesawat, S., King Mongkut Institute of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok Na Nakhon, W. & Choothong, S., Rajamangkala Srivijaya Technology University, Nakhon Si Thammarat Pidtangnapho, W., Naresuan University, Phitsanulok Piriyawat, S., Burapa University, Chon Buri Poonpanyawong, T., Chumphon Cycling Club, Chumphon Samran, S., Rajabhat University, Loei Srisawat, A., Northeastern Region Strategic Institute, Khon Kaen Thaweewut, T., Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani Songkittipakdee, W., Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning

Cycl

ing

fam

ily m

embe

rs

Cyc

ling

com

mun

ity m

embe

r

Cycl

ing

cele

briti

es a

nd p

oliti

cian

s

Gai

ning

mor

e co

mpa

nion

s and

frie

nds

Prov

en c

ost-

savi

ng

Pote

ntia

lly w

orse

ned

tra�

c in

futu

re

Wid

e, g

ood-

cond

ition

ed fo

otpa

th

No

obst

ruct

ion

from

stre

et h

awke

rs

No

park

ing

cars

allo

wed

on

stre

et

Safe

and

con

veni

ent c

ycle

syst

em

Hos

pita

lity

of c

ar d

river

s

Bike

bud

dy fo

r beg

inne

rs

Shad

y pa

th

No

air p

ollu

tion

Phys

ical

act

ivity

and

�tn

ess

Tour

ing

and

recr

eatio

n

BackgroundThough cycling has gained more public interest in Thailand for the past 5-10 years, the emphasis was unfortunately mainly on serious physical exercise or sport and long distance touring as a recreation, which the majority of the people could neither do nor join. To promote cycling in daily life, making it a social culture, Thailand Cycling Club (TCC) came up with a ‘Walking and Cycling in Daily Life Public Policy Advocacy Project’ to make such promotion work e�ective and continuous. This study recommends key factors that aim to convert people who have not yet used bicycle in their daily life to regularly use bicycle as their key mode of transport.

FindingsIn this study, 16 factors that may positively in�uence such transformation were investigated. It was apparent that the most in�uencing factor was the physical activity and �tness with the score of 3.94 out of maximum 5. Following priorities were shady path (3.54), no air pollution (3.45), touring and recreation (3.38) and hospitality of car drivers (3.33). The lowest score is surprisingly the in�uence from cycling celebrities and politicians, which denotes that general public or laypersons who are not keen on serious cycling but potential future bicycle users, are not to be convinced by this kind of public relations nor campaign approach and the local authority should take note of this unconventional perception.

Recommendations1. Campaign on bene�ts of cycling, focusing on health both physically and mentally, and environmental protection.

2. Providing infrastructure and facilities for bicycle users, especially networks of bicycle lanes/paths that connect residential areas with workplaces and other places in people’s daily activities.

3. Good design of streets and bicycle lanes/paths of various widths, including installment of street furniture to provide shade, lighting and protection from motorized vehicles, and parking facilities in public spaces and buildings that prioritise bicycle users.* In this study, a questionnaire was used to inquire a total sample of 1,671 persons in both urban and rural areas in 9 provinces,

including Bangkok, Chon Buri, Chumphon, Khon Kaen, Loei, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Phitsanulok, Trang and Ubon Ratchathani.

http://www.thaicyclingclub.org/