facing the tiger - a learnshop on collaboration - dr. john j. scherer
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Facing the TigerA Learnshop on Collaboration
How to Turn Differences into Creative Change
Dr. John J. Scherer
© 2013, Scherer Leadership International
© 2004, John J. Schererwww.SchererCenter.com
2
PINCH
Role Clarity &Commitment
Stability, Confidence &Productivity
Disruption of Shared
Expectations
Ambiguity,uneasiness
Anxiety, resentment, blaming, guilt
CRUNCH
STALEMATE
Facing the Tiger:The Pinch Theory
ResentfulTermination Premature
Reconciliation
Planned Reconciliation
terminationafter
reconciliation
Reconciliation Under Duress
Adapted from 'A Model for Couples: How Two Can Grow Together' by John J. Sherwood & John J. Scherer, Journal for Small Group Behavior, February, 1975.
Gathering Data, Sharing & Clarifying
Expectations
Polarity Management:
How to Turn Differences of Opinion into Creative Solutions
and a Stronger Team
From Barry Johnson’s Polarity Management. Used with permission.
© 2013, Scherer Leadership International
4
• The human mind is pre-set to choose, to prefer, to
take a position, rather than embrace a more complex reality: polarity.
• Many unresolved problems are actually polarities
not being managed where BOTH positions are needed.
• What you think are ‘either/or’ situations may in fact
be ‘both/and’ situations.
• In a polarity, the more you emphasize one position (pole), the more important the other position (pole)
becomes.
• Rather than being ‘right’ or ‘wrong,’ all polarities have an up-side and a down-side.
• People who have become ‘positional’ and locked in
on one pole have lost access to the (missing) up-side of the other (‘enemy’) position.
• Managing polarities requires acknowledging the
down-side of your position and the up-side of the other pole.
Principles of Polarity Management
4
© 2013, Scherer Leadership International
‘Position’ A
‘Position’ B
Managing ‘Difference’:The Default Options
‘Win-Lose’ Approach: ‘I win; you lose. I’m right; you’re wrong.’
5
Compromise: ‘Let’s don’t fight. Let’s agree to disagree.’
© 2013, Scherer Leadership International
‘Positive’
RichSuccessChangeMy Way
BuildWinning
Wielding PowerClear
ResultFasterSave
Be Safe
Polarity Management
‘Negative’
PoorFailureStabilityYour WayBuyLosingYielding PowerFlexibleProcessMore deliberateInvestTry Something New
6
© 2013, Scherer Leadership International
Position A
Position B
Polarity Management:The Problem
Potential Upsides
Potential Downsides
Potential Upsides
Potential Downsides
7
© 2013, Scherer Leadership International
8
RestActivity
C
RelaxedRejuvenated
BoringLoss of Energy
D
A
StimulatedChallenged
TenseOverwhelmed
B
Polarity Management™ Tapping the Infinite Energy System
8
© 2013, Scherer Leadership International
Position A
Position B
9
The Three Worlds
Bridging the GapDr John J. Scherer
Adapted by John Scherer in 1985 from 'The Interpersonal Gap' theory by John Wallen, 1960, and from the concept and experience of 'Percept Language' from John and Joyce Weir, 1968.
© 2013, Scherer Leadership International
11
'Husband' 'Wife'
'Late for Dinner Experience'My Observations
© 2013, Scherer Leadership International
12
THEIR World THE World
The Three Worlds
TheirINTENTION
(Come from)
TheirACTION
MY World
MyINTERPRETATION
(What I 'See')
What the other person thinks, feels, wants and intends. What is going on inside them, heavily influenced by theirhistory (Somebody Training).
How their Intention getstranslated into ACTION.What they DO as a result of allthat--which is visible toanyone nearby. 'Just the facts,' as Joe Friday would say.
What I 'get' about their action.Actually what I 'made up' about it, based on my own history--since I do not have access to their intention(s), nor to theirworld. I 'see' my own history--
© 2013, Scherer Leadership International
13
The Three Worlds
AnyAction
PossibleIntention A
PossibleIntention B
PossibleIntention CPossibleIntention D
PossibleIntention E
PossibleIntention F
PossibleIntention G
PossibleInterpretation A
PossibleInterpretation BPossibleInterpretation CPossibleInterpretation D
PossibleInterpretation E
PossibleInterpretation F
PossibleInterpretation G
THEIR World THE World MY World
What is the likelihood that my interpretation will match the other person's world of meaning and intention, given the infinite alternatives?
© 2013, Scherer Leadership International
Shifting the D.R.A.M.A.
DESCRIBE the trigger event to the other person. (Clean, no “spin,” just the facts.)
REVEAL your world of interpretation--and own it as your own. (“In my world, what I made up about what happened was. . .”)
ASK them what was happening in their world, then listen 110% like an Anthropologist. (“What was going on in your world?”) SHOW them you heard what they said.
MAKE a REQUEST that breaks the pattern--and offer your support. (“Next time. would you be willing to. . .?”)
AGREE to another conversation--with a by when—to speak honestly about how the agreement is working. Make a new agreement.
© 2013, Scherer Leadership International
15
What have you seen, heard, or learned that you want to remember and/or put into practice at work--or at home?
A-Ha! Worksheet