facil»:50-389 st's 1 lucie planti unit power light'o ... · sl2-er-ol uestion no. 310. 1...

REGULATO INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION .STEM (RIDS)

ACE'ESSI ON" NBR! 8 1 0728020 4 DOC ~ DATE 8 1 /07/22 NOTARIZED NO

FACIL»:50-389 St's Lucie Planti Unit 2<, Florida Power 8 Light'o;AUTH ~ NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION

UHRIGg R ~ E ~ Florida Power L I.ight Co ~

REC IP ~ NAMEI RECIPIENT AFFILIATIONEISENHUTpDOG, Division of Licensing

COPIESLTTR ENCL

1 1

1= 1

RECIPIENTID CODE/NAME

LIC. BR ¹3 BC 18NERSESgV ~ 05»

SUBJECT: Forwar ds response to Siting Ahalysis Branch 810318 request"ti

~ for addi info for incorporation into faci1 i ty envir on r opt/OL~,

OISTRISUTION COOS:: COOIS COPIES RECEIVES:LiTR -1'NCL'I. SIZET'I TLEi! Ehvi ron ~ Report Amendments 8 Re 1 a ted Cor r espondence»

NOTES: ".

RECIPIENT COPIESID CODE/NAME'TTR<

ENCLL'CTIONSLIC BR ¹3» LA 19 1 1

DOCKEiTI ¹05000389

INTESTINAL: ENV ENG BR ObILE» 15»

G FIlE 0108

1 1

2 21 0

1 1

1 1

HYD/GEO BRNRC PDR 02"RAD ASMT BR 09SIT'NAL'R 07

1=-

iI1

EXTERNAL: ACRSNSIC

20.04

31 1

LPDRNTIS

03

TOTAL NURSER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 19 ENCI. 18

/

E C

ffl ~ t

II'

E

ffff .I f'

I

i,

E

E

+@II/g

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

July 22, 1981L-81-307

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regul a tionAttention: Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director

Division of LicensingU. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D. C. 20555

Dear Mr. Eisenhut:

Re: St. Lucie Unit 2Docket No. 50-389Request For Additional Information,ER-OL Review

Attached is Florida Power 8 Light Company's response to the March 18, 1981Siting Analysis Branch request for additional information (guestions 310.1,310.6, 310.7, and 310.8). This response will be incorporated into theSt. Lucie Plant Unit "2 Environmental Report -'Operatin'g License in a futureamendment.

Very truly yours,

Robert E. UhrigVice PresidentAdvanced Systems 8 Technology

REU/TCG/bs

Attachments

CC: Harold F. Reis, Esquire (w/o attachments)

goot5

8107280204 810722PDR ADOCK 05000389C PDR

PFOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE

SL2-ER-OL

uestion No.

310. 1

I

The projections of age distribution for the year 2000(Sections 2.1.2.1.6 and 2.1.2.2.8) are based on 1970 U.S.data. However, it is the case that:

The data were about eight years old when usedThe U.S. population is "aging" as the postwarbabies mature.Florida has an older population than the U.S.Florida's population grew by 28 percent between1970 and 1977 (2.1.2.2.5)90 percent of Florida's growth is attributable tonet migration (2.1.2.2.5)more relevant bases of age distribution existsuch as U.S. Bureau of Census, Current PopulationReports, Series P-25, No. 796, "IllustrativeProjections of State Populations by Age, Race,and Sex. 1975 to 2000," U.S. Government PrintingOffice, Mashington, DC 1979.

Present revised Tables 2.1-2 and 2.1-4 using a moreappropriate age distribution base.

~Res onse

Tables 2.1-2 and 2.1-4 are revised estimates of the agedistribution of the projected population for the year 2000between zero and ten miles and ten and fiftymiles of StLucie Unit 2. The new age distribution estimates werebased on the projections for the State of Florida presentedin the U.S Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Censuspublication entitled Illustrative Pro'ections of StatePo ulation b A e Race and Sex 1975 to 2000. The newfactors used to estimate the age distribution in the year2000 are as follows:

Age Group % of Total PopulationYear 2000

0-1112'-1819 and over

14.49.4

76.2

310. 1-1

I

II

t)F

0 D

SL2"ER"OL

TABLE 2.1-2

AGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROJECTED POPULATION FOR THE YEAR 2000WITHIN TEN NILES OF ST LUCIE UNIT 2

N 0 0 0

NNE 0 0 0 0 0

0-1 miles 1 "2 milesSector 12* 12-18** 18*** 12 )2-18 18

2-3 ~iles12 12-18 18

0 0

0, 0 0

3-4 miles 4-5 miles

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

12 12-18 18 12 12-18 185-10 miles

12

0 0 0

0 0

12-18 )8 12

Total0-10 miles

12-18

0

18g89

Total0-10miles

A~ll a ea

HO

0 0

0 0

0 0

NE

ENE 0 0 0

E 0 0 0

.ESE 0 0 0

SE 0 0 0

SSE 0 0 0

S 0 0 0

SSW 0 0 0

SW 0 0 0

WSW 0 0 0

W 0 . 0 0

'hill 0 0 0

NW,O 0 ~ 0

NNW 0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 096

J-5

eo+8

0 0 0

l92- /e

SL) << Z9

0 0 0 0 0

/0 736

9'I

7'3 A/8

/I35 24

0 0

7 /28Z. /

0

zS

36

0 0

9085

48.

0

zs68538

ISgg899

0 0/o~ g,R-

5»+46

Goo /'P74+50 0 0

0 0 ' ' 0

0

0

8,

LS>

05'5

986

98'V

Sg99

.-0s3)

5&~ozg

4e6'

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0'

0

0/o5'//

II/o.

0

I(8

Q.t

0 0 0 0 0

78 +z,C ~Q 105 //oo&+46 SB 316

'" D''" 42'I 19/ 25$ /6& /345 /IS3

B& +93-'2'>Z-

26r/I a'lV //'BC 59'lo+8 %. 447 64 8M l~

+VV -S/2- ZSas Scl 556 //SO5 2ej8O69 808 489

LM ~+69 g'b7 4/4 54'72 589

ez. >SS eve ~zb zambo4&7 246 ~ 878

5 g I 3L 2/ /bg BOZO

gO ro2 I7Z IIZ, 9o8 SW46- ~ 16 ~ 901- .

//bh 9')~hl ~~9~~i> ./~/7

7

76

/I7j304 ~~ 1~ 6v849 2~

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

0

/689'755

RQ

z87$

91'{

78(

682.

,0 0'5't

0

S~y ISBq4r98QF977 I/53

kg&&6/o'// /kg

2

VZD9 Llgg

/SZ /0 '/god5j-348

ZoS9 I'f93

>8 /IV7

~ 2+Z, lo/If

0

49o

7Z5

/SS

S'l9

/8&@

2'5't465'3R434

M&0

367

'lV7b M7b ZA Zcg35 lSS'OZ.

0200

SESS

C /o/6

l /QZ.7

ZS~>897

43~SZ.O$ 7

>MZ7

/oVQ+

0ZQZ.

&ac'l6-,~

Io/2.2.

ISZ ~8-~57&~7~5e'a+

~ 8'515

-yz,sS

/~F9 VAel~+Persons el ven years of age or younger.

**Persons between and including twelve to eighteen years*~Persons nineteen years of age or older.

of age'.

I~ ~

II

SL2-ER-OL

TABLE 2.1-4

ACE DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROJECTED POPULATION FOR THE YEAR 2000BETWEEN TEN AND 50 MELES OF ST LUCIE UNIT 2

10-20 miles 20-30 miles 30"40 miles 40-50 miles Total 10-50 miles

Total10-50miles

Sector

NNE

NE

ESE

12=- 12-18** 18*78*

0

12 12-) 8 18

0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

12 12-'18 18 12 12-18

0 0

0 0

0 .0

~ 0

0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

18

0 ~

12 12-18

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

18 A~ll a aa

0

~ 0

SE

SSE

S

SSW

SW

WSW

W

NNW

0

19OZ

q~9L

I9'f

0

qgICC+rt9

~~59~I~7S7

0I2'It

Z9/8$

ZVO4'

zll)oS

2goO

~6899

3Z/0

0/oob'f

z jo5b

Z~994%939

z~VS

0-zg,L1-,998

3SO-746

I'/VS/

Wo73

0 0qSZ2. zSZl

3

IR~

819 57/420

0 0

0 0

0'2'6/

294

9~8 Cn,s-

i~ca /olfe

0zzaba

7 5'g688

'/0K

ZZ.0&

0

ISof~vfoS~

0 0 0 0ICkl 957o 7>4-,79 2'/723

l+P44 4&P3688. 88-,8RICOS II/5 9OZO /7>Z.9&(440 ~598

37 Zg /9'/ 9VS94 164

~ IQ I~ l~i A<K84. ~85

Z.~'f IVS2 I/77/ Iai/+)+47- .203

zaSQ /3>1 Ioi'pro g 97hz8kQ ~ 466

8

'

8'H3 SZZ. zdO'7

0

CS~, 'IVV ~6~'t

~S6'7'+?-7S II87'867~498 ~ 7&480

0

/6IS9

«S 7'516z624

id'85

I68O

e6

/O'V

/8

0ISO8

958/7~43999%

4@206/36/ /

69'/

/5'7/1~

0 0

~By zan,'+6

0 0l/S g Z.9711

57

ZV/23 IS7'/7

Z2,9g

>choo

gv4553pss zan&@347'. ~XSSM

Z79Z. IR/b

'/'//6 ~esca

IIC89 7~oAMER>/S- 96'/IS 452hZ

20~58 VA~ 9&;L5$

0vs/alo2~IZ7MO~48IZ 16~-~6

/2'AS

IZQVPg

z.%567'L~~I8$ 2-

5 +44~~/Z,7/Zg48+zO&7

0>

316,719

167,520

15,960

23,978

16,358

19,'321

1,310

30,666

81 171

673>003

*Persons eleven years of age or younger."'*Persons betvaen and including tvelve to eighteen years of age.

<""~Persons nineteen years of age or older.

n

I ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

r ~ ~

~ I

W

E

r

II ~ II

~ II

SL2-ER-OL

Question No.

310.6 The Hutchinson Island Residential Units Section (2 .1.3 .5 .1)reports construction of a 203 unit apartment and 32 unittownhouse complex called Sand Dollar Villas to be completed in1980 'and Dollar Villas is 1.4 miles from the plant site.

Response

The 1983 resident population forecasts (Figure 2.1-6, sheet3'f

8) indicate 36 residents between 1 and 2 miles from thesite in sectors SE and SSE ~ The 1983 peak daily and seasonaltransient population (Figure 2.1-10, sheet 3 of '8) for thesame sectors is 0. Reconcile the inconsistencies between thereported construction and the population forecasts for bothresident and transient population within two miles of theplant ~

v

In 1981, Sand Dollar Villas contained 203 completedresidential units. 'iscussions with the developer indicatedthat an additional 162 units would be completed by 1983, andanother 144 units by 1986(1) ~ Based on 1980 preliminarycensus figures for St Lucie County, it was estimated that thehousehold size on Hutchinson Island is approximately 0.44persons per dwelling unit. This factor was used to derive thefollowing resident population figures for Sand Dollar Villas.Transient population in Sand Dollar Villas will be composed oftwo components: 1) people who occupy their condominiumsduring the tourist season (winter); and, 2), visitors tofriends and relatives- Together, these two components are'expected to increase the population in Sand Dollar Villas by afactor of 3.6 times the resident population.'he followingtable shows both resident and transient population for SandDollar Villas. Sand Dollar Villas is located in annularsectors SSE 1-2 and SE 1-2 ~

YearAnnularSector

ResidentPopulation

Tra'nsientPopulation

19 81 SSE 1-2SE 1-2

4545

162162

1983 SSE 1-2SE 1-2

45116

162418

19 86 SSE 1-2SE 1-2

108116

389418

Ref erence

(1) Personal Communication, Sand Dollar Villas Sales Office, Stuart,Florida, May, 1981.

SL2-ER-OL

Question No.

310.7 The ER-CP for St Lucie Unit No. 2 states that "stud1esconducted to date indicate that the land available fordevelopment on Hutchinson Island will be almost totallyutilized by the end of this decade (by 1980) ~ ~

." p. 2-2-4Rev. 6-5/9/75

'utureres1dential development on Hutchinson Island "whichfalls within the five mile radius is expected to experienceconsiderable development" (ER-OL 2.1.3.6 part b) . The samesection discusses the limited fresh water supply being aconstra1nt to growth on the island. Are there plans to expandthe supply of potable water to the island'l If so, when andhow would residential development of this island be affected?

Re sponse There are plans to expand the water'upply on HutchinsonIsland The Fort Pierce Ut1lities Author1ty (FPUA) plans toconstruct a 16 inch water main to a point approximately 3.5miles south of St Luc1e Unit 2(l) ~ This water main is beinginstalled to serve Island Dunes, a 572 unit high risedevelopment which is scheduled for completion by 1988. Thefirst building of Island Dunes will be completed in December,1982( ) . The FPUA water main serving Island 3)uncs is inaddition to the 12-inch FPUA main already serving HutchinsonIsland between St Lucie Unit 2 and the southern boundary of StLucie County.

Other plans to expand the water supply on Hutchinson Islandinvolve the construction of deep wells to the FloridanAquifer. These wells employ a desalinization process called"reverse osmosis"- They are being constructed by developersnot served by public water supplies. On Hutchinson Island,all planned developments, except for Island Dunes and thoseprojects with1n the City of Fort Pierce, will be providingtheir own potable water with the reverse osmosis process.This desalinization process is being encouraged by the SouthFlor1da Water Management District (SFWMD), and at presentthere do not appear to be any constraints, other than cost, toproviding potable water in 'this manner(3) . Furthermore, theSFWMD,indicates that the reverse osmosis desalinizationprocess "may soon become competitive with conventionaltreatment plants in terms of cost and rel1ab1lity"(4) .

310 .7-1

SL2-E R-OL

The above plans to expand the potable water supply onHutchinson Island appear to be encouraging new developmentthere. Current plans for new development on the Island areextensive. The response to Question 310 .8 tabulates thenew developments which have been constructed recently orare planned within 5 miles of St Lucie 2. A total of 763residential units were constructed in this area between1978 and 1981; plans exist to build another 1,628 units by1988. Development elsewhere on Hutchinson Island, in FortPierce Beach and south of the five-mile radius, is alsooccuring at a rapid pace.

References

(1) Personal communication, Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, Fort Pierce,Florida, May 12, 1981.

(2) Personal communication, Island Dunes sales office, Hutchinson Island,Florida,.May ll, 1981.

(3) Personal communication, South Florida Water Management District, WestPalm Beach, Florida, May 15, 1981.

(4) South Florida Water Management District, Summary Status Report, U erEast Coast, Water Use and Supply Development Plan, West Palm Beach,Florida, October, 1980.

370.7-2

SL2-E R-OL

Question No.

310.8 The FES-CP presents an estimated 1980 population for 0-5 milesof 1620 and from 5-10 miles of 61,000 (Figure 2.6) ~ The ER-OLhas estimates for 1980 of 12,291 and 70,594 for the 0-5 and5-10 mile .rings respectively. (Figure 2.1-6) While the 5-10mile population estimates, are only 15 percent off between theFES-CP and the ER-OL, the 0-5 mile estimates are over 650percent different.

a ~ Are there any additional developments (besides SandDollar Villas and Oceana) under construction or beingplanned on Hutchinson Island? If so, give location,number of units, estimated date of completion, andrevise res'ident and transient population estimateswithin five miles of the plant to be consistent withthe available information.

b. Revise Table 2.1-12, Land Uses and Land Cover withinFive Miles of St. Lucie Unit 2, to reflect these newdevelopments.

Response

a ~ There are several new developments which have beenconstructed, are under construction or being plannedwithin a five mile radius of St Lucie Unit 2. Table310 .8-1 lists the new developments on HutchinsonIsland and the mainland which have occurred between1978 and 1981. Table 310 .8-2 lists those developmentswhich are under construction or being planned. Bothtables give the location of the development, the totalnumber of units planned, and the expected completiondate.

1

~ The resident and transient populations estimateswithin five miles of the plant have been revised toreflect the increased growth rate resulting fromdevelopment activities on Hutchinson Island and themainland within five miles of the plant. The revisedresident and transient populations are given in Tables310.8-3 and 310.8-4 ~

b) Table 2.1-12, Land Uses and Land Cover within FiveMiles of St Lucie Unit 2, has been changed to reflectthe new residential development which has occurredbetween 1978 and 1981 (See also Table"310.8-1 in part"a" of this answer.)

TABLE 310.8-1

NEW DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN 5 MILES OF ST LUCIE UNIT 2

BETWEEN 1978-1981 (AS OF MAY, 1981)

On Hutchinson Island:

Sand DollarVillas

Ocean Towers

Island Village

Sheraton Condo(Formerly SheratonMote 1)

Oceana

MainLand:

Location byAnnular Sector

SE 1-2SSE 1-2

SSE 4-5

SSE 4-5

SSE 4-5

SSE 4-5

Total Numberof Units

'03

158

32

84

286

CompletionDate

1981

1981

1981

1978

1981

Golf Village

Midport

SW 3-44-5

SSW 4-5SW 4-5

617

375

1980

1981

SOURCES: '981 Aerial Photographs, Flown by Southern Resource MappingCorporation, Ormond Beach, FLA, April 1981, Scale 1:9600; Fieldstudies, May 1981 ~

TABLE 310.8-2

FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN 5 MILES OF ST LUCIE UNIT 2(1981 to FUTURE)

On Hutchinson Island:

Sand DollarVillas

Island Dunes

Location byAnnular Section

SE 1-2 andSSSE 1-2

SSE 3-4

Total Numberof Units

162144

108540

CompletionDate

19831986

19821987or

1988

IslandVillage'slandia

SSE 4-5

SSE 4-5

102

388184

1982

19831986

Mainland:

Saddle Club

,The Grove

Savannah Club

WNW 4-5NW 4-5

SW 2-3SW 3-4SW 4-5WSW 2-3WSW 3-4WSW 4-5

700 (Note:only 413 unitsare estimatedto be in thefive mile area.)

576

2560

1985

Before1990

„,

Before1990

Midport (Part ofPort St Lucie)

SSW 3-4

SSW 4-5SW 3-4SW 4-5

426

380976

End of198119831990

SOURCE: 1) Personal Communication, St Lucie County Area Coordinator,Fort Pierce, Florida, May, 1981.

2) Personal Communication, Treasure Coast Regional PlanningCommission, Stuart, Florida, May, 1981.

3) Field studies, May 1981 '

Sheet 1 of 7

SL2-E R-OL

TABLE 310.8-3

RESIDENT POPULATION WITHIN 5 MILES OF ST LUCIE UNIT 21981

'AnnularSector 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5

Total0-5

N /

NNE

NE

ENE

0

0

0 0

0 0

0 = 0

0

ESE

SE

SSE

SSW

SW

WSW

0

45

45

0

37

47

12

70

16,

30

77

0

145

20

241

213

515

49

0 45

945 990

150 295

556 646

2160 2454

3468 3531

503 '58892 1484

84 133

NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 186 193 1199 8718 10336

J

h

V

Sheet 2 of 7

SL2-ER-OL

TABLE 310.8-3


AnnuIarSector 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5

Total0-5

N 124 124

'NNE 0

NE

ENE

ESE

SE

SSE

SSW

0

0

130

87

0

102

70

137

145

75

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 130

1246 1572

150 295

620 765

SW

WSW

37

47

12

0

23

24

40

77

260 2926 3246

64 3517 3652

274 564 890

533 952 1562

49 84 133

NNW 0 53 23 27 34 137

Total 490 359 15 64 10093 12506

,t

I(

Sheet 3 of 7

SL2-ER-OL

TABLE 310.8-3


AnnularSector

N

0-1 1-2

313

2-3 3-4 4-5Total

0-5

313

NNE

NE

ENE

, 0 0 0

0 0

0 ~ 0

ESE

SE 150 158

SSE 214 251 512 1457 2434

SSW

SW

WSW

37

47

70

675

201

145

131

2676

1129

150

17 31

4884

3711

295 *

1932

8272

5088

12 55 427 2053 2547

NW

77 610

49

2029

221

2716

270

NNW

Total

0 135 58

908 1395

69

5748

87 349

16323 24374

Sheet 4 of 7

SL2-ER-OL

TABLE 310.8-3


AnnularSector 0-1 1-2 2-3 4-5

Total0-5

N 380 380

NNE .

NE 0 r

ENE 0,

'I E 0

ESE

SE 252 10 0 262

SSE 422 304 822 2108 3656

145 150 '95SSW 0" 70 251 17 91 2112

SW 37 996 3532 5170 9735

WSW, 47 1294 3324 5912 10577

NNW 0

12

33

899

510

77

707

2715

982

49

528

4425

3464

221

1192

7662

4523

303

3326

Total 2082 3968 12348 24433 42831

Sheet 5 of 7

SL2-ER-OL

TABLE 310.8-3

RESIDENT POPULATION WITHIN 5 MILES OP ST LUCIE UNIT 22010

AnnularSector 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5

rTotal0-5

N 380 0 380

NNE

NE 0

ENE 0 0

0

ESE

SE

SSE 0

285

488

10

304 917

0 0

0 295

2326 4035

SSW 70

145 150 295

371 0 2327 2768

SW

WSW

37

47

12

13 20

2394

967

77

4394

5534

5192

1503

5458 11209

8129 16104

6950 13121t

5363 6943

44 0 49 221 314

NNW

Total

0

0

1164

2457

, 935 687 1582 4368

6077 18792 32506 59832

SL2-ER-OL

TABLE 310.8-3

Sheet 6 of 7

RESIDENT POPULATION WITHIN 5 MILES.OF ST LUCIE UNIT 22020

AnnularSector 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5

Total0-5

N

NNE

NE

380 0 0

0 0

0 0

380

ENE

ESE

SE 285 10 0 295

SSE

SSW

SW

WSW

488

37

47

12

304

70

1974

4619

1892

77

917

145

616

6137

10005

8951

1503

2326 4035

150 295

2327 3013

6040 14188

12612 27283

11071 21926

5911 7491

NNW

, Total

0

44

1164

2457

935

9881

49 221 314

687 1582 4368

29010 42240 83588

Sheet 7 of 7

SL2-ER-OL

TAHLE 310.8-3


AnnularSector

N

0-1 1-2

380

2-3 3-4 4-5Total0-5

380

NE

ENE

0

ESE

SE

SSE

SSW

0

0 285

488

10

304

70

917

145

725

0

2326

150

2327

295

4035

295

3122

SW

~WSW

37

47

2266

5611

6914

11998

6300 15517

14611 32267

12 2305 10627. 12908 25852

.0 77 1503 6155 7735

44 49 221 314

NNW

Total

0 1164

2457

935

115 70

687

33565

1582 4368

46580, 94180

Sheet 1 of 7

SL2-ER-OL

TABLE 310.8-4

PEAK DAILY TOURISTS AND SEASONAL VISTORS WITHIN5 MILES OF ST LUCIE UNIT 2

1981

AnnularSector 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4

Total0-5

N

NE

ENE

ESE

SE

SSE

0

162

162

0 ~ 0

0 '623507 3669

18

SSW

SW

4 1

1 14

33

130

38

147

WSW 208 212

2 13 52 68

31 5490'.

8

NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 330 12 72 3998, 4412

Sheet 2 of 7

SL2-ER-OL

TABLE 310.8-4


1983

AnnularSector

N

0-1 1-2

446

2-3 3-4 4-5Total0-5

446

NNE 0

NE

ENE

0'

ESE 0 0

SE

~SSE

468

313 367 493

0 468

4591 5764

9 18

SSW

SW 16

37

176

46

195

WSW 211 219

16 56 75

32 57 94

NW

NNW 0 191 83 97 122 493

Total 14 24 463 '75 5264 7826

'heet 3 of 7

SL2-E R-OL

TABLE 310.8-4


1990

AnnularSector 0-1 1-2 2-.3 3-4 4-5

Total0-5

N

NNE

NE 0

1127

0

0

0 1127

0 0

0 0

ENE 0 0 0

E

ESE

SE

SSE

540

770

29

904 1843

0 0

0 0

0 569

5350 8867

10 21

SSW 135

SW

WSW

47

14

187

- 79

342

260

579

356

30 166 201

43 142 190

15 18

NNW

Total

0 486

2930

209

1217

248

2452

'313 1256

6720 13319

SL2-E R-OLSheet 4 of 7

TABLE 310.8-4


2000

AnnularSector 0-1 1-2

1368

2-3 3-4 4-5Total

0-5

1368

. NNE

NE

ENE 0

ESE

SE

SSE

907

1519

36

1094

0 ' 0

0 0 943

2959 7694 13266

SSW

SW

WSW

W

NNW

Total

0

0

3

3236

7040

80

104

41

2545

3912

12

20

283

266

217

79

,1901

5741

13 25

143 169

414 780

473 846

376 s 635

277 362

18 25

4784 12466

14192 30885

SL2-ER-OLSheet 5 of 7

TABLE 310.8-4


2010

AnnularSector 0-1 '1 2 2-3 3-4 4-5

Total0-5

N 13 68 0 1368

NNE

NE

ENE

0 0 0

ESE

SE

SSE

SSW

SW

WSW

NNW

Total

0

0

0

1026

1757

4190

8352

36

1094

106

192

77

3366

4883

0

3301

12

30

352

443

415

120

2473

7150

0 0

0 1062

8479 14631

13 25

186 222

437 898

650 1288

578 1071

429 555

18 26

5695 15724

16485 36870

Sheet 6 of 7

SL2-ER-OL

TABLE 310.8-4


AnnularSector 0-1

1368

2020

2-3 3-4 4-5Total0-5

1368

NNE

NE 0

ENE 0'

ESE

SSE

SSW

SW

WSW

0

0

1026

1757

4

1094

178

416

170

3301.

13

55

552

900

806'35

0

0 1062

8479 14631

14 27

209 270

544 1277

1135 2455

1018 1995

532 674

20 28

NNW

Total

0

0

4190

8353

3366

5273

2473 5695 15724

8239 17 646 39511

Sheet 7 of 7SL2-E R-OL

TABLE 310.8-4


2030

AnnularSector 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5

Total0-5

1368 13 68

NNE 0

NE 0 0

ENE 0

ESE

SE

SSE

0

0 '1026

1757

36

1094

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 1062

3301 '479 14631

SSW

SW

WSW

197

462

189

15

62

614

1001

895

150

15 30

233 302

604 1419

1261 2729

1129 2214

591 749

NNW 0 4190 3366

5 22 31

2473 5695 15724

To tal 0 8355 5359 8516 18029 40259

SL2-ER-OL

TABLE 2.1-12

LAND USES AND LAND COVER HITHIN FIVE MILES OF ST LUCIE UNIT 2

Sheet 1 of 2

4

Level IL and UseClassification

AcreagePercent of Total

Level II Land UseClassification


Level IIILand UseClassification


1. URBAN OR BUILT-UP LAND 3,541 7.0 ll. Residential 2>807 5.5 ill. Single-family Resi-dences

112. Multiple-familyResidences

2 '98

49

5,4

12. Commercial andServices

28

116. Transient Lodgings

122. Retail, CommercialServices

60

22

13. Industrial

14 . Transportation,Communications,and Utilities

14 *

964 2.0

123. Institutional Ser-vices

131. Light Industrial

141 . Highway, PrincipalRoad

142 Railroad

143. St Lucie 1 & 2Facilities

14

210

50

300

.4

.6

17. Other Urban orBuilt-up Land

235 ~ 5

144. Transmission Lines

145. Utility Storage

171. Cemetery

172. Undeveloped Land

173. RecreationFacilities

386

18

10

37

188

.8

.4

2. AGRIQJLTURAL LAND

4 ~ FOREST/MARSH COVER*

541 1.1

10 ~653 21+2

21. Cropland and Pasture 449 .9

22. Other Agricultural 92 ~ 2Land

41. Coniferous Forest/ 7,432 14 .8Freshwater Marsh

212 Citrus Groves

221 ~ Nurseries

222. Old Field

410. Pine FlatwoodFreshwater Marsh

449 .9

9 *

83 .2

5 >116 10.2

411. Freshwater Marsh 2,316. 4.6

Level IL and UseClassification


SL2-ER-OL

TABLE 2 .1-12 (Cont'd)

Level II Land Use AcreageClassification Percent of Total

Level IIILand UseClassification

4 J

Sheet 2 of 2


42. Other Forested',714 5.4Wetland

421 ~ Mangrove 2>714 5.4

5. WATER 34,849 69.3 51. Preshwater 1>243 2.5

21.252. Fresh/Salt Water 10,656

510. Streams and Canals

511. Lakes

520. Estuary

113

1, 130

10,656

~ 2

2 03

21+2

55- Salt Water 22>950 45.6 550. Open Marine Water 22,950 45.6

7. BARREN LAND 682 1.4 71. Natural Barren Land 97 ~ 2

74 Man-made Barren Land 585 1.2

710. Beaches

740. Transitional Areas

741. Extractive

97

390

195

~ 2

.8

.4

50>266 100X 50,266 100X 50,266

"The forest cover is to a great extent concentrated in a transitional area which is primarily marshy but includes relatively dry sites. In addition,the Plorida land use/cover classification system considers mangroves as a type of wetland — hardwood forest. To account for these considerations,the USGS categories of Forest and Wetlands were combined.

<Less than .1X

0 e ~f

t I

.r

J

facil»:50-389 st's 1 lucie planti unit power light'o ... · sl2-er-ol uestion no. 310. 1...

Documents