f 1364 - 92 r97 _rjeznjqtotjsotdfmq_

2
Designation: F 1364 – 92 (Reapproved 1997) e1 Standard Practice for Use of a Calibration Device to Demonstrate the Inspection Capability of an Interferometric Laser Imaging Nondestructive Tire Inspection System 1 This standard is issued under the xed designation F 1364; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A supersc ript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval. e 1 NOTE—3 was modied editorially in March 1998. 1. Scope 1.1 This standard practic e descr ibes the construction and use of a cal ibr ati on dev ice for demons tra tin g the ano mal y dete ction capab ilit y of inter ferometri c lase r imag ing nonde - structive tire inspection system. A common practice within the ind ust ry is to ref er to these sys tems as shearogr aphic/  holographic (S/H) systems. 1.2 This standa rd practic e applies to S/H systems that are used for evaluating the structural integrity of pneumatic tires, (for example, presence or absence of anomalies within the tire). 1.3  This sta nda rd does not purport to add re ss all of the safe ty conc er ns, if any , associ at ed wi th it s us e. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-  priate safety and health practices and determine the applica- bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. 2. Re fere nc ed Docume nt s 2.1 ASTM Adj uncts : Straining Block Drawings 2 3. T ermino log y 3.1  Denitions: 3.1.1  analysis,  n—an act of inspecting the S/H image and asso ciati ng this image with a known calibration refer ence. F 538 3.1.2  anomoly,  n—a change in the st ra in pa tt ern of the rubber surface of a straining block as a result of applied stress brought about through a change in atmospheric pressure on the rubber surface. F 538 3.1.3  shearogram/hologram,  n—th e common term for an interferometric image provided by S/H systems. F 538 3.1.4  she ar ograp hic or holog raphi c (S/H) syst ems,  n—a shear ograp hic or holog raphi c syst em usin g interferometric laser imaging to nondestructively inspect tires. F 538 3.1.5  straining block ,  n—a rigid aluminum test block with a rubber surface on one side capable of simulating an anomaly in a tire (see Fig. 1). F 538 3.1.6  straining block holdi ng xtur e,  na de vi ce for holding one or more straining blocks in the S/H system during the calibration process (see Fig. 2). F 538 4. Summary of Pr ac ti ce 4.1 The stra ini ng blo ck (Fi g. 1) is des ign ed to create an image of a known anomaly against which the performance of the S/H system may be evaluated. This image is created when the rubber, which is affixed to the outer surface of the block, is stressed by a vacuum. The interior of the block is vented to atmospheric pressure through the calibration hole, thus allow- ing a differential pressure on the rubber. 4.2 The size of the holes in a straini ng block can be used to determine the sensitivity of the S/H system. Generally, larger holes are more readily detectable. However, it is possible for a poorly calibrated S/H system to detect some small holes and miss very large ones. Therefore, the calibration holes in the straining blocks vary between diameters of 1 mm (0.04 in.) and 100 mm (4 in.). The straining blocks contain multiple calibra- tion holes. A drawing of the straining blocks is shown in Fig. 1. 4.3 The se str ain ing bloc ks sha ll be pla ced in a ser ies of locations within the S/H system to conrm the detectability of anoma lies over the enti re eld of view withi n the S/H system. An exa mpl e of a typ ica l str ain ing blo ck hol din g xt ure is shown in Fig. 2. 4. 4 By st udyi ng the pr esence and cl ar it y of the fr inge patterns obtained from each straining block an assessment of machine calibration may be made. Adjustments such as optical align ment, laser power , vacuum level , beam ratio modi ca- tions, multiple exposure, viewer maintenance and other alter- ations shall be made to optimize the ability to detect the various hole sizes in the straining blocks. 5. Si gni canc e and Us e 5.1 All S/H systems degr ade with time and use. Therefo re, a calibration procedure for evaluating the operation of an S/H sys tem is des ira ble . Thi s cal ibr ati on pro ced ure pro vid es a method of obtaining an optimized interferometric image pat- tern associated with a given size anomaly. 1 This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F-9 on tires and is the direct respon sibilit y of Subco mmittee F09.10 on Equip ment, Facilities, and Calibration. Curren t editio n approv ed Jan. 10, 1992 . Publis hed March 1992. 2 Available from ASTM Headquarters. Order PCN 12–613640–20. 1 Copyright © ASTM, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States. NOTICE: This standard has either been superceded and replaced by a new version or discontinued. Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information.

Upload: rizy951

Post on 01-Jun-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

8/9/2019 f 1364 - 92 r97 _rjeznjqtotjsotdfmq_

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/f-1364-92-r97-rjeznjqtotjsotdfmq 1/2

Designation: F 1364 – 92 (Reapproved 1997)e1

Standard Practice forUse of a Calibration Device to Demonstrate the InspectionCapability of an Interferometric Laser ImagingNondestructive Tire Inspection System1

This standard is issued under the fixed designation F 1364; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of 

original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A

superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.

e1 NOTE—3 was modified editorially in March 1998.

1. Scope

1.1 This standard practice describes the construction and

use of a calibration device for demonstrating the anomaly

detection capability of interferometric laser imaging nonde-

structive tire inspection system. A common practice within the

industry is to refer to these systems as shearographic/ 

holographic (S/H) systems.1.2 This standard practice applies to S/H systems that are

used for evaluating the structural integrity of pneumatic tires,

(for example, presence or absence of anomalies within the tire).

1.3   This standard does not purport to address all of the

safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the

responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-

 priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-

bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.

2. Referenced Documents

2.1 ASTM Adjuncts:

Straining Block Drawings2

3. Terminology

3.1   Definitions:

3.1.1   analysis,   n—an act of inspecting the S/H image and

associating this image with a known calibration reference.

F 538

3.1.2   anomoly,   n—a change in the strain pattern of the

rubber surface of a straining block as a result of applied stress

brought about through a change in atmospheric pressure on the

rubber surface. F 538

3.1.3  shearogram/hologram,   n—the common term for an

interferometric image provided by S/H systems. F 538

3.1.4   shearographic or holographic (S/H) systems,   n—a

shearographic or holographic system using interferometric

laser imaging to nondestructively inspect tires. F 5383.1.5  straining block , n—a rigid aluminum test block with a

rubber surface on one side capable of simulating an anomaly in

a tire (see Fig. 1). F 538

3.1.6   straining block holding fixture,   n— a device for

holding one or more straining blocks in the S/H system during

the calibration process (see Fig. 2). F 538

4. Summary of Practice

4.1 The straining block (Fig. 1) is designed to create animage of a known anomaly against which the performance of 

the S/H system may be evaluated. This image is created when

the rubber, which is affixed to the outer surface of the block, is

stressed by a vacuum. The interior of the block is vented to

atmospheric pressure through the calibration hole, thus allow-

ing a differential pressure on the rubber.

4.2 The size of the holes in a straining block can be used to

determine the sensitivity of the S/H system. Generally, larger

holes are more readily detectable. However, it is possible for a

poorly calibrated S/H system to detect some small holes and

miss very large ones. Therefore, the calibration holes in the

straining blocks vary between diameters of 1 mm (0.04 in.) and

100 mm (4 in.). The straining blocks contain multiple calibra-

tion holes. A drawing of the straining blocks is shown in Fig.1.

4.3 These straining blocks shall be placed in a series of 

locations within the S/H system to confirm the detectability of 

anomalies over the entire field of view within the S/H system.

An example of a typical straining block holding fixture is

shown in Fig. 2.

4.4 By studying the presence and clarity of the fringe

patterns obtained from each straining block an assessment of 

machine calibration may be made. Adjustments such as optical

alignment, laser power, vacuum level, beam ratio modifica-

tions, multiple exposure, viewer maintenance and other alter-

ations shall be made to optimize the ability to detect the various

hole sizes in the straining blocks.

5. Significance and Use

5.1 All S/H systems degrade with time and use. Therefore,

a calibration procedure for evaluating the operation of an S/H

system is desirable. This calibration procedure provides a

method of obtaining an optimized interferometric image pat-

tern associated with a given size anomaly.

1 This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F-9 on tires and is

the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F09.10 on Equipment, Facilities, and

Calibration.

Current edition approved Jan. 10, 1992. Published March 1992.2 Available from ASTM Headquarters. Order PCN 12–613640–20.

1

Copyright © ASTM, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.

NOTICE: This standard has either been superceded and replaced by a new version or discontinued.

Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information.

8/9/2019 f 1364 - 92 r97 _rjeznjqtotjsotdfmq_

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/f-1364-92-r97-rjeznjqtotjsotdfmq 2/2