extra credit question

41
Extra credit question The genes (loci) that influence quantitative traits are known as: _________________________

Upload: dympna

Post on 05-Jan-2016

17 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Extra credit question. The genes (loci) that influence quantitative traits are known as: _________________________. Uses of heritability. The degree to which offspring resemble their parents is determined by the narrow-sense heritability h 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Extra credit question

Extra credit question

The genes (loci) that influence quantitative traits are known as:

_________________________

Page 2: Extra credit question

Uses of heritability

• The degree to which offspring resemble their parents is determined by the narrow-sense heritability h2

• The efficacy of natural and artificial selection is also determined by h2

Page 3: Extra credit question

h2 = 1

h2 = 0

VA/VP = 1

VA/VP = 0

Page 4: Extra credit question

Efficacy of artificial selection: size of Labradors

Page 5: Extra credit question

Breeder’s Question

Q: A horse breeder wants to win the Kentucky Derby. If she breeds her mare to a really fast stallion, how likely is it that the colt will be faster than all the other three-year-olds when it runs in the Derby?

A: It depends on the heritability of running speed!

Page 6: Extra credit question

Breeder’s Equation

• R = h2 S• S = Selection differential difference between selected parents and the population

as a whole (within a generation)

• R = response to selection difference between selected offspring and the unselected

population (across generations)

Page 7: Extra credit question

Breeder’s Equation

R = h2 SA dog breeder chooses his largest dogs to

breed together. The average height of the breed is 60 cm (at the shoulder), and the dogs he chooses to breed average 70 cm tall.

He knows from previous work that the heritability of height is 0.5.

How big can he expect the offspring to be?

R = h2 S = 0.5 * 10cm = 5cm

Page 8: Extra credit question

Breeder’s Equation

R = h2 S = 0.5 * 10 cm = 5 cm

If the response to selection is 5 cm, he can expect his puppies to grow to be

60 cm + 5 cm = 65 cm tall

Page 9: Extra credit question

Exactly the same equation can be used to understand

natural selection!

Page 10: Extra credit question

Efficacy of natural selection:Darwin’s finches

Page 11: Extra credit question

If large bills are favored in drought years, what effect will

an El Nino year have on

the population?

h2 = 0.8

Page 12: Extra credit question

R = h2 S

Before El Nino mean bill depth = 10 cm. Birds that survived the drought had bills that were 2 mm deeper (on average) than the population mean.

Q: What happened to the average bill depth in the next generation?

A: R = 0.8 * 2mm = 1.6 mm. Bill depth next generation = 10 + 1.6 = 11.6 mm.

Page 13: Extra credit question

h2 = 1

h2 = 0

How do you measure the heritability?

Page 14: Extra credit question

Another way to measure h2

if R = h2 S, then h2 = R/SA corn breeder chooses to breed from plants that

have large cobs. The average cob length in his crop is 15 cm, but he breeds from plants that average 18 cm cobs.

Next year, he measures cob length in the offspring of the selected plants and discovers that the mean is 16 cm

What is the heritability of cob length in this population?

h2 = R/S = 1 cm/3 cm = 0.33

Page 15: Extra credit question
Page 16: Extra credit question
Page 17: Extra credit question

Most quantitative traits have substantial random environmental

variance

If h2=0.5, then 50% of the phenotypic variance

is additive genetic. What’s the other 50%?

h2 = VA/VP = VA/(VA+VD+VE)

Page 18: Extra credit question

Hydrangeas

Page 19: Extra credit question
Page 20: Extra credit question

Environmental effects on Quantitative Traits: Monozygotic Twins

Page 21: Extra credit question

Jones’s Farm Smith’s Farmh2 1.0 1.0milk yield 3 qts/day 2 qts/day

Heritability measured in one population does not tell you anything about differences

between populationsEnvironmental variation (VE) is not the same within and between populations

Page 22: Extra credit question
Page 23: Extra credit question

Genetic and Environmental Effects on Quantitative Traits

Page 24: Extra credit question

Can these methods be applied to humans?

Environmental variation cannot be controlled

Page 25: Extra credit question

Twin Studies

• Identical twins share 100% of alleles

• Fraternal twins share 50% of alleles

• Assume both kinds of twins share VE to the same extent

Page 26: Extra credit question

Correlations between identical co-twins

Complete genetic No genetic determination determination

154

156

158

160

162

164

166

168

170

172

174

176

150 155 160 165 170 175

Trait in Twin 1

Trait in Twin 2

r=1.0

140

145

150

155

160

165

170

175

180

185

190

150 155 160 165 170 175

Trait in Twin 1

Trait in Twin 2

r=0.0

Page 27: Extra credit question

Correlations between co-twins for adult height

150

155

160

165

170

175

180

150 155 160 165 170 175

Twin 1 Height

Twin 2 Height

140

145

150

155

160

165

170

175

180

185

190

150 155 160 165 170 175

Twin 1 Height

Twin 2 Height

Monozygotic (identical) Dizygotic (fraternal)

r=0.91 r=0.46

Page 28: Extra credit question

Heritability estimates from correlations between co-twins

• Identical twins share 100% of alleles• Fraternal twins share 50% of alleles

H2 ≈ 2* (ri - rf)

Height example: ri = 0.91, rf = 0.46

H2 = ?

H2 = 0.90

Page 29: Extra credit question

ri rf

Identical Fraternal H2

Fingerprint ridges 0.96 0.47 0.98Height 0.90 0.57 0.66IQ score 0.83 0.66 0.34Social maturity 0.97 0.89 0.16

Page 30: Extra credit question

Heritabilty estimates from human twin studies are biased

1. H2≈2* (ri - rf) overestimates true H2 by 0.5* VD/VP

2. H2 includes all genetic effects, not just additive genetic

3. GxE interaction increases variability among fraternal twins (it lowers rf) but does not affect ri, so H2 is overestimated

Page 31: Extra credit question

Heritabilty estimates from human twin studies are biased

4. Estimates assume identical and fraternal twins share environments to the same extent.

Do you think this is true?a) Identical twins share embryonic membrane.

b) Identical twins share more similar social environment.

Page 32: Extra credit question

Heritabilty estimates from human twin studies are biased

5. Studies often based on small sample sizes, and therefore estimates are not very precise (large standard errors)

6. Some studies include male-female fraternal twins, whereas identical twins are always the same sex.

Page 33: Extra credit question

Conclusions

Heritabiltiy estimates derived from human twin studies

should be considered very approximate, and probably

too high.

Page 34: Extra credit question

Molecular Biology and Quantitative Genetics

Page 35: Extra credit question

QTL Mapping

• Use DNA-based markers • Marker is anything that differs among

strains (RFLPs, microsatellites, single-base pair differnces)

• Markers close to genes will tend to be inherited along with genes (recombination rare)

Page 36: Extra credit question

Small Large

F1

Markers that are close to the QTL are inherited with it (recombination is rare)

sm

sm M

SM

S

MSs

m

Page 37: Extra credit question

Small Intermediate Large

F1:

F2:

MS

MSs

msm M

Ssm

MSs

m

Markers that are close to the QTL are inherited with it (recombination is rare)

Page 38: Extra credit question

If a marker is far from any gene affecting fruit weight, there will be recombination between the fruit-

weight and the marker

A marker far from a gene will not show a statistical association with the

phenotype

Page 39: Extra credit question

Many Markers

Page 40: Extra credit question
Page 41: Extra credit question

Results

• 28 QTLs responsible for fruit-weight variation in tomato

• One gene has been cloned and transferred between plants

• When “small” allele is transferred to normally large-fruited variety, the fruit weight is reduced by 30%

• Proof that the gene is really a QTL