explaining decisions

18

Click here to load reader

Upload: asingle

Post on 07-Jul-2015

100 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Explaining Decisions

Explaining decisions

Informing the public

The role of HTA organisations in consumer

information

Ann Single

Communication & Public Involvement Consultant

[email protected]

Page 2: Explaining Decisions

Health Technology Board for

Scotland consumer information

Two roles

1. Ensure those with skills &

responsibility for patient

communication have access to

information from the best scientific

evidence

2. Ensure organisation’s processes are

open to public scrutiny.

Page 3: Explaining Decisions

Consumer information

strategy

Four elements

● A transparent ethical framework for

HTAs based on agreed values

● Involvement of patient groups, health

professional & public

● Consumer-friendly publications

● Established information networks

Page 4: Explaining Decisions

Ethical framework

Built on organisational values

● Core convictions & culture of an organisation

● Characterise its policies, procedures & processes

● Obvious in all interactions

ethical framework ● public involvement ● publications ● networks

Page 5: Explaining Decisions

Creation of values

staff

Board

interest groups

Next step: public ethical framework ● public involvement ● publications ● networks

Page 6: Explaining Decisions

HTBS values

● Professionalism: We strive to achieve excellence through individual & team competencies by being conscientious, accurate, & efficient

● Usefulness: We aim to provide real & appreciable benefits for the health of the Scottish people

ethical framework ● public involvement ● publications ● networks

Page 7: Explaining Decisions

HTBS values continued

● Interdependence: We build productive relationships with immediate colleagues & the wider community, proactively considering the broader implications of our work. We recognise the whole is greater than the sum of all the parts

● Engagement: We promote dialogue & provide opportunities to involve all stakeholders (e.g. health service users, health professionals, policy makers, & manufacturers)

ethical framework ● public involvement ● publications ● networks

Page 8: Explaining Decisions

HTBS values continued

● Sensitivity: We are sensitive to & respect the feelings, needs, opinions & beliefs of individuals & organisations. We respect & encourage diversity

● Learning: We encourage the sharing & development of knowledge & experience to enable the Scottish people to improve the Nation’s health.

● Transparency: We communicate clearly the rationale for our decisions & actions

Page 9: Explaining Decisions

HTBS public involvement

Began

● Scottish Executive: Patient focus public involvement

● Need to understand social & ethical consequences in an HTA

Became

● Essential for engagement & patient-focused service redesign

ethical framework ● public involvement ● publications ● networks

Page 10: Explaining Decisions

Involvement from start to

finish

● Submission of topic

● Interpretation of evidence

Consultation

Topic specific group

● Communication of advice

Comment on drafts

Dissemination of information

● Feedback

ethical framework ● public involvement ● publications ● networks

Page 11: Explaining Decisions

Aim of publication

Understanding our advice

● For people who don’t have specialist knowledge in the area

● Explain what advice means for people using technology

● Show how advice was formed

● Explain what value judgments HTBS applied to evidence (where it came from & how it was used)

ethical framework ● public involvement ● publications ● networks

Page 12: Explaining Decisions

Understanding our advice

content

● Purpose of document

● Health technology (& side effects)

● Advice to health service

● How the HTBS Advice was formed

● Evidence used

● Sources of support

● Frequently used words

● HTBS

● Feedback

● Values

Page 13: Explaining Decisions

Using established networks

● Involved key patient groups at outset of HTA

● Patient groups able to keep networks informed of progress & feed in issues to HTA

● Worked with key patient interest groups to create & disseminate ‘Understanding our Advice’

● Provided support & information for patient interest group publications

ethical framework ● public involvement ● publications ● networks

Page 14: Explaining Decisions

Advising on consumer

information

● Research identified consumer

information needs & preferences

● Advice contained ‘Information needs’

ethical framework ● public involvement ● publications ● networks

Page 15: Explaining Decisions

What we achieved

● An information resource for non-experts

● Good relationships with patient & consumer interest groups

● Promotion of evidence based information

● Foundations of a culture of openness that enabled the organisation’s values, & in turn recommendations, to be understood &/or challenged by the community it served.

Page 16: Explaining Decisions

What we learnt

Benefits of involving public

● Establishes links into key consumer information providers quickly

● Focuses publication content & enhances clarity

● Builds good will & understanding

Benefits of separating roles

● Leaves patient information to the experts

● Focuses communication activities on organisational priorities, eg greater understanding of HTA

Page 17: Explaining Decisions

What we learnt

● Some organisations are highly skilled in

consumer/patient information

Unlikely to be an HTA organization

● An information hungry public may be

very supportive of any information

Regardless of quality, listen to your

critics, call on experts

● Manage expectations

Be clear about information aims &

involvement roles

Page 18: Explaining Decisions

Finally, we learnt

The more we engaged with consumers

the more we understood their

information needs

&

the more they understood their

treatment, the health service, HTAs,

us …